ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : -7 مورد

Gaucher disease: Initial assessment, monitoring, and prognosis

Gaucher disease: Initial assessment, monitoring, and prognosis
Authors:
Derralynn Hughes, MD
Ellen Sidransky, MD
Section Editor:
Sheldon L Kaplan, MD
Deputy Editor:
Jessica Kremen, MD
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: Aug 06, 2024.

INTRODUCTION — 

Gaucher disease (GD) is an inborn error of metabolism that affects the recycling of cellular glycolipids. GD is one of the most common lysosomal diseases. In GD, glucocerebroside (also called glucosylceramide) and several related compounds that ordinarily are degraded to glucose and lipid components accumulate within the lysosomes of cells.

GD, which often involves the visceral organs, bone marrow, and bone, is categorized into three clinical types. Type 1 (GD1, MIM #230800) is the most common. It is distinguished from type 2 (GD2, MIM #230900) and type 3 (GD3, MIM #231000) by the lack of characteristic involvement of the central nervous system (CNS).

Additional resources for information about GD for patients and caregivers are listed in the table (table 1). Guidelines for the evaluation and monitoring of children and adults with GD, based on published data from international consensus panels, are incorporated into the discussion in this topic review [1-11].

The initial assessment and routine monitoring of patients with GD will be discussed here. The pathogenesis, genetics, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment are discussed separately. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis" and "Gaucher disease: Treatment".)

INITIAL ASSESSMENT — 

Each patient should undergo a comprehensive initial assessment of all potentially affected organ systems since there is significant variability in the manifestations, severity, and progression of GD that could impact treatment options (table 2) [12-14]. The initial assessment involves confirmation of deficiency of glucocerebrosidase (also known as glucosylceramidase or acid beta-glucosidase [GCase]); genotyping of GBA1, the gene encoding GCase; and a complete family medical history [5,13]. An international working group on GD patient-centered guidelines suggests that chitotriosidase activity, pulmonary and activated-regulated chemokine/chemokine [C-C motif] ligand 18 (PARC/CCL18), or glucosylsphingosine (GlcSph) concentrations can be used as a first-line test when the diagnosis of GD is suspected [15]. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Diagnosis'.)

A differential diagnosis of importance for patients with clinical features of GD is acid sphingomyelinase deficiency [16]. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Differential diagnosis'.)

Many of the initial assessments are also routinely performed as part of ongoing disease monitoring (table 3). (See 'Routine monitoring' below.)

Family history — The family history should include [1,2]:

Information about ethnicity and consanguinity since GD is an autosomal recessive disorder and certain variants are more common in specific populations. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Genetics'.)

Information about disease history in parents and/or affected siblings.

Information about Parkinson disease or Lewy body dementia in parents, grandparents, or siblings.

Information regarding a history of blood transfusions, splenectomy, pathologic fractures, bone pain, joint replacements, dyspnea, bleeding tendency, myeloma, or perinatal deaths/hydrops fetalis. Presence of a history of any of these could suggest undiagnosed GD in a family member and gives an overall idea of potential disease severity. A study of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) found that approximately 1:150 had homozygous or compound heterozygous GBA pathogenic variants consistent with GD [17]. In addition, rare disease algorithms are under development to identify patients at risk for GD from scrutiny of electronic health records [18].

Examination — Physical examination can provide important information regarding disease severity, rate of progression, and response to therapy [12]. Important aspects of the examination include [1,2,19]:

General appearance, demeanor, mood, and affect.

Weight, height, and head circumference percentiles, plotted on growth charts standardized for age and sex. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Growth/development' and "Measurement of growth in children".)

Examination of the skin for bruising, petechiae, pallor, and increased pigmentation. If examining a neonate, specifically look for ichthyosis. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Bone marrow disease'.)

Eye examination for pingueculae (small, soft, brownish patches of tissue on the sclerae, just beyond the iris) that are nonspecific findings sometimes seen in adult patients with GD.

The eye examination should also include evaluation for strabismus and/or abnormal saccadic eye movements [20]. Additional ophthalmologic evaluation for patients who lack an N370S allele and are at risk for neuronopathic disease is discussed below. (See 'Neurologic' below.)

Palpation of the abdomen for enlarged liver and/or spleen and measurement of abdominal girth (the abdominal examination is supplemental to the radiologic evaluation). (See 'Radiology evaluation' below and "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Visceral disease'.)

Gait, range of joint motion, muscle strength, and bone tenderness. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Skeletal disease'.)

Assessment of pubertal status. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Growth/development' and "Normal puberty".)

Evaluation for developmental delay (in children). (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Presentation' and "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Type 2 (GD2)' and "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Type 3 (GD3)'.)

Examination of the spine for kyphosis (including gibbus deformity, a particular form of kyphosis with a sharp angulation) and scoliosis (image 1). (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Skeletal disease' and "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Type 3 (GD3)'.)

Neurologic — The presence of neurologic complications has important implications for prognosis and treatment and should be determined as soon as possible after diagnosis [1,2]. Thorough neurologic examination is critical for detecting evidence of neuronopathic disease in patients with suspect genotypes (ie, without an N370S allele) [19], neurologic symptoms, a sibling with proven neuronopathic GD, and/or onset of severe systemic GD before two years of age [4].

All patients should undergo a thorough neurologic evaluation at baseline (table 4) [4,21,22]. While this evaluation is particularly important in young children, it should not be ignored in adults, as some milder presentations of neuronopathic GD have only emerged in adult years. This assessment should include:

Neurologic examination performed by a neurologist, preferably a pediatric neurologist.

Eye movement examination, preferably by an ophthalmologist since the signs of ocular involvement can be difficult to detect in young children [23].

Additional neuroophthalmologic investigation, including direct ophthalmoscopy or electrooculography. White vitreous opacities have been reported in GD3 [24].

Measurement of hearing (by otoacoustic emission audiometry [OAE]) in young children and pure tone audiometry in older patients. (See "Hearing loss in children: Screening and evaluation".)

Electroencephalography and diagnostic brainstem-evoked responses [25].

Neurocognitive testing, with widely available protocols (eg, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III), ideally performed when the patient is sufficiently healthy to permit meaningful assessment [26].

Evaluation of swallow by fluoroscopy in very young patients with choking episodes or failure to thrive [27].

Assessment of facial features using artificial intelligence can sometimes help establish the type of GD [28].

Audiometric testing may be helpful to evaluate brainstem disease in GD3 disease. In one study, children with this condition had abnormalities that included bilaterally increased acoustic reflexes, poor medial olivocochlear suppression, and very poor brainstem-evoked potentials [29]. Abnormalities of brainstem-evoked potential in GD3 correlated with cognitive dysfunction and disease severity in another series [30].

Psychosocial — Assessment of the child's social and educational development may require the involvement of the child's school and teachers [2]. Detailed psychometric assessments (eg, intelligence quotient [IQ] testing) should be conducted for patients at risk for developing neuronopathic disease with particular attention to verbal and performance IQ [26]. In addition, signs of depression should be noted.

Cardiopulmonary — Cardiopulmonary involvement is rare in children with GD1 (table 5) but should be excluded at baseline in symptomatic patients [2]. Pulmonary hypertension is seen in some adults with GD1. Risk factors for severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with GD include pathogenic variants other than N370S, a family history of pulmonary hypertension, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) I gene polymorphism, asplenia, and female sex [31]. Children who are compound heterozygotes and carry severe pathogenic variants such as c.84insG or IVS2+1 are more likely to have progressive pulmonary involvement. Cardiac valvular abnormalities are found in a rare subtype of GD3 associated with genotype D409H/D409H [32]. Increased pulmonary markings are often seen on chest radiograph in other patients with GD3 [33]. This finding is associated with pulmonary infiltration of Gaucher storage macrophages.

Evaluation in children may include chest radiograph, high-resolution computed tomography (CT) thoracic imaging, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and pulmonary function tests (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1] or peak expiratory flow rates [PEFR]). In adults, pulmonary evaluation should include a Doppler echocardiogram to estimate right ventricular systolic pressure [5,34]. (See "Overview of pulmonary function testing in children" and "Treatment and prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults (group 1)".)

Laboratory evaluation — The initial laboratory evaluation should include measurement of hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, blood chemistries, liver function studies, iron studies and ferritin, thyroid function studies, and coagulation studies. Measurement of glucocerebrosidase (also known as glucosylceramidase or acid beta-glucosidase [GCase]) and/or genotyping of GBA1 should be performed if these were not part of the diagnostic process. A serum electrophoresis and serum-free light chains should also be obtained at baseline to evaluate for clonal gammopathies in adults. Polyclonal gammopathy has also been described in children. (See 'Routine monitoring' below and 'Additional evaluation' below.)

Biochemical marker such as CCL18/PARC (table 3) [2,35-38], chitotriosidase, and glucosylsphingosine (often denoted lyso GL-1) can be used in monitoring disease progression [39-41]. The absolute concentrations are not helpful, but serial increases may be an early indicator of clinical relapse and should prompt investigation of disease status and compliance with therapy [42]:

Glucosylsphingosine is the best biomarker of disease activity. It is usually elevated at diagnosis, correlates with phenotype, and declines over time with enzyme replacement [39,43-45]. Thus, this biomarker can be used to help determine when to initiate or modify treatment. Testing for this biomarker is available for clinical monitoring in many laboratories.

Chitotriosidase, a chitinase, is a marker of "alternative" type macrophage activation that is overexpressed by the Gaucher cell. Its activity is increased in patients with GD and decreases in response to enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in conjunction with other indicators of clinical response [35,36,46], although activity of chitotriosidase is absent in 6 to 8 percent of patients who have a pathogenic variant in the chitotriosidase gene [12]. Measurement of chitotriosidase can be performed at baseline and periodically during therapy [47], but glucosylsphingosine monitoring has replaced chitotriosidase in monitoring disease burden.

The chemokine CCL18/PARC is a marker of alternatively activated macrophages that is elevated in GD [48,49]. Concentrations of this protein correlate with several aspects of visceral and bony disease severity and respond to enzyme treatment in a similar manner to chitotriosidase [50,51].

ACE and acid phosphatase are also elevated at baseline but have less utility in monitoring disease response to therapy [52]. Other biomarkers are under investigation for use in diagnosis and prediction of severity. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Pathology findings'.)

Radiology evaluation — The initial radiology assessment should include various examinations to evaluate liver and spleen volume and the extent and severity of skeletal disease [1,2,5]. These studies may be helpful in determining whether ERT is indicated and are also used to monitor response to therapy. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Radiologic findings'.)

The initial radiologic evaluation may include:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or abdominal ultrasonography of the liver and spleen to help determine severity of hepatosplenomegaly and evaluate for cirrhosis, hepatic or splenic fibrosis, or the presence of focal splenic lesions, which are associated with poor platelet and splenic response to therapy [53,54]. MRI and ultrasonography are used to monitor response of hepatosplenomegaly to therapy. Volumetric CT should only be used if the other modalities are unavailable or contraindicated (eg, the patient has a pacemaker) to minimize radiation exposure [3,55]. Manual quantification of spleen volumes may be labor intensive; however, deep learning approaches may give a more accurate result and improve diagnostic and monitoring outcomes [56].

When available, MRI of the femoral head and lumbar spine to detect bone marrow infiltration, bone infarction, bone crises, and osteonecrosis (coronal T1- and T2-weighted scan) [2,3,5]. T1-weighted MRI is the most sensitive means of assessing marrow infiltration, and T2-weighted MRI is the most sensitive method of detecting active bone infarcts.

There are several systems to grade marrow infiltration in GD, among which the Bone Marrow Burden Score is most widely used [57]. Bone marrow infiltration varies considerably from site to site within a patient [58]. A nonhomogeneous pattern of bone marrow involvement (type B marrow morphology) and extensive marrow packing were associated with avascular necrosis of the femoral head in one study, suggesting that MRI may be a useful tool for identifying patients at high risk of this outcome [59].

Determination of the skeletal age in children (according to the method of Greulich and Pyle) to assess growth [60].

Anteroposterior view of the entire femora and lateral view of the spine [61] since skeletal disease can occur without symptoms, particularly compression fractures of the spine and femoral head [3]. These radiographs will provide information regarding old fractures, cystic bone changes, osteopenia, and other bone changes, such as the Erlenmeyer flask deformity of long bones.

Radiographs of other skeletal sites as indicated by symptoms. Patients with GD have a high risk of fragility fracture. Radiographic cortical thickness index (ratio of cortical width minus endosteal width to cortical width at a level of 10 cm below the minor trochanter) of 0.5 or less has been found to be a reliable independent predictor of fracture risk in GD [62].

Chest radiographs, especially in children with suspected GD3.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and nondominant femoral neck may be used to measure generalized osteopenia [61,63,64], although age-specific normative data for children are limited [65].

Biomarkers including glucosylsphingosine can be helpful in monitoring for osteonecrosis [66,67].

Baseline imaging (ultrasounds and routine films) is often sufficient in young children. Sedation may be necessary, though, if additional studies such as MRI or CT are required. The risk of sedation in these settings appears to be acceptably low when performed in accordance with published guidelines [68]. Nevertheless, the need for sedation limits the general applicability of MRI for routine follow-up assessment. (See "Procedural sedation in children: Approach".)

Functional health and well-being — Children with GD are subject to the same psychosocial problems as any child with a chronic disease (anger, fear, insecurity, isolation) [2]. Visceromegaly, growth abnormalities, and delayed puberty may affect their body image and self-esteem. These feelings may be exacerbated by fatigue and restrictions on physical activity. Chronic pain, fatigue, and missed school may affect school performance [2]. (See 'Psychosocial' above.)

Functional health and well-being can be assessed through a survey instrument such as the short form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), which is validated for individuals ≥14 years of age [2]. Younger patients and their parents/caregivers should be questioned regarding the effects of GD on physical and social function, particularly with regard to pain and fatigue. (See "Evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with a serious life-threatening illness".)

The occurrence and severity of pain (using a recognized pain assessment tool) should be monitored at each visit [3,12]. The use of a recognized pain assessment tool is recommended [12]. In young children, pain severity may be assessed with a visual analog scale, such as the faces pain scales [69,70]. (See "Pain in children: Approach to pain assessment and overview of management principles" and "Evaluation of chronic pain in adults", section on 'Pain assessment'.)

A GD-specific patient-reported outcome has been developed and may be useful in understanding the impact of therapy on patient well-being [71,72].

Information about GD for patients and caregivers is available through Patient Associations and other resources (table 1).

ROUTINE MONITORING — 

Routine monitoring of disease activity should be performed in all patients (table 3) [1,73]. The schedule is individualized according to the patient's clinical course, whether the patient is receiving treatment, and, if so, the response to therapy (table 3). Reassessment is also performed when the dose of enzyme therapy or treatment modality is changed or if significant complications develop [5]. Additional studies are recommended as indicated to monitor for other associated features, including B12 and vitamin D deficiency, iron overload, autoimmune disease, platelet dysfunction, lipid abnormalities, and hematologic malignancy. Annual monitoring of protein electrophoresis and serum-free light chains are recommended in adults since there is an elevated risk of myeloma. Consensus minimum recommendations for effective monitoring of patients are provided by the International Collaborative Gaucher Group (ICGG) [5]. Patients who are unable to achieve their therapeutic goals should also undergo evaluation for confounding factors (eg, poor compliance with therapy, development of comorbid conditions, or development of neutralizing antibody). (See "Gaucher disease: Treatment" and 'Initial assessment' above and 'Additional evaluation' below.)

Careful monitoring is especially important in patients who are not prescribed treatment or who refuse treatment. Aspects of the assessment that should be repeated at regular intervals throughout life include:

A complete physical examination. (See 'Examination' above.)

Close neurologic monitoring (table 6), particularly in at-risk patients (ie, children without the N370S variant or with a variant associated with neuronopathic disease), since neurologic involvement is insidious in some patients [1,3,4,74-76]. Older adults should be screened for parkinsonian manifestations. (See 'Neurologic' above.)

Measurement of hemoglobin, platelet counts, and biomarkers [77]. (See 'Laboratory evaluation' above.)

Radiologic assessment of visceral and skeletal involvement, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or abdominal ultrasonography of the liver and spleen, MRI (or radiographs if MRI is not available) of the femoral head and lumbar spine, assessment of the skeletal age in children if growth is delayed, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and nondominant femoral neck. (See 'Radiology evaluation' above.)

Assessment of pain and patient-reported quality of life. (See 'Functional health and well-being' above.)

ADDITIONAL EVALUATION — 

Additional evaluation may be indicated in some patients at the time of the initial assessment and/or during the clinical course depending upon the manifestation of interest or the therapeutic goal that is not achieved. A validated disease severity scoring system for GD1 in adults is available for use in monitoring intrapatient change over time [78,79].

Anemia — Additional evaluation for anemia may include measurement of iron, iron-binding capacity, vitamin B12, white blood cell (WBC) count, and serum immunoelectrophoresis. The incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency is increased among Ashkenazi Jews in Israel [80]. In addition, a decline in hemoglobin concentration, whether acute or gradual, should prompt evaluation for blood loss [12]. (See "Approach to the child with anemia" and "Diagnostic approach to anemia in adults".)

Bleeding — Patients with a history of bleeding tendency at the time of diagnosis may require evaluation for a bleeding diathesis. Abnormalities of various coagulation factors and qualitative platelet deficits have been reported in GD [5,81,82], and it may be useful to look for these abnormalities of coagulation at baseline [3,12]. Evaluation may include measure of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) and assessment of platelet function [77]. (See "Approach to the child with bleeding symptoms" and "Approach to the adult with a suspected bleeding disorder".)

Hepatomegaly — Evaluation of liver function is indicated in patients with marked hepatomegaly or portal hypertension [83]. This evaluation may include assessment of exposure to alcohol, hepatotoxic medications, blood products, sexually transmitted viral pathogens, and intravenous drug use. Measurement of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, albumin, total protein, and total and direct bilirubin are routine in most clinical settings. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are measured every 6 to 12 months in patients with fibrosis or other liver abnormalities to screen for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Liver imaging by ultrasound (including Doppler assessment of portal blood flow) will determine whether gross scarring and/or portal hypertension is present. Additional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and liver biopsy may be necessary to reveal evidence of fibrosis or iron overload [84]. Liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography were higher in splenectomized Gaucher patients [85].

Testing for viral hepatitis and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) should be performed in patients who have a history of blood transfusion, intravenous or other parenteral illicit drug use, or who live in areas where infectious hepatitis is endemic [12]. (See "Epidemiology, transmission, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection" and "Epidemiology and transmission of hepatitis C virus infection".)

Clonal gammopathies — Clonal gammopathies are frequent among patients with GD [6]. Thus, serum electrophoresis and serum-free light chain quantification should be obtained at baseline and every 12 to 24 months in adults, particularly in patients who are older than 50 years (because of an increased risk of multiple myeloma) [86,87].

Skeletal disease — Measurement of serum calcium, phosphorous, alkaline phosphatase, and concentrations of vitamin D and parathyroid hormone may be indicated to exclude other causes of bone disease [88]. (See "Overview of rickets in children".)

Ischemia can be detected by technetium (Tc) bisphosphonate bone scintigraphy early in the course of bone pain crises when the changes are not yet visible on MRI [89]. Changes in (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintigraphy correlate with the main clinical features of GD [90]. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Skeletal disease' and 'Radiology evaluation' above.)

Quantitative chemical shift imaging (QCSI) measurement of bone marrow fat fraction correlates with bone complications and is sensitive to therapeutic effects of enzyme replacement [91]. However, availability of this type of imaging is limited.

Children and adolescents should be monitored for the development of scoliosis or kyphosis.

Pulmonary disease — Pulmonary involvement can be assessed by chest radiograph and/or pulmonary function testing. In adults, echocardiograms are recommended to screen for the development of pulmonary hypertension. In patients with GD, symptoms that could be associated with sleep apnea should prompt a sleep study. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension of unclear etiology in adults" and "Clinical presentation and diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adults" and "Evaluation of suspected obstructive sleep apnea in children".)

Neurologic disease — Peripheral neuropathy is a rare finding seen in GD, and neurophysiologic assessment is required in patients who present with suggestive findings. Patients and GD carriers with emergent neurologic symptoms should be evaluated for incident Parkinson disease. (See "Overview of polyneuropathy" and "Clinical manifestations of Parkinson disease" and "Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Parkinson disease".)

Growth retardation — Severe stunting of stature in children with GD is usually associated with severe visceral involvement [92]. Thus, other causes of growth retardation should be evaluated in otherwise mildly affected children [93]. (See "Causes of short stature".)

PROGNOSIS — 

The clinical course and life expectancy of GD1 is variable [12]. Severity can vary among siblings, even identical twins [94,95]. The spectrum ranges from disease discovered incidentally in older adults to fulminant disease presenting in early childhood. The disease can be progressive, but this occurs at different rates [96]. In general, the disease has rapid progression in severely affected children if left untreated but has a more insidious course in more mildly affected adults [96,97]. Thus, any rapid deterioration in adults requires evaluation for other causes. Stabilization of GD complications over time has been reported in untreated adults [98], as has spontaneous regression of disease manifestations [99]. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Type 1 (GD1)'.)

In a 2008 study based upon data from the Gaucher Registry, the estimated average life expectancy at birth for a patient with GD1 was 68 years compared with 77 years in the standard United States population [100]. However, this study included subjects from around the world, including children. Splenectomized and nonsplenectomized patients had a life expectancy of 64 years and 72 years, respectively. Prior to the treatment era, some symptomatic patients died prematurely from sequelae of splenectomy, severe bone disease, bleeding complications, infection, liver failure, or severe pulmonary disease [101]. It is likely that longevity will improve for treated patients. Attempts have been made to stratify patients with GD into clinical endotypes related to clinical manifestations and quality of life through detailed longitudinal data, with the most ready stratification of disease endotypes relating to splenectomy and the introduction of molecular therapies [102].

Asymptomatic parents and newborns with GD are often identified through prenatal and preconceptional screening as well as pilot newborn screening efforts [103]. Two studies following such children have concluded that the majority have not required intervention during the first decade of life [104,105].

In addition, patients with GD appear to have an increased risk of hematologic malignancy [87], including plasma cell myeloma, and other malignancies, such as hepatocellular carcinoma [86,106,107]. A review of data from 2742 patients in the International Gaucher Registry (92 percent with GD1, 81 percent treated with enzyme replacement therapy [ERT], median age in the third decade) indicated that the overall risk of cancer, including general hematologic malignancies, is not increased compared with the expected rate of individuals of the same age and sex [86]. However, the risk of plasma cell myeloma was increased (RR 5.9, 95% CI 2.9-10.8). All but one patient with multiple myeloma were older than 60 years. Multiple myeloma was reported in patients who had and had not been treated with ERT. Plasma cell myeloma should be evaluated and managed by a specialist in this condition.

An updated study with the registry was published in 2022 involving 2123 patients with GD1, comparing the incidence of various malignancies in the United States [87]. Overall, the risk in patients with GD compared with the general population was ninefold higher for multiple myeloma, fourfold higher for hematologic malignancies, and threefold higher for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In addition, GD patients were at increased risk for solid malignancies of the liver (2.9 times higher), kidney (2.8 times), melanoma (2.5 times), and breast (1.4 times). Age-specific incidence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) was unexpectedly higher even in younger patients, but the progression to multiple myeloma only occurred in 7.9 percent, which is comparable with the general population. There is no evidence that therapy for patients with myeloma and GD should vary from best practice for plasma cell myeloma, but particular attention should be given to bone marrow recovery after chemotherapy, which is potentially aided by ongoing GD-specific therapy. (See "Multiple myeloma: Clinical features, laboratory manifestations, and diagnosis".)

GD2 and GD3 are the neuronopathic forms. GD2 has the poorest prognosis of all types of GD. Patients have rapidly progressive neurologic deterioration, and death usually occurs before the child reaches two years of age. The average age of death was 11.7 months in one review of 15 original cases along with published data on 104 patients [108]. However, longevity can be increased with more aggressive therapies, although neurologic outcome remains dismal [109], with most surviving children requiring support with feeding tubes and tracheostomies. GD3 can be more severe and aggressive than GD1 but has a more variable course than GD2 [13,110]. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Type 2 (GD2)' and "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Type 3 (GD3)'.)

PREGNANCY — 

Normal pregnancies are reported in patients with GD. Pregnancy can exacerbate the symptoms of GD, particularly in females whose disease is not controlled by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) [47,111]. The risks of bone crises peripartum and hemorrhage postpartum are increased. There is an emerging consensus that there are benefits to continuation of ERT in pregnancy [112,113]. This option should be discussed by the clinician and patient. (See "Gaucher disease: Treatment".)

Females with GD can generally expect a good pregnancy outcome. A literature review found 24 citations between 1952 and 2001 describing 302 pregnancies in 190 untreated females [114]. The livebirth rate was 87 percent. Postpartum bleeding was the most common serious complication (4 of 23 ERT-treated patients and 4 of 43 untreated patients). Thus, these females should be considered at high risk and evaluated prepartum. In addition, blood and coagulation advice and support should be available at delivery. (See "Overview of postpartum hemorrhage".)

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — 

Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Gaucher disease".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Pathogenesis – Gaucher disease (GD) is caused by deficiency of glucocerebrosidase (also known as glucosylceramidase or acid beta-glucosidase [GCase]), which results in abnormal accumulation of glycolipids within cellular lysosomes. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Pathogenesis' and "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Genetics'.)

Initial assessment – Treatment decisions must be tailored to the individual patient because of the variability in the manifestations, severity, and progression of GD. Thus, each patient should undergo a comprehensive initial assessment of all potentially affected organ systems (table 7 and table 8 and table 9). (See 'Initial assessment' above.)

Neurologic evaluation – The presence of neurologic complications has important implications for prognosis and treatment and should be determined as soon as possible after diagnosis. At the time of diagnosis, a through objective assessment of eye movements and audiologic testing are recommended, and all children should undergo a thorough neurologic evaluation at baseline if these specialized tests are not available. (See 'Neurologic' above.)

Monitoring of disease activity – Routine monitoring of disease activity should be performed in all patients. The schedule is individualized according to the patient's clinical course, whether the patient is receiving treatment, and, if so, the response to therapy (table 3). In addition, reassessment should be performed when the dose of enzyme therapy is changed or if significant complications develop. (See 'Routine monitoring' above and "Gaucher disease: Treatment".)

Additional evaluation – Additional evaluation may be indicated in some patients at the time of the initial assessment and/or during the clinical course if they fail to achieve their therapeutic goals (table 7 and table 8 and table 9). The additional evaluation varies depending upon the manifestation of interest or the goal that is not achieved. (See 'Additional evaluation' above.)

Prognosis – The clinical course and life expectancy of GD type 1 (GD1) is variable. The estimated average life expectancy at birth for a patient with GD1 is approximately 68 years but may be increasing in the posttreatment era. In contrast, most patients with type 2 GD (GD2) die within the first years of life. GD type 3 (GD3) can be more severe and aggressive than GD1, but there is a broad spectrum of associated phenotypes. (See 'Prognosis' above.)

Management during pregnancy – Pregnancy can exacerbate the symptoms of GD, particularly in females whose disease is not controlled by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The risks of bone crises peripartum and hemorrhage postpartum are increased. (See 'Pregnancy' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — 

The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Patrick Deegan, MD, MRCPI, FRCP, who contributed to earlier versions of this topic review.

  1. Charrow J, Andersson HC, Kaplan P, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy and monitoring for children with type 1 Gaucher disease: consensus recommendations. J Pediatr 2004; 144:112.
  2. Grabowski GA, Andria G, Baldellou A, et al. Pediatric non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease: presentation, diagnosis and assessment. Consensus statements. Eur J Pediatr 2004; 163:58.
  3. Baldellou A, Andria G, Campbell PE, et al. Paediatric non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease: recommendations for treatment and monitoring. Eur J Pediatr 2004; 163:67.
  4. Vellodi A, Bembi B, de Villemeur TB, et al. Management of neuronopathic Gaucher disease: a European consensus. J Inherit Metab Dis 2001; 24:319.
  5. Weinreb NJ, Aggio MC, Andersson HC, et al. Gaucher disease type 1: revised recommendations on evaluations and monitoring for adult patients. Semin Hematol 2004; 41:15.
  6. Hughes D, Cappellini MD, Berger M, et al. Recommendations for the management of the haematological and onco-haematological aspects of Gaucher disease. Br J Haematol 2007; 138:676.
  7. Andersson HC, Charrow J, Kaplan P, et al. Individualization of long-term enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease. Genet Med 2005; 7:105.
  8. Biegstraaten M, Cox TM, Belmatoug N, et al. Management goals for type 1 Gaucher disease: An expert consensus document from the European working group on Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2016.
  9. Louw VJ, Fraser I, Giraldo P. Management goals of type 1 Gaucher disease in South Africa: An expert Delphi consensus document on good clinical practice. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290401.
  10. Giraldo P, Andrade-Campos M, Morales M, SEGA (SEguimiento del paciente de GAucher, Gaucher patient follow‐up) Group. Recommendations on the follow-up of patients with Gaucher disease in Spain: Results from a Delphi survey. JIMD Rep 2023; 64:90.
  11. Mehta A, Kuter DJ, Salek SS, et al. Presenting signs and patient co-variables in Gaucher disease: outcome of the Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED-C) Delphi initiative. Intern Med J 2019; 49:578.
  12. Pastores GM, Weinreb NJ, Aerts H, et al. Therapeutic goals in the treatment of Gaucher disease. Semin Hematol 2004; 41:4.
  13. Weinreb NJ, Goker-Alpan O, Kishnani PS, et al. The diagnosis and management of Gaucher disease in pediatric patients: Where do we go from here? Mol Genet Metab 2022; 136:4.
  14. Revel-Vilk S, Szer J, Mehta A, Zimran A. How we manage Gaucher Disease in the era of choices. Br J Haematol 2018; 182:467.
  15. Dardis A, Michelakakis H, Rozenfeld P, et al. Patient centered guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of Gaucher disease type 1. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:442.
  16. Oliva P, Schwarz M, Mechtler TP, et al. Importance to include differential diagnostics for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) in patients suspected to have to Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab 2023; 139:107563.
  17. Giuffrida G, Markovic U, Condorelli A, et al. Gaucher disease prevalence in 600 patients affected by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Eur J Haematol 2023; 111:922.
  18. Wilson A, Chiorean A, Aguiar M, et al. Development of a rare disease algorithm to identify persons at risk of Gaucher disease using electronic health records in the United States. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023; 18:280.
  19. Tayebi N, Walker J, Stubblefield B, et al. Gaucher disease with parkinsonian manifestations: does glucocerebrosidase deficiency contribute to a vulnerability to parkinsonism? Mol Genet Metab 2003; 79:104.
  20. Eghbali A, Hassan S, Seehra G, et al. Ophthalmological findings in Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab 2019; 127:23.
  21. Roshan Lal T, Sidransky E. The Spectrum of Neurological Manifestations Associated with Gaucher Disease. Diseases 2017; 5.
  22. Schiffmann R, Sevigny J, Rolfs A, et al. The definition of neuronopathic Gaucher disease. J Inherit Metab Dis 2020; 43:1056.
  23. Donald A, Tan CY, Chakrapani A, et al. Eye movement biomarkers allow for the definition of phenotypes in Gaucher Disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020; 15:349.
  24. Seehra GK, Eghbali A, Sidransky E, FitzGibbon E. White vitreous opacities in five patients with Gaucher disease type 3. Am J Med Genet A 2020; 182:808.
  25. Poffenberger CN, Inati S, Tayebi N, et al. EEG abnormalities in patients with chronic neuronopathic Gaucher disease: A retrospective review. Mol Genet Metab 2020; 131:358.
  26. Steward AM, Wiggs E, Lindstrom T, et al. Variation in cognitive function over time in Gaucher disease type 3. Neurology 2019; 93:e2272.
  27. Seehra G, Solomon B, Ryan E, et al. Five-parameter evaluation of dysphagia: A novel prognostic scale for assessing neurological decline in Gaucher disease type 2. Mol Genet Metab 2019; 127:191.
  28. Daykin E, Fleischer N, Abdelwahab M, et al. Investigation of a dysmorphic facial phenotype in patients with Gaucher disease types 2 and 3. Mol Genet Metab 2021; 134:274.
  29. Bamiou DE, Campbell P, Liasis A, et al. Audiometric abnormalities in children with Gaucher disease type 3. Neuropediatrics 2001; 32:136.
  30. Tantawy AA, Sherif EM, Adly AA, et al. Evoked potentials and neurocognitive functions in pediatric Egyptian Gaucher patients on enzyme replacement therapy: a single center experience. J Inherit Metab Dis 2013; 36:1025.
  31. Mistry PK, Sirrs S, Chan A, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in type 1 Gaucher's disease: genetic and epigenetic determinants of phenotype and response to therapy. Mol Genet Metab 2002; 77:91.
  32. Kurolap A, Del Toro M, Spiegel R, et al. Gaucher disease type 3c: New patients with unique presentations and review of the literature. Mol Genet Metab 2019; 127:138.
  33. Ramaswami U, Mengel E, Berrah A, et al. Throwing a spotlight on under-recognized manifestations of Gaucher disease: Pulmonary involvement, lymphadenopathy and Gaucheroma. Mol Genet Metab 2021; 133:335.
  34. Jmoudiak M, Futerman AH. Gaucher disease: pathological mechanisms and modern management. Br J Haematol 2005; 129:178.
  35. Giraldo P, Cenarro A, Alfonso P, et al. Chitotriosidase genotype and plasma activity in patients type 1 Gaucher's disease and their relatives (carriers and non carriers). Haematologica 2001; 86:977.
  36. Hollak CE, Maas M, Aerts JM. Clinically relevant therapeutic endpoints in type I Gaucher disease. J Inherit Metab Dis 2001; 24 Suppl 2:97.
  37. Lacerda L, Arosa FA, Lacerda R, et al. T cell numbers relate to bone involvement in Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 1999; 25:130.
  38. Stein P, Yang R, Liu J, et al. Evaluation of high density lipoprotein as a circulating biomarker of Gaucher disease activity. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011; 34:429.
  39. Rolfs A, Giese AK, Grittner U, et al. Glucosylsphingosine is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for primary diagnostic and follow-up monitoring in Gaucher disease in a non-Jewish, Caucasian cohort of Gaucher disease patients. PLoS One 2013; 8:e79732.
  40. Arkadir D, Dinur T, Revel-Vilk S, et al. Glucosylsphingosine is a reliable response biomarker in Gaucher disease. Am J Hematol 2018; 93:E140.
  41. Revel-Vilk S, Fuller M, Zimran A. Value of Glucosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb1) as a Biomarker in Gaucher Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21.
  42. Czartoryska B, Tylki-Szymańska A, Lugowska A. Changes in serum chitotriosidase activity with cessation of replacement enzyme (cerebrosidase) administration in Gaucher disease. Clin Biochem 2000; 33:147.
  43. Stiles AR, Huggins E, Fierro L, et al. The role of glucosylsphingosine as an early indicator of disease progression in early symptomatic type 1 Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab Rep 2021; 27:100729.
  44. Gayed MM, Jung SH, Huggins E, et al. Glucosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb1): An Informative Biomarker in the Clinical Monitoring of Patients with Gaucher Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23.
  45. Dubiela P, Szymanska-Rozek P, Hasinski P, et al. Long- and Short-Term Glucosphingosine (lyso-Gb1) Dynamics in Gaucher Patients Undergoing Enzyme Replacement Therapy. Biomolecules 2024; 14.
  46. Hollak CE, van Weely S, van Oers MH, Aerts JM. Marked elevation of plasma chitotriosidase activity. A novel hallmark of Gaucher disease. J Clin Invest 1994; 93:1288.
  47. Cox TM, Aerts JM, Belmatoug N, et al. Management of non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease with special reference to pregnancy, splenectomy, bisphosphonate therapy, use of biomarkers and bone disease monitoring. J Inherit Metab Dis 2008; 31:319.
  48. Moran MT, Schofield JP, Hayman AR, et al. Pathologic gene expression in Gaucher disease: up-regulation of cysteine proteinases including osteoclastic cathepsin K. Blood 2000; 96:1969.
  49. Boot RG, Verhoek M, de Fost M, et al. Marked elevation of the chemokine CCL18/PARC in Gaucher disease: a novel surrogate marker for assessing therapeutic intervention. Blood 2004; 103:33.
  50. Deegan PB, Moran MT, McFarlane I, et al. Clinical evaluation of chemokine and enzymatic biomarkers of Gaucher disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2005; 35:259.
  51. Deegan PB, Pavlova E, Tindall J, et al. Osseous manifestations of adult Gaucher disease in the era of enzyme replacement therapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2011; 90:52.
  52. Vellodi A, Foo Y, Cole TJ. Evaluation of three biochemical markers in the monitoring of Gaucher disease. J Inherit Metab Dis 2005; 28:585.
  53. Stein P, Malhotra A, Haims A, et al. Focal splenic lesions in type I Gaucher disease are associated with poor platelet and splenic response to macrophage-targeted enzyme replacement therapy. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010; 33:769.
  54. Patlas M, Hadas-Halpern I, Abrahamov A, et al. Spectrum of abdominal sonographic findings in 103 pediatric patients with Gaucher disease. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:397.
  55. Grabowski GA. Recent clinical progress in Gaucher disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 2005; 17:519.
  56. Azuri I, Wattad A, Peri-Hanania K, et al. A Deep-Learning Approach to Spleen Volume Estimation in Patients with Gaucher Disease. J Clin Med 2023; 12.
  57. Maas M, van Kuijk C, Stoker J, et al. Quantification of bone involvement in Gaucher disease: MR imaging bone marrow burden score as an alternative to Dixon quantitative chemical shift MR imaging--initial experience. Radiology 2003; 229:554.
  58. Allison JW, James CA, Arnold GL, et al. Reconversion of bone marrow in Gaucher disease treated with enzyme therapy documented by MR. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28:237.
  59. Poll LW, Willers R, Häussinger D, et al. [MRI bone marrow findings in 63 patients with type I Gaucher disease]. Rofo 2010; 182:979.
  60. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1976.
  61. Bembi B, Ciana G, Mengel E, et al. Bone complications in children with Gaucher disease. Br J Radiol 2002; 75 Suppl 1:A37.
  62. D'Amore S, Sano H, Chappell DDG, et al. Radiographic Cortical Thickness Index Predicts Fragility Fracture in Gaucher Disease. Radiology 2023; 307:e212779.
  63. Maas M, Poll LW, Terk MR. Imaging and quantifying skeletal involvement in Gaucher disease. Br J Radiol 2002; 75 Suppl 1:A13.
  64. Poll LW, Maas M, Terk MR, et al. Response of Gaucher bone disease to enzyme replacement therapy. Br J Radiol 2002; 75 Suppl 1:A25.
  65. Crabtree NJ, Kibirige MS, Fordham JN, et al. The relationship between lean body mass and bone mineral content in paediatric health and disease. Bone 2004; 35:965.
  66. Dinur T, Zimran A, Becker-Cohen M, et al. Long Term Follow-Up of 103 Untreated Adult Patients with Type 1 Gaucher Disease. J Clin Med 2019; 8.
  67. Basiri M, Ghaffari ME, Ruan J, et al. Osteonecrosis in Gaucher disease in the era of multiple therapies: Biomarker set for risk stratification from a tertiary referral center. Elife 2023; 12.
  68. Hoffman GM, Nowakowski R, Troshynski TJ, et al. Risk reduction in pediatric procedural sedation by application of an American Academy of Pediatrics/American Society of Anesthesiologists process model. Pediatrics 2002; 109:236.
  69. Whitfield PD, Nelson P, Sharp PC, et al. Correlation among genotype, phenotype, and biochemical markers in Gaucher disease: implications for the prediction of disease severity. Mol Genet Metab 2002; 75:46.
  70. Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, et al. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 2001; 93:173.
  71. Elstein D, Belmatoug N, Deegan P, et al. Development and validation of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1)-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical monitoring and for clinical trials. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:9.
  72. Narita A, Koto Y, Noto S, et al. Development and evaluation of a patient-reported outcome measure specific for Gaucher disease with or without neurological symptoms in Japan. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:11.
  73. Charrow J, Esplin JA, Gribble TJ, et al. Gaucher disease: recommendations on diagnosis, evaluation, and monitoring. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:1754.
  74. Harris CM, Taylor DS, Vellodi A. Ocular motor abnormalities in Gaucher disease. Neuropediatrics 1999; 30:289.
  75. Davies EH, Mengel E, Tylki-Szymanska A, et al. Four-year follow-up of chronic neuronopathic Gaucher disease in Europeans using a modified severity scoring tool. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011; 34:1053.
  76. Goker-Alpan O, Ivanova MM. Neuronopathic Gaucher disease: Rare in the West, common in the East. J Inherit Metab Dis 2024; 47:917.
  77. Revel-Vilk S, Szer J, Zimran A. Hematological manifestations and complications of Gaucher disease. Expert Rev Hematol 2021; 14:347.
  78. Weinreb NJ, Cappellini MD, Cox TM, et al. A validated disease severity scoring system for adults with type 1 Gaucher disease. Genet Med 2010; 12:44.
  79. Di Rocco M, Giona F, Carubbi F, et al. A new severity score index for phenotypic classification and evaluation of responses to treatment in type I Gaucher disease. Haematologica 2008; 93:1211.
  80. Gielchinsky Y, Elstein D, Green R, et al. High prevalence of low serum vitamin B12 in a multi-ethnic Israeli population. Br J Haematol 2001; 115:707.
  81. Billett HH, Rizvi S, Sawitsky A. Coagulation abnormalities in patients with Gaucher's disease: effect of therapy. Am J Hematol 1996; 51:234.
  82. Seligsohn U, Zitman D, Many A, Klibansky C. Coexistence of factor XI (plasma thromboplastin antecedent) deficiency and Gaucher's disease. Isr J Med Sci 1976; 12:1448.
  83. Carubbi F, Cappellini MD, Fargion S, et al. Liver involvement in Gaucher disease: A practical review for the hepatologist and the gastroenterologist. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:368.
  84. Lachmann RH, Wight DG, Lomas DJ, et al. Massive hepatic fibrosis in Gaucher's disease: clinico-pathological and radiological features. QJM 2000; 93:237.
  85. Bohte AE, van Dussen L, Akkerman EM, et al. Liver fibrosis in type I Gaucher disease: magnetic resonance imaging, transient elastography and parameters of iron storage. PLoS One 2013; 8:e57507.
  86. Rosenbloom BE, Weinreb NJ, Zimran A, et al. Gaucher disease and cancer incidence: a study from the Gaucher Registry. Blood 2005; 105:4569.
  87. Rosenbloom BE, Cappellini MD, Weinreb NJ, et al. Cancer risk and gammopathies in 2123 adults with Gaucher disease type 1 in the International Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry. Am J Hematol 2022; 97:1337.
  88. Hughes D, Mikosch P, Belmatoug N, et al. Gaucher Disease in Bone: From Pathophysiology to Practice. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34:996.
  89. Mariani G, Erba PA. Radionuclide evaluation of Gaucher disease. In: Gaucher disease, Futerman AH, Zimran A (Eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton 2006. p.287.
  90. Erba PA, Minichilli F, Giona F, et al. 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy to monitor the long-term efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy on bone marrow infiltration in patients with Gaucher disease. J Nucl Med 2013; 54:1717.
  91. Maas M, Hollak CE, Akkerman EM, et al. Quantification of skeletal involvement in adults with type I Gaucher's disease: fat fraction measured by Dixon quantitative chemical shift imaging as a valid parameter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:961.
  92. Kauli R, Zaizov R, Lazar L, et al. Delayed growth and puberty in patients with Gaucher disease type 1: natural history and effect of splenectomy and/or enzyme replacement therapy. Isr Med Assoc J 2000; 2:158.
  93. Pastores GM, Wallenstein S, Desnick RJ, Luckey MM. Bone density in Type 1 Gaucher disease. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11:1801.
  94. Lachmann RH, Grant IR, Halsall D, Cox TM. Twin pairs showing discordance of phenotype in adult Gaucher's disease. QJM 2004; 97:199.
  95. Biegstraaten M, van Schaik IN, Aerts JM, et al. A monozygotic twin pair with highly discordant Gaucher phenotypes. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2011; 46:39.
  96. Maaswinkel-Mooij P, Hollak C, van Eysden-Plaisier M, et al. The natural course of Gaucher disease in The Netherlands: implications for monitoring of disease manifestations. J Inherit Metab Dis 2000; 23:77.
  97. Barney AM, Danda S, Abraham A, et al. Clinicogenetic Profile, Treatment Modalities, and Mortality Predictors of Gaucher Disease: A 15-Year Retrospective Study. Public Health Genomics 2021; 24:139.
  98. Piran S, Roberts A, Patterson MA, Amato D. The clinical course of untreated Gaucher disease in 22 patients over 10 years: hematological and skeletal manifestations. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2009; 43:289.
  99. Boomsma JM, van Dussen L, Wiersma MG, et al. Spontaneous regression of disease manifestations can occur in type 1 Gaucher disease; results of a retrospective cohort study. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2010; 44:181.
  100. Weinreb NJ, Deegan P, Kacena KA, et al. Life expectancy in Gaucher disease type 1. Am J Hematol 2008; 83:896.
  101. Lee RE. The pathology of Gaucher disease. In: Gaucher disease: A century of delineation and research, Desnick RJ, Gatt S, Grabowski GA (Eds), Alan R. Liss, New York 1982. p.177.
  102. D'Amore S, Page K, Donald A, et al. In-depth phenotyping for clinical stratification of Gaucher disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021; 16:431.
  103. Ryan E, Jong T, Sidransky E. Newborn screening in Gaucher disease: A bright and complicated future. OBM Genetics 2022; 6:165.
  104. Elstein D, Altarescu G, Abrahamov A, Zimran A. Children with type 1 Gaucher disease: Changing profiles in the 21st century. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2018; 68:93.
  105. Yang AC, Bier L, Overbey JR, et al. Early manifestations of type 1 Gaucher disease in presymptomatic children diagnosed after parental carrier screening. Genet Med 2017; 19:652.
  106. Shiran A, Brenner B, Laor A, Tatarsky I. Increased risk of cancer in patients with Gaucher disease. Cancer 1993; 72:219.
  107. Arends M, van Dussen L, Biegstraaten M, Hollak CE. Malignancies and monoclonal gammopathy in Gaucher disease; a systematic review of the literature. Br J Haematol 2013; 161:832.
  108. Mignot C, Doummar D, Maire I, et al. Type 2 Gaucher disease: 15 new cases and review of the literature. Brain Dev 2006; 28:39.
  109. Roshan Lal T, Seehra GK, Steward AM, et al. The natural history of type 2 Gaucher disease in the 21st century: A retrospective study. Neurology 2020; 95:e2119.
  110. Weiss K, Gonzalez A, Lopez G, et al. The clinical management of Type 2 Gaucher disease. Mol Genet Metab 2015; 114:110.
  111. Meijon-Ortigueira MDM, Solares I, Muñoz-Delgado C, et al. Women with Gaucher Disease. Biomedicines 2024; 12.
  112. Zimran A, Morris E, Mengel E, et al. The female Gaucher patient: the impact of enzyme replacement therapy around key reproductive events (menstruation, pregnancy and menopause). Blood Cells Mol Dis 2009; 43:264.
  113. Granovsky-Grisaru S, Belmatoug N, vom Dahl S, et al. The management of pregnancy in Gaucher disease. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156:3.
  114. Elstein Y, Eisenberg V, Granovsky-Grisaru S, et al. Pregnancies in Gaucher disease: a 5-year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:435.
Topic 2921 Version 27.0

References