ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Group prenatal care

Group prenatal care
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Jun 08, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Prenatal care has traditionally consisted of one-on-one visits with a clinical provider(s) that occurs at specific time intervals throughout pregnancy. However, other models may offer patients and providers acceptable care alternatives. Group prenatal care, in which a small cohort of pregnant patients with similar due dates participate in a structured prenatal care program facilitated by a clinician, is one such alternative model of prenatal care delivery. It was developed on the premise that some types of health care are more effectively and efficiently provided in this way. Group prenatal care also provides a peer group for psychosocial support, which may reduce stress and isolation during the life changing process of pregnancy and birth.

This topic will focus on the structure, outcomes, and patient selection for group prenatal care. Specific components of prenatal care are discussed separately.

(See "Prenatal care: Initial assessment".)

(See "Prenatal care: Second and third trimesters".)

(See "Prenatal care: Patient education, health promotion, and safety of commonly used drugs".)

CANDIDATES — Group prenatal care was initially designed to meet the needs of low-risk nulliparous and multiparous patients who successfully completed the first trimester. As experience with the initial model accrued, it was successfully offered to wider patient populations, including patients with human immunodeficiency virus, gestational diabetes, substance use, and past preterm deliveries [1,2]. Groups have also been conducted for teens [3,4], incarcerated individuals [1], individuals in the military [5], individuals in resource-limited settings [6,7], and for patients whose preferred language is different from the local language [6,7].

The optimal characteristics of candidates for group prenatal care have not been clearly defined [8]. The model appears to be ideal for pregnant patients who are seeking more active participation, enhanced information, and more social connection during pregnancy [4]. It may be particularly beneficial for patients in high-stress or low-support environments. However, to benefit from group care, the individual needs to have the developmental and communication skills to participate in discussion-based care. For some individuals (eg, patients with behavioral or psychiatric disorders), the loose group structure can be difficult for productive participation.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) considers group prenatal care a reasonable alternative to traditional prenatal care, but patients should be allowed to choose between these approaches [9]. The most commonly cited reasons for not electing group care are scheduling conflicts [10], childcare issues, lack of transportation, and a strong personal relationship with a specific nonparticipating provider.

MODELS — While specific group prenatal care models exist, no data are available regarding the optimal model for providing group care. The most publicized model is CenteringPregnancy, which replaces traditional prenatal care with all group visits and incorporates education, social support, and self-care [11]. Other less-studied models consist of blended models of group and traditional care, group educational and social support as an adjunct to traditional care, and group prenatal care augmented by social media [12-14].

As defined by the CenteringPregnancy program, group prenatal care contains three components: health care, interactive learning, and community building, all of which occur within a single space. The model is defined by 13 essential elements that provide its structure [11]:

Health assessment occurs within the group space

Patient involvement in self-care activities

Facilitative leadership style is used

Each session has an overall plan

Attention is given to the core content, but emphasis can vary

Stability of group leadership

Group conduct honors the contribution of each member

Group is conducted in a circle

Group composition is stable, but not rigid

Group size is optimal to promote the process

Involvement of support people is optional

Opportunity for socializing within the group is provided

There is ongoing evaluation of outcomes

Two important factors in the success of this approach are maintaining both process fidelity (the strategies and skill, particularly facilitative leadership, for delivering the intervention) and content fidelity (provision of all 13 elements of the intervention) [15].

COMPONENTS

Routine prenatal visits — The group prenatal care model traditionally brings together 8 to 12 patients with low-risk pregnancies at similar gestational ages for prenatal care and facilitated discussion and learning sessions. The facilitators and clinicians are generally the same for all the sessions. After each patient has had an initial, individual prenatal visit, the cohort moves through prenatal care and milestones together as they meet over 8 to 10 visits, each visit lasting approximately 90 to 120 minutes [16].

The first part of each session typically includes the standard maternal and fetal assessments. The group prenatal care model encourages patients to be involved in their own care; in some programs, the patients measure and record their blood pressure and weight and calculate their gestational age. Data collection can be done with the assistance or supervision of a nurse or medical assistant. Routine physical assessments, such as fundal height and fetal heart rate, are often performed in a semiprivate area of the group space by one of the clinicians. This semiprivate portion of the visit also allows the provider and patient to discuss any concerns that should be addressed outside of the group context.

Before or after the standard maternal and fetal assessments, multiple patients can meet with nutritionists, counselors, and other such providers, as appropriate.

In the second portion of each session, group prenatal care clinicians and facilitators address routine prenatal care issues appropriate for the gestational age of the participants in a group format and provide facilitative leadership during a question and discussion period. The facilitator emphasizes the critical role that inclusive and engaged discussion plays in improving clinical outcomes [15]. Partners or support members can be included in the group, if desired by the participants. (See "Prenatal care: Initial assessment" and "Prenatal care: Second and third trimesters" and "Prenatal care: Patient education, health promotion, and safety of commonly used drugs".)

Additional questions or needs of any patient, such as laboratory evaluations, can be addressed once the group has finished its discussion. At the end of each session the check-out process is simplified because all the group meetings can be scheduled in advance, typically at the first session.

Patients who develop complications — For patients in whom a pregnancy complication develops, the same triage process is used as patients in traditional care models. Patients are referred to specialists, such as a Maternal-Fetal Medicine provider, as needed. When possible, the patient is given the option of continuing routine care with her group and adding specialist visits as needed.

Postpartum and pediatric care — Group sessions can extend into the postpartum period and beyond, where they also incorporate well-child care and parenting [17]. Pediatric providers are included in the team [18]. Ideally, the patients continue their postnatal care with their original prenatal cohort and expand on the interactive learning and community building that occurred during pregnancy [19]. Key focus areas are follow-up of prenatal medical issues, setting and achievement of weight goals, depression screening and treatment, contraception, breastfeeding support, safe sleep, and screening for violence [19].

ADVANTAGES — Group prenatal care offers several advantages compared with traditional care models [5,20]. These advantages contribute to the increased satisfaction reported by patients receiving group care. (See 'Outcomes' below.)

For patients:

All participants get the benefit of hearing answers to questions they did not think to ask.

Group support can help individuals achieve goals that would be unattainable or more difficult to obtain by the individual alone (eg, smoking cessation).

Participants meet each other, create a community, and share learning and skill development.

Communication can be improved by hosting the sessions in the same language that is natively spoken by the participants.

Being in a circle of other participants provides support for the sharing of issues, such as domestic violence, that are difficult to discuss in a relatively short one-to-one visit.

For care providers:

Answering questions in a group format is more efficient than repeatedly discussing the same information individually.

Clinicians have an opportunity to hear patients' suggestions for strategies for dealing with common problems in culturally appropriate ways.

For the practice:

The group model creates efficiencies by concentrating resources within the group space: Fewer examination rooms are needed for prenatal care, and personnel (eg, translators, nutritionists, genetic counselors, nurses) can serve multiple patients at one time.

The model can be used to provide prenatal care in resource-limited settings [7,21].

The model allows flexibility in design that adjusts to the specific needs of different populations.

While the group model can decrease patient wait times and increase efficiency across the practice, cost savings depend on the specific setting [22,23]. One study that evaluated a financial model of group prenatal care for an urban underserved practice reported cost neutrality and potential cost savings; the outcome varied with the number of clinicians staffing a session [21]. Because billing practices for group care vary among states and insurers, this model may not be universally applicable.

DISADVANTAGES — Potential disadvantages include a lack of flexibility in scheduling visits. Group prenatal care visits are generally prescheduled at consistent times. If a visit is missed, the patient can schedule an appointment with an individual provider, if necessary; however, it is not possible to review all the material covered in the missed group discussion. Also, because of the length of group visits (90 to 120 minutes), which is considerably longer than the traditional obstetric visit, it may be a challenge for working mothers and patients with childcare issues, as it is likely impractical and potentially disruptive for patients to bring along their young children.

Other potential disadvantages are some loss of privacy, the loss of a strong personal relationship with a particular provider, the need to feel comfortable listening and speaking in a group setting, and loss of cost-effectiveness if individual visits also need to be scheduled to address more acute issues.

OUTCOMES — The group prenatal care model has demonstrated success worldwide [7,24-26]. Compared with traditional prenatal care, group prenatal care seems to provide a richer, more satisfying experience for the participants [6,16,22,24,25,27,28].

However, evidence of improved obstetric outcomes is more modest [16,29-33]. In a systematic review of four trials including a total of 1800 patients, those receiving group compared with traditional prenatal care had similar rates of preterm birth, low birth weight infants, small for gestational age infants, and perinatal mortality [16]. In a subsequent randomized trial including 2350 participants, those receiving group compared with traditional care also had similar rates of preterm birth and low birth weight infants [34].

By contrast, group prenatal care has been associated with stress reduction [35,36] and increases in achieving appropriate gestational weight gain and loss [3,37,38], attendance at prenatal and postpartum care appointments [22,39], breastfeeding initiation [3,22,27,40], and postpartum diabetes screening [41]. While initiation of postpartum contraception may be higher in those attending group compared with traditional prenatal care [3,39,42], at least one study reported similar rates of contraceptive use at 12 weeks postpartum [43].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: General prenatal care".)

SUMMARY

General principles – Group prenatal care, in which a small cohort of individuals with similar due dates participate in a structured prenatal care program facilitated by a clinician, is an alternative model of prenatal care delivery. It is built on the premise that some types of health care are more effectively and efficiently provided in groups that are facilitated rather than taught. (See 'Introduction' above.)

Candidates – The group care model appears ideal for patients who are seeking more active participation, enhanced information, and more social connection during pregnancy. They need to have the developmental and communication skills to participate in discussion-based care; thus, it is not the best care model for all patients. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) considers group prenatal care a reasonable alternative to traditional prenatal care, but patients should be allowed to choose between these approaches. (See 'Candidates' above.)

Components

Prenatal visits – The group prenatal care model traditionally brings together 8 to 12 low-risk pregnant patients with pregnancies at similar gestational ages for prenatal care. After each patient has had an initial individual prenatal visit, the cohort moves through prenatal care together as they meet over 8 to 10 visits, each visit lasting approximately 90 to 120 minutes and consisting of both standard maternal and fetal assessments and facilitated discussion and learning sessions. (See 'Routine prenatal visits' above.)

Patients with complications – For patients in whom a pregnancy complication develops, the same triage process is used as patients in traditional care models. Patients are referred to specialists, such as a Maternal-Fetal Medicine provider, as needed. When possible, the patient is given the option of continuing routine care with her group and adding specialist visits as needed.

Postpartum care – The prenatal group and their infants can continue the group after delivery and add pediatric providers. (See 'Postpartum and pediatric care' above.)

Advantages – Advantages of group prenatal care include hearing answers to questions they did not think to ask, developing relationships among participants who have a common experience, sharing learning and skill development, developing the support of a community, and possibly motivating other participants to change behavior. (See 'Advantages' above.)

Disadvantages – Potential disadvantages include a lack of flexibility in scheduling visits, long duration of visits, some loss of privacy, the loss of a strong personal relationship with a particular provider, and the need to feel comfortable listening and speaking in a group setting. (See 'Disadvantages' above.)

Outcomes – Rates of preterm birth, low birth weight infants, small for gestational age infants, and perinatal mortality appear to be similar to those receiving traditional prenatal care. However, group prenatal care seems to provide a richer, more satisfying experience for the participants. (See 'Outcomes' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Sharon Schindler Rising, MSN, CNM, FACNM, who contributed to earlier versions of this topic review.

  1. Rising SS, Jolivet R. Circles of community: the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model. In: Birth models that work, Davis-Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss BA, Tritten J (Eds), University of California Press, Berkeley and London 2009. p.365.
  2. Kershaw TS, Magriples U, Westdahl C, et al. Pregnancy as a window of opportunity for HIV prevention: effects of an HIV intervention delivered within prenatal care. Am J Public Health 2009; 99:2079.
  3. Trotman G, Chhatre G, Darolia R, et al. The Effect of Centering Pregnancy versus Traditional Prenatal Care Models on Improved Adolescent Health Behaviors in the Perinatal Period. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28:395.
  4. Weber Yorga KD, Sheeder JL. Which Pregnant Adolescents Would be Interested in Group-Based Care, and Why? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2015; 28:508.
  5. Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, et al. A randomized clinical trial of group prenatal care in two military settings. Mil Med 2011; 176:1169.
  6. Little SH, Motohara S, Miyazaki K, et al. Prenatal group visit program for a population with limited English proficiency. J Am Board Fam Med 2013; 26:728.
  7. Jafari F, Eftekhar H, Fotouhi A, et al. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes of group versus individual prenatal care: a new experience in Iran. Health Care Women Int 2010; 31:571.
  8. Sheeder J, Weber Yorga K, Kabir-Greher K. A review of prenatal group care literature: the need for a structured theoretical framework and systematic evaluation. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16:177.
  9. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 731: Group Prenatal Care. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131:e104. Reaffirmed 2022.
  10. Tilden EL, Hersh SR, Emeis CL, et al. Group prenatal care: review of outcomes and recommendations for model implementation. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2014; 69:46.
  11. Rising SS, Kennedy HP, Klima CS. Redesigning prenatal care through CenteringPregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004; 49:398.
  12. Lathrop B, Pritham UA. A pilot study of prenatal care visits blended group and individual for women with low income. Nurs Womens Health 2014; 18:462.
  13. Gabbe PT, Reno R, Clutter C, et al. Improving Maternal and Infant Child Health Outcomes with Community-Based Pregnancy Support Groups: Outcomes from Moms2B Ohio. Matern Child Health J 2017; 21:1130.
  14. Cunningham SD, Lewis JB, Thomas JL, et al. Expect With Me: development and evaluation design for an innovative model of group prenatal care to improve perinatal outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:147.
  15. Novick G, Reid AE, Lewis J, et al. Group prenatal care: model fidelity and outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:112.e1.
  16. Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M, et al. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD007622.
  17. Bialostozky A, McFadden SE, Barkin S. A Novel Approach to Well-Child Visits for Latino Children under Two Years of Age. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2016; 27:1647.
  18. Picklesimer A, Heberlein E, Covington-Kolb S. Group prenatal care: has its time come? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58:380.
  19. Bloomfield J, Rising SS. CenteringParenting: an innovative dyad model for group mother-infant care. J Midwifery Womens Health 2013; 58:683.
  20. Massey Z, Rising SS, Ickovics J. CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care: Promoting relationship-centered care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006; 35:286.
  21. Rowley RA, Phillips LE, O'Dell L, et al. Group Prenatal Care: A Financial Perspective. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20:1.
  22. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, et al. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:330.
  23. Mooney SE, Russell MA, Prairie B, et al. Group prenatal care: an analysis of cost. J Health Care Finance 2008; 34:31.
  24. Teate A, Leap N, Rising SS, Homer CS. Women's experiences of group antenatal care in Australia--the CenteringPregnancy Pilot Study. Midwifery 2011; 27:138.
  25. Brock E, Charlton KE, Yeatman H. Identification and evaluation of models of antenatal care in Australia--a review of the evidence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 54:300.
  26. Patil CL, Abrams ET, Klima C, et al. CenteringPregnancy-Africa: a pilot of group antenatal care to address Millennium Development Goals. Midwifery 2013; 29:1190.
  27. Grady MA, Bloom KC. Pregnancy outcomes of adolescents enrolled in a CenteringPregnancy program. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004; 49:412.
  28. Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, et al. "I wasn't alone"--a study of group prenatal care in the military. J Midwifery Womens Health 2009; 54:176.
  29. Shakespear K, Waite PJ, Gast J. A comparison of health behaviors of women in centering pregnancy and traditional prenatal care. Matern Child Health J 2010; 14:202.
  30. Robertson B, Aycock DM, Darnell LA. Comparison of centering pregnancy to traditional care in Hispanic mothers. Matern Child Health J 2009; 13:407.
  31. Wedin K, Molin J, Crang Svalenius EL. Group antenatal care: new pedagogic method for antenatal care--a pilot study. Midwifery 2010; 26:389.
  32. Andersson E, Christensson K, Hildingsson I. Mothers' satisfaction with group antenatal care versus individual antenatal care--a clinical trial. Sex Reprod Healthc 2013; 4:113.
  33. Carter EB, Temming LA, Akin J, et al. Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:551.
  34. Crockett AH, Chen L, Heberlein EC, et al. Group vs traditional prenatal care for improving racial equity in preterm birth and low birthweight: the Centering and Racial Disparities randomized clinical trial study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:893.e1.
  35. Ickovics JR, Reed E, Magriples U, et al. Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: results from a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Health 2011; 26:235.
  36. Heberlein EC, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, et al. The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016; 19:259.
  37. Tanner-Smith EE, Steinka-Fry KT, Gesell SB. Comparative effectiveness of group and individual prenatal care on gestational weight gain. Matern Child Health J 2014; 18:1711.
  38. Magriples U, Boynton MH, Kershaw TS, et al. The impact of group prenatal care on pregnancy and postpartum weight trajectories. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:688.e1.
  39. Heberlein E, Smith J, Willis C, et al. The effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on postpartum visit attendance and contraception use. Contraception 2020; 102:46.
  40. Tanner-Smith EE, Steinka-Fry KT, Lipsey MW. Effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on breastfeeding outcomes. J Midwifery Womens Health 2013; 58:389.
  41. Mazzoni SE, Hill PK, Webster KW, et al. Group prenatal care for women with gestational diabetes (.). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29:2852.
  42. Hale N, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, Covington-Kolb S. The impact of Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care on postpartum family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:50.e1.
  43. Olatunde A, Hosein S, Paoletti A, et al. Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Contraceptive Use at Twelve Weeks Postpartum. Matern Child Health J 2022; 26:1559.
Topic 14182 Version 33.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟