ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 2 مورد

Prevention of arthropod bites: Repellents and other measures

Prevention of arthropod bites: Repellents and other measures
Author:
Nancy L Breisch, PhD
Section Editor:
David BK Golden, MD
Deputy Editor:
Elinor L Baron, MD, DTMH
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: May 09, 2025.

INTRODUCTION — 

Tools for prevention of arthropod bites, including efficacy and safety of available repellents and permethrin-treated clothing, will be reviewed here.

Other tools for preventing mosquito bites include use of insecticide-treated nets, as well as housing and environmental modifications; these are discussed separately. (See "Malaria: Epidemiology, prevention, and elimination", section on 'Vector control'.)

Issues related to chemoprophylaxis for malaria prevention are discussed separately. (See "Prevention of malaria infection in travelers".)

PREVENTION GOALS — 

Goals for prevention of arthropod bites include [1]:

Reducing the risk of arthropod-borne infections (such as malaria, dengue fever, Zika virus infection, yellow fever, and others).  

Avoiding the nuisance of biting arthropods, including itching and local bite reactions.

OUR APPROACH

Preventing mosquito bites

Use of repellent and permethrin-treated clothing – The approach to repellent use depends on the risk of disease associated with mosquito exposure and perceived intolerance to being bitten [2,3]:

In regions with high risk of mosquito-borne disease transmission (such as in malaria-endemic areas), our approach to mosquito bite prevention consists of applying topical DEET (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide; 10 to 35 percent) to exposed skin, combined with use of permethrin-treated clothing.

Microencapsulated DEET formulations (such as Ultrathon [brand name], a 34 percent DEET lotion) provide longer duration of protection with lower repellent concentrations.

Use of topical picaridin (up to 30 percent) is a reasonable alternative to topical DEET for individuals who wish to avoid the unpleasant characteristics of DEET and are willing to accept a potentially less effective or shorter-acting repellent.

In areas with low risk of mosquito-borne disease transmission, for patients who wish to avoid nuisance bites, reasonable approaches include applying topical repellent (DEET or picaridin), with optional use of permethrin-treated clothing.

Behavioral interventions – Interventions to reduce the risk of mosquito bites include:

Modifying activities to avoid mosquito bites; measures might include staying indoors at dawn and dusk and avoidance of wetland areas.

Eliminating standing water in the immediate environment to reduce mosquito breeding areas.

Maintaining screens on windows and doors.

Preventing tick bites — Tools for tick bite prevention include [4,5]:  

Use of repellent and permethrin treated clothing – For prevention of tick bites, we suggest application of topical repellent (DEET or picaridin) to exposed skin, combined with use of permethrin-treated clothing. Use of permethrin-treated clothing is important because ticks commonly gain access to areas of skin where topical repellents are not applied.

Microencapsulated DEET formulations (such as Ultrathon [brand name], a 34 percent DEET lotion) provide longer duration of protection with lower repellent concentrations.

Behavioral interventions Interventions to reduce the risk of tick bites include:

Dressing to minimize tick access to the skin (tucking pant legs into socks and shirt into pants).

Inspecting the skin after time spent outdoors, paying special attention to armpits, knees, navel, beneath underwear, and around the hairline of the neck and ears.

Ticks attached to the skin should be removed promptly. (See "Evaluation of a tick bite for possible Lyme disease", section on 'Technique for tick removal'.)

Issues related to tick bite prevention are discussed further separately. (See "Prevention of Lyme disease".)

Application technique — Insect repellents should be applied to maximize effectiveness and minimize adverse effects [6].

Apply sunscreen before repellent. Use separate sunscreen and repellent products; sunscreen requires more frequent reapplication than repellent.

Apply repellent to exposed skin, clothing, or both; do not apply under clothing.

Use repellent over intact skin only; do not use over wounds or over skin that is inflamed, sunburned, or eczematous.

Use just enough repellent to lightly cover but not saturate the skin.

For application to the face, dispense repellent into the palms and rub hands together, then apply a thin layer to the face.

Do not apply repellent to children's hands; adults should dispense repellent into their own hands, then spread it on the child's exposed skin [7].

After application, wash repellent from hands to prevent contact with mouth, eyes, and genitals.

Once repellent is no longer needed, wash treated areas with soap and water.

Do not inhale aerosols or get aerosols into eyes; do not spray aerosols near food or in enclosed spaces.

TOPICAL REPELLENTS

Spectrum of activity — Repellents are variably useful in deterring mosquitoes, biting flies, fleas, midges, chiggers, and ticks [3].

Repellants are not useful for deterring arthropods that bite or sting in self-defense; these include bees, wasps, ants, spiders, centipedes, and others. They are also not for preventing bedbug bites.

Repellents are most effective in areas where vectors feed in the early evening (as with many South American and Asian vectors), rather than later in the night (as with African vectors such as Anopheles gambiae).

Repellents may be more effective in regions with zoophilic vectors (as in the Americas and South Asia – where mosquitoes may be diverted from a repellent-treated person to an animal) than in regions with anthropophilic vectors (eg, Africa).

Arthropods are attracted to humans by body heat, odors on the skin, vibrations, and carbon dioxide. The active ingredients in repellents help ward off arthropods but do not kill them.

Preferred agents — N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) is considered the "gold standard" of insect repellents; it has been in use since the 1950s and provides the longest duration of protection [8-11]. Picaridin is a reasonable alternative for individuals who wish to avoid the unpleasant characteristics of DEET and are willing to accept a potentially less effective or shorter-acting repellent.

N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET) — DEET has activity against mosquitoes, ticks, biting flies, chiggers, fleas, midges, and sand flies [8,11,12].

Duration of protection – DEET is available in concentrations ranging from <10 percent to >75 percent [13].

Mosquitoes – DEET (10 percent concentration) is effective for approximately two hours; DEET (24 percent concentration) is effective for approximately five hours [8].

Products with 10 to 35 percent DEET are adequate in most circumstances. Higher concentrations should be reserved for situations in which insect infestation is high or time outdoors will exceed three to four hours.

Microencapsulated formulations (such as Ultrathon [brand name], a 34 percent DEET lotion) increase the duration of protection while reducing skin absorption [14].

The efficacy of DEET plateaus at approximately 50 percent concentration; higher concentrations may provide longer duration of protection, but are associated with increased risk of skin irritation [2]. The duration of protection is shortened by swimming, washing, sweating, wiping, exercise, and rain [13,15].

Ticks – DEET provides protection against ticks at higher concentrations than used for mosquitoes [13,16]. For this reason, we do not rely exclusively on DEET for protection against ticks; topical repellents should be used in conjunction with permethrin-treated clothing for optimal protection, especially since ticks commonly gain access to areas underneath clothing where topical repellents are not applied. (See 'Permethrin-treated clothing' below.)

Use in children – In children, adverse neurologic effects (eg, encephalopathy) have been reported in the setting of inappropriate use (oral ingestion or repeated exposure to high concentrations) [11,17]. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis in a child following the inhalation of a DEET-containing insect repellent has also been described [18].

Recommendations regarding specific age thresholds for using DEET in children vary:

In the United States, health and regulatory authorities (including the American Academy of Pediatrics, Environmental Protection Agency, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) consider DEET to be safe for children of all ages when used as directed [7,19-21]; prior guidelines supported the use of 10 percent DEET for children ≥2 months of age [22,23].

In contrast, Canadian authorities (Canadian Pediatric Society, Health Canada) suggest that DEET not be applied to infants <6 months of age; alternatively, these groups suggest use of a mosquito net when outdoors [24].

Use in pregnancy Guidance for use of DEET in pregnant and lactating patients does not differ from that for nonpregnant adults [19,25,26].

In a randomized trial of insect repellents for malaria prevention among 897 pregnant patients, no adverse neurologic, gastrointestinal, or dermatologic effects were observed among the women or their infants [27].

There are no human data for first-trimester exposure. First-trimester exposure in rats and rabbits did not result in an increased risk of malformations in offspring [28].

Adverse effects – Serious adverse reactions to DEET are uncommon.

DEET can produce an oily, sticky skin sensation. Excessive skin absorption can cause dermatitis, allergic reactions, and rare neurotoxicity [29].

DEET may reduce the efficacy of sunscreens applied simultaneously.

DEET can damage some plastics and items made from synthetic fibers. It may dissolve mosquito nets, spandex, rayon, and leather, as well as plastic eyeglass frames and watches.

Adverse effects in children are discussed above.  

Picaridin (KBR 3023) — Picaridin, a plant-derived piperidine compound, has activity against mosquitoes, ticks, and the phlebotomine sand fly [30-34].

Duration of protection

Mosquitoes – For protection against mosquitoes, the efficacy of picaridin appears comparable to lower concentrations of DEET (≤30 percent) in many circumstances. However, higher concentrations of DEET (>50 percent) provide more effective protection than picaridin [35].

Ticks – For protection against ticks, a trial comparing picaridin (20 percent) with DEET (20 percent) demonstrated efficacy for one hour and two hours, respectively [33].

Because ticks commonly gain access to areas of skin where topical repellents are not applied, particularly underneath clothing, topical repellents should be used in conjunction with permethrin-treated clothing for optimal protection. (See 'Permethrin-treated clothing' below.)

Adverse effects

Picaridin is odorless and leaves no residue. It does not irritate skin, stain fabrics, or degrade plastics.

No toxicity in humans has been reported [7]. Accidental ingestions do not cause serious harm [36].

No studies in human pregnancy have been published; based on available data, picaridin is unlikely to cause problems in pregnancy if used correctly. No developmental or reproductive toxicity has been observed in animal studies [37].

Alternative agents — Repellents that may be adequate in lower risk settings include oil of lemon eucalyptus (PMD), ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate (IR3535), and BioUD (2-undecanone); however, these agents are less well studied.

PMD — PMD (chemical name: para-menthane-3,8-diol, the synthesized version of oil of lemon eucalyptus) is the active ingredient in oil of lemon eucalyptus. PMD has activity against mosquitoes, biting flies, and gnats [38].

Duration of protection – Studies of efficacy are limited and have yielded inconsistent results [39,40]. Some data suggest a PMD concentration of 30 to 40 percent may be effective for approximately four to five hours [41,42].

Adverse effects Adverse effects include skin and eye irritation; neither is common [43]. PMD has not been adequately tested in children <3 years of age and should not be used in this group [4].

IR3535 — IR3535 is a synthetic mosquito repellent.

There are limited studies comparing IR3535 with DEET or picaridin [32,44,45]. In one study, IR3535 appeared to be the least effective of the three repellents, although in another study, IR3535 compared favorably with DEET [32,45].

IR3535 should not be relied upon in malaria-endemic areas [46].

BioUD (2-undecanone) — BioUD is a tomato-derived mosquito repellent.

Efficacy data are limited; in one report comparing BioUD (7.75 percent concentration) with DEET (25 and 30 percent), the repellency of BioUD was comparable to that of DEET [47].

Agents with minimal or no effectiveness — Other agents marketed as insect repellents include citronella, various botanical oils, vitamin supplements, and herbal preparations.

Citronella – Citronella is a plant-based repellent that lacks the broad spectrum of activity and duration of action of DEET [8,11]. Frequent application may compensate for its limited duration of effectiveness; however, in animal studies, citronella-based repellents have been shown to be potential dermal sensitizers [8]. Citronella probably is not effective in repelling ticks.

Botanical oils – Various botanical oils, including cinnamon, peppermint, sandalwood, geranium, and soybean, have been used alone or in combination for repelling mosquitoes and ticks [48]. Most studies evaluating these plant-based repellents formulated into commercial products have shown that they provide inferior protection compared with DEET, picaridin, or PMD [44,49,50].  

Oral agents – Claims that ingestion of strong-smelling foods or other substances can repel biting insects (such as garlic, onions, cruciferous vegetables, or mineral sulfur) have not been substantiated.

Vitamin supplements or herbal remedies – No scientific study of ingested vitamins or herbal remedies has shown these interventions to protect from biting insects [51].

Repellent bracelets – Bracelets and wristbands impregnated with insect repellents are not effective [8,52].

Electronic devices – Electronic devices emit high-pitched sounds that are generally inaudible to the human ear. A Cochrane review including 10 studies concluded there was no evidence that these devices repel mosquitoes to any degree [53].

PERMETHRIN-TREATED CLOTHING — 

Permethrin is a synthetic compound applied to clothing or bedding (but not to skin) for the prevention of insect bites. Permethrin is active against mosquitoes, flies, ticks, and chiggers.

MechanismPermethrin is an insecticide and an acaricide. It causes nervous system toxicity to insects; insects encountering permethrin-treated material become unable to move normally if they remain in contact for even a short amount of time [54].

Permethrin resistance is increasing among several mosquito species worldwide [55], although resistant arthropods may still be repelled by the compound [56]. (See "Malaria: Epidemiology, prevention, and elimination", section on 'Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs)'.)

Use Permethrin is available as a spray for the treatment of clothing and gear. Factory-permethrin-impregnated clothing is also available.

Fabrics should be sprayed on both sides for 30 to 45 seconds and allowed to dry completely before wearing. One application maintains potency for at least two weeks, even after several washings [57,58].

Several studies have indicated a substantial loss of permethrin after clothing is worn and laundered over an extended time, reducing protection to suboptimal levels [59-62]. Retreatment or replacement, semi-annually or annually, may be needed.

Efficacy

Mosquitoes – In a study of permethrin-treated military uniforms, protection from mosquito bites results with mosquito species, ranging from 68 percent bite reduction after 30 washes to 100 percent protection after 50 washes [63].

Ticks – In a randomized trial, subjects wearing treated permethrin-treated clothing were 3.36 times less likely to have nymphal Ixodes scapularis ticks attach to their skin than subjects wearing untreated clothing. In addition, ticks that did attach to subjects with treated clothing were more likely to be dead within 2.5 hours of attachment [64].

Permethrin-treated clothing should be used in conjunction with topical repellants for optimal tick protection; this is because ticks commonly gain access to areas of skin where topical repellents are not applied.

Adverse effects – Toxicity in humans is low [11]. Products made with permethrin carry no warnings about use in children or pregnant women.

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — 

UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topic (see "Patient education: Insect bites and stings (The Basics)")

Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient education: Bee and insect stings (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Prevention goals – Goals for prevention of arthropod bites include reducing the risk of arthropod-borne infections (such as malaria, dengue fever, Zika virus infection, yellow fever, and others) and avoiding the nuisance of biting arthropods (such as itching and local bite reactions). (See 'Prevention goals' above.)

Mosquito bites (see 'Preventing mosquito bites' above)

Regions with high risk of mosquito-borne disease transmission (such as in malaria-endemic areas) – The most effective approach to preventing mosquito bites in these regions includes application of topical repellent to exposed skin, combined with use of permethrin-treated clothing.

For choice of topical repellent, we favor N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET; 10 to 35 percent), given its favorable efficacy and durability. Microencapsulated formulations provide longer duration of protection with lower repellant concentrations.

Picaridin (up to 30 percent) is reasonable for individuals who wish to avoid the unpleasant characteristics of DEET (which may include skin irritation, damage to some materials) and are willing to accept a potentially less effective or shorter-acting repellent.

Regions with low risk of mosquito-borne disease transmission – For individuals who wish to avoid nuisance mosquito bites in these regions, reasonable approaches include applying topical repellent (DEET or picaridin), with optional use of permethrin-treated clothing.

Less studied repellents include oil of lemon eucalyptus (PMD), ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate (IR3535), and BioUD (2-undecanone). Available data suggest these are less effective than DEET or picaridin.

Behavioral interventions – Interventions to reduce the risk of mosquito bites include modifying activities to avoid mosquito bites, eliminating standing water, and maintaining screens on windows and doors.

Tick bites (see 'Preventing tick bites' above)

Prevention – The most effective approach to tick bite prevention includes application of topical repellent (DEET or picaridin) to exposed skin, combined with use of permethrin-treated clothing. Use of permethrin-treated clothing is important because ticks commonly gain access to areas of skin where topical repellents are not applied.

Behavioral interventions – Interventions to reduce the risk of tick bites include dressing to minimize tick access to skin and visual inspection of the skin after time spent outdoors.

Application technique Insect repellents should be applied to maximize effectiveness and minimize adverse effects, as described above. (See 'Application technique' above.)

  1. Gryseels C, Uk S, Sluydts V, et al. Factors influencing the use of topical repellents: implications for the effectiveness of malaria elimination strategies. Sci Rep 2015; 5:16847.
  2. Nguyen QD, Vu MN, Hebert AA. Insect repellents: An updated review for the clinician. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:123.
  3. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2024/environmental-hazards-risks/mosquitoes-ticks-and-other-arthropods#repel (Accessed on February 20, 2025).
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Yellow Book, 2020. Chapter 3. Environmental Hazards & Other Noninfectious Health Risks. Mosquitoes, Ticks & Other Arthropods. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2020/noninfectious-health-risks/mosquitoes-ticks-and-other-arthropods (Accessed on July 29, 2019).
  5. Ho BM, Davis HE, Forrester JD, et al. Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Tick-Borne Illness in the United States. Wilderness Environ Med 2021; 32:474.
  6. https://www.epa.gov/insect-repellents/using-insect-repellents-safely-and-effectively (Accessed on February 19, 2025).
  7. 2021. "Prevention of Mosquitoborne and Tickborne Infections", Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics, David W. Kimberlin, MD, FAAP, Elizabeth D. Barnett, MD, FAAP, Ruth Lynfield, MD, FAAP, Mark H. Sawyer, MD, FAAP.
  8. Fradin MS, Day JF. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:13.
  9. Katz TM, Miller JH, Hebert AA. Insect repellents: historical perspectives and new developments. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58:865.
  10. Pickett JA, Birkett MA, Logan JG. DEET repels ORNery mosquitoes. PNAS 2008; 105:36.
  11. Fradin MS. Mosquitoes and mosquito repellents: a clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:931.
  12. Alzogaray RA, Fontan A, Zerba EN. Repellency of deet to nymphs of Triatoma infestans. Med Vet Entomol 2000; 14:6.
  13. Insect repellents. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2003; 45:41.
  14. Kasting GB, Bhatt VD, Speaker TJ. Microencapsulation decreases the skin absorption of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET). Toxicol In Vitro 2008; 22:548.
  15. Schofield S, Tepper M, Gadawski R. Laboratory and Field Evaluation of the Impact of Exercise on Performance of Regular and Polymer-Based Deet Repellents. Vector Control 2007; 44:6.
  16. Insect repellents. Med Lett Drugs Ther 1989; 31:45.
  17. Briassoulis G, Narlioglou M, Hatzis T. Toxic encephalopathy associated with use of DEET insect repellents: a case analysis of its toxicity in children. Hum Exp Toxicol 2001; 20:8.
  18. Morton R, Brooks M, Eid N. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis in a child associated with direct inhalation exposure of an insect repellent containing DEET. Pediatr Asthma Allergy Immunol 2006; 19:44.
  19. Koren G, Matsui D, Bailey B. DEET-based insect repellents: safety implications for children and pregnant and lactating women. CMAJ 2003; 169:209.
  20. Balk SJ. Choosing an insect repellent for your child. HealthyChildren.org. Available at: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/safety-prevention/at-play/Pages/Insect-Repellents.aspx (Accessed on March 01, 2024).
  21. Using insect repellents safely and effectively. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/insect-repellents/using-insect-repellents-safely-and-effectively#children (Accessed on March 01, 2024).
  22. Garrettson L. Commentary--DEET: caution for children still needed. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997; 35:443.
  23. Get kids outdoors and use these safety tips to ward off insects and precent sunburn. 2021 news release. American Academy of Pediatrics. Available at: https://www.aap.org/en/news-room/news-releases/health--safety-tips/american-academy-of-pediatrics-get-kids-outdoors-and-use-these-safety-tips-to-ward-off-insects-and-prevent-sunburn/#:~:text=The%20AAP%20recommends%20that%20repellents,time%20kids%20will%20be%20outside (Accessed on March 01, 2024).
  24. Health Canada. Personal insect repellents. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/about-pesticides/insect-repellents.html (Accessed on March 01, 2024).
  25. N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET). MotherToBaby. Available at: https://mothertobaby.org/fact-sheets/deet-nn-ethyl-m-toluamide-pregnancy/ (Accessed on April 29, 2024).
  26. Wylie BJ, Hauptman M, Woolf AD, Goldman RH. Insect Repellants During Pregnancy in the Era of the Zika Virus. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128:1111.
  27. McGready R, Hamilton KA, Simpson JA, et al. Safety of the insect repellent N,N-diethyl-M-toluamide (DEET) in pregnancy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001; 65:285.
  28. Schoenig GP, Neeper-Bradley TL, Fisher LC, Hartnagel RE Jr. Teratologic evaluations of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in rats and rabbits. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1994; 23:63.
  29. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Seizures temporally associated with use of DEET insect repellent--New York and Connecticut. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1989; 38:678.
  30. Badolo A, Ilboudo-Sanogo E, Ouédraogo AP, Costantini C. Evaluation of the sensitivity of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to two insect repellents: DEET and KBR 3023. Trop Med Int Health 2004; 9:330.
  31. Frances SP, Waterson DG, Beebe NW, Cooper RD. Field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and picaridin against mosquitoes in Northern Territory, Australia. J Med Entomol 2004; 41:414.
  32. Costantini C, Badolo A, Ilboudo-Sanogo E. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2004; 98:644.
  33. Pretorius AM, Jensenius M, Clarke F, Ringertz SH. Repellent efficacy of DEET and KBR 3023 against Amblyomma hebraeum (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 2003; 40:245.
  34. Klun JA, Khrimian A, Debboun M. Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and Deet suppress human blood feeding by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi. J Med Entomol 2006; 43:34.
  35. Goodyer L, Schofield S. Mosquito repellents for the traveller: does picaridin provide longer protection than DEET? J Travel Med 2018; 25:S10.
  36. Charlton NP, Murphy LT, Parker Cote JL, Vakkalanka JP. The toxicity of picaridin containing insect repellent reported to the National Poison Data System. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2016; 54:655.
  37. United States Environmental Protection Agency. New pesticide fact sheet. Picaridin. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-070705_01-May-05.pdf (Accessed on August 29, 2018).
  38. United States Environmental Protection Agency. p-Menthane-3,8-diol (011550) Fact Sheet. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-011550_01-Apr-00.pdf (Accessed on August 29, 2018).
  39. Carroll SP, Loye J. PMD, a registered botanical mosquito repellent with deet-like efficacy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2006; 22:507.
  40. Rodriguez SD, Drake LL, Price DP, et al. The Efficacy of Some Commercially Available Insect Repellents for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae). J Insect Sci 2015; 15:140.
  41. Barnard DR, Bernier UR, Posey KH, Xue RD. Repellency of IR3535, KBR3023, para-menthane-3,8-diol, and deet to black salt marsh mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Everglades National Park. J Med Entomol 2002; 39:895.
  42. Xue RD, Qualls WA, Smith ML, et al. Field evaluation of the Off! Clip-on Mosquito Repellent (metofluthrin) against Aedes albopictus and Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) in northeastern Florida. J Med Entomol 2012; 49:652.
  43. Frost AC. Oil of lemon eucalyptus as an insect repellent. Alt Med Alert 2005; 8:85.
  44. Insect repellents: which keep bugs at bay? Consum Rep 2006; 71:6.
  45. Cilek JE, Petersen JL, Hallmon CE. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2004; 20:299.
  46. Lupi E, Hatz C, Schlagenhauf P. The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review. Travel Med Infect Dis 2013; 11:374.
  47. Witting-Bissinger BE, Stumpf CF, Donohue KV, et al. Novel arthropod repellent, BioUD, is an efficacious alternative to deet. J Med Entomol 2008; 45:891.
  48. Maia MF, Moore SJ. Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing. Malar J 2011; 10 Suppl 1:S11.
  49. Girgenti P, Suss L. [Repellent activity against Aedes aegypti (L.) of formulas based on natural vegetable extracts or synthetic active agents]. Ann Ig 2002; 14:205.
  50. Ritchie SA, Williams CR, Montgomery BL. Field evaluation of New Mountain Sandalwood Mosquito Sticks and New Mountain Sandalwood Botanical Repellent against mosquitoes in North Queensland, Australia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2006; 22:158.
  51. Day JF. Repellent Wars. http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/pestalert/arbovirus/repellentwars.pdf (Accessed on August 29, 2018).
  52. Rodriguez SD, Chung HN, Gonzales KK, et al. Efficacy of Some Wearable Devices Compared with Spray-On Insect Repellents for the Yellow Fever Mosquito, Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). J Insect Sci 2017; 17.
  53. Enayati AA, Hemingway J, Garner P. Electronic mosquito repellents for preventing mosquito bites and malaria infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; :CD005434.
  54. Prose R, Breuner NE, Johnson TL, et al. Contact Irritancy and Toxicity of Permethrin-Treated Clothing for Ixodes scapularis, Amblyomma americanum, and Dermacentor variabilis Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol 2018; 55:1217.
  55. Kasai S, Komagata O, Itokawa K, et al. Mechanisms of pyrethroid resistance in the dengue mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti: target site insensitivity, penetration, and metabolism. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8:e2948.
  56. Bowman NM, Akialis K, Cave G, et al. Pyrethroid insecticides maintain repellent effect on knock-down resistant populations of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0196410.
  57. Schreck CE, McGovern TP. Repellents and other personal protection strategies against Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1989; 5:247.
  58. Gupta RK, Rutledge LC, Reifenrath WG, et al. Effects of weathering on fabrics treated with permethrin for protection against mosquitoes. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1989; 5:176.
  59. Connally NP, Rose DA, Breuner NE, et al. Impact of Wearing and Washing/Drying of Permethrin-Treated Clothing on Their Contact Irritancy and Toxicity for Nymphal Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) Ticks. J Med Entomol 2019; 56:199.
  60. Richards SL, Driver J, Dyer MC, et al. Assessing Durability and Safety of Permethrin Impregnated Uniforms Used by Outdoor Workers to Prevent Tick Bites after One Year of Use. J Med Entomol 2022; 59:615.
  61. Londono-Renteria B, Patel JC, Vaughn M, et al. Long-Lasting Permethrin-Impregnated Clothing Protects Against Mosquito Bites in Outdoor Workers. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015; 93:869.
  62. Davidson SA, Nun DJ, Chellaraj AH, et al. Reduced effectiveness of permethrin-treated military uniforms after prolonged wear measured by contact irritancy and toxicity bioassays with Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs. J Med Entomol 2024; 61:1181.
  63. Frances SP, Sferopoulos R, Lee B. Protection From Mosquito Biting Provided by Permethrin-Treated Military Fabrics. J Med Entomol 2014; 51:1220.
  64. Miller NJ, Rainone EE, Dyer MC, et al. Tick bite protection with permethrin-treated summer-weight clothing. J Med Entomol 2011; 48:327.
Topic 4085 Version 30.0

References