ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Prophylactic mesh parastomal surgical outcomes

Prophylactic mesh parastomal surgical outcomes
Author, year Repair type Mesh type Mesh overlap Mesh fixation Mesh location SSI
Serra-Aracil, 2009[1] Keyhole parastomal Composite mesh (poliglecaprone-25 monofilament and polypropylene) 5 cm Not specified Retromuscular 14.3% mesh versus 14.8% control
López-Cano, 2016[2] Sugarbaker parastomal Composite (2 polyglecaprone-25 and polypropylene) Not specified Resorbable tacks Intraperitoneal –
ROCSS, 2020[3] Stoma site closure Biologic (bovine) 3 cm Transfascial 2-0 polydioxanone suture Intraperitoneal 16% mesh versus 13% control
Pizza, 2022[4] Keyhole parastomal Bioabsorbable (Bio-A) 8 cm round mesh Transfascial suture Retromuscular 3.6% mesh versus 3.6% control
SSI: surgical site infection; ROCSS: Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site.
References:
  1. Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J, et al. Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 2009; 249:583.
  2. López-Cano M, Serra-Aracil X, Mora L, et al. Preventing parastomal hernia using a modified sugarbaker technique with composite mesh during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2016; 264:923.
  3. Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): A multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 395:417.
  4. Pizza F, D'Antonio D, Lucido FS, et al. Is absorbable mesh useful in preventing parastomal hernia after emergency surgery? The PARTHENOPE study. Hernia 2022; 26:507.

Adapted from: Prudhomme M, Fabbro-Peray P, Rullier E, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 2020.

Graphic 131367 Version 2.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟