ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Dengue virus infection: Epidemiology

Dengue virus infection: Epidemiology
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Oct 20, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Records of dengue-like illness date back more than 200 years and the viral etiology of dengue virus (DENV) was established in the 1940s [1,2]. Major changes in the epidemiology of dengue virus infections began after World War II, and geographic expansion of transmission has continued to date. Given estimates of 390 million infections worldwide each year and over 2.5 billion individuals at daily risk for infection [3], the DENVs remain important arthropod-borne viruses from a medical and public health perspective.

The cardinal features of the DENV transmission cycle, the characteristics of the mosquito vectors, and the factors that contribute to DENV transmission in the major affected regions will be reviewed here. The pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of DENV infection are discussed separately. (See "Dengue virus infection: Pathogenesis" and "Dengue virus infection: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and "Dengue virus infection: Prevention and treatment".)

CLASSIFICATION — Dengue viruses are members of the family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus [4,5]. The DENV complex comprises at least four antigenically related but distinct viruses, designated DENV types 1 through 4. All DENVs are mosquito-borne human pathogens that exclusively cause acute infection.

TRANSMISSION CYCLE — Both epidemic and endemic transmissions of the DENVs are maintained through a human-mosquito-human cycle involving mosquitoes of the genus Aedes (Stegomyia) [6]. Transmission of DENVs between mosquitoes and nonhuman primates has been demonstrated in Asia and Africa, but spillover from sylvatic transmission does not appear to be an important driver of viral transmission to humans [6,7].

Susceptible humans become infected after an infected female Aedes mosquito takes a human blood meal. Viremia in humans begins toward the end of a four- to six-day incubation period and persists until around the time fever abates, which is typically three to seven days [8,9]. An uninfected Aedes mosquito may acquire the virus from an infected human if they feed during this time and the human viremia is of sufficient titer to support mosquito infection. The incubation period within the mosquito is 8 to 12 days; after this period, it can transmit the virus to humans. Once infected, mosquitoes may carry the virus for their lifespan and remain infective.

MOSQUITO VECTORS — Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti mosquitoes, the principal vector for the transmission of the DENVs, have many characteristics that make them ideal for dissemination of the virus [6,10]. Ae. aegypti typically breed in or close to houses, laying eggs in both man-made and natural water containers. The typical flight distance is relatively short [11]. Ae. aegypti are preferentially daytime feeders, and their feeding episodes often go unnoticed. They are easily interrupted in their feeding and often move on to another host, frequently taking multiple blood meals in a single breeding cycle [12]. Thus, an infected Ae. aegypti mosquito may transmit a DENV to several individuals within the household. For these reasons, family members who are at home during the daytime, typically women and young children, are at particularly high risk for exposure and infection.

Ae. aegypti are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical areas from latitude 45ºNorth to 35ºSouth. Yellow fever is also principally transmitted by Ae. aegypti; efforts to control urban yellow fever in the Americas in the 1940s greatly restricted the distribution of the mosquitoes in the Western hemisphere, but the mosquitoes have since reinfested nearly all of their former habitats [8].

Ae. albopictus mosquitoes are also a competent vector for the transmission of the DENVs under both experimental and natural conditions [6,13]. Ae. albopictus species are more tolerant of the cold and have a wider geographic distribution than Ae. aegypti [13,14]. However, they are less likely to transmit virus since they do not feed on humans as frequently as Ae. aegypti and appear to be less efficient natural vectors for the DENVs. Endemic transmission or large outbreaks in regions that have Ae. albopictus but not Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are rare. Both Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti are also competent vectors for transmission of zika and chikungunya viruses; their ability to transmit both the dengue and chikungunya viruses has led to simultaneous outbreaks of both diseases in some areas [15]. (See "Chikungunya fever: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis".)

Other Aedes mosquitoes have been suspected of DENV transmission in isolated outbreaks in certain Pacific islands [16]. However, these species appear to play an insignificant role in the global transmission of dengue.

DISTRIBUTION OF DENGUE VIRUSES AND THEIR VECTORS — Ae. aegypti and the DENVs are endemic in many countries, as shown on the online map maintained by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [5,17-19]. The risk for exposure to Ae. aegypti is often increased in urban areas. Many tourist residencies present a lower risk of mosquito exposure than local residential areas because of air conditioning, less standing water, grounds keeping, elevation, or combinations of these factors. The effect of climate change on Ae. mosquito habitats and associated arboviral disease epidemiology in human populations is under investigation [20].

The number of cases of dengue fever (DF) and DHF varies, on a global scale from year to year, although the overall trend is one of increasing incidence. Periodic shifts in the ratio of clinically symptomatic to asymptomatic infections occur at varying intervals of several years [21,22].

The reported dengue activity in specific regions is described further below. Most available information is gathered through passive surveillance activities and must be interpreted cautiously in light of underreporting of cases [23,24] and lack of laboratory confirmation. The United States CDC maintains a listing of global dengue activity (https://www.cdc.gov/dengue/areaswithrisk/around-the-world.html).

Asia and Pacific

Southeast Asia — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are present throughout the region, extending to southern China and the south of the island of Taiwan, and all countries in the region are affected by DENV infection [25]. Hyperendemic transmission of all four DENV types (with cases of DHF) has occurred in Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia for over 40 years. Epidemic dengue reemerged in China during the 1980s and 1990s after an absence of several decades and was associated with the first occurrence of DHF in that country [26]. A review of epidemiologic trends between 1980 and 2010 indicated increasing incidence of DENV infection, with annual average percentage change of 6 percent in Thailand, 10 percent in Vietnam, 12 percent in Indonesia, 18 percent in Malaysia, and 24 percent in the Philippines [27].

Over 140 locally acquired cases of dengue were detected in Japan in 2014, representing the first occurrence of transmission in that nation since World War II [28,29]. More than 80 percent of cases were associated with visiting a single location in Tokyo, and Ae. albopictus was the apparent vector in this outbreak.

Dengue virus transmission occurs year round but typically reaches a seasonal peak that varies in timing between countries (for example, between June and November in Thailand, between January and February in Indonesia). More than 200,000 cases of DHF were reported from the region each year since 2010, with the exception of 2011 (177,500 cases); Indonesia and Thailand accounted for the majority of cases in each of these years. A completed dengue vaccine trial in Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam demonstrated significant reporting differences between national surveillance systems and the trial's active case finding [30].

South Asia — Ae. aegypti are widely distributed in India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Dengue virus transmission, particularly in India and Sri Lanka, increased substantially over the past several decades [25]. Hyperendemic circulation of all four DENV types appears to be established, and outbreaks of DHF have become more frequent. Over 180,000 cases were reported from India in 2017, more than twice the average over the previous decade. A seroprevalence study among children living in India conducted between January 2011 and October 2012 noted rates of seropositivity between 60 and 80 percent [30,31].

Western Pacific islands — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are present in most of the region. High incidence rates of dengue have been reported from several island nations, including American Samoa, Cook Islands, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, and Tonga [32,33]. (See "Potential health hazards in travelers to Australia, New Zealand, and the southwestern Pacific (Oceania)".)

Australia — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are present in the northeastern corner of Australia. Dengue viruses are not endemic to the continent, but periodic introduction of dengue viruses from neighboring islands has led to epidemics in urban areas of north Queensland [34,35]. In Australia in 2013 to 2014, 212 dengue virus infections were acquired in Australia and 1795 cases were acquired overseas [36]. (See "Potential health hazards in travelers to Australia, New Zealand, and the southwestern Pacific (Oceania)".)

Africa and Eastern Mediterranean — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are present in much of sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East. Data are scant on DENV transmission [24,37,38]. However, documented infections in visitors to the area indicate that there is ongoing dengue virus transmission [39,40]. Several outbreaks were reported from Central Africa, East Africa, and the Middle East during the 1990s and 2000s [15,17].

A systematic review of records from Middle East and North African countries identified 81 outbreaks reported from 9 countries between 1941 and 2015; Ae. aegypti and/or Ae. albopictus are present in 15 countries [41].

Europe — Ae. albopictus is present across much of southern Europe [42]. Most dengue cases reported from the region have been acquired during travel to endemic countries. However, local transmission of dengue virus was documented in both southern France and Croatia in 2010 [43]. In 2012, an outbreak of dengue was reported on Madeira Island (Portugal), associated with the presence of Ae. aegypti [43]. Five locally acquired cases were confirmed in Spain in 2018 [44] and another five in northeast Italy in 2020, the first locally acquired cases in that country [45].

Americas — Dengue cases declined by over 50 percent in 2017 and 2018, following the epidemic transmission of zika virus. Dengue cases rebounded in 2019, however, and the region experienced the highest number of dengue cases ever recorded.

North America — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are present in most areas of Mexico and in the southern United States. Ae. albopictus is also present in Mexico and the southern United States; however, its range extends farther north, nearly to the Great Lakes.

In Mexico, hyperendemic transmission of all four DENV serotypes is present throughout the range of Ae. aegypti. Dengue virus transmission is seasonal, with peak activity in late summer and fall. In 2019, over 268,000 cases of dengue infection were reported from Mexico, including more than 3,500 cases of severe dengue and 421 deaths [21].

The southern United States is an ideal setting for the introduction and spread of dengue virus, given the widespread presence of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, the appropriate environmental conditions for transmission, and the large volume of travelers arriving from Latin America and the Caribbean, where dengue is endemic [46].

In 2022, the CDC reported 1188 cases in the United States (50 states and the District of Columbia), with 67 being locally acquired (65 in Florida and 2 in Arizona) [47]. Between 2010 and 2017, 5387 dengue cases were reported from the United States; 93 percent were travel associated [48]. Locally acquired cases were reported from Hawaii, Florida, Texas, and New York (case counts were 250, 103, 24, and 1, respectively). In 2010, DF was reported in 28 residents of Key West, Florida, who had not traveled abroad [49], and a serosurvey of 240 participants living in Key West found that 5 percent had evidence of recent dengue infection. Local transmission of dengue virus continues to occur in south Florida.

There was an outbreak of dengue in Hawaii between 2015 and 2016 [50]. The Hawaii Department of Health reported a total of 264 cases were confirmed, with 26 being in travelers and the remainder Hawaiian residents. These were the first cases in Hawaii since 2011 [51].

Central America — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and hyperendemic transmission of all four DENV types are present throughout the region. The region experienced a major outbreak in 2019; Nicaragua and Honduras reported among the highest numbers of cases of dengue (186,000 and 132,000, respectively) and incidence rates (over 1000 cases per 100,000 population) that year [21]. However, all of these countries have had one or more years of heavy dengue activity during the past decade. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) reported over 63,000 laboratory-confirmed cases in Central America and Mexico during 2019; underreporting is suspected to be considerable.

Caribbean — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are present throughout the region. Hyperendemic circulation of DENV types 1, 2, and 4 has been present on the larger islands (other than Cuba) for several decades, and DENV type 3 has been present since 1998. In Puerto Rico, peak DENV transmission usually occurs between October and December; over 21,000 cases of DENV infection were reported there in 2010, representing the largest outbreak ever recorded [33]. The Dominican Republic (20,000 cases), Jamaica (7500 cases), Guadeloupe (3000 cases), Cuba (3000 cases), and Martinique (1500 cases) all reported major outbreaks in 2019 [21]. Other islands have experienced periodic dengue epidemics.

South America — Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are present in every South American country except Chile [17]. Hyperendemic circulation of all four DENV types has been present in the north of the continent since the reintroduction of DENV serotype 3 was detected in Brazil and Venezuela during 2000. According to PAHO, Brazil and Colombia reported the largest number of confirmed dengue cases in 2019. Low-level year-round transmission has been observed, but most cases follow an epidemic pattern; in Brazil, peak dengue transmission occurs between February and May [52].

Brazil experienced major outbreaks in 2019 and 2022, with over 2 million cases nationwide in each year, including over 1400 cases of severe dengue [21]. Colombia (127,000 cases) also reported a major dengue outbreak in 2019. According to PAHO, the Andean and Southern cone of South America reported over 1.2 million laboratory-confirmed cases in 2022, of which more than 95 percent occurred in Brazil.

PATTERNS OF TRANSMISSION — Dengue virus transmission follows two general (but not mutually exclusive) patterns, with different implications for disease risk in both the local population and travelers.

Sporadic/Epidemic dengue — Sporadic DENV transmission occurs when the introduction of DENV into a region is an isolated event involving a single virus strain. If sufficiently large populations of susceptible hosts and mosquitoes are present, transmission of DENVs is explosive, leading to a recognizable epidemic. The incidence of infection among susceptible individuals often reaches 25 to 50 percent [53] and can be considerably higher. Herd immunity, changes in weather, and mosquito control efforts can all contribute to the termination of the epidemic [6].

Prior to World War II, transmission of DENVs almost exclusively followed this pattern [54]. Seaports frequently were the point of initial introduction of DENVs, and these port cities then acted as distribution points to nearby inland areas.

In smaller island nations, certain areas of South America and Africa, and in the areas of Asia where DENV transmission has reemerged, epidemic activity is the predominant pattern of DENV transmission. The incidence of DENV infections in these locations varies considerably from year to year. Intervals of several years or more usually pass between epidemics, allowing the number of susceptible individuals to accumulate so that the next epidemic can be perpetuated.

In the setting of epidemic transmission, adults and children in the local population are affected. Among travelers, the risk for DENV acquisition is high during an epidemic but low at other times. The frequency of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is usually low, with some exceptions [55]. The DENV type and strain and the interval since the previous epidemic seem to influence the risk for DHF. (See "Dengue virus infection: Pathogenesis".)

Hyperendemic dengue — "Hyperendemic" transmission refers to the continuous circulation of multiple DENV types in the same area. This requires the year-round presence of competent vector mosquitoes and either a large population or steady movement of individuals into the area to maintain a pool of susceptible individuals. Hyperendemic circulation involves the occurrence of multiple epidemics in a smaller geographic scale (eg, village or school) [56].

Seasonal variation in virus transmission is common. The incidence of infection also varies from year to year, with increased DENV transmission at intervals of three to four years, but this variation is not as dramatic as in areas where transmission predominantly follows the epidemic pattern. A mathematical analysis of data from Thailand suggested that these surges in DENV transmission originate in waves from major urban centers [57].

Areas with hyperendemic DENV transmission contribute to the majority of cases of DENV infection globally. In some regions, 5 to 10 percent of the susceptible population experiences DENV infection annually [58-60]. Urban areas are particularly affected.

In the setting of hyperendemic transmission, the prevalence of antibody against the DENVs rises with age. Children are more likely than adults to experience disease, and most adults in the local population are immune to infection. Among travelers, the risk for acquisition is higher than in areas that experience epidemic transmission, but the seasonal variation in risk is somewhat predictable. Hyperendemicity is a major factor contributing to the occurrence of DHF.

FACTORS INFLUENCING TRANSMISSION — The worldwide incidence of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) has been increasing in the past several decades, and the geographic distribution of these diseases has expanded. The emergence of DHF as a public health problem has largely been a result of human behaviors including population growth; poor urban planning with overcrowding and poor sanitation; modern transportation, which allows increased movement and colocation of humans; mosquitoes; viruses; and lack of effective and sustained mosquito control [8].

The potential effects of global climate change are a major source of concern for the future. Increased DENV transmission has been associated with El Niño/Southern Oscillation events [61,62]. Mathematical models predict that increased global temperatures will further expand the range of Ae. aegypti and the DENVs [63,64].

The transmission cycle for DENVs is dependent upon the interaction between infective mosquitoes and susceptible humans and between susceptible mosquitoes and viremic humans. Changes in social practices and human movement behavior have the potential to alter patterns of DENV transmission. Statistical modeling estimated that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of dengue in many countries during 2020 due to such measures implemented in response to the COVID pandemic [65]. Dengue virus transmission is boosted by the following factors [6]:

Increased vector density – One study of naturally infected humans estimated that viremia levels of approximately 6 to 8 log10 RNA copies/mL led to infection of half of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes that took a blood meal under laboratory conditions [66]. In many tropical countries, seasonal increases in rainfall contribute to an increased density of mosquitoes. One factor that can be modified is the presence of open water storage containers in or near the home.

Shorter mosquito incubation – The length of the incubation time in the mosquito (known as the extrinsic incubation period) is inversely associated with the ambient temperature. Warmer temperatures increase the length of time that a mosquito remains infective.

Increased movement of mosquito vectors and DENVs – Air, land, and water transportation of mosquitoes or viremic humans facilitate the dissemination of DENVs.

Increased density of susceptible hosts – Crowded conditions probably increase the potential for virus transmission. However, as the prevalence of prior infection increases, the fraction of the population that remains susceptible is reduced.

Increased duration and magnitude of viremia in humans – Attenuated virus strains produced in the laboratory have been shown to produce low titers of virus in the blood, which are not efficiently transmitted to mosquitoes [67,68]. It is unclear whether natural strains of DENV differ in the viremia titers they produce [69].

OTHER ROUTES OF TRANSMISSION — Given the high titers of infectious DENVs found in blood and tissues during acute infection, the potential exists for virus transmission by routes other than mosquito vectors.

Nosocomial transmission — Dengue virus may be transmitted via blood products, needlestick injury, and mucocutaneous exposure [70-72]. Blood donors may be asymptomatic even in the setting of viremia [71]. One report estimated a DENV transmissibility rate of 37 percent via blood products [72].

Vertical transmission — Vertical DENV transmission has been reported in a few small case series [73]; based on these cases and the known pattern of viremia, this possibility should be considered in cases where illness in the mother occurs within the 10 days before delivery (including onset on the day of delivery). Illness presents in these newborns up to 11 days (median 4 days) after birth.

Pregnancy does not appear to increase the incidence or severity of dengue [74]. In a prospective study conducted in Kuala Lumpur of 2958 parturients, 2531 paired maternal-umbilical cord blood samples were tested for dengue-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)M to determine the prevalence of infection and the vertical transmission rate [75]. Sixty-three women (2.5 percent) had a positive IgM serology. Only one (1.6 percent, 95% CI 0-9.5 percent) of the paired umbilical cord samples was seropositive for dengue. None of the maternal and fetal blood samples had evidence of viral RNA by polymerase chain reaction.

Breastfeeding has been proposed as a route of vertical DENV transmission [76].

Sexual transmission of the DENVs appears to be an infrequent event, if it occurs at all [77].

SUMMARY

Virology – Dengue viruses (DENVs) are members of the family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus. The DENV complex comprises four antigenically related but distinct viruses, which are mosquito-borne human pathogens. (See 'Classification' above.)

Transmission cycle – Susceptible humans can become infected after an infected female Aedes mosquito takes a blood meal. Viremia in humans begins toward the end of a four- to six-day incubation period and persists until fever abates. An uninfected Aedes mosquito may acquire the virus after feeding on an infected individual during this viremic period. Once infected, mosquitoes carry the virus for their lifespan and remain infective for humans. (See 'Transmission cycle' above.)

Mosquito vectorsAedes aegypti mosquitoes are daytime feeders that prefer to bite humans and are frequently unnoticed. They are easily interrupted in their feeding and move on to another host, frequently taking multiple blood meals in a single breeding cycle. Thus, an infected Ae. Aegypti mosquito may transmit a DENV to several individuals within a small geographic area. (See 'Mosquito vectors' above.)

Dengue epidemics – Epidemic DENV transmission occurs when the introduction of a DENV into a region is an isolated event involving a single DENV type. If sufficiently large populations of susceptible hosts and mosquitoes are present, transmission of dengue is explosive, leading to a recognizable epidemic. Herd immunity, changes in weather, and mosquito control efforts can all contribute to the termination of the epidemic. (See 'Sporadic/Epidemic dengue' above.)

Endemicity – "Hyperendemic" transmission refers to the continuous circulation of multiple DENV types in the same area. This requires the year-round presence of competent vector mosquitoes and an ongoing presence of susceptible individuals. (See 'Hyperendemic dengue' above.)

Environmental factors – Dengue virus transmission is enhanced by multiple factors, including higher vector density, greater movement of mosquito vectors, and increased density of susceptible humans. The effect of climate change on dengue prevalence is currently unknown. (See 'Factors influencing transmission' above.)

Geographic distributionAe. aegypti and DENVs are endemic in every continent except Europe and Antarctica, although epidemic dengue hemorrhagic fever occurs predominantly in Asia and the Americas. (See 'Distribution of dengue viruses and their vectors' above.)

  1. Rush AB. An account of the bilious remitting fever, as it appeared in Philadelphia in the summer and autumn of the year 1780. In: Medical Inquiries and Observations, Richard & Hall, Philadelphia p.104.
  2. Ashburn PM, Craig CF, US Army Board for the Study of Tropical Diseases. Experimental investigations regarding the etiology of dengue fever. 1907. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1747.
  3. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 2013; 496:504.
  4. Henchal EA, Putnak JR. The dengue viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev 1990; 3:376.
  5. Wilder-Smith A, Schwartz E. Dengue in travelers. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:924.
  6. Kuno G. Review of the factors modulating dengue transmission. Epidemiol Rev 1995; 17:321.
  7. Wang E, Ni H, Xu R, et al. Evolutionary relationships of endemic/epidemic and sylvatic dengue viruses. J Virol 2000; 74:3227.
  8. Gubler DJ. Epidemic dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: a global public health problem in the 21st century. In: Emerging Infections I, Scheld WM, Armstrong D, Hughes JM (Eds), ASM Press, Washington, DC 1998. p.1.
  9. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, et al. Dengue in the early febrile phase: viremia and antibody responses. J Infect Dis 1997; 176:322.
  10. Halstead SB. Selective primary health care: strategies for control of disease in the developing world. XI. Dengue. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6:251.
  11. Harrington LC, Scott TW, Lerdthusnee K, et al. Dispersal of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti within and between rural communities. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005; 72:209.
  12. Scott TW, Amerasinghe PH, Morrison AC, et al. Longitudinal studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Puerto Rico: blood feeding frequency. J Med Entomol 2000; 37:89.
  13. Gratz NG. Critical review of the vector status of Aedes albopictus. Med Vet Entomol 2004; 18:215.
  14. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Update: Aedes albopictus infestation--United States, Mexico. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1989; 38:440, 445.
  15. Caron M, Paupy C, Grard G, et al. Recent introduction and rapid dissemination of Chikungunya virus and Dengue virus serotype 2 associated with human and mosquito coinfections in Gabon, central Africa. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:e45.
  16. Savage HM, Fritz CL, Rutstein D, et al. Epidemic of dengue-4 virus in Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia, and implication of Aedes hensilli as an epidemic vector. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 58:519.
  17. Pinheiro FP, Corber SJ. Global situation of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever, and its emergence in the Americas. World Health Stat Q 1997; 50:161.
  18. Leta S, Beyene TJ, De Clercq EM, et al. Global risk mapping for major diseases transmitted by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Int J Infect Dis 2018; 67:25.
  19. Kraemer MU, Sinka ME, Duda KA, et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Elife 2015; 4:e08347.
  20. Laporta GZ, Potter AM, Oliveira JFA, et al. Global Distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in a Climate Change Scenario of Regional Rivalry. Insects 2023; 14.
  21. PanAmerican Health Organization. Dengue. https://www.paho.org/en/topics/dengue (Accessed on June 07, 2023).
  22. WHO Report on Global Surveillance of Epidemic-Prone Infectious Diseases. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66485 (Accessed on June 07, 2023).
  23. Undurraga EA, Halasa YA, Shepard DS. Use of expansion factors to estimate the burden of dengue in Southeast Asia: a systematic analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7:e2056.
  24. Messina JP, Brady OJ, Pigott DM, et al. A global compendium of human dengue virus occurrence. Sci Data 2014; 1:140004.
  25. Virtual Meeting of Regional Technical Advisory Group for dengue and other arbovirus diseases, New Delhi, India, 4-6 October 2021. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/sea-cd-331 (Accessed on June 07, 2023).
  26. Qiu FX, Gubler DJ, Liu JC, Chen QQ. Dengue in China: a clinical review. Bull World Health Organ 1993; 71:349.
  27. Wartel TA, Prayitno A, Hadinegoro SR, et al. Three Decades of Dengue Surveillance in Five Highly Endemic South East Asian Countries. Asia Pac J Public Health 2017; 29:7.
  28. Kutsuna S, Kato Y, Moi ML, et al. Autochthonous dengue fever, Tokyo, Japan, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis 2015; 21:517.
  29. Kobayashi D, Murota K, Fujita R, et al. Dengue Virus Infection in Aedes albopictus during the 2014 Autochthonous Dengue Outbreak in Tokyo Metropolis, Japan. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018; 98:1460.
  30. Nealon J, Taurel AF, Capeding MR, et al. Symptomatic Dengue Disease in Five Southeast Asian Countries: Epidemiological Evidence from a Dengue Vaccine Trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0004918.
  31. World Health Organization. Dengue Bulletin, Vol-41. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/ISSN-0250-8362 (Accessed on June 07, 2023).
  32. Cotter CJ, Tufa AJ, Johnson S, et al. Outbreak of Dengue Virus Type 2 - American Samoa, November 2016-October 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67:1319.
  33. Ryff KR, Rivera A, Rodriguez DM, et al. Epidemiologic Trends of Dengue in U.S. Territories, 2010-2020. MMWR Surveill Summ 2023; 72:1.
  34. Dengue in the WHO Western Pacific Region. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1998; 73:273.
  35. Mackenzie JS, Broom AK, Hall RA, et al. Arboviruses in the Australian region, 1990 to 1998. Commun Dis Intell 1998; 22:93.
  36. Knope KE, Muller M, Kurucz N, et al. Arboviral diseases and malaria in Australia, 2013-14: Annual report of the National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep 2016; 40:E400.
  37. Amarasinghe A, Kuritsk JN, Letson GW, Margolis HS. Dengue virus infection in Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17:1349.
  38. Surveillance and control of arboviral diseases in the WHO African region: assessment of country capacities. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240052918 (Accessed on June 07, 2023).
  39. Eisenhut M, Schwarz TF, Hegenscheid B. Seroprevalence of dengue, chikungunya and Sindbis virus infections in German aid workers. Infection 1999; 27:82.
  40. Sharp TW, Wallace MR, Hayes CG, et al. Dengue fever in U.S. troops during Operation Restore Hope, Somalia, 1992-1993. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1995; 53:89.
  41. Humphrey JM, Cleton NB, Reusken CB, et al. Dengue in the Middle East and North Africa: A Systematic Review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016; 10:e0005194.
  42. Schaffner F, Medlock JM, Van Bortel W. Public health significance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19:685.
  43. Tomasello D, Schlagenhauf P. Chikungunya and dengue autochthonous cases in Europe, 2007-2012. Travel Med Infect Dis 2013; 11:274.
  44. Monge S, García-Ortúzar V, López Hernández B, et al. Characterization of the first autochthonous dengue outbreak in Spain (August-September 2018). Acta Trop 2020; 205:105402.
  45. Lazzarini L, Barzon L, Foglia F, et al. First autochthonous dengue outbreak in Italy, August 2020. Euro Surveill 2020; 25.
  46. Sharp TM, Morris S, Morrison A, et al. Fatal Dengue Acquired in Florida. N Engl J Med 2021; 384:2257.
  47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Historic Data (2010-2022). https://www.cdc.gov/dengue/statistics-maps/historic-data.html (Accessed on August 29, 2023).
  48. Rivera A, Adams LE, Sharp TM, et al. Travel-Associated and Locally Acquired Dengue Cases - United States, 2010-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69:149.
  49. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Locally acquired Dengue--Key West, Florida, 2009-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010; 59:577.
  50. Effler PV, Pang L, Kitsutani P, et al. Dengue fever, Hawaii, 2001-2002. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:742.
  51. Johnston D, Viray M, Ushiroda J, et al. Notes from the Field: Outbreak of Locally Acquired Cases of Dengue Fever--Hawaii, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65:34.
  52. Siqueira JB Jr, Martelli CM, Coelho GE, et al. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever, Brazil, 1981-2002. Emerg Infect Dis 2005; 11:48.
  53. McBride WJ, Mullner H, LaBrooy JT, Wronski I. The 1993 dengue 2 epidemic in North Queensland: a serosurvey and comparison of hemagglutination inhibition with an ELISA. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1998; 59:457.
  54. Gubler DJ. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: its history and resurgence as a global public health problem. In: Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever, Gubler DJ, Kuno G (Eds), CAB International, Wallingford 1997. p.1.
  55. Kouri GP, Guzmán MG, Bravo JR, Triana C. Dengue haemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: lessons from the Cuban epidemic, 1981. Bull World Health Organ 1989; 67:375.
  56. Endy TP, Nisalak A, Chunsuttiwat S, et al. Spatial and temporal circulation of dengue virus serotypes: a prospective study of primary school children in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:52.
  57. Cummings DA, Irizarry RA, Huang NE, et al. Travelling waves in the occurrence of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand. Nature 2004; 427:344.
  58. Burke DS, Nisalak A, Johnson DE, Scott RM. A prospective study of dengue infections in Bangkok. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1988; 38:172.
  59. Porter KR, Beckett CG, Kosasih H, et al. Epidemiology of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever in a cohort of adults living in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005; 72:60.
  60. Endy TP, Chunsuttiwat S, Nisalak A, et al. Epidemiology of inapparent and symptomatic acute dengue virus infection: a prospective study of primary school children in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:40.
  61. Hales S, Weinstein P, Woodward A. Dengue fever epidemics in the South Pacific: driven by El Niño Southern Oscillation? Lancet 1996; 348:1664.
  62. Dengue. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1998; 73:185.
  63. Jetten TH, Focks DA. Potential changes in the distribution of dengue transmission under climate warming. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1997; 57:285.
  64. Hales S, de Wet N, Maindonald J, Woodward A. Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. Lancet 2002; 360:830.
  65. Chen Y, Li N, Lourenço J, et al. Measuring the effects of COVID-19-related disruption on dengue transmission in southeast Asia and Latin America: a statistical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22:657.
  66. Nguyet MN, Duong TH, Trung VT, et al. Host and viral features of human dengue cases shape the population of infected and infectious Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:9072.
  67. Bhamarapravati N, Yoksan S, Chayaniyayothin T, et al. Immunization with a live attenuated dengue-2-virus candidate vaccine (16681-PDK 53): clinical, immunological and biological responses in adult volunteers. Bull World Health Organ 1987; 65:189.
  68. Schoepp RJ, Beaty BJ, Eckels KH. Infection of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes with dengue parent and progeny candidate vaccine viruses: a possible marker of human attenuation. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1991; 45:202.
  69. Gubler DJ, Suharyono W, Lubis I, et al. Epidemic dengue 3 in central Java, associated with low viremia in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1981; 30:1094.
  70. Chen LH, Wilson ME. Transmission of dengue virus without a mosquito vector: nosocomial mucocutaneous transmission and other routes of transmission. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:e56.
  71. Stramer SL, Linnen JM, Carrick JM, et al. Dengue viremia in blood donors identified by RNA and detection of dengue transfusion transmission during the 2007 dengue outbreak in Puerto Rico. Transfusion 2012; 52:1657.
  72. Sabino EC, Loureiro P, Lopes ME, et al. Transfusion-Transmitted Dengue and Associated Clinical Symptoms During the 2012 Epidemic in Brazil. J Infect Dis 2016; 213:694.
  73. Sirinavin S, Nuntnarumit P, Supapannachart S, et al. Vertical dengue infection: case reports and review. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23:1042.
  74. Carroll ID, Toovey S, Van Gompel A. Dengue fever and pregnancy - a review and comment. Travel Med Infect Dis 2007; 5:183.
  75. Tan PC, Rajasingam G, Devi S, Omar SZ. Dengue infection in pregnancy: prevalence, vertical transmission, and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:1111.
  76. Barthel A, Gourinat AC, Cazorla C, et al. Breast milk as a possible route of vertical transmission of dengue virus? Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57:415.
  77. Blitvich BJ, Magalhaes T, Laredo-Tiscareño SV, Foy BD. Sexual Transmission of Arboviruses: A Systematic Review. Viruses 2020; 12.
Topic 3028 Version 35.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟