ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Digital nerve block

Digital nerve block
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Oct 17, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — The digital nerve block is a procedure in which an anesthetic solution is injected into the base of a finger or toe to provide regional anesthesia. Other methods to anesthetize locally the tissues of the digits vary from applications of topical agents to subcutaneous injections of anesthetic solutions. Due to the extreme sensitivity of the palmar surfaces of the digits, a local injection may be painful and ineffective at anesthetizing the tissues. The injection sites for the digital nerve block are typically less painful; furthermore, they provide a larger area of consistent anesthesia throughout the operative region.

The performance of digital nerve blocks is reviewed here. Specific anesthetics, peripheral nerve blocks of larger nerves, and the management of specific conditions such as nail bed injuries are discussed separately.

(See "Subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetics".)

(See "Overview of peripheral nerve blocks".)

(See "Evaluation and management of fingertip injuries".)

(See "Skin laceration repair with sutures".)

INDICATIONS — A digital nerve block is indicated for the treatment and repair of many acute and nonacute conditions, including finger or toe lacerations beyond the mid-proximal phalanx, nail bed injuries, paronychias, nail avulsions, foreign bodies, and excision of tumors of the digit.

CONTRAINDICATIONS AND PRECAUTIONS

Contraindications include:

Compromised digital circulation.

Infection of the skin or tissues through which the needle will pass.

Allergy to the anesthetic agent.

Additional cautions include:

Avoid using an anesthetic with epinephrine in patients at risk for ischemic injury. (See 'Use of epinephrine' below.)

Consider other techniques when neurologic function of the digit has been previously compromised by an injury.

Use small volumes of anesthetic to decrease the mechanical compression on nerves and blood vessels.

Avoid injecting directly into nerves.

Avoid prolonged use of tourniquets.

ANATOMY — Each digit is innervated by four digital nerves. In order to achieve a complete anesthetic effect, it is necessary to block all four nerves. The digital nerves of the fingers arise from either the median or ulnar nerves and divide in the palm into palmar (or volar) branches. These nerves are accompanied by digital blood vessels as they run on both sides of the flexor tendon sheath to innervate each finger (figure 1 and figure 2). The palmar nerves dominate by innervating all of the finger and the nail bed except for the dorsum of the finger (figure 2), which is innervated by the dorsal digital nerves that run along the dorsolateral aspect of each finger (figure 3A-B). The digital nerves of the toes run on both sides of each toe and represent the terminal branches of the tibial and peroneal nerves (figure 4A-B) [1].

Hand and foot anatomy are discussed in greater detail separately. (See "Finger and thumb anatomy" and "Overview of foot anatomy and biomechanics and assessment of foot pain in adults", section on 'Basic foot anatomy'.)

ANESTHETIC AGENTS

General issues — The types and use of local anesthetic agents is reviewed separately. Selected issues relevant to digital nerve blocks are discussed here. (See "Subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetics".)

Most local anesthetics are classified as amides or esters. These pharmacologic agents act by inhibiting nerve impulses. Commonly used preparations include the amide class agent lidocaine (Xylocaine) and the ester class agent procaine (Novocain) in concentrations of 1 or 2%. Use of higher concentrations can reduce the total volume of fluid injected, which may reduce discomfort and complications from tissue compression. Onset of anesthesia with a digital block typically occurs in about five minutes, but full anesthetic effect may take longer (up to 10 minutes). Individual variation is to be expected.

The effect of lidocaine or procaine may last only 30 to 40 minutes, but anesthesia with bupivacaine (Marcaine) 0.25% typically lasts several hours [2]. The duration of effect of all agents is longer if epinephrine is added, but bupivacaine remains longer-acting [3]. Bupivacaine has been used in combination with shorter-acting agents in patients where prolonged anesthesia is required to try to achieve rapid onset of anesthesia with a prolonged effect, but this is probably not necessary; one small randomized trial found that bupivacaine alone had a similar onset of action to that of lidocaine plus bupivacaine (mean time to anesthesia 5.35 versus 5 minutes) [4].

Before choosing an agent, check to see that the patient does not have any allergies to the preparation to be used. Allergies to lidocaine are rare, but they do occur. Treat allergic reactions aggressively. (See "Allergic reactions to local anesthetics".)

Use of epinephrine — Some local anesthetics are combined with epinephrine in commercially available solutions (eg, lidocaine hydrochloride 1% with epinephrine 1:100,000). Epinephrine causes local vasoconstriction, thereby reducing bleeding, and maintains the anesthetic in the tissues for a longer period of time. However, the digital arteries run in close proximity to the digital nerves and injecting epinephrine into the base of a digit causes vasoconstriction of these vessels [5], which may increase the risk of digital ischemia in susceptible individuals.

Controlled studies of the effectiveness of epinephrine are limited [6]. In most cases, the use of epinephrine for digital blocks appears to be effective and safe when used for short procedures, such as treating ingrown nails (paronychia), repairing a skin laceration, removing a nail, or performing a skin or nail biopsy. In patients at increased risk for digital ischemia or infarction, such as those with peripheral vascular disease, it is best to avoid epinephrine.

Comprehensive reviews of the medical literature and large observational studies, including studies of both low (1:100,00) and high (1:1,000) concentrations of epinephrine in lidocaine, have failed to find any reports of gangrene or major ischemic complications solely attributable to lidocaine with epinephrine or with the use of commercial lidocaine/epinephrine preparations [7-17]. Gangrene had occurred in 1948, prior to the introduction of such commercial preparations [13,14]. In addition, a Doppler study of 24 patients treated with digital blocks containing epinephrine found that the drug's vasoconstrictive effects resolve within 90 minutes [5]. These studies support the safety of appropriately used epinephrine with lidocaine, which leads to faster onset and longer duration of anesthesia without negative vascular sequela when used in digital blocks.

One alternative to using epinephrine to control bleeding when performing a digital block is to place a small Penrose drain clamped around the base of the digit during the procedure. This method is used for short procedures; prolonged digit ischemia (over 60 minutes) must be avoided. Be certain to remove the drain once the procedure is completed.

Pain with administration — Administration of anesthetics can be painful. Techniques for reducing such pain are discussed in detail separately. (See "Subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetics", section on 'Methods to decrease injection pain'.)

A number of measures have been recommended to reduce the pain of anesthesia although data on efficacy are somewhat limited [18]. These include:

Buffering the solution with sodium bicarbonate [19,20]

Using small needles (27 or 30 gauge)

Injecting slowly

Injecting subcutaneously instead of intradermally

Warming the anesthetic to body temperature [21]

The standard solution of lidocaine has a pH of 5.0 to 7.0. It can be buffered to a pH of 7.0 to 7.2 by adding one part of 1 mEq/mL of sodium bicarbonate to 9 or 10 parts of 1% lidocaine. (See "Subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetics".)

EMLA topical cream (lidocaine/prilocaine) has been used to decrease the pain caused by the initial injection of the anesthetic agent. The effectiveness of such agents for decreasing the pain of a digital block is uncertain, as two studies in patients with ingrown toenails produced conflicting results [22,23]. The reason for these differing results is unclear. For EMLA to provide effective albeit superficial anesthesia, it must be applied for one hour prior to injection.

PREPARATION

Informed consent — Informed consent is always advisable when pursuing a procedure, regardless of how minor. Explain the benefits and risks of the procedure, and make sure that the patient understands the issues. Common risks for digital blocks include infection and bleeding. There is also the risk of distal paresthesia, if the nerve is damaged, and the possibility of distal infarct from vasospasm. However, these risks are small and can be avoided with careful attention to technique. Prior to proceeding with the block, perform a neurologic exam to detect sensory abnormalities.

Materials — Gather all the materials necessary to perform the procedure and place them within easy reach. Prepare all supplies in a sterile fashion. For some procedures (eg, removal of in-grown nails, wart treatment), a clean field, rather than sterile technique, may be sufficient. Prepare the anesthetic vial with alcohol prior to drawing up the solution. Usual materials needed for the digital block are:

A 3-mL syringe with an 18 to 22 gauge needle for drawing up anesthetic.

Local anesthetic, buffered with sodium bicarbonate if possible. Digital block is usually achieved with 2 to 3 mL of the anesthetic solution.

A 27- to 30-gauge needle for performing the anesthetic injection. Some clinicians prefer a 25-gauge needle for some of the blocks because it saves time, but smaller needles reduce pain.

Skin preparation — Prepare the skin with a povidone iodine or chlorhexidine solution to decrease the risk of infection. Perform three separate scrubbings with the antibacterial solution to include both the injured area and the injection sites. The ideal technique is to begin at the area of attention and scrub outwards in a circular fashion. This may be difficult with toes, and an alternative is to soak the digit for five minutes in the antibacterial solution. We suggest soaking rather than scrubbing for inflamed, painful digits, such as those with an ingrown nail or paronychia.

DIGITAL BLOCK PROCEDURES — Performing a digital block is relatively straightforward but requires attention to specific precautions. The basic approach is the same for both toes and fingers. Various techniques have been described for anesthetizing the digits. These include the traditional four-sided "ring block," the three-sided digital block, the finger web space block, the transthecal block, and the subcutaneous block [24,25].

General considerations

Regardless of the technique chosen, advance and inject slowly to minimize pain being caused by distension of the tissues from infiltration of the fluid. Avoid using more than 3 to 4 mL of anesthetic solution.

Use a small-gauge needle. (See 'Materials' above.)

Before injecting the solution, slowly retract on the plunger of the syringe to avoid injecting into one of the digital blood vessels that accompany the digital nerves.

While the procedure is somewhat uncomfortable, it should not cause undue pain. Excessive pain or paresthesias suggests that the needle is against or in a nerve. Withdraw 2 mm and reinject; the goal is to bathe the surrounding tissue and nerve with anesthetic, rather than injecting directly into the nerve.

It can take 5 to 10 minutes for the anesthetic to take complete effect. Therefore, it is recommended to wait for at least five minutes after injection to ensure that an adequate block will be achieved. If sensation is present after five minutes, wait an additional five minutes.

Test for anesthesia by pinching the tissues with forceps or with a needle prick. Begin testing with areas most likely to be numb (ie, proximal tissue). Always test the area to be operated upon. For nail removal, test the tip, the proximal and lateral nail folds, and the nail bed.

The techniques below describe bilateral blocks to achieve complete anesthesia. If anesthesia is only required on one side of a digit, the block may be limited to that side.

If sensation persists at the nail tip despite adequate injection, a wing block can be used. (See 'Wing block procedure' below.)

Fingers

Finger web space block (traditional digital block) — The technique is performed as follows:

Once the area has been prepped (see 'Skin preparation' above), place the patient's hand flat and palm-side down on a sterile drape.

Hold the syringe perpendicular to the finger and insert the needle into the subcutaneous tissue of the web space at the base of the finger, just distal to the MCP (metacarpal/phalangeal) joint (picture 1).

Inject the anesthetic into the subcutaneous dorsal tissue, and infiltrate the tissues surrounding the dorsal nerve.

Slowly advance the needle straight through the web space toward the palmar surface, injecting as the needle is advanced, and infiltrating the tissues surrounding the palmar nerve. Avoid pushing the needle through the palmar skin surface. One to 1.5 mL of anesthetic should be sufficient.

Withdraw the needle completely and repeat the procedure on the opposite side of the finger.

Subcutaneous block — The subcutaneous block can be performed with or without tumescence (ie, tumescent block). Both blocks are performed by injecting an anesthetic solution into subcutaneous tissue just below the skin in the middle of the flexor crease at the base of the finger and then massaging the solution into the tissues. The tumescent block improves anesthesia over the dorsum of the proximal phalanx, an area that can be missed by the subcutaneous block.

Locate the proximal skin crease at the base of the palmar side of the injured finger.

Once the area has been prepped (see 'Skin preparation' above), place the patient's hand flat and palm-side up on a sterile drape.

Wearing sterile gloves, pinch together the soft tissue just distal to the proximal skin crease using your nondominant hand.

With the dominant hand, insert the needle at the midpoint of the skin crease just below the skin.

For a subcutaneous block, slowly inject 1 to 2 mL of anesthetic solution.

For a tumescent block, slowly inject anesthetic until there is circumferential distention of the skin (ie, tumescence). Three to 3.5 mL of anesthesia is typically required but ranges from 2 to 4 mL based on the size of the digit.

Massage the anesthetic solution into the tissues.

Transthecal block — The transthecal block (or flexor tendon sheath digital block) is performed by infusing the flexor tendon sheath with an anesthetic solution through a single injection (picture 2 and picture 3):

Locate the flexor tendon by palpating at the level of the distal palmar crease (flexing the digit can help to identify the tendon). Alternative levels include the proximal digital crease or the midpoint between the proximal digital and proximal interphalangeal joint creases (ie, modified transthecal block) [26].

Once the area has been prepped (see 'Skin preparation' above), place the patient's hand flat and palm-side up on a sterile drape.

Hold the syringe at a 45 degree angle for the distal palmar crease level (picture 2) or at a 90-degree angle for the more distal levels (picture 3). Pierce the skin surface with the needle and advance the needle into the flexor tendon sheath.

Once in the sheath, slowly inject 1 to 2 mL of anesthetic solution (1% lidocaine, buffered if possible). The solution should flow freely into the synovial space between the tendon and sheath. If resistance is met, it is likely that the needle tip is against or inside the tendon. Withdraw slightly, until the injection proceeds smoothly. Distend the sheath slightly with the anesthetic solution so that the medication diffuses throughout the synovial sheath.

An alternative method can be used to ensure that the needle is in the tendon sheath:

Insert the needle (not attached to a syringe) into the flexor tendon sheath in the same manner as described above.

Check the needle placement by having the patient flex and extend the finger. If the needle is in the tendon sheath, it should swing in a wide arc with tendon movement.

Once needle placement is confirmed, attach the syringe to the needle and inject the anesthetic slowly.

Choice of technique — The least invasive technique that the clinician is comfortable with should be chosen, since all the blocks provide adequate anesthesia if performed properly. Significant differences are number of injections (ie, traditional web space block has multiple) and technical difficulty (ie, transthecal block requires injecting into tendon sheath); the latter may lead to inadequate anesthesia if the tendon sheath is not found.

A meta-analysis involving 14 trials and one prospective comparative study found that the traditional digital block, the transthecal digital block, and the single subcutaneous digital block are equally effective [27]. All three techniques were similar in assessment of pain of injection, onset of anesthesia, duration of anesthesia, and incidence of incomplete anesthesia.

The subcutaneous block is being increasingly used in dermatologic surgery of digits because this technique is easily learned and provides reliable anesthesia with a single injection. It is often less painful compared with both the transthecal and traditional blocks [28-33]. The subcutaneous block has traditionally had the disadvantage of not providing effective anesthesia over the dorsum of the proximal phalanx, which is addressed by using the tumescent version. A convenience sample study of 123 patients (68 percent with volar lesions and 32 percent with dorsal involvement) found that the subcutaneous block with tumescence of the circumferential base of the digit provided effective anesthesia even with dorsal lesions [34].

The transthecal block also has the advantage of requiring only a single injection. Disadvantages include that it is more painful and technically more difficult than the other blocks [25,28,35], and it has a theoretical risk of flexor tendon injury, although this is unlikely.

The traditional web space block is widely used but has the disadvantages that it puts direct pressure on the neurovascular structures compared with the subcutaneous and transthecal blocks, requires multiple injections, and is more painful than the subcutaneous block.

Thumb — In most instances, digital blocks used for fingers can be used to provide anesthesia for the thumb. Techniques used for the great toe are also readily adapted for use in the thumb (see 'Great toe' below). The tumescent subcutaneous technique provided effective anesthesia in all 10 thumbs in a convenience sample study [34].

Great toe — While the technique is similar for fingers and toes, the great toe is approached somewhat differently as there are nerve branches that come up the dorsal aspect of the great toe that can be missed if anesthetic is only injected laterally and medially.

The great toe can be anesthetized with a four-sided ring block or a three-sided toe block. The three-sided block is preferred to avoid the potential ischemic risk from the ring block.

According to one small randomized trial, pain can be reduced when performing a block of the great toe by using a two-stage injection [36]. This approach involves injecting a small amount (about 0.2 mL) of anaesthetic solution along the standard injection track adjacent to the toe, waiting two minutes, and then reinserting the needle into the same site and injecting the remainder of the solution (about 0.8 mL).

Three-sided toe block

Once the area has been prepped (see 'Skin preparation' above), place the patient's foot flat and plantar-side down on a sterile drape. Alternatively, place the heel on the drape and stabilize the toe with the other hand.

Hold the syringe perpendicular to the toe and insert the needle just distal to the MTP (metatarsal/phalangeal) joint at the lateral edge of the toe (picture 4).

Inject anesthetic into the subcutaneous dorsal tissue.

Slowly advance the needle straight from the dorsal to the plantar surface, injecting as the needle is advanced (picture 5). Avoid pushing the needle through the plantar surface.

One to 2 mL of anesthetic should be sufficient.

Inject over the dorsum of the toe by partially withdrawing the needle and redirecting it across the dorsal aspect of the toe, injecting solution from the lateral to the medial aspect of the toe.

Inject the medial aspect of the toe by inserting the needle perpendicular to the medial aspect, entering via an area of previously anesthetized skin. Inject 1 to 2 mL from the dorsal to the plantar surface.

Four-sided ring block — This block is essentially an extension of the three-sided block, except that it requires an additional injection through the plantar surface of the toe.

Perform a three-sided block. (See 'Three-sided toe block' above.)

Withdraw the needle completely, and insert the needle into the medial or lateral aspect of the plantar surface of the toe, entering through a previously anesthetized area.

Inject 1 mL of anesthetic across the plantar surface of the toe, either going laterally to medially or medially to laterally.

Other toes

Toe digital block

Once the area has been prepped (see 'Skin preparation' above), place the patient's foot flat and plantar-side down on a sterile drape. Alternatively, place the heel on the drape and stabilize the toe with the other hand.

Holding the syringe perpendicular to the finger, insert the needle into the subcutaneous tissue of the web space at the base of the toe, just distal to the MTP (metatarsal/phalangeal) joint in the same manner as described for the finger web space block (see 'Finger web space block (traditional digital block)' above).

Inject the anesthetic into the subcutaneous dorsal tissue and infiltrate the tissues surrounding the dorsal nerve.

Slowly advance the needle straight through the web space toward the plantar surface, injecting as the needle is advanced, and infiltrating the tissues surrounding the plantar nerve. Avoid pushing the needle through the plantar skin surface. One to 1.5 mL of anesthetic should be sufficient.

Withdraw the needle completely and repeat the procedure on the opposite side of the toe.

Unilateral digital block — Ingrown nails sometimes occur on only one side of a toe or finger. In such cases, a unilateral digital block may be used to provide anaesthesia for removal of the affected nail segment. This involves injecting anesthetic either at the base of the digit or at the area between phalanges on either the medial or lateral side. To perform the procedure, insert the needle midway between the dorsal and volar surfaces of the digit perpendicular to the skin, pointing directly toward the phalanx. The needle tip should be near the bone (if you touch the bone, withdraw the needle 1 or 2 mm). Then inject 0.5 mL of anesthetic.

Wing block procedure — An alternative procedure for achieving anesthesia of a distal digit (as might be needed for nail surgery) is to perform a wing block [37]. A wing block is technically relatively simple and may achieve more rapid anesthesia than a digital block. It can be used for fingers or toes and, if anesthesia is only needed on one side of a digit (as for a partial nail removal), can be performed unilaterally.

Once the area has been prepped (see 'Skin preparation' above), place the patient's finger or toe flat and volar-side down on a sterile drape or stabilize the digit with the other hand.

Holding the syringe at a 45 degree angle to the plane of the table and perpendicular to the long axis of the digit, insert the needle a short distance to enter the deep intradermal tissue of the dorsum of the digit at a point approximately 3 mm proximal to an imaginary point where a linear extension of the lateral and proximal nail folds would intersect (picture 6).

Inject the anesthetic into the intradermal tissue, first infiltrating the proximal nail fold; the needle can be advanced to allow infiltration along the proximal nail fold. The needle is then partially withdrawn and redirected to allow infiltration of the intradermal tissue along the lateral nail fold. As the anesthetic is injected, the folds blanch and distend creating a wing-like appearance.

When bilateral anesthesia is desired, anesthetic must be infiltrated similarly on the opposite lateral nail fold and along the entire proximal nail fold. For small digits, it may be possible to achieve this by advancing the needle without requiring a second skin puncture.

If sensation persists at the nail tip, additional anesthetic may be injected into the dermis of the sensate skin using a 30 gauge needle. Anesthesia should be almost immediate.

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Indications – A digital nerve block is indicated for the treatment and repair of finger or toe lacerations beyond the mid-proximal phalanx, nail bed injuries, paronychias, nail avulsions, foreign bodies of the digit, and tumors, among others. (See 'Indications' above.)

Contraindications – Do not perform digital nerve block if compromised digital circulation, infection of the skin or tissues through which the needle will pass, or allergy to the anesthetic agent. (See 'Contraindications and Precautions' above.)

Anesthetic agentLidocaine or procaine lasts only 30 to 40 minutes, while anesthesia with bupivacaine 0.25% typically lasts several hours. Using epinephrine to reduce bleeding appears to be effective and safe when used for short procedures, but avoid in patients at increased risk for digital ischemia or infarction, such as those with peripheral vascular disease. Check the adequacy of anesthesia prior to beginning procedures; blocks typically take 5 to 10 minutes for effect. (See 'Anesthetic agents' above.)

General considerations – Advance and inject slowly to minimize pain being caused by distension of the tissues from infiltration of the fluid. Avoid using more than 3 to 4 mL of anesthetic solution. Use a small gauge needle (eg, 27 to 30 gauge). Check the adequacy of anesthesia before starting any procedure and administer additional anesthetic directly into sensate skin when necessary. (See 'General considerations' above.)

Techniques – Several safe and equally effective techniques are available to achieve a digital block. The least invasive technique that the clinician is comfortable with should be chosen. The subcutaneous block with tumescence is being increasingly used since it achieves anesthesia of the entire digit with a single injection. (See 'Choice of technique' above.)

Finger web space block – This is the traditional digital block (picture 1). (See 'Finger web space block (traditional digital block)' above.)

Flexor surface blocks – The transthecal (ie, flexor tendon sheath digital block) and subcutaneous blocks can anesthetize the entire digit with a small volume via a single needle stick and place less direct mechanical pressure on the neurovascular structures (picture 2 and picture 3). (See 'Transthecal block' above and 'Subcutaneous block' above.)

Great toe digital blocks – The great toe can be anesthetized with a four-sided ring block or a three-sided toe block, which is preferred to avoid the potential ischemic risk from the ring block (picture 4 and picture 5). (See 'Great toe' above.)

Wing block – A wing block is an alternative for achieving anesthesia of a distal digit, especially if only needed on one side of a digit, and may achieve more rapid anesthesia than a digital block. (picture 6) (See 'Wing block procedure' above.)

  1. Grant's Atlas of Anatomy, 14th ed, Agur A, Dalley A (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2017.
  2. Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH. Randomized double-blind comparison of duration of anesthesia among three commonly used agents in digital nerve block. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118:429.
  3. Alhelail M, Al-Salamah M, Al-Mulhim M, Al-Hamid S. Comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for digital nerve blocks. Emerg Med J 2009; 26:347.
  4. Valvano MN, Leffler S. Comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine/bupivacaine for local anesthesia/digital nerve block. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27:490.
  5. Altinyazar HC, Ozdemir H, Koca R, et al. Epinephrine in digital block: color Doppler flow imaging. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30:508.
  6. Prabhakar H, Rath S, Kalaivani M, Bhanderi N. Adrenaline with lidocaine for digital nerve blocks. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD010645.
  7. Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108:114.
  8. Krunic AL, Wang LC, Soltani K, et al. Digital anesthesia with epinephrine: an old myth revisited. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51:755.
  9. Muck AE, Bebarta VS, Borys DJ, Morgan DL. Six years of epinephrine digital injections: absence of significant local or systemic effects. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56:270.
  10. Chowdhry S, Seidenstricker L, Cooney DS, et al. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126:2031.
  11. Mohan PP. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Epinephrine in digital nerve block. Emerg Med J 2007; 24:789.
  12. Lalonde D, Bell M, Benoit P, et al. A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30:1061.
  13. Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller J, et al. Epinephrine in digital blocks: revisited. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 41:410.
  14. Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH, Denkler KA, Feicht AJ. A critical look at the evidence for and against elective epinephrine use in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119:260.
  15. Sonohata M, Nagamine S, Maeda K, et al. Subcutaneous single injection digital block with epinephrine. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2012; 2012:487650.
  16. Fitzcharles-Bowe C, Denkler K, Lalonde D. Finger injection with high-dose (1:1,000) epinephrine: Does it cause finger necrosis and should it be treated? Hand (N Y) 2007; 2:5.
  17. Ilicki J. Safety of Epinephrine in Digital Nerve Blocks: A Literature Review. J Emerg Med 2015; 49:799.
  18. Zilinsky I, Bar-Meir E, Zaslansky R, et al. Ten commandments for minimal pain during administration of local anesthetics. J Drugs Dermatol 2005; 4:212.
  19. Bartfield JM, Ford DT, Homer PJ. Buffered versus plain lidocaine for digital nerve blocks. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22:216.
  20. Cornelius P, Kendall J, Meek S, Rajan R. Alkalinisation of lignocaine to reduce the pain of digital nerve blockade. J Accid Emerg Med 1996; 13:339.
  21. Waldbillig DK, Quinn JV, Stiell IG, Wells GA. Randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing room-temperature and heated lidocaine for digital nerve block. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 26:677.
  22. Browne J, Fung M, Donnelly M, Cooney C. The use of EMLA reduces the pain associated with digital ring block for ingrowing toenail correction. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000; 17:182.
  23. Serour F, Ben-Yehuda Y, Boaz M. EMLA cream prior to digital nerve block for ingrown nail surgery does not reduce pain at injection of anesthetic solution. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46:203.
  24. Morrison WG. Transthecal digital block. Arch Emerg Med 1993; 10:35.
  25. Hill RG Jr, Patterson JW, Parker JC, et al. Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25:604.
  26. Antevy PM, Zuckerbraun NS, Saladino RA, Pitetti RD. Evaluation of a transthecal digital nerve block in the injured pediatric patient. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010; 26:177.
  27. Ito N, Umazume M, Ojima Y, et al. Comparison of traditional two-injection dorsal digital block versus transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hand Surg Rehabil 2021; 40:369.
  28. Low CK, Vartany A, Engstrom JW, et al. Comparison of transthecal and subcutaneous single-injection digital block techniques. J Hand Surg Am 1997; 22:901.
  29. Cannon B, Chan L, Rowlinson JS, et al. Digital anaesthesia: one injection or two? Emerg Med J 2010; 27:533.
  30. Hung VS, Bodavula VK, Dubin NH. Digital anaesthesia: comparison of the efficacy and pain associated with three digital nerve block techniques. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30:581.
  31. Brutus JP, Baeten Y, Chahidi N, et al. Single injection digital block: comparison between three techniques. Chir Main 2002; 21:182.
  32. Martin SP, Chu KH, Mahmoud I, et al. Double-dorsal versus single-volar digital subcutaneous anaesthetic injection for finger injuries in the emergency department: A randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med Australas 2016; 28:193.
  33. Okur OM, Şener A, Kavakli HŞ, et al. Two injection digital block versus single subcutaneous palmar injection block for finger lacerations. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017; 43:863.
  34. Tzeng YS, Chen SG. Tumescent technique in digits: a subcutaneous single-injection digital block. Am J Emerg Med 2012; 30:592.
  35. Keramidas EG, Rodopoulou SG, Tsoutsos D, et al. Comparison of transthecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114:1131.
  36. Whiteley B, Rees S. A randomized controlled trial to compare two techniques for partial digital local anesthetic blocks. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010; 49:143.
  37. Salasche SJ. Surgery. In: Nails: Diagnosis, Therapy, Surgery, 3rd, Scher RK, Daniel CR (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia 2005. p.267.
Topic 262 Version 21.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟