ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : -8 مورد

Behavioral approaches to smoking cessation

Behavioral approaches to smoking cessation
Author:
Elyse R Park, PhD, MPH
Section Editors:
Mark D Aronson, MD
Hasmeena Kathuria, MD
Deputy Editor:
Sara Swenson, MD
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: Apr 30, 2025.

INTRODUCTION — 

Tobacco use is the most preventable cause of cancer incidence and mortality [1]. Smoking is associated with the development of cancers, cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other diseases. Yet, 12 percent of the United States population, almost 29 million adults, currently use cigarettes [2].

Discontinuing smoking is an important goal for patients. Approximately two-thirds of adults who smoke want to quit smoking, and each year, approximately one-half of smokers in the United States make an attempt to quit [3-5].

Smoking rates in the United States have declined over the past decade, except for among individuals with low incomes and adults ages 65 years and older [6]. The majority of adults who try to quit do not use evidence-based counseling or medication support; however, even brief advice from a health professional can increase an individual's chances of quitting [7]. Older individuals are less likely to attempt to quit and less likely to be advised to quit [8].

The behavioral approach to smoking cessation will be discussed in this topic. An overview of smoking cessation and pharmacologic therapies for smoking cessation are discussed separately. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults" and "Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults".)

ASSESS READINESS — 

Assessment of willingness to quit smoking for every patient at every clinic visit offers an opportunity to encourage smoking cessation. The three-step model, such as the Ask-Advise-Refer or Ask-Advise-Connect, facilitates routine assessment, brief advice, and referral to evidence-based behavioral or pharmacologic treatment (figure 1). (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Three-step model'.)

The three-step model proactively offers treatment during the visit, as clinicians routinely do for other chronic conditions, such as hypertension [9]. This method is described separately. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Interventions for all patients'.)

An alternative model called the Five A's (table 1) encourages clinicians to:

Ask patients about smoking

Advise all patients who smoke to quit

Assess their readiness to quit

Assist them with their smoking cessation effort (table 2)

Arrange for follow-up visits or contact

The Five A's model is described separately. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Alternative models'.)

Brief counseling for smoking cessation has demonstrated efficacy. In a study of participants who attended a routine primary care appointment, one in five people who smoked was willing to make a serious quit attempt with the help of treatment that incorporated evidence-based counseling and a smoking cessation medication [10].

However, clinicians frequently miss opportunities for counseling during office visits. Data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey showed that the vast majority of people who smoke did not receive clinician counseling to quit during an office visit [11-13]. Furthermore, patients are significantly less likely to be assessed for tobacco use during a telehealth primary care visit than an in-person visit [14].

PATIENTS READY TO QUIT — 

A combination of behavioral approaches and pharmacotherapy is most helpful to patients trying to quit [15-19]. While behavioral approaches can be used to help cope with nicotine withdrawal symptoms, most people will also benefit from the use of pharmacotherapy. (See "Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults".)

Selection of behavioral therapy — All people who are ready to quit smoking should be encouraged to participate in behavioral counseling programs. Many different behavioral counseling formats are available, including face-to-face modalities (eg, individual patient-clinician encounters and group therapy) as well as other delivery formats, including telephone contact, text messaging, interactive web-based interventions, mobile applications (apps), and website information resources. These other formats can be either standalone tools for patients who are unable to participate in face-to-face counseling or adjuncts to in-person counseling. The different formats generally have in common certain techniques and components of educational content. (See 'Content of therapy' below.)

Of most importance is selecting behavioral therapy modalities that will be most engaging and acceptable to the patient, considering patient preference, medical history, beliefs, and availability. Patients may benefit from using more than one modality, such as the combination of group therapy and text messaging. Those who choose not to access therapy can benefit from self-help information resources. Special considerations in selecting effective behavioral therapies for individuals with severe mental illness are described separately. (See "Cardiovascular risk in patients with serious mental illness: Managing antipsychotic-associated obesity", section on 'Addressing challenges in serious mental illness'.)

Formats for behavioral counseling have been evaluated in numerous studies, and many methods of behavioral counseling and support used alone or in combination have been found to be effective. Both individual and group therapy are effective in achieving smoking cessation [20,21]. Availability and robustness of studies showing efficacy vary considerably among the different modalities [22,23].

In the United States, many health insurance plans cover tobacco-cessation interventions, including behavioral counseling as well as pharmacotherapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [24].

Brief intervention — For many patients, face-to-face behavioral therapy will consist of only brief clinician counseling in the office. Busy clinicians of any specialty can effectively provide brief advice interventions that increase overall tobacco abstinence rates. This brief counseling should be offered to all people who smoke [7]. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Advise to stop tobacco use'.)

The main components of counseling to include are education about withdrawal symptoms, identification of triggers for smoking and coping skills to address those triggers, and stress management techniques. These are discussed in detail separately. (See 'Content of therapy' below.)

Individual counseling — Some patients may engage in formal individual counseling for a period of time to support them through smoking cessation. In-person counseling may consist of multiple visits (often weekly) that start before the quit date. A follow-up visit should be scheduled within a week after the quit date. Visits should continue for one to at least three months after quitting to support the patient through the quitting process. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Ongoing monitoring' and "Overview of psychotherapies", section on 'Cognitive and behavioral therapies'.)

A systematic review found that individual counseling compared with minimal support improved quit rates by 40 to 80 percent, with a small additional benefit associated with having more sessions [21]. Nevertheless, formal individual counseling is infrequently used, possibly because of the intensity of involvement required and the increasing availability of other resources.

Group counseling — Group therapy allows patients to learn behavioral techniques while mutually supporting others attempting to quit. Group programs typically include informational presentations about the quitting process, group interactions, exercises on identification of triggers to smoke and coping strategies to address those triggers, a tapering method leading to a "quit day," development of coping skills, and suggestions for relapse prevention (see 'Content of therapy' below). Only a minority of people are willing to attend such programs, citing the inconvenience, even though group counseling is offered by a number of commercial and voluntary health programs and by some employers and public health resources. The cost can vary from free to several hundred dollars.

Studies have found that group counseling is effective. One-year quit rates after smoking cessation group counseling programs were approximately 20 percent [7,25,26]. A systematic review found that group therapy was nearly twice as effective as self-help programs [27].

Telehealth counseling — Telephone counseling can be used as the primary behavioral therapy approach or incorporated into a team-based approach to smoking cessation.

Proactive telephone counseling has been shown to be more effective than reactive telephone counseling. In the proactive approach, a counselor initiates a call on a prearranged schedule; in reactive counseling, an individual initiates the call to a counselor. Most quitlines offer proactive calls several times during the quitting process, and many quitlines offer client-initiated reactive counseling also.

Individuals can access free proactive telephone counseling throughout the United States at a toll-free number (1-800-QUIT-NOW). Some states in the United States have developed fax-referral programs to link clinician offices to their state telephone quitline. In some states, the quitline distributes free nicotine replacement therapy to eligible quitline callers [28].

Telephone counseling programs are more effective than simple self-help interventions, in which people are provided with take-home written or audiovisual material to aid them in quitting on their own [29]. In a clinical trial, among practices that were randomized to routinely refer people to a telephone quitline, patients had higher smoking cessation rates at 3 and 12 months compared with those who received standard general practitioner care [30].

Proactive telephone counseling has been shown to have efficacy in several studies, whereas data about reactive counseling are mixed [29,31,32]. One meta-analysis found quit rates were higher for those who received multiple proactive counselling calls after having called the quitline (risk ratio [RR] 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.49). Three or more proactive calls increased the chances of quitting, and there was some evidence of a dose response. A randomized trial of a proactive, personalized telephone counseling intervention in adolescents also found improved smoking abstinence at six months, particularly among those who smoked daily (10 versus 6 percent) [33]. By contrast, data on reactive telephone counseling provide only limited evidence as to whether there is any improvement in quit rates among those receiving reactive counseling compared with non-telephone-based controls [31,34].

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has expedited video-based delivery of tobacco treatment. Although video-based delivery is often well received, little research has compared it with phone-based or in-person delivery [35,36].

Text messaging — Mobile phone text messaging consists of personalized smoking cessation support through a series of automated motivational messages. Messages suggest behavioral changes and provide positive feedback while allowing patients to request additional assistance as needed. Automated text messages provide immediate cessation support and assistance when cravings occur [37].

The National Cancer Institute has developed a mobile phone smoking cessation service for adolescents and young adults: SmokefreeTXT program.

Several randomized trials have found that text messaging is effective for short- and long-term abstinence. In a 2019 meta-analysis including 13 randomized or quasi-randomized trials and 14,000 participants, automated text-based interventions increased six-month abstinence compared with minimal smoking cessation support (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.19-2.00) [38]. Furthermore, the addition of text messaging to another smoking cessation intervention was more effective than the other intervention alone (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.33).

Web resources and interventions — Smoking cessation interventions that are delivered in more than one format increase abstinence rates. Thus, supplementing information discussed during interventions with self-help materials can serve both as a reinforcement and a time-saving resource for the clinician.

Several organizations provide patient resource areas or learning centers where patients can access additional materials. Web-based tools may assist in smoking cessation, most notably if the materials are tailored to the user, interactive, and accessed frequently [39,40].

Website resources include the following:

The Great American Smokeout – Offers telephone, text, tailored email web-based support and apps to support smoking cessation. Includes information and resources from the American Cancer Society to help with quitting smoking.

Stop Smoking – Offers information and resources, as well as contact with a counselor via telephone, email, or a chat function. Includes an online guide by the American Lung Association on smoking cessation.

National Cancer Institute – Offers telephone and online support. Includes information on smoking cessation in English and Spanish and general information on health effects of tobacco.

Smokefree.gov – Offers free texting programs, telephonic and chat support, access to smartphone apps, information on healthy habits and the effects of smoking on health, and tips on preparing to quit, including resources specifically for females and teens, in English and Spanish on a website of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Includes a tool patients may use to build their quit plan.

How Much Will You Save? – Calculates how much money is saved after one day, one month, or up to 10 years of not buying cigarettes; offered through Smokefree.gov.

Systematic reviews have found that interactive or individually tailored web-based approaches are more effective than non-interactive approaches [39,40]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized trials found that, compared with usual care or self-help, interactive or individually tailored web interventions improved smoking cessation rates at six months (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11-2.78), particularly when the intervention included phone contacts (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.42-2.97) [39]. Web-based interventions may be less effective compared with telephone counseling via quitlines [41]. (See 'Telehealth counseling' above.)

Interventions leveraging social network platforms (eg, Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp) to deliver smoking cessation treatment have shown promising results in helping motivated individuals to quit and avoid relapse [42,43].

Phone and mobile apps — Mobile smoking cessation applications (apps) have the potential to be useful as behavioral therapy tools. However, studies of smoking cessation apps have not confirmed their efficacy and suggest that they often do not adhere to clinical practice guidelines [44-50]. Some interventions use virtual reality to cope with smoking urges and promote abstinence [51].

Mobile app resources include the following:

quitSTART – Offers resources to prepare for smoking cessation. Includes games and challenges to distract from cravings and badges to show off achievements. Keeps track of helpful tips and information.

Stay Quit Coach 2 – Offers smoking cessation resources for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Includes medication reminders, motivational messaging, and coping strategies from the National Center for PTSD.

LIVESTRONG MyQuit Coach – Offers a personalized plan designed to act as a support system. It includes a community feature where individuals can connect with others.

iCanQuit app – Offers support using an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) model.

A 2024 umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses found mixed evidence for the efficacy of mobile apps for smoking cessation [52]. Three meta-analyses found that mobile apps did not significantly improve smoking cessation, although the results were imprecise. Mobile apps were more likely to be efficacious when they were combined with face-to-face interventions or based on a theoretical framework, such as the transtheoretical model of behavioral change.

Self-help — For patients who do not have time or access to face to-face counseling, telephonic, text or web-based individualized therapies, self-help materials can be helpful.

Self-help materials, including pamphlets, audiotapes, or videotapes, have been found to be slightly more effective than no treatment intervention [53]. A randomized controlled trial found that 10 mailings of booklets and additional material over 18 months produced a higher abstinence rate at two years than providing only one booklet at the onset of the study (30 versus 19 percent abstinence rate) [54]. In addition, in a 2019 Cochrane review, when tailored and non-tailored materials were matched to non-tailored materials in terms of contact, there was no conclusive evidence of benefit of the tailored materials in assisting patients with smoking cessation [55].

However, when used as an adjunct to counseling or nicotine replacement therapy, there is no evidence of additional benefit from self-help materials [53].

Content of therapy — A common feature of the various formats of smoking cessation therapy is that they equip the individual with information about expected challenges during quit attempts and strategies to deal with them. Effective therapies generally begin before the patient's quit date to educate about withdrawal symptoms and effective techniques to use while stopping smoking, as well as techniques to use to maintain abstinence.

Techniques from cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) offer keys to successful quitting. These techniques include learning to identify and avoid smoking triggers and developing tools to deal with situations that may tempt smoking. Other components of CBT include education about self-monitoring, reducing cigarette intake gradually in preparation for quitting (although some people choose to quit abruptly), and setting a quit date. Effective therapy includes social support delivered as part of treatment to reinforce an individual's confidence in their ability to quit [7,27,56]. Ideally, all the elements of CBT for smoking cessation should be incorporated into a treatment plan. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Set a quit date' and "Overview of psychotherapies", section on 'Cognitive and behavioral therapies'.)

Components of ACT may be useful in behavioral smoking cessation interventions [57,58]. ACT teaches acceptance of aversive physical experiences (eg, cravings), thoughts, and emotions. ACT teaches a focus on emphasizing personal values (eg, being healthy and quitting smoking) and acting in alignment with one's values. Through acceptance and commitment, individuals may be able to be more flexible in their response to smoking urges and then make behavior changes.

Education about withdrawal symptoms — Education to expect symptoms of nicotine withdrawal reminds patients that smoking is addictive and that tobacco dependence should be treated as a chronic disease. Individuals should be educated that withdrawal symptoms typically peak one to two weeks after quitting but may continue for months. A fact sheet from the National Cancer Institute explains how to handle nicotine withdrawal symptoms and triggers. (See "Benefits and consequences of smoking cessation", section on 'Nicotine withdrawal syndrome'.)

Identification of triggers — An important goal of therapy is to help people identify their triggers to smoke. The person anticipating quitting should be encouraged to identify situations, internal states, or activities that may increase the risk of continuing to smoke or of relapsing [7]. Examples of common triggers include stressful situations, being around others who smoke, consuming alcohol, or drinking coffee.

Problem-solving and coping skills — Once people have identified situations that trigger them to smoke, they should engage in problem-solving and practice coping skills to deal with such problems.

Problem-solving is a process to generate potential solutions to address each trigger to smoke, and then evaluate and select among the solutions. Coping skills to address smoking triggers include strategies to avoid, change, or escape (ACE strategies) from high-risk situations (table 3). These coping skills help patients avoid temptation, reduce negative moods, and enact lifestyle changes that reduce stress and improve quality of life.

Examples of coping strategies include [59]:

Exercise – Use exercise as an outlet and a way to address post-smoking cessation weight gain.

No-smoking zones – Enact no-smoking policies for home and car to minimize time spent with people who smoke.

Behavioral distraction – Engage in repetitive or simple activities (eg, doodling, knitting).

Cognitive distraction – Think about what needs to be done (eg, for work, errands). Make a to-do list of priorities.

Oral strategies – Chew gum, drink a glass of water or have a small, healthy snack.

Positive self-talk and visualization – Think "this will get easier," or visualize yourself not smoking.

Benefits of quitting – Remember the health benefits of quitting. Think of being able to save the money you now spend on smoking. (See "Benefits and consequences of smoking cessation".)

Although no specific coping strategy has been proven effective, some studies suggest that combining exercise programs with programs for smoking cessation may improve quit rates, and involving a friend in a walking routine can help increase the sense of support [59,60]. Inconsistency among exercise study results may reflect small sample sizes and variable intensities of recommended exercise programs.

Stress management and relaxation strategies — Stress is a commonly reported barrier to quitting smoking and maintaining abstinence. Clinicians can encourage patients to be aware of stress-related symptoms that they experience as a significant trigger to smoke (eg, muscle tension, irritability, difficulty concentrating, drinking alcohol), and to practice strategies to counter stress and avoid smoking.

Stress management strategies that may be helpful include deep breathing, guided imagery, progressive muscle relaxation, brief meditation, or stretching. Mindfulness interventions focused on decoupling associations between cravings and smoking have also been used increasingly in smoking cessation treatment. (See "Complementary and alternative treatments for anxiety symptoms and disorders: Physical, cognitive, and spiritual interventions".)

There is limited evidence that mindfulness interventions are efficacious as a standalone treatment for smoking. According to a 2022 Cochrane review, individuals who received mindfulness training were no more likely to quit smoking than individuals who received intensity-matched smoking cessation treatments or no support [61]. Mindfulness interventions showed benefits (eg, stress reduction) as a complementary treatment with other smoking cessation treatments [62].

If the patient is experiencing nicotine symptoms that are contributing to the feelings of stress, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) may be added or adjusted. (See "Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults", section on 'Nicotine replacement therapy'.)

Supportive therapy — Positive encouragement and support are crucial in promoting healthy behavior change [7]. Clinicians can provide encouragement in many ways during a quit attempt, including:

Communicating belief in the patient's ability to quit

Providing education about quitting, such as explaining that one-half of people who ever smoked have now successfully quit

Communicating caring and concern by asking about emotions and fears about quitting and offering willingness to help

Discussing the quitting process, including concerns, motivators, and difficulties throughout the process

Duration of therapy — We typically encourage a patient to use behavioral therapy weekly or biweekly while preparing to quit and through the quitting process, which may take up to a few months. After quitting, we encourage the patient to have up to three monthly check-ins to maintain smoke-free status. Studies support the benefit of continued counseling for six months. During this period, the patient is likely to be experiencing withdrawal symptoms and adjusting to changes in lifestyle and may be particularly vulnerable to relapse. For a patient using a different method of delivery of behavioral therapy (eg, text messaging, mobile apps, web resources, self-help), although data are limited as to the effects of duration on quit rates, these methods are generally easily accessible for a patient and typically available at no cost.

Meta-analyses of randomized trials found a dose-response relationship between the duration of counseling (both number of sessions and length of each session) and abstinence rates [21]. Counseling that lasted more than 10 minutes and consisted of four or more sessions was particularly effective [7,21,63]. However, a randomized controlled trial found that extending CBT to 48 weeks, after receiving 26 weeks of CBT along with initial or extended pharmacotherapy, offered no additional benefit compared with having a briefly monthly call, with 40 percent seven-day smoking abstinence rates for both groups [20]. In a systematic review, results were mixed as to whether number of calls in a telephone counseling program influenced smoking cessation rates; most of the studies used three or more calls [31].

PATIENTS WHO RECENTLY QUIT — 

People who successfully quit smoking may also experience a variety of symptoms which can benefit from behavioral therapies, including depression or a sense of lack of support. Continuing to follow patients after they discontinue smoking offers the clinician the opportunity to identify these symptoms and provide counseling and/or medication for depression, as well as advice about support organizations such as the national quitline network (1-800-QUIT-NOW) for support [7].

Follow-up after quitting is described separately. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Ongoing monitoring'.)

Techniques to address nicotine withdrawal symptoms or weight gain, are addressed separately. (See "Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults".)

Relapse is discussed separately. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Patients with relapse or difficulty quitting'.)

DIFFICULTY QUITTING — 

Patients may have difficulty quitting smoking for many reasons. Positive support, along with other behavioral techniques and, when needed, pharmacotherapy adjustments to address nicotine withdrawal or other symptoms are described separately. (See "Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults", section on 'Assess and respond to adherence issues and side effects' and "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Address barriers to quit'.)

PATIENTS NOT READY TO QUIT — 

For individuals who are not ready to quit, motivational interviewing can create and amplify the discrepancy between present behavior and broader goals by exploring feelings, beliefs, ideas, and values regarding tobacco use [64,65].

In addition, patients who are not ready to quit in the next month may be willing to take pharmacotherapy to help them to reduce cigarettes smoked in preparation for quitting in the future [66]. This is reviewed in detail elsewhere. (See "Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation in adults", section on 'Patients who are willing to "cut down" or make changes'.)

Techniques for motivational interviewing — In motivational interviewing, a clinician uses a series of directive and nondirective approaches. Motivational interviewing aims to build intrinsic motivation to change and to resolve ambivalence about change, and to contrast where a patient is with where a patient wants to be (eg, smoke-free). Through trained strategic questioning and listening, a clinician can help patients resolve their ambivalence about behavior change such as quitting smoking.

Several models and techniques are available to help guide any of a patient's clinicians through a useful set of questions that constitutes a motivational interview [67].

The Five R's model — For patients unwilling to quit smoking, the "Five R's" model (table 4) can be useful [68]. This is a brief motivational interviewing technique aiming to increase motivation and future quit attempts:

Relevance – Use motivational information that is personally relevant to a patient's circumstances, such as their disease status or risk, prior quitting experience, and personal barriers to cessation.

Risks – Ask the patient to identify potential negative consequences associated with tobacco use. Stress the risks most applicable to the patient, including:

Acute health risks – Shortness of breath, harm to pregnancy

Long-term risks – Heart attacks and stroke, lung, and other cancers

Environmental risks – Increased risk of lung cancer in partners, respiratory infections in children of those who smoke

Rewards – Encourage the patient to identify potential benefits of quitting smoking and highlight those most relevant to the patient, such as improved health in themselves and their family members, saving money, improved performance in sports, etc.

Roadblocks – Invite the patient to identify barriers or impediments to quitting and suggest treatments (problem-solving counseling, medication) that could address such barriers.

Repetition – Repeat the motivational intervention every time an unmotivated patient visits the clinic setting. Tobacco users who have failed in previous quit attempts should be reminded that the majority of people make repeated quit attempts before they achieve success.

Reassessing reasons for smoking — Another useful approach to understand a patient's motivation for smoking is to explore the patient's likes and dislikes about smoking. Questions a clinician can ask to elicit reasons for smoking or quitting include:

What do you like/not like about smoking?

What do you worry will happen if you quit smoking? If you don't quit?

What are some of the benefits that you would hope to gain by quitting?

A numerical or descriptive scale can elicit current thinking about making a smoking behavior change. A scale can also provide valuable information on how to best direct efforts with the patient. With a 0 to 10 scale, the clinician asks:

"On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being not at all important and 10 being very important, how important is it for you to quit smoking?" The patient's response is used for the next questions, eg, if the patient selects '6,' ask:

"Why is it a 6 and not a 3?"

"Why is it a 6 and not an 8?"

Alternatively, with a descriptive scale, adjectives are used:

"Can you tell me how important it is to quit smoking?" The clinician then uses the patient's adjective in the next question:

"Why is it 'very important' and not just 'somewhat important'?"

"What would have to happen to make it extremely or really, really important to you?"

Providing information about harms of smoking — The "elicit-provide-elicit" strategy is an effective way to share information about a patient's health and the harms of smoking. With this collaborative approach, a clinician finds out what a patient wants to know and how a patient interprets the information provided by exploring a patient's concerns, knowledge, and questions about smoking. The strategy assumes that patients will value information that they request and perceive it as relevant.

Elicit a patient's perspective on smoking:

"What do you think is the connection between your smoking and your illness?"

"Would you like to know about how smoking affects your illness?"

"What do you know about how smoking affects you?"

Provide information on what "usually" happens to patients who smoke:

"Usually, patients who smoke a pack a day have some difficulty breathing."

Elicit the patient's interpretation of this information:

"What do you think of this information about your smoking?"

"Would you like more information about smoking?"

Change talk and commitment to change — The clinician can help the patient by listening for or eliciting "change talk," which consists of statements by the patient indicating they are contemplating change. The clinician's goal is to move a patient into commitment talk and commitment to quit smoking.

The different levels of change talk can be categorized as desire, ability, reasons and need (DARN). When patients express such statements, they may be likely to move toward commitment (see "Brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol and other drug use: Goals and components", section on 'Change talk'):

Desire – "I wish I could stop smoking… I want to explore medications to stop smoking…"

Ability – "I could quit… I might be able to cut back on smoking…"

Reasons – "I want to quit because… It would be good for my health."

Need – "I need to quit… I must stop smoking."

Another approach to elicit DARN statements is to ask:

Desire – "Why do you want to quit smoking?"

Ability – "What makes you feel able to quit?"

Reasons – "What are a few reasons for quitting?"

Need – "Why do you think that you need to quit now?"

Specific principles and techniques of motivational interviewing are described in detail separately. (See "Substance use disorders: Motivational interviewing".)

Efficacy — Despite results of earlier systematic reviews which suggested a benefit of motivational interviewing (MI) [69-71], the efficacy of this approach is unclear. In a 2019 Cochrane review that included 36 trials, there was insufficient evidence to conclude if MI is more effective than other behavioral support for smoking cessation or if more intensive MI is more effective than less intensive MI [72].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — 

Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Smoking cessation, e-cigarettes, and tobacco control".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — 

UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topic (see "Patient education: Quitting smoking for adults (The Basics)")

Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient education: Quitting smoking (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Combine behavioral support with pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation – For patients who are willing to make changes to their smoking, we offer combined treatment with behavioral support and pharmacologic therapy. Combination therapy is superior to either behavioral intervention or pharmacologic therapy alone. (See "Overview of smoking cessation management in adults", section on 'Combined behavioral treatment and pharmacotherapy preferred'.)

Selection of behavioral intervention – Many different behavioral counseling formats are available, including face-to-face modalities (eg, individual patient-clinician encounters and group therapy) as well as other delivery formats, including telephone contact, text messaging, interactive web-based interventions, mobile applications, and website information resources. These other formats can be either standalone tools for patients who are unable to participate in face-to-face counseling or adjuncts to in-person counseling. We encourage the use of behavioral therapy modalities that will be most engaging and acceptable to the patient, and for the patient to use the maximal behavioral intervention available. (See 'Selection of behavioral therapy' above.)

In most settings, behavioral intervention generally consists of brief clinician counseling in the office, but we also refer patients to other resources, such as a free telephone quitline for continued counseling support. In the United States, this can be accessed through a national toll-free number (1-800-QUIT-NOW). For patients who have the time and access, formal individual or group counseling are effective options.

Content of behavioral interventions – A key to successful quitting is to equip patients who smoke with as much information as possible about what to expect during quit attempts, including expectations about nicotine withdrawal. Effective behavioral therapies generally use cognitive-behavioral techniques to provide practical counseling to avoid triggers and deal with situations that may tempt smoking. (See 'Content of therapy' above.)

Motivational interviewing for patients who are not yet ready to quit – For individuals who are not ready to quit, the clinician should assess their perspective of the risks and benefits of continuing to smoke to help them begin to think about quitting. Motivational interviewing techniques explore the patient's feelings, beliefs, ideas, and values regarding tobacco use. The "Five R's" model (Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks, Repetition) is a technique to promote motivation in patients who are unwilling to quit (table 4). (See 'Patients not ready to quit' above.)

  1. Islami F, Goding Sauer A, Miller KD, et al. Proportion and number of cancer cases and deaths attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:31.
  2. Cornelius ME, Loretan CG, Wang TW, et al. Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:397.
  3. VanFrank B, Malarcher A, Cornelius ME, et al. Adult Smoking Cessation - United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024; 73:633.
  4. Walton K, Wang TW, Schauer GL, et al. State-Specific Prevalence of Quit Attempts Among Adult Cigarette Smokers - United States, 2011-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68:621.
  5. United States Public Health Service Office of the Surgeon General. Smoking Cessation: A Report of the Surgeon General, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2020.
  6. Meza R, Cao P, Jeon J, et al. Trends in US Adult Smoking Prevalence, 2011 to 2022. JAMA Health Forum 2023; 4:e234213.
  7. Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical Practice Guideline, Public Health Service; US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 2008.
  8. Jordan H, Hidajat M, Payne N, et al. What are older smokers' attitudes to quitting and how are they managed in primary care? An analysis of the cross-sectional English Smoking Toolkit Study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e018150.
  9. Barua RS, Rigotti NA, Benowitz NL, et al. 2018 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Tobacco Cessation Treatment: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72:3332.
  10. Smith SS, McCarthy DE, Japuntich SJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapies in primary care clinics. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:2148.
  11. Ferketich AK, Khan Y, Wewers ME. Are physicians asking about tobacco use and assisting with cessation? Results from the 2001-2004 national ambulatory medical care survey (NAMCS). Prev Med 2006; 43:472.
  12. Thorndike AN, Regan S, Rigotti NA. The treatment of smoking by US physicians during ambulatory visits: 1994 2003. Am J Public Health 2007; 97:1878.
  13. Geletko KW, Graves K, Lateef H, Harman J. Tobacco Cessation Counseling and Medications Provided by Physicians to Tobacco Users During Primary Care Visits. J Prim Care Community Health 2022; 13:21501319221093115.
  14. Flocke SA, Albert EL, Lewis SA, et al. Association of COVID-19 and the Prevalence of In-person Versus Telehealth Primary Care Visits and Subsequent Impacts on Tobacco Use Assessment and Referral for Cessation Assistance. Nicotine Tob Res 2024; 26:1563.
  15. Suls JM, Luger TM, Curry SJ, et al. Efficacy of smoking-cessation interventions for young adults: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 2012; 42:655.
  16. Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Lancaster T. Additional behavioural support as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD009670.
  17. West R, Raw M, McNeill A, et al. Health-care interventions to promote and assist tobacco cessation: a review of efficacy, effectiveness and affordability for use in national guideline development. Addiction 2015; 110:1388.
  18. Stead LF, Koilpillai P, Fanshawe TR, Lancaster T. Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3:CD008286.
  19. US Preventive Services Task Force, Krist AH, Davidson KW, et al. Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Persons: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021; 325:265.
  20. Laude JR, Bailey SR, Crew E, et al. Extended treatment for cigarette smoking cessation: a randomized control trial. Addiction 2017; 112:1451.
  21. Lancaster T, Stead LF. Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD001292.
  22. Hartmann-Boyce J, Livingstone-Banks J, Ordóñez-Mena JM, et al. Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD013229.
  23. Theodoulou A, Fanshawe TR, Leavens E, et al. Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2025; 1:CD015120.
  24. McAfee T, Babb S, McNabb S, Fiore MC. Helping smokers quit--opportunities created by the Affordable Care Act. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:5.
  25. Spice P. Setting up a cessation service. BMJ 2004; 328:699.
  26. Jamrozik K. Population strategies to prevent smoking. BMJ 2004; 328:759.
  27. Stead LF, Carroll AJ, Lancaster T. Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD001007.
  28. Miller N, Frieden TR, Liu SY, et al. Effectiveness of a large-scale distribution programme of free nicotine patches: a prospective evaluation. Lancet 2005; 365:1849.
  29. Matkin W, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Hartmann-Boyce J. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 5:CD002850.
  30. Borland R, Balmford J, Bishop N, et al. In-practice management versus quitline referral for enhancing smoking cessation in general practice: a cluster randomized trial. Fam Pract 2008; 25:382.
  31. Stead LF, Hartmann-Boyce J, Perera R, Lancaster T. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD002850.
  32. Cheung YTD, Zhang MJ, Luk TT, et al. Telephone Counseling and Messaging Guided by Mobile Profiling of Tobacco Users for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e250764.
  33. Peterson AV Jr, Kealey KA, Mann SL, et al. Group-randomized trial of a proactive, personalized telephone counseling intervention for adolescent smoking cessation. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101:1378.
  34. Sood A, Andoh J, Verhulst S, et al. "Real-world" effectiveness of reactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Chest 2009; 136:1229.
  35. Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Telehealth Working Group. Telehealth Delivery of Tobacco Cessation Treatment in Cancer Care: An Ongoing Innovation Accelerated by the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:S21.
  36. Park ER, Chiles C, Cinciripini PM, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telehealth research in cancer prevention and care: A call to sustain telehealth advances. Cancer 2021; 127:334.
  37. Linnemayr S, Zutshi R, Shadel W, et al. Text Messaging Intervention for Young Smokers Experiencing Homelessness: Lessons Learned From a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9:e23989.
  38. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, et al. Mobile phone text messaging and app-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 10:CD006611.
  39. Civljak M, Stead LF, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD007078.
  40. Taylor GMJ, Dalili MN, Semwal M, et al. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 9:CD007078.
  41. Neri AJ, Momin BR, Thompson TD, et al. Use and effectiveness of quitlines versus Web-based tobacco cessation interventions among 4 state tobacco control programs. Cancer 2016; 122:1126.
  42. Pechmann C, Delucchi K, Lakon CM, Prochaska JJ. Randomised controlled trial evaluation of Tweet2Quit: a social network quit-smoking intervention. Tob Control 2017; 26:188.
  43. Ramo DE, Thrul J, Chavez K, et al. Feasibility and Quit Rates of the Tobacco Status Project: A Facebook Smoking Cessation Intervention for Young Adults. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17:e291.
  44. Abroms LC, Padmanabhan N, Thaweethai L, Phillips T. iPhone apps for smoking cessation: a content analysis. Am J Prev Med 2011; 40:279.
  45. Cheng F, Xu J, Su C, et al. Content Analysis of Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation in China: Empirical Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017; 5:e93.
  46. Thornton L, Quinn C, Birrell L, et al. Free smoking cessation mobile apps available in Australia: a quality review and content analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health 2017; 41:625.
  47. Formagini TD, Ervilha RR, Machado NM, et al. A review of smartphone apps for smoking cessation available in Portuguese. Cad Saude Publica 2017; 33:e00178215.
  48. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, et al. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 4:CD006611.
  49. Dar R. Effect of Real-Time Monitoring and Notification of Smoking Episodes on Smoking Reduction: A Pilot Study of a Novel Smoking Cessation App. Nicotine Tob Res 2018; 20:1515.
  50. Regmi K, Kassim N, Ahmad N, Tuah NA. Effectiveness of Mobile Apps for Smoking Cessation: A Review. Tob Prev Cessat 2017; 3:12.
  51. Sweileh WM. Technology-based interventions for tobacco smoking prevention and treatment: a 20-year bibliometric analysis (2003-2022). Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2024; 19:13.
  52. Rushender R, Logaraj M, Krishnamoorthy Y. Effectiveness of mobile phone applications for tobacco cessation: An umbrella review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 263:112425.
  53. Hartmann-Boyce J, Lancaster T, Stead LF. Print-based self-help interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD001118.
  54. Brandon TH, Simmons VN, Sutton SK, et al. Extended Self-Help for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Prev Med 2016; 51:54.
  55. Livingstone-Banks J, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Hartmann-Boyce J. Print-based self-help interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 1:CD001118.
  56. Stead LF, Lancaster T. Group behaviour therapy programmes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; :CD001007.
  57. Mak YW, Leung DYP, Loke AY. Effectiveness of an individual acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation, delivered face-to-face and by telephone to adults recruited in primary health care settings: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1719.
  58. Bricker JB, Sullivan BM, Mull KE, et al. Full-scale Randomized Trial Comparing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Telephone-Delivered Coaching With Standard Telephone-Delivered Coaching Among Medicare/Uninsured Quitline Callers. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:1556.
  59. O'Connell KA, Gerkovich MM, Cook MR, et al. Coping in real time: using Ecological Momentary Assessment techniques to assess coping with the urge to smoke. Res Nurs Health 1998; 21:487.
  60. Ussher MH, Taylor AH, Faulkner GE. Exercise interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; :CD002295.
  61. Jackson S, Brown J, Norris E, et al. Mindfulness for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 4:CD013696.
  62. Khanna S, Greeson JM. A narrative review of yoga and mindfulness as complementary therapies for addiction. Complement Ther Med 2013; 21:244.
  63. Lancaster T, Stead LF. Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; :CD001292.
  64. Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler CC. Motivational Interviewing in Health Care, New York, NY, The Guilford Press 2008.
  65. Amrhein PC, Miller WR, Yahne CE, et al. Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003; 71:862.
  66. Leone FT, Zhang Y, Evers-Casey S, et al. Initiating Pharmacologic Treatment in Tobacco-Dependent Adults. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202:e5.
  67. Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, et al. Table B1: Strategy. Motivational interviewing strategies. In: Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical Practice Guideline, Public Health Service; US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 2008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK63948/table/A28272/ (Accessed on November 06, 2017).
  68. Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35:158.
  69. Lindson-Hawley N, Thompson TP, Begh R. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD006936.
  70. Lundahl B, Burke BL. The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. J Clin Psychol 2009; 65:1232.
  71. Rubak S, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55:305.
  72. Lindson N, Thompson TP, Ferrey A, et al. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7:CD006936.
Topic 6920 Version 45.0

References