ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Pathophysiology and etiology of edema in adults

Pathophysiology and etiology of edema in adults
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Mar 08, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Edema is defined as a palpable swelling produced by expansion of the interstitial fluid volume. A variety of clinical conditions are associated with the development of edema, including heart failure, cirrhosis, and the nephrotic syndrome (table 1).

Some patients have localized edema. This can be caused by a variety of conditions, including venous obstruction, as occurs with deep vein thrombosis or venous stasis, and allergic reactions (such as laryngeal edema).

This topic will review the pathophysiology and etiology of generalized edematous states. The clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and therapy of edema are discussed separately:

(See "Clinical manifestations and evaluation of edema in adults".)

(See "General principles of the treatment of edema in adults".)

(See "Causes and treatment of refractory edema in adults".)

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF EDEMA FORMATION — There are two basic steps involved in edema formation:

An alteration in capillary hemodynamics that favors the movement of fluid from the vascular space into the interstitium

The retention of dietary or intravenously administered sodium and water by the kidneys

The importance of the kidneys in the development of edema should not be underestimated. Edema (other than localized edema as with an allergic reaction) does not become clinically apparent until the interstitial volume has increased by at least 2.5 to 3 liters. Since the normal plasma volume is only approximately 3 liters, it is clear that patients would develop marked hemoconcentration and shock if the edema fluid were derived only from the plasma.

Hemoconcentration and shock do not occur, because of the following sequence:

The initial movement of fluid from the vascular space into the interstitium reduces the plasma volume and consequently reduces tissue perfusion.

In response to these changes, the kidney retains sodium and water.

Some of this fluid stays in the vascular space, returning the plasma volume toward normal. However, the alteration in capillary hemodynamics results in most of the retained fluid entering the interstitium and eventually becoming apparent as edema.

The net effect is a marked expansion of the total extracellular volume (as edema) with maintenance of the plasma volume at closer-to-normal levels. This pathophysiologic sequence also illustrates an important point that must be considered when treating a patient with edema. Renal sodium and water retention in most edematous states is an appropriate compensation in that it restores tissue perfusion, even though it also augments the degree of edema. Removing the edema fluid with diuretic therapy will improve symptoms due to edema but may diminish tissue perfusion, occasionally to clinically significant levels. (See "General principles of the treatment of edema in adults".)

The hemodynamic effects are different when the primary abnormality is inappropriate renal fluid retention. In this setting, both the plasma and interstitial volumes are expanded, and deleterious hemodynamic effects from removal of the excess fluid are much less likely. This is an example of overfilling of the vascular tree which most often occurs with primary kidney disease.

Capillary hemodynamics — The exchange of fluid between the plasma and the interstitium is determined by the hydraulic and oncotic pressures in each compartment. The relationship between these parameters has traditionally been described by Starling's law [1,2]:

 Net filtration  =  LpS  x  (Delta hydraulic pressure - Delta oncotic pressure)

                     =  LpS  x  [(Pcap - Pif) - s(ecap - eif)]

where Lp is the unit permeability (or porosity) of the capillary wall, S is the surface area available for fluid movement, Pcap and Pif are the capillary and interstitial fluid hydraulic pressures, ecap and eif are the capillary and interstitial fluid oncotic pressures, and s represents the reflection coefficient of proteins across the capillary wall (with values ranging from 0 if completely permeable to 1 if completely impermeable).

Classically, it had been assumed and taught that outward filtration predominates at the arterial end of the capillary, while, in the venule, as hydrostatic pressure falls, fluid returns to the capillary from the interstitium, driven by the oncotic pressure gradient. However, subsequent observations have shown that, in most capillary beds, net filtration continues throughout the length of the capillary, and that many of the assumptions of the Starling relationship are invalid [3-6].

In the traditional model, the reflection coefficient of proteins across the capillary wall was assumed to be close to 1. However, owing to albumin diffusion through large capillary pores, approximately half of the body's albumin content is extravascular, and, when directly measured, interstitial oncotic pressure is 30 to 60 percent of plasma oncotic pressure [6].

Actual capillary hemodynamics differ from the classical Starling equation because the structure of the interstitial space and the capillary filtration barrier are much more complex than was once believed [3-6]. The interstitial space is not simply a protein-free ultrafiltrate of plasma. Rather, the interstitium is a triphasic system consisting of free-flowing fluid, a gel phase consisting of large polyanionic glycosaminoglycan (GAG) molecules, and a collagen matrix. Sodium ions bound to GAG exert osmotic pressure that promotes capillary filtration while the collagen matrix exerts hydrostatic pressure that opposes it [6]. Interstitial albumin is confined to the free-flowing fluid phase, and its concentration is determined by the relative rates of water and albumin flux through the capillary.

Capillary lumens are lined with a glycocalyx consisting of a complex network of GAG molecules and other glycoproteins, forming a filtration barrier that is interrupted by clefts through which capillary filtration occurs [3-5]. Because albumin is excluded from the luminal surface of these filtration clefts, intravascular albumin exerts much more oncotic pressure than would be predicted from direct measurements of interstitial albumin concentrations; ie, the true net filtration force across the capillary membrane depends not so much upon interstitial oncotic pressure as upon the colloid oncotic pressure of fluid just below the endothelial glycocalyx.

Fluid accumulating in the interstitial space is returned to the circulation by lymphatics [3-6]. The capacity for lymph flow varies among tissues, and there is emerging evidence that lymphangiogenesis may be regulated by interstitial sodium bound to GAG molecules [7].

Capillary dynamics differ substantially among the vascular beds of different organs [8]. As an example, hepatic sinusoids are highly permeable to proteins; as a result, the capillary and interstitial oncotic pressures are roughly equal, and there is little transcapillary oncotic pressure gradient [2]. The net effect is that the hydraulic pressure gradient favoring filtration is essentially unopposed. To some degree, filtration is minimized by a lower capillary hydraulic pressure than in skeletal muscle since approximately two-thirds of hepatic blood flow is derived from the portal vein, a low-pressure system. In addition, ascites does not normally develop, because the filtered fluid is removed by the lymphatics.

The alveolar capillaries also have a relatively low capillary hydraulic pressure (due to perfusion from the low-pressure system in the right ventricle) and are more permeable than skeletal muscle to proteins. This results in smaller transcapillary hydraulic and oncotic pressure gradients [9]. The clinical significance of this difference will be discussed below.

Edema formation — The development of edema requires an alteration in capillary dynamics in a direction that favors an increase in net filtration and also inadequate removal of the additional filtered fluid by lymphatic drainage. Edema may form in response to an elevation in capillary hydraulic pressure (which increases the "delta hydraulic pressure") or increased capillary permeability (Lp), or it can be due to disruption of the endothelial glycocalyx, decreased interstitial compliance, a lower plasma oncotic pressure (which reduces the "delta oncotic pressure"), or a combination of these changes (table 1). Edema can also be induced by lymphatic obstruction since the fluid that is normally filtered is not returned to the systemic circulation.

Increased capillary hydraulic pressure — Capillary hydraulic pressure, although generated by cardiac contraction, is relatively insensitive to alterations in arterial pressure. This stability is due to autoregulatory changes in resistance at the precapillary sphincter, which determine the extent to which the arterial pressure is transmitted to the capillary. If the arterial pressure is increased, for example, the sphincter constricts, minimizing the elevation in capillary hydraulic pressure and preventing the development of edema.

By contrast, the resistance at the venous end of the capillary is not well regulated. Consequently, changes in venous pressure result in parallel alterations in capillary hydraulic pressure. The venous pressure is increased in two settings: (1) when the blood volume is expanded, augmenting the volume in the venous system; and (2) when there is venous obstruction. Examples of edema due to volume expansion include heart failure and kidney disease; edema due to effective venous obstruction is commonly seen with cirrhosis of the liver, in which there is a marked increase in hepatic sinusoidal pressure, and with deep venous thrombosis in the lower extremities. Diastolic dysfunction due to decreased compliance of the heart (which results in pulmonary edema) and right heart failure and pericardial disease (which result in peripheral edema) are other causes of effective venous obstruction.

Hypoalbuminemia — Hypoalbuminemia due to albumin loss in the urine in the nephrotic syndrome or to decreased hepatic albumin synthesis also contributes to edema formation. However, chronic hypoalbuminemia alone may be insufficient to induce edema. (See 'Compensatory factors' below.)

Increased capillary permeability — An increase in capillary permeability due to vascular injury promotes the development of edema for several reasons. With vascular injury, the unit permeability (porosity, or "Lp" in the equation above) of the capillary wall increases, which tends to increase net filtration. In addition, the reflection coefficient of proteins across the capillary wall ("s" in the equation above) decreases, and disruption of the glycocalyx narrows the difference between the oncotic pressure of the capillary and the oncotic pressure of fluid just below the endothelial glycocalyx, thereby reducing the oncotic pressure gradient.

Increased capillary permeability contributes to edema in the following clinical settings:

Burns, in which both histamine and oxygen free radicals can induce microvascular injury in addition to the direct physical action of the injury [10].

Therapy with recombinant human interleukin-2 or vascular endothelial growth factor, which appear to directly increase capillary permeability [11,12].

Episodic idiopathic capillary leak syndromes, which may be mediated by increased expression of interleukin-2 receptors on circulating mononuclear cells or by increased generation of kinins [13-15]. Affected patients often have an associated monoclonal gammopathy and, during episodes, have a massive leak of proteins and fluids out of the vascular space with the hematocrit rising acutely to as high as 70 to 80 percent [15]. The mortality rate is high in this disorder. Preliminary evidence suggests that the combination of aminophylline (an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase) and terbutaline (a relatively selective beta-2-adrenergic agonist) may prevent episodes [15,16] and therefore improve survival [13,16]. It is not clear, however, why these drugs are effective. The associated monoclonal gammopathy may progress to overt multiple myeloma among those patients with capillary leak syndrome who survive long enough. In one series of 11 patients followed for a mean of 6.4 years, three died, one during an attack and two from multiple myeloma [13]. (See "Idiopathic systemic capillary leak syndrome".)

Any of the conditions associated with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. In this disorder, ischemia- or sepsis-induced release of cytokines, such as interleukin-1 or tumor necrosis factor, may play an important role in the increase in pulmonary capillary permeability, at least in part via the recruitment of neutrophils [17,18].

Capillary permeability is moderately increased in patients with diabetes mellitus [19,20]. This abnormality may be mediated in part by hyperglycemia-induced accumulation of advanced glycosylation end products derived from the combination of glucose with circulating proteins [21]. The net effect is to enhance the severity of edema which, in these patients, is usually due to heart failure or the nephrotic syndrome.

The malnutrition syndrome, kwashiorkor, may be another example of edema due in part to increased capillary permeability. Although edema has often been ascribed to hypoalbuminemia, increased generation of cysteinyl leukotrienes that increase capillary permeability may be of primary importance in the edema of kwashiorkor [22]. (See 'Compensatory factors' below.)

Lymphatic obstruction (lymphedema) — Lymphatic obstruction is an unusual cause of edema (called lymphedema). It is most often due to radical lymph node dissection for malignancy (eg, breast cancer). Lymphatic obstruction may also play a pivotal role in the development of "nephrogenic ascites" [23,24]. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of peripheral lymphedema" and "Unique aspects of gastrointestinal disease in patients on dialysis", section on 'Hemodialysis-associated ascites'.)

Myxedema — Hypothyroidism leads to a marked accumulation of interstitial albumin and other proteins [25]. Although this may be due in part to an elevation in capillary protein permeability, the excess interstitial protein and fluid would normally be returned to the systemic circulation by the lymphatics. However, lymphatic flow is low or normal in patients with myxedema [25] and not increased as in other edematous states [26]. This may be due to binding of the filtered proteins to excess interstitial mucopolysaccharides, thereby preventing their removal by the lymphatics [25].

Compensatory factors — Since there is normally a small gradient favoring filtration, it might be expected that only a minor change in these hemodynamic forces would lead to edema. However, experimental and clinical observations indicate that there must be at least a 15 mmHg increase in the gradient favoring filtration before edema can be detected [1,2]. Two factors contribute to this protective response:

Lymphatic flow and contractility increase in the presence of tissue edema and remove some of the excess filtrate [27,28]. With pulmonary edema due to heart failure, for example, accumulation of lung liquid at any given elevation in pulmonary capillary pressure is related to the functional capacity of the lymphatics which, in turn, is influenced by both individual factors and the acuteness of the hemodynamic change [29]. With acute rises in pulmonary capillary pressures, the pulmonary lymphatic system does not have an increased capacity to remove fluid; as a result, pulmonary edema occurs at pulmonary artery capillary pressures as low as 18 mmHg. By contrast, patients with chronic heart failure have an increased lymphatic capacity and do not develop pulmonary edema until much higher pulmonary capillary pressures (eg, >25 mmHg) are reached.

Fluid entry into the interstitium will eventually raise the interstitial hydraulic pressure, reducing the pressure gradient favoring filtration [1].

In contrast to the systemic vasculature, glycocalyx GAGs of the pulmonary vessels do not appear to contribute to the pulmonary endothelial barrier to fluid and protein [30]. Instead, the alveolar capillaries appear to have a greater baseline permeability to albumin [2,9], which leads to increased protection against edema due to hypoalbuminemia than seen in skeletal muscle. Thus, in the absence of a concurrent rise in left atrial and pulmonary capillary pressures, pulmonary edema is not usually seen with hypoalbuminemia, even at a plasma albumin concentration acutely low enough to induce peripheral edema [31].

The response is appreciably different after the rapid administration of large volumes of saline to patients with marked hypovolemia, a condition in which a low plasma albumin concentration can predictably cause edema. In this setting, there is acute dilutional hypoalbuminemia without time for the interstitial albumin concentration to fall. As a result, the transcapillary oncotic pressure gradient is reduced, and pulmonary edema can occur before the restoration of normal intracardiac filling pressures.

Renal sodium retention — As noted above, the retention of fluid by the kidney in edematous states can represent an appropriate compensatory response to reduced effective arterial blood volume (also called effective circulating volume depletion) or an inappropriate manifestation of kidney disease [31,32]. In most instances, the effective arterial blood volume is directly proportional to the cardiac output. Thus, when the cardiac output is reduced because of underlying cardiac disease, the kidney serves to restore the effective arterial blood volume by retaining sodium and water.

However, effective tissue perfusion and the cardiac output are not always related, since the former can also be reduced by a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance [33]. As an example, experimental creation of an arteriovenous fistula is associated with no initial change in cardiac output, yet tissue perfusion is reduced since the blood flowing through the fistula is bypassing the capillary circulation. In response to this hemodynamic change, the kidney retains sodium and water, thereby increasing the blood volume and cardiac output [34]. The new steady state is characterized by a cardiac output that exceeds the baseline level by an amount equal to the flow rate through the fistula.

A common clinical correlate of this experiment occurs in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, who frequently have an elevated cardiac output [35]. Despite this, they behave as if they are volume depleted, as evidenced by avid renal sodium retention and a progressive rise in secretion of the three hypovolemic hormones (renin, norepinephrine, and antidiuretic hormone [ADH]) [33,36,37]. (See "Hyponatremia in patients with cirrhosis".)

The disparity between the high cardiac output and the kidney and neurohumoral responses in cirrhosis is due both to splanchnic vasodilatation and to the presence of multiple arteriovenous fistulas throughout the body, such as spider angiomata in the skin. The net effect is a marked fall in systemic vascular resistance and a reduction in systemic blood pressure [33,38]. Much of the cardiac output is circulating ineffectively, as there is a progressive reduction in kidney and eventually musculocutaneous perfusion [39].

The renal sodium and water retention seen in heart failure or cirrhosis results from both a hypovolemia-induced fall in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and, more importantly, an increase in tubular reabsorption. The latter is mediated by increases in the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems [33,40,41].

The compensated state — Although the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system undoubtedly contributes to sodium retention in disorders such as heart failure and cirrhosis, the plasma renin activity is normal in some patients with these disorders [41,42]. A partial explanation for this seemingly paradoxical finding is that the patient has entered a compensated state in which the initial fluid retention has increased venous return to the heart, thereby allowing systemic hemodynamics to be stabilized (at least in the resting state) and removing the stimulus for continued renin release [40,41]. This sequence is depicted in the figure, which shows the changes that occur with chronic thoracic inferior vena cava constriction, an experimental model that simulates the changes seen in heart failure in humans (figure 1) [40]. The new steady state seen after six to seven days is characterized by plasma volume expansion but normalization of the systemic blood pressure, urinary sodium excretion, and renin and aldosterone release.

In many patients, however, stable heart failure is associated with a persistent reduction in cardiac output, and it is not clear why renin levels should be normal [40]. One possible explanation is that circulating levels may not reflect the degree of activation of tissue renin-angiotensin systems. (See "Pathophysiology of heart failure: Neurohumoral adaptations", section on 'Renin-angiotensin system'.)

ETIOLOGY — The most common causes of generalized edema seen by the clinician are:

Heart failure

Cirrhosis

Nephrotic syndrome and other forms of kidney disease

Premenstrual edema and pregnancy

The pathogenesis of edema in heart failure will be reviewed here because it illustrates many of the mechanisms described above [43]; the unusual causes of drug-induced edema and refeeding edema will also be briefly reviewed. However, the pathogenesis of edema in cirrhosis, kidney disease, and premenstrual or pregnant women is discussed separately. The pathogenesis of the uncommon condition idiopathic edema, which is generally seen in young women, is also presented separately:

(See "Pathogenesis of ascites in patients with cirrhosis".)

(See "Pathophysiology and treatment of edema in adults with the nephrotic syndrome".)

(See "Preeclampsia: Clinical features and diagnosis".)

(See "Idiopathic edema".)

Heart failure — Heart failure can be produced by a variety of disorders, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, the cardiomyopathies, valvular disease, and cor pulmonale. The edema in the different causes of heart failure is due to an increase in venous pressure that produces a parallel rise in capillary hydraulic pressure and to renal sodium retention due to reduced perfusion of the kidneys. Despite the similarity in pathogenesis, the site of edema accumulation is variable and is dependent upon the nature of the cardiac disease [44]:

Coronary heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, and left-sided valvular disease tend to preferentially impair left ventricular function. As a result, patients with one of these disorders typically present with pulmonary but not peripheral edema.

Cor pulmonale, by contrast, is initially associated with pure right ventricular failure, resulting in prominent edema in the lower extremities and, perhaps, ascites.

Cardiomyopathies tend to produce equivalent involvement of both the right and left ventricles, often leading to the simultaneous onset of pulmonary and peripheral edema.

In acute pulmonary edema due to a myocardial infarction or ischemia, the left ventricular disease results in elevations in left ventricular end-diastolic and left atrial pressures, which are transmitted back through the pulmonary veins to the pulmonary capillaries. In general, the pulmonary capillary pressure must exceed 18 to 20 mmHg (normal equals 5 to 12 mmHg) before acute pulmonary edema occurs [45].

The pathogenesis of edema formation is somewhat different in chronic heart failure. In this setting, the increase in capillary pressure is a result of plasma volume expansion, not solely the obstructive effect of a diseased heart. This is called the forward hypothesis of heart failure, in which the primary event is a reduction in cardiac output [33,46]. This decrease in tissue perfusion leads to activation of the sympathetic and renin-angiotensin systems, which tend to promote sodium and water retention; they also tend to increase vascular resistance and cardiac inotropy, which maintain the systemic blood pressure [47,48]. (See "Pathophysiology of heart failure: Neurohumoral adaptations", section on 'Neurohumoral adaptations'.)

The net effect in patients with relatively well-preserved cardiac function is an initially mild impairment in sodium-excretory ability. Edema is often absent at this time, unless there is a high level of sodium intake [49]. With more advanced disease, however, forward output can be restored only by plasma volume expansion and intracardiac filling pressures that are high enough to promote edema formation.

Similar considerations apply to high-output heart failure due, for example, to hyperthyroidism (where the hypermetabolic state leads to an increase in energy requirements) or to arteriovenous fistulas (where blood flowing through the fistulas is bypassing the capillary circulation). In these conditions, the patients still behave as if they are effectively volume depleted since the cardiac output is inappropriately low in relation to tissue needs [34,50].

The effect of fluid retention on cardiac function is illustrated in the following figure (figure 2) [43]. The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is a function of the plasma and extracellular fluid volumes and is increased or decreased by expanding or reducing those fluid spaces. The upper curve represents the normal Frank-Starling relationship between stroke volume and LVEDP and shows how increasing cardiac stretch enhances cardiac contractility [39] (see "Pathophysiology of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Hemodynamic alterations and remodeling"). The development of mild cardiac failure (middle curve) will, if the sympathetic stimulation of cardiac function is insufficient, lower both stroke volume and cardiac output (line AB). The ensuing renal sodium and water retention can reverse these abnormalities since the increments in plasma volume will increase the LVEDP, and this augments cardiac contractility (line BC).

At this point, the patient is in a new steady state of compensated heart failure in which the stroke volume and cardiac output are normal, sodium excretion matches sodium intake, and the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has returned to normal (figure 1) [40,41]. The restoration of tissue perfusion in this setting has occurred only after there has been an elevation in the LVEDP, perhaps to a level sufficient to produce pulmonary edema.

There are several points that deserve emphasis in this simple example of mild to moderate heart failure:

It demonstrates again the dual effects of fluid retention in edematous states: a beneficial increment in cardiac output and a potentially harmful elevation in venous pressure.

It illustrates that vascular congestion (that is, an elevated LVEDP) and a low cardiac output do not have to occur together in patients with heart disease. At point B, the patient is in a low-output state, but there is no congestion; at point C, the patient is congested but has a normal cardiac output.

The Frank-Starling relationship varies with exercise. Patients with moderate heart disease may have a normal cardiac output at rest but may be unable to increase it adequately with even mild exertion [51]. This relative decrease in tissue perfusion can lead sequentially to further neurohumoral activation, renal vasoconstriction and ischemia, sodium retention, and ultimately edema [52,53].

Patients with mild to moderate heart disease may have no edema with dietary sodium restriction but may retain sodium and possibly become edematous if given a sodium load [49]. Suppose points A and C in the figure reflect the hemodynamic state on a low-sodium diet (figure 1). An increase in sodium intake will initially expand the intravascular volume and raise the LVEDP. In the normal subject (point A) who is still on the ascending limb of the Frank-Starling curve, the increase in filling pressure will enhance stroke volume and cardiac output, which will then promote the excretion of the excess sodium. By contrast, a similar elevation in the LVEDP in the patient with heart failure (point C), who is on a flatter part of the curve, will produce less of an increment both in cardiac output and consequently in sodium excretion. Limiting dietary sodium intake in this setting may be sufficient to alleviate the edema.

The situation is somewhat different with severe heart failure (figure 2). At this time, the plateau in stroke volume occurs earlier and at a lower level than in mild heart failure, and increasing the LVEDP cannot normalize the stroke volume. Two factors appear to account for this plateau:

The heart may simply have reached its maximum capacity to increase contractility in response to increasing stretch. In vitro studies suggest that this abnormality may result from decreased calcium affinity for and therefore binding to troponin C and from decreased calcium availability within the myocardial cells [54]. (See "Excitation-contraction coupling in myocardium".)

The Frank-Starling relationship actually applies to left ventricular end-diastolic volume since it is the stretching of cardiac muscle that is responsible for the enhanced contractility. The more easily measured LVEDP is used clinically since, in relatively normal hearts, pressure and volume vary in parallel. However, cardiac compliance may be greatly reduced with severe heart disease [55]. As a result, a small increase in volume produces a large elevation in LVEDP but no substantial stretching of the cardiac muscle and therefore little change in cardiac output [56].

Drug-induced edema — Certain drugs can induce edema by enhancing renal sodium reabsorption (table 1). In the past, this was most likely to occur with potent direct vasodilators such as minoxidil and diazoxide, which are now infrequently used [57-59]. Patients treated with minoxidil, for example, often require therapy with high doses of a loop diuretic (such as 160 to 240 mg of furosemide) to prevent edema formation.

The mechanism by which these agents stimulate sodium retention is uncertain. The fall in blood pressure itself probably plays an important role both directly and by activating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems, both of which stimulate sodium retention [57,60]. The ability of sympatholytic agents to directly diminish renin release and of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to diminish angiotensin II production may explain why these drugs do not produce edema even though they lead to an equivalent reduction in blood pressure.

Peripheral edema occurs in 4 to 6 percent of diabetic patients treated with a thiazolidinedione such as pioglitazone or rosiglitazone (compared with 1 to 2 percent with placebo) and in a higher percentage of patients with a history of heart failure or those also treated with insulin. The mechanism is stimulation of sodium reabsorption by the sodium channels in the luminal membrane of collecting tubule cells, which is the same site stimulated by aldosterone. (See "Thiazolidinediones in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus", section on 'Fluid retention/heart failure'.)

Other causes of drug-induced edema include:

Calcium channel blockers, particularly the dihydropyridines, can result in leakage of fluid out of the capillary due primarily to dilatation of the precapillary sphincter [61]. (See "Major side effects and safety of calcium channel blockers".)

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs inhibit renal prostaglandin synthesis and can exacerbate edema in patients with underlying heart failure or cirrhosis [62]. (See "NSAIDs: Electrolyte complications".)

Fludrocortisone, a synthetic mineralocorticoid used in the treatment of hypoaldosteronism and orthostatic hypotension, initially causes fluid retention, but edema is unusual because of the phenomenon of mineralocorticoid escape. (See "Pathophysiology and clinical features of primary aldosteronism".)

Estrogens (alone or in oral contraceptives) may promote sodium retention, primarily in patients with impaired estrogen metabolism due to hepatic disease [63,64].

Pramipexole, a dopamine agonist used in the treatment of Parkinson disease and restless legs syndrome, causes peripheral edema in approximately 5 percent of patients; this effect appears to be dose related, but the mechanism is uncertain [65].

Docetaxel, used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, produces fluid retention that is cumulative and often dose limiting [66-68]. However, with appropriate premedication (three to five days of oral corticosteroids, beginning 24 hours prior to dosing), higher cumulative doses can be administered before fluid retention occurs [68].

Refeeding edema — Patients who have fasted for as little as three days retain sodium and may become edematous after refeeding with carbohydrates [69-74]. Insulin levels, which increase in response to the renewed intake of carbohydrates, result in enhanced reabsorption of sodium, thereby causing edema [72].

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient education: Edema (swelling) (Beyond the Basics)").

SUMMARY

There are two basic steps involved in edema formation (see 'Pathophysiology of edema formation' above):

An alteration in capillary hemodynamics that favors the movement of fluid from the vascular space into the interstitium

The retention of dietary or intravenously administered sodium and water by the kidneys

The following sequence occurs (see 'Pathophysiology of edema formation' above):

The initial movement of fluid from the vascular space into the interstitium reduces the plasma volume, and consequently reduces tissue perfusion.

In response to these changes, the kidney retains sodium and water.

Some of this fluid stays in the vascular space, returning the plasma volume toward normal. However, the alteration in capillary hemodynamics results in most of the retained fluid entering the interstitium and eventually becoming apparent as edema.

Renal sodium and water retention in most edematous states is an appropriate compensation in that it restores tissue perfusion, even though it also augments the degree of edema. The hemodynamic effects are different when the primary abnormality is inappropriate renal fluid retention. In this setting, both the plasma and interstitial volumes are expanded. (See 'Pathophysiology of edema formation' above.)

The exchange of fluid between the plasma and the interstitium is determined by the hydraulic and oncotic pressures in each compartment. (See 'Capillary hemodynamics' above.)

The development of edema requires an alteration in one or more of the Starling forces in a direction that favors an increase in net filtration and also inadequate removal of the additional filtered fluid by lymphatic drainage. This can be produced by (table 1) (see 'Edema formation' above):

An elevation in capillary hydraulic pressure

Increased capillary permeability

Higher interstitial oncotic pressure

A lower plasma oncotic pressure

Lymphatic obstruction

A combination of these changes

Three factors protect against edema formation; these include (see 'Compensatory factors' above):

Lymphatic flow and contractility increase in the presence of tissue edema and remove some of the excess filtrate

Fluid entry into the interstitium will eventually raise the interstitial hydraulic pressure, reducing the pressure gradient favoring filtration

Fluid entry into the interstitium also lowers the interstitial oncotic pressure, both by dilution and by lymphatic-mediated removal of interstitial proteins

The most common causes of generalized edema seen by the clinician are (see 'Etiology' above):

Heart failure (see 'Heart failure' above)

Cirrhosis (see "Pathogenesis of ascites in patients with cirrhosis")

Nephrotic syndrome and other forms of kidney disease (see "Pathophysiology and treatment of edema in adults with the nephrotic syndrome")

Premenstrual edema and pregnancy (see "Preeclampsia: Clinical features and diagnosis")

  1. Guyton AC. Chapter 16. In: Textbook of Medical Physiology, 8th ed, Saunders, Philadelphia 1991.
  2. Taylor AE. Capillary fluid filtration. Starling forces and lymph flow. Circ Res 1981; 49:557.
  3. Levick JR, Michel CC. Microvascular fluid exchange and the revised Starling principle. Cardiovasc Res 2010; 87:198.
  4. Reed RK, Rubin K. Transcapillary exchange: role and importance of the interstitial fluid pressure and the extracellular matrix. Cardiovasc Res 2010; 87:211.
  5. Woodcock TE, Woodcock TM. Revised Starling equation and the glycocalyx model of transvascular fluid exchange: an improved paradigm for prescribing intravenous fluid therapy. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108:384.
  6. Bhave G, Neilson EG. Body fluid dynamics: back to the future. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22:2166.
  7. Wiig H, Schröder A, Neuhofer W, et al. Immune cells control skin lymphatic electrolyte homeostasis and blood pressure. J Clin Invest 2013; 123:2803.
  8. Renkin EM. B. W. Zweifach Award lecture. Regulation of the microcirculation. Microvasc Res 1985; 30:251.
  9. Crandall ED, Staub NC, Goldberg HS, Effros RM. Recent developments in pulmonary edema. Ann Intern Med 1983; 99:808.
  10. Deitch EA. The management of burns. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1249.
  11. Belldegrun A, Webb DE, Austin HA 3rd, et al. Effects of interleukin-2 on renal function in patients receiving immunotherapy for advanced cancer. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106:817.
  12. Baumgartner I, Rauh G, Pieczek A, et al. Lower-extremity edema associated with gene transfer of naked DNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:880.
  13. Amoura Z, Papo T, Ninet J, et al. Systemic capillary leak syndrome: report on 13 patients with special focus on course and treatment. Am J Med 1997; 103:514.
  14. Cicardi M, Gardinali M, Bisiani G, et al. The systemic capillary leak syndrome: appearance of interleukin-2-receptor-positive cells during attacks. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:475.
  15. Droder RM, Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Control of systemic capillary leak syndrome with aminophylline and terbutaline. Am J Med 1992; 92:523.
  16. Tahirkheli NK, Greipp PR. Treatment of the systemic capillary leak syndrome with terbutaline and theophylline. A case series. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130:905.
  17. Ohlsson K, Björk P, Bergenfeldt M, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist reduces mortality from endotoxin shock. Nature 1990; 348:550.
  18. Colletti LM, Remick DG, Burtch GD, et al. Role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the pathophysiologic alterations after hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat. J Clin Invest 1990; 85:1936.
  19. Bollinger A, Frey J, Jäger K, et al. Patterns of diffusion through skin capillaries in patients with long-term diabetes. N Engl J Med 1982; 307:1305.
  20. Hommel E, Mathiesen ER, Aukland K, Parving HH. Pathophysiological aspects of edema formation in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 1990; 38:1187.
  21. Brownlee M. Lilly Lecture 1993. Glycation and diabetic complications. Diabetes 1994; 43:836.
  22. Mayatepek E, Becker K, Gana L, et al. Leukotrienes in the pathophysiology of kwashiorkor. Lancet 1993; 342:958.
  23. Morgan AG, Terry SI. Impaired peritoneal fluid drainage in nephrogenic ascites. Clin Nephrol 1981; 15:61.
  24. Hammond TC, Takiyyuddin MA. Nephrogenic ascites: a poorly understood syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994; 5:1173.
  25. Parving HH, Hansen JM, Nielsen SL, et al. Mechanisms of edema formation in myxedema--increased protein extravasation and relatively slow lymphatic drainage. N Engl J Med 1979; 301:460.
  26. HOLLANDER W, REILLY P, BURROWS BA. Lymphatic flow in human subjects as indicated by the disappearance of 1-131-labeled albumin from the subcutaneous tissue. J Clin Invest 1961; 40:222.
  27. Taylor AE. The lymphatic edema safety factor: the role of edema dependent lymphatic factors (EDLF). Lymphology 1990; 23:111.
  28. Bräutigam P, Vanscheidt W, Földi E, et al. [Involvement of the lymphatic system in primary non-lymphogenic edema of the leg. Studies with 2-compartment lymphoscintigraphy]. Hautarzt 1997; 48:556.
  29. Szidon JP. Pathophysiology of the congested lung. Cardiol Clin 1989; 7:39.
  30. Yang Y, Schmidt EP. The endothelial glycocalyx: an important regulator of the pulmonary vascular barrier. Tissue Barriers 2013; 1.
  31. Zarins CK, Rice CL, Peters RM, Virgilio RW. Lymph and pulmonary response to isobaric reduction in plasma oncotic pressure in baboons. Circ Res 1978; 43:925.
  32. Schrier RW. Body fluid volume regulation in health and disease: a unifying hypothesis. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:155.
  33. Schrier RW. An odyssey into the milieu intérieur: pondering the enigmas. J Am Soc Nephrol 1992; 2:1549.
  34. EPSTEIN FH, FERGUSON TB. The effect of the formation of an arteriovenous fistula upon blood volume. J Clin Invest 1955; 34:434.
  35. KOWALSKI HJ, ABELMANN WH. The cardiac output at rest in Laennec's cirrhosis. J Clin Invest 1953; 32:1025.
  36. Pérez-Ayuso RM, Arroyo V, Camps J, et al. Evidence that renal prostaglandins are involved in renal water metabolism in cirrhosis. Kidney Int 1984; 26:72.
  37. Henriksen JH, Bendtsen F, Gerbes AL, et al. Estimated central blood volume in cirrhosis: relationship to sympathetic nervous activity, beta-adrenergic blockade and atrial natriuretic factor. Hepatology 1992; 16:1163.
  38. Fernandez-Seara J, Prieto J, Quiroga J, et al. Systemic and regional hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites with and without functional renal failure. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:1304.
  39. Cohn JN. Blood pressure and cardiac performance. Am J Med 1973; 55:351.
  40. Watkins L Jr, Burton JA, Haber E, et al. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in congestive failure in conscious dogs. J Clin Invest 1976; 57:1606.
  41. Dzau VJ, Colucci WS, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Relation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to clinical state in congestive heart failure. Circulation 1981; 63:645.
  42. Chonko AM, Bay WH, Stein JH, Ferris TF. The role of renin and aldosterone in the salt retention of edema. Am J Med 1977; 63:881.
  43. Rose BD, Post TW. Chapter 16. In: Clinical Physiology of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders, McGraw-Hill, New York 2001.
  44. Blankfield RP, Finkelhor RS, Alexander JJ, et al. Etiology and diagnosis of bilateral leg edema in primary care. Am J Med 1998; 105:192.
  45. McHugh TJ, Forrester JS, Adler L, et al. Pulmonary vascular congestion in acute myocardial infarction: hemodynamic and radiologic correlations. Ann Intern Med 1972; 76:29.
  46. Warren JV, Stead EA. Fluid dynamics in chronic congestive heart failure: An interpretation of the mechanisms producing the edema, increased plasma volume, and elevated venous pressure in certain patients with prolonged congestive failure. Arch Intern Med 1944; 73:138.
  47. Dzau VJ. Renal and circulatory mechanisms in congestive heart failure. Kidney Int 1987; 31:1402.
  48. Packer M. Neurohormonal interactions and adaptations in congestive heart failure. Circulation 1988; 77:721.
  49. BRAUNWALD E, PLAUTH WH Jr, MORROW AG. A METHOD FOR THE DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF IMPAIRED SODIUM EXCRETION. RESULTS OF AN ORAL SODIUM TOLERANCE TEST IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH HEART DISEASE. Circulation 1965; 32:223.
  50. Winaver J, Hoffman A, Burnett JC Jr, Haramati A. Hormonal determinants of sodium excretion in rats with experimental high-output heart failure. Am J Physiol 1988; 254:R776.
  51. Reddy HK, Weber KT, Janicki JS, McElroy PA. Hemodynamic, ventilatory and metabolic effects of light isometric exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:353.
  52. Higgins CB, Vatner SF, Franklin D, Braunwald E. Effects of experimentally produced heart failure on the peripheral vascular response to severe exercise in conscious dogs. Circ Res 1972; 31:186.
  53. Millard RW, Higgins CB, Franklin D, Vatner SF. Regulation of the renal circulation during severe exercise in normal dogs and dogs with experimental heart failure. Circ Res 1972; 31:881.
  54. Schwinger RH, Böhm M, Koch A, et al. The failing human heart is unable to use the Frank-Starling mechanism. Circ Res 1994; 74:959.
  55. Gault JH, Covell JW, Braunwald E, Ross J Jr. Left ventricular performance following correction of free aortic regurgitation. Circulation 1970; 42:773.
  56. Komamura K, Shannon RP, Ihara T, et al. Exhaustion of Frank-Starling mechanism in conscious dogs with heart failure. Am J Physiol 1993; 265:H1119.
  57. Markham RV Jr, Gilmore A, Pettinger WA, et al. Central and regional hemodynamic effects and neurohumoral consequences of minoxidil in severe congestive heart failure and comparison to hydralazine and nitroprusside. Am J Cardiol 1983; 52:774.
  58. Diazoxide therapy: use and risks. Ann Intern Med 1976; 85:529.
  59. Pohl JE, Thurston H, Swales JD. The dntidiuretic action of diazoxide. Clin Sci 1972; 42:145.
  60. Pettinger WA, Keeton K. Altered renin release and propranolol potentiation of vasodilatory drug hypotension. J Clin Invest 1975; 55:236.
  61. Russell RP. Side effects of calcium channel blockers. Hypertension 1988; 11:II42.
  62. Clive DM, Stoff JS. Renal syndromes associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:563.
  63. Christy NP, Shaver JC. Estrogens and the kidney. Kidney Int 1974; 6:366.
  64. PREEDY JR, AITKEN EH. The effect of estrogen on water and electrolyte metabolism. II. Hepatic disease. J Clin Invest 1956; 35:430.
  65. Tan EK, Ondo W. Clinical characteristics of pramipexole-induced peripheral edema. Arch Neurol 2000; 57:729.
  66. Hudis CA, Seidman AD, Crown JP, et al. Phase II and pharmacologic study of docetaxel as initial chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:58.
  67. Trudeau ME, Eisenhauer EA, Higgins BP, et al. Docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14:422.
  68. Piccart MJ, Klijn J, Paridaens R, et al. Corticosteroids significantly delay the onset of docetaxel-induced fluid retention: final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Investigational Drug Branch for Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:3149.
  69. Veverbrants E, Arky RA. Effects of fasting and refeeding. I. Studies on sodium, potassium and water excretion on a constant electrolyte and fluid intake. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1969; 29:55.
  70. Saudek CD, Boulter PR, Knopp RH, Arky RA. Sodium retention accompanying insulin treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1974; 23:240.
  71. Hopkins DF, Cotton SJ, Williams G. Effective treatment of insulin-induced edema using ephedrine. Diabetes Care 1993; 16:1026.
  72. DeFronzo RA, Cooke CR, Andres R, et al. The effect of insulin on renal handling of sodium, potassium, calcium, and phosphate in man. J Clin Invest 1975; 55:845.
  73. Baum M. Insulin stimulates volume absorption in the rabbit proximal convoluted tubule. J Clin Invest 1987; 79:1104.
  74. Nakamura R, Emmanouel DS, Katz AI. Insulin binding sites in various segments of the rabbit nephron. J Clin Invest 1983; 72:388.
Topic 2309 Version 24.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟