ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 1 مورد

Treatment of Rocky Mountain spotted fever

Treatment of Rocky Mountain spotted fever
Author:
Micah T McClain, MD, PhD
Section Editor:
Daniel J Sexton, MD
Deputy Editor:
Keri K Hall, MD, MS
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: Mar 28, 2024.

INTRODUCTION — 

Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a potentially lethal, but usually curable, tick-borne disease. RMSF occurs throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America, and in parts of South America. The etiologic agent, Rickettsia rickettsii, is a gram-negative, obligate intracellular bacterium causing a spectrum of disease ranging from mild to fulminant. Overall, mortality from RMSF has declined markedly, from 2.2 percent in 2000 to 0.3 percent in 2007 and has been mostly unchanged since that time, although mortality rates as high as 7 percent in some populations have been reported [1-3].

The treatment of RMSF will be reviewed here. The basic biology of R. rickettsii, and the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of RMSF are discussed separately. (See "Biology of Rickettsia rickettsii infection" and "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever".)

APPROACH — 

We recommend empiric therapy with doxycycline for patients with suspected RMSF, even if symptoms are mild. Early therapy is critical since a delay in treatment is associated with an increased risk of mortality.

When to suspect RMSF — A diagnosis of RMSF should be suspected in patients who are from an endemic area (or have visited one within the past 14 days) if they:

Present in the spring and summer months with fever and at least one of the following: headache, rash, constitutional symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities or thrombocytopenia and elevated liver functions tests. (See "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Clinical manifestations' and "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Laboratory findings'.)

and

Have a known tick bite or an exposure to environments where ticks are present. (See "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Epidemiology' and "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Vectors'.)

Importance of empiric therapy — Antimicrobial therapy should promptly be prescribed to all patients suspected to have RMSF on the basis of the preceding symptoms and possible tick exposure. (See 'When to suspect RMSF' above.)

Empiric therapy should not be delayed if RMSF is suspected and in patients who are severely ill (eg, severe headache or abdominal pain) and/or those who present with possible complications associated with RMSF (eg, seizures, other neurologic abnormalities, hypotension, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, jaundice). (See 'Importance of early therapy' below and 'Choice of antibiotic' below.)

RMSF can rarely be confirmed or disproved in its early phase. Thus decisions to use empiric therapy should be focused on the use of clinical judgment and the epidemiologic setting. Clinicians should not wait for the skin rash to develop before initiating treatment. (See 'Importance of early therapy' below.)

Patients with mild disease can generally be treated as outpatients. Patients with severe symptoms should be hospitalized. Additional management considerations for patients with severe disease include:

Empiric treatment for alternative diagnoses – Some patients with RMSF may need additional empiric treatment for an alternative diagnosis while awaiting results from the initial diagnostic evaluation (see "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Differential diagnosis'). As an example, the early signs and symptoms of invasive meningococcal infection and RMSF are similar in some patients. Thus, empiric antibiotic therapy for both conditions may be warranted. (See "Initial therapy and prognosis of community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults" and "Bacterial meningitis in children older than one month: Treatment and prognosis".)

Supportive care – Hemodynamic monitoring is important in severely ill patients since both hypovolemia and hypervolemia can occur. Hypervolemia can be present in severely ill patients because of the presence of heart failure due to myocarditis and an increase in systemic vascular permeability [4,5]. Mechanical ventilation, dialysis, transfusions, and medications to control seizures also may also be needed.

Importance of early therapy — Early therapy for RMSF is important since delays in treatment more than five to six days after symptom onset have been associated with an increased risk of mortality [3,6-8]. The adverse consequences of delayed therapy is illustrated in the following studies:

In a retrospective study of 94 patients with RMSF, those who were treated within five days of symptom onset were significantly less likely to die than those who were treated after the fifth day (6.5 versus 22.9 percent) [6]. In this study, 90 percent of patients saw a clinician during the first five days of illness; however, over half did not receive antirickettsial therapy at that time. Failure to initiate antirickettsial therapy was associated with absence of a skin rash, presentation within the first three days of illness, and presentation from August through April.

Similar findings were reported in another retrospective study of 205 cases of confirmed or probable RMSF [3]. Among the patients who died, doxycycline was initiated ≥6 days after symptom onset (median seven days compared with three days in those who did not die). Late initiation of antimicrobial therapy may have been due, in part, to a delay in including RMSF in the differential diagnosis.

A delay in therapy for some patients, may result from providers being unaware of the importance of early treatment. As an example, in a study of 84 providers, 23 percent incorrectly stated that it was appropriate to wait for the development of a skin rash before initiating therapy for RMSF [9].

CHOICE OF ANTIBIOTIC

Doxycycline as preferred agent — We recommend orally or intravenously administered doxycycline for the treatment of RMSF in adults and children [10,11]. If patients experience side effects to doxycycline such as nausea or diarrhea, we administer supportive treatment, such as antiemetics and antimotility agents. (See 'Drug toxicity' below and 'Duration of treatment' below.)

The use of doxycycline as the preferred agent is based upon in vitro data, animal studies, and over many decades of clinical experience [11]. In addition, the use of chloramphenicol (the only alternative agent) compared with tetracyclines has been associated with a higher risk of death [8,12]. In one retrospective study 213 deaths occurred among 6388 patients with RMSF from 1981 to 1998. The case fatality rate in patients treated only with chloramphenicol was significantly greater than that in patients treated only with tetracyclines (7.7 versus 1.6; odds ratio 5.5; 95% CI, 3.9-7.7 [8]).

Nonpregnant adults — Doxycycline given as 100 mg twice daily (orally or intravenously) is the recommended treatment for most adult patients. We administer a single loading dose of 200 mg to critically ill patients. Some providers give a loading regimen of doxycycline 200 mg intravenously every 12 hours for 72 hours since steady state serum concentrations of doxycycline are not achieved for up to 72 hours [13]. However, this theory has never been tested in vitro or in vivo.

Pregnant women — We also recommend doxycycline (100 mg twice daily [orally or intravenously]) for pregnant women with known or suspected RMSF rather than chloramphenicol. This approach is consistent with recommendations by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which reflect the opinion of experts in the field [14].

Chloramphenicol was once the preferred treatment for most pregnant women with RMSF because previously tetracyclines were thought to be contraindicated because of the risk of hepatotoxicity in the mother [11], permanent discoloration of fetal deciduous teeth in the second and third trimesters [15], and incorporation into fetal long tubular bones with transient inhibition of growth [16]. However, these events are extremely rare with doxycycline. Subsequent evidence supports the relative safety of doxycycline compared with older tetracyclines in both pregnancy and in children [17,18]. As an example, in a systematic review, there was no correlation between the use of doxycycline and teratogenic effects during pregnancy or dental staining in children [17]. Thus, given the efficacy of doxycycline and the lack of alternatives, the benefits outweigh the risks.

Children — The dose of doxycycline for children who weigh ≤45 kg is 2.2 mg/kg/dose twice per day (maximum daily dose 200 mg) [11,19]. Children who weigh >45 kg should receive the adult dose. Tetracyclines may cause dental staining when administered to children younger than eight years. However, the risk of dental staining is minimal if a short course is administered [20]. Also, in an observational study of 53 children who received approximately two courses of doxycycline for RMSF before they were eight years old, none developed dental staining in their permanent teeth [21]. The use of short courses of doxycycline in children of all ages is also supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics [22].

Alternative agent — Chloramphenicol is the only known alternative agent for the treatment of RMSF. To our knowledge, no other alternative agents have been tested in humans. Although chloramphenicol has activity against RMSF in both animal and human studies [23-25], it is less effective than doxycycline [8,19]. (See 'Doxycycline as preferred agent' above.)

Very rarely chloramphenicol may be indicated if a patient has a history of a severe adverse reaction to doxycycline (eg, toxic epidermal necrolysis, severe hepatoxicity). The recommended dose of chloramphenicol in such situations is 50 mg/kg per day in four divided doses (maximum 4 grams per day); dose reductions are required if used to treat neonates [26].

However, chloramphenicol may not be feasible option in the preceding scenario as it is difficult to rapidly obtain in the United States and some other countries. Chloramphenicol also has a low risk (1 in 25,000 to 40,000) of fatal aplastic anemia with chloramphenicol.

If chloramphenicol cannot be obtained, doxycycline is the only studied treatment option. Novel tetracycline-like derivatives such as tigecycline, eravacycline, and omadacycline show promising in vitro activity against rickettsial species but have not yet been studied in human infection [27,28]. For individuals with a history of an adverse reaction to doxycycline, consultation with an allergist should be obtained, if possible, to help minimize the risk of an adverse event.

In the rare case in which there is a history of IgE-mediated allergy to doxycycline and chloramphenicol is unavailable or contraindicated, rapid desensitization to doxycycline has been successfully reported [29,30].

Drug toxicity

Doxycycline — Doxycycline may cause mild nausea and vomiting but it is usually well tolerated. Patients should be informed about photosensitivity associated with the use of doxycycline and counseled to take appropriate protective measures (eg, hats, long-sleeved shirts, and sunscreen). Given the short duration of treatment, routine laboratory monitoring is not needed. Concerns related to the use of doxycycline in pregnancy are discussed above. (See 'Pregnant women' above.)

Chloramphenicol — Systemic chloramphenicol should be administered in an inpatient setting where close monitoring is available. A complete blood count should be obtained at baseline and repeated every two days. Chloramphenicol should be discontinued if hematologic abnormalities such as reticulocytopenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia occur. However, even when such monitoring is performed, irreversible bone marrow suppression may occur weeks or months after therapy has been discontinued.

If chloramphenicol is administered during the third trimester of pregnancy, it can be associated with "Gray baby syndrome" in premature infants and newborns [31]. "Gray baby syndrome" is characterized by cyanosis, abdominal distention, vasomotor collapse (often with irregular respiration), and death. The reaction appears to be associated with serum levels ≥50 mcg/mL [32].

Serum drug levels of chloramphenicol are recommended in adults and children with hepatic or renal impairment; however, monitoring these levels is not practical in patients with RMSF, since the duration of therapy is short and most commercial labs do not perform this type of testing.

RESPONSE TO THERAPY — 

Most patients respond quickly to therapy with rapid improvement in their clinical signs and symptoms. Mortality is uncommon if treatment is started within five days of the onset of symptoms. (See "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Mortality'.)

Patients with mild illness will typically defervesce within 48 to 72 hours. However, patients with severe illness may remain critically ill and febrile for five or more days after institution of therapy. Clinical relapse has not been described in patients appropriately treated with either doxycycline or chloramphenicol.

Patients who survive the initial episode generally undergo complete recovery and cure of the rickettsial infection [33]. However, a small percentage of patients with severe RMSF develop long-term sequelae, such as peripheral neuropathy, hemiparesis, or deafness [34]. In addition, patients with severe neurological involvement after delayed treatment can rarely have persistent and even worsening evidence of neurological damage, as detected by magnetic resonance imaging [35]. In such patients, there is no evidence that additional courses of treatment provide benefit, nor is there evidence of chronic or relapsing infection [36].

DURATION OF TREATMENT — 

Treatment should be continued for at least three days after the patient has become afebrile; most experts recommend a minimum of five to seven days of therapy. This recommendation is based upon clinical experience, as there are no controlled trials to suggest an alternative approach.

PREVENTION — 

There is no effective commercially available vaccine to prevent RMSF. Thus, early detection and removal of attached ticks is the best way to prevent disease transmission. Several hours of feeding are required for an infected tick to transmit R. rickettsii [37]. (See "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Transmission'.)

Patients who report tick bites should be advised to inform their clinicians if any symptoms (eg, fever and headache) develop in the following 14 days. (See "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever", section on 'Clinical manifestations'.)

Education about measures to prevent tick bites and reduce tick infestations are also important, as was illustrated in a community-based prevention program that was implemented in areas of hyperendemicity of RMSF in Mexico [38]. A more detailed discussion of how to prevent tick bites is found elsewhere. (See "Prevention of Lyme disease", section on 'Personal protection'.)

Prophylactic therapy with doxycycline or another tetracycline is not recommended following tick exposure [10,39]. Only a very small percentage of ticks (less than 2 percent) in endemic areas are infected with R. rickettsii [40-42], and animal data do not support the use of preventive antibiotics after a tick bite [43].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — 

Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Tick-borne infections (including Lyme disease, ehrlichiosis, babesiosis, rickettsial infections, and others)".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — 

UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topic (see "Patient education: Rocky Mountain spotted fever (The Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Epidemiology – Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) occurs throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America, and in parts of South America. The etiologic agent, Rickettsia rickettsii, causes a wide spectrum of clinical disease ranging from mild to fulminant infection. (See 'Introduction' above.)

Importance of early antibiotic therapy – If the diagnosis of RMSF is suspected, antimicrobial therapy should be initiated as soon as possible; delays in treatment of more than five days have been associated with an increased risk of mortality. Most patients will require empiric therapy based upon clinical judgment and the epidemiologic setting since RMSF can rarely be confirmed or disproved in its early phase. (See 'When to suspect RMSF' above and 'Importance of early therapy' above.)

Preferred antibiotic – For adults and children, we recommend doxycycline (Grade 1B). We prefer doxycycline even for pregnant women, since there is increasing evidence of the relative safety of doxycycline in pregnancy compared with older tetracyclines. (See 'Approach' above and 'Choice of antibiotic' above.)

Duration of therapy – Most patients respond quickly to therapy with a rapid improvement in their clinical signs and symptoms. Treatment should be continued for at least three days after the patient has become afebrile; most experts recommend a minimum of five to seven days of therapy. (See 'Response to therapy' above and 'Duration of treatment' above.)

Prevention – There is no commercially available vaccine to prevent RMSF. However, early detection and removal of attached ticks may prevent disease transmission. (See 'Prevention' above.)

  1. Openshaw JJ, Swerdlow DL, Krebs JW, et al. Rocky mountain spotted fever in the United States, 2000-2007: interpreting contemporary increases in incidence. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010; 83:174.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Statistics and Epidemiology. http://www.cdc.gov/rmsf/stats/ (Accessed on September 12, 2017).
  3. Regan JJ, Traeger MS, Humpherys D, et al. Risk factors for fatal outcome from rocky mountain spotted Fever in a highly endemic area-Arizona, 2002-2011. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:1659.
  4. Marin-Garcia J, Gooch WM 3rd, Coury DL. Cardiac manifestations of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Pediatrics 1981; 67:358.
  5. Rydkina E, Sahni A, Baggs RB, et al. Infection of human endothelial cells with spotted Fever group rickettsiae stimulates cyclooxygenase 2 expression and release of vasoactive prostaglandins. Infect Immun 2006; 74:5067.
  6. Kirkland KB, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. Therapeutic delay and mortality in cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 20:1118.
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Consequences of delayed diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in children--West Virginia, Michigan, Tennessee, and Oklahoma, May-July 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000; 49:885.
  8. Holman RC, Paddock CD, Curns AT, et al. Analysis of risk factors for fatal Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever: evidence for superiority of tetracyclines for therapy. J Infect Dis 2001; 184:1437.
  9. O'Reilly M, Paddock C, Elchos B, et al. Physician knowledge of the diagnosis and management of Rocky Mountain spotted fever: Mississippi, 2002. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003; 990:295.
  10. American Academy of Pediatrics. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. In: Red Book: 2012 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 29th ed, Pickering LK (Ed), American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL 2012.
  11. Chapman AS, Bakken JS, Folk SM, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis--United States: a practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006; 55:1.
  12. Dalton MJ, Clarke MJ, Holman RC, et al. National surveillance for Rocky Mountain spotted fever, 1981-1992: epidemiologic summary and evaluation of risk factors for fatal outcome. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 52:405.
  13. Cunha BA. Clinical features of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Lancet Infect Dis 2008; 8:143.
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF); Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment. https://www.cdc.gov/rmsf/symptoms/index.html (Accessed on June 06, 2017).
  15. Vennila V, Madhu V, Rajesh R, et al. Tetracycline-induced discoloration of deciduous teeth: case series. J Int Oral Health 2014; 6:115.
  16. Cohlan SQ, Bevelander G, Tiamsic T. Growth Inhibition of Prematures Receiving Tetracycline. Am J Dis Child 1963; 105:453.
  17. Cross R, Ling C, Day NP, et al. Revisiting doxycycline in pregnancy and early childhood--time to rebuild its reputation? Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016; 15:367.
  18. Cooper WO, Hernandez-Diaz S, Arbogast PG, et al. Antibiotics potentially used in response to bioterrorism and the risk of major congenital malformations. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2009; 23:18.
  19. Biggs HM, Behravesh CB, Bradley KK, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Other Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses, Ehrlichioses, and Anaplasmosis - United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016; 65:1.
  20. Lochary ME, Lockhart PB, Williams WT Jr. Doxycycline and staining of permanent teeth. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17:429.
  21. Todd SR, Dahlgren FS, Traeger MS, et al. No visible dental staining in children treated with doxycycline for suspected Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. J Pediatr 2015; 166:1246.
  22. American Academy of Pediatrics. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. In: Red Book: 2018 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, Kimberlin DW, Brady MT, Jackson MA, Long SS (Eds), 2018. p.697.
  23. DuPont HL, Hornick RB, Dawkins AT, et al. Rocky Mountain spotted fever: a comparative study of the active immunity induced by inactivated and viable pathogenic Rickettsia rickettsii. J Infect Dis 1973; 128:340.
  24. DuPont HL, Hornick RB, Weiss CF, et al. Evaluation of chloramphenicol acid succinate therapy of induced typhoid fever and rocky mountain spotted fever. N Engl J Med 1970; 282:53.
  25. Breitschwerdt EB, Davidson MG, Aucoin DP, et al. Efficacy of chloramphenicol, enrofloxacin, and tetracycline for treatment of experimental Rocky Mountain spotted fever in dogs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35:2375.
  26. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Red Book: 2012 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 29, Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, Long SS (Eds), American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove, IL 2012.
  27. Quade BR, Ramírez-Hernández A, Blanton LS. In Vitro Susceptibility of Rickettsia Species to Eravacycline, Omadacycline, and Tigecycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65:e0066521.
  28. Blanton LS, Wilson NM, Quade BR, Walker DH. Susceptibility of Rickettsia rickettsii to Tigecycline in a Cell Culture Assay and Animal Model for Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2019; 101:1091.
  29. Fernando SL, Hudson BJ. Rapid desensitization to doxycycline. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013; 111:73.
  30. Stollings JL, Chadha SN, Paul AM, et al. Doxycycline desensitization for a suspected case of ehrlichiosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2014; 2:103.
  31. Wiest DB, Cochran JB, Tecklenburg FW. Chloramphenicol toxicity revisited: a 12-year-old patient with a brain abscess. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2012; 17:182.
  32. Powell DA, Nahata MC. Chloramphenicol: new perspectives on an old drug. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1982; 16:295.
  33. Mead P. Epidemiology of Lyme Disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2022; 36:495.
  34. Archibald LK, Sexton DJ. Long-term sequelae of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 20:1122.
  35. Sun LR, Huisman TA, Yeshokumar AK, Johnston MV. Ongoing Cerebral Vasculitis During Treatment of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Pediatr Neurol 2015; 53:434.
  36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/rmsf/index.html (Accessed on March 28, 2024).
  37. Hayes SF, Burgdorfer W. Reactivation of Rickettsia rickettsii in Dermacentor andersoni ticks: an ultrastructural analysis. Infect Immun 1982; 37:779.
  38. Straily A, Drexler N, Cruz-Loustaunau D, et al. Notes from the Field: Community-Based Prevention of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever - Sonora, Mexico, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65:1302.
  39. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF). https://www.cdc.gov/rmsf/healthcare-providers/treatment.html (Accessed on September 18, 2019).
  40. Walker DH. Rocky Mountain spotted fever: a seasonal alert. Clin Infect Dis 1995; 20:1111.
  41. Pretzman C, Daugherty N, Poetter K, Ralph D. The distribution and dynamics of Rickettsia in the tick population of Ohio. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990; 590:227.
  42. Kakumanu ML, Ponnusamy L, Sutton H, et al. Prevalence of Rickettsia Species (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) in Dermacentor variabilis Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in North Carolina. J Med Entomol 2018; 55:1284.
  43. Kenyon RH, Williams RG, Oster CN, Pedersen CE Jr. Prophylactic treatment of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. J Clin Microbiol 1978; 8:102.
Topic 7912 Version 24.0

References