ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : -54 مورد

Intravascular catheter-related infection: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and microbiology

Intravascular catheter-related infection: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and microbiology
Author:
Jesse T Jacob, MD
Section Editors:
Anthony Harris, MD, MPH
Denis Spelman, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA, MPH
Deputy Editor:
Keri K Hall, MD, MS
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: Nov 22, 2024.

INTRODUCTION — 

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) occur in association with peripheral intravascular (IV) catheters and central venous catheters (CVCs) [1]. CVCs are increasingly used in the inpatient and outpatient setting to provide long-term venous access. Bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with such catheters are often classified using the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance definition of central line-associated BSIs (CLABSIs) [2]. It is estimated that approximately 90 percent of CRBSIs in the United States occur with CVCs, though the role of peripheral IVs as causes of BSI is likely underestimated [1,3,4].

The epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and microbiology of IV catheter infections will be reviewed here. The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CVC-associated infections are discussed separately. (See "Intravascular non-hemodialysis catheter-related infection: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and "Intravascular non-hemodialysis catheter-related infection: Treatment" and "Routine care and maintenance of intravenous devices".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — 

In 2022, there were 23,389 central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) reported by 3728 United States acute care hospitals to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). The overall standardized infection ratio (SIR) is 0.84, representing a 16 percent decline compared with 2015 [5]. The SIR was higher in intensive care units (ICUs) than hospital wards (0.96 versus 0.78).

CLABSIs are an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, although they may be decreasing in incidence in some areas, possibly as a result of widespread prevention efforts. As an example, the incidence of CLABSI associated with central lines among patients hospitalized in ICUs in the United States decreased from 3.64 to 1.65 infections per 1000 central line-days between 2001 and 2009 [6,7]. These decreases in the United States continued through 2015 and appear to be sustained [8,9], though the metric has switched from a rate to a SIR, and an increase in SIR was observed through the second year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [10]. Higher CLABSI rates in ICUs were observed in 45 countries from 2015 to 2020, with a pooled mean of 4.55 infections per 1000 central line-days and with the highest rates observed in trauma ICUs and in low to middle income countries [11].

Although ICU patients are generally exposed to more medical devices and are more acutely ill than other hospitalized patients, CLABSIs remain common in hospital wards outside the ICU. As an example, among 23,389 CLABSIs reported to the CDC's NHSN, 9666 occurred among patients in adult ICUs, 12,449 in inpatient wards, and 1274 in neonatal ICUs in the United States in 2022 [12].

In a prospective analysis from the Surveillance and Control of Pathogens of Epidemiologic Importance database, which evaluated the characteristics of 24,179 hospital-onset bloodstream infections (BSIs) from 49 hospitals in the United States between 1995 and 2002, the following findings were noted [13]:

●The incidence of hospital-onset BSI was 60 cases per 10,000 hospital admissions. Approximately 15 percent of cases occurred in children.

●Approximately 51 percent of cases occurred in the ICU.

●Intravascular (IV) devices were the most common predisposing factor. A central venous catheter was in place in 72 percent, peripheral intravenous catheter in 35 percent, and an arterial catheter in 16 percent. (See 'Catheter factors' below.)

●The mean time from admission to BSI onset ranged from 12 to 26 days and depended on the isolated pathogen.

●The crude mortality rate was 27 percent.

Indwelling catheters are also a frequent source of infection in many populations who required long-term venous access, including hemodialysis and oncology patients, as well as those receiving total parenteral nutrition. In 2008 in the United States, an estimated 37,000 catheter-related BSIs (CRBSIs) occurred among patients receiving outpatient hemodialysis [6]. (See "Central venous catheters for acute and chronic hemodialysis access and their management" and "Tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI): Management and prevention" and "Central venous catheters: Overview of complications and prevention in adults", section on 'Catheter-related infection'.)

BSIs associated with the widespread use of indwelling catheters have possibly contributed to the changing epidemiology of other infections. As an example, Staphylococcus aureus has emerged as a leading microbial cause of infective endocarditis in tertiary care centers, as illustrated by a study of a large international cohort of patients with both native and prosthetic valve endocarditis [14]. Infection with S. aureus versus other pathogens was independently associated with the presumed presence of an IV device. (See "Native valve endocarditis: Epidemiology, risk factors, and microbiology", section on 'Microbiology'.)

The distribution of pathogens associated with CRBSI is described below. (See 'Microbiology' below.)

RISK FACTORS

Host factors — Host factors commonly associated with hospital-onset bloodstream infections (BSIs) include the following [15,16]:

●Extremes of age

●Previous BSI

●Malnutrition

●Total parenteral nutrition administration

●Chronic illness

●Immune deficiency (especially neutropenia)

●Bone marrow transplantation

●Loss of skin integrity (as with burns)

Neutropenic patients are also at high risk for infections, including catheter-related BSIs (CRBSIs). Those with an absolute neutrophil count (bands plus polymorphonuclear leukocytes) <100 cells/microL appear to be at the greatest risk [17]. Hematologic malignancies have been associated more highly with central line-associated BSIs (CLABSIs) than solid tumors [18].

Among pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients, underlying gastrointestinal and oncologic diagnoses have also been associated with increased risk for CLABSI [19].

Patients hospitalized with burns are at particularly increased risk for hospital-onset BSIs as the necrotic tissue in the burn wounds increases the susceptibility to infection, thermal trauma decreases host resistance, and the body exhibits an inflammatory reaction to these processes [20].

Infection with COVID-19 has been shown in some studies to be associated with increased risk for CLABSI [21], including in national surveillance in the United States, which was initially associated with disruptions to routine infection prevention activities [22].

Catheter factors — All intravascular (IV) devices confer a risk of infection, although some (eg, nontunneled central venous catheters [CVCs]) carry greater risk than others (eg, peripheral venous catheters) [23].

For CVCs, the site of catheter placement affects the risk of infection, with the subclavian site being associated in some studies with less risk than other sites and therefore being the preferred insertion site in ICU patients [24,25]. Peripheral IV placement in the hand may be associated with lower risk of BSI compared with more proximal sites [26]. (See "Central venous catheters: Overview of complications and prevention in adults", section on 'Incidence by type of catheter' and "Central venous access: Device and site selection in adults", section on 'Factors influencing catheter selection' and "Central venous access: Device and site selection in adults", section on 'Anatomic location' and "Central venous access: Device and site selection in adults", section on 'Benefits/risk for specific sites'.)

Other than the type and location of the catheter, the most important extrinsic risk factors associated with the development of CRBSIs include:

●Duration of catheterization (although there is no indication for routine line changing based on number of catheter days)

●Type of catheter material

●Conditions of insertion

●Catheter-site care

●Skill of the catheter inserter

The importance of these factors varies with the site and type of IV catheter (table 1). In general, the risk of CLABSI is comparatively elevated in the following circumstances:

●Femoral or internal jugular placement compared with subclavian placement [27-30]

●Use for hyperalimentation or hemodialysis compared with other indications [15,31]

●Submaximal compared with maximal (mask, cap, sterile gloves, gown, large drape) barrier precautions during insertion [32,33]

●Nontunneled compared with tunneled insertion [34,35]

●Tunneled insertion compared with a totally implantable device [36-38]

●Bare compared with antibiotic-impregnated catheter [39]

●Multiple-lumen compared with single-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) [40]

Other factors that may increase the risk of infection include thrombosis of the catheter, repeated catheterization, increased manipulation of the catheter (including catheter repair), presence of infectious foci elsewhere, and disparities in the care of underrepresented groups [27,28,41-44]. A meta-analysis found that chemotherapy and immunosuppression were additional risk factors for CLABSI [45]. The use of antiseptic barrier caps for CVCs, CLABSI bundles, and blood diversion devices has been associated with reductions in CLABSI [46-48].

The incidence of BSI associated with peripheral venous catheters is low (0.04 per 1000 catheter days), but as over two billion peripheral IVs are estimated to be used worldwide every year, the absolute number of infections is high [49]. It has been estimated that one in three health care-associated S. aureus CRBSIs are due to peripheral intravenous catheters [3]. In a meta-analysis including more than 57,000 patients in 23 studies, PICCs were associated with a lower risk of BSI than CVCs (relative risk 0.62, 95% CI 0.4-0.94); however, among studies that reported BSIs per catheter day, PICC-related infection occurred as often as CVC infection (incidence rate ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.46-1.79) [50]. Peripheral IVs with a ≤16 gauge diameter may be associated with a higher risk of BSI [51].

Detailed data describing modifiable catheter risk factors and methods of reducing the risk of infection are discussed elsewhere (see "Central venous access: Device and site selection in adults", section on 'Benefits/risk for specific sites'). Beyond host and catheter risk factors, institutional factors and safety culture may be associated with CLABSI [52].

SOURCES OF INFECTION — 

Bloodstream infection (BSI) associated with central venous catheters (CVCs) can be attributable to four major sources: most often colonization from the skin or intraluminal or hub contamination, less often secondary seeding from a BSI, and, rarely, contamination of the infusate (figure 1) [53].

Skin colonization — The most common source of CVC-related infections is colonization of the intracutaneous and intravascular (IV) portions of the catheter by microorganisms from the patient's skin and occasionally the hands of health care workers (on insertion or as a result of manipulation) [54-56]. Furthermore, a number of studies have found a strong correlation between heavy skin colonization and both catheter colonization and subsequent catheter-related infection, especially with short-term IV devices [55,57-59]. Microorganisms gain access to the catheter wound and migrate along the catheter-subcutaneous tract into the fibrin sheath that surrounds IV catheters. Scanning electron micrographs reveal that both the external and internal surfaces of catheters can become colonized with microorganisms [60].

The deposition of biofilm on the external and internal surface of vascular catheters is thought to play an important role in the colonization process. The biofilm is produced by a combination of host factors (eg, fibrinogen and fibrin) and microbial products (eg, glycocalyx or "slime").

Thus, it is not surprising that common skin commensals, such as S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, are often isolated from colonized catheters and patients with primary BSIs. (See 'Microbiology' below.)

Intraluminal contamination — Intraluminal and/or hub contamination is an important source of BSI in patients with centrally inserted CVCs that are in place for more than two weeks or in patients with a surgically implanted device [61-64]. In one report in neonates, for example, catheter-related sepsis occurred with 26 percent of 113 catheters [64]. The infecting organism was grown from the catheter hub before or at the time of diagnosis of bacteremia in 54 percent of cases. A study from Spain found that a hub chamber containing iodinated alcohol significantly reduced both colonization and BSIs related to CVCs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients [65]. (See "Central venous access: Device and site selection in adults", section on 'Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters'.)

Hematogenous seeding — Hematogenous seeding of the device can occur during a BSI originating from another focus of infection, often from a gastrointestinal site; this is most likely to occur in critically ill patients or those with long-term catheters [27,57]. Recurrent bacteremia from the catheter may be difficult to distinguish from worsening of the primary focus of infection; removal of the catheter may help distinguish between these possibilities.

Infusate contamination — Administration of contaminated infusate or additives, such as a contaminated heparin flush, can result in a BSI. Organisms may contaminate infusate by several mechanisms: during manufacture, during solution preparation, via retrograde contamination from a contaminated catheter, or handling by health care workers. This is now a rare source of BSI and generally causes epidemic infections [66-70]. Use of diluted chlorhexidine via contaminated atomizers for cutaneous disinfection has similarly been associated with at least two outbreaks of BSIs and should be avoided [71].

Particular features can suggest the diagnosis. Infusate-related infections should be suspected when sepsis occurs in an otherwise low-risk patient receiving an intravenous solution or when there is a cluster of primary BSIs with an unusual organism, often an uncommon gram-negative bacillus. The infection is confirmed by the isolation of the same organism from both the infusate and percutaneous blood culture.

MICROBIOLOGY

General principles — Prior to the 1980s, gram-negative aerobes were the predominant organisms associated with hospital-onset bloodstream infections (BSIs). Since then, gram-positive aerobes (eg, coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus, and Enterococcus) and Candida species have increased in relative importance [13,72].

As an example, the following distribution of pathogens was noted in the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) between 2011 and 2014 [73]:

●Coagulase-negative staphylococci – 16.4 percent

●S. aureus – 13.2 percent

●Enterococci – 15.2 percent

●Candida species – 13.3 percent

●Klebsiella species – 8.4 percent

●Escherichia coli – 5.4 percent

●Enterobacter species – 4.4 percent

●Pseudomonas species – 4 percent

Subsequent surveillance reports in the United States and Europe have documented similar microbiologic distributions, with coagulase-negative staphylococci, S. aureus, enterococci, and Candida spp accounting for the majority of catheter-related BSIs (CRBSIs) [74-76] and a trend toward more antimicrobial resistance among the pathogens [73]. The predominance of staphylococcal species, which are common constituents of the skin microbiome, reflects the observation that central venous catheter (CVC) infections are most commonly attributable to the patient's skin microbiome [77]. Besides staphylococci, enterococci, Candida spp, and Klebsiella spp are increasingly recognized as BSI pathogens in NHSN reports [78], with Pseudomonas spp, Acinetobacter spp, and more resistant organisms being important pathogens in intensive care unit (ICU)-onset infections [79].

A report from the CDC's NHSN from 2011 to 2017 demonstrated some changes in trends in the pathogens associated with 136,264 central line-associated BSIs (CLABSIs) [80]. Enterobacterales was the most commonly reported pathogen group in all sites except adult ICUs, for which the most commonly reported pathogen group was Candida spp. This analysis highlights the important role of Enterobacterales in CRBSIs.

Gram-negative bacilli may account from 16-31 percent of CLABSIs [13,73]. The most commonly isolated organisms include E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas species, Enterobacter species, Serratia species, and Acinetobacter species. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia is a particular problem in cancer patients and is commonly CVC related [81]. A cluster of cases of catheter-related infections with gram-negative bacilli should prompt suspicion of an infusate contamination. (See 'Infusate contamination' above.)

BSIs caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli have become a major concern because of increased rates of treatment failure and death. (See "Gram-negative bacillary bacteremia in adults", section on 'Antibiotic resistance'.)

Fungi, especially Candida species, account for up to 27 percent of CLABSIs [13,78,80]. Fungal infections are a particular concern in patients receiving a high concentration of glucose in intravenous hyperalimentation. Candida species also produce glycocalyx, which enhances their ability to colonize CVCs. Candida infections with CVCs occur more frequently in immunosuppressed patients and in patients who have received multiple antibacterial antibiotics [82]. Issues related to candidemia are discussed further separately. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults" and "Management of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults".)

BSI related to CVCs occasionally may be due to more than one microorganism [77]. CVC-related infection due to anaerobic bacteria is exceedingly rare.

Special populations — Certain patient populations have a different epidemiology of BSI with regard to microbial etiology:

●Among burn patients, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most frequently isolated gram-negative pathogen and, in one series, accounted for 16 percent of all cases of BSI [83]. In a prospective study of 45 bacteremic burn patients in India, Pseudomonas species were the most common isolates, responsible for 42 percent of cases [84].

●In patients with hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies, gram-negative pathogens predominate [85]. This association may be due to the translocation of gut bacteria in patients with altered mucosal barriers, and thus, the contribution of the catheter to the infection may be debatable [86].

●In hemodialysis patients, gram-positive organisms reflecting skin microbiome are responsible for most catheter-related infections. (See "Central venous catheters for acute and chronic hemodialysis access and their management" and "Tunneled hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI): Management and prevention".)

●In infections associated with needleless access devices, hydrophilic gram-negative pathogens such as Pseudomonas species, Klebsiella species, Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) species, Acinetobacter species, and Serratia marcescens appear to be the most frequently isolated pathogens [87-89]. It is thought that the devices are exposed to these pathogens during patient bathing or showering.

●In the ambulatory setting, children younger than three years or without recent hospitalization (within the week prior to presentation) may have an increased likelihood of polymicrobial CLABSIs [90].

●In patients, particularly very young infants, receiving intravenous lipids, Malassezia furfur, a lipophilic yeast, has been identified as a cause of BSIs [91].

●In patients receiving a high concentration of glucose in intravenous hyperalimentation, fungal infections, and Candida species in particular, are a particular concern.

Infusate contamination — BSIs related to infusion of contaminated fluids generally involve gram-negative bacilli, including Klebsiella, Citrobacter, or non-aeruginosa Pseudomonas species. Enterobacteriaceae, specifically, are usually associated with contaminated glucose-containing infusates. Fungi, especially Candida parapsilosis, are often associated with contaminated hypertonic parenteral nutrition infusate [53]. A cluster of cases of BSI involving the same gram-negative or fungal organism should prompt an investigation into the possibility of contaminated infusate. (See 'Infusate contamination' above.)

Local infection — Infections of the insertion or exit site, pocket, or tunnel are generally due to the same organisms listed above (see 'Microbiology' above). S. aureus and P. aeruginosa may be isolated in a greater proportion of these local infections than in CLABSIs.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — 

UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

●Basics topic (see "Patient education: Central line infection (The Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

●Epidemiology – Approximately half of hospital-onset bloodstream infections (BSIs) occur in intensive care units (ICUs), and the majority are associated with the presence of an intravascular (IV) device. Catheter-related BSIs (CRBSIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, including resource-limited settings. (See 'Introduction' above and 'Epidemiology' above.)

●Host-related risk factors – Hospitalized patients with burns or neutropenia are at particularly increased risk for hospital-onset BSIs. Other host risk factors include extremes of age, immune deficiencies in general, chronic illness, and malnutrition. (See 'Host factors' above.)

●Catheter-related risk factors – All types of IV catheters pose significant but varying risk of infection. Duration of catheterization, catheter material, insertion conditions, and site care also impact the risk of catheter-associated infections (table 1). (See 'Catheter factors' above.)

●Sources of infection – BSI associated with central venous catheters can be attributed to four major sources: colonization from the skin, intraluminal or hub contamination, secondary seeding from a BSI, and contamination of the infusate (figure 1). Infections related to the administration of contaminated intravenous fluids are rare but should be suspected when bacteremia occurs in an otherwise low-risk patient or when there is a cluster of BSIs with unusual organisms. (See 'Sources of infection' above.)

●Microbiology – The skin microbiome is an important source of IV catheter infection. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus, common skin commensals, are common isolates from hospital-onset BSIs. Candida spp are the most frequent pathogen for central line-associated BSIs in adult ICUs. Gram-negative pathogens are increasing in frequency and predominate in patients with hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies. Infections with multidrug-resistant organisms are associated with high rates of treatment failure and death. (See 'Microbiology' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — 

The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Jeffrey Band, MD, FACP, FIDSA, and Robert Gaynes, MD, who contributed to earlier versions of this topic review.

  1. Mayer J, Greene T, Howell J, et al. Agreement in classifying bloodstream infections among multiple reviewers conducting surveillance. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:364.
  2. National Healthcare Safety Network: Bloodstream Infection Event (Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection and Non-central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection). https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/4psc_clabscurrent.pdf (Accessed on May 11, 2022).
  3. Mermel LA. Short-term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:1757.
  4. Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:391.
  5. Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://arpsp.cdc.gov/profile/nhsn/clabsi (Accessed on August 07, 2024).
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60:243.
  7. Fagan RP, Edwards JR, Park BJ, et al. Incidence trends in pathogen-specific central line-associated bloodstream infections in US intensive care units, 1990-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 34:893.
  8. Pronovost PJ, Watson SR, Goeschel CA, et al. Sustaining Reductions in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Michigan Intensive Care Units: A 10-Year Analysis. Am J Med Qual 2016; 31:197.
  9. Dudeck MA, Edwards JR, Allen-Bridson K, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network report, data summary for 2013, Device-associated Module. Am J Infect Control 2015; 43:206.
  10. Lastinger LM, Alvarez CR, Kofman A, et al. Continued increases in the incidence of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) during the second year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:997.
  11. Rosenthal VD, Yin R, Nercelles P, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report of health care associated infections, data summary of 45 countries for 2015 to 2020, adult and pediatric units, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2024; 52:1002.
  12. Current HAI Progress Report | 2022 National and State Healthcare-Associated Infections Progress Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2024. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associated-infections/php/data/progress-report.html (Accessed on August 07, 2024).
  13. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:309.
  14. Fowler VG Jr, Miro JM, Hoen B, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA 2005; 293:3012.
  15. Tokars JI, Cookson ST, McArthur MA, et al. Prospective evaluation of risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients receiving home infusion therapy. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131:340.
  16. Reunes S, Rombaut V, Vogelaers D, et al. Risk factors and mortality for nosocomial bloodstream infections in elderly patients. Eur J Intern Med 2011; 22:e39.
  17. Bodey GP, Buckley M, Sathe YS, Freireich EJ. Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med 1966; 64:328.
  18. Mollee P, Jones M, Stackelroth J, et al. Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect 2011; 78:26.
  19. Niedner MF, Huskins WC, Colantuoni E, et al. Epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infections in the pediatric intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32:1200.
  20. Tompkins RG, Burke JF. Infections of burn wounds. In: Hospital Infections, 3rd Ed, Bennett JV, Brachman PS (Eds), Little, Brown, Boston 1992.
  21. Shukla BS, Warde PR, Knott E, et al. Bloodstream Infection Risk, Incidence, and Deaths for Hospitalized Patients during Coronavirus Disease Pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 27:2588.
  22. Rosenthal VD, Myatra SN, Divatia JV, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on health care-associated infections in intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 118:83.
  23. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81:1159.
  24. Parienti JJ, du Cheyron D, Timsit JF, et al. Meta-analysis of subclavian insertion and nontunneled central venous catheter-associated infection risk reduction in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1627.
  25. Buetti N, Marschall J, Drees M, et al. Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022; 43:553.
  26. Buetti N, Abbas M, Pittet D, et al. Lower risk of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by hand insertion. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022; 11:80.
  27. Mermel LA, McCormick RD, Springman SR, Maki DG. The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. Am J Med 1991; 91:197S.
  28. Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G, et al. Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:2520.
  29. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 286:700.
  30. Ronco C. The place of early haemoperfusion with polymyxin B fibre column in the treatment of sepsis. Crit Care 2005; 9:631.
  31. Wilcox TA. Catheter-related bloodstream infections. Semin Intervent Radiol 2009; 26:139.
  32. Raad II, Hohn DC, Gilbreath BJ, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15:231.
  33. Maki DG. Yes, Virginia, aseptic technique is very important: maximal barrier precautions during insertion reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994; 15:227.
  34. Pessa ME, Howard RJ. Complications of Hickman-Broviac catheters. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1985; 161:257.
  35. Darbyshire PJ, Weightman NC, Speller DC. Problems associated with indwelling central venous catheters. Arch Dis Child 1985; 60:129.
  36. Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT, et al. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:1168.
  37. Ross MN, Haase GM, Poole MA, et al. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988; 167:141.
  38. Carde P, Cosset-Delaigue MF, Laplanche A, Chareau I. Classical external indwelling central venous catheter versus totally implanted venous access systems for chemotherapy administration: a randomized trial in 100 patients with solid tumors. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25:939.
  39. Veenstra DL, Saint S, Saha S, et al. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1999; 281:261.
  40. Lam PW, Volling C, Chan T, et al. Impact of Defaulting to Single-Lumen Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters on Patient Outcomes: An Interrupted Time Series Study. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67:954.
  41. Barzaghi A, Dell'Orto M, Rovelli A, et al. Central venous catheter clots: incidence, clinical significance and catheter care in patients with hematologic malignancies. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1995; 12:243.
  42. Lundgren IS, Zhou C, Malone FR, et al. Central venous catheter repair is associated with an increased risk of bacteremia and central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric patients. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2012; 31:337.
  43. Gettler EB, Kalu IC, Okeke NL, et al. Disparities in central line-associated bloodstream infection and catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates: An exploratory analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:1857.
  44. McGrath CL, Bettinger B, Stimpson M, et al. Identifying and Mitigating Disparities in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Minoritized Racial, Ethnic, and Language Groups. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:700.
  45. Lafuente Cabrero E, Terradas Robledo R, Civit Cuñado A, et al. Risk factors of catheter- associated bloodstream infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282290.
  46. Tejada S, Leal-Dos-Santos M, Peña-López Y, et al. Antiseptic barrier caps in central line-associated bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med 2022; 99:70.
  47. Devrim I, Erdem H, El-Kholy A, et al. Analyzing central-line associated bloodstream infection prevention bundles in 22 countries: The results of ID-IRI survey. Am J Infect Control 2022; 50:1327.
  48. Tompkins LS, Tien V, Madison AN. Getting to zero: Impact of a device to reduce blood culture contamination and false-positive central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:1386.
  49. Marsh N, Larsen EN, Ullman AJ, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter infection and failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 151:104673.
  50. Chopra V, O'Horo JC, Rogers MA, et al. The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 34:908.
  51. Faltoni M, Catho G, Pianca E, et al. Catheter size and risk of short-term peripheral venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: an observational study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024; 30:548.
  52. Nelson EC, Wang CH, Huang G, Kuo NW. Institutional factors associated with the incidence rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection in California community hospitals. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274436.
  53. Maki DG. Infections due to infusion therapy. In: Hospital Infections, 3rd Ed, Bennett JV, Brachman PS (Eds), Little, Brown, Boston 1992. p.849.
  54. Snydman DR, Gorbea HF, Pober BR, et al. Predictive value of surveillance skin cultures in total-parenteral-nutrition-related infection. Lancet 1982; 2:1385.
  55. Bjornson HS, Colley R, Bower RH, et al. Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Surgery 1982; 92:720.
  56. Cooper GL, Hopkins CC. Rapid diagnosis of intravascular catheter-associated infection by direct Gram staining of catheter segments. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:1142.
  57. Raad II, Baba M, Bodey GP. Diagnosis of catheter-related infections: the role of surveillance and targeted quantitative skin cultures. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 20:593.
  58. Guidet B, Nicola I, Barakett V, et al. Skin versus hub cultures to predict colonization and infection of central venous catheter in intensive care patients. Infection 1994; 22:43.
  59. Armstrong CW, Mayhall CG, Miller KB, et al. Clinical predictors of infection of central venous catheters used for total parenteral nutrition. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990; 11:71.
  60. Raad I, Costerton W, Sabharwal U, et al. Ultrastructural analysis of indwelling vascular catheters: a quantitative relationship between luminal colonization and duration of placement. J Infect Dis 1993; 168:400.
  61. Liñares J, Sitges-Serra A, Garau J, et al. Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: a prospective study with quantitative and semiquantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 21:357.
  62. Tenney JH, Moody MR, Newman KA, et al. Adherent microorganisms on lumenal surfaces of long-term intravenous catheters. Importance of Staphylococcus epidermidis in patients with cancer. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:1949.
  63. Miller JJ, Venus B, Mathru M. Comparison of the sterility of long-term central venous catheterization using single lumen, triple lumen, and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care Med 1984; 12:634.
  64. Salzman MB, Isenberg HD, Shapiro JF, et al. A prospective study of the catheter hub as the portal of entry for microorganisms causing catheter-related sepsis in neonates. J Infect Dis 1993; 167:487.
  65. León C, Alvarez-Lerma F, Ruiz-Santana S, et al. Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1318.
  66. Maki DG. Nosocomial bacteremia. An epidemiologic overview. Am J Med 1981; 70:719.
  67. Kimura AC, Calvet H, Higa JI, et al. Outbreak of Ralstonia pickettii bacteremia in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005; 24:1099.
  68. Ostrowsky BE, Whitener C, Bredenberg HK, et al. Serratia marcescens bacteremia traced to an infused narcotic. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1529.
  69. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Pseudomonas bloodstream infections associated with a heparin/saline flush--Missouri, New York, Texas, and Michigan, 2004-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005; 54:269.
  70. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update: Delayed onset Pseudomonas fluorescens bloodstream infections after exposure to contaminated heparin flush--Michigan and South Dakota, 2005-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006; 55:961.
  71. Tena D, Carranza R, Barberá JR, et al. Outbreak of long-term intravascular catheter-related bacteremia due to Achromobacter xylosoxidans subspecies xylosoxidans in a hemodialysis unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2005; 24:727.
  72. Banerjee SN, Emori TG, Culver DH, et al. Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991; 91:86S.
  73. Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, et al. Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 37:1288.
  74. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, et al. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29:996.
  75. ECDC surveillance report: Surveillance of healthcare-associated infections in Europe, 2007. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/120215_SUR_HAI_2007.pdf (Accessed on November 28, 2012).
  76. Ong DS, Bonten MJ, Safdari K, et al. Epidemiology, Management, and Risk-Adjusted Mortality of ICU-Acquired Enterococcal Bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:1413.
  77. Haslett TM, Isenberg HD, Hilton E, et al. Microbiology of indwelling central intravascular catheters. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26:696.
  78. Chitnis AS, Edwards JR, Ricks PM, et al. Device-associated infection rates, device utilization, and antimicrobial resistance in long-term acute care hospitals reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012; 33:993.
  79. Gouel-Cheron A, Swihart BJ, Warner S, et al. Epidemiology of ICU-Onset Bloodstream Infection: Prevalence, Pathogens, and Risk Factors Among 150,948 ICU Patients at 85 U.S. Hospitals. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:1725.
  80. Novosad SA, Fike L, Dudeck MA, et al. Pathogens causing central-line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals-United States, 2011-2017. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020; 41:313.
  81. Boktour M, Hanna H, Ansari S, et al. Central venous catheter and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in cancer patients. Cancer 2006; 106:1967.
  82. Chan S, Baley ED, Hossain J, Di Pentima MC. Candida species bloodstream infections in hospitalised children: A 10-year experience. J Paediatr Child Health 2015; 51:857.
  83. Brusselaers N, Monstrey S, Snoeij T, et al. Morbidity and mortality of bloodstream infections in patients with severe burn injury. Am J Crit Care 2010; 19:e81.
  84. Mir MA, Anjum S, Mir RA, et al. Prevalence of various bacteria and their susceptibility pattern in burn unit of governmental medical college and hospital Srinagar. The Internet Journal of Microbiology 2012; 10:5580.
  85. Nørgaard M, Larsson H, Pedersen G, et al. Short-term mortality of bacteraemia in elderly patients with haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol 2006; 132:25.
  86. Sexton DJ, Chen LF, Anderson DJ. Current definitions of central line-associated bloodstream infection: is the emperor wearing clothes? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010; 31:1286.
  87. Do AN, Ray BJ, Banerjee SN, et al. Bloodstream infection associated with needleless device use and the importance of infection-control practices in the home health care setting. J Infect Dis 1999; 179:442.
  88. Toscano CM, Bell M, Zukerman C, et al. Gram-negative bloodstream infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: the roles of needleless device use, bathing practices, and catheter care. Am J Infect Control 2009; 37:327.
  89. Jarvis WR, Murphy C, Hall KK, et al. Health care-associated bloodstream infections associated with negative- or positive-pressure or displacement mechanical valve needleless connectors. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:1821.
  90. Downes KJ, Metlay JP, Bell LM, et al. Polymicrobial bloodstream infections among children and adolescents with central venous catheters evaluated in ambulatory care. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:387.
  91. Long JG, Keyserling HL. Catheter-related infection in infants due to an unusual lipophilic yeast--Malassezia furfur. Pediatrics 1985; 76:896.
Topic 3806 Version 35.0

References

1 : Agreement in classifying bloodstream infections among multiple reviewers conducting surveillance.

2 : Agreement in classifying bloodstream infections among multiple reviewers conducting surveillance.

3 : Short-term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review.

4 : Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

5 : Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

6 : Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009.

7 : Incidence trends in pathogen-specific central line-associated bloodstream infections in US intensive care units, 1990-2010.

8 : Sustaining Reductions in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Michigan Intensive Care Units: A 10-Year Analysis.

9 : National Healthcare Safety Network report, data summary for 2013, Device-associated Module.

10 : Continued increases in the incidence of healthcare-associated infection (HAI) during the second year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

11 : International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report of health care associated infections, data summary of 45 countries for 2015 to 2020, adult and pediatric units, device-associated module.

12 : International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report of health care associated infections, data summary of 45 countries for 2015 to 2020, adult and pediatric units, device-associated module.

13 : Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study.

14 : Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress.

15 : Prospective evaluation of risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients receiving home infusion therapy.

16 : Risk factors and mortality for nosocomial bloodstream infections in elderly patients.

17 : Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia.

18 : Catheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort study.

19 : Epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infections in the pediatric intensive care unit.

20 : Epidemiology of central line-associated bloodstream infections in the pediatric intensive care unit.

21 : Bloodstream Infection Risk, Incidence, and Deaths for Hospitalized Patients during Coronavirus Disease Pandemic.

22 : The impact of COVID-19 on health care-associated infections in intensive care units in low- and middle-income countries: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings.

23 : The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies.

24 : Meta-analysis of subclavian insertion and nontunneled central venous catheter-associated infection risk reduction in critically ill adults.

25 : Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.

26 : Lower risk of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by hand insertion.

27 : The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping.

28 : Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients.

29 : Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

30 : The place of early haemoperfusion with polymyxin B fibre column in the treatment of sepsis.

31 : Catheter-related bloodstream infections.

32 : Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections by using maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion.

33 : Yes, Virginia, aseptic technique is very important: maximal barrier precautions during insertion reduce the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia.

34 : Complications of Hickman-Broviac catheters.

35 : Problems associated with indwelling central venous catheters.

36 : Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer.

37 : Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.

38 : Classical external indwelling central venous catheter versus totally implanted venous access systems for chemotherapy administration: a randomized trial in 100 patients with solid tumors.

39 : Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis.

40 : Impact of Defaulting to Single-Lumen Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters on Patient Outcomes: An Interrupted Time Series Study.

41 : Central venous catheter clots: incidence, clinical significance and catheter care in patients with hematologic malignancies.

42 : Central venous catheter repair is associated with an increased risk of bacteremia and central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric patients.

43 : Disparities in central line-associated bloodstream infection and catheter-associated urinary tract infection rates: An exploratory analysis.

44 : Identifying and Mitigating Disparities in Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Minoritized Racial, Ethnic, and Language Groups.

45 : Risk factors of catheter- associated bloodstream infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

46 : Antiseptic barrier caps in central line-associated bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

47 : Analyzing central-line associated bloodstream infection prevention bundles in 22 countries: The results of ID-IRI survey.

48 : Getting to zero: Impact of a device to reduce blood culture contamination and false-positive central-line-associated bloodstream infections.

49 : Peripheral intravenous catheter infection and failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

50 : The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

51 : Catheter size and risk of short-term peripheral venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections: an observational study.

52 : Institutional factors associated with the incidence rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection in California community hospitals.

53 : Institutional factors associated with the incidence rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection in California community hospitals.

54 : Predictive value of surveillance skin cultures in total-parenteral-nutrition-related infection.

55 : Association between microorganism growth at the catheter insertion site and colonization of the catheter in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition.

56 : Rapid diagnosis of intravascular catheter-associated infection by direct Gram staining of catheter segments.

57 : Diagnosis of catheter-related infections: the role of surveillance and targeted quantitative skin cultures.

58 : Skin versus hub cultures to predict colonization and infection of central venous catheter in intensive care patients.

59 : Clinical predictors of infection of central venous catheters used for total parenteral nutrition.

60 : Ultrastructural analysis of indwelling vascular catheters: a quantitative relationship between luminal colonization and duration of placement.

61 : Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: a prospective study with quantitative and semiquantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments.

62 : Adherent microorganisms on lumenal surfaces of long-term intravenous catheters. Importance of Staphylococcus epidermidis in patients with cancer.

63 : Comparison of the sterility of long-term central venous catheterization using single lumen, triple lumen, and pulmonary artery catheters.

64 : A prospective study of the catheter hub as the portal of entry for microorganisms causing catheter-related sepsis in neonates.

65 : Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection: a prospective, randomized study.

66 : Nosocomial bacteremia. An epidemiologic overview.

67 : Outbreak of Ralstonia pickettii bacteremia in a neonatal intensive care unit.

68 : Serratia marcescens bacteremia traced to an infused narcotic.

69 : Pseudomonas bloodstream infections associated with a heparin/saline flush--Missouri, New York, Texas, and Michigan, 2004-2005.

70 : Update: Delayed onset Pseudomonas fluorescens bloodstream infections after exposure to contaminated heparin flush--Michigan and South Dakota, 2005-2006.

71 : Outbreak of long-term intravascular catheter-related bacteremia due to Achromobacter xylosoxidans subspecies xylosoxidans in a hemodialysis unit.

72 : Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System.

73 : Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections: Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014.

74 : NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007.

75 : NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007.

76 : Epidemiology, Management, and Risk-Adjusted Mortality of ICU-Acquired Enterococcal Bacteremia.

77 : Microbiology of indwelling central intravascular catheters.

78 : Device-associated infection rates, device utilization, and antimicrobial resistance in long-term acute care hospitals reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2010.

79 : Epidemiology of ICU-Onset Bloodstream Infection: Prevalence, Pathogens, and Risk Factors Among 150,948 ICU Patients at 85 U.S. Hospitals.

80 : Pathogens causing central-line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals-United States, 2011-2017.

81 : Central venous catheter and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in cancer patients.

82 : Candida species bloodstream infections in hospitalised children: A 10-year experience.

83 : Morbidity and mortality of bloodstream infections in patients with severe burn injury.

84 : Prevalence of various bacteria and their susceptibility pattern in burn unit of governmental medical college and hospital Srinagar

85 : Short-term mortality of bacteraemia in elderly patients with haematological malignancies.

86 : Current definitions of central line-associated bloodstream infection: is the emperor wearing clothes?

87 : Bloodstream infection associated with needleless device use and the importance of infection-control practices in the home health care setting.

88 : Gram-negative bloodstream infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: the roles of needleless device use, bathing practices, and catheter care.

89 : Health care-associated bloodstream infections associated with negative- or positive-pressure or displacement mechanical valve needleless connectors.

90 : Polymicrobial bloodstream infections among children and adolescents with central venous catheters evaluated in ambulatory care.

91 : Catheter-related infection in infants due to an unusual lipophilic yeast--Malassezia furfur.