ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : -4 مورد

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)
Author:
Chia-Yu Chu, MD, PhD
Section Editor:
Maja Mockenhaupt, MD, PhD
Deputy Editor:
Rosamaria Corona, MD, DSc
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: Mar 20, 2025.

INTRODUCTION — 

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, acute, severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by the development of numerous nonfollicular, sterile pustules on a background of edematous erythema [1-3]. In most cases, AGEP is caused by drugs, most often antibiotics, antifungals, the calcium channel blocker diltiazem, and antimalarials [4,5]. The eruption develops within hours or days of drug exposure and resolves spontaneously in one to two weeks after drug discontinuation.

AGEP will be discussed in this topic. Pustular eruptions and other types of cutaneous drug reactions are discussed separately.

(See "Approach to the patient with pustular skin lesions".)

(See "Drug eruptions".)

(See "Exanthematous (maculopapular) drug eruption".)

(See "Lichenoid drug eruption (drug-induced lichen planus)".)

(See "Fixed drug eruption".)

(See "Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)".)

(See "Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis".)

(See "Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Management, prognosis, and long-term sequelae".)

(See "Cutaneous adverse effects of conventional chemotherapy agents".)

(See "Cutaneous adverse events of molecularly targeted therapy and other biologic agents used for cancer therapy".)

(See "Hand-foot skin reaction induced by multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors".)

(See "Toxic erythema of chemotherapy (hand-foot syndrome)".)

(See "Acneiform eruption secondary to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and MEK inhibitors".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — 

A rough estimate of the incidence of AGEP is one to five per million per year [1,6-9]. AGEP can occur at any age, although it most often affects adults [5]. In a study including 340 validated cases of AGEP, the mean age was 57.8 years, with a female predominance [5].

ETIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS

Eliciting factors — AGEP is caused by a drug in approximately 90 percent of cases [4,5,10]. Anti-infective agents (table 1A), antimalarials, and the calcium channel blocker diltiazem are the most frequently reported triggers of AGEP. In a multinational case-control study, pristinamycin, aminopenicillins, quinolones, hydroxychloroquine, antibacterial sulfonamides, and terbinafine were also strongly associated with the occurrence of AGEP [9]. However, AGEP has been associated with a wide array of medications (table 1B) [11].

There are isolated reports of AGEP associated with viral, bacterial, or parasitic infections (eg, parvovirus B19, cytomegalovirus, coxsackie B4, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2], Mycoplasma pneumoniae); spider bites; herbal medications; and iodine-based intravenous contrast media [4,5,12-24]. However, the cause remains undetermined in some cases [5].

Immunologic mechanisms — The pathomechanism of AGEP has been only partially investigated. AGEP is a T cell-mediated neutrophilic inflammation involving drug-specific CD4+ T cells, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, and inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [25]. Drug-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells produce large amounts of CXCL8 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). CXCL8, a chemokine inducing neutrophil chemotaxis, and GM-CSF, which reduces neutrophil apoptosis, are both involved in tissue accumulation of neutrophils [26-32]. T helper 17 (Th17) cells, which produce interleukin (IL) 22, may also be involved in the recruitment, activation, and migration of neutrophils in AGEP [33,34].

IL36RN gene — AGEP shares clinical, histopathologic, and transcriptomic features with pustular psoriasis [35] (see "Pustular psoriasis: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis"). Recessively germline variants in the IL36RN gene encoding the IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra) have been found in generalized pustular psoriasis [36]. These pathogenic variants lead to uncontrolled IL-36 signaling and enhanced production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8, IL-1-alpha, and IL-1-beta [36].

Variants in IL36RN have also been found in a very small subset of patients with AGEP (4 of 96 patients in one study) [37-39].

This finding suggests that generalized pustular psoriasis and AGEP may share a common pathogenetic pathway, making it difficult to distinguish between the two entities in some cases.

An in vitro study demonstrated that the causative drug specifically induced IL-36-gamma release either directly by the patient's peripheral blood monocytes or indirectly by keratinocytes in the presence of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells [39]. The drug-induced IL-36-gamma secretion was specific for AGEP and involved toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) sensing the drug/albumin complex as a danger signal.

HISTOPATHOLOGY — 

The histologic hallmark of AGEP is spongiform subcorneal and/or intraepidermal pustules (picture 1A-B). Other features include a marked edema of the papillary dermis; necrosis of single keratinocytes; and a superficial, interstitial, and mid-dermal inflammatory infiltrate of neutrophils with perivascular accentuation [40,41]. Eosinophils are often seen in the pustules or dermis.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Typical features

Skin lesions – AGEP typically manifests with the sudden development of dozens to hundreds of nonfollicular, sterile, pinhead-sized pustules on a background of edematous erythema with flexural accentuation (picture 2B and picture 2A and picture 2C) [1,2].

Latency – The eruption usually occurs hours to days after the administration of the offending drug. Antibiotics have a short lag time, although some drugs (eg, diltiazem, terbinafine, hydroxychloroquine) may show a prolonged latency time of up to several weeks [9]. In a series of 97 cases of AGEP, the median time between drug exposure and development of symptoms was one day for antibiotics and 11 days for all other drugs [9]. In a large-scale retrospective study, the median time from medication initiation to AGEP start date was three days [5].

Areas involved – The eruption generally begins on the face or intertriginous areas and rapidly extends to the trunk and limbs with a diffuse or patchy distribution. The pustular rash is occasionally accompanied by facial edema. Involvement of mucous membranes is unusual and limited to erosions of the lips when present (picture 3).

Systemic symptoms – During the acute phase, fever above 38°C (100.4°F) is often present.

Atypical presentations

Localized variant — A very rare localized clinical subtype (acute localized exanthematous pustulosis [ALEP]) has also been described [42-44]. ALEP presents with the sudden onset of multiple small pustules on a background of edematous erythema, most often located on the face (picture 4).

Severe AGEP — Atypical features such as purpura (especially on the legs), blisters, or vesicles may be seen in some patients.

Severe cases of AGEP may present with atypical target lesions and coalescent pustules, resulting in superficial erosions and a clinical picture that can be mistaken for Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) [45-51].

Rare cases of AGEP associated with hemodynamic instability and multiorgan involvement simulating septic shock or systemic inflammatory response syndrome have been reported [47,52-56].

Laboratory findings — Leukocytosis with a neutrophil count >7000/microL and mild eosinophilia are common. In a study of 340 patients with AGEP, 85 percent had absolute neutrophilia, and 52 percent developed either absolute or relative eosinophilia [5].

Organ involvement — Organ involvement is not common in AGEP but can occur, particularly in older or compromised patients. A mild increase in serum transaminases or a reversible reduction in the creatinine clearance have been reported in some patients [1,2,4,5,57].

In a retrospective study of 340 patients with AGEP, 25 of 298 patients (8.4 percent) had an acute elevation of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels, with a peak at six days [5]. Twenty-five of 319 patients (7.8 percent) experienced acute kidney insufficiency, with the median time to peak creatinine level being four days after disease onset.

Another study found that 10 of 58 patients (17 percent) with AGEP had evidence of at least one organ involvement [57]. Liver and/or kidney function tests were abnormal in seven patients, two developed acute respiratory distress, and one developed agranulocytosis.

CLINICAL COURSE AND COMPLICATIONS — 

Skin symptoms usually resolve without treatment in one to two weeks after the discontinuation of the offending drug [58]. The pustular eruption is followed by desquamation with characteristic collarettes of scale (picture 5). Courses longer than two weeks are rare [59].

Complications (eg, secondary skin infection, hypocalcemia) may occur in older or compromised patients [1,2,4,60].

DIAGNOSIS

Clinical suspicion — The diagnosis of AGEP is suspected in a patient presenting with an acute febrile pustular eruption a few hours or days after starting a drug treatment, in particular antibiotics or diltiazem (table 1A-B).

Diagnostic criteria — Clinical and laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of AGEP are as follows [61]:

Rapid development of a febrile (≥38°C [100.4°F]) pustular eruption a few hours or days after beginning a drug treatment

Clinical finding of dozens to hundreds of pinhead-sized, nonfollicular pustules on a background of edematous erythema (picture 2A-C)

Leukocytosis with marked neutrophilia (>7000/microL)

Pustular smear and culture negative for bacteria

Rapid resolution of the rash after drug discontinuation

Biopsy — Histologic examination of a skin biopsy can help confirm the diagnosis and rule out other pustular eruptions. A 4 mm punch biopsy that includes a pustule is appropriate. Histologic features that support the diagnosis of AGEP include (picture 1A-B) [62] (see 'Histopathology' above):

Intra- or subcorneal spongiform pustules

Eosinophils in the pustules or dermis

Necrotic keratinocytes

Superficial, interstitial, and mid-dermal infiltrate rich in neutrophils

Absence of tortuous, dilated blood vessels

Additional testing for the identification of the causative drug

Patch testing – Patch testing with one or multiple suspected drugs may be useful in identifying the cause of AGEP [63-66]. (See "Patch testing".)

Patch testing is generally performed at least six weeks after the resolution of the rash. A positive test can confirm a suspected drug as the cause of AGEP. However, a negative result does not exclude that a certain drug is the causative agent. Moreover, the optimal concentration of the specific drugs and vehicles for patch testing have not been determined.

Positive patch testing reactions range between 18 to 75 percent of cases depending on the specific drugs tested and the specific type of drug reaction [63,66-69]. Drugs with high patch test positivity rates include beta-lactam antibiotics, aromatic anticonvulsants, phenytoin, and corticosteroids [66]. A positive reaction is often morphologically similar to AGEP, showing small sterile pustules on an erythematous base.

Little is known about the safety of patch testing in the setting of AGEP and other severe cutaneous drug reactions. Reactivation of the original reaction has been rarely reported [66,67,70].

In vitro tests – Drug-specific in vitro immunologic tests (eg, mast cell degranulation test, macrophage migration inhibition factor test, interferon-gamma release test, lymphocyte proliferation response) are only performed in research settings [71-74].

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS — 

The differential diagnosis of AGEP includes [1,2,75]:

Generalized acute pustular psoriasis (von Zumbusch type) – Seen at a single time point and without additional information, generalized acute pustular psoriasis (picture 6) and AGEP may be difficult to differentiate both clinically and histologically. Criteria that favor a diagnosis of generalized acute pustular psoriasis include a history of psoriasis, longer duration of fever and pustular eruption, absence of drug exposure, and histologic finding of subcorneal pustules with acanthosis and papillomatosis [1]. Although generalized acute pustular psoriasis can be elicited by drugs, the spectrum of medications known to trigger psoriasis (mainly beta-blockers or lithium) overlaps with, but is distinct from, the drugs associated with AGEP [9]. (See "Pustular psoriasis: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis".)

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis – Severe cases of AGEP presenting with atypical target lesions and confluent pustules mimicking a positive Nikolsky sign may be difficult to differentiate from Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) [45-47,76]. Features that favor a diagnosis of SJS/TEN include a longer latency between drug exposure and clinical manifestations (one to four weeks), nearly universal involvement of two or more mucous membranes, more severe course, and histologic finding of full-thickness epidermal necrosis with a sparse inflammatory dermal infiltrate.

There are isolated reports of overlap cases with clinical and histologic features of both AGEP and SJS/TEN [48-50,77]. (See "Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis".)

Subcorneal pustular dermatosis (Sneddon-Wilkinson disease) – Subcorneal pustular dermatosis (Sneddon-Wilkinson disease) is a rare, chronic, relapsing pustular eruption characterized by large, flaccid pustules that involve the trunk and the intertriginous areas (picture 7A-B) [78]. Sneddon-Wilkinson disease has been reported in association with pyoderma gangrenosum, monoclonal immunoglobulin A (IgA) gammopathy, IgA myeloma, and other lymphoproliferative diseases. On histology, there is a subcorneal accumulation of neutrophils without spongiosis or keratinocyte damage and a perivascular infiltrate of neutrophils (picture 8A-B) [79-83]. (See "Neutrophilic dermatoses", section on 'Subcorneal pustular dermatosis'.)

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms – Pustules can occasionally occur in patients with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) [84]. However, DRESS is characterized by a long latency (two to eight weeks) between drug exposure and appearance of symptoms, a more severe and prolonged clinical course than AGEP, eosinophilia or atypical lymphocytosis in the peripheral blood, and signs and symptoms of visceral involvement (abnormal liver function tests in approximately 80 percent of cases). The histology of DRESS is characterized by mild spongiosis with a lymphocytic infiltrate containing eosinophils in the superficial dermis. However, subcorneal and intraepidermal neutrophilic microabscesses can be seen in pustular DRESS [84]. Cases with features of both DRESS and AGEP have been described [8,77,85,86]. (See "Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)".)

Bullous impetigo – Bullous impetigo generally occurs in young children. Small vesicles or pustules are usually localized to the head and neck or intertriginous areas (picture 9A-B). Pustules rupture and leave erosions with a honey-colored crust (picture 10). Gram staining of pustule smear reveals gram-positive cocci. Culture of pustule exudate is positive for Staphylococcus aureus. (See "Impetigo", section on 'Bullous impetigo'.)

MANAGEMENT — 

The management of AGEP involves withdrawal of the offending drug, supportive care, and symptomatic treatment of pruritus and skin inflammation.

Drug withdrawal and supportive measures — Prompt withdrawal of the causative agent is the mainstay treatment of AGEP. In patients taking multiple drugs, the drugs suspected to be the cause of AGEP (table 1A) should be discontinued. Patients with severe AGEP and older or immunocompromised patients with fever and widespread eruption should be hospitalized for fluid, electrolyte, and nutritional support.

Symptomatic treatment — For symptomatic relief of pruritus and skin inflammation, we suggest topical, rather than systemic, corticosteroids. In case series and case reports, systemic corticosteroids did not shorten the disease course [20,58,87,88].

We use medium-potency corticosteroids (group four (table 2)). They are applied twice a day for one week. In the desquamation phase, emollients may be helpful in restoring the skin barrier function.

The use of topical corticosteroids for AGEP has not been evaluated in clinical trials. Their use is based upon small case series and clinical evidence of efficacy in other pruritic or inflammatory skin conditions [88,89].

Severe AGEP — For patients with atypical, severe disease, a short course of systemic corticosteroids (methylprednisolone or prednisone 1 mg/kg for 7 to 14 days with variable taper) may be indicated. (See "Glucocorticoid withdrawal", section on 'Tapering regimens'.)

Low-dose oral cyclosporine at the dose of 3 to 5 mg/kg/day tapered over two weeks has also been used in a few patients with severe disease [90]. A single 900 mg dose of spesolimab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the IL-36 receptor approved for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis, has been successfully used in two patients with refractory AGEP [91,92].

Evidence supporting the use of systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressants or immunoregulators for the treatment of severe AGEP is limited to case reports and small case series. In a single-institution retrospective study that included 31 hospitalized patients with severe AGEP, systemic corticosteroids (methylprednisolone or prednisone 1 mg/kg) or oral cyclosporine 3 mg/kg daily were similarly effective in inducing rapid clinical improvement and cessation of pustule formation [90].

PROGNOSIS — 

In most patients, AGEP resolves spontaneously without sequelae. Mortality rate of 2 percent has been reported in a pharmacovigilance study in France [11]. In another study from the United States, all-cause mortality within 30 days was 3.5 percent, but no death was suspected to be due to AGEP [5].

FUTURE DRUG AVOIDANCE — 

Since re-exposure to the causative agent can induce another episode of AGEP, patients should be counseled to avoid the offending drug and be provided with a written list of the generic and brand names of the offending drug [93,94]. The offending drug(s) should be listed as a cause of severe cutaneous adverse reaction in the patient's medical record.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — 

Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Drug allergy and hypersensitivity".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Definition and etiology – Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, acute hypersensitivity reaction in most cases caused by drugs, most often antibiotics, calcium channel blockers, and antimalarials (table 1A-B). (See 'Eliciting factors' above.)

Clinical presentation and course – AGEP is characterized by the development of numerous nonfollicular, sterile, small pustules on a background of edematous erythema a few hours to a few days after the administration of the offending drug (picture 2A-C) [1,2]. Fever above 38°C (100.4°F) and leukocytosis with a neutrophil count >7000/microL are usually present. Severe cases may present with atypical target lesions and coalescent pustules that result in superficial erosions and a clinical picture resembling Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). The eruption resolves spontaneously in one to two weeks after the discontinuation of the offending drug. (See 'Clinical presentation' above and 'Clinical course and complications' above.)

Diagnosis – The diagnosis of AGEP is based on the clinical presentation and histologic examination of a skin biopsy (picture 1A). The rapid resolution of the eruption after drug discontinuation also supports the diagnosis. (See 'Diagnostic criteria' above and 'Biopsy' above.)

Management

Drug withdrawal and supportive treatment – Prompt withdrawal of the causative agent is the mainstay of treatment of AGEP. Patients with severe AGEP and older or immunocompromised patients with fever and widespread eruption should be hospitalized for fluid, electrolyte, and nutritional support. (See 'Drug withdrawal and supportive measures' above.)

Symptomatic treatment – For symptomatic relief of pruritus and skin inflammation, we suggest topical, rather than systemic, corticosteroids (Grade 2C). We generally use medium- to high-potency topical corticosteroids (groups 1 to 4 (table 2)). They are applied twice a day for one week. (See 'Symptomatic treatment' above.)

Severe AGEP – For patients with atypical, severe disease, we suggest a short course of systemic corticosteroids in addition to supportive measures (Grade 2C). Oral prednisone can be given at the dose of 1 mg/kg for 7 to 14 days with variable taper. Low-dose oral cyclosporine at the dose of 3 to 5 mg/kg/day tapered over two weeks is an alternative treatment option. (See 'Severe AGEP' above.)

Prognosis and prevention – In most patients, AGEP resolves spontaneously without sequelae. Patients should be counseled to avoid the offending drug and be provided with a written list of the generic and brand names of the offending drug. (See 'Prognosis' above and 'Future drug avoidance' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — 

The editorial staff at UpToDate acknowledge Alexis Sidoroff, MD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

  1. Sidoroff A, Halevy S, Bavinck JN, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)--a clinical reaction pattern. J Cutan Pathol 2001; 28:113.
  2. Speeckaert MM, Speeckaert R, Lambert J, Brochez L. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: an overview of the clinical, immunological and diagnostic concepts. Eur J Dermatol 2010; 20:425.
  3. Parisi R, Shah H, Navarini AA, et al. Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis: Clinical Features, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. Am J Clin Dermatol 2023; 24:557.
  4. Roujeau JC, Bioulac-Sage P, Bourseau C, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Analysis of 63 cases. Arch Dermatol 1991; 127:1333.
  5. Creadore A, Desai S, Alloo A, et al. Clinical Characteristics, Disease Course, and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis in the US. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:176.
  6. Ji YZ, Geng L, Qu HM, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by docetaxel. Int J Dermatol 2011; 50:763.
  7. Nakamizo S, Kobayashi S, Usui T, et al. Clopidogrel-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis with elevated Th17 cytokine levels as determined by a drug lymphocyte stimulation test. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162:1402.
  8. Son CH, Lee CU, Roh MS, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis as a manifestation of carbamazepine hypersensitivity syndrome. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2008; 18:461.
  9. Sidoroff A, Dunant A, Viboud C, et al. Risk factors for acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)-results of a multinational case-control study (EuroSCAR). Br J Dermatol 2007; 157:989.
  10. Godfrey H, Jedlowski P, Thiede R. Medication Associations With Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: A Case/Non-Case Analysis Using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. J Cutan Med Surg 2024; 28:51.
  11. Saissi EH, Beau-Salinas F, Jonville-Béra AP, et al. [Drugs associated with acute generalized exanthematic pustulosis]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2003; 130:612.
  12. Birnie AJ, Litlewood SM. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis does not always have a drug-related cause. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159:492.
  13. Manzano S, Guggisberg D, Hammann C, Laubscher B. [Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: first case associated with a Chlamydia pneumoniae infection]. Arch Pediatr 2006; 13:1230.
  14. Ofuji S, Yamamoto O. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis associated with a human parvovirus B19 infection. J Dermatol 2007; 34:121.
  15. Cannistraci C, Parola IL, RiganO R, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis in cystic echinococcosis: immunological characterization. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:1245.
  16. Makris M, Spanoudaki N, Giannoula F, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) triggered by a spider bite. Allergol Int 2009; 58:301.
  17. Davidovici BB, Pavel D, Cagnano E, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis following a spider bite: report of 3 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55:525.
  18. Zaraa I, Ben Taazayet S, Trojjet S, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by the essential oil of Pistacia lentiscus. Clin Exp Dermatol 2012; 37:361.
  19. Yoon TY, Lee DY, Kim YJ, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by velvet antler. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165:447.
  20. Choi MJ, Kim HS, Park HJ, et al. Clinicopathologic manifestations of 36 korean patients with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a case series and review of the literature. Ann Dermatol 2010; 22:163.
  21. Kim SJ, Lee T, Lee YS, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis caused by radiocontrast media. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2010; 105:492.
  22. Hammerbeck AA, Daniels NH, Callen JP. Ioversol-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a case report. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145:683.
  23. Arai Y, Okamura K, Saito T, et al. A case of acute localized exanthematous pustulosis following COVID-19 infection. J Dermatol 2024; 51:e37.
  24. De Brucker L, Seyler L, Leemans G, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis in a patient with COVID-19 infection. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023.
  25. Wung CH, Wang CW, Lai KC, et al. Current understanding of genetic associations with delayed hypersensitivity reactions induced by antibiotics and anti-osteoporotic drugs. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1183491.
  26. Ueda T, Abe M, Okiyama R, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis due to allylisopropylacetylurea: role of IL-17-producing T cells. Eur J Dermatol 2011; 21:140.
  27. Smith K, Norwood C, Skelton H. Do the physical and histologic features and time course in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis reflect a pattern of cytokine dysregulation? J Cutan Med Surg 2003; 7:7.
  28. Britschgi M, Pichler WJ. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, a clue to neutrophil-mediated inflammatory processes orchestrated by T cells. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2002; 2:325.
  29. Britschgi M, Steiner UC, Schmid S, et al. T-cell involvement in drug-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. J Clin Invest 2001; 107:1433.
  30. Britschgi M, von Greyerz S, Burkhart C, Pichler WJ. Molecular aspects of drug recognition by specific T cells. Curr Drug Targets 2003; 4:1.
  31. Pichler WJ. T cells in drug allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2002; 2:9.
  32. Schmid S, Kuechler PC, Britschgi M, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: role of cytotoxic T cells in pustule formation. Am J Pathol 2002; 161:2079.
  33. Tokura Y, Mori T, Hino R. Psoriasis and other Th17-mediated skin diseases. J UOEH 2010; 32:317.
  34. Kabashima R, Sugita K, Sawada Y, et al. Increased circulating Th17 frequencies and serum IL-22 levels in patients with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011; 25:485.
  35. Benezeder T, Bordag N, Woltsche J, et al. IL-36-driven pustulosis: Transcriptomic signatures match between generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). J Allergy Clin Immunol 2025.
  36. Onoufriadis A, Simpson MA, Pink AE, et al. Mutations in IL36RN/IL1F5 are associated with the severe episodic inflammatory skin disease known as generalized pustular psoriasis. Am J Hum Genet 2011; 89:432.
  37. Navarini AA, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Setta-Kaffetzi N, et al. Rare variations in IL36RN in severe adverse drug reactions manifesting as acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133:1904.
  38. Nakai N, Sugiura K, Akiyama M, Katoh N. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis caused by dihydrocodeine phosphate in a patient with psoriasis vulgaris and a heterozygous IL36RN mutation. JAMA Dermatol 2015; 151:311.
  39. Meier-Schiesser B, Feldmeyer L, Jankovic D, et al. Culprit Drugs Induce Specific IL-36 Overexpression in Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis. J Invest Dermatol 2019; 139:848.
  40. Burrows NP, Russell Jones RR. Pustular drug eruptions: a histopathological spectrum. Histopathology 1993; 22:569.
  41. Halevy S, Kardaun SH, Davidovici B, et al. The spectrum of histopathological features in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a study of 102 cases. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163:1245.
  42. Prange B, Marini A, Kalke A, et al. [Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP)]. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2005; 3:210.
  43. Betto P, Germi L, Bonoldi E, Bertazzoni M. Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP) caused by amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Int J Dermatol 2008; 47:295.
  44. Rastogi S, Modi M, Dhawan V. Acute localized exanthematous pustulosis (ALEP) caused by Ibuprofen. A case report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 47:132.
  45. Peermohamed S, Haber RM. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis simulating toxic epidermal necrolysis: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol 2011; 147:697.
  46. Azib S, Florin V, Fourrier F, et al. Severe acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis with blistering mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis, associated with a primary mumps infection. Clin Exp Dermatol 2014; 39:723.
  47. van Hattem S, Beerthuizen GI, Kardaun SH. Severe flucloxacillin-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), with toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)-like features: does overlap between AGEP and TEN exist? Clinical report and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171:1539.
  48. Meiss F, Helmbold P, Meykadeh N, et al. Overlap of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and toxic epidermal necrolysis: response to antitumour necrosis factor-alpha antibody infliximab: report of three cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21:717.
  49. Kardaun SH. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), presenting with toxic epidermal necrolysis-like features, due to morphine: a neglected culprit? Eur J Dermatol 2011; 21:427.
  50. Wensween CA, Bouwes Bavinck JN. [Overlapping acute disseminated exanthematous pustulosis and toxic epidermal necrolysis]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001; 145:1525.
  51. Kostopoulos TC, Krishna SM, Brinster NK, Ortega-Loayza AG. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: atypical presentations and outcomes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29:209.
  52. O'Brian M, Carr CL, Thomas C, et al. Clinical characteristics and management of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis with haemodynamic instability. Skin Health Dis 2021; 1:e74.
  53. Jakkidi M, Basmadjian C, Roy S. An illusion of septic shock: acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis with multiorgan dysfunction. BMJ Case Rep 2017; 2017.
  54. Copaescu AM, Bouffard D, Masse MS. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis simulating toxic epidermal necrolysis: case presentation and literature review. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2020; 16:9.
  55. Cravero K, Chakrala T, Shychuk A. Multisystem organ failure secondary to acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) with atypical presentation resembling septic shock. BMJ Case Rep 2022; 15.
  56. Tajmir-Riahi A, Wörl P, Harrer T, et al. Life-Threatening Atypical Case of Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2017; 174:108.
  57. Hotz C, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Haddad C, et al. Systemic involvement of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a retrospective study on 58 patients. Br J Dermatol 2013; 169:1223.
  58. Alniemi DT, Wetter DA, Bridges AG, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: clinical characteristics, etiologic associations, treatments, and outcomes in a series of 28 patients at Mayo Clinic, 1996-2013. Int J Dermatol 2017; 56:405.
  59. Treudler R, Grunewald S, Gebhardt C, Simon JC. Prolonged course of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis with liver involvement due to sensitization to amoxicillin and paracetamol. Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89:314.
  60. Brandenburg VM, Kurts C, Eitner F, et al. Acute reversible renal failure in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:1857.
  61. Ardern-Jones MR, Mockenhaupt M. Making a diagnosis in severe cutaneous drug hypersensitivity reactions. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 19:283.
  62. Kardaun SH, Kuiper H, Fidler V, Jonkman MF. The histopathological spectrum of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) and its differentiation from generalized pustular psoriasis. J Cutan Pathol 2010; 37:1220.
  63. de Groot AC. Results of patch testing in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP): A literature review. Contact Dermatitis 2022; 87:119.
  64. Friedmann PS, Ardern-Jones M. Patch testing in drug allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 10:291.
  65. Barbaud A. Drug patch testing in systemic cutaneous drug allergy. Toxicology 2005; 209:209.
  66. Woodruff CM, Botto N. The Role of Patch Testing in Evaluating Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Medications. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2022; 62:548.
  67. Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O, Fléchet ML, et al. Patch testing in severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35:234.
  68. Pinho A, Coutinho I, Gameiro A, et al. Patch testing - a valuable tool for investigating non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions to antibiotics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31:280.
  69. Barbaud A, Collet E, Milpied B, et al. A multicentre study to determine the value and safety of drug patch tests for the three main classes of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Br J Dermatol 2013; 168:555.
  70. Mashiah J, Brenner S. A systemic reaction to patch testing for the evaluation of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139:1181.
  71. Lazarov A, Livni E, Halevy S. Generalized pustular drug eruptions: confirmation by in vitro tests. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1998; 10:36.
  72. Halevy S, Cohen A, Livni E. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis associated with polysensitivity to paracetamol and bromhexine: the diagnostic role of in vitro interferon-gamma release test. Clin Exp Dermatol 2000; 25:652.
  73. Beltraminelli HS, Lerch M, Arnold A, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by the antifungal terbinafine: case report and review of the literature. Br J Dermatol 2005; 152:780.
  74. Girardi M, Duncan KO, Tigelaar RE, et al. Cross-comparison of patch test and lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with a history of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Am J Dermatopathol 2005; 27:343.
  75. Gössinger E, Dodiuk-Gad R, Mühleisen B, et al. Generalized Pustular Psoriasis, Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis, and Other Pustular Reactions: A Clinical Review. Dermatol Clin 2024; 42:317.
  76. Natkunarajah J, Ostlere L. Severe acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis with blistering, mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis. Clin Exp Dermatol 2012; 37:188.
  77. Bouvresse S, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Ortonne N, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis, DRESS, AGEP: do overlap cases exist? Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012; 7:72.
  78. Cheng S, Edmonds E, Ben-Gashir M, Yu RC. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis: 50 years on. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33:229.
  79. Kasha EE Jr, Epinette WW. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis (Sneddon-Wilkinson disease) in association with a monoclonal IgA gammopathy: a report and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988; 19:854.
  80. Butt A, Burge SM. Sneddon-Wilkinson disease in association with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Dermatol 1995; 132:313.
  81. Brantley EI, Sheth P. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and diffuse scleroderma. Dermatol Online J 2009; 15:5.
  82. Ahmad K, Ramsay B. Pyoderma gangrenosum associated with subcorneal pustular dermatosis and IgA myeloma. Clin Exp Dermatol 2009; 34:46.
  83. Brown SJ, Barrett PD, Hendrick A, Langtry JA. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis in association with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Acta Derm Venereol 2003; 83:306.
  84. Girijala RL, Siddiqi I, Kwak Y, et al. Pustular DRESS Syndrome Secondary to Hydroxychloroquine With EBV Reactivation. J Drugs Dermatol 2019; 18:207.
  85. Teo WL, Pang SM, Koh HY. Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis manifestations. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2011; 30:243.
  86. Ben Salem C, Fathallah N, Saidi W, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis as a manifestation of anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome. Ann Pharmacother 2010; 44:1681.
  87. Chang SL, Huang YH, Yang CH, et al. Clinical manifestations and characteristics of patients with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis in Asia. Acta Derm Venereol 2008; 88:363.
  88. Lee HY, Chou D, Pang SM, Thirumoorthy T. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: analysis of cases managed in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Int J Dermatol 2010; 49:507.
  89. Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Hotz C, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: a retrospective audit of practice between 1994 and 2011 at a single centre. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172:1455.
  90. Yanes D, Nguyen E, Imadojemu S, Kroshinsky D. Cyclosporine for treatment of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: A retrospective analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 83:263.
  91. Xuan Y, Jin S, Zhang C, Wang S. Rapid Improvement in Refractory Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis With Spesolimab. JAMA Dermatol 2024; 160:1009.
  92. Russo G, Dumont S, Menzinger S, et al. Severe Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis Successfully Treated by Spesolimab. Acta Derm Venereol 2024; 104:adv41311.
  93. Gréco M, Plantin P. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) induced by terbinafine with involuntary positive reintroduction. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15:116.
  94. Park JJ, Yun SJ, Lee JB, et al. A case of hydroxychloroquine induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis confirmed by accidental oral provocation. Ann Dermatol 2010; 22:102.
Topic 15761 Version 22.0

References