L.M. Hollestein,S.N. Lo,J. Leonardi-Bee,S. Rosset,N. Shomron,D.-L. Couturier,S. Gran
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20600
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1081-1083
B.F. Chong
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20746
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1084-1084
Expert consensus guidelines can be helpful in advising clinicians on the diagnosis, management and treatment of diseases. The generation of these guidelines can be achieved via a variety of methods including a Delphi process, which utilizes questionnaires to achieve consensus among experts,1 and other evidence-based methodologies.2 Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), an autoimmune and photosensitive skin disease, can be complex for patients and their providers because CLE has multiple clinical presentations, does not have curative treatments, and can be challenging to manage due to its waxing and waning nature. Thus, there is high utility for the creation of expert treatment and management guidelines to help patients and providers navigate the complex issues that patients with CLE often face.
E. Sbidian,L. Pina-Vegas
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20771
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1085-1085
Psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders that can significantly alter patients’ quality of life.1, 2 Although there is no cure for these two conditions, insights into their pathogenesis have led to the development of cytokine-based therapies that have revolutionized their management. As the interleukin (IL)-23/T-helper (Th)17 immune axis plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of both PsO and PsA, there has been interest in targeting this pathway for their treatment.3, 4 Once the benefit of a treatment has been established against placebo, only head-to-head trials are helpful in providing physicians with efficacy estimates between the different biologics.
S. Gerdes,J. Albrecht
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20715
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1086-1087
Risankizumab is the latest of three approved monoclonal anti-interleukin (IL)-23p19 antibodies for the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis. One-year studies demonstrated good efficacy and safety, and further comparative trials showed risankizumab to be more effective than other standard therapies such as fumaric acid esters, adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab.1, 2
I. Kotb
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20716
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1087-1088
Biological therapy has revolutionized the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The decision-making around the choice of biologic, considering efficacy, safety profile, therapeutic longevity, patient satisfaction and comorbidities, has always been a challenge in daily clinical practice. Selective inhibition of the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23 has emerged as a new therapeutic target allowing for maintained high clinical efficacy and improved biological safety by preserving the IL-12 mediated T helper 1 response.1 Guselkumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the IL-23p19 subunit. VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 were the first phase III clinical trials to compare the efficacy and safety of guselkumab to placebo and adalimumab in 1829 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.2-4 Patients were randomized to group 1 (guselkumab 100 mg), group 2 (placebo then crossover to guselkumab at week 16) and group 3 (adalimumab at standard psoriasis dose). All participants received guselkumab every 8 weeks from week 52 to week 252. Results from both studies have shown that guselkumab is superior to placebo at week 16 and adalimumab at week 24. These high efficacy rates were maintained for 4 years, where 82–85% of patients achieved a ? 90% or more reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-90) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of 0/1 (clear/minimal).5 Rates of discontinuation of guselkumab due to lack of efficacy in both studies was < 2%. Between 70% and 75% of patients achieved a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) of 0/1 (no effect of psoriasis on patient life), and this proportion was maintained for over 4 years. A Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) summary score of 0 (symptom-free) was recorded in 35–40%, and 77–83·4% of patients scored < 8 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A and HADS-D; i.e. no anxiety or depression).
P. Wolf
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20710
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1088-1089
Reports on antipsoriatic treatment responses specifically evaluating sex differences are scarce. Maul et al.1 undertook a major effort and now report from a two-country study on data of more than 5300 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis extracted from psoriasis registries of Germany (PsoBest) and Switzerland (SDNTT). These registries are fed by data from 880 office-based dermatology practices and academic or hospital-based outpatient clinics in Germany and eight academic dermatology departments in Switzerland. The investigators report slight but statistically significant better response rates throughout the 12-month observation period of the study in women compared with men, who started their treatments with slightly higher Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. After 12 months, 72·3% of women vs. 66·1 of men not only reached PASI75 reduction or an absolute PASI of ? 3 but also in parallel, a significantly higher proportion of women experienced a better quality of life during the observation period, measured by improvement of the Dermatological Quality of Life Index (DLQI) score of ? 4 in 70·7% of women vs. 64·4% men. Of importance to note, the range of percentages of women and men (40·4% vs. 59·6%) in this analysis were similar to that in other registry reports.2, 3 However, at treatment baseline, women not only had a lower PASI score than men (13·1 vs. 14·9), consistent with previous work,4 but also were slightly older (48·3 vs. 47·1 years) and had less body weight (77·5 vs. 90·9 kg), although their body mass index was nearly identical (28·2 vs. 28·5 kg m–2). With regard to treatment allocation, the majority of patients (71·6% of women and 69·4% of men) in this two-country analysis had received nonbiologic agents, i.e. mainly fumaric acid esters and methotrexate although the latter drug was administered less often in women than in men (4·4% vs. 15·8%). The biologics administered to the remaining smaller portion (around 30%) of patients included etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab.
A.D. Ormerod
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20713
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1089-1090
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) has a severe impact on patients and their quality of life. It is challenging to treat, and response to therapy is frequently disappointing. It carries significant morbidity and is associated with increased mortality.1 Through anecdotal evidence, limited case series and a previous population-based study, numerous well-known underlying conditions predispose to, or are associated with, PG in about 50% of cases, demanding that clinicians need to always consider which, if any, of these are present and to treat the underlying condition that may be pathogenically driving the underlying inflammatory process. Newer insights point to the genetic association of PG with autoinflammatory syndromes, including hidradenitis and acne, due to abnormalities in PSTPIPI.2
S.M. Pilkington,R.E.B. Watson
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20784
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1090-1091
The appearance of chilblain-like lesions (CLL) (‘COVID toes’) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a type I interferon (IFN) response that is present in asymptomatic and mild cases,1 but not in severe disease.2 The link between IFN signalling and CLL is supported by the occurrence of chilblains in inherited type I interferonopathies.3 Type I IFNs typically participate in the innate immune response to viral pathogens and are powerful inflammatory molecules expressed by both immune and nonimmune cells. The accumulation of double-stranded nucleic acids in the nucleus results in cytotoxic sensing by Toll-like receptors, retinoic acid-inducible gene receptors and NOD-like receptors that initiate a signalling pathway resulting in expression of IFN regulatory factors -7 and -3, inducing IFN-? and IFN-?, respectively. The IFN-? response is greater in infancy and childhood, but decreases with age,4 which may explain why CLL are more prevalent in younger individuals.
R.F.L. O’Shaughnessy
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20778
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1091-1092
Glucocorticoids are frequently used as immunosuppressive treatment in skin disease and asthma. Glucocorticoids bind to a protein called the glucocorticoid receptor in the cytoplasm of cells, which then translocates to the nucleus and binds DNA, activating transcription.1 From an epidermal standpoint glucocorticoid treatment can accelerate epidermal barrier formation,2, 3 suggesting a still not fully understood link between innate immunity and epidermal barrier function. There is also a paradoxical side-effect of glucocorticoid treatment, in that it can induce a rosacea-like disease.4 Why is it that treatment with an immunosuppressive drug can induce an immune response in the skin? This is the question that Wang et al. address in this issue of the BJD.5
Misaki Kinoshita-Ise
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20711
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1092-1093
Guidelines that clearly define a disease entity and provide details of the methods with which to assess disease severity/activity and treatment outcomes are indispensable to clinical trials/studies.
H.Y. Lee
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20753
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1093-1094
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease. Its incidence is increasing and the contemporary incidence of BP is estimated to be between 20 and 40 cases per million.1, 2 BP affects older people, and these patients are typically multimorbid with poor functional status.2, 3 The global crude 1-year death rate is 22% and the 1-year standardized mortality rate is 2·9.4 Common causes of death include infections and cardiovascular events.4, 5 Risk factors for death include age, poor function, hypoalbuminaemia, high doses of oral corticosteroids and neurological comorbidities. Death occurs predominantly within the first year of diagnosis, suggesting that both disease factors and treatment modalities may impact long-term outcomes.4 These patients are also prone to metabolic complications such as osteoporosis and hyperglycaemia.6
K. M. Hargadon
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20608
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1095-1104
B. J. Doolan,A. Onoufriadis,P. Kantaputra,J. A. McGrath
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20601
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1105-1111
D. O’Kane,C. McCourt,S. Meggitt,D.P. D’Cruz,C.H. Orteu,E. Benton,S. Wahie,S. Utton,M. Hashme,M.F. Mohd Mustapa,L.S. Exton,the British Association of Dermatologists’ Clinical Standards Unit
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20597
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1112-1123
The overall objective of the guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) in the presence or absence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in adults, young people and children. The document aims to:
A.B. Gottlieb,J.F. Merola,K. Reich,F. Behrens,P. Nash,C.E.M. Griffiths,W. Bao,P. Pellet,L. Pricop,I.B. McInnes
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20413
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1124-1134
K.A. Papp,M.G. Lebwohl,L. Puig,M. Ohtsuki,S. Beissert,J. Zeng,S. Rubant,R. Sinvhal,Y. Zhao,A.M. Soliman,G. Alperovich,C. Leonardi
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20595
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1135-1145
K. Reich,K. B. Gordon,B. E. Strober,A. W. Armstrong,M. Miller,Y. K. Shen,Y. You,C. Han,Y. W. Yang,P. Foley,C. E. M. Griffiths
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20568
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1146-1159
J.-T. Maul,M. Augustin,C. Sorbe,C. Conrad,F. Anzengruber,U. Mrowietz,K. Reich,L.E. French,M. Radtke,P. Häusermann,L.V. Maul,W.-H. Boehncke,D. Thaçi,A.A. Navarini
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20387
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1160-1168
H. Ben Abdallah,R. Bech,K. Fogh,A.B. Olesen,C. Vestergaard
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20474
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1169-1175
L. Frumholtz,J.-D. Bouaziz,M. Battistella,J. Hadjadj,R. Chocron,D. Bengoufa,H. Le Buanec,L. Barnabei,S. Meynier,O. Schwartz,L. Grzelak,N. Smith,B. Charbit,D. Duffy,N. Yatim,A. Calugareanu,A. Philippe,C.L. Guerin,B. Joly,V. Siguret,L. Jaume,H. Bachelez,M. Bagot,F. Rieux-Laucat,S. Maylin,J. Legoff,C. Delaugerre,N. Gendron,D.M. Smadja,C. Cassius,on behalf of Saint-Louis CORE (COvid REsearch)
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20707
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1176-1185
D. Westphal,M. Garzarolli,M. Sergon,P. Horak,B. Hutter,J.C. Becker,M. Wiegel,E. Maczey,S. Blum,S. Grosche-Schlee,A. Rütten,S. Ugurel,A. Stenzinger,H. Glimm,D. Aust,G. Baretton,S. Beissert,S. Fröhling,S. Redler,H. Surowy,F. Meier
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20604
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1186-1199
L. Wang,M. Yang,X. Wang,B. Cheng,Q. Ju,D.Z. Eichenfield,B.K. Sun
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20594
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1200-1208
S. Vural,K. Kerl,P. Ertop Do?an,S. Vollmer,U. Puchta,M. He,Y. Arakawa,A.O. Heper,A. Karal-Öktem,D. Hartmann,A. Boyvat,J.C. Prinz,A. Arakawa
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20643
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1209-1220
E. A. Olsen,M. Harries,A. Tosti,W. Bergfeld,U. Blume-Peytavi,V. Callender,V. Chasapi,O. Correia,G. Cotsarelis,R. Dhurat,N. Dlova,I. Doche,N. Enechukwu,R. Grimalt,S. Itami,M. Hordinsky,K. Khobzei,W. -S. Lee,S. Malakar,A. Messenger,A. McMichael,P. Mirmirani,Y. Ovcharenko,S. Papanikou,G. M. Pinto,B. M. Piraccini,R. Pirmez,P. Reygagne,J. Roberts,L. Rudnicka,D. Saceda-Corralo,J. Shapiro,T. Silyuk,R. Sinclair,R. O. Soares,A. Souissi,A. Vogt,K. Washenik,A. Zlotogorski,D. Canfield,S. Vano-Galvan
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20567
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1221-1231
V. Hébert,S. Bastos,K. Drenovska,J. Meijer,S. Ingen-Housz-Oro,C. Bedane,L. Lunardon,S. Debarbieux,H. Jedlickova,F. Caux,G. Chaby,M. D’Incan,C. Feliciani,C. Boulard,N. Schumacher,E. Schmidt,A. Roussel,M.A. Richard,J. Gottlieb,V. Ferranti,O. Guérin,J. Bénichou,P. Joly,for the French study group on autoimmune bullous skin diseases, and the autoimmune bullous skin disease task force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20593
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1232-1239
A.Y. Finlay,T.W. Griffiths,S. Belmo,M.M.U. Chowdhury
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20660
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1240-1241
C. Cassius,M. Merandet,L. Frumholtz,D. Bergerat,A. Samri,C. Grolleau,L. Grzelak,O. Schwartz,N. Yatim,P. Moghadam,L. Jaume,M. Bagot,J. Legoff,C. Delaugerre,J.-D. Bouaziz,H. Le Buanec, on behalf of Saint-Louis CORE (COvid REsearch)
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20647
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1242-1244
Dear Editor, A range of cutaneous manifestations have been described in association with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.1 Among them, chilblain-like lesions (CLL) occurred more frequently than expected. A direct link was demonstrated thanks to the visualization of viral particles in the skin endothelial cells by electron microscopy,2 which however was further questioned.3 An indirect link was highlighted with high prevalence of seropositivity in patients with CLL compared with the general population.4 However, numerous publications still question the link between CLL and SARS-CoV-2·5 Herein, we assessed this association in a cohort of 50 patients with CLL. The patients were aged 32 years (interquartile range 27–43), 29 (58%) had suggestive extracutaneous COVID-19 symptoms and 20 (40%) had been in close contact with people with confirmed COVID-19. We performed SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for direct viral assessment, SARS-CoV-2 serology for humoral response, and interferon (IFN)-? release assay for cellular T-cell response.
A. Altayeb,S. Dawood,A. Atwan,C. Mills
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20609
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1244-1245
L.L. Thompson,J. Yoon,M.S. Chang,N.J. Polyakov,C.X. Pan,S.T. Chen,E.X. Wei,A.P. Charrow
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20606
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1246-1247
V. Carmignac,G. Salomon,M. Severino-Freire,Y. Duffourd,M. Chevarin,P. Vabres,J. Mazereeuw-Hautier
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20603
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1247-1249
H. Daou,L. Gu,S.R. Lipner
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20607
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1249-1251
A. Egeberg,H. Meteran,M. Gyldenløve,C. Zachariae
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20602
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1251-1252
H. Sun,J.S. Lim,C.F. Silva,S.A. Maczuga,L.C. Hollins
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20641
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1252-1254
T.V. Jacoby,M.S. Chang,L.L. Thompson,R.K. Foreman,K.L. Reynolds,S.T. Chen
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20698
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1254-1256
M. Kim,H.E. Park,K. Han,J. Lee
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20610
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1256-1258
P. Pathmarajah,M. A. Gkini,H. Fox,V. Muralidharan,R. E. Taylor,A. Bewley
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20627
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1258-1259
T. Gambichler,S. Boms,S. Hessam,I. Tischoff,A. Tannapfel,T. Lüttringhaus,J. Beckman,R. Stranzenbach
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20630
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1259-1262
M. de Brito,B. R. Stevens,Z. Z. N. Yiu
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20663
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1262-1264
G.C. Gondo,J.F. Merola,S.J. Bell,A. Blauvelt
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20657
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1264-1265
N. C. Støer,E. Botteri,M. Busund,R. Ghiasvand,S. Vangen,E. Lund,E. Weiderpass,M.B. Veierød
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20640
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1266-1267
M. Wada-Irimada,M. Mizuashi,T. Takahashi,G. Tojo,K. Onami,K. Shido,E. Otake,S. Yusa,K. Tanita,E. Yamazaki,S. Aiba,K. Yamasaki
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20644
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1267-1269
G. Nikolakis,A. Kristandt,M. Hauptmann,M. Becker,C.C. Zouboulis
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20645
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1270-1272
Dear Editor, Antibiotics are the first-line treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), although HS is not an infectious disease.1 Certain, prolonged antibiotic courses exhibit an anti-inflammatory effect, which can be utilized to treat follicular/inflammatory skin diseases, e.g. acne and rosacea.
A.C. Procópio-Azevedo,V.B.S. Rabello,M.M. Muniz,M.H.G. Figueiredo-Carvalho,R. Almeida-Paes,R.M. Zancopé-Oliveira,J.C.A.L. Silva,P.M. de Macedo,A.C.F. Valle,M.C. Gutierrez-Galhardo,D.F.S. Freitas
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20646
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. 1272-1274
Dear Editor, Sporotrichosis is a subcutaneous mycosis that occurs worldwide and is caused by thermally dimorphic fungi of the genus Sporothrix. In 1998, sporotrichosis emerged in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil with a zoonotic profile, and since then has extended to neighbouring states and countries. Nowadays, it is considered a Neglected Tropical Disease by the World Health Organization. The Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases (INI), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ) is the main reference for the diagnosis and treatment of sporotrichosis. Lymphocutaneous, fixed cutaneous, disseminated cutaneous and extracutaneous/disseminated forms have been observed.1 Sporotrichosis-associated cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions (CHRs), such as erythema nodosum (EN), erythema multiforme (EM) and Sweet syndrome (SS), have been reported only in zoonotic transmission of the disease.2-5 Hypersensitivity lesions are sometimes mistaken for sporotrichosis lesions, which can compromise appropriate treatment.1, 6 Moreover, EN is associated with faster healing of the sporotrichosis lesions.1 We aimed to test this association in a larger sample, verify possible associations with clinical presentations, and perform molecular identification of available isolates.
C. Huffman,M.A. Cardis
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20702
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e199-e199
Dear Editor, A man in his 20s presented with a painful papule in his left medial concha that began 6 months prior (a). He noted that recently it was difficult to insert his earbuds (in-ear headphones), which he used many hours daily since transitioning to the virtual workspace (a, inset). A biopsy confirmed chondrodermatitis nodularis (b), which typically affects patients over age 40 years and involves protuberant portions of the helix or antihelix due to repeated pressure injury while sleeping.1 Given the increasing use of in-ear headphones for occupational and social engagements, chondrodermatitis nodularis may present in younger patients and in unusual locations.2
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20787
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e200-e200
Psoriasis is a chronic, scaly skin condition affecting about 2·5% of the population. It has a negative impact on people’s quality of life, more so in women. It is usually treated with creams but is sometimes severe enough to need strong medicines, which are not always effective. This study examines differences between men and women in their responses to treatment.
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20788
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e201-e201
Behçet disease (BD) is a severe chronic inflammatory disease. It damages blood vessels and can affect all organs, including the skin, eyes and brain. This can lead to blindness or even death. BD is common along the historical ‘Silk Road’, extending from Europe to the Far East, especially in Turkey. To find out what causes the disease, researchers from Turkey, Germany and Japan investigated skin lesions from patients with BD.
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20789
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e202-e202
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin disease associated with certain other diseases (comorbidities) such as inflammatory bowel and rheumatic diseases. There is little information available on this topic.
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20790
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e203-e203
Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease that needs long-term therapy to manage its symptoms (itch, tightness, burning, stinging and pain) and signs (dryness, cracking, scaling, flaking, redness and bleeding). Besides causing physical effects, psoriasis affects the quality of life of each patient (including at home/school and in relationships). Specific molecules called cytokines cause psoriasis, and certain treatments improve psoriasis by blocking these cytokines. One of these treatments, named guselkumab, blocks a cytokine called interleukin-23. Guselkumab treatment for psoriasis was studied for 5 years in two large clinical trials (VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2) with over 1800 patients in a large number of countries. Some patients received guselkumab from the beginning. Other patients switched to guselkumab after receiving another treatment – adalimumab (which blocks a different cytokine) – or placebo (which looks like the drug being tested but does not contain any medicine). Standard measures were used to determine if guselkumab would clear or nearly clear the psoriasis over 5 years.
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20791
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e204-e204
Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is one of the most common causes of permanent or scarring hair loss. This distressing condition may affect both sexes and all races, although it is most common in post-menopausal white women. The cause of this hair loss condition is unknown, although there may be a genetic susceptibility and hormonal factors may be important. The associated inflammation in the scalp occurs at the level of where the hair follicle stem cells reside, leading to permanent loss of the follicle and the hair shaft that it produces. Classically there is slowly progressive hair loss affecting the front of the scalp and the temples often with redness and scaling around the follicle openings. Some patients notice itching or burning at the involved sites. Eyebrow hair loss occurs in almost 90% of individuals and can precede the scalp hair loss. To date, treatment is usually with antinflammatory topical and systemic agents and anti-androgens but clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of each treatment are currently lacking.
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20792
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e205-e205
Eccrine porocarcinoma is a rare skin cancer of the sweat gland. It affects 0·004% of people worldwide. Unfortunately, there are no effective treatment options available for patients with eccrine porocarcinoma that has spread throughout the body. To identify new treatment strategies it is important to first understand the underlying mechanisms of how this tumour develops and progresses within the body.
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20793
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e206-e206
Chilblains are skin lesions that affect the hands and feet, and usually appear in winter. They are frequent, non-cancerous, mostly of unknown cause/spontaneous (idiopathic), sometimes painful and generally develop into flare-ups. They affect young people worldwide. Usually, there is no need for treatment.
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20794
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e207-e207
????????????????, ? 2·5% ???????????????????????, ??????????????????, ???????????????, ??????????????????????????????
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20795
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e208-e208
??? (BD) ????????????????????, ?????????, ?????????????????????????BD ?????“????”???????, ????????, ???????????????????, ??????????????????? BD ????????
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20796
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e209-e209
?????? (PG) ????????????, ??????? (???) ??, ????????????????????????
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20797
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e210-e210
???????????, ???????????? (???????????????) ??? (?????????????????) ???????????, ???????????????? (????/???????) ??????????????????, ????????????????????????????? Guselkumab, ??????????-23 ??????????????? (VOYAGE 1 ? VOYAGE 2) ???? Guselkumab ???? 1800 ?????? 5 ???????????????? Guselkumab?????????????——????? (?????????) ???????? Guselkumab????????? Guselkumab ???? 5 ????????????????????, ??????????? (> 50%), ??????????? (> 80%)???, ? Guselkumab ???? 5 ??, ?? 40% ??????????????, ?? 30% ??????????????????????????????, ?? 70% ???? VOYAGE 1 ? VOYAGE 2 ????????????????????? Guselkumab ???????????????? Guselkumab ????, ????????????????????, ?? Guselkumab ???? 5 ???????????????????????????????
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20798
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e211-e211
???????? (FFA) ?????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????????, ????????????????, ???????????????????????????????????, ??????????????, ?????????????????, ??????????????????????????????????? 90% ??????????, ???????????????, ??????????????????????, ????????????????????
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20799
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e212-e212
?????????????????????? 0·004% ?????????????, ?????????????????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????
doi : 10.1111/bjd.20800
Volume 185, Issue 6 p. e213-e213
????????????, ???????????????????, ??????????? (???) , ????, ??????????????????????????????
آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟