ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Comparison of different peritoneal dialysis solutions

Comparison of different peritoneal dialysis solutions
  Dextrose Amino acid Icodextrin
Low Ca++ High Ca++
Osmolality (mOsm/kg) 346, 396, and 485 346, 396, and 485 365 282
Molecular weight (Dalton) 182 182 100 to 200 20,000
Advantages

Well studied

Most commonly used for a long time

Side-effect profile well known to most of the nephrologists

Allow the use of oral calcium-containing phosphate binders

Same as low-calcium solutions except it may help bringing up serum calcium in patients with low calcium levels Can improve nutritional status in malnourished diabetic and/or patients with recurrent peritonitis

Sustained ultrafiltration for many hours

Decreased solute absorption

Disadvantages

Short-lived ultrafiltration

Metabolic complications like hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and weight gain

Can lead to low serum calcium and bone disease

Same as low calcium except it can limit the use of calcium-containing oral phosphate binders

Expensive

May increase nitrogen waste product in blood

May cause/worsen acidosis

Increases serum levels of maltose, maltotriose, and oligopolysacharides
Indications

Commonly used, first-line PD solution in all patients unless special circumstances exist

High serum phosphorus and normal to high serum calcium

Used in patients who have low calcium levels with low calcium-containing dialysis solutions

Malnourished diabetic patients or

Malnourished patients with recurrent peritonitis

Patients who lose ultrafiltration

In patients with automated PD situation during the dry day to achieve sustained UF and increased solute and fluid removal

In diabetic patients

PD: peritoneal dialysis; UF: ultrafiltration.
Courtesy of Dinesh Chatoth, MD.
Graphic 51006 Version 3.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟