ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : -2 مورد

Differentiating constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy

Differentiating constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy
Parameter Favors constrictive pericarditis Favors restrictive cardiomyopathy
Echocardiography
Interventricular septal shift (bounce) Present Absent
Inspiratory fall in mitral E velocity* ≥14.6% <14.6% (usually <10%)
Hepatic venous flow Ratio of expiratory diastolic reversal velocity to systolic forward velocity ≥0.79 Inspiratory diastolic flow reversal
Medial e' ≥8 cm/s <8 cm/s
Medial e'/lateral e'Δ ≥0.88 <0.88
Absolute global longitudinal strain >16% ≤10%
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Relative atrial volume ratio (LA/RA volume) ≥1.32 ≤1.32
Pericardial thickness >4 mm Normal
Pericardial motion Tethered pericardium on tagged CMR Normal pericardial motion
Late gadolinium enhancement Enhancement of the pericardium Characteristic enhancement pattern for some causes of RCM (eg, amyloidosis, sarcoidosis)
Ventricular interdependence (cine CMR maximal septal respiratory excursion) >11% <8%
Cardiac computed tomography
Pericardial thickness and appearance

>4 mm

Pericardium may be calcified
≤4 mm (generally <3 mm)
Contrast enhancement Pericardial enhancement may be identified No pericardial enhancement
LV and RV walls   LV and RV wall thicknesses may be normal or increased
Nuclear imaging
FDG-PET Uptake may be present, particularly with TB pericarditis Uptake with sarcoidosis
Technetium-99m-pyrophosphate scintigraphy   Uptake with transthyretin amyloidosis
Cardiac catheterization parameters
Respiratory change in LV and RV pressures§ Discordant Concordant
RAP/PCWP ratio >0.77 ≤0.77
CP and RCM are 2 causes of diastolic dysfunction that can be challenging to distinguish because they have overlapping clinical features. Both conditions are generally associated with an expiratory mitral E/A ratio >1 and a dilated inferior vena cava. This table summarizes key test findings that distinguish these 2 conditions. Since pericardial thickness is not reliably assessed by echocardiography, pericardial thickness is generally assessed by CMR or cardiac CT.

BNP: B-type natriuretic peptide; CMR: cardiovascular magnetic resonance; CP: constrictive pericarditis; CT: computed tomography; E: early diastolic filling; e': early mitral annular velocity; FDG-PET: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; IVRT: isovolumic relaxation time; LA: left atrial; LV: left ventricular; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; RA: right atrial; RAP: right atrial pressure; RCM: restrictive cardiomyopathy; RV: right ventricular; TB: tuberculous.

* LV filling velocity is driven by the gradient between LA and LV diastolic pressure. When LA pressure is greatly elevated in a patient with CP, respiratory variation in ventricular filling may not be observed, whereas patients with lower LA pressure (ie, due to volume depletion or earlier stage of disease) may have more noticeable changes in ventricular filling velocities with respiration. The ability to assess respirophasic changes in filling velocities is challenging in patients with atrial fibrillation due to the presence of variable cardiac cycle length from beat to beat.

¶ In patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, the cutoff for medial e' velocity is ≥11 cm/s rather than ≥8 cm/s.

Δ Mitral lateral (and tricuspid lateral) annular e' velocities are commonly reduced in patients with CP while e' velocities of the medial annulus are preserved (termed "annulus reversus"). This discrepancy between lateral and medial e' velocities is not generally observed in RCM.

◊ The pericardium is thickened in most patients with CP. However, a minority of patients with CP do not have thickened pericardium, so the presence of normal pericardial thickness does not exclude CP.

§ In patients with CP, there is an increase in aortic ejection time and a decrease in pulmonic ejection time with expiration, so the difference between aortic ejection time and pulmonic ejection time increases. In patients without CP, with expiration, aortic ejection time is generally unchanged, while the pulmonic ejection fraction is unchanged or may increase slightly, so the difference between aortic ejection time and pulmonic ejection time is unchanged or decreases slightly.
References:
  1. Lloyd JW, Anavekar NS, Oh JK, Miranda WR. Multimodality imaging in differentiating constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: A comprehensive overview for clinicians and imagers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2023; 36:1254.
  2. Diaz-Arocutipa C, Chumbiauca M, Medina HM, et al. Echocardiographic criteria to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis. CJC Open 2023; 5:680.
  3. Alajaji W, Xu B, Sripariwuth A, et al. Noninvasive multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2018; 11:e007878.
  4. Welch TD, Ling LH, Espinosa RE, et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis: Mayo Clinic criteria. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7:526.
Graphic 126665 Version 3.0