ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Cesarean birth: Postoperative care, complications, and long-term sequelae

Cesarean birth: Postoperative care, complications, and long-term sequelae
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Apr 05, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — This topic will discuss the postoperative care of patients who have undergone cesarean birth and discuss potential complications and long-term sequelae of this procedure. Preoperative and intraoperative issues are reviewed separately:

(See "Cesarean birth: Preoperative planning and patient preparation".)

(See "Cesarean birth: Surgical technique".)

POSTOPERATIVE CARE — The following sections apply specifically to issues postcesarean birth. General issues related to the postpartum period are discussed extensively elsewhere:

(See "Overview of the postpartum period: Normal physiology and routine maternal care".)

(See "Overview of the postpartum period: Disorders and complications".)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines — The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society has published a three-part ERAS Cesarean Delivery Guideline for perioperative care of patients undergoing scheduled or unscheduled cesarean birth [1-3]. The maternally-focused pathway begins 30 to 60 minutes before the skin incision is made and ends at hospital discharge. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [4] as well as other organizations and many hospitals have also created such guidelines/pathways [5]. These approaches appear to reduce postoperative complications, reduce postoperative pain scores and opioid use, and shorten hospital stay without compromising readmission rates [6-8]. However, guidelines vary and their recommendations are often based on expert opinion and evidence from observational studies.

Thromboprophylaxis — (See "Cesarean birth: Preoperative planning and patient preparation", section on 'Thromboembolism prophylaxis'.)

Prophylaxis against hemorrhage — The author administers the same oxytocin dose after vaginal or cesarean birth. Some clinicians use a higher oxytocin dose for high-risk intrapartum cesareans. (See "Management of the third stage of labor: Prophylactic pharmacotherapy to minimize hemorrhage", section on 'Administration'.)

Whether dosing should be adjusted based on vaginal versus cesarean birth, scheduled cesarean versus intrapartum cesarean (especially after oxytocin induction or augmentation of labor), and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage has not been studied extensively; protocols vary among institutions. The author accounts for higher-risk clinical settings by administering a combination of medications (eg, oxytocin plus misoprostol or oxytocin plus tranexamic acid). (See "Management of the third stage of labor: Prophylactic pharmacotherapy to minimize hemorrhage", section on 'Do delivery characteristics affect oxytocin dosing?'.)

Skin-to-skin contact — Skin-to-skin contact should begin, ideally, at birth. The mother can watch the birth through transparent drapes, the partner/support person can cut the cord, and the mother can start skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding during surgery or right after it is completed. Skin-to-skin contact promotes breastfeeding and maternal-newborn bonding and appears to have physiological benefits for newborns during transition to extra-uterine life [9,10].

Maternal monitoring — In the immediate postoperative period, vital signs, uterine tone, vaginal and incisional bleeding, and urine output are monitored closely. (See "Overview of the postpartum period: Normal physiology and routine maternal care", section on 'Postpartum findings and changes'.)

Because severe vital sign abnormalities often precede clinical recognition of critical illness, Maternal Early Warning Criteria (MEWC) (table 1) and differential diagnoses for these abnormalities (table 2) have been developed to speed identification and treatment of potentially serious maternal disorders, and thereby reduce maternal morbidity and mortality [11,12]. The criteria do not identify every maternal complication nor are they designed to replace clinical judgment; however, in a prospective observational study of over 1000 births, a similar system (Maternal Early Obstetric Warning System [MEOWS]) had positive and negative predictive values of 54 and 97 percent, respectively, for the identification of maternal morbidity [13]. Tachycardia >120/min and hypotension <90 mmHg are predictive of need for relaparotomy [14].

Laboratory testing — After planned or unplanned cesarean births, routine postoperative hemoglobin testing is probably unnecessary in asymptomatic patients without predelivery anemia or excessive bleeding at delivery because the information does not lead to improved outcomes [15,16]. Nevertheless, providers often check for anemia postpartum as a prudent approach.

Pain management — The goals for effective post-cesarean delivery analgesia are to allow maternal-neonatal bonding, facilitate postoperative mobilization and the ability for the mother to care for their infant, minimize opioid use, and allow safe breast feeding. We use multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia for all patients, and tailor the specific approach based on whether the patient received neuraxial or general anesthesia for surgery. Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be administered around the clock, starting in the operating room. Neuroaxial opioids should also be administered routinely in patients with neuroaxial anesthesia (table 3). In addition to pharmacotherapy, placing an abdominal binder at the end of surgery or in the recovery room can improve patient comfort and mobility, with no more than minimal risk of adverse effects (eg, impaired the respiratory function) [17,18]. Options and dosing for post-cesarean analgesia are discussed in detail separately. (See "Post-cesarean delivery analgesia".)

In a prospective study of 621 patients in Brazil who had a planned cesarean birth, the proportion using analgesia for surgery-related pain at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after discharge was approximately 96, 36, 16, and 17 percent, respectively; importantly, none used opioid analgesia after hospital discharge [19]. Severe pain in the early postoperative period, smoking, and presurgical anxiety were risk factors for prolonged postsurgical pain.

Bladder catheter — Removing the catheter as soon as practical (ie, immediately after the skin is closed) minimizes the risk of infection. There is no evidence that routine urine culture or a trial of catheter clamping is useful before removal of the bladder catheter [20,21]. In a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal time for urinary catheter removal following cesarean birth (19 studies, 3086 participants), compared with removal 0 to 6 hours, removal at 6.1 to 12, 12.1 to 24, and >24 hours after cesarean birth was more likely to result in urinary tract infection (pooled OR 5.95, 11.26, and 27.25, respectively) [22]. 

Although another meta-analysis reported that antibiotic administration prior to catheter removal reduced the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection [23], there were multiple limitations to these trials. We do not administer antibiotic prophylaxis before removing the bladder catheter. (See "Catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults", section on 'Prevention'.)

Resumption of micturition in the four to six hours after removal of the urinary catheter should be verified, and the physician alerted if urinary retention exceeds six hours. Evaluation and management of such patients is reviewed separately. (See "Postoperative urinary retention in females".)

Early ambulation — Early ambulation is encouraged, although data showing improved outcomes after cesarean birth are limited.

Early resumption of ambulation (ie, as soon as the effects of anesthesia have abated) has been associated with faster intestinal recovery and reduction in ileus and venous thrombosis [24]. We suggest that patients ambulate for at least 5 to 10 minutes at least four times per day beginning about four hours after the skin closure. In a randomized trial, use of a digital step counter on the wrist (pedometer) within the first 48 hours after cesarean birth combined with personalized feedback by research staff regarding number of steps taken and suggestions for improvement resulted in >1700 more steps taken per day, easier physical and mental recovery, and higher maternal satisfaction compared with use of pedometer alone [25].

Early oral food intake and gum chewing — In meta-analyses, early oral intake (both fluids and solid food) as soon as two hours after cesarean birth was well-tolerated and had no adverse effects on time to bowel action/passing flatus or frequency of nausea, vomiting, paralytic ileus, or analgesic use [26,27]. Early oral intake may enhance the return of bowel function by stimulating the gastrocolic reflex.

Chewing gum at least three times per day for at least 15 minutes until the first flatus appears to accelerate postoperative gastrointestinal recovery (eg, first passage of flatus, first bowel movement) [28,29]. (See "Measures to prevent prolonged postoperative ileus".)

Lifting — It is common practice to advise patients to avoid lifting anything heavier than the newborn. Heavy lifting and lifting from a squat position confer the greatest increases in intraabdominal pressure [30,31]. These activities should probably be minimized in the first one to two weeks of wound healing, although there are no high-quality data regarding the impact of increased intraabdominal pressure on wound healing [32]. Some surgeons suggest that patients avoid lifting >13 pounds (6 kg) from the floor for four to six weeks following abdominal surgery to minimize stress on the healing fascia based on data that unsutured fascial wounds achieve 30 to 50 percent of unwounded tissue strength after four to six weeks [33]; the recovery of sutured wounds may be faster. However, no evidence-based guidelines are available, and waiting one to two months before lifting >13 pounds (6 kg) from the floor can be difficult for mothers with other small children. In fact, some evidence suggests that lifting 20 pounds, climbing stairs, and abdominal crunches generate no more intraabdominal force than rising from a chair [30].

Exercise — Patients may gradually increase aerobic training activities, depending on their level of discomfort and postpartum complications. Guidelines are described separately. (See "Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period", section on 'After cesarean birth'.)

In a meta-analysis of randomized trials, postnatal initiation of structured pelvic floor muscle training had no clear benefit for prevention or treatment of urinary or fecal incontinence, although the quality of data was low to very low [34]. If performed based on favorable results from some trials [35,36], Kegel pelvic floor muscle exercises can be started when contracting the pelvic floor is not painful. (See "Female urinary incontinence: Treatment", section on 'Pelvic floor muscle (Kegel) exercises'.)

Driving — Patients should avoid driving if they are taking opioids or other sedatives or if they have pain with the normal activities required of a driver (eg, turning the body or head, stepping on the brake/accelerator/clutch, steering).

Breastfeeding — Ideally breastfeeding is initiated in the delivery room. The usual drugs/procedures associated with cesarean birth are not a contraindication to breastfeeding. Information about use of drugs during breastfeeding is available in the drug interactions program included with UpToDate and in the LactMed drugs and lactation database. (See "Initiation of breastfeeding".)

Wound care

Timing of dressing removal – For a clean surgical wound, epithelialization typically occurs in the 48 hours after surgery. The superficial layer of epithelium creates a barrier to bacteria and other foreign bodies; however, it is very thin, easily traumatized, and provides little tensile strength.

Although data from randomized trials are limited, removal of dressings from clean or clean/contaminated surgical wounds within 48 hours of surgery (ie, the period of epithelization) appears to have no detrimental effect on outcomes, compared with removal after 48 hours [37]. In most patients, we remove the initial dressing 6 (preferably) to 24 hours after cesarean. A trial involving 320 patients who underwent scheduled cesarean birth reported no detrimental effects from dressing removal at six versus 24 hours postsurgery [38].

Dressing removal – Adhesive dressings should be removed slowly, in the direction of hair growth, at an angle of 150° to the skin, thus pulling the tape over itself [39].

Showering – There is no conclusive evidence of harm from postoperative showering within 48 hours of surgery in patients with closed surgical wounds [40].

Suture/staple removal – We typically reapproximate the skin with an absorbable subcuticular suture, so removal is unnecessary. Nonabsorbable sutures are rarely used for skin closure. They are typically removed within the first post-operative week as soon as the wound is able to hold itself together and then skin tape is applied to reduce tension, but evidence is limited.

If staples are used (eg, patient's preference based on prior experience) and the skin incision is transverse, we remove the staples 4 to 6 days postoperatively but consider keeping the staples in up to 10 days postoperatively in those with risk factors for wound complications, such as patients with diabetes mellitus or obesity. If the skin incision is vertical, the staples are left in place for at least five to seven days and longer in a patient at high risk of wound complications since there is more tension on the skin edges of a vertical incision. Adhesive strips may be applied after removal of the staples to help keep the wound edges approximated. In patients who scar easily, the scar that results from staples may be more pronounced than one produced by sutures, particularly if the staples are left in place for prolonged periods (>5 to 15 days, depending on the location).

Nausea and vomiting — Patients with a history of postoperative nausea and vomiting or motion sickness may benefit from chewing gum [24] and prophylactic antiemetic therapy. A variety of antiemetics is available (table 4). (See "Postoperative nausea and vomiting", section on 'Antiemetics'.)

Sexual activity — Sexual activity may resume when the patient is ready. In one study of nearly 400 cesarean births in Australia, nearly 50 percent of patients resumed vaginal intercourse by six weeks postpartum [41]. Contraceptive plans should have been discussed during the pregnancy and must be discussed before the patient leaves the hospital. (See "Contraception: Postpartum counseling and methods".)

COMPLICATIONS

Overview — The following sections focus on complications after cesarean birth. General issues related to complications in the postpartum period are discussed extensively elsewhere. (See "Overview of the postpartum period: Disorders and complications".)

The major non-anesthesia-related complications related to cesarean birth are surgical site infection (SSI) (figure 1), particularly superficial wound complications; hemorrhage; injury to pelvic organs; and thromboembolism. The risk of severe maternal morbidity is generally higher in after an unplanned cesarean birth during labor than after a scheduled prelabor cesarean birth [42,43]. Cesarean birth in the second stage of labor is generally associated with higher maternal composite morbidity than cesarean birth in the first stage of labor [44].

Data from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample showed that 76 in 1000 cesarean births (97 in 1000 primary and 48 in 1000 repeat cesarean births) were associated with at least 1 of 12 complications [45]. However, absolute complication rates vary widely across hospitals [46] and by patient risk factors [47]. Complications related to placenta accreta spectrum are a particular concern in patients undergoing repeat cesarean birth. (See "Placenta accreta spectrum: Clinical features, diagnosis, and potential consequences".)

Fever — An overview of fever in the surgical patient, including clinical manifestations, etiologies, evaluation, and diagnosis, is provided separately and summarized in the table (table 5). (See "Fever in the surgical patient" and "Overview of the postpartum period: Disorders and complications", section on 'Fever/infection/wound complications'.)

In the first 24 to 48 hours after cesarean birth, the most common causes of fever are endometritis, respiratory tract infection or extensive atelectasis, and pyelonephritis (see 'Endometritis' below and "Urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy", section on 'Acute pyelonephritis'). These disorders can be distinguished based on symptoms, physical examination, and basic laboratory tests (urine culture, complete blood count with differential, chest radiography [if respiratory symptoms/findings]). Most patients respond to broad spectrum antibiotic therapy; those who do not respond are most likely to have a resistant organism or surgical site infection. (See 'Wound complications' below.)

Some uncommon causes of persistent or late-onset fever include septic pelvic thrombophlebitis, pelvic abscess, retained productions of conception, and drug fever. (See 'Septic pelvic thrombophlebitis and ovarian vein thrombophlebitis' below and "Drug fever".)

The possibility of breast engorgement or breast infection (mastitis, abscess) should also be considered and can be diagnosed by physical examination. Breast engorgement generally occurs with the onset of lactation whereas infection is a late finding. (See "Common problems of breastfeeding and weaning", section on 'Engorgement' and "Common problems of breastfeeding and weaning", section on 'Breast infections'.)

Endometritis — In a review of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network prospective studies of cesarean birth (70,000 cesareans), the rate of endometritis was 6 percent for primary cesarean births performed before labor and 11 percent for cesarean births performed during labor [47]. Most patients received antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery. 

Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of postpartum endometritis are discussed in detail separately. (See "Postpartum endometritis" and "Cesarean birth: Preoperative planning and patient preparation", section on 'Antibiotic prophylaxis'.)

Wound complications — In the same review of MFMU Network prospective studies of cesarean birth mentioned above, wound complications (infection, hematoma, seroma, dehiscence) developed in 1 to 2 percent of primary cesarean births [47]. A meta-analysis of nonrandomized studies found that implementing an evidence-based bundle lowered the rate of SSI (pooled rate 6 percent at baseline versus 2 percent after the intervention, relative risk [RR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.25-0.43, number needed to treat 24) [48]. The bundles varied but included at least three of the following: antibiotic prophylaxis, use of clippers rather than razors, chlorhexidine skin preparation, enhancements to aseptic surgical technique, spontaneous placental removal with gentle traction, patient and staff education initiatives, and skin closure specifications.

Wound infection generally develops four to seven days after the cesarean. Risk factors include unscheduled or second-stage cesarean birth, obesity, chorioamnionitis, blood transfusion, anticoagulation therapy, alcohol or drug misuse, and subcutaneous hematoma [49-51]. Unscheduled cesarean birth is a major risk factor for wound complications, even when evidence-based interventions to reduce postcesarean birth wound complications have been administered [49]. In one study, 28 percent of such patients had a wound complication.

Early wound infections (in the first 24 to 48 hours) are usually due to group A or B beta-hemolytic Streptococcus and are characterized by high fever and cellulitis. Later infections are more likely to be due to Staphylococcus epidermidis or aureus, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, or cervicovaginal flora [52,53].

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rare but life-threatening complication (0.18 percent of cesarean births in one study [54]). (See "Necrotizing soft tissue infections".)

The basic principles of wound management and management of complications (role of antibiotics, debridement, topical therapy, dressings, packing, negative pressure, management of disruption) are reviewed in detail separately. (See "Basic principles of wound management" and "Overview of the evaluation and management of surgical site infection" and "Complications of abdominal surgical incisions", section on 'Surgical site infection'.)

Hemorrhage — The mean estimated blood loss at cesarean birth is approximately 1000 mL and 18 percent of primary cesarean births have a calculated blood loss >1500 mL; however, estimates of blood loss are not very reliable [55-57]. Routine administration of oxytocin after the newborn is delivered reduces postpartum blood loss and risk of hemorrhage. (See "Anesthesia for cesarean delivery", section on 'Administration of uterotonics'.)

In the same review of MFMU Network prospective studies of cesarean birth mentioned above, 2 to 4 percent of patients undergoing a primary cesarean birth received a blood transfusion [47]. Causes of hemorrhage include uterine atony, placenta accreta spectrum, extensive myometrial injury, and extension of the incision into the uterine vessels. (See "Overview of postpartum hemorrhage" and "Postpartum hemorrhage: Medical and minimally invasive management" and "Postpartum hemorrhage: Management approaches requiring laparotomy" and "Management of hematomas incurred as a result of obstetric delivery", section on 'Retroperitoneal hematomas'.)

Surgical injury — In the same review of MFMU Network prospective studies of cesarean birth mentioned above, a surgical injury (broad ligament hematoma, cystotomy, bowel injury, ureteral injury) occurred in 0.2 to 0.5 percent of patients undergoing a primary cesarean birth [47]. In another study of almost 30,000 primary and repeat cesarean births, the overall rate of lower urinary tract injury was 0.27 percent; 3 percent were ureteral and the remainder were full- or partial-thickness bladder injuries [58]. The risk of cystotomy is higher for cesareans performed in the second stage than in the first stage and in repeat cesareans [44,59].

Adhesions are one of the major risk factors for inadvertent surgical injury.

Diagnosis, management, and prevention of urinary tract and bowel injuries are discussed in detail separately. (See "Urinary tract injury in gynecologic surgery: Identification and management" and "Urinary tract injury in gynecologic surgery: Epidemiology and prevention" and "Complications of gynecologic surgery", section on 'Bowel injury'.)

Venous thromboembolism — A 2014 study using claims data from 1.7 million pregnancies reported that the frequency of a thrombotic event (ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolism [VTE]) was 44.8 per 100,000 cesarean births during the first six postpartum weeks [60]. This rate was significantly higher than the rate after vaginal birth during the first six postpartum weeks (14.5 per 100,000 vaginal births) and higher than the rate in postpartum weeks 7 to 12 (7.5 per 100,000 cesarean births).

In a 2016 meta-analysis of the risks of VTE after cesarean, the best estimate of the incidence of VTE following cesarean in the general obstetric population was 240 per 100,000 cesarean births [61]. In studies that reported VTE events separately by type of cesarean, the incidence of VTE was 160 per 100,000 for planned cesarean and 240 per 100,000 for emergency cesarean. Compared with vaginal birth, the best estimates of the odds of VTE following planned and emergency cesarean births were 2.1 and 2.8, respectively. Data on the use of thromboprophylaxis were rarely reported and thus prevented an estimate of its effect on VTE incidence.

Prophylaxis and treatment are reviewed separately. (See "Cesarean birth: Preoperative planning and patient preparation", section on 'Thromboembolism prophylaxis' and "Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and postpartum: Treatment".)

Maternal mortality — Maternal mortality after cesarean is rare in high income countries (eg, 13 of 100,000 cesareans in the United States [62], 22 of 100,000 cesareans in The Netherlands [63]). A significant proportion of the surgical mortality (and morbidity) of cesarean birth is related to the underlying medical and obstetric factors that necessitate the surgical delivery.

However, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), maternal mortality continues to be high. A 2019 systematic review that included nearly 3 million cesarean births in LMICs reported 760 maternal deaths per 100,000 procedures; the highest burden was in sub-Saharan Africa where there were 1090 maternal deaths per 100,000 procedures [64]. One-quarter of all maternal deaths in LMICs were in patients who had undergone a cesarean. The most common indication for cesarean in patients who died was failure to progress, which accounted for one-quarter of the procedures, and the most common cause of death was postpartum hemorrhage, which accounted for one-third of deaths. Interestingly, many cesareans were performed by nonphysicians, but these procedures were associated with a similar rate of maternal death as those performed by physicians (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.0). The authors observed high numbers of maternal deaths in countries with very low frequencies of cesarean birth, which suggests that limited access to the procedure is an indicator of limited access to the specialists, blood products, and other basic and critical care resources needed to prevent maternal death when complications arise. They also opined that lack of adequate antenatal care, lack of resources for planned cesarean birth when indicated, and delayed referral of patients with obstructed labor contributed to the high rate of maternal mortality.

Anesthetic complications — Complications of anesthesia are reviewed separately. (See "Anesthesia for cesarean delivery" and "Adverse effects of neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia for obstetrics".)

Ileus and colonic pseudo-obstruction — Adynamic ileus of moderate and severe intensity has been reported in 10 to 20 percent of postcesarean patients [65]. Estimates of the frequency of pathologic or prolonged ileus after cesarean birth are imprecise because ileus is a normal physiologic response to abdominopelvic surgery, definitions of pathologic or prolonged ileus differ, and multiple factors affect the risk of occurrence. Symptoms may include abdominal distention, bloating, and "gassiness"; diffuse, persistent abdominal pain; nausea and/or vomiting; delayed passage of or inability to pass flatus; and inability to tolerate an oral diet. Diagnosis, management, and prevention of postoperative ileus are discussed separately. (See "Postoperative ileus".)

Severe postoperative ileus after cesarean birth may be related to acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome), which is characterized by gross dilatation of the cecum and right hemicolon in the absence of an anatomic obstruction. (See "Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome)".)

Septic pelvic thrombophlebitis and ovarian vein thrombophlebitis — Ovarian vein thrombophlebitis (OVT) and deep septic pelvic thrombophlebitis (DSPT) are rare complications of cesarean birth. The two entities share common inflammatory pathogenic mechanisms and often occur together, but may differ in their clinical presentations and diagnostic findings. Patients with OVT usually present with fever and abdominal pain localized to the side of the affected vein within one week after delivery or surgery; thrombosis of the right ovarian vein is visualized radiographically in approximately 20 percent of cases. Patients with DSPT usually present within a few days after delivery or surgery with fever that persists despite antibiotics, in the absence of radiographic evidence of thrombosis. Abdominal or pelvic tenderness is notably absent. (See "Septic pelvic thrombophlebitis".)

Psychological outcome — Cesarean birth has been associated with an increased risk for postpartum depression [66]. Some patients express strong feelings of loss, failure, and anger after a cesarean birth [67]. These feelings are likely related, at least in part, to the anxiety associated with medical and obstetric complications necessitating abdominal delivery (especially unplanned abdominal delivery); the stress, pain, and fatigue associated with major surgery; and the patient's baseline psychological status. Better psychological outcomes may be realized by realistic preparation for childbirth, maternal involvement in decision making, and attention to the specific needs of patients who are both postpartum and postoperative [67].

Fetal and neonatal risks — Although cesarean birth is usually performed for the benefit of the fetus, the fetus is also at risk from cesarean birth. Risks include iatrogenic prematurity and birth trauma; the latter occurs in 1 to 3 percent of cesareans and consists mostly of mild lacerations related to emergency delivery [68].

Transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) is more common after scheduled cesarean birth, probably because exposure to labor initiates processes that enhance reabsorption of lung fluid. In a review of 29,669 births, the incidence of TTN was approximately threefold higher after planned cesarean than after vaginal birth (3.1 versus 1.1 percent) [69]. Cesarean birth has also been reported to be a modest risk factor for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), particularly if the cesarean was performed in a nonlaboring patient [70]. However, this study did not clearly discriminate between TTN and RDS. (See "Transient tachypnea of the newborn".)

In LMICs, perinatal mortality is also a concern. In the systematic review of cesarean birth in LMICs discussed above [64], perinatal mortality in offspring of patients who underwent cesarean birth was approximately 85 deaths per 1000 procedures. A high perinatal mortality rate is not surprising given the high rate of maternal mortality in these countries. (See 'Maternal mortality' above.)

LONG-TERM RISKS

Abnormal placentation — Cesarean birth significantly increases the risk of abnormal placentation in future pregnancies, and the risk increases with the number of cesarean births. Given the increased risks of abnormal placentation, experts commonly recommend that patients with a prior cesarean birth undergo ultrasound evaluation of the placental site in future pregnancies [71]. (See "Placenta accreta spectrum: Clinical features, diagnosis, and potential consequences".)

Previa and placenta accreta spectrum – The risk of placenta previa in the general obstetric population, after one cesarean birth, and after ≥3 cesarean births was 4 in 1000, 10 in 1000, and 28 in 1000 deliveries, respectively, in one review [72]. Patients with a previa and ≥3 cesarean births were at significantly increased risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), compared with those with a previa and no previous cesarean birth (PAS: 50 to 67 percent versus 3.3 to 4 percent). The risk of PAS increases with an increasing number of prior cesarean births, even in the absence of placenta previa. (See "Repeat cesarean birth", section on 'Complications relating to abnormal placentation'.)

Abruption – A prior cesarean birth is a risk factor for placental abruption [73-76], but the absolute risk is low and the association may be due to confounding [77]. (See "Acute placental abruption: Pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and consequences".)

Uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy — The incidence of uterine rupture is higher in patients who undergo a trial of labor after cesarean birth (TOLAC) than in those who undergo planned repeat cesarean delivery (PRCD). The incidence varies depending on the type and location of the prior uterine incision, as well as other factors. (See "Uterine rupture: After previous cesarean birth".)

Scar complications — Rarely, complications develop in the scars resulting from the hysterotomy or abdominal wall incision:

Cesarean scar defect – A cesarean scar defect is a thinning and indentation of the myometrium at the hysterotomy site that results from inadequate healing of the myometrium at this site. It has been called by various terms, including niche, isthmocele, and uteroperitoneal fistula. These defects are more common with increasing numbers of cesarean births, presumably because preexisting scar tissue negatively influences the healing of a new incision [78].

Potential complications of cesarean scar defects include cesarean scar pregnancy, postmenstrual spotting, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, uterine rupture, and secondary infertility [79-81]. In a modified Delphi study, a group of international experts specializing in the management of cesarean scar defects agreed that the constellation of symptoms resulting from such defects should be termed cesarean scar disorder [82].

Hypotheses for the pathogenesis of cesarean scar pregnancy include migration of the embryo through either a wedge defect in the lower uterine segment or a microscopic fistula within the scar, invasion of placental villi into the uterine wall at a point of scar dehiscence, and low oxygen tension of scar tissue attracting implantation of the fertilized oocyte. Symptoms and diagnosis are similar to tubal ectopic pregnancy. There are no data on the role of the interval between the previous cesarean birth and hysterotomy scar pregnancy occurrence or the effect of wound closure technique on its occurrence. (See "Cesarean scar pregnancy".)

The overall rate of ectopic pregnancy is not increased after cesarean birth [83].

Numbness or pain – Branches of the ilioinguinal nerve and the iliohypogastric nerve are severed by transverse abdominal incisions. This often causes persistent numbness in the region around the scar. Less commonly, patients have persistent, radiating pain due to nerve entrapment [84-88]. The diagnostic triad of nerve entrapment after surgery includes: (1) typical burning or lancinating pain near the incision that radiates to the area supplied by the nerve, (2) clear evidence of impaired sensory perception of the nerve, and (3) pain relieved by local infiltration with an anesthetic [86]. Treatment involves surgical repair of the scar with resection of the compromised nerve or nerve block. (See "Nerve injury associated with pelvic surgery".)

Incisional endometriosis – Incisional endometriosis has been reported in 0.03 to 0.45 percent of patients who have has a cesarean birth [89]. It presents as a tender, palpable mass in the incision [90,91]. The mass increases during menstruation and is associated with cyclic or continuous pain. Differential diagnosis includes incisional hernia. The diagnosis and management of endometriosis at unusual sites are discussed separately. (See "Endometriosis in adults: Pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical impact", section on 'Anatomy and staging'.)

Incisional hernia – In a study from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, cesarean birth was associated with an increased risk for incisional hernia compared with vaginal birth (1.0 versus 0.4 percent; odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% CI 2.5-3.0) [92]. (See "Clinical features, diagnosis, and prevention of incisional hernias".)

Adhesions and bowel obstruction — Abdominal surgery is associated with long-term risks from development of clinically significant adhesions. Adhesions can be completely asymptomatic or can cause significant morbidity and mortality related to bowel obstruction, infertility, or organ injury during repeat abdominal surgery. Formation of adhesions is common after cesarean birth, and the extent and density increase with increasing numbers of repeat cesarean births: the reported prevalence of adhesions is 12 to 46 percent of patients at their second cesarean and 26 to 75 percent of patients at their third cesarean [93-98], but the prevalence of small bowel obstruction is much lower [99-101]. In a population-based cohort study, the risk of small bowel obstruction among patients with a cesarean birth was 16.3 of 10,000 person-years versus 6.4 of 10,000 person-years in those without (OR 2.54, 95% CI 2.15-3.00), and an increasing number of cesarean births was associated with an increasing risk of small bowel obstruction (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.46-1.78, per additional cesarean birth) [102].

There is no convincing evidence to support use of adhesion barriers or closure of the peritoneum to prevent complications from adhesions after cesarean birth. (See "Cesarean birth: Surgical technique", section on 'Adhesion barriers' and "Cesarean birth: Surgical technique", section on 'Reapproximation of the peritoneum'.)

Subfertility — There is no convincing evidence of a causal relationship between cesarean birth in a first pregnancy and subfertility [103] or cesarean surgical technique and subfertility [104]. The effect of multiple cesareans on fertility has not been evaluated. However, there is evidence that subfertile pregnant patients are more likely to have a cesarean birth and that patients who have had a cesarean birth take longer to conceive future pregnancies [105].

In a meta-analysis (18 cohort studies, nearly 600,000 participants), patients who underwent a cesarean birth had 10 percent fewer subsequent pregnancies than those who gave birth vaginally [106]. In a another meta-analysis (one randomized trial, 79 cohort studies [all from high income countries], nearly 30 million participants), patients who had cesarean birth had a 60 percent increase in subfertility compared with those who had a vaginal birth (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95% CI 1.45-1.76), but subfertility was not defined [107]. This association appears to be due to confounding factors that affected both the need for cesarean birth and the choice of subsequent pregnancy [108,109].

Unexplained stillbirth — The effect of cesarean birth on future stillbirth is controversial. A meta-analysis reported a significant positive association between cesarean birth and antepartum stillbirth in a second pregnancy (pooled hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.77) [110]. The absolute risk difference was 0.1 percent; therefore, 1000 cesarean births would need to be avoided to prevent one additional antepartum stillbirth. The analysis excluded the largest published study, which included almost 1.8 million singleton second births in patients with no underlying medical conditions and no fetal structural or chromosomal abnormalities and found no association between previous cesarean and future term fetal demise [111]. This study was excluded from the analysis because it included intrapartum stillbirths, which may have a different etiology. In this study, the fetal death rates at term in those with and without a previous cesarean birth were 0.7 and 0.8 per 1000 births, respectively. In the entire cohort of over 11 million singleton births (second and subsequent births), the fetal death rates at term for patients with and without a previous cesarean were 0.4 and 0.6 per 1000 births, respectively.

An association between unexplained stillbirth and a prior cesarean birth observed in some studies may be due to residual confounding, but it is possible that scar tissue from a previous cesarean birth may lead to abnormal placental function leading to stillbirth.

Preterm birth — Cesarean birth appears to be associated with no more than a minimal increase in risk for subsequent preterm birth. In a meta-analysis (10 cohort studies, 10 million participants) comparing subsequent pregnancy outcomes after cesarean versus vaginal births, patients with a previous cesarean had a 12 percent increase in overall risk for preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.24) and a trend toward increased risk for very preterm birth (birth at 28 to 32 weeks: adjusted RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.80-1.68) [112]. The risk for spontaneous preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy appears to be highest for cesareans performed in the second stage at low station [113]. Future studies should further evaluate this possible association and possible causative factors (eg, incision placement, method of fetal extraction from a low station, previous attempt at operative vaginal birth).

Adverse effect on gut microbiota in the newborn

Allergic disease, obesity, infection in offspring — During the first few months of life, colonization of the gut microbiota in newborns appears to be impacted by the mode of birth [114,115]. It has been hypothesized that neonatal exposure to maternal flora during vaginal birth reduces the risk of developing allergic disorders (allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, food allergy), childhood/adolescent obesity, and infection-related hospitalization in early childhood. In support of this hypothesis, an association between cesarean birth and development of these disorders has been observed, particularly after planned cesarean birth or intrapartum cesarean birth before membrane rupture [116-123]. A confounding factor is that antibiotic prophylaxis is routine before a cesarean birth.

Role of vaginal seeding — In an attempt to restore normal neonatal colonization of cesarean-born neonates, a cotton gauze or cotton swab inoculated with maternal vaginal fluid has been used to wipe the mouth, nose, or skin of the newborn infant (called vaginal seeding). However, both the safety and effectiveness of this practice are unproven [124].

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others recommend that clinicians and patients avoid this practice, unless as part of an institutional review board-approved research protocol [125-127].

Neurodevelopmental outcome of offspring — In a meta-analysis of observational studies examining cesarean birth and neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in the offspring, compared with vaginal birth, cesarean birth was associated with increased odds of autism spectrum disorders (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.25-1.41) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.07-1.26) [128]. Risks were similar for emergency and planned procedures. More research is needed to understand if these associations are true and, if true, the reasons for the relationship. Confounders and ascertainment bias could account for the association in these observational studies [129].

FUTURE DELIVERY

Trial of labor after a cesarean — After a cesarean birth, the surgeon should describe the type and location of the uterine incision clearly in the operative note and begin a discussion with the patient about the feasibility of a trial of labor in a future pregnancy. (See "Choosing the route of delivery after cesarean birth".)

Repeat cesarean birth — Issues relating to repeat cesarean birth are discussed separately. (See "Repeat cesarean birth".)

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Cesarean birth".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topics (see "Patient education: Cesarean birth (The Basics)")

Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: C-section (cesarean delivery) (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Maternal care

Prophylaxis against hemorrhageOxytocin is administered for prophylaxis against hemorrhage, with many recommending a second uterotonic drug (eg, tranexamic acid). Protocols vary among institutions. (See 'Prophylaxis against hemorrhage' above.)

Analgesia – Multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia, including around-the-clock acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), is utilized in all patients, with the specific approach based on whether the patient received neuraxial (should receive neuroaxial opioids) or general anesthesia for surgery (table 3). (See 'Pain management' above.)

Bladder catheter – If inserted, removal of the bladder catheter as soon as possible postpartum (right after skin is closed) minimizes the risk of infection. (See 'Bladder catheter' above.)

Activity, diet – Early ambulation (when the effects of anesthesia have abated, as soon as within four hours of delivery) and oral intake (within six hours of delivery) are encouraged, as well as chewing gum three times a day. Patients may gradually increase aerobic training activities, depending on their level of discomfort and postpartum complications. Sexual activity may resume when the patient is ready. Heavy lifting should be avoided. Driving can be resumed when the patient is not taking opioids or sedatives and has no pain/mobility issues that would interfere with safe driving. (See 'Early ambulation' above and 'Exercise' above and 'Early oral food intake and gum chewing' above and 'Sexual activity' above and 'Lifting' above and 'Driving' above.)

The effectiveness of postpartum Kegel pelvic floor muscle exercises for prevention or treatment of incontinence is unclear, but such exercises can be started when contracting the pelvic floor is not painful. (See 'Exercise' above.)

Wound dressings – Wound dressings may be removed at 6 hours and certainly within 24 hours of application, and patients may shower within 48 hours of completion of surgery. (See 'Wound care' above.)

Laboratory tests – Routine postoperative hemoglobin testing is unnecessary in asymptomatic patients without preoperative anemia or excessive bleeding at delivery, as the information does not lead to improved outcomes. (See 'Maternal monitoring' above.)

Skin-to skin contact and breastfeeding – Ideally, skin-to skin contact with the newborn and breastfeeding are initiated in the delivery room. The usual drugs/procedures associated with cesarean birth are not a contraindication. (See 'Skin-to-skin contact' above and 'Breastfeeding' above.)

Complications – The frequency of short-term complications after cesarean birth is: ileus (10 to 20 percent), endometritis (6 to 11 percent), wound complications (1 to 2 percent), hemorrhage requiring transfusion (2 to 4 percent), surgical injury (0.2 to 0.5 percent), and thromboembolism (240 per 100,000 cesarean births). (See 'Complications' above.)

Newborn issues – Neonatal risks include iatrogenic prematurity, respiratory problems, and birth injury. (See 'Fetal and neonatal risks' above.)

Long-term risks

The major long-term risks of cesarean birth are abnormal placentation (previa, accreta spectrum) and uterine rupture during a trial of labor in future pregnancies (see 'Abnormal placentation' above and 'Uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy' above). The risk of abnormal placentation increases with an increasing number of cesarean births.

The rate of bowel obstruction after cesarean birth ranges from 0.5 to 9 per 1000 cesarean births, with the highest risk in patients who have undergone multiple cesarean births. (See 'Adhesions and bowel obstruction' above.)

Long-term abdominal scar complications include numbness, pain, and endometriosis. Uterine scar complications include cesarean scar pregnancy and postmenstrual spotting. (See 'Scar complications' above.)

Cesarean birth does not appear to be an independent risk factor for future unexplained stillbirth or subfertility. (See 'Unexplained stillbirth' above and 'Subfertility' above.)

  1. Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:523.e1.
  2. Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, et al. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:533.
  3. Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221:247.e1.
  4. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 750: Perioperative Pathways: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132:e120.
  5. Bollag L, Lim G, Sultan P, et al. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:1362.
  6. Corso E, Hind D, Beever D, et al. Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella review of systematic reviews. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:91.
  7. Meng X, Chen K, Yang C, et al. The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:694385.
  8. Sultan P, Sharawi N, Blake L, et al. Impact of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery on maternal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2021; 40:100935.
  9. Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11:CD003519.
  10. Karimi FZ, Sadeghi R, Maleki-Saghooni N, Khadivzadeh T. The effect of mother-infant skin to skin contact on success and duration of first breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 58:1.
  11. Mhyre JM, DʼOria R, Hameed AB, et al. The maternal early warning criteria: A proposal from the national partnership for maternal safety. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124:782.
  12. Friedman AM. Maternal early warning systems. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2015; 42:289.
  13. Singh A, Guleria K, Vaid NB, Jain S. Evaluation of maternal early obstetric warning system (MEOWS chart) as a predictor of obstetric morbidity: a prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 207:11.
  14. Pencole L, Peyronnet V, Mandelbrot L, Lepercq J. Risk factors of relaparotomy for intra-abdominal hemorrhage after cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 260:118.
  15. Horowitz E, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Routine hemoglobin testing following an elective Cesarean section: Is it necessary? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 14:223.
  16. Api O, Unal O, Api M, et al. Do asymptomatic patients require routine hemoglobin testing following uneventful, unplanned cesarean sections? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281:195.
  17. Di Mascio D, Caruso G, Prata G, et al. The efficacy of abdominal binders in reducing postoperative pain and distress after cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 262:73.
  18. Ossola P, Mascioli F, Coletta D, et al. Evidence on postoperative abdominal binding: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgeon 2021; 19:244.
  19. Borges NC, de Deus JM, Guimarães RA, et al. The incidence of chronic pain following Cesarean section and associated risk factors: A cohort of women followed up for three months. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0238634.
  20. Horowitz E, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, et al. Urine culture at removal of indwelling catheter after cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 85:276.
  21. Griffiths R, Fernandez R. Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; :CD004011.
  22. Hou D, Jia Y, Han A, et al. Effect of urinary catheter removal at different times after caesarean section: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 280:160.
  23. Marschall J, Carpenter CR, Fowler S, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for urinary tract infections after removal of urinary catheter: meta-analysis. BMJ 2013; 346:f3147.
  24. Sahin E, Terzioglu F. The Effect of Gum Chewing, Early Oral Hydration, and Early Mobilization on Intestinal Motility After Cesarean Birth. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2015; 12:380.
  25. Ganer Herman H, Kleiner I, Tairy D, et al. Effect of Digital Step Counter Feedback on Mobility After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135:1345.
  26. Hsu YY, Hung HY, Chang SC, Chang YJ. Early oral intake and gastrointestinal function after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:1327.
  27. Huang H, Wang H, He M. Early oral feeding compared with delayed oral feeding after cesarean section: a meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29:423.
  28. Wen Z, Shen M, Wu C, et al. Chewing gum for intestinal function recovery after caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:105.
  29. Ciardulli A, Saccone G, Di Mascio D, et al. Chewing gum improves postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31:1924.
  30. Weir LF, Nygaard IE, Wilken J, et al. Postoperative activity restrictions: Any evidence? Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:305.
  31. Gerten KA, Richter HE, Wheeler TL 2nd, et al. Intraabdominal pressure changes associated with lifting: Implications for postoperative activity restrictions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198:306.e1.
  32. Minig L, Trimble EL, Sarsotti C, et al. Building the evidence base for postoperative and postpartum advice. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:892.
  33. Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci 2004; 9:283.
  34. Woodley SJ, Lawrenson P, Boyle R, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 5:CD007471.
  35. Sigurdardottir T, Steingrimsdottir T, Geirsson RT, et al. Can postpartum pelvic floor muscle training reduce urinary and anal incontinence?: An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:247.e1.
  36. Von Bargen E, Haviland MJ, Chang OH, et al. Evaluation of Postpartum Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy on Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2021; 27:315.
  37. Toon CD, Ramamoorthy R, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD010259.
  38. Peleg D, Eberstark E, Warsof SL, et al. Early wound dressing removal after scheduled cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:388.e1.
  39. Cherry SB, Vasko M. Proper Surgical Dressing Removal Technique in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134:753.
  40. Toon CD, Sinha S, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Early versus delayed post-operative bathing or showering to prevent wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; :CD010075.
  41. McDonald EA, Brown SJ. Does method of birth make a difference to when women resume sex after childbirth? BJOG 2013; 120:823.
  42. Armson BA. Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative? CMAJ 2007; 176:475.
  43. Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, et al. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:669.
  44. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:917.
  45. Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Butwick AJ, et al. Morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in the United States: Is placenta accreta an increasingly important contributor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213:384.e1.
  46. Glance LG, Dick AW, Glantz JC, et al. Rates of major obstetrical complications vary almost fivefold among US hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33:1330.
  47. Hammad IA, Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Abuhamad AZ. Peripartum complications with cesarean delivery: A review of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network publications. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27:463.
  48. Carter EB, Temming LA, Fowler S, et al. Evidence-Based Bundles and Cesarean Delivery Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130:735.
  49. Temming LA, Raghuraman N, Carter EB, et al. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217:449.e1.
  50. Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29:477.
  51. Ketcheson F, Woolcott C, Allen V, Langley JM. Risk factors for surgical site infection following cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ Open 2017; 5:E546.
  52. Martens MG, Kolrud BL, Faro S, et al. Development of wound infection or separation after cesarean delivery. Prospective evaluation of 2,431 cases. J Reprod Med 1995; 40:171.
  53. Roberts S, Maccato M, Faro S, Pinell P. The microbiology of post-cesarean wound morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81:383.
  54. Sarsam SE, Elliott JP, Lam GK. Management of wound complications from cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60:462.
  55. Ueland K. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. VII. Intrapartum blood volume changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126:671.
  56. Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, et al. Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85:1448.
  57. Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA. Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:519.e1.
  58. Oliphant SS, Bochenska K, Tolge ME, et al. Maternal lower urinary tract injury at the time of Cesarean delivery. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25:1709.
  59. Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, et al. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105:156.
  60. Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N, et al. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1307.
  61. Blondon M, Casini A, Hoppe KK, et al. Risks of Venous Thromboembolism After Cesarean Sections: A Meta-Analysis. Chest 2016; 150:572.
  62. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:36.e1.
  63. Kallianidis AF, Schutte JM, van Roosmalen J, et al. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 229:148.
  64. Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2019; 393:1973.
  65. LaRosa JA, Saywell RM Jr, Zollinger TW, et al. The incidence of adynamic ileus in postcesarean patients. Patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular analgesia. J Reprod Med 1993; 38:293.
  66. Xu H, Ding Y, Ma Y, et al. Cesarean section and risk of postpartum depression: A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2017; 97:118.
  67. Clement S. Psychological aspects of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 15:109.
  68. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth J, et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:885.
  69. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97:439.
  70. Gerten KA, Coonrod DV, Bay RC, Chambliss LR. Cesarean delivery and respiratory distress syndrome: Does labor make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193:1061.
  71. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. www.rcog.org.uk (Accessed on January 20, 2012).
  72. Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:262.e1.
  73. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth(1). Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97:765.
  74. Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:771.
  75. Yang Q, Wen SW, Oppenheimer L, et al. Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta praevia and placental abruption in second pregnancy. BJOG 2007; 114:609.
  76. Jackson S, Fleege L, Fridman M, et al. Morbidity following primary cesarean delivery in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:139.e1.
  77. Odibo AO, Cahill AG, Stamilio DM, et al. Predicting placental abruption and previa in women with a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24:299.
  78. Antila-Långsjö RM, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala HS, et al. Cesarean scar defect: a prospective study on risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:458.e1.
  79. Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: Systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43:372.
  80. Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, et al. A population-based cohort study of the effect of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1320.
  81. Nezhat C, Falik R, Li A. Surgical management of niche, isthmocele, uteroperitoneal fistula, or cesarean scar defect: a critical rebirth in the medical literature. Fertil Steril 2017; 107:69.
  82. Klein Meuleman SJM, Murji A, van den Bosch T, et al. Definition and Criteria for Diagnosing Cesarean Scar Disorder. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e235321.
  83. O'Neill SM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, et al. Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013; 120:671.
  84. Huikeshoven FJ, Dukel L. The bikini incision: Nice, but not without painful complications. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998; 142:1481.
  85. Tosun K, Schäfer G, Leonhartsberger N, et al. Treatment of severe bilateral nerve pain after Pfannenstiel incision. Urology 2006; 67:623.e5.
  86. Stulz P, Pfeiffer KM. Peripheral nerve injuries resulting from common surgical procedures in the lower portion of the abdomen. Arch Surg 1982; 117:324.
  87. Sippo WC, Burghardt A, Gomez AC. Nerve entrapment after Pfannenstiel incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157:420.
  88. Loos MJ, Scheltinga MR, Mulders LG, Roumen RM. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:839.
  89. Zhang P, Sun Y, Zhang C, et al. Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature review. BMC Womens Health 2019; 19:14.
  90. Gunes M, Kayikcioglu F, Ozturkoglu E, Haberal A. Incisional endometriosis after cesarean section, episiotomy and other gynecologic procedures. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005; 31:471.
  91. Blanco RG, Parithivel VS, Shah AK, et al. Abdominal wall endometriomas. Am J Surg 2003; 185:596.
  92. Larsson C, Djuvfelt E, Lindam A, et al. Surgical complications after caesarean section: A population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258222.
  93. Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, et al. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201:56.e1.
  94. Soltan MH, Al Nuaim L, Khashoggi T, et al. Sequelae of repeat cesarean sections. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996; 52:127.
  95. Makoha FW, Felimban HM, Fathuddien MA, et al. Multiple cesarean section morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87:227.
  96. Morales KJ, Gordon MC, Bates GW Jr. Postcesarean delivery adhesions associated with delayed delivery of infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:461.e1.
  97. Uygur D, Gun O, Kelekci S, et al. Multiple repeat caesarean section: Is it safe? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 119:171.
  98. Hesselman S, Högberg U, Råssjö EB, et al. Abdominal adhesions in gynaecologic surgery after caesarean section: a longitudinal population-based register study. BJOG 2018; 125:597.
  99. Andolf E, Thorsell M, Källén K. Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: A nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203:406.e1.
  100. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1226.
  101. Al-Sunaidi M, Tulandi T. Adhesion-related bowel obstruction after hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1162.
  102. Abenhaim HA, Tulandi T, Wilchesky M, et al. Effect of Cesarean Delivery on Long-term Risk of Small Bowel Obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131:354.
  103. Eijsink JJ, van der Leeuw-Harmsen L, van der Linden PJ. Pregnancy after caesarean section: Fewer or later? Hum Reprod 2008; 23:543.
  104. CORONIS collaborative group, Abalos E, Addo V, et al. Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 388:62.
  105. Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J, ALSPAC Study Team. The relationship between Caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:1914.
  106. Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP, et al. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:1943.
  107. Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2018; 15:e1002494.
  108. Smith GC, Wood AM, Pell JP, Dobbie R. First cesarean birth and subsequent fertility. Fertil Steril 2006; 85:90.
  109. Tollånes MC, Melve KK, Irgens LM, Skjaerven R. Reduced fertility after cesarean delivery: A maternal choice. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:1256.
  110. Moraitis AA, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, et al. Previous caesarean delivery and the risk of unexplained stillbirth: Retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis. BJOG 2015; 122:1467.
  111. Bahtiyar MO, Julien S, Robinson JN, et al. Prior cesarean delivery is not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy: Analysis of U.S. perinatal mortality data, 1995-1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195:1373.
  112. Zhang Y, Zhou J, Ma Y, et al. Mode of delivery and preterm birth in subsequent births: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0213784.
  113. Eriksson C, Jonsson M, Högberg U, Hesselman S. Fetal station at caesarean section and risk of subsequent preterm birth - A cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 275:18.
  114. Rutayisire E, Huang K, Liu Y, Tao F. The mode of delivery affects the diversity and colonization pattern of the gut microbiota during the first year of infants' life: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16:86.
  115. Sakwinska O, Foata F, Berger B, et al. Does the maternal vaginal microbiota play a role in seeding the microbiota of neonatal gut and nose? Benef Microbes 2017; 8:763.
  116. Moore HC, de Klerk N, Holt P, et al. Hospitalisation for bronchiolitis in infants is more common after elective caesarean delivery. Arch Dis Child 2012; 97:410.
  117. Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, et al. Planned cesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA 2015; 314:2271.
  118. Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, et al. Planned repeat cesarean section at term and adverse childhood health outcomes: A record-linkage study. PLoS Med 2016; 13:e1001973.
  119. Bager P, Wohlfahrt J, Westergaard T. Caesarean delivery and risk of atopy and allergic disease: Meta-analyses. Clin Exp Allergy 2008; 38:634.
  120. Mitselou N, Hallberg J, Stephansson O, et al. Cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and risk of food allergy: Nationwide Swedish cohort study of more than 1 million children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 142:1510.
  121. Li HT, Zhou YB, Liu JM. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond) 2013; 37:893.
  122. Darmasseelane K, Hyde MJ, Santhakumaran S, et al. Mode of delivery and offspring body mass index, overweight and obesity in adult life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e87896.
  123. Miller JE, Goldacre R, Moore HC, et al. Mode of birth and risk of infection-related hospitalisation in childhood: A population cohort study of 7.17 million births from 4 high-income countries. PLoS Med 2020; 17:e1003429.
  124. Liu Y, Li HT, Zhou SJ, et al. Effects of vaginal seeding on gut microbiota, body mass index, and allergy risks in infants born through cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:100793.
  125. Committee Opinion No. 725 Summary: Vaginal Seeding. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130:1178. Reaffirmed 2022.
  126. Haahr T, Glavind J, Axelsson P, et al. Vaginal seeding or vaginal microbial transfer from the mother to the caesarean-born neonate: a commentary regarding clinical management. BJOG 2018; 125:533.
  127. Dolt D, O'Leary ST, Aucott SW. AAP COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. Risks of Infectious Diseases in Newborns Exposed to Alternative Perinatal Practices. Pediatrics e2021055554. Susan W. Aucott, MD, FAAP; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/doi/10.1542/peds.2021-055554/184545/Risks-of-Infectious-Diseases-in-Newborns-Exposed (Accessed on January 26, 2022).
  128. Zhang T, Sidorchuk A, Sevilla-Cermeño L, et al. Association of Cesarean Delivery With Risk of Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Disorders in the Offspring: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1910236.
  129. Zhang T, Brander G, Mantel Ä, et al. Assessment of Cesarean Delivery and Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Disorders in the Children of a Population-Based Swedish Birth Cohort. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e210837.
Topic 4459 Version 103.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟