ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Date rape: Risk factors and prevention

Date rape: Risk factors and prevention
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Jul 28, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — The epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of date rape will be discussed here. The identification and management of date rape, adolescent relationship abuse, sexual abuse, and the evaluation and management of sexual assault are discussed separately.

(See "Date rape: Identification and management".)

(See "Adolescent relationship abuse including physical and sexual teen dating violence".)

(See "Evaluation of sexual abuse in children and adolescents".)

(See "Management and sequelae of sexual abuse in children and adolescents".)

(See "Evaluation and management of adult and adolescent sexual assault victims in the emergency department".)

TERMINOLOGY

Sexual assault/sexual violence – Sexual assault or sexual violence is an inclusive term that refers to any form of forced or inappropriate unwanted sexual contact ranging from forced touching or kissing to verbally or physically coerced vaginal, oral, or anal penetration [1-4]. This includes situations in which the victim is unable to consent because of intoxication, inability to understand the consequences, misperceptions because of age, or other incapacities.

Rape – The legal definition of rape varies from state to state [5]. It generally encompasses nonconsensual vaginal, anal, or oral penetration (by penis, finger, or object) that involves force or threat of force (physical or psychological), lack of consent, or inability to provide consent because of age, intoxication, or mental status [5-8]. One way in which rape is categorized is by the relationship between perpetrator and victim.

Stranger rape describes nonconsensual sexual penetration between individuals who do not know each other before the sexual act [8].

Acquaintance rape describes nonconsensual sexual penetration between individuals who know each other in some capacity before the sexual act [8].

-Date rape is a subset of acquaintance rape in which nonconsensual sexual penetration occurs between two people who may be romantically involved or more casually connected (eg, on a date, "hooking up") [8]. Date rape can occur when the victim is alert and able to make decisions, semiconscious, or unable to respond due to alcohol or other drug use. It can occur between two individuals who have had prior consensual sexual intercourse or other forms of intimacy. Verbal coercion, threats or use of physical force, or the use of alcohol or illicit drugs may occur as precipitating events.

In many cases, date rape occurs within the context of a heterosexual dating relationship, with the male as perpetrator and the female as the victim. Same sex and female-to-male sexual violence also occur in dating relationships [9,10]. The prevalence of sexual violence victimization among transgender and nonbinary individuals is increasingly recognized [11]. However, because these types of dating and sexual violence have not yet been adequately studied, the epidemiology and available research focus on heterosexual dating and sexual violence, generally violence used by men and boys against women and girls. Although this topic refers to people who have experienced sexual violence as "victims," there is a growing body of literature that emphasizes the strengths of those who have been harmed, using terms such as "survivors" [12,13].

EPIDEMIOLOGY — Adolescent and young adult women (16 to 24 years of age) are more likely to be victims of sexual assault than are women in all other age groups [7,14]. Most sexual assault survivors (80 percent) experience their first assault before the age of 24 years [15]. Adolescents who have experienced a rape or attempted rape are three to four times as likely as those without this history to experience subsequent sexual assault during their college years [16-19].

The majority of rape incidents in adolescent and young adult females are committed by someone who is known to the victim; as many as 80 to 90 percent of sexual assaults on college campuses are perpetrated by a date or acquaintance [16,20]. Approximately one-fourth of college-age men report having used coercion during sexual contact [21].

Although nonconsensual sexual activity is common among adolescents and young adults, prevalence estimates vary widely depending on how the data are collected and measured, as illustrated below [22-26]:

In the 2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 7 percent of high school students reported that at some point during their lifetime they had been physically forced to have sexual intercourse when they did not want to [27]. The prevalence of forced sexual intercourse was greater among females than males (11 versus 3 percent). Among the 66 percent of students who dated or went out with someone in the 12 months before the survey, 8 percent reported sexual dating violence (including kissing, touching, or being physically forced to have sexual intercourse when they did not want to by someone they were dating or going out with) at least once in the 12 months before the survey (approximately 13 percent for girls and 4 percent for boys) [28]. In addition, 8 percent of those who dated or went out with someone in the 12 months before the survey reported physical dating violence (eg, being hit, slammed into something, or injured with an object or weapon) at least once in that time period (approximately 9 percent for girls and 7 percent for boys).

In a longitudinal cohort, 40 percent of adolescent women (14 to 17 years of age) reported having had unwanted penile-vaginal intercourse within a relationship in the previous three months in face-to-face interviews [22].

In a cross-sectional survey of adolescent and young adult women (14 to 23 years of age) at an urban health care facility, 30 percent reported an unwanted sexual experience (touching or kissing without permission, rape/attempted rape, or being talked or pressured into having unwanted intercourse) within a dating relationship in the previous 12 months [23].

In a cross-sectional survey of dating violence among adolescents (13 to 21 years of age) evaluated in an urban pediatric emergency department, 34 percent of females reported sexual victimization (eg, physical assault, psychological aggression, sexual coercion) in the previous 12 months [29].

In a 2011 literature review, the rate of reported rapes (by either acquaintance or stranger) among female college students ranged from 14 to 22 percent [9].

Most sexual assaults reported in individuals ≥18 years occur in the late evening and early morning hours (between 9 PM and 3 AM) [30].

RISK FACTORS — An understanding of the risk factors for date rape is the first step in prevention. Risk factors for date rape can be broadly classified into those related to the victim, those related to the perpetrator, and those related to the dating situation (table 1) [7]. Although these are factors may influence the likelihood of experiencing or using sexual violence in relationships, they are not determinants. They should be interpreted with caution and never used to blame victims.

Risk factors associated with victimization — Victim characteristics that are associated with an increased risk of date and acquaintance rape include [7,23,25,31,32]:

Chronologic age – Adolescents and young adults 16 to 24 years of age experience sexual assault in greater numbers than women in other age groups [16-19].

Previous history of victimization – Past history of victimization (sexual or physical) is one of the most important risk factors for date and acquaintance rape [16-19,33]. Adolescents who have experienced a rape or attempted rape before the age of 18 are three to four times more likely to experience a subsequent sexual assault during their college years than those without this history. The increased risk of revictimization may be related to increased use of alcohol or drugs, increased numbers of consensual sexual partners, and/or decreased ability to resist unwanted sexual advances [33-37]. However, it is not clear whether these associated factors are precursors to victimization, consequences of victimization, or both [38]. An observational study found that women who reported past experience with sexual aggression during dating situations were more accepting of violence toward women and rape myths than women who did not report victimization [39].

Greater number of dating or sexual partners (which increases the exposure to potential perpetrators) and early onset of sexual activity (which is often associated with exposure to childhood sexual abuse) [40].

Perpetrator characteristics — Potential perpetrators of date rape are difficult to identify in advance [7]. However, some characteristics that may increase the possibility of sexual coercion include [41]:

Strong belief in traditional gender roles – When establishing their sexual identity, adolescent and young adult men who have strong belief in traditional gender roles may feel the need to be forceful, aggressive, or dominant [42-44]. Men with strong belief in traditional gender roles have attitudes more accepting of rape [45]. These attitudes may be reinforced by certain types of media [46]. (See 'Adolescent perceptions of sexual behavior' below.)

Acceptance of violence or hostility toward women and fear of being labeled "gay" [47,48].

Acceptance of rape myths – Acceptance of rape myths encourages and reinforces sexual violence. (See 'Acceptance of rape myths' below.)

Early involvement in sexual experiences (forced or voluntary) [49].

Alcohol misuse and abuse [50].

Sexual fantasies involving coercion.

History of sexual victimization or perpetration.

Situational factors — Situational factors that may predispose to acquaintance or date rape include:

Existing relationship – An existing relationship between the victim and perpetrator where there is a power differential [7].

Misperceptions – Misperceptions of date-specific factors by the perpetrator may increase the risk of sexual aggression. The perpetrator may perceive the victim's nonverbal communication, mode of dress, use of alcohol, or willingness to be alone as a willingness to have sex despite verbalizations and nonverbal signals to the contrary. Acceptance of rape myths, the use of alcohol or other drugs, and belief in traditional gender roles may contribute to such misperceptions. (See 'Other contributing factors' below.)

Date-specific factors – Certain factors specific to the date may increase the risk of date or acquaintance rape. These include who initiated the date, how expensive the date was, who paid the expenses, who drove, and the location of the dating activity [42,51]. (See 'Adolescent perceptions of sexual behavior' below.)

Predatory behaviors – Sexual violence perpetrators (especially those who engage in serial rape) specifically seek out marginalized youth (eg, young people who appear socially withdrawn, queer youth, youth aging out of foster care, or youth in other unstable social situations) because they may be easier targets for sexual violence perpetration [52].

Gender and ethnic differences in perceptions of the role of date-specific factors in date rape have been reported among adolescents and young adults [53-55].

Alcohol use — Alcohol use contributes to the occurrence of date and acquaintance rape [38,56-63]. Alcohol consumption by the perpetrator, victim, or both, is estimated to be involved in approximately one-half of sexual assaults among adolescents and young adults [61]. Sexual assaults between partners who are acquaintances or casual dates often involve alcohol [64].

Alcohol contributes to sexual assault through multiple pathways, often exacerbating other risk factors [65,66]. It is the number one "date rape" drug and is often used to subdue and control victims. The use of alcohol may affect both the perpetrator and the victim [59]. Alcohol use may lead the perpetrator to misinterpret cues as sexual invitation, to inaccurately discriminate the date's sexual intentions, to be unable to recognize the perpetrator's own inappropriate sexual behavior, or to overestimate the date's sexual arousal [59,67]. Several studies suggest that men perceive a woman who is drinking alcohol to be more sexually available and more likely to have sex with her partner than a woman who is not drinking [68]. Some male perpetrators may encourage their dates to drink because they believe that alcohol increases the woman's interest in sex, decreases her sexual inhibition, and increases her sexual initiative [7,66,69-71], whereas others may consume alcohol as a means of justifying their behavior [61]. (See 'Acceptance of rape myths' below.)

The effects of alcohol may reduce the victim's perception of sexual assault risk, diminish the victim's ability to cope with or ward off unwanted sexual advances, or to be aware of or remember the assault [59,72,73]. Victims who have used alcohol may feel responsible for the sexual assault. Such perception of self-responsibility may have long-lasting psychological implications for the victim [7]. Such psychological consequences can also include heavy drinking as a coping strategy after sexual violence victimization. (See "Date rape: Identification and management", section on 'Symptoms and sequelae'.)

Drug use — Drug use also may contribute to date and acquaintance rape and coercive sexual violence, whether the drugs are used voluntarily by the victim, perpetrator, or both or administered to the victim surreptitiously or coercively to facilitate sexual assault (ie, "date rape drugs") [3,60,63].

Any drug that causes sedation, decreases inhibition, or increases libido may be used to facilitate sexual assault [74]. Such drugs include benzodiazepines (including commonly prescribed benzodiazepines as well as flunitrazepam [Rohypnol]), 3,4-methylendioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or ecstasy), ketamine, gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), cannabinoids, and over-the-counter antihistamines, among others [63,75]. The combination of alcohol with any of these drugs can lead to adverse reactions and death.

Flunitrazepam is a sedative that is prescribed in Latin America and Europe for the treatment of insomnia and as a preanesthetic medication; it has not been approved in the United States [76]. It is used illicitly to heighten the effect of alcohol and other drugs. It is 10 times more potent than diazepam. When mixed with alcohol it is incapacitating and amnestic, increasing vulnerability to sexual assault. In a cross-sectional survey of adolescents and young women attending university-based ambulatory reproductive health clinics, 1 in 10 adolescent and young adult females who reported voluntary use of flunitrazepam also reported experiencing physical or sexual assault [77].

MDMA, GHB, and ketamine are additional "date rape" drugs. MDMA is a psychoactive drug with amphetamine and hallucinogenic properties. It reduces inhibitions and produces feelings of empathy for others [78]. Effects of MDMA include confusion, severe dehydration, muscle tension, and blurred vision. Trends in MDMA use among adolescents and adults are discussed separately. (See "MDMA (ecstasy) intoxication", section on 'Epidemiology'.)

Ketamine and GHB are central nervous system depressants. They are often colorless, tasteless, and odorless, and can easily be added to beverages. Ketamine can cause delirium, amnesia, and depression. GHB induces dizziness, nausea, and visual disturbances. (See "Ketamine poisoning", section on 'Clinical presentation' and "Gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) intoxication", section on 'Clinical features of acute toxicity'.)

OTHER CONTRIBUTING FACTORS — Other factors that may contribute to date rape include acceptance of rape myths, adolescent perceptions of sexual behavior, and cultural considerations.

Acceptance of rape myths — Rape myths are prejudiced, stereotyped, or false beliefs about rape, rape victims, and rapists [39]. Acceptance of rape myths perpetuates unwanted sexual contact by encouraging and reinforcing coercive sexual behavior. Examples of rape myths include [39,42,43,79]:

"Most rapists are strangers."

"Acquaintance rape is not 'real rape' and does not harm the victim."

"All women want to be raped."

"No means yes."

"Only bad girls get raped."

"Any healthy woman can resist a rapist if she really wants to."

"Women who dress promiscuously are 'asking for it.'"

"Women who lead men on therefore deserve to be raped."

"Women 'cry rape' only when they've been jilted or have something to cover up."

"A woman who goes to a man's home on their first date implies that she is willing to have sex."

Adolescent perceptions of sexual behavior — An understanding of how adolescents view sexual behavior is critical to the prevention of date rape. Many adolescents do not perceive date rape as rape unless it occurred with physical force or verbal threats [80,81]. When presented with vignettes depicting date rape scenarios, adolescents rarely describe rape that occurred in a dating relationship as "real rape" because of the voluntary association between the victim and the perpetrator [80]. In many instances, there may have been prior consensual sex or some other form of intimacy with this partner.

Male and female adolescents often follow a script in which males are viewed as initiators and females as "gatekeepers" of sexual intercourse. Because of these perceived roles, date-specific characteristics can be over-interpreted as signals for sex [80,82]. Females who wear short skirts, for example, may be viewed by males as willing to have sex, regardless of their actual intent. Similarly, it is assumed that females who have reputations for being "easy" are going to have sex with every dating partner.

Strong belief in traditional gender roles — Males and females with strong beliefs in traditional gender roles have attitudes more accepting of sexual coercion [45].

Acceptability of forced sexual activity — In surveys of adolescents and young adults, the degree of perceived acceptability of sexual coercion varies depending upon the context. However, in a survey of high school students, it was universally perceived that when a female uses physical force and says "no" to sexual advances, she does not want to engage in sexual activity and the male does not have the right to use coercion or force against her [83]. Similarly, college students identified inappropriate sexual activity earlier in a date rape vignette when they had heard a clearly articulated sexual boundary than when they had not [84].

Among college women, forced sexual intercourse appears to be perceived as more permissible when the perpetrator is a date or acquaintance than a stranger [8,85]. Young women may endorse some of the same cultural stereotypes and attitudes reported by those who use sexual violence. Such attitudes may encourage victims of date rape to believe that they were responsible for the rape and prevent them from disclosure. (See 'Acceptance of rape myths' above and "Date rape: Identification and management", section on 'Barriers to disclosure'.)

College women who report experiences of sexual victimization may not self-identify as victims. Greater acquaintance with the perpetrator, higher levels of self-blame, and victim substance use at the time of the assault are associated with labeling the sexual assault as a serious miscommunication, rather than as a sexual assault, date rape, rape, or crime [86].

Sexual rights and responsibilities — Some adolescents may perceive that a dating relationship comes with specific entitlements, contributing to norms that condone sexual violence [80]. Studies suggest that these attitudes regarding sexual relationships are present in early adolescence. In one survey, four of five adolescents reported that forced sex is acceptable if a couple has been dating for six or more months and almost 50 percent reported that forced sex is acceptable if the female has gotten the male sexually excited [80]. In another survey of high school students, 39 percent of boys and 12 percent of girls reported that it was "okay for a boy to force a girl to have sex with him if they have had sex before," and 37 percent of boys and 23 percent of girls reported that it was "okay for a boy to force a girl to have sex with him if she gets him sexually excited" [54]. More recent studies have underscored that these perceptions of gender relations and sexual hierarchies form early in adolescence [87].

Women may believe that once they are in a dating relationship they no longer have sexual choices. Data collected in a reproductive health clinic revealed that 20 percent of women aged 14 to 26 years who reported having a steady partner believed that they did not have the right to stop sexual foreplay at any time, including at the point of intercourse [88]. Moreover, 20 percent reported believing that once consensual sex between dating partners has occurred, they cannot refuse to have intercourse in the future.

Interpretation of nonverbal communication — The occurrence of sex is often determined more by perceptions and beliefs about nonverbal behaviors than by open and honest verbal communications. Unfortunately, cues and signals for sexual intimacy are perceived and interpreted differently by adolescents and young adults [80,83].

Cultural considerations — Adolescent rape occurs in a sociocultural context in which male dominance, appropriate gender behaviors, victimization, violence, and power imbalance in relationships are highly visible [89]. Religious and/or ethnic values may affect perceptions of appropriate gender roles and sexual behavior [55]. The dominant cultural beliefs of the patient's community, especially when the community has strict ideas about appropriate women's social roles and rights, play a role in assigning moral as well as causal responsibility in sexual victimization [90]. In communities that experience marginalization and oppression, shaming, internalized discrimination, and structural inequities further contribute to isolation and silence surrounding sexual violence [91]. Assessing parent/caregiver expectations about dating and relationships may be helpful in providing anticipatory guidance about healthy dating relationships and sexual communication.

PREVENTION

Anticipatory guidance — Anticipatory guidance for the prevention of date rape has several components, including the promotion of healthy dating relationships by helping patients learn to communicate effectively about sexual beliefs, desires, and boundaries; dispelling rape myths; educating patients about harm reduction strategies to mitigate risk for date rape; and advising them about what to do if they experience sexual assault. Anticipatory guidance about healthy dating and sexual relationships should be provided to all adolescents using materials inclusive of diverse sexual attraction and gender identities [3].

The American Academy of Pediatrics' Connected Kids: Safe, Strong, Secure program recommends that the concept of healthy dating be introduced at 11 to 14 years and reinforced at subsequent visits [92]. The program includes educational brochures for teens and caregivers.

Process — To foster a better awareness and understanding of sexual violence, conversations about date rape specifically, and sexual coercion in general, should be interactive and occur at each visit. Universal education and brief counseling interventions may reduce relationship abuse victimization [93].

It is important to avoid lectures. Instead, present facts and listen to the concerns and reactions of the patient. To promote awareness and encourage open and honest conversation about the topic of dating violence, providers can use a normalizing statement for discussing dating violence. As an example, one could start by saying, "Unfortunately, many of my patients have been hurt physically or sexually, either as children or during more recent relationships. Because I want to help my patients, I discuss these issues with every patient. I also know that it may be hard for some patients to talk about being hurt in their lives" [94].

The health care provider must take all concerns seriously and answer questions honestly. In addition, the provider must confront distortions and myths. As an example, providers can say, "While it is okay for a dating partner to be jealous, jealousy is not the same as love. A partner who tries to tell you what to do or who to hang out with, puts you down, or makes you feel guilty or bad about yourself is not acting out of love." Young patients need to be encouraged to trust their instincts about a given dating situation or partner: "If your partner or relationship feels uncomfortable to you, talk about it with an adult you trust."

Empathy induction is a tool that can be used to facilitate attitudinal and behavioral changes in adolescents with regard to sexual assault prevention and may be particularly helpful for adolescents who believe they are invulnerable to sexual assault [95]. Empathy induction involves asking the patient what it would be like for them, their sister, or their close friend to experience date rape. This allows the patient to better understand and listen to the information that the provider is sharing and allows the provider to make attributions to the patient's personal behaviors without being confrontational.

Finally, it is useful to encourage the caregiver to be an active participant in discussions about dating violence and to provide information and/or resources to the caregivers for these discussions [96-98]. Caregivers can continue and extend the conversations after the visit; they can also monitor for signs that their adolescent may be in a violent dating relationship. These include a partner:

Who is jealous and possessive

Who is bossy (eg, gives orders, makes all the decisions)

Embarrasses or puts the adolescent down in front of others

Has a history of losing his temper or physical violence

Pressures the adolescent to use alcohol or drugs

Components of anticipatory guidance

Sexual communication – Health care providers for adolescents and young adults can help their patients to develop sexual communications skills and the corresponding self-efficacy to use them. In a survey of adolescent females, factors associated with consistent refusal to engage in unwanted sex included high safer sex self-efficacy (ie, belief in their ability to enact a behavior), few perceived barriers to negotiation with partners about condoms, and frequent conversations with caregivers about sexual issues [96].

Health care providers can assess their patients' sexual communication skills by asking how the patient communicates sexual preferences and beliefs to their partner. Patients can be empowered by being told that discussing sexual intimacy does not mean that they have to be sexually intimate.

It is important for adolescents and young adults to understand that they have choices in a sexual relationship regardless of the relationship's duration and to be able to effectively communicate those choices [84]. Many adolescent and young adult couples do not openly discuss desires for sexual intimacy. As a result, communication about sexual intent usually relies on nonverbal cues and signals, which can lead to misinterpretation, particularly among younger teens [99]. To minimize misinterpretation, adolescents and young adults must learn to identify and communicate their sexual desires and needs to their partners in a healthy and straightforward manner. (See 'Situational factors' above and 'Adolescent perceptions of sexual behavior' above.)

Correcting rape myths – The acceptance and perpetuation of rape myths contributes to date rape. Dispelling rape myths is an important component of date rape prevention. This entails helping adolescents understand that [3,100,101]:

Forced intercourse without consent is rape, regardless of the context (eg, previous consensual sex; use of alcohol or drugs; ongoing dating relationship); this includes incapacitated rape (being drunk or high and not able to give consent); individuals who are raped should seek medical care

The majority of rapes of adolescents and young adults are perpetrated by people they know and may trust; perpetrators usually cannot be identified before an attempt is made

They have choices in a sexual relationship regardless of the relationship's duration; they have the right to set sexual limits and insist that their partner honor the limits; talking about sexual intimacy does not mean that they have to have sexual intercourse

They should not be afraid to fight back; reinforcing verbal refusal of unwanted sexual activity with physical force (eg, kicking, biting, or hitting) may be effective in stopping the attack [83,102]

Harm reduction strategies and protective behaviors – Adolescents should be able to identify strategies that can help them and their friends increase safety and avoid situations that may increase likelihood of harm, such as [3,101,103]:

Leaving a party with someone they do not know

Taking a drink from someone they do not know and trust – alcohol is the number one "date rape" drug and is often used to subdue and control victims

Leaving their drinks unattended

Meeting alone with people with whom they made initial contact through internet

Walking alone at night

Being pressured into using alcohol or drugs

Accepting help from someone they do not know if they fall ill at a party (whether from having too much to drink or the possibility that a date rape drug was added to their drink)

Dating individuals who are jealous and possessive, bossy, embarrass or put them down in front of others, or have a history of losing their temper or physical violence

Adolescents should learn to trust their feelings and intuitions about potentially risky situations – if it feels wrong or unsafe, it probably is. That said, with any discussion of harm reduction strategies, unsafe situations, and protective behaviors, the message to young people should be clear: No one ever deserves to experience sexual violence; victims are not to blame. Many incidents of sexual violence occur between people who know each other and in familiar locations.

Prevention programs — Providers who are interested may advocate for date rape prevention programs in schools, college campuses, and other locations where youth congregate in their communities. Formal date and acquaintance rape prevention programs typically target changes in rape awareness, as well as attitudes and assertiveness, to minimize the likelihood of rape [104].

Programs targeting both male and female participants generally focus on cross-gender communication and dating expectations, with some emphasizing the "shared responsibility" of both partners in date/acquaintance rape; they consistently report a decrease in rape-supportive attitudes or behaviors [95,105].

The Safe Dates Project evaluated the effects of primary and secondary prevention of dating violence among rural eighth and ninth graders [106,107]. Using school- and community-based activities, the intervention program increased awareness, addressed help-seeking for dating violence, and provided training to improve health care providers' ability to care for adolescents experiencing dating violence or date/acquaintance rape. Participants in the intervention group reported less psychologic abuse, sexual violence, and dating violence 12 months after the program ended. Most program effects were related to changes in dating violence norms, gender stereotyping, and awareness of services.

Programs targeting women have been effective in improving participants' awareness of rape and decreasing the incidence of completed rape [95,108-110]. Personalizing the program may increase the perception of vulnerability and the intent to avoid risk-taking behaviors (eg, using alcohol on dates and dating hostile or jealous individuals) [109]. Women with a history of victimization are at particular risk for revictimization. (See 'Risk factors associated with victimization' above.)

In an open-label randomized trial in 893 female first-year university students, those who participated in the Enhanced AAA (assess, acknowledge, act) Sexual Assault Education Resistance program had a lower risk of self-reported completed rape at one year than control students who had access to brochures on sexual assault (5.2 versus 9.8 percent, relative risk reduction 46 percent, 95% CI 7-69) [110]. The Enhanced AAA Sexual Assault Education Resistance program consisted of four three-hour sessions that focused on assessing the risk of sexual assault by an acquaintance, acknowledging the danger in coercive situations and overcoming emotional barriers to acknowledging danger, engaging in effective verbal and physical self-defense, and sexuality and relationships. Other programs have been ineffective or less effective (eg, effective for shorter durations or only in particular subgroups) [108,111-114]. Compared with these programs, the Enhanced AAA Sexual Assault Resistance education program had more hours of programming, more interactive and practice exercises, and a greater focus on escalation of resistance in response to a perpetrator's perseverance.

Programs targeting males also report success in modifying attitudes following program participation [115-118]. One program, called "Coaching Boys into Men," specifically trains athletic coaches to deliver sexual and partner violence prevention messages to their male athletes. In a cluster randomized trial, athletes exposed to the program demonstrated greater likelihood of intervening when witnessing peers' disrespectful and harmful behaviors three months later and reduced abuse perpetration one year later [117,118]. This program has also been shown to be effective in increasing positive bystander behaviors and reducing dating abuse perpetration among middle school male athletes [119]. However, another program observed a "backlash" effect, wherein a small number of males reported increased aggressive attitudes following an intervention, suggesting that males who are already sexually aggressive may require secondary, rather than primary, prevention [120,121].

Programs on college campuses designed to mobilize bystanders to take action against sexual assault have reported success in changing date rape knowledge and attitudes and increasing bystander efficacy and intention to intervene [122-125]. One program for male undergraduate students also reported that program participants had less hostility toward women, had less positive views of nonconsensual sex, and less comfort with other men's inappropriate behaviors than nonparticipants [126,127].

RESOURCES — Resources related to date/acquaintance rape for patients, caregivers, and providers are listed below:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Preventing Teen Dating Violence

Futures Without Violence

Hanging out or hooking up: Clinical guidelines on responding to adolescent relationship abuse: An integrated approach to prevention and integration

Protocol for Adolescent Relationship Abuse Prevention and Intervention

National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health (Georgetown University)

The National Center for the Victims of Crime

The National Sexual Violence Resource Center

Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network

TeensHealth from Nemours

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Sexual assault".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Terminology – Date rape refers to nonconsensual sexual penetration that occurs between two people who are in a romantic relationship, dating, or involved sexually. (See 'Terminology' above.)

Risk factors – Date rape occurs predominantly in adolescent and young adult women (age 16 through 24 years). Other risk factors for date rape are listed in the table (table 1). (See 'Risk factors' above.)

Other contributing factors – Other factors that contribute to date rape include acceptance of rape myths (prejudiced, stereotyped, or false beliefs about rape, rape victims, and rapists), strong belief in traditional gender roles, perceptions that forced sexual activity is acceptable in certain circumstances (eg, the victim has led the perpetrator on), the belief that sexual rights and responsibilities are inherent in a dating relationship, and the misperception of nonverbal cues or signals for desired sexual intimacy. (See 'Other contributing factors' above.)

Prevention and resources – Adolescents and young adults should be provided with anticipatory guidance to prevent date rape. This includes promoting healthy dating and sexual relationships by helping patients learn to communicate effectively about sexual beliefs, desires, and boundaries; dispelling rape myths; educating patients to avoid risk factors for date rape; and advising them about what to do if they or someone they know is sexually assaulted despite their precautions. (See 'Prevention' above and 'Resources' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Samantha Harrykissoon, JD, MPH, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review, and Vaughn Rickert, PsyD, who also contributed to an earlier version of this topic review and passed away in June 2015.

  1. Young A, Grey M, Abbey A, et al. Alcohol-related sexual assault victimization among adolescents: prevalence, characteristics, and correlates. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2008; 69:39.
  2. Danielson CK, Holmes MM. Adolescent sexual assault: an update of the literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 16:383.
  3. Crawford-Jakubiak JE, Alderman EM, Leventhal JM, et al. Care of the Adolescent After an Acute Sexual Assault. Pediatrics 2017; 139.
  4. Basile KC, Smith SG, Breiding MJ, et al. Sexual violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements. Version 2.0. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2014. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/index.html (Accessed on September 27, 2018).
  5. Rickert VI, Etter DJ, Chacko MR. Sexual assault and victimization. In: Neinstein's Adolescent and Young Adult Health Care: A Practical Guide, 6th ed, Neinstein LS. (Ed), Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2016 p.610.
  6. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/FEMVIED.PDF (Accessed on April 27, 2011).
  7. Lam C, Roman B. When Granny Is the Wolf: Understanding and Approaching College-aged Female Victims of Acquaintance Rape. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2009; 6:18.
  8. Rickert VI, Wiemann CM. Date rape among adolescents and young adults. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 1998; 11:167.
  9. Porter J, Williams LM. Intimate violence among underrepresented groups on a college campus. J Interpers Violence 2011; 26:3210.
  10. Basile KC, Hamburger ME, Swahn MH, Choi C. Sexual Violence Perpetration by Adolescents in Dating versus Same-Sex Peer Relationships: Differences in Associated Risk and Protective Factors. West J Emerg Med 2013; 14:329.
  11. Johns MM, Lowry R, Andrzejewski J, et al. Transgender Identity and Experiences of Violence Victimization, Substance Use, Suicide Risk, and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among High School Students - 19 States and Large Urban School Districts, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68:67.
  12. Schwark S, Bohner G. Sexual Violence-"Victim" or "Survivor": News Images Affect Explicit and Implicit Judgments of Blame. Violence Against Women 2019; 25:1491.
  13. Williamson J, Serna K. Reconsidering Forced Labels: Outcomes of Sexual Assault Survivors Versus Victims (and Those Who Choose Neither). Violence Against Women 2018; 24:668.
  14. Smith SG, Chen J, Basile KC, et al. The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NSIVS): 2010-2012 state report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Division of Violence Prevention 2017. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/summaryreports.html (Accessed on September 27, 2018).
  15. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 summary report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2011. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/summaryreports.html (Accessed on September 27, 2018).
  16. Carey KB, Durney SE, Shepardson RL, Carey MP. Incapacitated and forcible rape of college women: prevalence across the first year. J Adolesc Health 2015; 56:678.
  17. Mokma TR, Eshelman LR, Messman-Moore TL. Contributions of Child Sexual Abuse, Self-Blame, Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, and Alcohol Use to Women's Risk for Forcible and Substance-Facilitated Sexual Assault. J Child Sex Abus 2016; 25:428.
  18. Classen CC, Palesh OG, Aggarwal R. Sexual revictimization: a review of the empirical literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 2005; 6:103.
  19. Simmel C, Postmus JL, Lee I. Sexual revictimization in adult women: examining factors associated with their childhood and adulthood experiences. J Child Sex Abus 2012; 21:593.
  20. Sinozich S, Langton L. Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995-2013. Special Report, Bureau of Justice Statistics; Department of Justice, Washington, DC 2014.
  21. Koss MP, Gidycz CA, Wisniewski N. The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987; 55:162.
  22. Blythe MJ, Fortenberry JD, Temkit M, et al. Incidence and correlates of unwanted sex in relationships of middle and late adolescent women. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006; 160:591.
  23. Rickert VI, Wiemann CM, Vaughan RD, White JW. Rates and risk factors for sexual violence among an ethnically diverse sample of adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158:1132.
  24. Foshee VA, Benefield TS, Ennett ST, et al. Longitudinal predictors of serious physical and sexual dating violence victimization during adolescence. Prev Med 2004; 39:1007.
  25. Lin AJ, Raymond M, Catallozzi M, et al. Relationship violence in adolescence. Adolesc Med State Art Rev 2007; 18:530.
  26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. High School YRBS. Youth Online. Unintentional injuries and violence. https://nccd.cdc.gov/Youthonline/App/Default.aspx (Accessed on September 08, 2020).
  27. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ 2018; 67:1.
  28. Basile KC, Clayton HB, DeGue S, et al. Interpersonal Violence Victimization Among High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019. MMWR Suppl 2020; 69:28.
  29. Carroll BC, Raj A, Noel SE, Bauchner H. Dating violence among adolescents presenting to a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165:1101.
  30. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident, and offender characteristics. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf (Accessed on April 28, 2011).
  31. Vicary JR, Klingman LR, Harkness WL. Risk factors associated with date rape and sexual assault of adolescent girls. Adolescence 1995; 18:289.
  32. Tharp AT, DeGue S, Valle LA, et al. A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration. Trauma Violence Abuse 2013; 14:133.
  33. Mandoki CA, Burkhart BR. Sexual victimization: is there a vicious cycle? Violence Vict 1989; 4:179.
  34. Wyatt GE, Guthrie D, Notgrass CM. Differential effects of women's child sexual abuse and subsequent sexual revictimization. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60:167.
  35. Watts WD, Ellis AM. Sexual abuse and drinking and drug use: implications for prevention. J Drug Educ 1993; 23:183.
  36. Dembo R, Williams L, Wothke W, et al. The role of family factors, physical abuse, and sexual victimization experiences in high-risk youths' alcohol and other drug use and delinquency: a longitudinal model. Violence Vict 1992; 7:245.
  37. Basile KC, Black MC, Simon TR, et al. The association between self-reported lifetime history of forced sexual intercourse and recent health-risk behaviors: findings from the 2003 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey. J Adolesc Health 2006; 39:752.e1.
  38. Champion HL, Foley KL, DuRant RH, et al. Adolescent sexual victimization, use of alcohol and other substances, and other health risk behaviors. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35:321.
  39. Burt MR. Cultural myths and supports for rape. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980; 38:217.
  40. Synovitz LB, Byrne TJ. Antecedents of sexual victimization: factors discriminating victims from nonvictims. J Am Coll Health 1998; 46:151.
  41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexual Violence: Risk and protective factors. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/sexualviolence/riskprotectivefactors.html (Accessed on September 27, 2018).
  42. Muelenhard CL, Linton MA. Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: incidence and risk factors. J Counsel Psychol 1987; 34:186.
  43. Koss MP, Leonard KE, Beezley DA, Oros CJ. Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discrimant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles 1985; 12:981.
  44. Ott MA. Examining the development and sexual behavior of adolescent males. J Adolesc Health 2010; 46:S3.
  45. Talbot KK, Neill KS, Rankin LL. Rape-accepting attitudes of university undergraduate students. J Forensic Nurs 2010; 6:170.
  46. Kaestle CE, Halpern CT, Brown JD. Music videos, pro wrestling, and acceptance of date rape among middle school males and females: an exploratory analysis. J Adolesc Health 2007; 40:185.
  47. Reyes HL, Foshee VA, Niolon PH, et al. Gender Role Attitudes and Male Adolescent Dating Violence Perpetration: Normative Beliefs as Moderators. J Youth Adolesc 2016; 45:350.
  48. Espelage DL, Basile KC, De La Rue L, Hamburger ME. Longitudinal Associations Among Bullying, Homophobic Teasing, and Sexual Violence Perpetration Among Middle School Students. J Interpers Violence 2015; 30:2541.
  49. Koss MP, Dinero TE. Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 528:133.
  50. Carr JL, Van Deusen KM. Risk factors for male sexual aggression on college campuses. J Fam Violence 2004; 19:279.
  51. Basow SA, Minieri A. "You owe me": effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. J Interpers Violence 2011; 26:479.
  52. Heerde JA, Scholes-Balog KE, Hemphill SA. Associations between youth homelessness, sexual offenses, sexual victimization, and sexual risk behaviors: a systematic literature review. Arch Sex Behav 2015; 44:181.
  53. Symons PY, Groër MW, Kepler-Youngblood P, Slater V. Prevalence and predictors of adolescent dating violence. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 1994; 7:14.
  54. Davis TC, Peck GQ, Storment JM. Acquaintance rape and the high school student. J Adolesc Health 1993; 14:220.
  55. Scott CS, Lefley HP, Hicks D. Potential risk factors for rape in three ethnic groups. Community Ment Health J 1993; 29:133.
  56. Rhynard J, Krebs M, Glover J. Sexual assault in dating relationships. J Sch Health 1997; 67:89.
  57. Harrington NT, Leitenberg H. Relationship between alcohol consumption and victim behaviors immediately preceding sexual aggression by an acquaintance. Violence Vict 1994; 9:315.
  58. Canterbury RJ, Grossman SJ, Lloyd E. Drinking behaviors and lifetime incidents of date rape among high school graduates upon entering college. Coll Student J 1993; 27:75.
  59. Abbey A. Acquaintance rape and alcohol consumption on college campuses: how are they linked? J Am Coll Health 1991; 39:165.
  60. Lawyer S, Resnick H, Bakanic V, et al. Forcible, drug-facilitated, and incapacitated rape and sexual assault among undergraduate women. J Am Coll Health 2010; 58:453.
  61. Abbey A, Zawacki T, Buck PO, et al. Alcohol and sexual assault. Alcohol Res Health 2001; 25:43.
  62. Du Mont J, Macdonald S, Rotbard N, et al. Factors associated with suspected drug-facilitated sexual assault. CMAJ 2009; 180:513.
  63. Fiorentin TR, Logan BK. Toxicological findings in 1000 cases of suspected drug facilitated sexual assault in the United States. J Forensic Leg Med 2019; 61:56.
  64. Wegner R, Pierce J, Abbey A. Relationship type and sexual precedence: their associations with characteristics of sexual assault perpetrators and incidents. Violence Against Women 2014; 20:1360.
  65. Rickert VI, Vaughan RD, Wiemann CM. Adolescent dating violence and date rape. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14:495.
  66. Abbey A. Alcohol-related sexual assault: a common problem among college students. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 2002; :118.
  67. Gross AM, Bennett T, Sloan L, et al. The impact of alcohol and alcohol expectancies on male perception of female sexual arousal in a date rape analog. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2001; 9:380.
  68. Abbey A, Ross LT, McDuffie D, McAuslan P. Alcohol and dating risk factors for sexual assault among college women. Psychol Women Q 1996; 20:147.
  69. Marx BP, Van Wie V, Gross AM. Date rape risk factors: a review and methodological critique of the literature. Aggres Violent Behav 1996; 1:27.
  70. Adams-Curtis LE, Forbes GB. College women's experiences of sexual coercion: a review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables. Trauma Violence Abuse 2004; 5:91.
  71. Romero-Sánchez M, Megías JL. Alcohol use as a strategy for obtaining nonconsensual sexual relations: incidence in Spanish university students and relation to rape myths acceptance. Span J Psychol 2010; 13:864.
  72. Davis KC, Stoner SA, Norris J, et al. Women's awareness of and discomfort with sexual assault cues: effects of alcohol consumption and relationship type. Violence Against Women 2009; 15:1106.
  73. Loiselle M, Fuqua WR. Alcohol's effects on women's risk detection in a date-rape vignette. J Am Coll Health 2007; 55:261.
  74. Du Mont J, Macdonald S, Rotbard N, et al. Drug-facilitated sexual assault in Ontario, Canada: toxicological and DNA findings. J Forensic Leg Med 2010; 17:333.
  75. Hindmarch I, ElSohly M, Gambles J, Salamone S. Forensic urinalysis of drug use in cases of alleged sexual assault. J Clin Forensic Med 2001; 8:197.
  76. Center for Substance Abuse Research. Flunitrazepam (Rohypnol) www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/drugs/rohypnol.asp (Accessed on April 21, 2011).
  77. Rickert VI, Wiemann CM, Berenson AB. Prevalence, patterns, and correlates of voluntary flunitrazepam Use. Pediatrics 1999; 103:E6.
  78. Center for Substance Abuse Research. Ecstasy. www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/drugs/ecstasy.asp (Accessed on April 21, 2011).
  79. Burgess GH. Assessment of rape-supportive attitudes and beliefs in college men: development, reliability, and validity of the rape attitudes and beliefs scale. J Interpers Violence 2007; 22:973.
  80. Goodchilds JD, Zellman GL, Johnson PB, Giarrusso R. Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In: Rape and sexual assault II, Burgess A (Ed), Garland Publishing, 1988.
  81. Hall ER. Adolescents' perceptions of sexual assault. J Sex Educat Ther 1987; 13:37.
  82. Cassidy L, Hurrell RM. The influence of victim's attire on adolescents' judgments of date rape. Adolescence 1995; 30:319.
  83. Feltey KM, Ainslie JJ, Geib A. Sexual coercion attitudes among high school students: the influence of gender and rape education. Youth Society 1991; 23:229.
  84. Winslett AH, Gross AM. Sexual boundaries: an examination of the importance of talking before touching. Violence Against Women 2008; 14:542.
  85. Muehlenhard CL, McNaughton JS. Women's beliefs about women who "lead men on". J Soc Clin Psychol 1988; 7:65.
  86. Orchowski LM, Untied AS, Gidycz CA. Factors associated with college women's labeling of sexual victimization. Violence Vict 2013; 28:940.
  87. Moreau C, Li M, De Meyer S, et al. Measuring gender norms about relationships in early adolescence: Results from the global early adolescent study. SSM Popul Health 2019; 7:014.
  88. Rickert VI VI, Neal WP, Wiemann CM, Berenson AB. Prevalence and predictors of low sexual assertiveness. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2000; 13:88.
  89. Heise L, Moore K, Toubia N. Defining "coercion" and "consent" cross-culturally. SIECUS Rep 1996; 24:12.
  90. Lotte IL. Sexual socialization and attitudes toward rape. In: Rape and sexual assault II, Burgess A (Ed), Garland Publishing, New York 1988. p.193.
  91. Giacci E, Straits KJE, Gelman A, et al. Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence, Reproductive Coercion, and Reproductive Health Among American Indian and Alaska Native Women: A Narrative Interview Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2022; 31:13.
  92. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatric Patient Education. Connected Kids (Violence Prevention). https://patiented.solutions.aap.org/Handout-Collection.aspx?categoryid=32034 (Accessed on March 15, 2017).
  93. Miller E, Goldstein S, McCauley HL, et al. A school health center intervention for abusive adolescent relationships: a cluster RCT. Pediatrics 2015; 135:76.
  94. Rickert VI, Vaughan RD, Wiemann CM. Violence against young women: implications for clinicians. Contemp Ob Gyn 2003; 48:30.
  95. Lonsway KA. Preventing acquaintance rape through education. Psychol Women Q 1996; 20:229.
  96. Sionéan C, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, et al. Psychosocial and behavioral correlates of refusing unwanted sex among African-American adolescent females. J Adolesc Health 2002; 30:55.
  97. Testa M, Hoffman JH, Livingston JA, Turrisi R. Preventing college women's sexual victimization through parent based intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Sci 2010; 11:308.
  98. Rothman EF, Miller E, Terpeluk A, et al. The proportion of U.S. parents who talk with their adolescent children about dating abuse. J Adolesc Health 2011; 49:216.
  99. Craig ME. Coercive sexuality in dating relationships: a situational model. Clin Psychol Rev 1990; 10:395.
  100. Fantasia HC, Fontenot HB. The sexual safety of adolescents. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2011; 40:217.
  101. ACOG educational bulletin. Adolescent victims of sexual assault. Number 252, October 1998. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999; 64:195.
  102. Carter DL, Prentky R, Burgess A. Victim response strategies in sexual assault. In: Rape and sexual assault II, Burgess A (Ed), Garland Publishing, New York 1988. p.105.
  103. Gilmore AK, Maples-Keller JL, Pinsky HT, et al. Is the Use of Protective Behavioral Strategies Associated With College Sexual Assault Victimization? A Prospective Examination. J Interpers Violence 2018; 33:2664.
  104. DeGue S, Valle LA, Holt MK, et al. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggress Violent Behav 2014; 19:346.
  105. Wolfe DA, Crooks C, Jaffe P, et al. A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163:692.
  106. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Greene WF, et al. The Safe Dates program: 1-year follow-up results. Am J Public Health 2000; 90:1619.
  107. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Ennett ST, et al. Assessing the long-term effects of the Safe Dates program and a booster in preventing and reducing adolescent dating violence victimization and perpetration. Am J Public Health 2004; 94:619.
  108. Hanson KA, Gidycz CA. Evaluation of a sexual assault prevention program. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61:1046.
  109. Gray MD, Lester D, Quinn E, Bounds C. The effectiveness of personalizing acquaintance rape prevention: programs on perception of vulnerability and on reducing risk-behavior. J Student Dev 1990; 31:217.
  110. Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Barata PC, et al. Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:2326.
  111. Orchowski LM, Gidycz CA, Raffle H. Evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction and self-defense program: A prospective analysis of a revised protocol. Psychol Women Q 2008; 32:204.
  112. Gidycz CA, Rich CL, Orchowski L, et al. The evaluation of a sexual assault self-defense and risk-reduction program for college women: a prospective study. Psychol Women Q 2006; 30:173.
  113. Gidycz CA, Lynn SJ, Rich CL, et al. The evaluation of a sexual assault risk reduction program: a multisite investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69:1073.
  114. Hanson KA, Gidycyz CA. An empirical evaluation of a program designed to reduce the risk of multiple sexual victimization. J Interpers Violence 1998; 13:472.
  115. Schewe PA, O'Donohue W. Rape prevention with high-risk males: short-term outcome of two interventions. Arch Sex Behav 1996; 25:455.
  116. Foubert JD, Godin EE, Tatum JL. In their own words: sophomore college men describe attitude and behavior changes resulting from a rape prevention program 2 years after their participation. J Interpers Violence 2010; 25:2237.
  117. Miller E, Tancredi DJ, McCauley HL, et al. "Coaching boys into men": a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating violence prevention program. J Adolesc Health 2012; 51:431.
  118. Miller E, Tancredi DJ, McCauley HL, et al. One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2013; 45:108.
  119. Miller E, Jones KA, Ripper L, et al. An Athletic Coach-Delivered Middle School Gender Violence Prevention Program: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2020; 174:241.
  120. Jaffe PG, Sudermann M, Reitzel D, Killip SM. An evaluation of a secondary school primary prevention program on violence in intimate relationships. Violence Vict 1992; 7:129.
  121. Vladutiu CJ, Martin SL, Macy RJ. College- or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: a review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma Violence Abuse 2011; 12:67.
  122. Peterson K, Sharps P, Banyard V, et al. An Evaluation of Two Dating Violence Prevention Programs on a College Campus. J Interpers Violence 2016.
  123. Alegría-Flores K, Raker K, Pleasants RK, et al. Preventing Interpersonal Violence on College Campuses: The Effect of One Act Training on Bystander Intervention. J Interpers Violence 2015.
  124. Coker AL, Fisher BS, Bush HM, et al. Evaluation of the Green Dot Bystander Intervention to Reduce Interpersonal Violence Among College Students Across Three Campuses. Violence Against Women 2015; 21:1507.
  125. Coker AL, Bush HM, Fisher BS, et al. Multi-College Bystander Intervention Evaluation for Violence Prevention. Am J Prev Med 2016; 50:295.
  126. Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Hardin J, Berkowitz A. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16:e203.
  127. Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Schipani-McLaughlin AM. Theoretical Mediators of RealConsent: A Web-Based Sexual Violence Prevention and Bystander Education Program. Health Educ Behav 2019; 46:79.
Topic 14315 Version 37.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟