ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Anticoagulant sodium citrate (Regional citrate anticoagulant): Drug information

Anticoagulant sodium citrate (Regional citrate anticoagulant): Drug information
2024© UpToDate, Inc. and its affiliates and/or licensors. All Rights Reserved.
For abbreviations, symbols, and age group definitions show table
Brand Names: US
  • TriCitrasol
Pharmacologic Category
  • Anticoagulant
Dosing: Adult

Note: 4% trisodium citrate has a sodium content of 408 mmol/L. To avoid severe hypernatremia, protocols typically employ lower sodium dialysate and/or replacement fluids and titrate accordingly (Ref). Refer to institutional protocols.

Regional anticoagulation for CRRT circuit

Regional anticoagulation for CRRT circuit (off-label use): Note: Must only be prescribed and administered by trained personnel, as standardized (and often specialized) dialysate and/or replacement fluids and titration and monitoring protocols are required (Ref). Citrate solution is administered through the inflow (prefilter or “arterial”) limb of the extracorporeal CRRT circuit, not administered directly to the patient (Ref). Due to the loss of citrate-calcium complexes in dialysis effluent, calcium repletion must be administered at the end of the dialysis circuit or IV through a separate central line to avoid hypocalcemia (Ref). Safety: Avoid or use with extreme caution and special protocols in patients with impaired citrate clearance (eg, hyperacute liver failure [ie, within 7 days] with blood transaminase >1,000 units/L or cardiogenic shock with blood lactate concentrations >8 mmol/L) (Ref).

Example regimen:

Initial infusion rate (in mL/hour): Intracircuit: Use a 4% trisodium citrate dihydrate solution: Approximate usual initial infusion rate: ~1 to 1.5 times the blood flow rate; for example, if blood flow rate is 100 to 200 mL/minute, start infusion at 100 to 300 mL/hour (Ref). Optimal 4% trisodium regimens have not been identified; refer to institutional protocols as variations exist. Adjustment of 4% trisodium citrate and calcium infusion rates is dependent on established protocols and ionized calcium concentrations.

CRRT calcium: Monitor ionized calcium concentrations in outflow (postfilter) limb of the CRRT circuit; maintain CRRT circuit iCa between 1 to 1.6 mg/dL (0.25 to 0.4 mmol/L) (Ref).

Serum calcium: Monitor systemic iCa concentration peripherally (drawn directly from the patient) and maintain systemic iCa between 3.6 to 4.8 mg/dL (0.9 to 1.2 mmol/L) (Ref).

Adverse Reactions

The following adverse drug reactions and incidences are derived from product labeling unless otherwise specified.

Frequency not defined:

Cardiovascular: Cardiac arrhythmia, chest pressure, hypotension

Central nervous system: Chills, paresthesia, tingling in the lips, tingling of extremities

Gastrointestinal: Stomach cramps

Contraindications

Do not administer to a patient by direct IV infusion.

Warnings/Precautions

Disease-related concerns:

• Hepatic impairment: Use with caution in patients with liver impairment. Citrate is partially metabolized by the liver and may accumulate with hepatic impairment leading to toxicity. When used for regional anticoagulation of the CRRT circuit, anticoagulant sodium citrate is considered relatively contraindicated in patients with hyperacute liver failure (ie, within 7 days) with blood transaminase values >1,000 units/L; however, if necessary, may be used with close monitoring and appropriate adjustments (Davenport 2024; Meersch 2018; Szamosfalvi 2020).

• Shock states: Use with caution in patients with shock and hypoperfusion; may accumulate with hypoperfusion/shock states leading to toxicity. When used for regional anticoagulation of the CRRT circuit, anticoagulant sodium citrate is considered relatively contraindicated in patients with cardiogenic shock with blood lactate concentrations >8 mmol/L (Davenport 2024).

Dosage Forms: US

Excipient information presented when available (limited, particularly for generics); consult specific product labeling.

Concentrate, In Vitro:

TriCitrasol: 46.7% (30 mL)

Solution, In Vitro:

Generic: 4% (250 mL, 500 mL)

Generic Equivalent Available: US

May be product dependent

Pricing: US

Concentrate (TriCitrasol In Vitro)

46.7% (per mL): $0.30

Solution (Anticoagulant Sodium Citrate In Vitro)

4% (per mL): $0.05

Disclaimer: A representative AWP (Average Wholesale Price) price or price range is provided as reference price only. A range is provided when more than one manufacturer's AWP price is available and uses the low and high price reported by the manufacturers to determine the range. The pricing data should be used for benchmarking purposes only, and as such should not be used alone to set or adjudicate any prices for reimbursement or purchasing functions or considered to be an exact price for a single product and/or manufacturer. Medi-Span expressly disclaims all warranties of any kind or nature, whether express or implied, and assumes no liability with respect to accuracy of price or price range data published in its solutions. In no event shall Medi-Span be liable for special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising from use of price or price range data. Pricing data is updated monthly.

Dosage Forms: Canada

Excipient information presented when available (limited, particularly for generics); consult specific product labeling.

Liquid, In Vitro:

Generic: 4% (250 mL)

Solution, In Vitro:

Generic: 4% (250 mL)

Use: Labeled Indications

Anticoagulant:

Concentrate (triCitrasol): Anticoagulant used in granulocytapheresis procedures

Solution: Anticoagulant for use with cytapheresis device only

Use: Off-Label: Adult

Regional anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy circuit

Medication Safety Issues
Sound-alike/look-alike issues:

Anticoagulant sodium citrate may be confused with anticoagulant citrate dextrose

Metabolism/Transport Effects

None known.

Drug Interactions

There are no known significant interactions.

Monitoring Parameters

When used for regional anticoagulation of the CRRT circuit: Monitor serum electrolytes ~15 minutes and 1 hour after starting CRRT, then at least every 6 hours for CRRT; particularly monitor iCa, sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium, and bicarbonate to avoid metabolic abnormalities; acid-base balance; anion gap; for CRRT monitor total body calcium at least once daily to calculate the calcium ratio (total calcium/iCa) (calcium ratio may indicate citrate toxicity if >2.1); monitoring post-filter iCa may be beneficial to ensure adequate anticoagulation of the dialysis circuit (Davenport 2024; KDIGO 2012).

Citrate overload or accumulation may be managed by decreasing the blood flow rate (which decreases citrate requirements), increasing the dialysate rate (CVVHD) or the filtration rate (CVVH) to increase removal, or decreasing the targeted citrate concentration within the filter (Schneider 2017). In cases where adjustments do not rapidly correct accumulation, regional citrate anticoagulation should be discontinued and replaced with alternative circuit anticoagulation (Davenport 2024; Schneider 2017).

Mechanism of Action

Citrate ions induce anticoagulation by chelating free ionized calcium, making it unavailable for use in the coagulation system.

Brand Names: International
International Brand Names by Country
For country code abbreviations (show table)

  • (CZ) Czech Republic: Natrium citricum;
  • (GB) United Kingdom: Trav sodium citrate;
  • (HU) Hungary: Natrium citricum;
  • (LT) Lithuania: Natrium citricum;
  • (LV) Latvia: Natrium citricum;
  • (PL) Poland: Natrium citricum;
  • (UA) Ukraine: Natrium citricum
  1. Anticoagulant Sodium Citrate 4% w/v solution, USP [prescribing information]. Union, SC: CSL Plasma Inc; June 2021.
  2. Assefi M, Leurent A, Blanchard F, et al. Impact of increasing post-filter ionized calcium target on filter lifespan in renal replacement therapy with regional citrate anticoagulation: a before-and-after study. J Crit Care. 2023;78:154364. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154364 [PubMed 37379797]
  3. Betjes MG, van Oosterom D, van Agteren M, van de Wetering J. Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation during venovenous hemofiltration in patients at low risk for bleeding: similar hemofilter survival but significantly less bleeding. J Nephrol. 2007;20(5):602-608. [PubMed 17918147]
  4. Clark JA, Schulman G, Golper TA. Safety and efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation during 8-hour sustained low-efficiency dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(3): 736-742. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03460807. [PubMed 18272829]
  5. Davenport A. Anticoagulation for continuous kidney replacement therapy. Connor RF, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. http://www.uptodate.com. Accessed May 1, 2024.
  6. Gattas DJ, Rajbhandari D, Bradford C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of regional citrate versus regional heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill adults. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(8):1622-1629. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001004. [PubMed 25853591]
  7. Hetzel GR, Schmitz M, Wissing H, et al. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin for anticoagulation in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofiltration: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(1):232-239. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq575. [PubMed 20876598]
  8. Kellum JA, Aspelin P, Barsoum RS, et al. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(1):8-12. https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/KDIGO-2012-AKI-Guideline-English.pdf. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.7. [PubMed 25018916]
  9. Kutsogiannis DJ, Mayers I, Chin WD, Gibney RT. Regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35(5):802-811. [PubMed 10793012]
  10. Kutsogiannis DJ, Gibney RT, Stollery D, Gao J. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement in critically ill patients. Kidney Int. 2005;67(6):2361-2367. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00342.x. [PubMed 15882280]
  11. Meersch M, Zarbock A. Renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: who, when, why, and how. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(2):151-157. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000564. [PubMed 29324487]
  12. Mitchell A, Daul AE, Beiderlinden M, et al. A new system for regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Clin Nephrol. 2003;59(2):106-114. doi: 10.5414/cnp59106. [PubMed 12608553]
  13. Monchi M, Berghmans D, Ledoux D, et al. Citrate vs. heparin for anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a prospective randomized study. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(2):260-265. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2047-x. [PubMed 14600809]
  14. Morabito S, Pistolesi V, Tritapepe L, Fiaccadori E. Regional citrate anticoagulation for RRTs in critically ill patients with AKI. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(12):2173-2188. doi:10.2215/CJN.01280214. [PubMed 24993448]
  15. Morgera S, Schneider M, Slowinski T, et al. A safe citrate anticoagulation protocol with variable treatment efficacy and excellent control of the acid-base status. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(6):2018-2024. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a00a92. [PubMed 19384210]
  16. Morgera S, Scholle C, Melzer C, et al. A simple, safe and effective citrate anticoagulation protocol for the Genius dialysis system in acute renal failure. Nephron Clin Pract. 2004;98(1):c35-c40. doi:10.1159/000079925. [PubMed 15361702]
  17. Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Bosman RJ, Koopmans M, et al. Citrate anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(2):545–552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181953c5e. [PubMed 19114912]
  18. Schilder L, Nurmohamed SA, Bosch FH, et al; CASH study group. Citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparinisation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Crit Care. 2014;18(4):472. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0472-6. [PubMed 25128022]
  19. Schneider AG, Journois D, Rimmelé T. Complications of regional citrate anticoagulation: accumulation or overload? Crit Care. 2017;21(1):281. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1880-1 [PubMed 29151020]
  20. Slowinski T, Morgera S, Joannidis M, et al. Safety and efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemodialysis in the presence of liver failure: the Liver Citrate Anticoagulation Threshold (L-CAT) observational study. Crit Care. 2015;19:349. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1066-7. [PubMed 26415638]
  21. Sodium citrate 250 mL and 500 mL [prescribing information]. Lake Zurich, IL: Fenwal Inc; February 2013.
  22. Stucker F, Ponte B, Tataw J, et al. Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2015;19:91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0822-z. [PubMed 25881975]
  23. Szamosfalvi B, Puri V, Sohaney R, et al. Regional citrate anticoagulation protocol for patients with presumed absent citrate metabolism. Kidney360. 2020;2(2):192-204. doi:10.34067/KID.0005342020 [PubMed 35373034]
  24. triCitrasol (trisodium citrate dihydrate) [prescribing information]. Braintree, MA: Citra Labs; May 2017.
  25. Zarbock A, Küllmar M, Kindgen-Milles D, et al; RICH Investigators and the Sepnet Trial Group. Effect of regional citrate anticoagulation vs systemic heparin anticoagulation during continuous kidney replacement therapy on dialysis filter life span and mortality among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(16):1629-1639. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.18618 [PubMed 33095849]
Topic 115978 Version 38.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟