Version July 2025
INTRODUCTION —
Traumatic rib fractures are the consequence of significant forces impacting the chest wall and are most commonly due to blunt injuries (eg, motor vehicle crash, falls, assault), but penetrating injuries (eg, gunshot) can also fracture ribs. Rib fractures are a marker of more severe injuries and are present in 10 percent of all trauma patients and approximately 30 percent of patients with significant chest trauma [1]. The number of fractured ribs also directly correlates with the presence of intrathoracic injury [2,3].
Multiply fractured ribs or flail chest can significantly compromise respiratory function. Pneumonia is often the common pathway to acute respiratory failure resulting from rib fractures, and prevention offers the best means to avoid potentially preventable deaths [4]. The main goal of treatment is to prevent pneumonia and other complications of rib fractures (eg, nonunion). Conservative treatment includes pain control and aggressive supportive pulmonary care to avoid the need for intubation. For patients in whom these conservative measures are not adequate, rib fracture stabilization may be beneficial.
Although less common, chronic, forceful coughing, as may be seen in patients with severe asthma, cystic fibrosis, or poorly controlled emphysema, can also result in rib fractures [5]. General considerations for single or nontraumatic rib fractures are discussed separately. (See "Initial evaluation and management of rib fractures".)
This topic review will discuss inpatient management of multiple traumatic rib fractures. Specific techniques for surgical stabilization of rib fractures are reviewed separately. (See "Surgical management of severe rib fractures".)
TRAUMA EVALUATION —
The initial resuscitation, diagnostic evaluation, and management of the patient with blunt or penetrating injury is based upon protocols from the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program established by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. The initial resuscitation and evaluation of the patient with blunt or penetrating thoracic trauma is discussed in detail elsewhere.
●(See "Initial management of trauma in adults".)
●(See "Initial evaluation and management of blunt thoracic trauma in adults".)
●(See "Initial evaluation and management of penetrating thoracic trauma in adults".)
History and physical — In the setting of acute trauma, many patients cannot relate their symptoms or medical history due to altered mental status (eg, neurologic injury, intoxication) or because they are intubated and sedated. Every attempt should be made to identify preexisting medical conditions by contacting the patient's primary care physician or family members. The presence of significant medical comorbidities and medical conditions requiring antiplatelets or anticoagulation should be determined as these may impact management decisions.
Physical findings indicative of a rib fracture include rib pain on palpation, rib step-off on palpation (picture 1), and crepitus. A step-off may be noticed if the fracture segment is severely displaced, with one segment being depressed relative to the other. This may be difficult to assess in muscular or heavy-set individuals. The patient may also feel a sensation of clicking or movement with deep inspiration or with coughing/Valsalva maneuver. Multiple fractures may cause a visible chest wall deformity, and the presence of paradoxical respiratory motion, an area of the chest wall pulled in with inspiration and pushed out with expiration, is diagnostic for flail chest. (See 'Flail chest' below.)
Pneumothorax and hemothorax are often present initially, and their presence should prompt a careful review of all imaging studies for the presence of rib fractures. (See "Initial evaluation and management of rib fractures", section on 'Clinical Features'.)
Flail chest — Flail chest (ie, "stoved-in" chest, crushed chest) is defined as fractures of three or more ribs in two or more places, which create a floating segment that loses its mechanical continuity with the remainder of the chest wall (figure 1) [6]. Sternal flail occurs when the sternum becomes dissociated from the hemithoraces because of bilateral, multiple, anterior cartilage, or rib fractures. Sternal fracture may also accompany rib fractures. (See 'Sternal fracture' below.)
Flail chest occurs in 5 to 13 percent of patients with chest wall injury. A review of data from the National Trauma Data Bank noted that flail chest occurred in 1 percent of all admissions to levels 1 and 2 trauma centers included in the dataset [7].
Flail chest is most commonly due to a blunt mechanism of injury whereby significant force is imparted on the chest. Such scenarios can include a motor vehicle collision where the chest strikes the steering wheel, an automobile accident with a pedestrian or bicyclist, a fall from a height onto the chest, an ejection from a motor vehicle or motorcycle, or an assault with a blunt weapon such as a baseball bat. Although less common, flail chest following penetrating trauma (eg, shotgun blast) has been reported [8]. Because of the severe injury mechanisms associated with flail chest, pulmonary contusion is much more common compared with multiple rib fractures without flail, and these patients have a high risk for acute respiratory failure [9].
Flail chest is clinically diagnosed by the observation of paradoxical motion of the chest wall with respiration [10]. Paradoxical chest wall motion arises from the effect of negative pleural forces acting upon the detached segment. The rib cage normally expands upward and outward during inspiration as the diaphragm contracts and flattens, creating the negative intrathoracic pressure necessary to expand the lungs. With flail chest, the detached segment of the chest wall is pulled into the chest cavity during inspiration and pushed outward during expiration (figure 2). This abnormal motion increases the work of breathing, compromises respiratory function, and may necessitate intubation and ventilatory support. (See "Chest wall diseases and restrictive physiology", section on 'Normal structure and function'.)
A flail chest can be missed early in the clinical course because muscle splinting can conceal motion of the involved segment of ribs. It may also be difficult to diagnose in patients who require immediate mechanical ventilation because ventilatory support may minimize paradoxical chest wall motion. Moreover, the pattern of flail can be affected by differential recruitment of chest wall muscles. (See 'Rib fracture morbidity' below and 'Supportive care' below.)
Chest imaging — Standard plain chest radiography is typically performed during the initial evaluation of chest trauma, but it usually underestimates the number of rib fractures and may not detect nondisplaced fractures. It will also usually identify significant pneumothorax or hemothorax and, to some extent, pulmonary contusion.
Standard two-dimensional Computed tomography (CT) of the chest is highly accurate for showing the location and number of rib fractures. It is indicated to assess chest wall pain to evaluate for rib fractures, and it is a routine part of injury evaluation when there is a concern for lung parenchymal injury, associated injury based upon the mechanism of injury (eg, aortic injury), need to assess the severity of injury for treatment, disposition planning (eg, admission to hospital), or when surgical fracture fixation is being considered. (See "Initial evaluation and management of blunt thoracic trauma in adults", section on 'Chest computed tomography for most patients' and 'Intrathoracic injury' below and 'Surgical management' below.)
Three-dimensional CT scanning can provide additional insight into the characteristics of severely displaced fractures and, therefore, may be useful for operative planning, where available (image 1) [11]. (See "Surgical management of severe rib fractures", section on 'Number of fractures to repair'.)
Ultrasound has also been used to establish the number of rib fractures, but it remains operator-dependent and will only become useful if it impacts management [12].
Rib fractures of the lower rib cage (T8 to T12) can be associated with intra-abdominal injury, and abdominal CT may also be indicated [13]. (See 'Intra-abdominal injury' below.)
Costal chondral disruption is becoming better appreciated, even though the diagnosis is difficult using CT scanning and there are no universal protocols for image acquisition. A three-year retrospective review of 574 patients with blunt injury reported 221 costal fractures in 114 patients [14]. Another study of 93 patients found an incidence of 42 percent with the majority of costal injuries involving ribs 6 to 8 [15]. The presence of cartilage calcification was associated with the presence of a costal chondral fracture.
Injury classification and severity — There are no universally agreed-upon definitions regarding the nomenclature of fractures. The Chest Wall Injury Society Consensus statement provides recommendations for definitions in relation to fracture classification, injury localization, and flail injury on two-dimensional CT scans [16]. Consensus was reached for the following:
●Individual fracture displacement categories – undisplaced, offset, displaced (figure 3)
●Individual fracture characterization – simple, wedge, complex (figure 4)
●Associated fractures on neighboring ribs defined as a "series" of fractures
●Sectors for fracture chest wall localization – costal cartilage, anterior, lateral, posterior
●Flail segment defined as radiologic findings of ≥3 consecutive ribs fractured in ≥2 places
●Flail chest defined as paradoxical motion seen on clinical examination
●Anterior flail chest defined as a minimum of three rib or costal cartilage fractures on both sides
For grading chest injury, the chest abbreviated injury scale (AIS) is often used by trauma registries, trauma researchers, and quality initiatives. The chest AIS categories (1 to 5) are as provided in the table (table 1). The chest AIS is only one component that contributes to the Injury Severity Score (ISS) calculation in multiply injured patients [17]. With chest injury, the severity of the injury not only to the chest wall but also injury to the underlying organs (lung, heart, vessels) is important to treatment outcomes [18,19]. (See 'Associated injuries' below.)
Another system that provides increasing grades for more severe chest wall injury is described by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (table 2), but is less used.
Associated injuries — The most common mechanisms leading to multiple rib fractures are front- or side-impact motor vehicle collisions that cause contact between the patient and the steering wheel or door. As a result, head injury, abdominal injury, and extremity injury are commonly associated with chest wall injury [7]. Ninety percent of patients with rib fractures will have associated injuries [1]. The presence of intrathoracic or intra-abdominal injuries relates directly to the site of impact, with injured organs located directly beneath the fractured ribs. The risk of organ injury increases if two or more rib fractures are present at the same level. Fractures to the first two ribs generally require a severe mechanism of injury due to their relative protection by surrounding muscles and short length. These are associated with increased morbidity and mortality from associated injuries.
Intrathoracic injury — Pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pulmonary contusion are common in patients with multiple rib fractures. Hemothorax and pneumothorax are usually apparent upon initial presentation; however, delayed hemothorax or pneumothorax can occur.
●Pneumothorax – Displaced rib fractures can push into the lung, tearing the pulmonary pleura and lung tissue and causing pneumothorax, which occurs in approximately 25 percent of patients with multiple rib fractures [2]. Pneumothorax is suspected on chest auscultation as diminished breath sounds on the affected side but may also manifest as subcutaneous emphysema with crepitus upon palpation of the chest wall. On chest radiograph, pneumothorax is diagnosed as a radiolucent space where the pulmonary parenchyma has separated from the parietal pleura. On supine radiograph, a deep sulcus sign may be more evident than apical separation. The plain film diagnosis of pneumothorax is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Clinical presentation and diagnosis of pneumothorax", section on 'Diagnostic imaging'.)
●Hemothorax – Disruption of the intercostal vessels can lead to bleeding into the chest, particularly when multiple ribs are involved. However, massive hemothorax from intercostal vessel injury alone is rare. When present, significant hemothorax is more likely to be from direct lung parenchymal injury. In the supine position, hemothorax is identified on chest radiograph as a diffuse increase in opacification on the affected side due to the layering of blood posteriorly. The presence of hemothorax in the trauma patient indicates the need for a thoracostomy tube. (See "Initial evaluation and management of blunt thoracic trauma in adults".)
A large volume of initial chest tube drainage or ongoing bleeding may indicate the need for thoracic exploration. In the presence of upper rib fractures, hemothorax should be assumed to be from a major vascular injury until proven otherwise and not solely attributed to the rib fractures. Laceration of the aorta can occur directly related to the rib fracture [20-24]. Patients with persistent hemorrhage but without injury to the major vasculature may require urgent thoracotomy to ligate the intercostal vessels.
●Pulmonary contusion – Pulmonary contusion is due to the transmission of blunt force through the chest wall to the underlying lung parenchyma. Hemorrhage and alveolar collapse result, which have the appearance of focal consolidation on chest radiography. The extent of pulmonary contusion is best evaluated on chest CT. The appearance of the injury progresses over time, and follow-up imaging is needed. (See 'Supportive care' below and "Pulmonary contusion in adults".)
Sternal fracture — Sternal fracture may accompany rib fractures when there is an anterior blow to the chest, such as an impact on the steering wheel in a motor vehicle collision. A palpable sternal step-off may be appreciated [25]. In one study, sternal fracture occurred in 7 percent of patients with flail chest [26]. The presence of a sternal fracture should raise concern for blunt cardiac injury, and appropriate workup should be initiated. (See "Initial evaluation and management of blunt cardiac injury".)
Sternal fracture will usually heal without specific intervention but require precautions (limited lifting) once the patient is up and around. Severely displaced sternal fracture may require operative intervention.
Rarely, patients may have an unstable sternum or complete disruption of bilateral costochondral junction, leading to a "flail sternum" with paradoxical movement as would be seen in a flail chest (movie 1). In these instances, operative fixation of the sternum or costochondral junction may be beneficial (image 2 and picture 2), although there are no large case series upon which to base this recommendation.
Intra-abdominal injury — The spleen and liver are the most commonly injured intra-abdominal organs following blunt trauma, occurring in 2 to 4 percent of patients [26]. Fractures of the right lower ribs lead to hepatic injury, fractures of the left lower ribs to splenic injury, and fractures of the posterior portion of the lower ribs can cause kidney injury. (See "Blunt abdominal trauma in adults: Initial evaluation and management" and "Management of splenic injury in the adult trauma patient" and "Management of hepatic trauma in adults" and "Blunt genitourinary trauma: Initial evaluation and management".)
Head injury — Head injury is a sign of a severe mechanism of injury. In one study, head injury was present in 25 percent of patients diagnosed with flail chest [26]. Of the three groups studied (flail with head injury, isolated flail, flail plus thoracic/abdominal injury), patients with flail chest and head injury had significantly higher mortality compared with patients without head injury (16 versus 4 and 7 percent). (See "Management of acute moderate and severe traumatic brain injury".)
Upper extremity injury — The mechanism of injury that includes a combination of multiple rib fractures and upper extremity injury is typically a side-impact automobile collision. Lateral chest wall fractures, pulmonary contusion, and upper extremity injuries, including clavicular fracture, scapular fracture, shoulder injury (eg, shoulder dislocation), and long bone fractures, can occur. In one study, flail chest was associated with clavicular fracture in 8 percent of patients, and other upper extremity injuries were present in 4 percent of patients [26]. (See "Initial evaluation and management of blunt thoracic trauma in adults" and "Clavicle fractures" and "Proximal humeral fractures in adults" and "Midshaft humerus fractures in adults" and "Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joint complex injuries".)
RIB FRACTURE MORBIDITY —
Rib fractures are associated with morbidity, including pneumonia (most common), retained hemothorax or empyema, respiratory failure requiring intubation, and fracture nonunion, which can lead to chronic pain and disability. In a review of the National Trauma Data Bank, 59 percent of patients admitted with a flail chest required mechanical ventilation, with a mean duration of 12.1 days, and 54 percent had an associated pulmonary contusion [7]. In-hospital complications included pneumonia in 21 percent, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in 14 percent, and sepsis in 7 percent. Death occurred in 16 percent. While there is a better appreciation of the prevalence of costal chondral fractures, studies specifically addressing the clinical significance of these injuries are not available.
Pneumonia — Pneumonia is one of the most common complications associated with rib fractures. The probability of pneumonia (and death) is directly related to the number of fractured ribs as well as the age of the patient [7,27-30]. The incidence of pneumonia for all patients hospitalized with one or more rib fractures is approximately 6 percent [27]. For patients admitted to a trauma center (presumably with more severe injuries), the incidence is greater [7]. Two retrospective studies reported pneumonia in 11 and 17 percent of patients <65 years old but 31 and 34 percent in older patients [28,31].
Because pneumonia is the common pathway to death from rib fractures, it is imperative that pain is adequately controlled and aggressive pulmonary support is provided to reduce the risk of pneumonia, avoid the need for intubation, and facilitate extubation as quickly as possible. (See 'Pain control' below and 'Supportive care' below.)
In patients with flail chest, the inherent chest wall instability and higher degree of pain associated with deep breathing and coughing lead to a high incidence of acute respiratory failure and the need for mechanical ventilation. Pneumonia following intubation for flail chest or multiply fractured ribs is common. The probability of pneumonia is approximately 3 percent for each day the patient is intubated. (See 'Flail chest' above.)
Respiratory failure — Pain and loss of chest wall function reduce the ability to move the chest wall upward with inspiration and downward with expiration. The altered pulmonary mechanics increase the work of breathing. As a result, the patient is at risk for respiratory muscle fatigue. Respiratory function is worsened by poor pulmonary hygiene from an inability to cough, which can lead to pneumonia. While respiratory failure can be due to the chest wall injury (eg, flail chest), it is more commonly related to an underlying pulmonary contusion or development of nosocomial pneumonia, particularly if superimposed upon a preexisting pulmonary condition. Atelectasis or underlying pulmonary contusion contributes to impaired oxygen exchange, as evidenced by an increased alveolar-arterial (A-a) gradient.
Retained hemothorax — Retained hemothorax refers to the presence of blood/clot in the thoracic cavity that persists despite thoracostomy drainage. The risk of empyema is increased in patients with retained hemothorax [32]. (See 'Empyema' below.)
The most accurate means to diagnose a retained hemothorax is with chest CT. Many authors have advocated early video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to provide adequate drainage of the chest in these circumstances. In one trial, patients treated with early evacuation by VATS had a significantly shortened duration of chest tube drainage, fewer hospital days, and lower total hospital costs compared with patients randomized to receive a second thoracostomy tube [33]. In another study, implementation of a clinical pathway (patients with residual hemothorax on postoperative day 2 were drained with VATS) resulted in shorter hospital stays and decreased costs [34]. (See "Overview of minimally invasive thoracic surgery", section on 'Chest drainage/pleurectomy'.)
Empyema — Empyema is an infected pleural fluid collection and is estimated to occur in 3 to 10 percent of patients after the placement of a thoracostomy tube for chest trauma [32,35]. Independent predictors of post-traumatic empyema include prolonged duration of the thoracostomy tube and length of stay in an intensive care unit, the need for laparotomy, and the presence of pulmonary contusion or retained hemothorax [35]. In one study, empyema occurred in 33 percent of patients who had retained hemothorax compared with 2 percent of patients without [32]. (See "Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic evaluation of parapneumonic effusion and empyema in adults".)
Some studies have suggested that prophylactic antibiotics in trauma patients at the time of thoracostomy tube placement reduced the risk of empyema [36]. This issue is discussed separately. (See "Thoracostomy tubes and catheters: Placement techniques and complications", section on 'Antibiotic prophylaxis'.)
Fracture nonunion — A small percentage of rib fractures do not heal even though a fibrous capsule may envelop the fracture ("pseudoarthrosis") (image 3). Although some consider a nonunion to be present three months following injury, most agree that the presence of a pseudoarthrosis six months following injury is pathognomonic of a nonunion. A nonunion usually presents as discomfort with respiration due to movement of the fracture site. Some patients find the respiratory restriction due to pain quite disabling.
A small number of case series describe operative fixation to manage pain and disability in patients with nonunion of traumatic rib fractures [37-39]. The fibrous callous enveloping the nonunion is resected, and a plate is used to fixate the ribs, limit their motion, and facilitate healing. Patients treated operatively appear to have had good relief of their symptoms. (See 'Surgical management' below and "Surgical management of severe rib fractures".)
Chronic pain and long-term disability — Patients with multiple rib fractures or those with nonunion, and even some who have undergone rib fracture stabilization, are at risk for chronic pain that can lead to long-term disability [40-43]. In an observational study that followed 187 patients with rib fractures for more than two months, 59 percent had prolonged chest wall pain, and 76 percent had prolonged disability. Even the subset of patients with isolated rib fractures had high rates of pain (64 percent) and disability (66 percent) at two months [41]. Data for later outcomes are lacking.
MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND INITIAL CARE —
For most patients with traumatic rib fractures, we suggest initial conservative management rather than surgical intervention (algorithm 1) [44]. Management includes adequate pain control to prevent pain-associated splinting that leads to inadequate ventilation, weak cough, atelectasis, pneumonia, and possibly prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit (ICU) stays [45]. Surgical rib stabilization remains an option for patients who continue to have acute pain or other problems that interfere with respiratory toilet, those experiencing worsening pulmonary function, or those with rib fractures that do not heal (ie, nonunion) and are causing persistent pain and functional impairment. (See "Surgical management of severe rib fractures".)
The presence of several rib fractures suggests the need for hospitalization or transfer to a regional trauma facility. Hospital admission should be considered for any patient older than 65 years with multiple rib fractures, especially if they have other comorbidities.
The location of hospital care depends on the severity of rib fractures and other injuries. An increased number of rib fractures is clearly associated with higher morbidity and mortality [1,2,27-29,46-48]. Following the implementation of one algorithm for determining the need for hospital admission, hospital location, interventions to consider, and recommended follow-up care, the study authors reported a 60 percent reduction in unanticipated ICU admission [49].
Patients who are otherwise healthy with well-controlled pain, no respiratory distress, and good pulmonary function with no pulmonary comorbidities are potential candidates for outpatient management. The outpatient management of rib fractures is discussed elsewhere. (See "Initial evaluation and management of rib fractures".)
Scoring to predict morbidity — There are no prospectively validated scoring systems or algorithms for determining admission status or location (eg, discharge versus admission to the ICU versus admission to the ward) for patients with rib fractures. However, several scoring systems that can be used to predict impending respiratory failure due to rib fractures have been described [46,47]. Elements that are common to most scoring systems and are associated with respiratory failure include age >65 years old, number of broken ribs, and bilateral rib fractures. The elements of two such scoring systems are shown below.
●Chest trauma score – Each variable is scored as shown, and the total score is summed. A score >4 is associated with respiratory failure and increased mortality [46].
•Age younger than 45 years old (1 point)
•Age 46 to 65 years old (2 points)
•Age older than 65 years old (3 points)
•No pulmonary contusion (0 points)
•Single lung, minor contusion (1 point)
•Bilateral lung, minor contusion (2 points)
•Single lung, severe contusion (3 points)
•Bilateral lung, severe contusion (4 points)
•Less than three rib fractures (1 point)
•Three to five rib fractures (2 points)
•More than five rib fractures (3 points)
•Bilateral rib fractures (2 points)
●Ribscore – Ribscore is a score based on fracture pattern that predicts pneumonia, respiratory failure, and tracheostomy [47]. Each variable is assigned a score of one point, and the total score is summed. A score >3 is associated with respiratory failure.
•Six or more fractured ribs
•Bilateral fractured ribs
•Flail chest
•Three or more bicortical (displaced) fractures
•First rib fracture present
•Multisegment fracture
Initial inpatient care — Conservative management of rib fractures initially involves thoracostomy drainage for pneumothorax/hemothorax (when present), limiting fluid during trauma resuscitation to reduce edema in the contused lung, and appropriate prophylactic therapies.
●Thoracostomy drainage – Patients with hemothorax or pneumothorax following chest trauma generally require thoracostomy tube placement. The techniques for placement and management of thoracostomy tubes are discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Initial evaluation and management of blunt thoracic trauma in adults", section on 'Pneumothorax' and "Initial evaluation and management of blunt thoracic trauma in adults", section on 'Hemothorax' and "Thoracostomy tubes and catheters: Indications and tube selection in adults and children".)
●Fluid management – It is important to keep patients euvolemic and avoid hypervolemia due to the risk of pulmonary edema in contused pulmonary tissue [50]. Pulmonary contusion may or may not be as evident on the initial chest radiograph, and a high index of suspicion for its presence based on the mechanism of injury allows for prudent fluid administration. (See "Overview of inpatient management of the adult trauma patient", section on 'Pulmonary contusion'.)
●Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis – Trauma patients are at high risk for developing DVT, and prophylaxis is indicated. The timing of pharmacologic therapy (eg, enoxaparin) early after injury should be coordinated so as not to prevent regional analgesia when indicated. (See "Prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in adult nonorthopedic surgical patients".)
●Antibiotics – Patients with penetrating chest trauma may benefit from prophylactic antibiotics to limit infectious complications associated with chest tube placement. These issues are discussed elsewhere. (See "Thoracostomy tubes and catheters: Placement techniques and complications", section on 'Antibiotic prophylaxis'.)
Multidisciplinary management is associated with improved outcomes [51,52]. Multidisciplinary care of the patient with multiple rib fractures includes an acute pain service for pain management, respiratory therapy to improve volume expansion and assist with ventilator management, physical therapy to increase patient mobility, and nutritional support to optimize wound healing. In a prospective study of patients with ≥4 rib fractures, a multidisciplinary clinical care pathway was associated with shorter ICU and hospital stays and lower mortality compared with those who were not in the care pathway [51]. (See 'Pain control' below and 'Supportive care' below.)
PAIN CONTROL —
Patients with rib fractures seek to minimize their chest wall motion by reducing their tidal volume and coughing effort. Pain control is fundamental to decrease chest wall splinting and alveolar collapse. Adequate pain management improves patient tolerance for deep breathing and coughing, which improves lung volume and clears secretions, thereby reducing the risk of pneumonia. Pain control can generally be achieved with a multimodal regimen. (See 'Supportive care' below and 'Pneumonia' above.)
Our strategy — Aside from providing pain relief, the strategy for pain control should minimize the need for narcotics, given their respiratory side effects. Our approach is generally consistent with guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) [45,53,54]. The involvement of a dedicated pain service is critical to providing tailored therapy and monitoring its effectiveness (mainly when intravenous lidocaine infusion or regional analgesia modalities are used).
We use an escalating strategy of analgesia that begins with placing the patient on around-the-clock acetaminophen [55], a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (eg, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor), and a low-dose demand-only opioid (eg, hydromorphone, morphine, fentanyl). We prefer to use hydromorphone delivered using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Alternative opioid agents can be used; however, morphine should not be used in patients with severely impaired kidney function due to the potential buildup of its metabolites and resultant adverse effects. Due to its wide volume of distribution, fentanyl can also accumulate. For those with pain that is refractory to pharmacologic agents, additional pain control involves the placement of an epidural or paravertebral catheter for continuous infusion of ropivacaine. In centers where the placement of epidural or paravertebral catheters is not readily available, intercostal blocks are effective for providing non-narcotic-based analgesia. If pain is still not sufficiently controlled using regional anesthesia, the patient is placed on a ketamine or lidocaine infusion [56,57]. The use of lidocaine for the control of rib fracture pain is not well studied, but this agent has been shown to be effective for controlling pain related to other injuries, as well as for short-term postoperative pain relief [58-60]. If the patient is receiving ropivacaine, lidocaine cannot be given systemically. Both physicians and nurses must be trained on how to treat lidocaine-related complications should these occur. (See 'Oral and parenteral therapy' below and 'Regional anesthesia' below and "Surgical management of severe rib fractures" and "Local anesthetic systemic toxicity".)
If pain continues to preclude adequate mobility and the ability to cough or the patient has impending respiratory failure due to pain, we proceed with surgical rib fracture fixation, often with intraoperative cryoablation of the associated intercostal nerves as well [61]. (See 'Surgical management' below.)
Oral and parenteral therapy — Provision of pain relief should begin with the use of systemic analgesics that have minimal side effects. These include acetaminophen dosed around the clock to achieve a total daily dose of 3 grams, as well as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which can also be initially dosed around the clock [55]. COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib, may be safer than nonselective COX inhibitors, such as ibuprofen, in patients with a history of gastritis or kidney function impairment.
Intravenous narcotics (eg, morphine) are preferred over subcutaneous or intramuscular injection due to a rapid and predictable onset of action. PCA using a demand-only mode is advocated for patients with rib fractures because of more timely access to pain medication by the patients and a reduced risk for excessive sedation. Patients should be switched from PCA narcotics to orally administered narcotics as soon as possible to facilitate timely discharge from the hospital. (See "Approach to the management of acute pain in adults" and "Use of opioids for acute pain in hospitalized patients".)
Ketamine can also be used to provide ongoing relief of pain, if needed, in addition to acetaminophen, COX-2 receptor inhibitors, and regional analgesia [62-64]. This agent can be administered as a continuous infusion at a low (subanesthetic) dose as an opioid-sparing adjuvant. In this setting, the risk of adverse side effects is very low.
If these agents do not provide sufficient analgesia, consideration should be given to the use of regional anesthesia. (See 'Regional anesthesia' below.)
Regional anesthesia — Regional anesthesia techniques available for the management of multiple rib fractures include continuous epidural infusion, paravertebral block, and newer techniques such as erector spinae block (ESP), serratus anterior plane (SAP) block for anterolateral rib fractures. Each modality has its benefits and risks and there is insufficient evidence to advocate for one technique over the others [65-70]. Furthermore, some regional techniques are not efficacious in patients with bilateral rib fractures or have limited use due to lack of clinician familiarity with the block or inability to place a catheter for continuous infusion of local anesthetic. (See "Overview of anesthesia", section on 'Neuraxial (spinal or epidural) anesthesia' and "Thoracic nerve block techniques".)
Randomized trials comparing the efficacy of these modalities in patients with rib fractures are not available. Nevertheless, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or a thoracic paravertebral block is often selected for patients with multiple bilateral fractures if there are no contraindications to neuraxial techniques. The EAST trauma guidelines recommend epidural analgesia for patients with four or more rib fractures and suggest its use in those with fewer fractures who are older than 65 years, have significant cardiopulmonary disease, or have diabetes mellitus [45,65]. However, regional anesthesia is underutilized. In a review of the National Trauma Data Bank, only about 3 percent of patients who might benefit from regional analgesia for treatment of rib fracture-related pain actually received this treatment [71].
Proponents of epidural-based analgesia cite that this modality has been studied much more extensively and is of proven benefit following rib fractures [72]. Advocates of paravertebral analgesia cite the following advantages: no need to access the spinal space, thereby lowering the risk of epidural hematoma or infection; less likelihood of sympatholysis with resultant hypotension; and ability to discharge the patient with the catheter in place. In a review of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) in the United States that included a total of 194,766 patients were admitted for rib fractures, 1073 patients had epidural analgesia, and 1110 had paravertebral block. The remainder had neither [73]. After propensity score matching, there were no differences for in-hospital mortality, length of stay, intensive care admission or length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, mechanical ventilation or duration, development of pneumonia, or other complications. Thus, either technique appears to be a reasonable analgesic option for rib pain refractory to oral and parenteral therapy.
There is increasing interest in alternative regional analgesia techniques, such as ESP and SAP blocks. At some institutions, the ESP block is the first-line therapy for patients with rib fractures. Proponents argue that these blocks are safer and may be able to cover a wider area compared with paravertebral or epidural blocks. In addition, the placement of these blocks does not require holding or dose adjusting pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
Ultrasound imaging can be helpful during the placement of these blocks [74]. Further details regarding the selection and performance of these regional anesthetic techniques are discussed below and in other topics. (See "Anesthesia for thoracic trauma in adults", section on 'Regional analgesic techniques' and "Thoracic nerve block techniques".)
Continuous epidural infusion — A 2019 meta-analysis that included 19 studies (eight randomized trials, ten retrospective cohort studies, and one prospective cohort study) with a total of 2801 patients suggested that epidural analgesia may provide better pain relief compared with other modalities [75]. In patients with multiple rib fractures, epidural analgesia is associated with improved pain control, reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, and a decreased incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in some, but not all, trials. However, some patients who would benefit from epidural placement will not be able to receive one (eg, spine fracture) [76]. The most widely studied approach uses epidural catheters to infuse local anesthetics with or without the addition of narcotic agents. Side effects of epidural combinations of local anesthetic and opioids include pruritus, nausea, urinary retention, and respiratory depression. (See "Continuous epidural analgesia for postoperative pain: Technique and management".)
A systematic review and meta-analysis that included eight trials [76-81] comparing thoracic epidural with other forms of analgesia did not find any differences in the need for mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, or mortality in patients managed with epidural analgesia [82]. However, the duration of mechanical ventilation was less for those managed with TEA. Higher rates of hypotension were found with TEA compared with no epidural analgesia or epidural analgesia at the lumbar level. Three of the eight included studies found superior pain control associated with epidural use; however, a pooled analysis of all the data were not performed [83]. Other trials not included in this meta-analysis also found better pain scores for epidural analgesia compared with intravenous narcotics and improved pulmonary function [84-86].
In a registry review of highly selected patients with three or more rib fractures from blunt trauma, mortality up to one year after injury was lower among those who received an epidural catheter compared with those without [87]. Excluded were patients who were not potential candidates for epidural placement, such as patients with significant head and spine injuries, significant neurologic impairment, unstable pelvic fractures, coagulopathy, or those who died within 48 hours. The authors noted that while mortality was reduced, epidural analgesia did not reduce pulmonary complications, raising concern that these results were caused by other factors that may be associated with epidural placement and not a direct benefit (causal relationship) from the regional anesthesia. In this study, most of the epidural catheters were placed at level I trauma centers, which are known to be associated with improved outcomes. However, similarly, improved outcomes were also demonstrated in a review of a level II trauma center registry [88].
The use of epidural catheters in patients with multisystem trauma is often limited because of contraindications to epidural catheter placement (eg, spine fractures, coagulopathy) [89]. All patients, but particularly older patients, managed with epidural analgesic infusion should be closely monitored for side effects. (See "Overview of neuraxial anesthesia", section on 'Adverse effects and complications'.)
Paravertebral catheter infusion — Paravertebral catheter infusion provides regional analgesia to one side of the chest using a local anesthetic, such as ropivacaine. Analgesia administered through a paravertebral catheter is associated with a lower rate of systemic hypotension when compared with epidural infusion, and there may be less urinary retention with a paravertebral catheter in place.
Paravertebral block improves pain, bedside spirometry, and blood gas parameters. Small trials and a prospective nonrandomized study have reported this technique to be effective for controlling pain associated with rib fractures [83,90,91]. However, a review of the National Trauma Database (NTDB) found no differences between 1073 patients with epidural catheters and 1110 with paravertebral catheters relative to propensity-matched controls [73].
Paravertebral blocks can be administered as a single shot or as a continuous infusion. A commercially available infusion system (ie, ON-Q) can provide ongoing continuous delivery of a local anesthetic for up to one week. This infusion system allows patients to be discharged to home with the paravertebral block in place. (See "Thoracic paravertebral block procedure guide".)
For clinicians familiar with paravertebral catheter placement, this technique may also be easier to perform compared with epidural catheter placement. However, the failure rate is as high as 10 percent, and vascular puncture occurs in about 4 percent [92]. Other complications include dural puncture and subarachnoid injection [91-94]. An ultrasound-guided technique for placement has been described that may make this technique safer and easier [95-97].
Intercostal nerve blocks — Intercostal nerves can be blocked individually to provide a band-like segment of anesthesia at the chosen level. This block is easy to perform, though multiple blocks are often required. Intercostal nerve blocks have few hemodynamic consequences, though they are associated with pneumothorax, with an increasing risk for a higher number of nerve blocks performed [98]. (See "Thoracic nerve block techniques", section on 'Intercostal nerve block'.)
Intermittent intercostal nerve block controls pain associated with rib fractures but is limited by the duration of the block and, for patients with multiple rib fractures, the need to perform the procedure at multiple intercostal levels. Repeated blockade is needed for prolonged relief, although the use of a long-acting anesthetic agent can minimize the need for repeat dosing [98-101]. A continuous infusion device, which can be performed at the bedside, is also available [102].
Intercostal nerve blocks involve injections of the intercostal nerve proximal to the point of injury and at a level above and below the injured rib. Some advocate performing the block proximal to the midaxillary line to ensure blockade of the lateral and anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerve, but this should only be necessary when analgesia of the skin is required [103,104].
●A small trial compared 18 patients who received single-dose intercostal injection of liposomal bupivacaine with 16 patients who received continuous infusion of bupivacaine after undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures [105]. Liposomal bupivacaine was administered into the intercostal space under thoracoscopic guidance while the continuous infusion catheter was tunneled across the operative field at the time of rib fixation. The primary outcome was a difference in the Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function score over the first five days postoperatively, which was reported as noninferior for the single-dose injection group compared with the continuous infusion group. However, this study is limited by its sample size and limited follow-up.
●Another study compared continuous bupivacaine intercostal block in 85 patients with thoracic epidural for rib fractures in 44 patients [106]. Pain scores were similar between the two groups, but the intercostal block group had a shorter duration of ICU and hospital stay and improved incentive spirometer volume.
●A larger, retrospective, propensity-matched study involving 116 patients reported that patients who received an intercostal block with liposomal bupivacaine were significantly less likely to require intubation and had a shorter duration of ICU and hospital stay compared with those who received a thoracic epidural [107].
Erector spinae block — ESP block is a fascial block whereby an anesthetic agent is placed into the plane between the erector spinae muscles and the transverse process of the vertebrae (image 4). It provides pain relief by blocking the dorsal and ventral rami of the spinal nerves. The proposed advantage of this block is it allows distribution of the anesthetic agent over a wide area, thereby providing analgesia across a large dermatomal distribution. Additionally, administration of this block does not require holding or dose adjustment of pharmacologic prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism. A randomized trial of 50 patients compared ESP with SAP and found that, although both were effective in lowering 24-hour opioid need and subjective pain score, the ESP block improved these numerical metrics to a greater degree than SAP [108]. Another trial compared ESP with paravertebral blocks in 60 patients with rib fractures [109]. This study found equally effective pain relief in each cohort, although the study used single-dose rather than continuous infusion of the anesthetic agent. Lastly, a retrospective study compared ESP with a nonregional multimodality pain regimen in 142 patients with rib fractures [110]. This study found no difference in opioid need between the groups. (See "Thoracic nerve block techniques" and "Erector spinae plane block procedure guide".)
Serratus anterior plane block — An SAP block involves injecting an anesthetic agent between the serratus anterior muscle and the ribs. This blocks sensory nerve transmission from the ribs to the skin. As with ESP blocks, administration of this block does not require holding or dose adjustment of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. However, theoretically, this block may not be as effective as ESP because the anesthetic agent is not injected near the nerve root as is the case with an ESP block. A multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of 588 patients compared outcomes following the addition of SAP with medical therapy alone [111]. The addition of SAP was associated with a 73 percent relative reduction in pain score and a 50 percent reduction in opioid needs. A retrospective study comparing outcomes of patients who had an SAP versus an epidural block for rib fractures found a similar reduction in pain and opioid need between the two groups [112]. Since the SAP is easier to place and associated with less risk, the authors concluded that SAP should be the preferred pain control modality for patients with rib fractures, although they conceded that this needs to be validated prospectively. (See "Thoracic nerve block techniques", section on 'Serratus plane block'.)
Cryoneurolysis — Cryoneurolysis with direct application of a cryoprobe to intercostal nerves is a technique that can be performed either percutaneously at the bedside using ultrasound guidance [113] or in the operating room during intervention such as rib fracture fixation [114,115]. Cryoneurolysis causes the destruction of the nerve axon and myelin sheath followed by Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve resulting in numbness distal to the area of treatment. Evidence from small studies suggests that cryoneurolysis decreases opioid requirements and improves respiratory function (eg, incentive spirometry) [61,116,117].
The procedure involves freezing the axon of an intercostal nerve to minus 60 degrees Celsius for one to two minutes. When effective, the area around the fracture site will be numb for two to four weeks. This procedure should not be done below rib 7 due to the risk of denervating the abdominal wall, which could result in a pseudohernia. Cryoablation should also be avoided near the vertebral column due to the risk of injury to the nerve roots. In general, this procedure is best done for fractures in the anterolateral to posterolateral region.
Limitations of intercostal nerve cryoneurolysis include:
●Patients with posterior rib fractures may not benefit since the posterior branch of the intercostal nerve is proximal to the site of cryoprobe application.
●The effect is temporary since nerve regeneration can occur because the endoneural, perineural, and epineural structures remain intact.
●Dysesthesias occur with a higher incidence after thoracic trauma compared with elective thoracic surgical procedures.
SUPPORTIVE CARE —
Supportive pulmonary measures are aimed at avoiding the need for intubation.
Pulmonary support — Patients with multiple rib fractures should receive lung volume expansion treatments regularly. Lung volume expansion by noninvasive means using incentive spirometry, deep breathing, and coughing is important to reduce secretions and prevent atelectasis [118]. One study reported that every 10 percent increase in vital capacity after injury was associated with a 36 percent reduction in the likelihood of pulmonary complications [119]. However, aggressive pulmonary toilet and chest physiotherapy may be limited by chest wall pain, and adequate pain control is important for success. (See 'Pain control' above.)
Avoidance of intubation altogether and timely extubation for those who require intubation are associated with decreased mortality [120]. Patients who have not already been intubated need to be monitored closely for respiratory fatigue [26]. A trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is warranted in appropriately selected patients to avoid obligatory mechanical ventilation [121]. Intubation may be unavoidable despite appropriate pain control and pulmonary care and when needed, should be done preemptively under controlled conditions to prevent morbidity associated with sudden respiratory decompensation. (See "The decision to intubate".)
Intubation and ventilatory support are more often needed in patients with flail chest [9]. A review of patients with flail chest from the National Trauma Data Bank reported that 59 percent of patients required mechanical ventilation [87]. It is imperative to determine if the cause for respiratory failure is pain or inherent chest wall instability, in which case a more aggressive pain control strategy or surgical stabilization of the chest wall may be of benefit, or whether respiratory failure is related to lung pathology, such as pulmonary contusion. In the latter case, there is much less of a role for surgical stabilization of the chest wall until the underlying lung parenchyma has healed to a point where extubation is feasible. Patients who fail to wean from mechanical ventilation may ultimately benefit from operative rib fracture fixation. (See 'Surgical management' below.)
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT —
Although the majority of patients will heal their rib fractures with conservative measures, it is recognized that selected patients may benefit from surgical rib fracture fixation, and for these patients, surgical fixation may be more cost-effective [44,122-125]. (See "Surgical management of severe rib fractures".)
MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY —
Rib fractures are clearly associated with increased morbidity (typically pneumonia) and mortality [1,27-29,41,48,126]. (See 'Rib fracture morbidity' above.)
The presence of six or more rib fractures significantly increases the risk of death, often due to associated injuries [1,29]. Flail chest in isolation is associated with a mortality rate of 16 percent [127]. A review of data from the National Trauma Data Bank confirmed an increasing risk of pulmonary complications with an increasing number of rib fractures but identified age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) as the primary predictors of death [7,27,48]. For each fractured rib, the odds ratio of death increased by 19 percent, and the risk of pneumonia increased by 27 percent in one study [28]. Conversely, the odds ratio of death decreases by 40 percent with adequate pain control. Thus, pain control, adequate pulmonary hygiene, and early mobility are the goals of care for patients with severe rib fractures. (See 'Management approach and initial care' above and 'Pain control' above and 'Supportive care' above.)
An increased number of rib fractures is more common in older patients who are clearly at a higher risk for complications [28,31,128-131]. In one study, patients over age 45 with ≥4 rib fractures had a significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation and longer hospital stay compared with younger patients [129]. An increased incidence of infectious complications in older patients likely drives these data. For patients <65 years, pneumonia occurs in 11 to 17 percent, whereas for patients ≥65 years, rates up to 34 percent are reported [28,129]. One other study found that for each additional rib fracture in patients >65 years, the risk of pneumonia increased by 27 percent, and mortality increased by 19 percent. Thus, although outcomes following rib plating have not been studied in patients grouped by age, it may be logical to offer operative intervention more frequently to older patients and those with a higher number of rib fractures than to younger, less injured patients. (See 'Pneumonia' above and "Surgical management of severe rib fractures", section on 'Indications'.)
Patients with uncomplicated rib fractures can have significant short-term disabilities [42,132,133], and in one study, these patients lost an average of 70 days of work [42]. Patients with crush injuries associated with severe chest deformities are likely to have significant long-term disability without surgical stabilization of the chest [10].
SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS —
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Thoracic trauma" and "Society guideline links: General fracture and stress fracture management in adults" and "Society guideline links: General issues of trauma management in adults".)
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS —
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
●Basics topics (see "Patient education: Rib injury in adults (The Basics)")
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●Traumatic rib fractures – Traumatic rib fractures, which are often multiple, are the consequence of significant forces impacting the chest wall and are most commonly due to blunt injuries (eg, motor vehicle crash, falls, assault), but penetrating injuries (eg, gunshot) can also fracture ribs. (See 'Introduction' above and 'Trauma evaluation' above.)
•Physical examination – Physical findings indicative of a rib fracture include rib pain with palpation, palpable rib step-offs, and crepitus. Patients may also complain of feeling a "clicking" or movement with deep breathing or Valsalva techniques. Multiple fractures may cause a visible chest wall deformity or open chest wound. (See 'History and physical' above.)
•Flail chest – Flail chest is present when three or more ribs are fractured in two or more places (figure 1). The presence of paradoxical respiratory motion, an area of the chest wall pulled in with inspiration and pushed out with expiration, is diagnostic for flail chest (figure 2). Flail chest occurs in 5 to 13 percent of patients with chest wall injury. Sternal flail occurs when the sternum becomes dissociated from the hemithoraces. Pulmonary contusion is common with flail injuries, and these patients are at high risk for acute respiratory failure. (See 'Flail chest' above.)
•Chest imaging – Standard plain chest radiographs may show the rib fractures but usually underestimate the number of fractures. The presence of pneumothorax or hemothorax on plain radiographs should prompt re-review of all imaging studies for rib fractures or sternal fracture. Although computed tomography (CT) of the chest is highly accurate for showing the location and number of rib fractures, CT should be reserved for when there is a concern for concomitant injury (eg, pulmonary contusion, empyema, aortic injury) or when intervention is being considered. Rib fractures of the lower rib cage (T8 to T12) can be associated with intra-abdominal injury (eg, spleen, liver), and abdominal CT may also be indicated. (See 'Chest imaging' above.)
●Management approach – For most patients with traumatic rib fractures, we suggest initial conservative management rather than surgical rib fracture stabilization (algorithm 1) (Grade 2C). The location of care depends on the severity of the injuries. (See 'Management approach and initial care' above.)
•Triage and disposition
-For limited, isolated rib injuries (<3 fractures), outpatient management with oral analgesics and incentive spirometry may suffice.
-For patients with ≥3 rib fractures, open chest injury, flail segment, or severe associated injuries, hospitalization or transfer to a regional trauma facility is warranted. Older patients are at increased risk for complications associated with rib fractures, and hospital admission should be considered for any older adult (>65 years) patient. Such patients may benefit from admission to a center with dedicated resources and expertise in the management of multiply fractured ribs.
•Initial inpatient care – Conservative management of rib fractures initially involves thoracostomy drainage for pneumothorax/hemothorax (when present) and judicious fluid resuscitation to reduce edema in the contused lung.
●Subsequent management – Subsequent management includes aggressive pain control, supportive pulmonary care, and early mobility for volume expansion and managing secretions. A multidisciplinary approach to patients with multiple rib fractures is associated with improved outcomes. (See 'Management approach and initial care' above.)
•Pain control – Adequate pain control is fundamental for tolerating deep breathing and coughing. The involvement of a dedicated pain service is important for providing tailored therapy and for monitoring its effectiveness. Pain control can generally be achieved with a multimodal regimen. We use an escalating strategy to control pain. (See 'Pain control' above.)
•Supportive pulmonary care – Altered pulmonary mechanics increase the work of breathing and the risk for respiratory failure. Supportive pulmonary measures are aimed at avoiding the need for intubation and include volume expansion using incentive spirometry, as well as deep breathing and coughing to reduce secretions and prevent atelectasis. Patients who are not intubated need to be monitored closely for respiratory distress. (See 'Supportive care' above.)
•Need for intubation – In spite of appropriate pulmonary support, respiratory fatigue or failure may occur. Intubation may be unavoidable and, when needed, should be performed preemptively under controlled conditions. A trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is warranted for appropriately selected patients in an attempt to avoid mechanical ventilation. Avoidance of intubation altogether and timely extubation among those for whom intubation is required to decrease mortality. (See 'Supportive care' above.)
●Surgical management – Surgical rib stabilization (picture 2) is an option for patients who continue to have acute pain or other problems that interfere with respiratory toilet, those experiencing worsening pulmonary function, or those with rib fractures that do not heal (nonunion) and are causing persistent pain and functional impairment. (See 'Surgical management' above and "Surgical management of severe rib fractures".)
●Morbidity – Rib fractures are associated with morbidity, including pneumonia (most common), retained hemothorax or empyema, respiratory failure requiring intubation, and fracture nonunion, which can lead to chronic pain and disability. The probability of pneumonia is directly related to the number of fractured ribs as well as the age of the patient; pneumonia is also a risk factor for developing empyema or respiratory failure. (See 'Rib fracture morbidity' above.)
●Mortality – Mortality from multiple rib fractures is directly related to the number of ribs fractured, injury severity (ie, associated injuries), and age. Mortality for patients over the age of 65 approaches 25 percent. A more aggressive approach to pain control, including operative fixation of rib fractures, may be warranted in older patients with severe rib fractures. (See 'Morbidity and mortality' above.)
