ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Sensitivity and specificity for melanoma diagnosis of different dermoscopic algorithms

Sensitivity and specificity for melanoma diagnosis of different dermoscopic algorithms
Algorithm/method Sensitivity (percent) Specificity (percent)
Amelanotic melanoma Pigmented melanoma Experts Nonexperts
Quantitative ABCD rule[1-8]   78-98 70-90 45-80
Menzies method[1,3,4,7,9,10] 54 86-95 71-78 38-76
7-point checklist[1-5,7,9,11-13] 41 62-95 71-87 35-97
Revised 7-point checklist[13]   88 75  
3-point checklist[9,14,15] 50 79-91 71-72 72
CASH algorithm[3,16]   87-98 68 67
Qualitative Pattern analysis[1,2,5,7,13]   82-85 79-88 61-79
References:
  1. Argenziano G, Soyer H, Chimenti S, et al, Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:679.
  2. Annessi G, Bono R, Sampogna F, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:759.
  3. Henning JS, Stein JA, Yeung J, et al. CASH algorithm for dermoscopy revisited. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:554.
  4. Blum A, Rassner G, Garbe C. Modified ABC-point list of dermoscopy: A simplified and highly accurate dermoscopic algorithm for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:672.
  5. Carli P, Quercioli E, Sestini S, et al. Pattern analysis, not simplified algorithms, is the most reliable method for teaching dermoscopy for melanoma diagnosis to residents in dermatology. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:981.
  6. Stolz W, Riemann A, Cognetta A, et al. ABCD rule of dermoscopy: a new practical method for early recognition of maligant melanoma. Eur J Dermatol 1994; 4:521.
  7. Pagnanelli G, Soyer HP, Argenziano G, et al. Diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions by dermoscopy: web-based training improves diagnostic performance of non-experts. Br J Dermatol 2003; 148:698.
  8. Dolianitis C, Kelly J, Wolfe R, Simpson P. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141:1008.
  9. Menzies SW, Kreusch J, Byth K, et al. Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:1120.
  10. Menzies SW, Ingvar C, Crotty KA, McCarthy WH. Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132:1178.
  11. Haenssle HA, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C, et al. Seven-point checklist for dermatoscopy: performance during 10 years of prospective surveillance of patients at increased melanoma risk. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:785.
  12. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, et al. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:1563.
  13. Argenziano G, Catricala C, Ardigo M, et al. Seven-Point Checklist of Dermoscopy Revisited. Br J Dermatol 2010.
  14. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154:431.
  15. Argenziano G, Puig S, Zalaudek I, et al. Dermoscopy improves accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:1877.
  16. Henning JS, Dusza SW, Wang SQ, et al. The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:45.
Reproduced with permission from: Drs. Ashfaq Marghoob and Natalia Jaimes.
Graphic 69408 Version 4.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟