ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Variability in oxygen saturation between oxygen conserving devices and continuous flow oxygen

Variability in oxygen saturation between oxygen conserving devices and continuous flow oxygen
Differences in resting and exercise pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) between four oxygen conserving devices (D1 through D4) set at "2," continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 L/min, and room air. On room air, the subjects had a mean SpO2 at rest of 94 percent, which increased by varying amounts with continuous oxygen and the four conserving devices. With exercise, the mean room air SpO2 decreased to just below 92 percent. Continuous flow oxygen increased the SpO2 to almost 98 percent, but the response to the conserving devices ranged from 93 to 95 percent. The variability between responses to continuous flow oxygen and the oxygen conserving devices emphasizes the need to evaluate the SpO2 response to the particular oxygen conserving device at rest and with exertion.
RA: room air.
Data from: Palwai A, Skowronski M, Coreno A, et al. Critical comparisons of the clinical performance of oxygen-conserving devices. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181:1061.
Graphic 73093 Version 7.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟