ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Hepatic hemangioma

Hepatic hemangioma
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Oct 10, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Hepatic hemangiomas (also referred to as cavernous hemangiomas because of the cavernous vascular space seen histologically) are the most common benign liver lesion. Hepatic hemangiomas are often solitary but multiple lesions may be present. Most patients with hepatic hemangiomas are asymptomatic and have an excellent prognosis, while symptoms are more likely to occur in patients with large lesions.

The etiology of hepatic hemangiomas is incompletely understood. They are thought to be vascular malformations or hamartomas of congenital origin that enlarge by ectasia rather than by hyperplasia or hypertrophy.

This topic will focus on the clinical features, diagnosis, and management of patients with hepatic hemangiomas. The approach to patients with other benign, solid liver lesions is discussed separately. (See "Hepatocellular adenoma" and "Focal nodular hyperplasia".)

The clinical features, diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma are discussed separately:

(See "Clinical features and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma".)

(See "Overview of treatment approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma".)

(See "Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in adults".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND RISK FACTORS

Prevalence — Hepatic hemangiomas are the most common benign liver lesion, with an estimated prevalence of 0.4 to 20 percent in the general population [1-3]. While the highest estimates have been derived from autopsy studies [1,4], there is increasing recognition of hemangiomas in asymptomatic individuals undergoing abdominal imaging for other reasons [5].

Age and sex — Hepatic hemangioma can be diagnosed at any age; however, the majority of lesions (60 to 80 percent) are diagnosed in patients who are between the ages of 30 and 50 years. In adults, hemangiomas occur more frequently in women with a ratio of approximately 3:1 [4,6].

Exposure to estrogens — Hepatic hemangiomas may increase in size during pregnancy or with estrogen therapy; but the exact mechanism of hormonal influence is unclear [7-9]. In a prospective cohort study including 94 women with 181 hemangiomas, patients on estrogen therapy had higher rates of lesion enlargement over time compared with unexposed patients (23 versus 10 percent) [10]. However, estrogen receptors are not present in all hemangiomas, and tumor growth has been demonstrated in the absence of estrogen therapy and in postmenopausal women [11,12].

PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Macroscopic features: Hemangiomas are often solitary, but multiple lesions may be present in up to 40 percent of patients [13]. The majority are small (<5 cm), while size ranges from a few millimeters to over 20 cm. Hemangiomas ≥10 cm are referred to as giant hemangiomas. While hemangiomas can be found in both lobes of the liver, they are more frequently located in the right lobe [3].

On gross examination, hemangiomas appear as well-circumscribed, flat lesions with a dark red-blue color and are often surrounded by a thin capsule [3,14]. The cut surfaces exhibit a red-brown appearance with a spongy consistency that may show hemorrhage, scarring, or calcification (picture 1).

Microscopic features: Microscopically, the lesion is composed of cavernous vascular spaces of varying sizes, lined by a single layer of flat endothelium and filled with blood [15]. The vascular compartments are separated by thin fibrous septae and may contain thrombi (picture 2). Giant hemangiomas may develop a collagenous scar or fibrous nodule as thrombosis occurs.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Patient presentation — Hemangiomas are typically discovered incidentally on abdominal imaging or during the work up of abnormal liver biochemical tests. Most patients do not report symptoms.

When symptoms are present, right upper quadrant pain or fullness is common. Less common symptoms include nausea, anorexia, and early satiety, which may develop with large hemangiomas due to compression of adjacent organs [16]. Rarely, acute abdominal pain can result from lesion thrombosis or bleeding that results in stretching and inflammation of the liver capsule [13]. Abdominal pain from an acute thrombosis may be associated with fever and abnormal liver biochemical tests [17]. Other rare presentations include the development of hemobilia following hemangioma rupture into the biliary tree [18].

Symptoms are generally associated with larger hemangiomas (ie, >10 cm) [3].

Physical examination is usually normal, but may reveal a palpable liver or mass. A bruit is rarely heard over the hemangioma.

Laboratory findings — Liver biochemical and function test abnormalities are uncommon but may occur in patients with a complication such as thrombosis, bleeding, or compression of the biliary tree.

Imaging — The imaging appearance of hepatic hemangioma depends on the specific imaging modality (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], computed tomography [CT] scan), use of contrast enhancement, and multiphasic techniques.

Ultrasound

Noncontrast ultrasound – Noncontrast ultrasound typically reveals a well-demarcated, homogeneous, hyperechoic mass (image 1). In patients with fatty infiltration of the liver, a hemangioma may appear as a hypoechoic mass due to the bright signal from the surrounding parenchyma. Blood flow within the hemangioma can be demonstrated by color Doppler in 10 to 50 percent of hemangiomas [19-22].

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound – Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) uses contrast agents to improve visualization by enhancing the ultrasound signal produced by flowing blood. In hemangiomas, the most common findings on CEUS are peripheral nodular enhancement in the arterial phase, followed by partial or complete centripetal fill-in (image 2) [23]. Enhancement is sustained through the late phase of imaging. CEUS features of liver lesions including hepatic hemangiomas are discussed in more detail separately. (See "Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of liver lesions".)

Cross-sectional imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging – The typical hemangioma appearance on MRI is a smooth, well-demarcated, homogeneous mass that has low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and is hyperintense on T2-weighted images (image 3) [24,25]. If intralesional fibrosis is present, it results in areas of low intensity on T2-weighted images.

The use of a contrast agent and multiphase technique results in arterial phase enhancement of the lesion's peripheral zone that has variable thickness and may have a corrugated inner margin, while the lesion's center remains hypodense [26,27]. (See "Patient evaluation before gadolinium contrast administration for magnetic resonance imaging".)

CT – On contrast enhanced CT, hemangiomas demonstrate peripheral nodular enhancement in the early phase, followed by a centripetal pattern or "filling in" during the late phase [28,29]. The lesions classically opacify after a delay of three or more minutes and remain isodense or hyperdense on delayed scans (image 4). Possible exceptions are larger hemangiomas, in which the center of the lesion may not opacify completely. Variations in vascular enhancement among hemangiomas may be due to differences in the size of the vascular spaces, the presence of cystic spaces, and the amount of scar tissue within hemangiomas. Absence of enhancement is seen in hemangiomas with large cystic areas or scar tissue [30]. (See 'Pathologic features' above.)

A noncontrast-enhanced CT scan of a hemangioma usually demonstrates a well-demarcated hypodense mass (image 4). The lesions may appear as hyperdense relative to the surrounding parenchyma in patients with fatty infiltration of the surrounding liver.

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH — The diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma may be suspected in a patient without cirrhosis who is found to have a solid liver lesion on imaging. The general approach to incidental liver lesions identified by imaging is discussed separately. (See "Approach to the adult patient with an incidental solid liver lesion".)

Hepatic hemangioma is largely a radiographic diagnosis that can be made with noncontrast ultrasound if the following criteria are met [3,31]:

Typical features are present (ie, homogenous, hyperechoic, well-delineated margin).

Lesion size is <3 cm.

Patient has no history of cirrhosis or extrahepatic malignancy [31,32].

If these criteria are not met, the diagnosis is based on contrast-enhanced imaging (eg, MRI, CT scan). We perform contrast-enhanced MRI because it is highly accurate with a sensitivity of approximately 90 percent and a specificity of over 90 percent [24,33,34]. MRI using gadolinium-based contrast and multiphasic enhancement can help differentiate hepatic hemangiomas from other solid liver lesions (eg, hepatocellular carcinoma), and the use of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents for evaluating liver lesions is discussed separately [35]. (See "Patient evaluation before gadolinium contrast administration for magnetic resonance imaging" and 'Differential diagnosis' below.)

Patients with a history of cirrhosis or extrahepatic malignancy are at risk for liver malignancy (eg, hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatic metastases, respectively), and such patients require contrast-enhanced imaging to confirm the diagnosis of a benign hemangioma [32]. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma", section on 'Diagnostic approach'.)

We do not perform fine-needle aspiration biopsy (ie, targeted liver biopsy) of a possible hemangioma for the following reasons:

The availability of imaging with high diagnostic accuracy [24,33,34].

Risk of rupture or bleeding resulting in hemodynamic instability, need for blood transfusion, or mortality [36-38].

Low diagnostic yield [39,40]. For example, in a study including 36 patients with suspected hepatic hemangioma who had fine-needle aspiration biopsy, sufficient tissue for making a diagnosis was obtained from 21 patients (58 percent) [38].

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS — Solid liver lesions such as hemangiomas are largely a radiologic diagnosis. However, if the imaging characteristics on contrast-enhanced, cross-sectional imaging are not typical, additional evaluation may be required. The differential diagnosis includes:

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) – HCC is a possible cause of a solid liver lesion, particularly for patients with cirrhosis. However, some liver lesions in such patients have imaging features that are not typical for HCC. Serial imaging to document lesion stability or to demonstrate evolving features of HCC is often required in this setting. Imaging criteria for the diagnosis of HCC (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) are discussed separately. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma".)

Metastatic disease – Metastases to the liver are a possible cause of a solid liver lesion in patients with a history of extrahepatic malignancy. In such patients, the evaluation should start with imaging to search for metastatic disease in other organs, and this is discussed separately. (See "Approach to the adult patient with an incidental solid liver lesion", section on 'Patients with extrahepatic malignancy'.)

MANAGEMENT

Asymptomatic patients — Asymptomatic patients with hepatic hemangioma do not require treatment, and they are observed for the development of symptoms. The approach to surveillance imaging is based on hemangioma size:

≤5 cm: No further imaging

>5 cm: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 6 to 12 months:

If the lesion size remains stable on surveillance imaging (ie, growth rate ≤3 mm per year), no further imaging is performed.

If the lesion appears to be growing at a rate >3 mm per year, we repeat surveillance with contrast-enhanced MRI in 6 to 12 months. If the lesion appears stable, no further imaging is performed.

If the lesion continues to grow at a rate of >3 mm per year, the patient is evaluated by a multidisciplinary team (eg, hepatologist, hepatobiliary surgeon) for consideration of surgical intervention. While a specific growth rate and/or maximum lesion size is not a prerequisite for surgical intervention, the decision to intervene is usually based on symptom severity and lesion size. (See 'Symptomatic patients' below.)

Long-term follow-up of hemangiomas demonstrates that most lesions exhibit either slow or no growth and rarely develop complications. (See 'Outcome' below.)

Symptomatic patients — Intervention is rarely needed for patients with hepatic hemangioma. However, patients who have persistent symptoms attributed to the hemangioma (eg, early satiety, abdominal pain) are evaluated by a multidisciplinary team (hepatologist, hepatobiliary surgeon) for consideration of surgical intervention. The decision to intervene is individualized and is typically based on severity of symptoms and lesion size.

However, for patients who have abdominal pain in the absence of additional symptoms (eg, early satiety, nausea), other causes of pain should be excluded prior to intervention. The evaluation of the patient with abdominal pain is discussed separately. (See "Evaluation of the adult with abdominal pain".)

Surgical methods for treating hepatic hemangioma include liver resection or enucleation [41-48]. In addition, for some patients with giant hemangiomas (size >10 cm), preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization has been used to reduce lesion size prior to surgical intervention [49-51]. (See "Overview of hepatic resection" and "Surgical techniques for managing hepatic injury".)

Data suggest that enucleation was associated with better overall outcomes than anatomic liver resection (eg, lobectomy), while the specific approach also depends on surgeon preference and lesion location. In a meta-analysis of nine studies including 1185 patients with hepatic hemangioma, patients who underwent enucleation had a lower risk of postoperative complications (relative risk 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84) and less blood loss compared with patients treated with liver resection [47]. No surgery-related deaths were reported in either group.

Data from observational studies suggest that the majority of symptomatic patients with hemangioma benefit from surgical intervention [41,52-54]. In a multicenter observational study including 204 patients who underwent resection for abdominal symptoms, 129 patients (63 percent) reported symptomatic improvement postoperatively during a 90-day follow-up period [41]. In addition, hepatic resection was associated with low mortality rate (0.8 percent).

SPECIAL POPULATIONS

Pregnancy — We do not advise against pregnancy for asymptomatic female patients with known hepatic hemangioma who wish to conceive; in addition, we do not routinely perform surveillance liver ultrasound during pregnancy [29,55-57]. The risks associated with pregnancy have not been well-defined, although limited data suggest the following:

Conservative management consisting of observation is associated with good maternal and fetal outcomes. In a case series of four women with hemangiomas (size range: <2 cm to 8 cm) and a total of seven pregnancies, all patients were managed with observation only [57]. No hemangioma growth or complications occurred during gestation or delivery. One year after delivery, one patient had lesion growth to 10 cm that was associated with pain, and she underwent surgical enucleation.

Estrogen may influence lesion growth, but the risk of lesion rupture is similar for pregnant and nonpregnant women [58]. (See 'Exposure to estrogens' above.)

Children — Hepatic hemangiomas in children most commonly occur in the setting of multiple skin hemangiomas and rarely may be associated with complications such as heart failure. The clinical features and management of infantile hemangiomas are discussed separately. (See "Infantile hemangiomas: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and complications" and "Infantile hemangiomas: Management".)

The management of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, a rare vascular tumor occurring during infancy or early childhood, is discussed separately. (See "Tufted angioma, kaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE), and Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon (KMP)".)

Diffuse hemangiomatosis — Hepatic hemangiomatosis (ie, the presence of hemangiomas throughout the liver), is rare in adult patients [11,59]. The etiology is unknown, although an association with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia has been suggested [60]. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome)", section on 'Hepatic involvement'.)

OUTCOME

Prognosis — The overall prognosis for most patients with hepatic hemangioma is favorable because most lesions remain asymptomatic and without complications [6,61]. In a study including 76 patients with asymptomatic hepatic hemangiomas, none of the patients developed symptoms or complications during a mean follow-up of 92 months [6].

Data suggest that some hepatic hemangiomas will grow over time; however, the clinical significance of the typical growth rate is uncertain [62,63]. In a study including 123 patients with a total of 163 hemangiomas (mean size 3 cm) that were examined with a minimum of two cross-sectional studies at least one year apart, 83 lesions (51 percent) increased in size by any amount, while 74 lesions (45 percent) shrunk and six lesions (4 percent) were unchanged. For lesions that grew, the mean linear growth rate was 3 mm per year [63]. Hemangioma growth resulting in symptoms is uncommon; however, when symptoms do occur, surgical intervention may be required [12,64,65]. (See 'Symptomatic patients' above.)

Complications — Bleeding from a ruptured hemangioma is exceedingly rare [6,66-69], and the risk of rupture does not appear to increase with increasing lesion size [68]. Hemangioma rupture is typically managed with transcatheter arterial embolization of the hepatic artery to control bleeding before proceeding with surgical resection [66,67].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Focal liver lesions".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Epidemiology – Hepatic hemangiomas are the most common benign liver lesion, with an estimated prevalence of 0.4 to 20 percent in the general population. In adults, hemangiomas occur more frequently in women, and they can be diagnosed at any age. (See 'Epidemiology and risk factors' above.)

Clinical features – Hemangiomas are typically discovered incidentally on abdominal imaging, and most patients do not report symptoms. When symptoms are present, right upper quadrant pain or fullness is common. (See 'Patient presentation' above.)

Diagnostic approach – Hepatic hemangioma is largely a radiographic diagnosis that can be made with noncontrast ultrasound if the following criteria are met (see 'Diagnostic approach' above):

Typical features are present (ie, homogenous, hyperechoic, well-delineated margin)

Lesion size is <3 cm

Patient has no history of cirrhosis or extrahepatic malignancy

For patients who not meet these criteria, the diagnosis is based on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging (eg, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography scan).

Management – For asymptomatic patients with hepatic hemangioma, no treatment is required. The approach to monitoring is based on lesion size (see 'Asymptomatic patients' above):

Lesions ≤5 cm: No further imaging

Lesions >5 cm: Surveillance imaging (contrast-enhanced MRI) in 6 to 12 months:

-If lesion size remains stable (ie, growth rate ≤3 mm per year), no further imaging

-If the lesion appears to be growing at a rate >3 mm per year, surveillance imaging with contrast-enhanced MRI is repeated in 6 to 12 months. If the lesion appears stable, no further imaging is performed.

If the lesion continues to grow at a rate of >3 mm per year, the patient is evaluated by a multidisciplinary team (eg, hepatologist, hepatobiliary surgeon) for consideration of surgical intervention.

For patients with persistent symptoms attributed to hepatic hemangioma, the patient is evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. The decision to intervene is typically based on symptom severity and lesion size. Surgical approaches include enucleation or liver resection (eg, lobectomy). For giant hemangiomas (>10 cm) and/or those with bleeding, transcatheter arterial embolization to reduce lesion size may be performed prior to elective surgery. (See 'Symptomatic patients' above.)

Prognosis – For most patients with hepatic hemangioma, the prognosis is favorable. Some hemangiomas will grow over time; however the clinical significance of the typically slow growth rate is uncertain. (See 'Outcome' above.)

  1. Bahirwani R, Reddy KR. Review article: the evaluation of solitary liver masses. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28:953.
  2. Rungsinaporn K, Phaisakamas T. Frequency of abnormalities detected by upper abdominal ultrasound. J Med Assoc Thai 2008; 91:1072.
  3. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of benign liver tumours. J Hepatol 2016; 65:386.
  4. Gandolfi L, Leo P, Solmi L, et al. Natural history of hepatic haemangiomas: clinical and ultrasound study. Gut 1991; 32:677.
  5. Horta G, López M, Dotte A, et al. [Benign focal liver lesions detected by computed tomography: Review of 1,184 examinations]. Rev Med Chil 2015; 143:197.
  6. Farges O, Daradkeh S, Bismuth H. Cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: are there any indications for resection? World J Surg 1995; 19:19.
  7. Saegusa T, Ito K, Oba N, et al. Enlargement of multiple cavernous hemangioma of the liver in association with pregnancy. Intern Med 1995; 34:207.
  8. Graham E, Cohen AW, Soulen M, Faye R. Symptomatic liver hemangioma with intra-tumor hemorrhage treated by angiography and embolization during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81:813.
  9. Conter RL, Longmire WP Jr. Recurrent hepatic hemangiomas. Possible association with estrogen therapy. Ann Surg 1988; 207:115.
  10. Glinkova V, Shevah O, Boaz M, et al. Hepatic haemangiomas: possible association with female sex hormones. Gut 2004; 53:1352.
  11. Lehmann FS, Beglinger C, Schnabel K, Terracciano L. Progressive development of diffuse liver hemangiomatosis. J Hepatol 1999; 30:951.
  12. DuPre CT, Fincher RM. Case report: cavernous hemangioma of the liver. Am J Med Sci 1992; 303:241.
  13. Tait N, Richardson AJ, Muguti G, Little JM. Hepatic cavernous haemangioma: a 10 year review. Aust N Z J Surg 1992; 62:521.
  14. Baer HU, Dennison AR, Mouton W, et al. Enucleation of giant hemangiomas of the liver. Technical and pathologic aspects of a neglected procedure. Ann Surg 1992; 216:673.
  15. Kim GE, Thung SN, Tsui WM, Ferrell LD. Hepatic cavernous hemangioma: underrecognized associated histologic features. Liver Int 2006; 26:334.
  16. Kuo PC, Lewis WD, Jenkins RL. Treatment of giant hemangiomas of the liver by enucleation. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:49.
  17. Pateron D, Babany G, Belghiti J, et al. Giant hemangioma of the liver with pain, fever, and abnormal liver tests. Report of two cases. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36:524.
  18. Mikami T, Hirata K, Oikawa I, et al. Hemobilia caused by a giant benign hemangioma of the liver: report of a case. Surg Today 1998; 28:948.
  19. Perkins AB, Imam K, Smith WJ, Cronan JJ. Color and power Doppler sonography of liver hemangiomas: a dream unfulfilled? J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28:159.
  20. Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Fujita M, et al. Color Doppler flow imaging of liver tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:509.
  21. Yasuhara K, Kimura K, Ohto M, et al. Pulsed Doppler in the diagnosis of small liver tumours. Br J Radiol 1988; 61:898.
  22. Ohnishi K, Nomura F. Ultrasonic Doppler studies of hepatocellular carcinoma and comparison with other hepatic focal lesions. Gastroenterology 1989; 97:1489.
  23. Jang JY, Kim MY, Jeong SW, et al. Current consensus and guidelines of contrast enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions. Clin Mol Hepatol 2013; 19:1.
  24. McFarland EG, Mayo-Smith WW, Saini S, et al. Hepatic hemangiomas and malignant tumors: improved differentiation with heavily T2-weighted conventional spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 193:43.
  25. Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. Hepatic hemangioma: correlation of enhancement types with diffusion-weighted MR findings and apparent diffusion coefficients. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70:325.
  26. Semelka RC, Brown ED, Ascher SM, et al. Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. Radiology 1994; 192:401.
  27. Mastropasqua M, Kanematsu M, Leonardou P, et al. Cavernous hemangiomas in patients with chronic liver disease: MR imaging findings. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22:15.
  28. Blonski W, Reddy KR. Evaluation of nonmalignant liver masses. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2006; 8:38.
  29. Bioulac-Sage P, Laumonier H, Laurent C, et al. Benign and malignant vascular tumors of the liver in adults. Semin Liver Dis 2008; 28:302.
  30. Yamashita Y, Ogata I, Urata J, Takahashi M. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: pathologic correlation with dynamic CT findings. Radiology 1997; 203:121.
  31. Leifer DM, Middleton WD, Teefey SA, et al. Follow-up of patients at low risk for hepatic malignancy with a characteristic hemangioma at US. Radiology 2000; 214:167.
  32. Caturelli E, Pompili M, Bartolucci F, et al. Hemangioma-like lesions in chronic liver disease: diagnostic evaluation in patients. Radiology 2001; 220:337.
  33. Lee MG, Baker ME, Sostman HD, et al. The diagnostic accuracy/efficacy of MRI in differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from metastatic colorectal/breast carcinoma: a multiple reader ROC analysis using a jackknife technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20:905.
  34. Stark DD, Felder RC, Wittenberg J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cavernous hemangioma of the liver: tissue-specific characterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145:213.
  35. McInnes MD, Hibbert RM, Inácio JR, Schieda N. Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatocellular Adenoma: Accuracy of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MR Imaging-A Systematic Review. Radiology 2015; 277:927.
  36. Terriff BA, Gibney RG, Scudamore CH. Fatality from fine-needle aspiration biopsy of a hepatic hemangioma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:203.
  37. Davies R. Haemorrhage after fine-needle aspiration biopsy of an hepatic haemangioma. Med J Aust 1993; 158:364.
  38. Taavitsainen M, Airaksinen T, Kreula J, Päivänsalo M. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of liver hemangioma. Acta Radiol 1990; 31:69.
  39. Caturelli E, Rapaccini GL, Sabelli C, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma. Liver 1986; 6:326.
  40. Heilo A, Stenwig AE. Liver hemangioma: US-guided 18-gauge core-needle biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204:719.
  41. Miura JT, Amini A, Schmocker R, et al. Surgical management of hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional experience. HPB (Oxford) 2014; 16:924.
  42. Gedaly R, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA, et al. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver: anatomic resection vs. enucleation. Arch Surg 1999; 134:407.
  43. Ozden I, Emre A, Alper A, et al. Long-term results of surgery for liver hemangiomas. Arch Surg 2000; 135:978.
  44. Popescu I, Ciurea S, Brasoveanu V, et al. Liver hemangioma revisited: current surgical indications, technical aspects, results. Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48:770.
  45. Lerner SM, Hiatt JR, Salamandra J, et al. Giant cavernous liver hemangiomas: effect of operative approach on outcome. Arch Surg 2004; 139:818.
  46. Fu XH, Lai EC, Yao XP, et al. Enucleation of liver hemangiomas: is there a difference in surgical outcomes for centrally or peripherally located lesions? Am J Surg 2009; 198:184.
  47. Liu Y, Wei X, Wang K, et al. Enucleation versus Anatomic Resection for Giant Hepatic Hemangioma: A Meta-Analysis. Gastrointest Tumors 2017; 3:153.
  48. Giuliante F, Ardito F, Vellone M, et al. Reappraisal of surgical indications and approach for liver hemangioma: single-center experience on 74 patients. Am J Surg 2011; 201:741.
  49. Zhou JX, Huang JW, Wu H, Zeng Y. Successful liver resection in a giant hemangioma with intestinal obstruction after embolization. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:2974.
  50. Seo HI, Jo HJ, Sim MS, Kim S. Right trisegmentectomy with thoracoabdominal approach after transarterial embolization for giant hepatic hemangioma. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15:3437.
  51. Deutsch GS, Yeh KA, Bates WB 3rd, Tannehill WB. Embolization for management of hepatic hemangiomas. Am Surg 2001; 67:159.
  52. Aziz H, Brown ZJ, Baghdadi A, et al. A Comprehensive Review of Hepatic Hemangioma Management. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1998.
  53. Yoon SS, Charny CK, Fong Y, et al. Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of 115 patients with hepatic hemangioma. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 197:392.
  54. Terkivatan T, Vrijland WW, Den Hoed PT, et al. Size of lesion is not a criterion for resection during management of giant liver haemangioma. Br J Surg 2002; 89:1240.
  55. van Malenstein H, Maleux G, Monbaliu D, et al. Giant liver hemangioma: the role of female sex hormones and treatment. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23:438.
  56. Marques R, Taborda F, Jorge CS, et al. Successful outcome in a pregnancy complicated by large hepatic hemangioma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76:606.
  57. Cobey FC, Salem RR. A review of liver masses in pregnancy and a proposed algorithm for their diagnosis and management. Am J Surg 2004; 187:181.
  58. Schwartz SI, Husser WC. Cavernous hemangioma of the liver. A single institution report of 16 resections. Ann Surg 1987; 205:456.
  59. Moon WS, Yu HC, Lee JM, Kang MJ. Diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis in an adult. J Korean Med Sci 2000; 15:471.
  60. Haitjema T, Westermann CJ, Overtoom TT, et al. Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu disease): new insights in pathogenesis, complications, and treatment. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:714.
  61. Marrero JA, Ahn J, Rajender Reddy K, Americal College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guideline: the diagnosis and management of focal liver lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:1328.
  62. Gibney RG, Hendin AP, Cooperberg PL. Sonographically detected hepatic hemangiomas: absence of change over time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149:953.
  63. Hasan HY, Hinshaw JL, Borman EJ, et al. Assessing normal growth of hepatic hemangiomas during long-term follow-up. JAMA Surg 2014; 149:1266.
  64. Nghiem HV, Bogost GA, Ryan JA, et al. Cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: enlargement over time. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:137.
  65. Yoshida J, Yamasaki S, Yamamoto J, et al. Growing cavernous haemangioma of the liver: 11-fold increase in volume in a decade. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991; 6:414.
  66. Lupinacci RM, Szejnfeld D, Farah JF. Spontaneous rupture of a giant hepatic hemangioma. Sequential treatment with preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization and conservative hepatectomy. G Chir 2011; 32:469.
  67. Jain V, Ramachandran V, Garg R, et al. Spontaneous rupture of a giant hepatic hemangioma - sequential management with transcatheter arterial embolization and resection. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2010; 16:116.
  68. Pietrabissa A, Giulianotti P, Campatelli A, et al. Management and follow-up of 78 giant haemangiomas of the liver. Br J Surg 1996; 83:915.
  69. Hao F, Yang X, Tian Y, et al. Spontaneous internal hemorrhage of a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e8702.
Topic 3594 Version 26.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟