ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : -40 مورد

Intraoperative one-lung ventilation

Intraoperative one-lung ventilation
Authors:
Martin Ma, MD
Peter D Slinger, MD, FRCPC
Section Editor:
Roberta Hines, MD
Deputy Editor:
Nancy A Nussmeier, MD, FAHA
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: Apr 25, 2025.

INTRODUCTION — 

In most patients requiring mechanical ventilation, both lungs are inflated and deflated together. One-lung ventilation (OLV) refers to mechanical separation of the lungs to allow ventilation of only one lung. OLV is a standard approach to facilitate surgical exposure for thoracic surgeries and may be used to isolate a pathologic lung from a healthy one to prevent soiling or to provide differential ventilation.

This topic will discuss the general principles and physiology of OLV, its management, and its complications. Devices used for OLV, their placement, and comparative performance are reviewed separately. (See "Techniques to achieve lung isolation during general anesthesia".)

INDICATIONS — 

OLV is used either to improve exposure to the surgical field in thoracic surgery or to anatomically isolate one lung from a pathologic process of the other lung [1].

Surgical exposure — A non-ventilated, collapsed lung improves the view of the thoracic cavity and access to structures in the surgical field. OLV is often used during:

Pulmonary resection, including pneumonectomy, lobectomy, and wedge resection (see "Anesthesia for open pulmonary resection", section on 'Airway control')

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), including wedge resection, biopsy, and pleurodesis (see "Anesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary resection", section on 'Airway management and surgical bronchoscopy')

Mediastinal surgery (see "Anesthesia for patients with an anterior mediastinal mass", section on 'Airway management')

Esophageal surgery (see "Anesthesia for esophagectomy and other esophageal surgery", section on 'Considerations for one lung ventilation')

Thoracic vascular surgery (see "Anesthesia for open descending thoracic aortic surgery", section on 'Induction and airway management')

Thoracic spine surgery (see "Anesthesia for elective spine surgery in adults", section on 'Airway management')

Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery (see "Minimally invasive aortic and mitral valve surgery")

Lung isolation — Lung isolation may be necessary to:

Avoid cross-contamination from one lung to the other in the following circumstances (see "Techniques to achieve lung isolation during general anesthesia"):

Pulmonary hemorrhage (see "Evaluation and management of life-threatening hemoptysis")

Purulent pulmonary secretions

During whole lung lavage for pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [2] (see "Treatment and prognosis of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in adults", section on 'Whole lung lavage')

Decrease pressure or airflow on the side of pathology, as in bronchopleural fistula or unilateral cyst/bullae (see "Bronchopleural fistula in adults" and "Overview of pulmonary resection", section on 'Pulmonary blebs and bullae')

CONTRAINDICATIONS — 

Contraindications to OLV include dependence on bilateral mechanical ventilation. Patients with severe pulmonary disease or prior pulmonary resection may not tolerate OLV; in these cases, selective lobar blockade may be an option.

Placement of a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) may not be technically possible in a patient with an intraluminal airway mass restricting access to the tracheobronchial tree, and may be inadvisable if the intraluminal mass could be dislodged during placement since this could cause complete airway obstruction.

PHYSIOLOGY — 

The clinician using OLV needs to understand the changes in physiology caused by differential ventilation of the two lungs.

During normal two lung ventilation, ventilation and perfusion are well matched anatomically, because dependent portions of the lungs receive both greater blood flow (a result of gravity) and greater ventilation (from gravitational effects on lung compliance). The initiation of OLV stops all ventilation to one lung, which would create a 50 percent right-to-left shunt and relative hypoxemia if perfusion were unchanged. However, the actual shunt fraction is usually only 20 to 30 percent for the following reasons [3]:

Surgical manipulation of the atelectatic lung obstructs vascular flow to the non-ventilated lung.

Most patients undergoing thoracic surgery are in the lateral decubitus position. Lateral positioning of the patient leads to a gravitational increase in perfusion to the dependent, ventilated lung. The ventilated dependent lung is within the closed side of the chest and is exposed to the weight of the contralateral hemithorax contents. These factors result in an increase in lung elastance and the power delivered by the mechanical ventilator, even though tidal volume (TV) is reduced during OLV [4].

Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) modulates the blood flow to hypoxic regions of the lungs [5,6]. HPV reduces shunt flow through the nonventilated lung by 40 to 50 percent during OLV, moderating the degree of hypoxemia [7,8]. Alveolar hypoxia triggers the pulmonary vessels to constrict, directing blood away from poorly/nonventilated areas to better-ventilated segments, thereby improving ventilation/perfusion matching. Clinically, HPV is proportional to the degree of local hypoxia, and is triggered primarily in response to an alveolar oxygen tension less than 100 mmHg [8]. The onset of HPV is two-phase with an initial rapid onset phase (minutes) and a delayed phase (hours). When oxygenation and ventilation are re-established, the attenuation of HPV follows a reverse two-phase pattern and may not completely return to normal for several hours [7]. This is an important consideration in the case of bilateral sequential thoracic procedures, such as bilateral wedge resections for lung metastases, in which patients tend to desaturate more during the OLV of the second lung.

A number of anesthetic factors may influence the extent of HPV, some of which may be controlled by the management of the anesthetic.

HPV is potentiated (causing less shunt, improving oxygenation) by [8]:

Metabolic and respiratory acidosis

Hypercapnia

Mild decreased mixed venous oxygenation

Hyperthermia

HPV is decreased (causing increased shunt, worsening oxygenation) by:

Metabolic and respiratory alkalosis

Hypocapnia

Hypothermia

Increased left atrial pressure

Administration of a volatile inhalation anesthetic at a dose >1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)

Hemodilution

IMPROVING DEFLATION OF THE NONVENTILATED LUNG — 

After placement of a lung isolation device to achieve OLV, expedited deflation of the nonventilated lung improves surgical access. One or more of the following maneuvers may help improve collapse of the nonventilated lung (table 1):

Denitrogenate both lungs by ventilating with either 100 percent oxygen (O2) or a nitrous oxide (N2O)/O2 mixture for several minutes prior to initiating OLV [9]. Replacing the poorly absorbed nitrogen in the nonventilated lung with more soluble O2 or N2O will facilitate collapse [10].

Apply low suction (20 cmH2O) until the nonventilated lung has collapsed well [11]. Low suction also prevents passive entrainment of air into the nonventilated lung [12].

With a dual-lumen tube (DLT), low suction is applied via a suction catheter placed into the endotracheal lumen that leads to the nonventilated lung. (See "Techniques to achieve lung isolation during general anesthesia".)

With a bronchial blocker, low suction is applied via the suction channel lumen. When a bronchial blocker is used, disconnect the anesthetic circuit and allow a prolonged expiration for 20 to 30 seconds, or until the end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) falls to zero. Then begin OLV after inflating the cuff of the bronchial blocker under direct vision with the flexible intubating scope [10,13]. (See "Techniques to achieve lung isolation during general anesthesia", section on 'Placement of bronchial blockers'.)

Use pressure-controlled ventilation during OLV to avoid the peaks in airway pressure that may occur during volume-controlled ventilation (eg, due to surgical manipulation in the chest or patient coughing). This decreases the chance of inadvertent reinflation of the nonventilated lung due to gas being forced past the inflated cuff of the DLT or bronchial blocker device.

LUNG-PROTECTIVE VENTILATION STRATEGIES DURING OLV — 

Thoracic surgery with OLV can result in a spectrum of lung injuries ranging from mild to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [14-18]. The incidence of clinically overt acute lung injury (ALI) following lung resection generally ranges from 2 to 4 percent [19-22]. However, the incidence is higher after larger resections and is 8 to 12 percent after pneumonectomy [20,23]. Mortality in patients with ALI is approximately 40 percent [8,24]. (See "Ventilator-induced lung injury".)

Protective lung ventilation strategies during controlled ventilation under general anesthesia are used to minimize the risk of lung injury during both two lung ventilation and OLV. These strategies were adapted from approaches used in patients with ARDS in the critical care setting. The goal of protective ventilation is to minimize ventilator-induced lung trauma, inflammation, and injury due to alveolar over-distension and cyclic atelectasis while maintaining adequate oxygenation. Further discussion is available in a separate topic. (See "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Lung protective ventilation during anesthesia'.)

Low tidal volume (TV) ventilation — During protective OLV, a TV of 4 to 6 mL/kg is used. For comparison, historically, TV of 8 to 10 mL/kg was used during OLV as well as two lung ventilation.

Evidence from randomized trials and meta-analyses suggest that lower TV strategies decrease the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications [25,26]. A 2023 meta-analysis noted that lower TVs of 4 to 7 mL/kg during OLV were associated with a decreased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (including abnormal chest radiograph, pneumonia atelectasis, infiltrates, pleural effusion, ALI, or ARDS), compared with higher TVs of 8 to 15 mL/kg (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.68; 10 trials with 1076 patients) [25]. Lower TV ventilation was also associated with a significantly higher arterial oxygen tension (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio 15 minutes after the start of OLV (mean difference 33.7 mmHg) and at the end of surgery (mean difference 18.59 mmHg), and a lower incidence of arrhythmias (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87). Hospital length of stay (LOS) did not differ [25].

Permissive hypercapnia — Use of low TVs without compensatory increases in respiratory rate (RR) leads to hypercapnia (see "Permissive hypercapnia during mechanical ventilation in adults"). This seems to be well-tolerated, and may be advantageous in OLV.

Hypercapnia potentiates hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) [27], and causes a rightward shift of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve, enhancing oxygen delivery to tissue and thus, potentially improving wound healing and reducing infectious complications [28]. However, the benefits of hypercapnia must be balanced against the potential for increased intracranial pressure, pulmonary hypertension, myocardial depression, and decreased kidney perfusion. Hypercapnia (to 64 mmHg) during OLV was well tolerated in one trial, although it was associated with a 42 percent increase in pulmonary vascular resistance [29]. In two other series with higher levels of hypercapnia, patients tended to require inotropic support [30,31].

Many patients undergoing surgical procedures that require lung isolation OLV have significant preexisting pulmonary disease and may develop a large arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) to end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) gradient during OLV. Once OLV is established, we obtain an arterial blood gas to assess the magnitude of the gradient and to ensure ventilation is sufficient.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level — PEEP of 5 to 10 cmH2O is typically applied during OLV with low TVs to prevent atelectasis. Details and evidence are discussed in a separate topic. (See "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Positive end-expiratory pressure' and "Overview of initiating invasive mechanical ventilation in adults in the intensive care unit", section on 'Positive end-expiratory pressure'.)

During OLV, equivalent or improved oxygenation and lower inflammatory markers have been noted with use of PEEP (5 to 10 cmH2O) with low TV (5 to 7 mL/kg) during OLV, compared with larger TV (9 to 15 mL/kg) without PEEP [32-34]. Use of PEEP also reduces injury from the mechanical stress of repetitive inflation/deflation cycles in the alveoli, which may lead to hypoxia and inflammation [35]. However, excessive PEEP >10 cm H2O during OLV may shift perfusion away from the ventilated lung, resulting in increased shunt [36,37].

In patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease (low forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]), extrinsic PEEP should be used with caution. These patients may have high levels of intrinsic auto PEEP, which can cause incomplete expiration and significant air trapping [38-42]. The addition of extrinsic PEEP can worsen alveolar distension, increase pulmonary vascular resistance within the ventilated lung, increase shunting of blood flow to the non-ventilated lung, and worsen hypoxia. (See "Anesthesia for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", section on 'Mechanical ventilation' and "Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)", section on 'Intrinsic (auto) PEEP'.)

During OLV, most patients develop some level of auto-PEEP that is inversely correlated to the severity of coexisting obstructive pulmonary disease [43]. In one trial, either 10 cmH2O PEEP or no PEEP was employed during OLV; PEEP improved oxygenation and lung compliance only in patients without obstructive disease [38]. In a series of 42 patients having OLV with 10 mL/kg TV, addition of PEEP 5 cmH2O improved oxygenation in 14 percent and worsened oxygenation in 21 percent, with no change in 65 percent [39]. Patients most likely to benefit were those with normal spirometry and low levels of intrinsic auto-PEEP.

Low airway pressures — Either pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) or volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) may be selected, with the goal of avoiding high airway pressures and preventing barotrauma. Two crossover studies during OLV demonstrated improved oxygenation and shunt fraction with PCV compared with VCV, especially in patients with poor preoperative lung function [44,45]. This may be because PCV provides a more homogeneous distribution of TV, thus improving oxygenation and dead space ventilation [46]. Two other trials were unable to demonstrate any improvement in oxygenation, although they did have lower airway pressures with PCV [47,48]. (See "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Modes of intraoperative mechanical ventilation' and "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Plateau pressure'.)

No prospective trials have demonstrated improved outcomes when ventilation is specifically managed to lower airway pressures. Since plateau airway pressures >35 cmH2O are associated with pulmonary barotrauma, maintaining plateau inspiratory pressures <30 cmH2O is a reasonable goal. Two observational studies in patients undergoing OLV found an association between ventilation at higher airway pressures with development of postoperative ALI, but whether this is a causative effect or simply an early marker for lung injury is unclear [19,49]. (See "Diagnosis, management, and prevention of pulmonary barotrauma during invasive mechanical ventilation in adults".)

Oxygen concentration — Patients should be ventilated with the minimum FiO2 needed to maintain oxygen saturation >90 percent (see "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Fraction of inspired oxygen'). If desaturation occurs while lower oxygen concentrations are used, increases in FiO2 should be temporary while measures are taken to remedy the cause of the problem. (See 'Treatment of hypoxemia' below.)

Potentially preventable hyperoxemia and substantial oxygen exposure are common during OLV [50,51]. A high FiO2 causes absorption atelectasis in the ventilated lung, increasing shunt and worsening oxygenation [52]. Furthermore, hyperoxia produces toxic oxygen free radicals, though the threshold above which oxygen toxicity and acute lung injury occur is unknown [53]. Re-expansion of the collapsed lung after OLV worsens this oxidative stress, resulting in increased vascular permeability and alveolar-capillary membrane edema, while re-expansion using low FiO2 may mitigate any damage [54]. In one propensity score-weighted analysis that included 2936 patients, 74 percent received median intraoperative FiO2 >80 percent [51]. This was associated with impaired postoperative oxygenation compared with those who received lower median intraoperative FiO2 (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.6-2.1).

MANAGEMENT OF HYPOXEMIA — 

The incidence of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation less than 90 percent) during OLV is approximately 5 percent [3,55]. Most commonly, this results from shunting.

Predicting hypoxemia during OLV — Several factors predict an increased likelihood of hypoxemia during OLV [3,56-59]:

Low arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) prior to OLV

Left-sided ventilation (due to the smaller left lung) compared with right-sided ventilation

High forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), which results in minimal auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and higher potential for atelectasis

Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2

Supine compared with lateral positioning (see 'Physiology' above)

Treatment of hypoxemia — Management of hypoxemia depends on the acuity of the situation. For severe acute hypoxemia, re-expansion of the non-ventilated lung may be necessary. However, since re-expansion of the lung would interfere with the surgical procedure if the onset is gradual, a series of other maneuvers are attempted first.

Episodes that occur suddenly or are associated with oxygen (O2) saturation <90 percent are particularly concerning. In these situations, immediate treatment includes (table 2) [59]:

Increasing the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to 100 percent.

Resuming two-lung ventilation temporarily if oxygen saturation does not rapidly rise to >90 percent on 100 percent FiO2.

Once the oxygen saturation improves, the following additional maneuvers should be performed (table 2):

Evaluate the position of the lung isolation device (double-lumen endotracheal tube or bronchial blocker). A flexible intubating scope (FIS) should be used to check the lung isolation device and reposition it as necessary. In one large series, lung isolation device malpositioning (often caused by changes in patient position or surgical manipulation) was responsible for 60 percent of hypoxic episodes during OLV [55].

Suction the ventilated lung. Occlusion of major bronchi by secretions or blood may be diagnosed and suctioned using a FIS. For thick secretions and blood, suction with an endotracheal catheter may be needed.

Optimize cardiac output. Many patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring OLV have poor cardiopulmonary reserve. Exacerbation of low cardiac output may occur due to hypovolemia, pump failure, or increases in pulmonary vascular resistance due to hypercapnia or dynamic hyperinflation. (See 'Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level' above.)

If hypoxemia persists after these maneuvers, the use of other ventilation strategies are attempted in the following order:

Use recruitment maneuvers before, during, and after OLV to re-expand alveoli, improve oxygenation, decrease shunting, and decrease dead space. Such maneuvers include short periods of higher airway pressure and larger tidal volume (TV) to re-expand atelectatic lung tissue [60-66]. However, these recruitment maneuvers can cause lung injury in animal models; therefore, use is weighed against risks of atelectasis [67,68]. (See "Mechanical ventilation during anesthesia in adults", section on 'Recruitment maneuvers'.)

Increase PEEP to the ventilated lung up to 10 cmH2O to minimize atelectasis and improve oxygenation, especially if low TVs are being used. Exercise caution in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [63-65,69]. (See 'Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level' above.)

Deliver O2 to the non-ventilated lung

Insufflate a low flow of O2 (3 L/min) to the non-ventilated lung via a suction catheter inserted into the lumen of the double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) before restarting OLV to decrease the incidence of subsequent hypoxemia. It is unclear if the beneficial effect is primarily due to absorption of the insufflated oxygen, or due to prevention of the passive entrainment of room air into the non-ventilated lung [70].

Apply O2 via continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) 5 to 10 cmH2O to the nonventilated lung to reduce shunt fraction of the nonventilated lung [71]. The surgeon should be informed before initiating CPAP since this maneuver can cause sudden movement in the surgical field, and the partial inflation of the operative lung worsens surgical exposure.

Use high-frequency jet ventilation to the nonventilated lung as an alternative to CPAP to improve oxygenation and decrease shunt [72].

Use partial ventilation of the operative lung:

Employ selective lobar collapse

Insufflate O2/CPAP selectively into the nonoperative lobe(s) of the operative lung via a bronchial blocker or FIS [35]. (See "Techniques to achieve lung isolation during general anesthesia".)

Intermittently resume two-lung ventilation as needed, although this usually requires interruption of the surgical procedure [59].

Manually restrict pulmonary blood flow via surgical manipulation to decrease shunting through the non-ventilated lung [73].

Use nebulized prostacyclin or its derivative iloprost in the ventilated lung to treat hypoxemia during OLV, particularly if a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) technique is employed [74]. Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) as a pulmonary vasodilator could theoretically increase perfusion of the ventilated lung and thus minimize shunt, but this agent did not improve oxygenation in clinical trials [75-77].

ANESTHETIC CHOICE — 

There is insufficient evidence that the choice of anesthetic type (inhalation versus intravenous) affects oxygenation during OLV, or the incidence of lung injury; therefore, the decision to use inhalation and/or intravenous anesthetics should be based on standard considerations unrelated to OLV [3]. The impact of thoracic epidural use during general anesthesia on oxygenation and shunt during OLV has been inconsistent, and should not change the management plan. [78-82].

RE-EXPANDING THE NONVENTILATED LUNG — 

Except in the case of pneumonectomy, re-expansion of the nonventilated lung is necessary following completion of the surgical procedure. This is accomplished with a sustained inflation at low levels of positive airway pressure (eg, 20 to 30 cmH2O for 10 to 15 seconds). Higher pressures (>30 cmH2O) are avoided due to reduce the risk of acute lung injury or and the risk of new air leaks after pulmonary resection. (See 'Low airway pressures' above.)

Such gently sustained inflations may be repeated to reinflate all atelectatic areas. If pulmonary resection was performed, sustained inflations also allow detection of bronchial air leaks. When feasible, expansion is accomplished with direct observation of the lung in an open chest or on the monitor during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). This ensures gradual but complete recruitment of residual lung tissue with the application of the minimum sustained positive pressure that is necessary.

Subsequently, two lung ventilation is managed with a protective ventilation strategy and the minimum fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) that maintains oxygen saturation >93 percent. (See 'Lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV' above.)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Indications for OLV Ventilation of a single lung while allowing the other to collapse is known as one-lung ventilation (OLV). Indications for OLV include (see 'Indications' above):

Surgical exposure during thoracic surgery

Isolation of one lung from the other for the treatment of pulmonary pathology

Contraindications for OLV Contraindications include dependence on bilateral mechanical ventilation, and intraluminal airway masses that restrict access to the tracheobronchial tree. (See 'Contraindications' above.)

Physiology of OLV Physiologic changes caused by differential ventilation of the two lungs include ventilation/perfusion mismatch and hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. (See 'Physiology' above.)

Deflating the nonventilated lung After placement of a lung isolation device, expedited deflation of the nonventilated lung to improve surgical access can be achieved by one or more maneuvers (table 1). (See 'Improving deflation of the nonventilated lung' above.)

Lung-protective ventilation strategies During OLV, protective ventilation minimizes lung injury while maintaining oxygenation. We suggest using the following combination of ventilation strategies to the ventilated single lung (Grade 2C) (see 'Lung-protective ventilation strategies during OLV' above):

Low tidal volume (TV) ventilation (4 to 6 mL/kg)

Permissive hypercapnia is well-tolerated in most patients, and may be advantageous during OLV. However, patients with significant pre-existing pulmonary disease may develop a large arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) to end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) gradient during OLV. An arterial blood gas is obtained once OLV is initiated

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; 5 to 10 cmH2O), except in patients with severe obstructive disease

Limit airway pressures (plateau inspiratory pressures <30 cmH2O), or pressure-controlled ventilation

Lower fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), adjust as needed to maintain oxygen saturation >90 percent

Management of hypoxemia during OLV Increase FiO2 to 100 percent. If this is not effective, temporarily resume two lung ventilation to increase oxygen saturation to >90 percent, and then perform the maneuvers outlined in the table (table 2). (See 'Treatment of hypoxemia' above.)

Anesthetic choices – Decisions to use inhalation and/or intravenous anesthetics should be based on standard considerations unrelated to OLV. (See 'Anesthetic choice' above.)

Re-expanding the nonventilated lung Re-expansion is necessary to reinflate all atelectatic areas of the nonventilated lung and detect bronchial air leaks. This is accomplished with a sustained inflation at low levels of positive airway pressure (eg, 20 to 30 cmH2O for 10 to 15 seconds), which may be repeated for optimal recruitment of lung tissue. Higher pressures (>30 cmH2O) are avoided due to the risk of exacerbation of acute lung injury or the creation of new air leaks after pulmonary resection. (See 'Re-expanding the nonventilated lung' above.)

  1. Cohen E. Current Practice Issues in Thoracic Anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2021; 133:1520.
  2. Smith BB, Torres NE, Hyder JA, et al. Whole-lung Lavage and Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis: Review of Clinical and Patient-centered Outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:2453.
  3. Karzai W, Schwarzkopf K. Hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation: prediction, prevention, and treatment. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:1402.
  4. Chiumello D, Formenti P, Bolgiaghi L, et al. Body Position Alters Mechanical Power and Respiratory Mechanics During Thoracic Surgery. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:391.
  5. Lagier D, Zeng C, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Vidal Melo MF. Perioperative Pulmonary Atelectasis: Part II. Clinical Implications. Anesthesiology 2022; 136:206.
  6. Royster RL, Johnson SD, Krupp ND, Sullivan TP. Radiographic Demonstration of Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction during One-lung Ventilation. Anesthesiology 2022; 137:733.
  7. Sylvester JT, Shimoda LA, Aaronson PI, Ward JP. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Physiol Rev 2012; 92:367.
  8. Lohser J. Evidence-based management of one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 26:241.
  9. Ko R, McRae K, Darling G, et al. The use of air in the inspired gas mixture during two-lung ventilation delays lung collapse during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:1092.
  10. Yoshimura T, Ueda K, Kakinuma A, et al. Bronchial blocker lung collapse technique: nitrous oxide for facilitating lung collapse during one-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker. Anesth Analg 2014; 118:666.
  11. Narayanaswamy M, McRae K, Slinger P, et al. Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: a randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:1097.
  12. Pfitzner J, Peacock MJ, McAleer PT. Gas movement in the nonventilated lung at the onset of single-lung ventilation for video-assisted thoracoscopy. Anaesthesia 1999; 54:437.
  13. Bussières JS, Somma J, Del Castillo JL, et al. Bronchial blocker versus left double-lumen endotracheal tube in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial examining time and quality of lung deflation. Can J Anaesth 2016; 63:818.
  14. Lohser J, Slinger P. Lung Injury After One-Lung Ventilation: A Review of the Pathophysiologic Mechanisms Affecting the Ventilated and the Collapsed Lung. Anesth Analg 2015; 121:302.
  15. Slinger PD. Do Low Tidal Volumes Decrease Lung Injury During One-Lung Ventilation? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:1774.
  16. Licker M, Fauconnet P, Villiger Y, Tschopp JM. Acute lung injury and outcomes after thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22:61.
  17. Della Rocca G, Coccia C. Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2013; 26:40.
  18. Eichenbaum KD, Neustein SM. Acute lung injury after thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 24:681.
  19. Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A, et al. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1558.
  20. Dulu A, Pastores SM, Park B, et al. Prevalence and mortality of acute lung injury and ARDS after lung resection. Chest 2006; 130:73.
  21. Alam N, Park BJ, Wilton A, et al. Incidence and risk factors for lung injury after lung cancer resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84:1085.
  22. Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, et al. Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2:1007.
  23. Jeon K, Yoon JW, Suh GY, et al. Risk factors for post-pneumonectomy acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome in primary lung cancer patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37:14.
  24. Gothard J. Lung injury after thoracic surgery and one-lung ventilation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006; 19:5.
  25. El Tahan MR, Samara E, Marczin N, et al. Impact of Lower Tidal Volumes During One-Lung Ventilation: A 2022 Update of the Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:1983.
  26. Peel JK, Funk DJ, Slinger P, et al. Tidal volume during 1-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 163:1573.
  27. Balanos GM, Talbot NP, Dorrington KL, Robbins PA. Human pulmonary vascular response to 4 h of hypercapnia and hypocapnia measured using Doppler echocardiography. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2003; 94:1543.
  28. Lytle FT, Brown DR. Appropriate ventilatory settings for thoracic surgery: intraoperative and postoperative. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 12:97.
  29. Sticher J, Müller M, Scholz S, et al. Controlled hypercapnia during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing pulmonary resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45:842.
  30. Zollinger A, Zaugg M, Weder W, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic volume reduction surgery in patients with diffuse pulmonary emphysema: gas exchange and anesthesiological management. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:845.
  31. Morisaki H, Serita R, Innami Y, et al. Permissive hypercapnia during thoracic anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43:845.
  32. Michelet P, D'Journo XB, Roch A, et al. Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:911.
  33. Wrigge H, Uhlig U, Zinserling J, et al. The effects of different ventilatory settings on pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses during major surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98:775.
  34. Végh T, Juhász M, Szatmári S, et al. Effects of different tidal volumes for one-lung ventilation on oxygenation with open chest condition and surgical manipulation: a randomised cross-over trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2013; 79:24.
  35. Grichnik KP, Shaw A. Update on one-lung ventilation: the use of continuous positive airway pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation--clinical application. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22:23.
  36. Hedenstierna G. Pulmonary perfusion during anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. Minerva Anestesiol 2005; 71:319.
  37. Leong LM, Chatterjee S, Gao F. The effect of positive end expiratory pressure on the respiratory profile during one-lung ventilation for thoracotomy. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:23.
  38. Valenza F, Ronzoni G, Perrone L, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure applied to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with high FEV1. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21:938.
  39. Slinger PD, Kruger M, McRae K, Winton T. Relation of the static compliance curve and positive end-expiratory pressure to oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology 2001; 95:1096.
  40. Slinger PD, Hickey DR. The interaction between applied PEEP and auto-PEEP during one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12:133.
  41. Bardoczky GI, d'Hollander AA, Cappello M, Yernault JC. Interrupted expiratory flow on automatically constructed flow-volume curves may determine the presence of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:880.
  42. Inomata S, Nishikawa T, Saito S, Kihara S. "Best" PEEP during one-lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78:754.
  43. Yokota K, Toriumi T, Sari A, et al. Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation using a double-lumen endobronchial tube. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:1007.
  44. Tuğrul M, Camci E, Karadeniz H, et al. Comparison of volume controlled with pressure controlled ventilation during one-lung anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79:306.
  45. Sentürk NM, Dilek A, Camci E, et al. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilatory and oxygenation parameters during pressure-controlled one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 19:71.
  46. Nichols D, Haranath S. Pressure control ventilation. Crit Care Clin 2007; 23:183.
  47. Unzueta MC, Casas JI, Moral MV. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:1029.
  48. Pardos PC, Garutti I, Piñeiro P, et al. Effects of ventilatory mode during one-lung ventilation on intraoperative and postoperative arterial oxygenation in thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23:770.
  49. van der Werff YD, van der Houwen HK, Heijmans PJ, et al. Postpneumonectomy pulmonary edema. A retrospective analysis of incidence and possible risk factors. Chest 1997; 111:1278.
  50. Suzuki S, Mihara Y, Hikasa Y, et al. Current Ventilator and Oxygen Management during General Anesthesia: A Multicenter, Cross-sectional Observational Study. Anesthesiology 2018; 129:67.
  51. Choi A, Deng H, Fuller M, et al. Intraoperative FiO2 and risk of impaired postoperative oxygenation in lung resection: A propensity score-weighted analysis. J Clin Anesth 2025; 101:111739.
  52. Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, et al. Influence of gas composition on recurrence of atelectasis after a reexpansion maneuver during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:832.
  53. Jordan S, Mitchell JA, Quinlan GJ, et al. The pathogenesis of lung injury following pulmonary resection. Eur Respir J 2000; 15:790.
  54. Cheng YJ, Chan KC, Chien CT, et al. Oxidative stress during 1-lung ventilation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132:513.
  55. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Left double-lumen tubes: clinical experience with 1,170 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17:289.
  56. Slinger P, Suissa S, Triolet W. Predicting arterial oxygenation during one-lung anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39:1030.
  57. Bardoczky GI, Szegedi LL, d'Hollander AA, et al. Two-lung and one-lung ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the effects of position and F(IO)2. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:35.
  58. Chobola M, Homolka P, Benej M, et al. Ventilatory Efficiency Identifies Patients Prone to Hypoxemia During One-Lung Ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:1956.
  59. Cowan J, Hutton M, Owen A, et al. Cognitive Aids for the Management of Thoracic Anesthesia Emergencies: Consensus Guidelines on Behalf of a Canadian Thoracic Taskforce. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:2719.
  60. Tusman G, Böhm SH, Sipmann FS, Maisch S. Lung recruitment improves the efficiency of ventilation and gas exchange during one-lung ventilation anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2004; 98:1604.
  61. Cinnella G, Grasso S, Natale C, et al. Physiological effects of a lung-recruiting strategy applied during one-lung ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008; 52:766.
  62. Unzueta C, Tusman G, Suarez-Sipmann F, et al. Alveolar recruitment improves ventilation during thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:517.
  63. Campos JH, Feider A. Hypoxia During One-Lung Ventilation-A Review and Update. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2330.
  64. Ferrando C, Mugarra A, Gutierrez A, et al. Setting individualized positive end-expiratory pressure level with a positive end-expiratory pressure decrement trial after a recruitment maneuver improves oxygenation and lung mechanics during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg 2014; 118:657.
  65. iPROVE Network investigators, Belda J, Ferrando C, Garutti I. The Effects of an Open-Lung Approach During One-Lung Ventilation on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Driving Pressure: A Descriptive, Multicenter National Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2665.
  66. Choi YS, Bae MK, Kim SH, et al. Effects of Alveolar Recruitment and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Oxygenation during One-Lung Ventilation in the Supine Position. Yonsei Med J 2015; 56:1421.
  67. Koh WJ, Suh GY, Han J, et al. Recruitment maneuvers attenuate repeated derecruitment-associated lung injury. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:1070.
  68. Suh GY, Koh Y, Chung MP, et al. Repeated derecruitments accentuate lung injury during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:1848.
  69. Pereira SM, Tucci MR, Morais CCA, et al. Individual Positive End-expiratory Pressure Settings Optimize Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation and Reduce Postoperative Atelectasis. Anesthesiology 2018; 129:1070.
  70. Jung DM, Ahn HJ, Jung SH, et al. Apneic oxygen insufflation decreases the incidence of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation in open and thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 154:360.
  71. Fujiwara M, Abe K, Mashimo T. The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure on the oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation with propofol anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2001; 13:473.
  72. Abe K, Oka J, Takahashi H, et al. Effect of high-frequency jet ventilation on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic aneurysm surgery. J Anesth 2006; 20:1.
  73. Ishikawa S, Nakazawa K, Makita K. Progressive changes in arterial oxygenation during one-lung anaesthesia are related to the response to compression of the non-dependent lung. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:21.
  74. Kim N, Lee SH, Joe Y, et al. Effects of Inhaled Iloprost on Lung Mechanics and Myocardial Function During One-Lung Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Combined With Poor Lung Oxygenation. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:1407.
  75. Schwarzkopf K, Klein U, Schreiber T, et al. Oxygenation during one-lung ventilation: the effects of inhaled nitric oxide and increasing levels of inspired fraction of oxygen. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:842.
  76. Rocca GD, Passariello M, Coccia C, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide administration during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001; 15:218.
  77. Wilson WC, Kapelanski DP, Benumof JL, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide (40 ppm) during one-lung ventilation, in the lateral decubitus position, does not decrease pulmonary vascular resistance or improve oxygenation in normal patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11:172.
  78. Casati A, Mascotto G, Iemi K, et al. Epidural block does not worsen oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for lung resections under isoflurane/nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22:363.
  79. Ozcan PE, Sentürk M, Sungur Ulke Z, et al. Effects of thoracic epidural anaesthesia on pulmonary venous admixture and oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51:1117.
  80. Garutti I, Quintana B, Olmedilla L, et al. Arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation: combined versus general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:494.
  81. Xu Y, Tan Z, Wang S, et al. Effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia with different concentrations of ropivacaine on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology 2010; 112:1146.
  82. El-Tahan MR. Role of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery and Its Perioperative Effects. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:1417.
Topic 14945 Version 40.0

References