ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Radio-occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) for nonpalpable breast lesions

Radio-occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL) for nonpalpable breast lesions
Study Intervention Positive margin rate Re-excision rate
Arm n Percent p value Percent p value
Postma et al[1] ROLL 162 14 0.644 12 0.587
WGL 152 12 10
Gray et al[2] RSL 51 – – 26 0.02
WGL 46 – 57
Rarick et al[3] RSL 44 23 0.69 – –
WGL 62 24 –
Bloomquist et al[4] RSL 72 19.4 0.53 – –
WGL 59 15.3 –
Sharek et al[5] RSL 114 – – 21.1 0.360
WGL 118 – 26.3
Murphy et al[6] RSL 431 7.7 0.38 23.0 0.83
WGL 256 5.5 22.3
Hughes et al[7] RSL 383 27 <0.001 8 <0.001
WGL 99 46 25
Duarte et al[8] ROLL 64 59 NS 25 NS
WGL 65 60 19
van der Noordaa et al[9] RSL 128 19.5 0.942 9.4 0.801
ROLL 275 18.5 10.2
Donker et al[10] RSL 83 13 NS 8 0.778
ROLL 71 13 7
Taylor et al[11] RSL 327 5.5 0.183 13.9 0.019
WGL 332 7.8 18.9
WGL: wire-guided localization; NS: not specified.
References:
  1. Postma EL, Witkamp AJ, van den Bosch MA, et al. Localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011; 11:1295.
  2. Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: Radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8:711.
  3. Rarick J, Kimler BF, Tawfik O. Comparison of margin status and lesional size between radioactive seed localized vs conventional wire localized breast lumpectomy specimens. Ann Diagn Pathol 2016; 21:47.
  4. Bloomquist EV, Ajkay N, Patil S, et al. A randomized prospective comparison of patient-assessed satisfaction and clinical outcomes with radioactive seed localization versus wire localization. Breast J 2016; 22:151.
  5. Sharek D, Zuley ML, Zhang JY, et al. Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:872.
  6. Murphy JO, Moo TA, King TA, et al. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: Initial 6-month experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20:4121.
  7. Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ, et al. A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J 2008; 14:153.
  8. Duarte C, Bastidas F, de los Reyes A, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing radioguided occult lesion localization with wire-guided lesion localization to evaluate their efficacy and accuracy in the localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Surgery 2016; 159:1140.
  9. van der Noordaa ME, Pengel KE, Groen E, et al. The use of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer: A comparison with the radioguided occult lesion localization with 99m technetium. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:553.
  10. Donker M, Drukker CA, Valdes Olmos RA, et al. Guiding breast-conserving surgery in patients after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: A comparison of radioactive seed localization with the ROLL technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20:2569.
  11. Taylor DB, Bourke AG, Westcott EJ, et al. Surgical outcomes after radioactive 125I seed versus hookwire localization of non-palpable breast cancer: A multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108:40.
Graphic 117266 Version 2.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟