ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Pathogenesis of enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever

Pathogenesis of enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Jan 05, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Enteric fever is characterized by severe systemic illness with fever and abdominal pain [1]. The organism classically responsible for the enteric fever syndrome is Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (formerly S. typhi). Other Salmonella serotypes, particularly S. enterica serotypes Paratyphi A, B, or C, can cause a similar syndrome; however, it is usually not clinically useful or possible to reliably predict the causative organism based on clinical findings [2]. The term "enteric fever" is a collective term that refers to both typhoid and paratyphoid fever, and "typhoid" and "enteric fever" are often used interchangeably.

The pathogenesis of enteric fever will be reviewed here. The epidemiology, microbiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of enteric fever are discussed separately. (See "Enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis" and "Enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever: Treatment and prevention" and "Immunizations for travel".)

PATHOGENESIS — The pathogenesis of enteric fever depends on a number of factors including the infecting species and infectious dose. Ingested organisms survive exposure to gastric acid before gaining access to the small bowel, where they penetrate the epithelium, enter the lymphoid tissue, and disseminate via the lymphatic or hematogenous route. A chronic carrier state is established in an estimated 1 to 5 percent of cases [1,3,4]. (See "Enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Chronic carriers'.)

The organisms — The microbiology of organisms responsible for enteric fever is discussed separately. (See "Enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Microbiology'.)

Unlike most S. enterica serovars, which have broad host ranges, typhoidal salmonellae are human-restricted pathogens, which has shaped their evolutionary history. For S. Typhi, multiple distinct lineages have evolved and spread regionally and globally; a large analysis of whole genome sequencing data revealed frequent international and intercontinental spread of S. Typhi strains, often carrying genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance [5]. A multidrug-resistant lineage designated H58 emerged in the 1980s and quickly spread throughout Asia and Africa, becoming globally dominant. Also, long-term carriers may secrete S. Typhi variants with considerable genetic diversity [6]. Such changes may occur in response to antimicrobial therapy and/or host immune responses. Of note, S. Paratyphi A and S. Typhi have undergone convergent evolution through recombination and shared pseudogene formation [7].

Taken together, these studies suggest that S. Typhi evolves in response to environmental pressures, that especially virulent clones may exist, and that further study is needed to understand the specific virulence properties of this pathogen.

Infectious dose — Data on the numbers of S. Typhi organisms required to cause disease have been obtained from human volunteer studies and from epidemiologic investigations [8]. In general, the greater the infectious dose, the higher the attack rate and the shorter the incubation period. In a modern human challenge study, the Quailes strain was administered in bicarbonate solution to healthy volunteers and resulted in typhoid fever with documented bacteremia in 11 of 20 (55 percent) and 13 of 20 (65 percent) subjects who received 103 and 104 colony forming unit (CFU) doses, respectively [9]. The overall attack rate was 59 percent. Of note, a number of volunteers developed symptoms and had S. Typhi detected in their blood stream by polymerase chain reaction testing despite negative blood cultures, suggesting a possible overall attack rate of 73 percent [10].

It is difficult to generalize data obtained in experimental inoculations to actual ingestion of contaminated food and water; extrapolations from volunteer studies suggest that 10 to 20 percent of healthy individuals ingesting 103 S. Typhi organisms will develop typhoid fever [11]. Data compiled from 12 outbreaks related to food, water, or occupational laboratory exposures showed "real life" infectious doses are usually low (<103) with relatively low attack rates (averaging 4 percent) and fairly long incubation periods (12 to 21 days) [11]. Smaller numbers of organisms are likely to induce disease in high-risk individuals, such as those with achlorhydria (including that secondary to antacid use) or immunosuppressive illnesses such as AIDS [12].

Gastrointestinal infection — After ingestion, S. Typhi organisms that survive exposure to gastric acid gain access to the small bowel, where they penetrate the epithelium, enter the lymphoid tissue, and disseminate via the lymphatic or hematogenous route.

Diarrhea and constipation appear to occur with approximately equal frequency. The reasons for the variability in enteritis among Salmonella strains are not certain. In a cell culture model of gastroenteritis, nontyphoidal Salmonella strains associated with enteritis induced IL-8-mediated neutrophil transmigration across the epithelial cell; these observations were not seen with S. Typhi or other strains not associated with enteritis [13]. The muted IL-8 response and relative absence of neutrophil infiltration seen with S. Typhi may be mediated by Toll-like receptors and require the Vi capsular polysaccharide [14].

S. Typhi access the submucosal region of the bowel by two mechanisms: via the M-cell, a specialized epithelial cell that serves as a sampling and antigen presenting cell in the mucosa (or gut)-associated lymphoid system [15]; and via direct penetration into or around the epithelial cell itself [16-18]. The entry of S. Typhi into the epithelial cell appears to be mediated by the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), the protein that is abnormal in cystic fibrosis. In one study, mice that were heterozygous for the most common CFTR mutation seen in cystic fibrosis in humans (Delta F508) translocated 86 percent fewer S. Typhi into the submucosa than wild-type mice; no translocation occurred in Delta 508 homozygous mice [19]. Genetic analyses of an Indonesian case-control cohort showed that a specific CFTR polymorphism known to affect CFTR protein expression appeared to confer modest protection against acquisition of enteric fever [20]. Thus, individuals who are heterozygous for CFTR may have a selective protection against typhoid fever.

S. Typhi proliferate in the submucosa, leading to hypertrophy of the Peyer's patches via recruitment of mononuclear cells and lymphocytes. Naïve subjects who developed typhoid fever after oral challenge had different patterns of monocyte and dendritic cell activation than those who did not develop illness [21]. Hypertrophy and subsequent necrosis of the submucosal tissues are probably responsible for abdominal pain and subsequent ileal perforation, a potentially fatal complication. Patients with enteric fever may develop "secondary" bacteremia with other organisms due to microscopic or macroscopic breaches in the intestinal mucosal barrier [22].

The potential role of typhoid toxin in disease pathogenesis is an area of investigative focus [23]. Typhoid toxin is a pyramidal holotoxin that contains a homopentamer of pertussis-like toxin B subunit (PltB) at its base, with pertussis-like toxin A (PltA; an adenosine diphosphate ribosyltransferase) in the center, and cytolethal distending toxin (CdtB; a DNase that results in cell cycle arrest) at the apex [24]. S. Typhi have uniquely evolved this toxin to adapt to humans and exclusively express the toxin while in vacuoles [25,26]. Injection of the toxin in animals causes many of the symptoms associated with enteric fever.

Systemic spread and persistence — Dissemination of S. Typhi from the Peyer's patches to the reticuloendothelial system occurs via the lymphatic system and bloodstream. Replication within the reticuloendothelial system is a hallmark of enteric fever and is responsible for the clinical findings of prostration, generalized sepsis, and hepatosplenomegaly. Some individuals contain the organism within the gastrointestinal system and do not become systemically ill but have persistent S. Typhi carriage [27,28].

Quantitative studies using density gradient separation of blood cells or buffy coat cultures from patients with typhoid fever demonstrated that S. Typhi isolated from blood cultures are frequently localized within the mononuclear cell-platelet layer [29,30]. Dissemination of the organisms via the blood stream occurs early in the course of illness; bacteremias are more frequently detected and are of higher grade during the first week of clinical illness [30].

Eventually, organisms reside within monocyte-derived or tissue macrophages in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. The bone marrow is a clinical "sanctuary" for S. Typhi and a possible source of diagnostic culture material even after the initiation of antimicrobial therapy [31,32]. These intracellular organisms are likely sources for relapsing infection and late pyogenic complications, such as pericarditis, visceral abscesses, or osteomyelitis. (See "Enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Other clinical manifestations'.)

Replete hemophagocytic macrophages may provide a niche for Salmonella persistence [33]. Acute experimentally-induced typhoid fever led to a rapid increase in the iron-regulatory hormone hepcidin and a decrease in serum iron and transferrin saturation [34]. It has also been proposed that the hemochromatosis C282Y mutation (present in up to 12.5 percent of northern and central Europeans) may confer resistance to infection with S. Typhi and mycobacteria, which require iron for growth in macrophages. Despite the total body iron overload, macrophages in C282Y homozygotes are low in iron. Hemochromatosis patients are not especially susceptible to salmonellosis or other intracellular infections, although they may be at increased risk for infection with other organisms, such as Vibrios [35,36].

Persistence of intracellular S. Typhi organisms within visceral and bone marrow macrophages has long been believed central to virulence. Molecular approaches to the study of the pathogenesis and persistence of S. Typhi have been facilitated by experiments with murine and human challenge models of typhoid fever and identified key genes and proteins [37-39]:

The phoP/phoQ genes, which modulate transcriptional activation of bacterial proteins within macrophages, are important for full virulence; deletion of these genes markedly attenuated S. Typhi in human volunteers [40].

Analysis of the S. Typhi proteome under conditions mimicking the intracellular macrophage environment identified a subset of highly expressed proteins unique to S. Typhi (versus nontyphoidal salmonellae) that likely play a role in pathogenesis and perhaps in human host specificity [41]. One protein identified was CdtB, which is the active component of the tripartite typhoid toxin that causes cell cycle arrest and DNA damage [42]. Typhoid toxin is a pyramidal holotoxin that contains a homopentamer of pertussis-like toxin B subunit (PltB) at its base, with pertussis-like toxin A (PltA; an adenosine diphosphate ribosyltransferase) in the center, and CdtB at the apex [24]. The potential role of typhoid toxin in disease pathogenesis is an area of investigative focus [23]. S. Typhi have uniquely evolved this toxin to adapt to humans and exclusively express the toxin while in vacuoles [25,26]. Injection of the toxin in animals causes many of the symptoms associated with enteric fever. In a human challenge model, individuals receiving a typhoid toxin deletion mutant, had a higher incidence of infection, shorter time to diagnosis, and longer duration of bacteremia compared with an isogenic wild-type strain [43]. These findings suggest that typhoid toxin is not essential for S. Typhi infection and might be important in modulating host immune responses

Deletion of genes that facilitate colonization of deep tissues (cdt) [44], modulate adenylate cyclase levels (cya/crp) [45], or encode the synthesis of essential nutrients, such as purines (purA) [46] or aromatic amino acids (aroC/aroD) [45], also results in strains that are significantly attenuated in humans.

In contrast, deletion of the Vi capsular polysaccharide (a protective polysaccharide antigen that serves as a parenteral typhoid fever vaccine [47,48]) did not result in significant attenuation of orally administered S. Typhi in volunteers [49]. Also, phenotypically Vi-negative isolates do cause typhoid fever [50], and Paratyphi A strains, which uniformly lack Vi, cause a clinical syndrome nearly indistinguishable from typhoid.

Both S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A appear to contain a Type VI secretion system (T6SS) that may give these typhoidal Salmonella a survival advantage against competing bacteria within the human gut [51].

Several S. Typhi mutants are currently being investigated as live vaccines for typhoid fever [40,44,46] and as vector microorganisms for delivery of other antigens to the gastrointestinal mucosal immune system.

Compared with S. Typhi, less is known about pathogenesis of Salmonella Paratyphi A, which lacks Vi polysaccharide, but does produce typhoid toxin. Evidence suggests that its long lipopolysaccharide O-antigen chains reduce inflammasome activation and pyroptosis, a form of programmed cell death, during infection of macrophages, a distinct mechanism of immune evasion from S. Typhi [52].

Host immunity/species specificity — Host immunologic defects, such as depressed cell-mediated immunity (eg, AIDS, glucocorticoid therapy) and altered phagocyte function (eg, sickle cell anemia, malaria), have not been associated with more severe or complicated typhoid infection [53,54]. In contrast, a variety of host immunologic defects are known to predispose to more severe and complicated illness due to nontyphoidal salmonellosis. (See "Pathogenesis of Salmonella gastroenteritis".)

There is some evidence that immunocompromised patients fare poorly with typhoidal infections, however. One study of four individuals with AIDS in Peru described atypically severe diarrhea or colitis [12]. Other case reports have documented unusual manifestations of S. Typhi infection, such as arteritis [55] or chorioamnionitis [56], in HIV-infected patients. Toll-like receptor 4 mutations might increase susceptibility to typhoid [57]; in contrast, variants in HLA-DRB1 appear to be associated with resistance to enteric fever [58]. Additionally, work from a human challenge model demonstrated that, in contrast to high titers of antibodies against S. Typhi, high levels of S. Typhi-responsive CD4 cells actually increase risk of developing typhoid disease upon exposure [59].

It has long been known that S. Typhi and Paratyphi A are uniquely human pathogens that do not affect other mammals (including laboratory mice), unlike nontyphoidal salmonellae. This appears to be related to fundamental differences in the way the innate and adaptive immune systems interact with these related organisms. Attempts at altering mice to render then susceptible to S. Typhi have been made. For instance, humanized mice (immunodeficient Rag2-/- γC-/- mice engrafted with human fetal liver hematopoietic cells or human umbilical cord stem cells) can be made susceptible to infection with S. Typhi [60,61]. Additionally, Rab GTPases, the recruitment of which are blocked in Salmonella Typhimurium, play a role in restricting growth of typhoidal Salmonella in nonhuman hosts [62]. These models recapitulate some important clinical features of human enteric fever and may be of some value for preliminary testing of typhoid vaccines.

With regard to the antigenic target associated with protective immunity in humans, IgG antibodies to the Vi polysaccharide have been shown to correlate with protection from infection and clinical disease in vaccine studies and controlled human challenge models [63-65]. However, protection from Vi-containing vaccines is incomplete; similarly, reinfection may occur following natural infection. Also, oral vaccination with an attenuated strain of S. Typhi (Ty21a) protects against typhoid fever even though Ty21a does not express Vi antigen. Bactericidal antibodies to O lipopolysaccharide (O-LPS) have also been shown to reduce disease severity but did not prevent infection [66]. In experimental challenge models, previous infection with S. Typhi provides some protection from rechallenge with S. Typhi, but no protection against heterologous challenge with S. Paratyphi A, and vice versa [67].

Chronic carriage — Chronic Salmonella carriage is defined as excretion of the organism in stool or urine >12 months after acute infection. Chronic carriage occurs more frequently in adult women and in patients with cholelithiasis or other biliary tract abnormalities [68,69]. (See "Enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis", section on 'Chronic carriers'.)

Gallstones may serve as a persistent nidus of infection [68,69]. Gallstone biofilm has been observed in humans and mice, which appears to facilitate gallbladder colonization and shedding [70]. In animal and in vitro models, S. Typhi exposure to bile appears to induce formation of specific bacterial polysaccharide components that contribute to biofilm formation, and flagellar proteins may enhance bacterial adherence [71,72]. In rare cases, chronic carriage has been observed to persist even after antibiotic therapy and cholecystectomy, suggesting that factors other than biliary abnormalities may also contribute to the carrier state [73]. Urinary carriage is rare (3 percent of carriers) and is associated with nephrolithiasis and urinary tract abnormalities [74,75]. In areas where schistosomiasis is highly endemic, rates of urinary carriage can be higher [76].

In general, chronic carriers do not develop recurrent symptomatic disease. They appear to reach an immunologic equilibrium in which they are chronically colonized and may excrete large numbers of organisms, but have a high level of immunity and do not develop clinical disease [3,77-79]. Chronic carriers frequently have high serum antibody titers against the Vi antigen; some studies have found Vi serology to be a useful test for rapid identification of such patients [80,81], while others have not [82]. Immune responses targeting the protein YncE have been identified to identify chronic carriers in Nepal; additional investigation is required to further evaluate the utility of this marker [83]. Susceptibility to colonization with S. Typhi may also be related to blood group antigens [69]. S. Typhi may undergo substantial evolution during carriage, dropping genes responsible for Vi production, replicating more slowly in culture, and forming significantly thicker biofilms, compared with reference strains [84,85].

The S. Typhi carrier state may be an independent risk factor for carcinoma of the gallbladder as well as other cancers [86,87], perhaps as a result of activating MAPK and AKT pathways [88]. (See "Gallbladder cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and diagnosis".)

Chronic carriage may also result from infection with S. Paratyphi strains, which has been isolated from Nepalese cholecystectomy samples almost as frequently as S. Typhi. [89]. (See "Nontyphoidal Salmonella: Gastrointestinal infection and asymptomatic carriage".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topic (see "Patient education: Enteric (typhoid and paratyphoid) fever (The Basics)")

SUMMARY

Ingested Salmonella Typhi organisms survive exposure to gastric acid before gaining access to the small bowel, where they penetrate the epithelium, enter the lymphoid tissue, and disseminate via the lymphatic or hematogenous route. A chronic carrier state is established in a minority of cases. (See 'Pathogenesis' above.)

In general, the greater the S. Typhi infectious dose, the higher the attack rate and the shorter the incubation period. Infectious doses are usually low (<103) with relatively low attack rates (averaging 4 percent) and fairly long incubation periods (12 to 21 days). (See 'Infectious dose' above.)

Dissemination of S. Typhi from the Peyer's patches to the reticuloendothelial system occurs via the lymphatic system and bloodstream. Eventually, organisms reside within tissue macrophages in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. These intracellular organisms are likely sources for relapsing infection and late pyogenic complications. (See 'Systemic spread and persistence' above.)

Host immunologic defects such as depressed cell-mediated immunity and altered phagocyte function have not generally been associated with more severe or complicated typhoid infection. However, there is some evidence that immunocompromised patients fare poorly with typhoidal infections. (See 'Host immunity/species specificity' above.)

Chronic carriage occurs more frequently in women and in patients with cholelithiasis or other biliary tract abnormalities. S. Typhi exposure to bile appears to induce formation of specific bacterial polysaccharide components that contribute to biofilm formation, and flagellar proteins may enhance bacterial adherence. (See 'Chronic carriage' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Elizabeth L Hohmann, MD, and Edward T Ryan, MD, DTMH, who contributed to earlier versions of this topic review.

  1. Parry CM, Hien TT, Dougan G, et al. Typhoid fever. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1770.
  2. Vollaard AM, Ali S, Widjaja S, et al. Identification of typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever cases at presentation in outpatient clinics in Jakarta, Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2005; 99:440.
  3. Dham SK, Thompson RA. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in chronic typhoid carriers. Clin Exp Immunol 1982; 50:34.
  4. Levine MM, Black RE, Lanata C. Precise estimation of the numbers of chronic carriers of Salmonella typhi in Santiago, Chile, an endemic area. J Infect Dis 1982; 146:724.
  5. da Silva KE, Tanmoy AM, Pragasam AK, et al. The international and intercontinental spread and expansion of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella Typhi: a genomic epidemiology study. Lancet Microbe 2022; 3:e567.
  6. Chiou CS, Wei HL, Mu JJ, et al. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi variants in long-term carriers. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:669.
  7. Holt KE, Thomson NR, Wain J, et al. Pseudogene accumulation in the evolutionary histories of Salmonella enterica serovars Paratyphi A and Typhi. BMC Genomics 2009; 10:36.
  8. Waddington CS, Darton TC, Woodward WE, et al. Advancing the management and control of typhoid fever: a review of the historical role of human challenge studies. J Infect 2014; 68:405.
  9. Waddington CS, Darton TC, Jones C, et al. An outpatient, ambulant-design, controlled human infection model using escalating doses of Salmonella Typhi challenge delivered in sodium bicarbonate solution. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 58:1230.
  10. Darton TC, Zhou L, Blohmke CJ, et al. Blood culture-PCR to optimise typhoid fever diagnosis after controlled human infection identifies frequent asymptomatic cases and evidence of primary bacteraemia. J Infect 2017; 74:358.
  11. Blaser MJ, Newman LS. A review of human salmonellosis: I. Infective dose. Rev Infect Dis 1982; 4:1096.
  12. Gotuzzo E, Frisancho O, Sanchez J, et al. Association between the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and infection with Salmonella typhi or Salmonella paratyphi in an endemic typhoid area. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:381.
  13. McCormick BA, Miller SI, Carnes D, Madara JL. Transepithelial signaling to neutrophils by salmonellae: a novel virulence mechanism for gastroenteritis. Infect Immun 1995; 63:2302.
  14. Raffatellu M, Chessa D, Wilson RP, et al. The Vi capsular antigen of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi reduces Toll-like receptor-dependent interleukin-8 expression in the intestinal mucosa. Infect Immun 2005; 73:3367.
  15. Kohbata S, Yokoyama H, Yabuuchi E. Cytopathogenic effect of Salmonella typhi GIFU 10007 on M cells of murine ileal Peyer's patches in ligated ileal loops: an ultrastructural study. Microbiol Immunol 1986; 30:1225.
  16. Kops SK, Lowe DK, Bement WM, West AB. Migration of Salmonella typhi through intestinal epithelial monolayers: an in vitro study. Microbiol Immunol 1996; 40:799.
  17. Mills SD, Finlay BB. Comparison of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella typhimurium invasion, intracellular growth and localization in cultured human epithelial cells. Microb Pathog 1994; 17:409.
  18. Tartera C, Metcalf ES. Osmolarity and growth phase overlap in regulation of Salmonella typhi adherence to and invasion of human intestinal cells. Infect Immun 1993; 61:3084.
  19. Pier GB, Grout M, Zaidi T, et al. Salmonella typhi uses CFTR to enter intestinal epithelial cells. Nature 1998; 393:79.
  20. van de Vosse E, de Visser AW, Al-Attar S, et al. Distribution of CFTR variations in an Indonesian enteric fever cohort. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:1231.
  21. Toapanta FR, Bernal PJ, Fresnay S, et al. Oral Wild-Type Salmonella Typhi Challenge Induces Activation of Circulating Monocytes and Dendritic Cells in Individuals Who Develop Typhoid Disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9:e0003837.
  22. Hoffman SL, Punjabi NH, Kumala S, et al. Reduction of mortality in chloramphenicol-treated severe typhoid fever by high-dose dexamethasone. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:82.
  23. Galán JE. Typhoid toxin provides a window into typhoid fever and the biology of Salmonella Typhi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:6338.
  24. Fowler CC, Chang SJ, Gao X, et al. Emerging insights into the biology of typhoid toxin. Curr Opin Microbiol 2017; 35:70.
  25. Gao X, Deng L, Stack G, et al. Evolution of host adaptation in the Salmonella typhoid toxin. Nat Microbiol 2017; 2:1592.
  26. Fowler CC, Galán JE. Decoding a Salmonella Typhi Regulatory Network that Controls Typhoid Toxin Expression within Human Cells. Cell Host Microbe 2018; 23:65.
  27. Hornick RB, Greisman SE, Woodward TE, et al. Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control. N Engl J Med 1970; 283:686.
  28. Meals RA. Paratyphoid fever: a report of 62 cases with several unusual findings and a review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1976; 136:1422.
  29. Rubin FA, McWhirter PD, Burr D, et al. Rapid diagnosis of typhoid fever through identification of Salmonella typhi within 18 hours of specimen acquisition by culture of the mononuclear cell-platelet fraction of blood. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:825.
  30. Wain J, Diep TS, Ho VA, et al. Quantitation of bacteria in blood of typhoid fever patients and relationship between counts and clinical features, transmissibility, and antibiotic resistance. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36:1683.
  31. Gasem MH, Dolmans WM, Isbandrio BB, et al. Culture of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi from blood and bone marrow in suspected typhoid fever. Trop Geogr Med 1995; 47:164.
  32. Guerra-Caceres JG, Gotuzzo-Herencia E, Crosby-Dagnino E, et al. Diagnostic value of bone marrow culture in typhoid fever. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1979; 73:680.
  33. Nix RN, Altschuler SE, Henson PM, Detweiler CS. Hemophagocytic macrophages harbor Salmonella enterica during persistent infection. PLoS Pathog 2007; 3:e193.
  34. Darton TC, Blohmke CJ, Giannoulatou E, et al. Rapidly Escalating Hepcidin and Associated Serum Iron Starvation Are Features of the Acute Response to Typhoid Infection in Humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9:e0004029.
  35. Weinberg ED. Survival advantage of the hemochromatosis C282Y mutation. Perspect Biol Med 2008; 51:98.
  36. Moalem S, Weinberg ED, Percy ME. Hemochromatosis and the enigma of misplaced iron: implications for infectious disease and survival. Biometals 2004; 17:135.
  37. Fields PI, Swanson RV, Haidaris CG, Heffron F. Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium that cannot survive within the macrophage are avirulent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986; 83:5189.
  38. Groisman EA, Chiao E, Lipps CJ, Heffron F. Salmonella typhimurium phoP virulence gene is a transcriptional regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:7077.
  39. Miller SI, Kukral AM, Mekalanos JJ. A two-component regulatory system (phoP phoQ) controls Salmonella typhimurium virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:5054.
  40. Hohmann EL, Oletta CA, Killeen KP, Miller SI. phoP/phoQ-deleted Salmonella typhi (Ty800) is a safe and immunogenic single-dose typhoid fever vaccine in volunteers. J Infect Dis 1996; 173:1408.
  41. Ansong C, Yoon H, Norbeck AD, et al. Proteomics analysis of the causative agent of typhoid fever. J Proteome Res 2008; 7:546.
  42. Spanò S, Ugalde JE, Galán JE. Delivery of a Salmonella Typhi exotoxin from a host intracellular compartment. Cell Host Microbe 2008; 3:30.
  43. Gibani MM, Jones E, Barton A, et al. Investigation of the role of typhoid toxin in acute typhoid fever in a human challenge model. Nat Med 2019; 25:1082.
  44. Nardelli-Haefliger D, Kraehenbuhl JP, Curtiss R 3rd, et al. Oral and rectal immunization of adult female volunteers with a recombinant attenuated Salmonella typhi vaccine strain. Infect Immun 1996; 64:5219.
  45. Tacket CO, Hone DM, Curtiss R 3rd, et al. Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of delta aroC delta aroD and delta cya delta crp Salmonella typhi strains in adult volunteers. Infect Immun 1992; 60:536.
  46. Levine MM, Herrington D, Murphy JR, et al. Safety, infectivity, immunogenicity, and in vivo stability of two attenuated auxotrophic mutant strains of Salmonella typhi, 541Ty and 543Ty, as live oral vaccines in humans. J Clin Invest 1987; 79:888.
  47. Acharya IL, Lowe CU, Thapa R, et al. Prevention of typhoid fever in Nepal with the Vi capsular polysaccharide of Salmonella typhi. A preliminary report. N Engl J Med 1987; 317:1101.
  48. Plotkin SA, Bouveret-Le Cam N. A new typhoid vaccine composed of the Vi capsular polysaccharide. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:2293.
  49. Hone DM, Attridge SR, Forrest B, et al. A galE via (Vi antigen-negative) mutant of Salmonella typhi Ty2 retains virulence in humans. Infect Immun 1988; 56:1326.
  50. Pulickal AS, Callaghan MJ, Kelly DF, et al. Prevalence and genetic analysis of phenotypically Vi- negative Salmonella typhi isolates in children from Kathmandu, Nepal. J Trop Pediatr 2013; 59:317.
  51. Barretto LAF, Fowler CC. Identification of A Putative T6SS Immunity Islet in Salmonella Typhi. Pathogens 2020; 9.
  52. Mylona E, Sanchez-Garrido J, Hoang Thu TN, et al. Very long O-antigen chains of Salmonella Paratyphi A inhibit inflammasome activation and pyroptotic cell death. Cell Microbiol 2021; 23:e13306.
  53. Levine MM, Farag TH. Invasive salmonella infections and HIV in Northern Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:349.
  54. Crump JA, Ramadhani HO, Morrissey AB, et al. Invasive bacterial and fungal infections among hospitalized HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected adults and adolescents in northern Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:341.
  55. Houston S. Salmonella typhi bacteremia and HIV infection with common iliac artery occlusion. Cent Afr J Med 1994; 40:48.
  56. Hedriana HL, Mitchell JL, Williams SB. Salmonella typhi chorioamnionitis in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected pregnant woman. A case report. J Reprod Med 1995; 40:157.
  57. Nguyen TH, Mai NL, Le TP, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and typhoid fever in Vietnam. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4800.
  58. Dunstan SJ, Hue NT, Han B, et al. Variation at HLA-DRB1 is associated with resistance to enteric fever. Nat Genet 2014; 46:1333.
  59. Fresnay S, McArthur MA, Magder LS, et al. Importance of Salmonella Typhi-Responsive CD8+ T Cell Immunity in a Human Typhoid Fever Challenge Model. Front Immunol 2017; 8:208.
  60. Song J, Willinger T, Rongvaux A, et al. A mouse model for the human pathogen Salmonella typhi. Cell Host Microbe 2010; 8:369.
  61. Firoz Mian M, Pek EA, Chenoweth MJ, Ashkar AA. Humanized mice are susceptible to Salmonella typhi infection. Cell Mol Immunol 2011; 8:83.
  62. Spanò S, Gao X, Hannemann S, et al. A Bacterial Pathogen Targets a Host Rab-Family GTPase Defense Pathway with a GAP. Cell Host Microbe 2016; 19:216.
  63. Lin FY, Ho VA, Khiem HB, et al. The efficacy of a Salmonella typhi Vi conjugate vaccine in two-to-five-year-old children. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1263.
  64. Thiem VD, Lin FY, Canh DG, et al. The Vi conjugate typhoid vaccine is safe, elicits protective levels of IgG anti-Vi, and is compatible with routine infant vaccines. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2011; 18:730.
  65. Jin C, Gibani MM, Moore M, et al. Efficacy and immunogenicity of a Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in the prevention of typhoid fever using a controlled human infection model of Salmonella Typhi: a randomised controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet 2017; 390:2472.
  66. Juel HB, Thomaides-Brears HB, Darton TC, et al. Salmonella Typhi Bactericidal Antibodies Reduce Disease Severity but Do Not Protect against Typhoid Fever in a Controlled Human Infection Model. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1916.
  67. Gibani MM, Jin C, Shrestha S, et al. Homologous and heterologous re-challenge with Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A in a randomised controlled human infection model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020; 14:e0008783.
  68. Lai CW, Chan RC, Cheng AF, et al. Common bile duct stones: a cause of chronic salmonellosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87:1198.
  69. Hofmann E, Chianale J, Rollán A, et al. Blood group antigen secretion and gallstone disease in the Salmonella typhi chronic carrier state. J Infect Dis 1993; 167:993.
  70. Crawford RW, Rosales-Reyes R, Ramírez-Aguilar Mde L, et al. Gallstones play a significant role in Salmonella spp. gallbladder colonization and carriage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:4353.
  71. Crawford RW, Gibson DL, Kay WW, Gunn JS. Identification of a bile-induced exopolysaccharide required for Salmonella biofilm formation on gallstone surfaces. Infect Immun 2008; 76:5341.
  72. Crawford RW, Reeve KE, Gunn JS. Flagellated but not hyperfimbriated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium attaches to and forms biofilms on cholesterol-coated surfaces. J Bacteriol 2010; 192:2981.
  73. Ristori C, Rodríguez H, Vicent P, et al. Persistence of the Salmonella typhi-paratyphi carrier state after gallbladder removal. Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1982; 16:361.
  74. Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28:901.
  75. VOGELSANG TM, BØE J. Temporary and chronic carriers of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi B. J Hyg (Lond) 1948; 46:252.
  76. Hsiao A, Toy T, Seo HJ, Marks F. Interaction between Salmonella and Schistosomiasis: A Review. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005928.
  77. MERSELIS JG Jr, KAYE D, CONNOLLY CS, HOOK EW. QUANTITATIVE BACTERIOLOGY OF THE TYPHOID CARRIER STATE. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1964; 13:425.
  78. Taylor DN, Pollard RA, Blake PA. Typhoid in the United States and the risk to the international traveler. J Infect Dis 1983; 148:599.
  79. Høj L, Binder V, Espersen F, et al. Secretion rates of immunoglobulins, albumin, haptoglobin and complement factors C3 and C4 in the perfused jejunum and ileum of human Salmonella carriers. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand C 1984; 92:129.
  80. Lanata CF, Levine MM, Ristori C, et al. Vi serology in detection of chronic Salmonella typhi carriers in an endemic area. Lancet 1983; 2:441.
  81. Lin FY, Becke JM, Groves C, et al. Restaurant-associated outbreak of typhoid fever in Maryland: identification of carrier facilitated by measurement of serum Vi antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26:1194.
  82. Gupta A, My Thanh NT, Olsen SJ, et al. Evaluation of community-based serologic screening for identification of chronic Salmonella typhi carriers in Vietnam. Int J Infect Dis 2006; 10:309.
  83. Charles RC, Sultana T, Alam MM, et al. Identification of immunogenic Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi antigens expressed in chronic biliary carriers of S. Typhi in Kathmandu, Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7:e2335.
  84. Thanh Duy P, Thieu NTV, Nguyen Thi Nguyen T, et al. Gallbladder carriage generates genetic variation and genome degradation in Salmonella Typhi. PLoS Pathog 2020; 16:e1008998.
  85. Devaraj A, González JF, Eichar B, et al. Enhanced biofilm and extracellular matrix production by chronic carriage versus acute isolates of Salmonella Typhi. PLoS Pathog 2021; 17:e1009209.
  86. Caygill CP, Braddick M, Hill MJ, et al. The association between typhoid carriage, typhoid infection and subsequent cancer at a number of sites. Eur J Cancer Prev 1995; 4:187.
  87. Nagaraja V, Eslick GD. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the relationship between chronic Salmonella typhi carrier status and gall-bladder cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 39:745.
  88. Scanu T, Spaapen RM, Bakker JM, et al. Salmonella Manipulation of Host Signaling Pathways Provokes Cellular Transformation Associated with Gallbladder Carcinoma. Cell Host Microbe 2015; 17:763.
  89. Dongol S, Thompson CN, Clare S, et al. The microbiological and clinical characteristics of invasive salmonella in gallbladders from cholecystectomy patients in kathmandu, Nepal. PLoS One 2012; 7:e47342.
Topic 2703 Version 28.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟