ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Tests/procedures for a patient with AML

Tests/procedures for a patient with AML
Tests to establish the diagnosis Additional tests/procedures at diagnosis
Complete blood count and differential count Demographics and medical history*
Bone marrow aspirate Detailed family history
Bone marrow trephine biopsyΔ Patient bleeding history
Immunophenotyping Performance status (ECOG/WHO score)
Genetic analyses Analysis of comorbidities
Cytogenetics§ Biochemistry, coagulation tests, urine analysis¥
Screening for gene mutations including: Serum pregnancy test
  • FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, NPM1, CEBPA, RUNX1, FLT3, TP53, ASXL1
Information on oocyte and sperm cryopreservation**
Screening for gene rearrangements:¶¶ Eligibility assessment for allogeneic HCT (including HLA typing)ΔΔ
  • PML-RARA, CBFB-MYH11, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, BCR-ABL1, other fusion genes (if available)
Hepatitis A, B, C; HIV-1 testing
Sensitive assessment of response by RT-qPCR or MFC◊◊ Chest radiograph, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and echocardiography or MUGA (on indication)
RT-qPCR§§,¥¥ for NPM1 mutation, CBFB-MYH11, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, BCR-ABL1, other fusion genes (if available)◊◊ Lumbar puncture‡‡
Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC)¥¥,†† Biobanking***

AML: acute myeloid leukemia; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; WHO: World Health Organization; HIV-1: human immunodeficiency type 1; CMV: cytomegalovirus; RT-qPCR: real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; MFC: multiparameter flow cytometry; MUGA: multigated acquisition; MRD: minimal residual disease; CNS: central nervous system.

* Including race or ethnicity, prior exposure to toxic agents, prior malignancy, therapy for prior malignancy, information on smoking.

¶ Thorough family history needed to identify potential myeloid neoplasms with germline predisposition.

Δ In patients with a dry tap (punctio sicca).

◊ History of bleeding episodes may inform cases of myeloid neoplasms with germline predisposition and preexisting platelet disorders.

§ Results from cytogenetics should be obtained preferably within 5 to 7 days. At least 20 bone marrow metaphases are needed to define a normal karyotype and recommended to describe an abnormal karyotype. Abnormal karyotypes may be diagnosed from blood specimens.

¥ Biochemistry: Glucose, sodium, potassium, calcium, creatinine, aspartate amino transferase, alanine amino transferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, bilirubin, urea, total protein, uric acid, total cholesterol, total triglycerides, creatinine phosphokinase. Coagulation tests: Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio where indicated, activated partial thromboplastin time. Urine analysis: pH, glucose, erythrocytes, leukocytes, protein, nitrite.

‡ Results from NPM1 and FLT3 mutational screening should be available within 48 to 72 hours (at least in patients eligible for intensive chemotherapy), and results from additional molecular genetics within the first treatment cycle. Screening for gene mutations is an evolving field of research; screening for single genes may be replaced by gene panel diagnostics.

† In patients with childbearing potential.

** Cryopreservation to be done in accordance with the wish of the patient.

¶¶ Screening for gene rearrangements should be performed if rapid information is needed for recommendation of suitable therapy, if chromosome morphology is of poor quality, or if there is typical morphology but the suspected cytogenetic abnormality is not present.

ΔΔ HLA typing and CMV testing should be performed in those patients eligible for allogeneic HCT.

◊◊ Sensitive assessment of response can be performed at early time points; for example, following induction and consolidation courses to assess remission status and determine kinetics of disease response, and sequentially beyond consolidation to detect impending morphologic relapse. No generally applicable time points can be defined because kinetics of MRD response differs by treatment given, marker analyzed, and method used.

§§ Monitoring of response by RT-qPCR recommended in clinical trials and clinical practice.

¥¥ Sensitivity of response assessment varies by method used, and by marker tested; test used and sensitivity of the assay should always be reported; analyses should be done in experienced laboratories (centralized diagnostics).

‡‡ Required in patients with clinical symptoms suspicious of CNS involvement; patient should be evaluated by imaging study for intracranial bleeding, leptomeningeal disease, and mass lesion; lumbar puncture considered optional in other settings (eg, high white blood cell count).

†† Increasing evidence that response assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry qualitatively provides a better remission status than morphologic assessment and is of high prognostic impact.

*** Pretreatment leukemic bone marrow and blood sample.
Adapted with permission from: Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 2017; 129:424. Copyright © 2017 American Society of Hematology.
Graphic 112198 Version 4.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟