ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Prune-belly syndrome

Prune-belly syndrome
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Oct 09, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Prune-belly syndrome (PBS), also known as Eagle-Barrett syndrome, is a congenital disorder defined by a characteristic clinical triad (picture 1):

Abdominal muscle deficiency

Severe urinary tract abnormalities

Bilateral cryptorchidism in males

The term "prune belly" reflects the characteristic wrinkled appearance of the abdominal wall in the newborn due to the complete or partially complete absence of abdominal wall muscles. In adolescent and adult life, the abdomen often assumes a smooth "pot belly" appearance. Contrary to this definition, PBS is in fact a multisystem disease, with patients displaying concomitant cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal anomalies in varying degree.

PBS, including its pathology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prognosis, will be reviewed here.

EPIDEMIOLOGY — The reported incidence of PBS is between 2 and 4 cases per 100,000 births, as illustrated by the following:

In a report based on data from the Kids' Inpatient Database from 2002, 2003, and 2006, the incidence of PBS in the United States was approximately 3.8 cases per 100,000 live births [1]. In this cohort, approximately 50 percent of affected patients were White, 30 percent Black, and 10 percent Hispanic.

In the Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations from 1993 to 2015, 31 cases of PBS were identified, corresponding to a total prevalence of 2.28 per 100,000 pregnancies. In 16 of these 31 cases, pregnancy was electively terminated due to PBS and 15 were live births [2].

PBS primarily occurs in males, although there are rare case reports of this disorder in females [1,3]. Interestingly, gonadal abnormalities are not observed in affected females [4].

PATHOGENESIS

Genetics – The genetic basis of PBS remains unknown. A recessive X-linked defect is suggested by the predominance of affected males. However, this mode of inheritance is precluded by two observations:

Although rare, the disorder can occur in females [3]

(Untreated) affected males suffer from azoospermia

PBS has also occurred in association with other chromosomal abnormalities, including trisomy 13, 18, and 21 [5], and a report of large deletion in the long arm of chromosome 6 in a male fetus [6].

Further evidence for a genetic basis of PBS includes a report of two cases of concordant PBS in monozygotic twins [7] and a report of two nontwin brothers [8].

Isolated abdominal wall muscular hypoplasia, without evidence of urinary tract or kidney pathology, has also been described in a family with apparent autosomal dominant or mitochondrial inheritance [9].

Mesenchymal developmental defect – It has been suggested that the underlying defect in PBS is abnormal mesoderm development [10,11]. In particular, a primary defect in the intermediate and lateral plate mesoderm would affect embryogenesis of the musculature of the abdominal wall, the mesonephric and paramesonephric ducts, and the urinary organs [11].

The underlying mesenchymal defect may be caused by one of the following proposed mechanisms:

Deletion of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HFN1B) gene on chromosome 17q12 [12-14] – HFN1B is a transcription factor that regulates gene expression and plays a crucial role in embryonic development as it is essential for visceral endoderm specification [15]. HFN1B is expressed in the epithelial cells of kidney, pancreas, liver, genital tract, and intestinal tract [16]. Variants of the HFN1B may lead to abnormal development of the kidneys and genital tract; however, it does not explain all the findings of PBS, such as the lack of abdominal musculature. In a study of 32 patients with PBS (30 males and 2 females), only one missense variant, which was functionally normal, was detected [17].

Hemizygous missense mutations in the X-linked filamin A gene – Whole-exome sequencing identified three hemizygous missense point variants in the X-chromosome gene filamin A (FLNA) in two related cases and two unrelated sporadic individuals. FLNA is a regulatory actin-crosslinking protein that functions in smooth muscle cells as a mechanosensing molecular scaffold transmitting signals from the cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix. This is the first evidence for an X-linked cause of PBS in four affected males [18].

Pathogenic copy number variants – In a report of 34 PBS patients (30 male, 4 female), 17 novel pathogenic copy number variants were identified [19]. This included duplications at 4q22 overlapping the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1B (BMPR1B) gene, the intron of the stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) gene, the gene (NOG) that encodes noggin, and a large deletion including the myocardin (MYOCD) gene. All of these genes are involved in mesodermal, muscle, and urinary tract development and differentiation. Another copy number variant associated with PBS was described in chromosome 16p11.2 encompassing the SH2B1 gene [20].

Loss-of-function mutation of the CHRM3. In a case report, six brothers of a Turkish family with a prune-belly-like syndrome had inherited the same loss-of-function mutation of the CHRM3 from their unaffected parents. CHRM3 encodes the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 that, apart from its role in detrusor contractions, is present in developing renal epithelia and bladder muscle [14,21].

Other genes with mutations found in patients with either prune belly or an overlapping disease called megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome include ACTA2 (encodes alpha-smooth muscle actin), ACTG2 (encodes gamma 2 smooth muscle actin), MYH11 (encodes a smooth muscle heavy chain protein), and MYLK (encodes myosin light-chain kinase that modifies myosin chains in smooth muscle cells) [22].

Alternatively, some investigators have suggested that early urethral obstruction by a valve-like mechanism is the primary abnormality in PBS, which can then lead to the other clinical manifestations [23,24]. However, the observation that patients with congenital posterior urethral valves do not have the other features of PBS casts doubt on this hypothesis [11].

PATHOLOGY — Pathologic involvement of the kidneys, genitourinary tract, and other organ systems results in the variable clinical manifestations of PBS.

Kidneys — The major kidney abnormality in PBS is dysplasia that affects a variable portion of kidney tissue. The dysplasia is manifested by incomplete nephron differentiation and dilatation of tubules, which are lined by immature epithelial cells [25]. Tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and chronic lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates are present, and glomerulosclerosis is eventually seen. In addition, associated findings include reflux nephropathy and recurrent pyelonephritis, which may result in cortical scars.

Renal dysplastic changes may not be evident before 16 weeks gestation, as demonstrated by a case report from Japan [26]. In this report, a fetus was diagnosed with PBS by ultrasound at 12 weeks gestation with cystomegaly due to urethral obstruction. The pregnancy was terminated at 14 weeks gestation based on fetal urinary electrolyte and beta-2-microglobulin values that indicated a poor kidney prognosis. An autopsy demonstrated abdominal wall defects and severe urethral obstruction consistent with a diagnosis of PBS, but the kidneys were histologically normal without any evidence of dysplasia.

Urogenital tract — Abnormalities of the ureter, prostate, bladder, and testicles are commonly observed. These anomalies may be unilateral or bilateral, thereby resulting in varying degrees of kidney impairment due to vesicoureteral reflux and obstruction.

Ureters – The ureters are grossly elongated, dilated, and tortuous due to replacement of smooth muscle with fibrous tissue. Ureteral stenoses may occur due to kinking. Peristalsis is ineffective or lacking.

Bladder – The bladder is usually enlarged and nontrabeculated and has thickened walls (due to collagen deposits) with smooth muscle hypoplasia. The dome of the bladder is frequently capped by a diverticular remnant of the urachus. The trigone is barely discernible, and the ureteral ostia are lateralized (often with a golf hole-like appearance).

Contrary to a widely held belief that urinary obstruction is the cause of bladder distention, intraluminal storage and voiding pressures are abnormally low in patients with PBS. Significant residual urine volumes suggest the presence of defective bladder urodynamics [27].

Prostate – A hallmark of PBS in males is a markedly hypoplastic or dysplastic prostate, which leads to dilatation of the prostatic urethra. In occasional patients, a valve-like mechanism develops in the membranous part of the urethra and causes urinary obstruction [24]. This may lead to a pressure-induced dysplasia of the prostate [28].

Testicles – Bilateral undescended testes and an empty scrotum are regularly found in affected male patients. However, spermatogonia are not universally absent. The germ cells are markedly reduced in number, appear atypical, and may predispose to malignant tumors later in life [29,30]. It is presumed that the mechanical obstruction from megacystis and hydroureteronephrosis contributes to the maldescent of the testicles [31].

Abdominal wall musculature — A constant feature of PBS is partial aplasia or hypoplasia of the abdominal muscles (which may be unilateral or asymmetric), leading to the prune-belly appearance (picture 1). Electron microscopy of affected abdominal muscles reveals dystrophy with loss of coherence in the Z bands, clumping of glycogen granules, and mitochondrial abnormalities [32].

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

Clinical triad — PBS is composed of a characteristic clinical triad:

Abdominal muscle deficiency (picture 1), leading to the characteristic wrinkled appearance of the abdominal wall ("prune belly")

Severe kidney and urinary tract abnormalities

Bilateral cryptorchidism in males

The severity of renal dysplasia and urinary tract abnormalities along with the presence of pulmonary hypoplasia are the two principal characteristics that determine the eventual outcome among patients with PBS. These abnormalities may result in recurrent episodes of urinary tract infections, urosepsis, varying degrees of renal and respiratory insufficiency, and other manifestations of the disorder [33].

Abdomen — Prune-belly appearance (picture 1) is due to aplasia or hypoplasia of the abdominal muscles (which may be unilateral or asymmetric). Later in life, intraabdominal organs may prolapse and lead to a "pot-belly" appearance.

Other gastrointestinal malformations can occur and include [34]:

Malrotation of the midgut and persistence of the embryonic wide mesentery, resulting in cecum mobile, elongation of the colon, and volvulus. (See "Intestinal malrotation in children".)

Hindgut abnormalities, leading to anorectal malformations (eg, persistence of the embryonic cloaca, agenesis of rectum and anus, and congenital pouch colon).

Kidney — Approximately one-half of the patients surviving infancy will develop chronic kidney disease in childhood or adolescence [33]. Findings of bilaterally abnormal kidneys (as determined by ultrasound or renal scan), a serum creatinine concentration greater than 0.7 mg/dL (62 mcmol/L), and episodes of clinical pyelonephritis appear to predict the eventual development of chronic kidney disease [35]. Other patients with the least severe form of the syndrome experience either no or only mild impairment of kidney function.

The severity and timing of onset of kidney impairment may reflect the degree of renal dysplasia (see 'Kidneys' above). One study, for example, correlated histologic findings with the severity and onset of kidney dysfunction [25]. At autopsy, six of nine children who had died in infancy or as neonates had severe and diffuse renal dysplasia. By comparison, dysplastic changes were observed in less than 25 percent of the renal parenchyma in 10 surviving patients, all of whom had varying degrees of kidney dysfunction. Kidney failure in these patients was thought to be due to pyelonephritis and obstruction, not renal dysplasia.

Individuals with deformed appearance of the urinary tract on kidney ultrasonography and voiding cystourethrogram often have surprisingly good kidney function. Thus, radiologic techniques are not always reliable in assessing obstruction [36].

Data are limited regarding kidney failure in patients with PBS. Review of data from the European Society of Paediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry identified a cohort of 88 children with PBS who progressed to kidney failure [37]. Age at kidney replacement therapy (KRT) onset varied, with 15, 25, 22, and 26 patients starting KRT at <0.5 years, 0.5 to 5 years, 6 to 10 years, and ≥11 years, respectively. Initial KRT included peritoneal dialysis (n = 44), preemptive kidney transplantation (n = 29), and hemodialysis (n = 15).

Urogenital — Most patients have urologic abnormalities. This was illustrated in a review of 46 patients (44 boys and 2 girls) cared for at a tertiary center in the United States, which reported bilateral hydroureteronephrosis in 45 patients (98 percent) and vesicoureteral reflux in 34 cases (78 percent) [33].

In most affected males, bilateral undescended testes and an empty scrotum are typical findings. Male adolescent patients usually experience normal erections and orgasm, but retrograde ejaculation is frequent [38]. Owing to early orchiopexy, there are case reports of successful paternity by aspirated sperm retrieval and in vitro fertilization [39]. In addition, hypoplastic or dysplastic prostate leads to prostatic urethral dilation, which may cause urinary obstruction [24].

In a postpubertal cohort study of fifteen male patients with PBS, all of whom had orchiopexy at a mean age of 18 months, 14 patients had normal and orthotopic kidneys at a mean age of 19.2 years. In five of eight patients who had analysis of their semen, spermatozoa were detected, with motile sperm in four [40]. Two-thirds of the cohort had hypoplastic prostates and unilateral seminal vesicle absence.

Urinary tract infections, including recurrent episodes of cystitis and pyelonephritis, are common, occasionally resulting in urosepsis [33].

Pulmonary hypoplasia — Pulmonary hypoplasia is the most significant extra-urogenital complication in PBS. It is caused by oligohydramnios in the first one-half of gestation due to lack of sufficient urine production, which promotes mechanical compression of the fetus and inhibits thoracic expansion. Without amniotic fluid entering the airways, the lungs remain hypoplastic. In addition, thoracic cage deformities and paradoxical movement of the abdomen during respiration may predispose affected patients to mechanical restriction, thereby explaining their susceptibility to impaired cough mechanism, recurrent bronchitis and pneumonia, and respiratory depression following anesthesia [41].

Cases of congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations in patients with PBS have also been reported, suggesting a possible association between these two disorders [42]. (See "Congenital pulmonary airway malformation".)

Other manifestations — Other manifestations include:

Chronic constipation is a common feature of PBS [33,43]. (See "Functional constipation in infants, children, and adolescents: Clinical features and diagnosis".)

Impaired exercise tolerance in older children and adults due to paradoxical motion of the abdomen during respiration [41].

Poor growth occurs in up to one-third of cases [44].

Anorectal malformations have been described in children with PBS including imperforate anus [45], anorectal agenesis [46], or congenital pouch colon [47].

Splenic torsion may occur due to intestinal malrotation and wandering spleen [48].

Musculoskeletal anomalies are numerous and include clubfoot, dislocated hip, kyphoscoliosis, polydactyly, torticollis, and pectus excavatum [33,44]. Some of these abnormalities are deformations due to severe reduction of amniotic fluid (oligohydramnios). (See "Lower extremity positional deformations".)

Complex cardiac anomalies can occur rarely [49].

Imaging — Imaging by ultrasound is the preferred modality as it can identify the following findings:

Dilatation of urinary bladder and ureters (megacystis, megaureters)

Hydronephrosis with or without echodense kidney parenchyma

Polycystic or dysplastic kidneys

Hypoplastic lungs

Antenatal ultrasound imaging may identify any of the above findings as well as detect oligohydramnios and fetal ascites.

Magnetic resonance urography appears to be a promising technique for evaluation of the upper urinary tract in patients with PBS. In a retrospective series of 13 boys (median age 29.3 months, range 6 to 97 months), urologic abnormalities beyond hydroureteronephrosis were easily detected and included renal dysplasia, scarring, calyceal diverticula, and thickened bladder [50].

DIAGNOSIS — The diagnosis of PBS is made clinically with the identification of the characteristic clinical triad of abdominal muscle deficiency, severe kidney and urinary tract abnormalities, and bilateral cryptorchidism in males. The syndrome is most often recognized at birth or in early childhood by the peculiar appearance of the abdominal wall, cryptorchism in males, and identified urogenital abnormalities by ultrasound. PBS occasionally presents later in life as a rare cause of end-stage kidney failure in the adult [51,52].

Antenatal diagnosis may be made by routine ultrasonographic examination of the fetus between weeks 20 and 30 gestation. High-end vaginal sonography allows visualization of the kidneys and the urinary drainage system as early as 11 to 13 weeks gestation [53]. In some cases, it may be difficult to differentiate posterior urethral valves from PBS in utero as both may present with antenatal ultrasound findings of a dilated bladder and bilateral hydronephrosis. In the rare cases of in utero intervention, patients with PBS have a better prognosis than those with posterior urethral valves. (See "Clinical presentation and diagnosis of posterior urethral valves", section on 'Prenatal' and "Management of posterior urethral valves", section on 'Outcome'.)

MANAGEMENT

Antenatal management — Antenatal intervention may be required in severe cases of obstructive uropathy (ie, when midgestational oligohydramnios is present). In this setting, placement of a vesicoamniotic shunt may prevent an otherwise fatal neonatal course, due primarily to pulmonary hypoplasia [54-56]. (See "Fetal hydronephrosis: Etiology and prenatal management", section on 'Fetal surgery'.)

Postnatal management — The appropriate therapy of PBS in early childhood remains controversial. Severely affected patients require early surgery (supravesical diversion or primary reconstruction) to provide adequate urinary drainage and avoid recurrent infections [57]. In some patients, the insertions of a cystostomy button may facilitate bladder drainage and improve quality of life [58].

By comparison, others may reach adult life with only a minor degree of chronic kidney impairment, and, therefore, require only minimal early intervention. Furthermore, as the progression of the kidney impairment in childhood and adolescence is primarily due to recurrent pyelonephritis and reflux nephropathy, adequate antibiotic therapy including antibiotic prophylaxis and, in rare cases, surgical intervention may prevent or delay progression to kidney failure [25]. (See "Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and course of primary vesicoureteral reflux".)

Kidney failure

Transplantation — Kidney transplantation has been successfully performed in PBS and is the preferred treatment for kidney failure, either as preemptive therapy or following dialysis. Long-term outcome is excellent and is similar to other causes of kidney failure [37,59,60]. However, extensive pretransplant urologic tract preparation may be necessary to reduce the postvoid residual volume to a minimum [61,62].

There also may be rare complications of transplantation intrinsic to this syndrome, such as acute torsion of the transplant [63]. In some cases when the native bladder is unsuitable, successful drainage of the transplanted kidney into a urinary conduit or augmented bladder has been performed [64].

Dialysis — Maintenance hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis are equally effective in the management of kidney failure in PBS [65]. Children with PBS who are initially treated with peritoneal dialysis have similar complication rates as patients with other causes of kidney failure [37,63].

In the previously mentioned study from European Society of Paediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry, 8 of the 44 patients who started on peritoneal dialysis were switched to hemodialysis because of technical difficulties [37]. However, this was a similar rate as other patients with kidney failure due to obstructive uropathy and renal hypodysplasia. (See "Overview of kidney replacement therapy for children with chronic kidney disease" and "Chronic peritoneal dialysis in children" and "Hemodialysis for children with chronic kidney disease".)

Other genitourinary interventions — Additional therapeutic interventions may also be required for other manifestations of PBS. These include:

Ureteral reimplantation for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux or patients who fail medical management for vesicoureteral reflux. (See "Management of vesicoureteral reflux".)

Reduction cystoplasty may help improve voiding and minimize infection, although bladder capacity is not reduced and voiding dynamics are not improved [66]. To assure sufficient bladder drainage, a cutaneous vesicostomy or appendicovesicostomy (Mitrofanoff procedure) may be necessary.

Urethrotomy may often improve bladder emptying, even if there is no anatomical obstruction ("functional obstruction") [67].

The intraabdominal testes in males have been successfully brought to the scrotum laparoscopically or by a Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy [68,69]. This procedure should not be delayed until adolescence. In a retrospective series of 41 male adults with PBS who had undergone Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy in childhood, 38 (93 percent) achieved sufficient testicular function to induce puberty and maintain satisfactory sexual function in adult life [70]. (See "Undescended testes (cryptorchidism) in children: Management", section on 'Timing of surgery'.)

Abdominal wall reconstruction — The abdominal wall may be reconstructed for cosmetic and psychosocial reasons by excision of the redundant skin while preserving the umbilicus [71-73]. In addition, this may improve bladder function, with reduction of postvoid residual urine volume, as well as bowel function and facilitate the development of more normalized walking and breathing [74].

In those who do not require a concurrent intraabdominal procedure, an abdominoplasty can be performed by an extraperitoneal plication of fascial folds, obviating the need for a fascial incision and/or entrance into the peritoneal cavity; this technique produces cosmetically excellent results with a decreased recovery time [75]. This reconstruction may be done by laparoscopy that potentially decreases morbidity and complications associated with an open surgical procedure [76].

To improve the functional status of the abdominal wall, muscle transposition from the thigh musculature has been performed, which may prevent the loss of spinal stability and development of kyphoscoliosis [77,78].

Timing of urinary tract reconstruction and abdominoplasty remains a matter of discussion. Early simultaneous correction of PBS anomalies seems advisable to preserve kidney function and improve quality of life [33,79,80].

Spinal procedures — In rare cases of marked scoliotic spine deformities, orthopedic surgery is warranted to correct the underlying defect [81].

PROGNOSIS

Mortality — Patients with PBS have had a generally poor prognosis. In older reports, 20 percent of affected children were said to be stillborn and 50 percent did not survive to the age of two years [82]. However, early diagnosis and appropriate therapy have led to improved survival. In a subsequent series of 50 patients, the overall mortality was 32 percent, with the majority of deaths confined to the perinatal period [83].

Paternity — Although affected untreated males suffer from azoospermia, and thus are infertile by definition, viable spermatozoa may be found in testes after orchiopexy. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and transfer of a single expanded blastocyst, performed three times in an otherwise infertile couple, has led to three singleton pregnancies [84]. Outcomes included nonviable fetus (gestational age 18 weeks) and two healthy male infants, one of whom was born prematurely. Sperm retrieval may be done intraoperatively by microdissection testicular sperm extraction for cryopreservation and in vitro fertilization [85].

Pregnancy — Women's reproductive systems are rarely affected by PBS, and little is known regarding reproductive potential. In one case report, a 25-year-old female patient diagnosed with (incomplete) PBS delivered a healthy child after an uneventful pregnancy [86]. Labor and delivery were, however, complicated by a prolonged second stage of labor and need for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Introduction – Prune-belly syndrome (PBS), also known as Eagle-Barrett syndrome, is a congenital disorder defined by a characteristic clinical triad that includes abdominal muscle deficiency, severe urinary tract abnormalities, and bilateral cryptorchidism in males (picture 1).

Epidemiology – The reported incidence is between 2 and 4 cases per 100,000 births. Males are primarily affected, although there are rare cases in females. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)

Pathogenesis – The pathogenesis of PBS remains unknown. It is thought to be due to a genetic defect in mesenchymal development. (See 'Pathogenesis' above.)

Kidney pathology – The severity of kidney pathology is the primary factor that affects the clinical manifestations of PBS. Dysplasia is the main kidney abnormality of PBS, and it is manifested by incomplete nephron differentiation and dilatation of the tubules. Approximately one-half of patients have severe dysplasia, develop kidney failure, and require kidney replacement therapy (KRT). (See 'Kidney' above.)

Clinical manifestations

The clinical triad that defines PBS includes include prune-belly appearance due to aplasia or hypoplasia of the abdominal muscles, impaired kidney function, and cryptorchidism in males. (See 'Clinical manifestations' above.)

Pulmonary hypoplasia due to severe oligohydramnios resulting in maldevelopment of the lungs is the most severe finding associated with PBS.

Other findings include gastrointestinal malformations (eg, malrotation of the midgut or anorectal malformations) and skeletal abnormalities (eg, clubfoot). (See 'Clinical manifestations' above.)

Diagnosis – The diagnosis of PBS is made clinically with the identification of the characteristic features of abdominal muscle deficiency, severe urinary tract abnormalities, and bilateral cryptorchidism in males. The diagnosis may be made by antenatal ultrasonographic examination between weeks 20 and 30 gestation, or at birth or in early childhood by clinical recognition of the syndrome. (See 'Diagnosis' above.)

Management – The management of PBS depends on the severity of the clinical findings:

In rare cases, antenatal intervention has been performed to reduce the risk and severity of pulmonary hypoplasia. (See 'Antenatal management' above.)

Postnatal surgical intervention may be needed to provide adequate urinary drainage and avoid urinary tract infections in some patients. (See 'Postnatal management' above.)

-Kidney failure is managed with dialysis or kidney transplantation. (See 'Kidney failure' above.)

-Other interventions include additional genitourinary procedures to improve bladder control and capacity, orchiopexy, abdominal wall reconstruction, and, in rare cases, orthopedic surgery for skeletal deformities.

Prognosis – Although the survival rate has improved for PBS with earlier diagnosis and intervention, the mortality rate still remains at approximately 30 percent, with the majority of deaths occurring in the perinatal period due to pulmonary insufficiency. (See 'Prognosis' above.)

  1. Routh JC, Huang L, Retik AB, Nelson CP. Contemporary epidemiology and characterization of newborn males with prune belly syndrome. Urology 2010; 76:44.
  2. Pakkasjärvi N, Syvänen J, Tauriainen A, et al. Prune belly syndrome in Finland - A population-based study on current epidemiology and hospital admissions. J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17:702.e1.
  3. Reinberg Y, Shapiro E, Manivel JC, et al. Prune belly syndrome in females: a triad of abdominal musculature deficiency and anomalies of the urinary and genital systems. J Pediatr 1991; 118:395.
  4. Lloyd JC, Wiener JS, Gargollo PC, et al. Contemporary epidemiological trends in complex congenital genitourinary anomalies. J Urol 2013; 190:1590.
  5. Amacker EA, Grass FS, Hickey DE, Hisley JC. An association of prune belly anomaly with trisomy 21. Am J Med Genet 1986; 23:919.
  6. Fryns JP, Vandenberghe K, Van den Berghe H. Prune-belly anomaly and large interstitial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 6. Ann Genet 1991; 34:127.
  7. Balaji KC, Patil A, Townes PL, et al. Concordant prune belly syndrome in monozygotic twins. Urology 2000; 55:949.
  8. Ramasamy R, Haviland M, Woodard JR, Barone JG. Patterns of inheritance in familial prune belly syndrome. Urology 2005; 65:1227.
  9. Chan YC, Bird LM. Vertically transmitted hypoplasia of the abdominal wall musculature. Clin Dysmorphol 2004; 13:7.
  10. Straub E, Spranger J. Etiology and pathogenesis of the prune belly syndrome. Kidney Int 1981; 20:695.
  11. Stephens FD, Gupta D. Pathogenesis of the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1994; 152:2328.
  12. Murray PJ, Thomas K, Mulgrew CJ, et al. Whole gene deletion of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta gene in a patient with the prune-belly syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23:2412.
  13. Haeri S, Devers PL, Kaiser-Rogers KA, et al. Deletion of hepatocyte nuclear factor-1-beta in an infant with prune belly syndrome. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27:559.
  14. Woolf AS, Stuart HM, Newman WG. Genetics of human congenital urinary bladder disease. Pediatr Nephrol 2014; 29:353.
  15. Coffinier C, Thépot D, Babinet C, et al. Essential role for the homeoprotein vHNF1/HNF1beta in visceral endoderm differentiation. Development 1999; 126:4785.
  16. Coffinier C, Barra J, Babinet C, Yaniv M. Expression of the vHNF1/HNF1beta homeoprotein gene during mouse organogenesis. Mech Dev 1999; 89:211.
  17. Granberg CF, Harrison SM, Dajusta D, et al. Genetic basis of prune belly syndrome: screening for HNF1β gene. J Urol 2012; 187:272.
  18. Iqbal NS, Jascur TA, Harrison SM, et al. Prune belly syndrome in surviving males can be caused by Hemizygous missense mutations in the X-linked Filamin A gene. BMC Med Genet 2020; 21:38.
  19. Boghossian NS, Sicko RJ, Giannakou A, et al. Rare copy number variants identified in prune belly syndrome. Eur J Med Genet 2018; 61:145.
  20. Talluri S, Goedde MA, Rosenberg E, et al. Case Report: Novel Copy Number Variant 16p11.2 Duplication Associated With Prune Belly Syndrome. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:729932.
  21. Weber S, Thiele H, Mir S, et al. Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor M3 Mutation Causes Urinary Bladder Disease and a Prune-Belly-like Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2011; 89:668.
  22. Woolf AS, Lopes FM, Ranjzad P, Roberts NA. Congenital Disorders of the Human Urinary Tract: Recent Insights From Genetic and Molecular Studies. Front Pediatr 2019; 7:136.
  23. Moerman P, Fryns JP, Goddeeris P, Lauweryns JM. Pathogenesis of the prune-belly syndrome: a functional urethral obstruction caused by prostatic hypoplasia. Pediatrics 1984; 73:470.
  24. Hoagland MH, Hutchins GM. Obstructive lesions of the lower urinary tract in the prune belly syndrome. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1987; 111:154.
  25. Reinberg Y, Manivel JC, Pettinato G, Gonzalez R. Development of renal failure in children with the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1991; 145:1017.
  26. Shigeta M, Nagata M, Shimoyamada H, et al. Prune-belly syndrome diagnosed at 14 weeks' gestation with severe urethral obstruction but normal kidneys. Pediatr Nephrol 1999; 13:135.
  27. Kinahan TJ, Churchill BM, McLorie GA, et al. The efficiency of bladder emptying in the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1992; 148:600.
  28. Volmar KE, Fritsch MK, Perlman EJ, Hutchins GM. Patterns of congenital lower urinary tract obstructive uropathy: relation to abnormal prostate and bladder development and the prune belly syndrome. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2001; 4:467.
  29. Massad CA, Cohen MB, Kogan BA, Beckstead JH. Morphology and histochemistry of infant testes in the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1991; 146:1598.
  30. Humphrey PA, Shuch B. Seminoma in Cryptorchid Testis in Prune Belly Syndrome. J Urol 2015; 194:799.
  31. Zugor V, Schott GE, Labanaris AP. The Prune Belly syndrome: urological aspects and long-term outcomes of a rare disease. Pediatr Rep 2012; 4:e20.
  32. Mininberg DT, Montoya F, Okada K, et al. Subcellular muscle studies in the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1973; 109:524.
  33. Seidel NE, Arlen AM, Smith EA, Kirsch AJ. Clinical manifestations and management of prune-belly syndrome in a large contemporary pediatric population. Urology 2015; 85:211.
  34. Wright JR Jr, Barth RF, Neff JC, et al. Gastrointestinal malformations associated with prune belly syndrome: three cases and a review of the literature. Pediatr Pathol 1986; 5:421.
  35. Noh PH, Cooper CS, Winkler AC, et al. Prognostic factors for long-term renal function in boys with the prune-belly syndrome. J Urol 1999; 162:1399.
  36. Woodhouse CR, Kellett MJ, Williams DI. Minimal surgical interference in the prune belly syndrome. Br J Urol 1979; 51:475.
  37. Yalcinkaya F, Bonthuis M, Erdogan BD, et al. Outcomes of renal replacement therapy in boys with prune belly syndrome: findings from the ESPN/ERA-EDTA Registry. Pediatr Nephrol 2018; 33:117.
  38. Woodhouse CR, Snyder HM 3rd. Testicular and sexual function in adults with prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1985; 133:607.
  39. Kolettis PN, Ross JH, Kay R, Thomas AJ Jr. Sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with prune-belly syndrome. Fertil Steril 1999; 72:948.
  40. Lopes RI, Tavares A, Dénes FT, Cocuzza M. Gonadal Function and Reproductive System Anatomy in Postpubertal Prune-Belly Syndrome Patients. Urology 2020; 145:292.
  41. Ewig JM, Griscom NT, Wohl ME. The effect of the absence of abdominal muscles on pulmonary function and exercise. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:1314.
  42. Armstrong R, Fryer A, Pisipati S, Jesudason E. Evaluating the association between congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung and abdominal wall laxity. Clin Dysmorphol 2007; 16:77.
  43. Grimsby GM, Harrison SM, Granberg CF, et al. Impact and frequency of extra-genitourinary manifestations of prune belly syndrome. J Pediatr Urol 2015; 11:280.e1.
  44. Geary DF, MacLusky IB, Churchill BM, McLorie G. A broader spectrum of abnormalities in the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1986; 135:324.
  45. Morgan CL Jr, Grossman H, Novak R. Imperforate anus and colon calcification in association with the prune belly syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 1978; 7:19.
  46. Walker J, Prokurat AI, Irving IM. Prune belly syndrome associated with exomphalos and anorectal agenesis. J Pediatr Surg 1987; 22:215.
  47. Bangroo AK, Tiwari S, Khetri R, Sahni M. Congenital pouch colon with prune belly syndrome and megalourethra. Pediatr Surg Int 2005; 21:474.
  48. Tran S, Grossman E, Barsness KA. Prune belly syndrome, splenic torsion, and malrotation: a case report. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48:e41.
  49. Doğan R, Yilmaz M, Duman U U, Ozkutlu S. Bidirectional Glenn shunt in an infant with prune-belly syndrome. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 49:378.
  50. Garcia-Roig ML, Grattan-Smith JD, Arlen AM, et al. Detailed evaluation of the upper urinary tract in patients with prune belly syndrome using magnetic resonance urography. J Pediatr Urol 2016; 12:122.e1.
  51. Wallner M, Kramar R. Detection of prune-belly syndrome in a 35-year-old man: a rare cause of end-stage renal failure in the adult. Am J Nephrol 1990; 10:413.
  52. Brown PS Jr, Hartz RS, Hines JR. Prune belly syndrome in adult man. Urology 1993; 41:199.
  53. Yamamoto H, Nishikawa S, Hayashi T, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of prune belly syndrome at 11 weeks of gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2001; 27:37.
  54. Leeners B, Sauer I, Schefels J, et al. Prune-belly syndrome: therapeutic options including in utero placement of a vesicoamniotic shunt. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28:500.
  55. Freedman AL, Johnson MP, Smith CA, et al. Long-term outcome in children after antenatal intervention for obstructive uropathies. Lancet 1999; 354:374.
  56. Biard JM, Johnson MP, Carr MC, et al. Long-term outcomes in children treated by prenatal vesicoamniotic shunting for lower urinary tract obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106:503.
  57. Woodard JR, Zucker I. Current management of the dilated urinary tract in prune belly syndrome. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17:407.
  58. Milliken I, Munro NP, Subramaniam R. Cystostomy button for bladder drainage in children. J Urol 2007; 178:2604.
  59. Fontaine E, Salomon L, Gagnadoux MF, et al. Long-term results of renal transplantation in children with the prune-belly syndrome. J Urol 1997; 158:892.
  60. Fusaro F, Zanon GF, Ferreli AM, et al. Renal transplantation in prune-belly syndrome. Transpl Int 2004; 17:549.
  61. Kamel MH, Thomas AA, Al-Mufarrej FM, et al. Deceased-donor kidney transplantation in prune belly syndrome. Urology 2007; 69:666.
  62. Djakovic N, Wagener N, Adams J, et al. Intestinal reconstruction of the lower urinary tract as a prerequisite for renal transplantation. BJU Int 2009; 103:1555.
  63. Abbitt PL, Chevalier RL, Rodgers BM, Howards SS. Acute torsion of a renal transplant: cause of organ loss. Pediatr Nephrol 1990; 4:174.
  64. Hatch DA, Koyle MA, Baskin LS, et al. Kidney transplantation in children with urinary diversion or bladder augmentation. J Urol 2001; 165:2265.
  65. Crompton CH, Balfe JW, Khoury A. Peritoneal dialysis in the prune belly syndrome. Perit Dial Int 1994; 14:17.
  66. Bukowski TP, Perlmutter AD. Reduction cystoplasty in the prune belly syndrome: a long-term followup. J Urol 1994; 152:2113.
  67. Woodhouse CR, Neild GH. A child with recurrent urine infections and undescended testes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1995; 10:711.
  68. Docimo SG, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic orchidopexy in the prune belly syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Urology 1995; 45:679.
  69. Redman JF, Mooney DK. Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy in a patient with prune belly syndrome and segmental atretic vas deferens. Urology 1993; 41:130.
  70. Patil KK, Duffy PG, Woodhouse CR, Ransley PG. Long-term outcome of Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy in boys with prune-belly syndrome. J Urol 2004; 171:1666.
  71. Monfort G, Guys JM, Bocciardi A, et al. A novel technique for reconstruction of the abdominal wall in the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1991; 146:639.
  72. Dénes FT, Lopes RI, Oliveira LM, et al. Modified abdominoplasty for patients with the Prune Belly syndrome. Urology 2014; 83:451.
  73. Smith EA, Srinivasan A, Scherz HC, et al. Abdominoplasty in prune belly syndrome: Modifications in Monfort technique to address variable patterns of abdominal wall weakness. J Pediatr Urol 2017; 13:502.e1.
  74. Fernández-Bautista B, Angulo JM, Burgos L, et al. Surgical approach to prune-belly syndrome: A review of our series and novel surgical technique. J Pediatr Urol 2021; 17:704.e1.
  75. Furness PD 3rd, Cheng EY, Franco I, Firlit CF. The prune-belly syndrome: a new and simplified technique of abdominal wall reconstruction. J Urol 1998; 160:1195.
  76. Franco I. Laparoscopic assisted modification of the firlit abdominal wall plication. J Urol 2005; 174:280.
  77. Ger R, Coryllos EV. Management of the abdominal wall defect in the prune belly syndrome by muscle transposition: an 18-year follow-up. Clin Anat 2000; 13:341.
  78. Lam KS, Mehdian H. The importance of an intact abdominal musculature mechanism in maintaining spinal sagittal balance. Case illustration in prune-belly syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24:719.
  79. Dénes FT, Arap MA, Giron AM, et al. Comprehensive surgical treatment of prune belly syndrome: 17 years' experience with 32 patients. Urology 2004; 64:789.
  80. Arlen AM, Kirsch SS, Seidel NE, et al. Health-related Quality of Life in Children With Prune-belly Syndrome and Their Caregivers. Urology 2016; 87:224.
  81. Heini PF, Locher S, Schede CP, et al. Surgical treatment with the technique of Galveston-Luque of spine deformities associated with the prune belly syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop B 2004; 13:231.
  82. Duckett JW. The prune belly syndrome. In: Clinical Pediatric Urology, Kelalis PP, King LR (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia 1976.
  83. Burbige KA, Amodio J, Berdon WE, et al. Prune belly syndrome: 35 years of experience. J Urol 1987; 137:86.
  84. Fleming SD, Varughese E, Hua VK, et al. Normal live births after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a man with the rare condition of Eagle-Barrett syndrome (prune-belly syndrome). Fertil Steril 2013; 100:1532.
  85. Halpern JA, Das A, Brannigan RE. Successful sperm retrieval in prune belly syndrome. Asian J Urol 2020; 7:376.
  86. Hillman RT, Garabedian MJ, Wallerstein RJ. Pregnancy outcome in a woman with prune belly syndrome. BMJ Case Rep 2012; 2012.
Topic 5002 Version 28.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟