ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Diagnostic accuracy of melanoma specific structures[1-4]

Diagnostic accuracy of melanoma specific structures[1-4]
Melanoma specific structure Sensitivity (percent) Specificity (percent) Positive predictive value (percent) Negative predictive value (percent) Odds ratio*
Amelanotic melanoma Pigmented melanoma
1. Atypical network[1,3,5-14] 21 35-82 62-89 18-67 71-88 1.1-9
2. Peripheral streaks (pseudopods and radial streaming)[1,3,5-10,13-15] 5 9-32 77-99 22-77 54-86 1.6-5.8
3. Negative pigment network (asymmetrically located and disordered)[5,16]   22 95     1.8
4. Blotch (off-centered)[13,14]           4.1-4.9
5. Atypical dots and/or globules[3,6,7,13,14] 24 25-40 74-92 13-79 61-86 2.9-4.8
6. Regression structures
Scar-like areas[1,3,5,8] 23 17-36 93-99 89 70 4.4-18.3
Peppering[3,17] 22 85 93-99 27 99 3.5
Scar-like areas and peppering[3,5,6,13,14]   22-42 93-99 78   3.9-7.8
Blue-white veil overlying macular areas and scar-like areas and peppering[11,12,18]       44 91Δ 3.1-8.7
7. Blue-white veil overlying raised areas[1,3,5,6,8,9,13,14] 11 17-75 86-99 52-73 55-70 2.5-13
8. Atypical vascular structures[3,6,10,13,14,19-21] 63 9.4 54-96 69 53 1.5-7.4
Dotted + serpentine[3] 30   85     2.3
Serpentine vessels[3,22] 34   80 68   2.1
Polymorphous vessels[3,22]       68   2.1
Milky-red areas[3,22] 51   71

77.8

   2.5
Red globules[3,22] 21   88   2.0
9. Crystalline structures (also known as Chrysalis and shiny white streaks)[23]           9.7
10. Brown peripheral structureless areas[3,6] 19 63 93-96 94 73 2.9-28
* The odds ratios for the diagnosis of melanoma shown in the table are statistically significant since the 95% confidence intervals do not include the unit.
¶ When involving >50 percent of the lesion.
Δ When involving <50 percent of the lesion.
References:
  1. Soyer HP, Smolle J, Leitinger G, et al. Diagnostic reliability of dermoscopic criteria for detecting malignant melanoma. Dermatol 1995; 190:25.
  2. Marghoob AA, Korzenko AJ, Changchien L, et al. The beauty and the beast sign in dermoscopy. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33:1388.
  3. Menzies SW, Kreusch J, Byth K, et al. Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma . Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:1120.
  4. Stoecker WV, Stolz W. Dermoscopy and the diagnostic challenge of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2008; 144:1207.
  5. Menzies SW, Ingvar C, McCarthy WH. A sensitivity and specificity analysis of the surface microscopy features of invasive melanoma. Melanoma Res 1996; 6:55.
  6. Annessi G, Bono R, Sampogna F, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56:759.
  7. Haenssle HA, Korpas B, Hansen-Hagge C, et al. Seven-point checklist for dermatoscopy: performance during 10 years of prospective surveillance of patients at increased melanoma risk. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62:785.
  8. Salopek TG, Kopf AW, Stefanato CM, et al. Differentiation of atypical moles (dysplastic nevi) from early melanomas by dermoscopy. Dermatol Clin 2001; 19:337.
  9. Kenet RO, Kang S, Kenet BJ, et al. Clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions using digital epiluminescence microscopy. Grading protocol and atlas. Arch Dermatol 1993; 129:157.
  10. Pizzichetta MA, Stanganelli I, Bono R, et al. Dermoscopic features of difficult melanoma. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33:91.
  11. Soyer HP, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy. A new screening method for early detection of melanoma.Dermatology 2004; 208:27.
  12. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154:431.
  13. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, et al. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998; 134:1563.
  14. Argenziano G, Chimenti S, Talamini R, et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:679.
  15. Dal Pozzo V, Benelli C, Roscetti E. The seven features for melanoma: a new dermoscopic algorithm for the diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Eur J Dermatol 1999; 9:303.
  16. Marghoob AA. Unpublished data.
  17. Braun RP, Gaide O, Oliviero M, et al. The significance of multiple blue-grey dots (granularity) for the dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157:907.
  18. Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Ferrara G, et al. Clinically equivocal melanocytic skin lesions with features of regression: a dermoscopic-pathological study. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150:64.
  19. Bono A, Maurichi A, Moglia D, et al. Clinical and dermatoscopic diagnosis of early amelanotic melanoma. Melanoma Res 2011; 11:491.
  20. Pizzichetta MA, Talamini R, Stanganelli I, et al. Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: Clinical and dermoscopic features. Br J Dermatol 2004; 150:1117.
  21. Puig S, Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, et al. Melanomas that failed dermoscopic detection: A combined clinicodermoscopic approach for not missing melanoma. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33:1262.
  22. Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Corona R, et al. Vascular structures in skin tumors: a dermoscopy study. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140:1485.
  23. Balagula Y, Braun RP, Rabinovitz HS, et al. The significance of crystalline/chrysalis structures in the diagnosis of melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011. Epub ahead of print.
Reproduced with permission from Drs. Ashfaq Marghoob and Natalia Jaimes.
Graphic 74394 Version 6.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟