ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Hospital accreditation, accommodations, and staffing for care of the bariatric surgical patient

Hospital accreditation, accommodations, and staffing for care of the bariatric surgical patient
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Apr 01, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Obesity is defined as body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2. Obesity is increasing in prevalence in the United States (US), Canada, and worldwide [1-4]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 42.4 percent of the US population has obesity [5]. The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) reports that the number of bariatric surgeries performed annually continues to rise in the US [6]. (See "Obesity in adults: Prevalence, screening, and evaluation", section on 'Screening'.)

This topic review will focus on the criteria for accreditation as a Center of Excellence in bariatric care and the structural adjustments, appropriate allied health staffing, and training that are necessary for a facility to properly accommodate bariatric surgical patients. The general approach to the management of obesity and a description of the operations, indications and preoperative preparation, and outcomes are discussed elsewhere.

(See "Obesity in adults: Overview of management".)

(See "Bariatric surgery for management of obesity: Indications and preoperative preparation".)

(See "Bariatric procedures for the management of severe obesity: Descriptions".)

(See "Outcomes of bariatric surgery".)

CRITICAL REVIEW — The criteria for designation as a United States (US) bariatric Center of Excellence (COE) discussed in this topic are the best practices for bariatric surgical care. They represent the guidelines endorsed by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and follow the criteria established for a US bariatric COE. We advise that hospitals that perform bariatric surgery be accredited as at this time accreditation is the best approach to ensure adherence to these criteria, which are associated with improved patient outcomes. (See 'Criteria for accreditation' below.)

In 2006, prompted by concern regarding perioperative safety, the US Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) had restricted coverage of bariatric surgery to hospitals designated as COEs [7-9]. These criteria were scrutinized in a retrospective, longitudinal study that included outcomes data on Medicare patients undergoing bariatric surgical procedures before (n = 6723) and after (n = 15,854) implementation of the policy and found no significant differences for any complication (8.0 versus 7.0 percent), serious complication (3.3 versus 3.6 percent), or reoperation (1.0 versus 1.1 percent) [10]. In addition, hospitals designated as COEs (n = 179) had similar outcomes data as hospitals without COE accreditation (n = 519), including rates of serious complications (2.2 versus 2.5 percent, respectively). Hence, in light of equivalent complication rates, the CMS has decided not to require COE accreditation for hospitals that perform bariatric surgery for Medicare patients [11]. This decision was made, at least in part, to ensure that Medicare patients would not have limited access to bariatric surgical care.

By contrast, a 2016 systematic review identified 13 studies that examined the impact of bariatric accreditation on surgical outcomes in over 1.5 million patients [12]. Overall, 10 of 13 studies reported benefit associated with achieving COE accreditation. A mortality benefit for COEs over nonaccredited facilities was reported by six of eight studies, with odds ratios ranging from 2.26 to 3.57. Similarly, morbidity benefit was reported by 8 of 11 studies, with odds ratios ranging from 1.09 to 1.39.

As such, the CMS decision has been evaluated and strongly criticized by several surgical societies that include the ACS, the ASMBS, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, the Obesity Society, and the American Society of Bariatric Physicians [13]. The criticism of the societies is based upon the consensus that CMS used flawed data to arrive at its conclusions. The rationale for not accepting the CMS new course of action includes:

Outcomes – The outcomes data referenced by the CMS did not compare the potentially sicker population of Medicare patients who typically are older and have multiple comorbid illnesses. In addition, a cohort study using nationwide Medicare data (n = 47,030) comparing pre-COE and post-COE designation requirements for 90 day outcomes found a 50 percent reduction in mortality, 25 percent reduction in readmission rate, 20 percent reduction in costs, and 33 percent reduction in reoperation rate [14]. While some of the improvements may be secondary to the change in procedures performed pre- and post-COE designation requirement, such as the introduction of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure to the open and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures in the post-era, the post-COE designation cohort was comprised of more patients over age 65 years with more comorbidities. Other studies also suggest that accredited centers continue to have better outcomes and lower mortality rates than do nonaccredited centers [15]. (See "Bariatric procedures for the management of severe obesity: Descriptions".)

Volume – Volume alone does not improve outcomes, as high-volume accredited centers report a lower mortality rate compared with low-volume centers as well as high-volume nonaccredited hospitals. In a retrospective review of 277,760 laparoscopic stapling bariatric surgical procedures performed between 2006 and 2010, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher in low-volume centers (<50 stapling cases/year) compared with high-volume centers (0.17 versus 0.07 percent) [16]. In addition, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the accredited high-volume centers compared with nonaccredited high-volume centers (0.06 versus 0.22 percent). The mortality rates between nonaccredited high-volume centers and low-volume centers was equivalent; hence, the impact of accreditation may be more substantial than volume alone.

Access – The concern that accreditation would limit access to bariatric surgical care is unfounded. There is no documented evidence that Medicare patients are denied access to accredited centers. Since the initial requirement for COE hospital accreditation, the number of procedures for Medicare beneficiaries has increased [10,14]. The literature does not support the notion that COE accreditation limits access for patients [17].

Safety – A major benefit of the hospital COE designation requirement is the ability to collect and analyze data to improve patient safety and outcomes on a national level. Without the COE designation, access to data on this large scale would be extremely difficult. In addition, at this time it is unclear how the private payers (private insurers) will proceed or how access to accredited or nonaccredited centers will be affected with the US Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Access to health care is anticipated to expand in the US because of the ACA, and hence, the number of bariatric procedures performed is most likely to increase. The patient safety concern is that bariatric operations performed at nonaccredited hospitals will continue to have higher mortality rates, independent of volume, as well as higher reoperation rates and higher costs. In addition, Medicare and privately insured patients may not have access to allied health care professionals who provide nutritional, lifestyle, and psychologic counseling and postoperative follow-up that are standard of care in accredited centers. (See 'Commitment to high-quality care and the role of allied health care personnel' below.)

Adhering to the standards for the best practices outlined by the ACS and the ASMBS is more important than the official designation as an accredited COE. If there is an institutional commitment to these practices, then, most likely, outcomes will be equivalent to those of the accredited hospitals. However, the accreditation process is the best approach to determine if an individual hospital adheres to the best practice guidelines; it is also the best approach for monitoring individual institutional performance and patient outcomes with the added benefit of comparison to national standards and outcomes data.

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITATION — The American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) have combined their recommendations and criteria for bariatric Centers of Excellence into the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBS-AQIP) in order to provide a single resource of the best practices for obesity care for providers and hospitals [18]. Patient accommodations should be included in every part of the hospital, including outpatient clinics, radiology, the operating room, and the nursing floors. Thus, new guidelines for the design and construction of health care facilities now include bariatric-specific design considerations [19].

The guidelines include monitoring patient outcomes for COE reaccreditation every three years.

The 2012 goals of MBS-AQIP include:

Accredit metabolic and bariatric surgery programs according to outcomes-based standards

Establish national/regional and state collaborative to improve care

Decrease morbidity by 50 percent in the next five years

Improve the value of metabolic surgery by increasing safety, improving efficacy, and decreasing the cost of health care

Share best practices

The accreditation process includes credentialing surgeons, creating a national data registry of 100 percent of cases done by the accredited facilities, and performing bariatric center site visits. The criteria also include establishing a national collaborative network to include outreach to payers and patients centered on safety. The seven core standards for accreditation under MBS-AQIP are case volume, commitment to quality care, data collection, critical care support, appropriate equipment and instruments, continuum of care, and continuous quality improvement process [12,20].

Surgeons and case volume — The 2012 ACS/ASMBS guidelines for credentialing bariatric surgeons include:

Hospital privileges to perform gastrointestinal and advanced laparoscopic operations. The hospital must perform 50 bariatric stapling procedures annually in a comprehensive center. In a low-acuity center, 25 bariatric procedures are required annually.

Formal didactic training in bariatric procedures with documentation.

If no formal training, documented experience in bariatric surgery, such as case logs or participation in a Center of Excellence program.

Participation in the bariatric surgery service call schedule so that surgical coverage is provided 24 hours per day, 7 days per week for bariatric patients. If a bariatric surgeon is not available at a local hospital where bariatric surgery is performed, that accredited center is required to provide coverage through another hospital.

Bariatric Continued Medical Education (CME) of a minimum of eight hours every two years.

Call coverage — It is expected that accredited hospitals providing bariatric surgery will provide call coverage by a bariatric surgeon for any bariatric patient who presents to its facility even if that center or surgeon did not perform the principal bariatric procedure. General surgeons can be used in lieu of or in conjunction with bariatric surgeons if they are credentialed with general surgery privileges and they undergo training so they are familiar with the bariatric procedures performed at their center, the signs and symptoms of postoperative complications, and the center's clinical care pathways.

Facilities/equipment/instruments — Appropriate adjustments for patients with obesity should be made in all areas where patient care is given. The following are guidelines for the essential requirements for most bariatric patients. For the rare patient whose body mass index (BMI) is over 60 kg/m2, a protocol should be in place regarding where to rent or lease equipment [21]. Hospitals that are performing bariatric surgery should ensure that all of the minimum recommendations are followed [22].

Nursing floors and space — Structural changes may require major reconstruction to make sure that all areas of the hospital can accommodate the larger stretchers and wheelchairs used to transport patients [23]. The Facility Guidelines Institute recommends the following dimensions for hospitals that care for bariatric patients [19]:

Building entry points should have door widths with a minimum of 3 feet 2 inches.

Ample-sized wheelchairs should be available at the front door of the hospital. (See 'Wheelchairs and chairs' below.)

Public toilets as well as waiting rooms should be constructed for the needs of patients. (See 'Toilets' below.)

Clearance of 5 feet should be provided on both sides of each bed and at the foot of the bed between patient beds to allow for staff assistance.

Bathroom doors should be at least 3 feet 9 inches wide.

Patient room doors should be at least 4 feet 4 inches wide to allow for the passage of stretchers.

Corridor hallways should be 5 feet wide.

Beds — Most regular hospitals beds can handle patients up to 440 lbs; however, these beds are probably too narrow at 35 to 36 inches, making it difficult for bariatric patients to reach the adjustment buttons or operate the side rails [24]. Bariatric beds should be at least 44 inches wide and support up to 1000 lbs. The mattresses should be the low air loss type so patients will not tend to sink in their beds [25]. The low air loss mattresses make it easier for patients to get out of bed and thus assist with preventing skin breakdown. It is optimal if the beds can be automatically adjusted into a chair position so patients can walk out of their beds from the seated position [25].

Walkers — Walkers should be at least 28 inches wide and support up to 750 lbs.

Toilets — Floor-mounted toilets help prevent patient falls and damage to the facilities. Floor-mounted bariatric toilets can support up to 1000 lbs (453 kg), while most standard wall-mounted commodes have a 250 lb weight limit [26]. Toilets should have enough room to allow a person on each side of the commode to assist with the transfer of a bariatric patient on and off the toilet. In addition, handrails should be placed on the walls so that patients can lift themselves onto and up from the toilet. Often these toilets need to be set 24 inches off a wall with handrails, which is 6 inches further than the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) act requirements. Patients who weigh over 500 pounds cannot sit comfortably on a standard toilet, because it is too close to the wall.

Appropriately sized bedside commodes are also necessary for patients who cannot ambulate safely to the bathroom.

Showers — To accommodate bariatric patients, shower stalls should be 4 x 5 ft (1.2 m x 1.5 m) rather than the standard 3 x 3 ft (0.9 m x 0.9 m), and handheld nozzles should be mounted on the sidewalls of the shower rather than the back so they are easier to reach and use.

Patient lifts — Patient lifts are essential for moving bariatric patients and need to be ceiling mounted. Most standard lifts can accommodate up to 600 lbs, while the bariatric ones can handle up to 1000 lbs [25]. The use of proper lifting equipment protects staff from injury and is safer for patients [27].

Wheelchairs and chairs — Bariatric wheelchairs should be 30 to 39 inches wide and be able to accommodate up to 800 lbs.

Monitoring and safety devices — Immediate postoperative bariatric patients should be placed in a monitored setting because tachycardia and respiratory distress are two of the most sensitive symptoms of a gastrointestinal leak [28] and other complications. Extra wide blood pressure cuffs, appropriately sized sequential compression devices, biphasic defibrillators, and emergency airway equipment should be readily available [24]. Because obstructive sleep apnea is often diagnosed in this population, continuous positive airway pressure devices (CPAP) should be available [29]. (See "Postoperative management of adults with obstructive sleep apnea".)

Operating rooms — A bariatric operating room (OR) should be 600 square feet. According to the Association of Operating Room Nurses (AORN) bariatric surgery guidelines, OR bariatric beds should have the capacity to hold 1000 lbs with 600 lbs tilt capacity [30]. The OR tables should also have side extenders, footboards, sufficient arm holders, and foam padding available for the arms, heels, and feet to prevent falls and pressure injuries [30]. Because bariatric patients are not likely to be able to transfer themselves after recently having had general anesthesia, lifts or other appropriate moving devices, like an air mattress, should be utilized to facilitate easy transfer [30]. The use of such devices can enable the OR staff to transfer extremely large patients with little risk to themselves or the patients.

Long laparoscopic equipment (defined as 43 to 46 cm) should be available, as well as long open surgical instruments and deep and wide retractors, in case conversion to an open laparotomy is required [24]. In addition, specially designed endotracheal tubes should be available. (See "Anesthesia for the patient with obesity" and "Airway management in the morbidly obese patient for emergency medicine and critical care".)

Other supplies — Appropriately sized bariatric gowns and robes, recliners, and stretchers must be available for patients with obesity.

Radiology — Because bariatric patients may need to undergo radiologic procedures, a facility must have radiology equipment that can accommodate these patients within 60 minutes [24]. To evaluate for leak, most bariatric surgeons will opt for a fluoroscopic upper gastrointestinal series or a computed tomography (CT) scan with oral contrast. Bariatric patients should not be asked to ingest several hundred milliliters of contrast. Most studies can be effectively done with 100 milliliters taken just prior to lying down for the studies. Most CT scanners have a weight limit of 400 lbs, which should be enough for most bariatric patients, although scanners with a weight capacity of 600 lbs are available [24]. However, standard fluoroscopic units usually have a weight limit of 300 to 350 lbs and have only 45 to 50 cm of clearance between the tabletop and the image intensifier, and 70 cm is recommended for bariatric patients [24]. Large round hoops can be employed to measure the patient before transport to ensure that the patient will fit in the imaging apparatus [31]. If the facilities for CT scan or fluoroscopy cannot accommodate the patient, then the best option to effectively rule out a leak is a laparoscopy or laparotomy. (See "Imaging studies after bariatric surgery" and "Bariatric operations: Early (fewer than 30 days) morbidity and mortality".)

Commitment to high-quality care and the role of allied health care personnel — Allied health care personnel are vital members of the multidisciplinary team that provides optimal care of the bariatric patient. The multidisciplinary team role is included in preoperative, in-hospital, and long-term education and management. COEs must have a metabolic and bariatric surgery committee consisting of director, coordinator, clinical reviewer, administrative representation, and all providers who perform procedures treating metabolic or obesity-related diseases.  

Sensitivity training — While severe obesity is present in over 30 percent of our population today, there is still a prejudice against these patients, which may negatively affect patient care [32]. In one survey, 48 percent of nurses responded that they felt "uncomfortable caring for obese patients" [32]. Accordingly, all health care personnel should undergo sensitivity training to promote awareness of bias against patients with obesity [33]. It is unclear if such training has improved nurses' attitudes [34], and most clinicians still feel that obesity is a lifestyle choice instead of a disease [35].

Nursing — Nurses working with bariatric surgical patients benefit from education regarding the proper use of bariatric equipment and lifting techniques to help prevent injuries [31], medication administration after bariatric surgery [33], and training in the recognition of common complications in the postoperative period [33,36]. The ASMBS has developed a certification program for Clinical Bariatric Nurse Specialists. In addition, the ASMBS, the AORN, and the Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety and Medical Error Reduction publish bariatric surgical nursing guidelines to address nursing education, practices, and certification goals in an effort to improve care and reduce nursing apprehension about bariatric care [30,37,38].

Appropriate nursing care for bariatric patients requires inspection and cleansing of skin folds every shift to avoid skin irritation and fungal infections. It may require two nurses instead of one to help a patient bathe or get out of bed to a chair. Caring for bariatric patients without appropriate staffing or equipment can result in injury to the provider, lost days of work, and loss of income for the hospital and the worker. Musculoskeletal injuries are the leading category of occupational injury in health care [27,39]. (See "Occupational low back pain: Evaluation and management" and "Disability assessment and determination in the United States".)

Nutrition — Registered dietitians (RDs) are essential for the appropriate inpatient care and long-term follow-up of bariatric patients. RDs should work with the hospital food service department to develop post-bariatric surgery meals that are high in protein and low in carbohydrates and fat in the appropriate portion sizes, ensuring that if a "regular" diet is ordered for a post-bariatric patient, a proper diet is delivered. Bariatric-specific diets can be especially helpful in the immediate postoperative period when the recommendations are for clear liquids and full liquids, ensuring that the meals are augmented with protein drinks to ensure adequate protein intake. RDs can help prepare bariatric patients for the postoperative diet changes by educating patients on portion control and maintenance of adequate nutrition. Without such education, patients may eat more fat and calories than they realize. Specifics of diet information and supplementation after bariatric surgical procedures are detailed in the tables and discussed in detail elsewhere (table 1 and table 2 and table 3). (See "Bariatric surgery: Postoperative nutritional management".)

All bariatric patients, and especially those who have had bypass procedures, are at risk for malnutrition and should be evaluated for these possible deficiencies. The lifelong incidence of malnutrition after weight loss surgery can be as high as 44 percent and can occur many years after the procedure [40]. This is usually a consequence of poor eating habits. In addition, patients do not always understand the need for careful, long-term follow-up and may not be taking vitamins or may be taking the wrong doses or types of nutrient and vitamin supplementation for the type of bariatric surgical procedure they underwent. In one study of 133 admissions of patients who had undergone a bariatric procedure, only 33 percent of these patients were taking a multivitamin [41]. The diagnosis and management of nutritional deficiencies after bariatric surgery is discussed elsewhere. (See "Bariatric surgery: Postoperative nutritional management", section on 'Micronutrient management'.)

Pharmacy — The pharmacy staff should be consulted about weight-based dosing for bariatric surgical patients, medications to avoid, and appropriate medication formulation. Bariatric patients can potentially have problems with medications that are not easily absorbed or are contraindicated after a malabsorptive procedure. In a study of 133 hospital admissions for patients after bariatric procedures, almost 62 percent of patients were given inappropriate medications [41]. In addition, some medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are contraindicated after gastric bypass [42]. (See "Bariatric surgery: Postoperative nutritional management" and "Intensive care unit management of patients with obesity", section on 'Drug therapies'.)

Physical therapy — Physical therapists can help enable bariatric surgery patients to improve functional status after bariatric surgery and reach an appropriate level of activity to correspond with their dietary intake [43-45]. As an example, for patients with high protein consumption, moderate levels of exercise are more appropriate because a high-protein diet lowers the respiratory quotient, while strenuous exercise demands a high respiratory quotient [46]. (See "Exercise physiology" and "Obesity in adults: Role of physical activity and exercise".)

Psychology/social work services — The mental and emotional aspects of obesity, weight loss, and weight loss surgery are an important consideration in the care of bariatric patients. While 20 to 60 percent of bariatric patients have a psychiatric disorder noted preoperatively [47], some psychiatric disorders are diagnosed postoperatively [48,49]. In addition, while some psychiatric conditions are improved with weight loss, others are made worse or become apparent with weight loss.

Adequate time and attention should be provided for preoperative assessment of and support for psychological disorders. Psychiatric evaluation can assist with recognition and management of disorders that can lead to obesity like binge eating, nighttime eating, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, substance abuse, and even personality disorders. In addition, higher rates of suicide, substance abuse, and divorce after bariatric surgery have been documented when compared with the general population [49,50]. While none of these are a contraindication to surgery, these disorders should be controlled prior to undergoing surgical weight loss in an effort to reduce recidivism and produce greater sustained weight loss [47]. Even patients who are doing well physiologically and seemingly emotionally after bariatric surgery should be screened for adjustment disorders, substance abuse, and depression. (See "Eating disorders: Overview of epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnosis" and "Posttraumatic stress disorder in adults: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, assessment, and diagnosis" and "Unipolar depression in adults: Assessment and diagnosis" and "Substance use disorders: Clinical assessment" and "Suicidal ideation and behavior in adults".)

Critical care support — COEs must also have providers who are certified in Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support to care for potentially ill patients. COEs have to also have critical care and intensive care services, as well as endoscopic and diagnostic/interventional radiology services. For patients who may exceed these capabilities, COEs must have the ability to stabilize these patients with transfer agreements in place. If other services are required of the patients but not available at the COE hospital, then the COE must have access to those services (ie, nephrology).

Continuum of care — The concept of this tenet is to provide standardized pathways of care so that patients and providers are all aware of what care is provided and where along the pathway the patient is. The pathways are put into written protocols. These protocols include preoperative, intraoperative, and lifelong postoperative care.

Data collection — A data manager is required for a bariatric surgical program because the results and complications for weight loss surgery must be reported into specific computerized databases, according to criteria for a COE in bariatric surgery [7]. This allows the team to identify areas of care that need improvement and compare results with other facilities [23]. With the implementation of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBS-AQIP) database, 100 percent of bariatric surgery outcomes will be tracked for at least two years.

Continuous quality improvement — The hospital's metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) Committee is responsible for assessment of their program and implementing areas where they can improve. The database review of their MBS-AQIP data is very helpful in finding areas for improvement. The review will also address any adverse events and ways they can be prevented.

Cost — Making changes to accommodate patients with obesity can be expensive because bariatric equipment and supplies cost 25 to 30 percent more than traditionally sized items [51]. In addition, patients with obesity often require longer hospital stays, more clinical staff, and more costly interventions than patients who do not have obesity. Obesity-related conditions such as sleep apnea and diabetes also increase the cost of care. (See "Overweight and obesity in adults: Health consequences", section on 'Health care costs of obesity'.)

CENTER DESIGNATIONS

Comprehensive centers — Hospitals that meet all the accreditation criteria above and perform at least 50 stapling procedures annually are considered comprehensive centers. If a hospital provides adolescent bariatric surgery only, it can be considered a comprehensive center with adolescent qualifications. If it does both, it is considered a comprehensive center with adolescent and obesity medicine qualifications.

There are other definitions of bariatric centers that are recognized that do not meet all of the aforementioned requirements. They can still provide high-quality care if the criteria outlined by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBS-AQIP) standards are followed. Additionally, these centers will do 15 to 50 stapling procedures annually.

Lower-acuity centers — These hospitals will do at least 25 procedures annually on lower-acuity patients in adults with the following criteria:

Age 18 to 65

Body mass index (BMI) <55 for males and <60 for females

Patients will not have organ failure, significant cardiac or pulmonary impairment, an organ transplant, or be on the transplant list

Patients must be able to ambulate

Additionally, revisions are limited to adjustable gastric band (AGB) replacement, repositioning, or removal, but not other procedures. Emergency cases are allowed as needed.

Ambulatory surgery centers — These hospitals have similar criteria to lower-acuity centers but are allowed to convert AGBs to sleeves if they can document that they perform 50 stapling procedures per year. If they do not do such revisions, they need only to do 25 stapling procedures annually.

Adolescent centers — Such centers perform a minimum of 15 stapling procedures annually in the adolescent age group.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Bariatric surgery".)

SUMMARY

Obesity is increasing in prevalence in the United States and worldwide, leading to a steady and appreciable increase in obesity and bariatric procedures. (See 'Introduction' above.)

At this time, the Center of Excellence (COE) designation as an accredited hospital for bariatric care is the best approach for determining if a hospital adheres to best practice outlines endorsed by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Accredited hospitals have a lower mortality rate and lower reoperation rate when compared with nonaccredited high-volume and low-volume centers. (See 'Critical review' above.)

The ACS and the ASMBS have combined their recommendations and criteria for bariatric COEs into the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBS-AQIP) in order to provide a single resource for the best practices for obesity care for providers and hospitals. The goals include improving patient outcomes and bariatric surgeon skills. (See 'Criteria for accreditation' above.)

There are seven tenets of the MBS-AQIP COE criteria: surgeon volume, equipment and instruments, commitment to quality of care, critical care, continuum of care, data collection, and continuous quality improvement.

Adjustments in hospital facilities, including structural changes to accommodate larger stretchers and beds required for bariatric surgical patients, should be performed. (See 'Facilities/equipment/instruments' above.)

Allied health care personnel, including nurses, dieticians, pharmacists, physical therapists, psychologists, and social workers, are an integral component of the preoperative and postoperative education and management of bariatric patients. (See 'Commitment to high-quality care and the role of allied health care personnel' above.)

While severe obesity is present in over 30 percent of our population today, there is still a prejudice against these patients, which may negatively affect patient care. Thus, all health care personnel should recognize that obesity is a disease and should undergo training to promote awareness of bias against individuals with obesity. (See 'Sensitivity training' above.)

Making staffing and facility changes to accommodate patients with obesity can be expensive because increased staffing is necessary and bariatric equipment and supplies cost 25 to 30 percent more than traditionally sized items. However, caring for bariatric patients without appropriate staffing or equipment can result in patient injury as well as injury to the provider, lost days of work, and loss of income for the hospital and the worker. (See 'Cost' above.)

There are other recognized centers that meet the standards for being considered a COE. They are lower-acuity centers and ambulatory surgery centers that have criteria for the kinds of patients they can treat and the kinds of surgery they can perform.

  1. Global prevalence of adult obesity - Country rankings 2010. Source: International Obesity Taskforce, International Association for the Study of Obesity. Available at: www.allcountries.org/ranks/global_prevalence_of_adult_obesity.html (Accessed on September 01, 2017).
  2. Peeters A, Barendregt JJ, Willekens F, et al. Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:24.
  3. Vlad I. Obesity costs UK economy 2bn pounds sterling a year. BMJ 2003; 327:1308.
  4. Duda RB, Darko R, Adanu RMK, et al. Prevalence of Obesity in an Urban West African Population: Results of the Women’s Health Study of Accra. African J Health Sciences 2007; 14:154.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adult Obesity Facts. Page last reviewed February 27, 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html (Accessed on May 11, 2020).
  6. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011-2018. Available at: asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers (Accessed on May 11, 2020).
  7. Pratt GM, McLees B, Pories WJ. The ASBS Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence program: a blueprint for quality improvement. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2006; 2:497.
  8. Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JA, et al. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005; 294:1903.
  9. Nguyen NT, Paya M, Stevens CM, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg 2004; 240:586.
  10. Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, et al. Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA 2013; 309:792.
  11. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Decision memo for bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity - Facility certification requirement (CAG-00250R3). Available at: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NCAId=266&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery (Accessed on May 12, 2020).
  12. Azagury D, Morton JM. Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in US Accredited vs Non-Accredited Centers: A Systematic Review. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 223:469.
  13. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). ASMBS comment to CMS on accreditation. re: CAG-00250R3 (National coverage for bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity-Facility certification requirement). July 26, 2013. Available at: asmbs.org/2013/08/asmbs-comment-to-cms-on-accreditation (Accessed on November 07, 2013).
  14. Flum DR, Kwon S, MacLeod K, et al. The use, safety and cost of bariatric surgery before and after Medicare's national coverage decision. Ann Surg 2011; 254:860.
  15. Telem DA, Talamini M, Altieri M, et al. The effect of national hospital accreditation in bariatric surgery on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; 11:749.
  16. Jafari MD, Jafari F, Young MT, et al. Volume and outcome relationship in bariatric surgery in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:4539.
  17. Bae J, Shade J, Abraham A, et al. Effect of Mandatory Centers of Excellence Designation on Demographic Characteristics of Patients Who Undergo Bariatric Surgery. JAMA Surg 2015; 150:644.
  18. American College of Surgeons (ACS). Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip (Accessed on May 12, 2020).
  19. Facility Guidelines Institute. Available at: https://fgiguidelines.org/ (Accessed on May 12, 2020).
  20. American College of Surgeons. MBSAQIP Standards—Effective October 2019. Optimal Resources for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Available at: https://www.facs.org/-/media/files/quality-programs/bariatric/2019_mbsaqip_standards_manual.ashx (Accessed on May 11, 2020).
  21. McCleerey M. Equipment considerations. In: Obesity surgery: Patient safety and best practices, Jones SB, Jones DB (Eds), Cine-Med, Woodbury, CT 2009. p.167.
  22. Kaufman AS, McNelis J, Slevin M, La Marca C. Bariatric surgery claims - a medico-legal perspective. Obes Surg 2006; 16:1555.
  23. Robinson M. The cost of setting up a bariatric surgery program. In: Obesity surgery: Patient safety and best practices, Jones SB, Jones DB (Eds), Cine-Med, Woodbury, CT 2009. p.151.
  24. Lautz DB, Jiser ME, Kelly JJ, et al. An update on best practice guidelines for specialized facilities and resources necessary for weight loss surgical programs. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; 17:911.
  25. Muir M, Heese GA, McLean D, et al. Handling of the bariatric patient in critical care: a case study of lessons learned. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2007; 19:223.
  26. Equipping your facility for bariatric patients. Healthc Hazard Manage Monit 2008; 22:1.
  27. Ngan K, Drebit S, Siow S, et al. Risks and causes of musculoskeletal injuries among health care workers. Occup Med (Lond) 2010; 60:389.
  28. Hamilton EC, Sims TL, Hamilton TT, et al. Clinical predictors of leak after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:679.
  29. Kaw R, Gali B, Collop NA. Perioperative care of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011; 13:496.
  30. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses. AORN bariatric surgery guideline. AORN J 2004; 79:1026.
  31. Leen MP. Establishing a comprehensive bariatric protocol. Nurs Manage 2010; 41:47.
  32. Ide P, Farber ES, Lautz D. Perioperative nursing care of the bariatric surgical patient. AORN J 2008; 88:30.
  33. Mulligan AT, McNamara AM, Boulton HW, et al. Best practice updates for nursing care in weight loss surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; 17:895.
  34. Gujral H, Tea C, Sheridan M. Evaluation of nurse's attitudes toward adult patients of size. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011; 7:536.
  35. Salinas GD, Glauser TA, Williamson JC, et al. Primary care physician attitudes and practice patterns in the management of obese adults: results from a national survey. Postgrad Med 2011; 123:214.
  36. Lim RB, Blackburn GL, Jones DB. Benchmarking best practices in weight loss surgery. Curr Probl Surg 2010; 47:79.
  37. Berger NK, Carr JJ, Erickson J, et al. Path to bariatric nurse certification: the practice analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2010; 6:399.
  38. Mulligan A, Young LS, Randall S, et al. Best practices for perioperative nursing care for weight loss surgery patients. Obes Res 2005; 13:267.
  39. Morse T, Fekieta R, Rubenstein H, et al. "Doing the heavy lifting: health care workers take back their backs". New Solut 2008; 18:207.
  40. Alvarez-Leite JI. Nutrient deficiencies secondary to bariatric surgery. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2004; 7:569.
  41. Lizer MH, Papageorgeon H, Glembot TM. Nutritional and pharmacologic challenges in the bariatric surgery patient. Obes Surg 2010; 20:1654.
  42. Pitt TS, Brethauer, Schauer P. Laparoscopic gastric bypass. In: Obesity surgery: Patient safety and best practices, Jones SB, Jones DB (Eds), Cine-Med, Woodbury, CT 2009. p.267.
  43. Stegen S, Derave W, Calders P, et al. Physical fitness in morbidly obese patients: effect of gastric bypass surgery and exercise training. Obes Surg 2011; 21:61.
  44. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa M, Wilson SE. Quality of life. In: Obesity surgery: Patient safety and best practices, Cine-Med, Woodbury, CT 2009. p.403.
  45. Cheema BS, O'Sullivan AJ, Chan M, et al. Progressive resistance training during hemodialysis: rationale and method of a randomized-controlled trial. Hemodial Int 2006; 10:303.
  46. Petering R, Webb CW. Exercise, fluid, and nutrition recommendations for the postgastric bypass exerciser. Curr Sports Med Rep 2009; 8:92.
  47. Greenberg I, Sogg S, M Perna F. Behavioral and psychological care in weight loss surgery: best practice update. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; 17:880.
  48. Waters GS, Pories WJ, Swanson MS, et al. Long-term studies of mental health after the Greenville gastric bypass operation for morbid obesity. Am J Surg 1991; 161:154.
  49. Omalu BI, Cho P, Shakir AM, et al. Suicides following bariatric surgery for the treatment of obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005; 1:447.
  50. Bhatti JA, Nathens AB, Thiruchelvam D, et al. Self-harm Emergencies After Bariatric Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study. JAMA Surg 2016; 151:226.
  51. Rhea S. Making adjustments. Hospitals are carrying higher supply-chain costs related to larger numbers of obese patients, with much of that expense not being reimbursed. Mod Healthc 2010; 40:26.
Topic 14947 Version 19.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟