ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Miscarriage rate after amniocentesis in series utilizing ultrasound guidance during the procedure

Miscarriage rate after amniocentesis in series utilizing ultrasound guidance during the procedure
Author Spontaneous abortions Difference in rates (95% CI)
Cases (numbers) Controls (number)
Tabor (1986) 1.7% (38/2242) 0.7% (17/2270) 0.9% (0.3%; 1.5%)
Andreasen (1989) 2.3% (30/1318) 1.4% (4/276) 0.8% (-1.3%; 1.9%)
Tongsong (1998) 1.8% (36/2045) 1.4% (29/2045) 0.3% (-0.4%; 1.1%)
Antsaklis (2000) 2.1% (79/3696) 1.5% (80/5324) 0.6% (0.1%; 1.2%)
Muller (2002) 0.9% (31/3472) 0.4% (197/47,004) 0.5% (0.2%; 0.8%)
Eddleman (2006) 1.0% (31/3096) 0.9% (300/31,907) 0.1% (-0.3%; 0.5%)
Kong (2006) 2.0% (68/3466) 1.2% (13/1125) 0.8% (-0.2%; 1.5%)
Towner (2007) 0.5% (69/15,005) 0.5% (90/17,045) -0.1% (-0.2%; 0.1%)
Pitukkijronnakorn (2011) 0.4% (11/2990) 0.2% (3/1495) 0.2% (-0.3%; 0.4%)
Corrado (2012) 1.0% (30/2990) 0.8% (4/487) 0.2% (-0.1%; 0.8%)
An increase in rate of spontaneous abortion compared with controls was seen in all study groups following amniocentesis, although the difference did not reach significance in four series. Tabor's data are the only data from a randomized controlled trial.
%: percent.
Graphic 57339 Version 4.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟