ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 1 مورد

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma
Authors:
Karen J Marcus, MD, FACR
Matthias A Karajannis, MD, MS
Section Editors:
Patrick Y Wen, MD
Amar Gajjar, MD
Lia M Halasz, MD
Deputy Editor:
April F Eichler, MD, MPH
Literature review current through: Apr 2025. | This topic last updated: May 09, 2025.

INTRODUCTION — 

Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are rare and aggressive primary brain tumors primarily affecting children between 5 and 10 years of age. Treatment is challenging based on their critical location, infiltrative nature, and resistance to conventional therapies.

Children with DIPG typically present with a combination of cranial nerve palsies, hemiparesis, and ataxia. When biopsied, DIPG most commonly corresponds to a pathologic diagnosis of diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3 K27-altered. DIPG carries a uniformly poor prognosis despite standard therapies.

In contrast with DIPG, most other brainstem tumors in children involving the tectum, dorsal midbrain or medulla, or cervicomedullary junction are low-grade gliomas such as pilocytic astrocytoma. These and other pediatric low-grade gliomas are reviewed separately. (See "Focal brainstem glioma" and "Overview of pediatric low-grade gliomas".)

The epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of DIPG will be reviewed here. Other high-grade gliomas in childhood are reviewed separately. (See "Infant-type hemispheric gliomas" and "High-grade gliomas in children and adolescents".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — 

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) accounts for 10 to 20 percent of all central nervous system tumors in children and approximately one-third of high-grade gliomas in children [1]. The yearly incidence is estimated at two to three cases per 1 million children [1,2].

CLINICAL FEATURES

Clinical presentation — The median age at diagnosis of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is 6.8 years (range 0 to 27 years) [3]. Approximately 20 percent of patients are 10 years of age or older [4]. Males and females are affected in equal proportions.

Most patients present with a combination of cranial nerve palsies, hemiparesis, and/or ataxia. Cranial nerve VI (CNVI) and VII (CNVII) are most commonly affected, resulting in diplopia and facial weakness, respectively. Cranial nerves III, IV, IX, and X may also be involved. Symptoms tend to present subacutely and progress over days to weeks. Symptom duration leading up to diagnosis is 6 to 12 weeks or less in the vast majority of patients [3,5].

Hydrocephalus with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is observed in less than 10 percent of patients at presentation. Patients may be minimally symptomatic or present with typical signs of increased ICP (eg, headache, nausea and vomiting, lethargy). Those with obstructive hydrocephalus may benefit from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion. (See 'Symptomatic therapies' below.)

Significant intratumoral hemorrhage is present in approximately 6 percent of patients at the time of diagnosis, although small punctate hemorrhages can be seen in a higher percentage of cases [6]. Symptomatic hemorrhage may eventually occur in up to 20 percent of children, usually in necrotic areas of tumor.

Most patients present with localized disease, although spinal metastasis can be found in a small subset of patients at the time of initial diagnosis [7]. Diffuse brainstem gliomas tend to progress along established fiber tracts, especially into the thalamus and cerebellum, and distant disease dissemination involving the brain and/or spine are often seen at the end stages of the disease [8,9].

Neuroimaging — DIPGs are high-grade, expansile, infiltrative tumors centered within the pons. As with all other brain tumors, they are best visualized on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast, which may require anesthesia for sedation in younger children.

Computed tomography (CT) – On head CT, DIPGs are hypodense to isodense and may be relatively subtle on noncontrast images. Internal calcification is unusual. Expansion of the pons and mass effect on surrounding structures is often apparent and signals the need for MRI.

Brain MRI – On MRI, DIPGs are expansile lesions that are typically hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (image 1). T2 hyperintensity may extend into adjacent areas including the medulla or midbrain. Axial growth is commonly observed through the cerebellar peduncles and into the cerebellum, and the tumors expand the pons instead of displacing it. They frequently have exophytic components extending into the prepontine cistern and often encircle the basilar artery. On sagittal images, DIPGs appear to respect the pontomedullary boundary.

Contrast enhancement is variable and may be ring-enhancing with central areas of necrosis. Many DIPGs have no contrast enhancement. Lack of enhancement may be associated with improved prognosis. (See 'Prognosis' below.)

DIPGs often demonstrate areas of restricted diffusion with low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values indicative of high cellularity. Perfusion imaging may show increased relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) often shows an increase in the choline-to-N-acetylaspartate (Cho:NAA) ratio [10,11]. Where available, detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) by MRS may be useful in noninvasive diagnosis of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant glioma [12-15], which may occur in the brainstem [16,17]. (See 'Differential diagnosis' below.)

DIAGNOSIS — 

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) has traditionally been a clinical diagnosis, but biopsies are increasingly being performed to confirm an integrated histopathologic molecular diagnosis.

Clinical diagnosis — A clinical diagnosis of DIPG can be made without a biopsy in patients with a compatible clinical history, age, and imaging findings.

Brain MRI with and without contrast is the neuroimaging study of choice. We obtain advanced sequences, including perfusion-weighted imaging, whenever possible, and we obtain magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) selectively when there is diagnostic uncertainty. (See 'Neuroimaging' above.)

Spine MRI and lumbar puncture (LP) for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology are generally not performed unless there is clinical or radiographic concern for dissemination or an alternative diagnosis. LP should not be performed in the presence of hydrocephalus or effacement of the third or fourth ventricle.

Of note, minimally invasive molecular diagnostics (ie, "liquid biopsy" of blood or CSF) have become technically feasible and are beginning to enter clinical practice [18]. Such testing may aid in noninvasive molecular identification of brainstem gliomas [19].

Role of biopsy — Biopsy of a brainstem tumor is a high-risk procedure that should only be performed by a specialized neurosurgical team with pediatric oncology expertise. The main indications for biopsy of a suspected DIPG are [20]:

Atypical clinical or imaging findings suggestive of an alternative tumor that would be treated differently from DIPG. This includes older patients (eg, ≥12 years) who have an increased likelihood of having an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytoma. (See 'Differential diagnosis' below.)

Enrollment in a clinical trial in which biopsy tissue is used to identify aberrant molecular pathways in DIPG and/or guide eligibility for an investigational therapy [20]. (See 'Investigational therapies' below.)

Advances in neurosurgical techniques have permitted biopsy of DIPG to be performed safely at specialized centers [20-23]. The feasibility and safety of biopsy has been demonstrated in a multicenter prospective study of 53 children with presumed DIPG, in which 50 patients underwent stereotactic biopsy [24]. Two patients had procedural grade 3 adverse events (hypertension, apnea), and one patient developed a hemiparesis with incomplete recovery. There were no biopsy-related deaths, and all but one patient went on to receive planned radiation therapy at a median of 10 days postbiopsy. All but four samples yielded sufficient tissue for molecular analysis, including O6-methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation and whole genome sequencing.

Differential diagnosis — The differential diagnosis of DIPG includes both neoplastic and nonneoplastic etiologies.

Pediatric low-grade gliomas – Pediatric low-grade gliomas (eg, pilocytic astrocytoma, ganglioglioma) are the main tumors on the differential diagnosis in the brainstem in children (table 1). They are typically distinguished from DIPG by their location outside of the pons (eg, cervicomedullary junction, tectum) and a more focal/circumscribed or dorsal exophytic appearance on brain MRI (image 2 and image 3). (See "Overview of pediatric low-grade gliomas", section on 'Clinical features' and "Focal brainstem glioma".)

IDH-mutant astrocytomas – In adolescents and young adults, the differential diagnosis of DIPG includes infratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytoma [4,16,25]. Such tumors are more likely to be noncontrast enhancing than DIPGs and are often (but not always) associated with fewer clinical symptoms and/or a longer symptom duration. IDH-mutant astrocytomas make up approximately one-quarter of brainstem gliomas in adults and are more likely than hemispheric IDH-mutant tumors to harbor non-R123H variants in IDH1 or IDH2 [16,17,26]. They are important to distinguish from DIPG because treatment and prognosis are different, and multiple effective therapies are available. (See "Treatment and prognosis of IDH-mutant astrocytomas in adults".)

Other pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas – A small proportion of tumors with an imaging appearance consistent with DIPG are proven to be diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma, H3-wildtype, and IDH-wildtype at the time of biopsy (image 4 and table 2). Such tumors have a similarly poor prognosis compared with DIPG. Treatment is reviewed separately. (See "High-grade gliomas in children and adolescents".)

Nonneoplastic mimics – Vascular malformations, encephalitis, rare parasitic cysts, demyelinating disorders (eg, multiple sclerosis), and hamartomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are the most common causes of nonneoplastic lesions in the brainstem in children. These entities can typically be distinguished from DIPG by clinical context and neuroimaging. (See "Overview of the clinical features and diagnosis of brain tumors in adults", section on 'Differential diagnosis'.)

PATHOLOGY AND MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS

Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered — In the vast majority of cases, a clinical diagnosis of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) corresponds to a pathologic diagnosis of diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3 K27-altered (table 2) [27,28]. Most tumors have high-grade features (ie, mitotic figures, microvascular proliferation, necrosis) and are histologically consistent with World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4.

H3 K27-altered DMGs are pediatric-type high-grade gliomas occurring predominantly but not exclusively in children. Although the pons is the most common location, they also occur in the thalamus, spinal cord, and other midline sites and can affect both children and adults [29-31]. Of note, subsets of adult patients have a somewhat better prognosis compared with children [30,31].

Most H3 K27-altered DMGs harbor a characteristic mutation in one of the gene variants encoding histone 3 (H3). The mutations involve a substitution of lysine 27 to methionine (H3 K27M), which is present in all tumor cells [32-34] and results in altered binding of mutant histone H3 to polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), a key developmental regulator of gene expression [35]. PRC2 inactivation by K27M results in a global reduction of levels of H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) [35-37]. The less common K27-wildtype DMGs are characterized by a loss of K27me3 resulting from overexpression of EZHIP rather than K27M [38].

Co-occurring oncogenic driver alterations are present in the vast majority of H3 K27-altered DMGs and most commonly involve DNA repair (TP53, PPM1D), chromatin remodeling (ATRX), and tyrosine kinases (ACVR1, PDGFRA, PIK3CA) [29,38]. Depending on the primary genomic alteration, H3 K27-altered DMGs may be further subclassified as follows:

DMG, H3.3 K27-mutant – Such tumors harbor an H3.3 K27M mutation, frequently co-occurring with TP53/PPM1D mutations and platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) alterations [39]. This is the most common subclass, frequently seen in pontine, thalamic, and spinal cord tumors.

DMG, H3.1 or H3.2 K27-mutant – Such tumors harbor an H3.1 or H3.2 pK28M (K27M) mutation, frequently co-occurring with mutations in ACVR1 and PIK3CA, PIK3R1, or PTEN. This subclass can be found in pontine tumors but is rare among thalamic and spinal cord tumors.

Recurrent somatic mutations in ACVR1, a gene that encodes a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) type 1 receptor, have been identified in up to one-third of pediatric DIPGs [40-43]. Mutations result in activation of the BMP pathway and increased expression of a variety of downstream effectors, including Smad proteins and members of the ID gene family, which may represent potential therapeutic targets. These mutations are often associated with concurrent mutations in PI3K [42,44] and the H3.1 gene [42,43]; they may be associated with slightly better prognosis [45].

DMG, H3-wildtype with EZHIP overexpression – Such tumors exhibit loss of K27me3 resulting from overexpression of EZHIP [38] rather than K27M. ACVR1 and/or PIK3CA mutations are also frequently found in this group. This subclass is enriched for brainstem and thalamic tumors.

DMG, EGFR- (and H3 K27-) mutant – This subclass is characterized by EGFR mutations (insertion/deletion within exon 20 or p.A289T or p.A289V mutation), frequently co-occurring with TP53 mutations. This subclass is typically found in bithalamic DMGs.

The presence of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway alterations in H3 K27-altered DMGs (eg, FGFR1, BRAF, KRAS, NF1, PTPN11) and the absence of TP53 alterations have been associated with prolonged survival compared with tumors lacking these alterations [46-49]. Conversely, the presence of an H3 K27M mutation in MAPK-altered low-grade gliomas is associated with more aggressive biologic behavior and worse outcomes compared with other low-grade gliomas. (See "Overview of pediatric low-grade gliomas", section on 'Prognosis'.)

Relevant mouse models based on these molecular insights have been developed to aid in the identification of targeted therapies for DIPGs. (See 'Investigational therapies' below.)

Other histologies — Less commonly, biopsies of clinically-diagnosed DIPGs show either H3-wildtype/isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma or, in older patients, IDH-mutant astrocytoma. In such cases, the patient should be treated according to the alternative integrated histopathologic and molecular diagnosis. (See 'Differential diagnosis' above.)

TREATMENT — 

Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are inoperable, malignant tumors that are refractory to standard therapies. Management consists primarily of symptomatic therapies and radiation therapy. Participation in clinical trials is encouraged, particularly as the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors is unraveled and targeted therapies begin to enter clinical trials.

Symptomatic therapies — Symptomatic management consists primarily of glucocorticoids for control of peritumoral edema and surgical management of hydrocephalus, when necessary.

Glucocorticoids – The administration of glucocorticoids (eg, dexamethasone) is an important initial step in the treatment of patients with high-grade brainstem tumors. Peritumoral edema often contributes prominently to symptoms, which can improve rapidly after steroid therapy. Although steroids do not treat the underlying problem, improved clinical performance can be an important matter for quality of life in patients with a limited life span. Dexamethasone therapy is generally tailored to the clinical situation, with no standardized dosing or schedule [50].

Unfortunately, many patients require prolonged administration of dexamethasone, resulting in significant steroid-related complications. (See "Management of vasogenic edema in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors", section on 'Complications and prophylaxis'.)

BevacizumabBevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is commonly used in adult high-grade glioma patients to improve peritumoral edema and limit the long-term complications of glucocorticoids. However, the benefit in children with DIPG appears much more limited [51]. Successful treatment of radiation necrosis in patients with DIPG has been reported [52].

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion – Approximately one-quarter of patients with DIPG require treatment for hydrocephalus either at diagnosis or within the next several months [5]. CSF diversion is most commonly achieved with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement [53]. If feasible, endoscopic third ventriculostomy is an attractive alternative that obviates the need for implanted hardware [54]. (See "Hydrocephalus in children: Management and prognosis", section on 'CSF diversion procedures'.)

Radiation therapy — For all patients with DIPG, we recommend radiation therapy as the primary therapeutic modality. Radiation should be initiated as soon as possible after diagnosis. Patients with severe symptoms may require urgent initiation for control of symptoms.

Standard fractionation – The standard treatment dose is 1.8 gray (Gy) daily given five days per week, to a total dose of between 54 and 59.4 Gy [55]. The treatment field consists of the tumor volume on T2-weighted images plus a 1 to 2 cm margin [56].

Hypofractionated course – Hypofractionated radiation therapy, which delivers higher doses of radiation each day over fewer total days, has been evaluated to minimize the time spent in treatment [57-61]. This approach may be considered to provide improved quality of life and reduced financial burden to families, especially in young children requiring anesthesia for treatment.

In the largest of the trials of hypofractionated radiation among 253 children with newly diagnosed DIPG, overall survival ranged from 8.2 to 9.6 months and was similar across three randomized treatment groups: 39 Gy in 13 fractions (HF1), 45 Gy in 15 fractions (HF2), and 54 Gy in 30 fractions (standard fractionation) [61]. Acute and delayed side effects and toxicities were also similar across groups. However, for the subgroup of patients two to five years of age, the HF2 regimen appeared less effective compared with the HF1 and standard fractionation regimens.

Radiation therapy, which has been administered for more than half a century and typically results in transient improvement of both symptoms and imaging findings [62,63], remains the only treatment that appears to alter the clinical course of DIPG. As a result, no randomized clinical trials have been performed that did not include upfront adjuvant radiation therapy for all patients. Despite multiple trials of dose escalation, altered fractionation, concurrent chemotherapy, and radiosensitization, none of these modulations have been proven more effective than conventionally delivered radiation therapy [64-68].

The degree of tumor shrinkage induced by radiation therapy can be dramatic, and many patients experience improvement in symptoms. The response is generally transient, however, and the approach is ultimately palliative and not curative. Median survival is approximately 11 months, and the two-year and five-year overall survival rates are 10 and 2 percent, respectively [5]. (See 'Prognosis' below.)

Recurrent/progressive disease — Patients invariably progress despite standard radiation therapy at a median of six months after diagnosis [5]. Treatment failures are usually local and occur within the radiation therapy field [56]. Although up to one-third of patients have evidence of central nervous system dissemination at the time of progression, most symptoms are referred to the primary site [7,69].

Fractionated reirradiation of DIPG at the time of progression may be considered to temporarily extend palliation, although increased toxicities may result from this approach [70-72]. Treatment decisions must be individualized, taking into account the functional status of the patient and overall goals of care.

In a small prospective dose-escalation study, the lowest dose level (24 Gy in 12 fractions) was well tolerated and achieved imaging, clinical, and/or quality-of-life improvement in most patients; in all 12 patients, progression-free and overall survival from the start of reirradiation were 4.5 and 5.8 months, respectively [73]. Similarly, hypofractionated reirradiation with 20 to 30 Gy in 2 Gy fractions or 30 to 36 Gy in 3 Gy fractions was shown to be effective in a retrospective study [74].

Chemotherapy (ineffective) — Outside of a clinical trial, we do not administer temozolomide or any other systemic therapy during or after radiation therapy in patients with DIPG.

Numerous treatment protocols (including single chemotherapy agents, multidrug combination regimens, and high-dose therapy with stem cell rescue) have all been tested in both adults and children with DIPG without clear evidence of benefit [75-78]. The addition of temozolomide in particular has shown no survival benefit in phase II trials in children with DIPG when compared with historical controls treated with radiation alone [79,80] and in one small open-label randomized trial of radiation therapy with or without concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide [81].

Investigational therapies — A number of emerging preclinical insights are under investigation in clinical trials in DIPG [82-88]. Promising examples include use of an H3 K27M-mutant vaccine [89] and use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-expressing T cells with specific targeting against either GD2, a disialoganglioside that is highly expressed on the surface of H3 K27M-mutant glioma cells [88,90,91], or B7-H3, an immune regulatory protein expressed on DIPG [92,93].

In the largest published experience with investigational GD2 CAR-T cell therapy, 11 patients with H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG; nine with DIPGs and two with spinal tumors) who had received standard radiation therapy at least four weeks before enrollment were treated with lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by intravenous (IV) GD2-CAR-T cells; nine patients also received one or more doses of intracerebroventricular (ICV) CAR-T cells [91]. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was dose-limiting at dose level 2 with IV delivery; immune effector cell-associated acute neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) occurred in four of eight patients treated at dose level 2 and in none of the patients treated with ICV infusions. More than half of patients exhibited tumor shrinkage (including 4 of 11 with >50 percent volumetric tumor reduction), although direct attribution to CAR-T cell therapy was confounded by most patients having recently completed radiation therapy. Two patients were alive at 30 and 33 months after first infusion, respectively, including one with an ongoing complete response. Of note, genomic features that have been associated with prolonged survival [46,47] were present in both tumors. Based on these promising yet preliminary results, an ongoing clinical trial is focusing on ICV delivery.

The investigational oral compound ONC201 (dordaviprone) is under active investigation in H3 K27-altered midline gliomas [94,95]. The mechanism of action is not well defined but may involve mitochondrial metabolism and the stress response pathway [96]. In a molecularly unselected phase II trial of ONC201, a near-complete imaging response was observed in a patient with a recurrent H3 K27M-mutant thalamic glioma [94]. This finding prompted several prospective trials in children and adults with H3 K27M-mutant gliomas. In a summary of 50 patients with recurrent H3 K27M-mutant DMG treated with ONC201 on one of four clinical trials (46 adults, 4 children), the overall response rate was 20 percent with a median duration of response of 11.2 months (95% CI 3.8 to not yet reached) [97]. The drug was well tolerated, with a low rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (20 percent, most commonly fatigue, all grade 3 or lower). An international placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial is underway for patients with newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse gliomas excluding DIPG and spinal tumors (NCT05580562) [98].

Local therapies are also being studied, including DNX-2401, an oncolytic adenovirus administered by catheter infusion into the cerebellar peduncle [99].

Studies of systemic checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies have thus far shown no clear signal of efficacy [100].

PROGNOSIS — 

The prognosis of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is generally poor, with a median overall survival of 10 to 11 months [3,56,77,101,102]. Five-year survival is less than 3 percent, and many long-term survivors have evidence of moderate or severe cognitive impairment, likely as a consequence of radiation therapy [3,103].

Several studies have suggested that younger patients (age <3 years) and older patients (age >10 years) may have a somewhat better prognosis [4,101,103-105]. Other favorable prognostic factors include long interval between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis, lack of pontine cranial nerve palsies, and atypical radiologic characteristics (eg, lack of enhancement) [3,75,101,103,106,107].

Accumulating data also suggest that certain molecular markers in H3 K27-altered diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) are associated with improved survival. (See 'Diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered' above.)

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — 

Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Primary brain tumors".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Epidemiology – Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are rare and aggressive primary brain tumors primarily affecting children between 5 and 10 years of age. They account for 10 to 20 percent of all central nervous system tumors in children. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)

Clinical features – Most patients present with a combination of cranial nerve palsies, hemiparesis, and/or ataxia. The median age at diagnosis is 6.8 years. Symptoms tend to present subacutely and progress over days to weeks. (See 'Clinical presentation' above.)

On MRI, DIPGs are expansile, infiltrative tumors that are typically hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (image 1). Contrast enhancement is variable and may be ring-enhancing with central areas of necrosis. (See 'Neuroimaging' above.)

Diagnosis – A clinical diagnosis of DIPG can be made without a biopsy in patients with compatible clinical histories, ages, and imaging findings. Minimally invasive molecular diagnostics (ie, "liquid biopsy" of blood or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) have become technically feasible and are beginning to enter clinical practice. (See 'Clinical diagnosis' above.)

Biopsy of a brainstem tumor is a high-risk procedure that should only be performed by a specialized neurosurgical team with pediatric oncology expertise. The main indications for biopsy of a suspected DIPG are older age, atypical clinical or neuroimaging features, and anticipated clinical trial enrollment. (See 'Role of biopsy' above.)

Pathology – The vast majority of biopsied DIPGs represent H3 K27-altered diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) (table 2). Less commonly, biopsies of clinically-diagnosed DIPGs show either H3-wildtype/isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype diffuse pediatric-type high-grade glioma or, in older patients, IDH-mutant astrocytoma. (See 'Pathology and molecular pathogenesis' above and 'Differential diagnosis' above.)

Treatment – DIPGs are inoperable, and management consists primarily of symptomatic therapies to control peritumoral edema and radiation therapy. Participation in clinical trials is encouraged.

Glucocorticoids are used to control tumor-associated edema in symptomatic patients. Approximately one-quarter of patients with DIPG require treatment for hydrocephalus either at diagnosis or within the next several months. (See 'Symptomatic therapies' above.)

For all patients with DIPG, we recommend radiation therapy as the primary therapeutic modality (Grade 1C). The standard approach is to give a total dose of 54 to 59.4 gray (Gy) in fractions of 1.8 Gy five times per week. Alternatively, hypofractionation with 45 Gy in 15 fractions may be considered to provide improved quality of life and reduced financial burden to families, especially in young children requiring anesthesia for treatment. (See 'Radiation therapy' above.)

Outside of a clinical trial, we do not administer temozolomide or any other systemic therapy in patients with DIPG. Clinical trial participation is encouraged to evaluate novel therapies. (See 'Chemotherapy (ineffective)' above and 'Investigational therapies' above.)

Prognosis – Despite aggressive therapy, the prognosis remains generally poor, with an average survival of less than one year. (See 'Prognosis' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — 

The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Mark Kieran, MD, PhD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

  1. Patil N, Kelly ME, Yeboa DN, et al. Epidemiology of brainstem high-grade gliomas in children and adolescents in the United States, 2000-2017. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:990.
  2. Fonseca A, Afzal S, Bowes L, et al. Pontine gliomas a 10-year population-based study: a report from The Canadian Paediatric Brain Tumour Consortium (CPBTC). J Neurooncol 2020; 149:45.
  3. Hoffman LM, Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Colditz N, et al. Clinical, Radiologic, Pathologic, and Molecular Characteristics of Long-Term Survivors of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG): A Collaborative Report From the International and European Society for Pediatric Oncology DIPG Registries. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1963.
  4. Erker C, Lane A, Chaney B, et al. Characteristics of patients ≥10 years of age with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a report from the International DIPG/DMG Registry. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:141.
  5. Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Baugh J, Chaney B, et al. Development of the SIOPE DIPG network, registry and imaging repository: a collaborative effort to optimize research into a rare and lethal disease. J Neurooncol 2017; 132:255.
  6. Broniscer A, Laningham FH, Kocak M, et al. Intratumoral hemorrhage among children with newly diagnosed, diffuse brainstem glioma. Cancer 2006; 106:1364.
  7. Sethi R, Allen J, Donahue B, et al. Prospective neuraxis MRI surveillance reveals a high risk of leptomeningeal dissemination in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neurooncol 2011; 102:121.
  8. Singh S, Bhutani R, Jalali R. Leptomeninges as a site of relapse in locally controlled, diffuse pontine glioma with review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23:117.
  9. Gururangan S, McLaughlin CA, Brashears J, et al. Incidence and patterns of neuraxis metastases in children with diffuse pontine glioma. J Neurooncol 2006; 77:207.
  10. Hipp SJ, Steffen-Smith E, Hammoud D, et al. Predicting outcome of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas using multiparametric imaging. Neuro Oncol 2011; 13:904.
  11. Steffen-Smith EA, Shih JH, Hipp SJ, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts survival in children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neurooncol 2011; 105:365.
  12. Kalinina J, Carroll A, Wang L, et al. Detection of "oncometabolite" 2-hydroxyglutarate by magnetic resonance analysis as a biomarker of IDH1/2 mutations in glioma. J Mol Med (Berl) 2012; 90:1161.
  13. Andronesi OC, Rapalino O, Gerstner E, et al. Detection of oncogenic IDH1 mutations using magnetic resonance spectroscopy of 2-hydroxyglutarate. J Clin Invest 2013; 123:3659.
  14. Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ, et al. 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nat Med 2012; 18:624.
  15. Andronesi OC, Kim GS, Gerstner E, et al. Detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutated glioma patients by in vivo spectral-editing and 2D correlation magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4:116ra4.
  16. Banan R, Stichel D, Bleck A, et al. Infratentorial IDH-mutant astrocytoma is a distinct subtype. Acta Neuropathol 2020; 140:569.
  17. Oki S, Ishi Y, Sawaya R, et al. Clinical outcome, radiological findings, and genetic features of IDH-mutant brainstem glioma in adults. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:263.
  18. Miller AM, Szalontay L, Bouvier N, et al. Next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid for clinical molecular diagnostics in pediatric, adolescent and young adult brain tumor patients. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1763.
  19. Panditharatna E, Kilburn LB, Aboian MS, et al. Clinically Relevant and Minimally Invasive Tumor Surveillance of Pediatric Diffuse Midline Gliomas Using Patient-Derived Liquid Biopsy. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:5850.
  20. Walker DA, Liu J, Kieran M, et al. A multi-disciplinary consensus statement concerning surgical approaches to low-grade, high-grade astrocytomas and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas in childhood (CPN Paris 2011) using the Delphi method. Neuro Oncol 2013; 15:462.
  21. Puget S, Beccaria K, Blauwblomme T, et al. Biopsy in a series of 130 pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 2015; 31:1773.
  22. Roujeau T, Machado G, Garnett MR, et al. Stereotactic biopsy of diffuse pontine lesions in children. J Neurosurg 2007; 107:1.
  23. Pfaff E, El Damaty A, Balasubramanian GP, et al. Brainstem biopsy in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma in the era of precision medicine: The INFORM study experience. Eur J Cancer 2019; 114:27.
  24. Gupta N, Goumnerova LC, Manley P, et al. Prospective feasibility and safety assessment of surgical biopsy for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Neuro Oncol 2018; 20:1547.
  25. Li S, Zhao Y, Huang H. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of adult brainstem gliomas: A retrospective analysis of histologically-proven 40 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37910.
  26. Picca A, Berzero G, Bielle F, et al. FGFR1 actionable mutations, molecular specificities, and outcome of adult midline gliomas. Neurology 2018; 90:e2086.
  27. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1231.
  28. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Central Nervous System Tumours: WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2021.
  29. Mackay A, Burford A, Carvalho D, et al. Integrated Molecular Meta-Analysis of 1,000 Pediatric High-Grade and Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma. Cancer Cell 2017; 32:520.
  30. Vuong HG, Ngo TNM, Le HT, Dunn IF. The prognostic significance of HIST1H3B/C and H3F3A K27M mutations in diffuse midline gliomas is influenced by patient age. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:405.
  31. Sim Y, McClelland AC, Choi K, et al. A comprehensive multicenter analysis of clinical, molecular, and imaging characteristics and outcomes of H3 K27-altered diffuse midline glioma in adults. J Neurosurg 2025; 142:1307.
  32. Wu G, Broniscer A, McEachron TA, et al. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat Genet 2012; 44:251.
  33. Nikbakht H, Panditharatna E, Mikael LG, et al. Spatial and temporal homogeneity of driver mutations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat Commun 2016; 7:11185.
  34. Hoffman LM, DeWire M, Ryall S, et al. Spatial genomic heterogeneity in diffuse intrinsic pontine and midline high-grade glioma: Implications for diagnostic biopsy and targeted therapeutics. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2016; 4:1.
  35. Lewis PW, Müller MM, Koletsky MS, et al. Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric glioblastoma. Science 2013; 340:857.
  36. Bender S, Tang Y, Lindroth AM, et al. Reduced H3K27me3 and DNA hypomethylation are major drivers of gene expression in K27M mutant pediatric high-grade gliomas. Cancer Cell 2013; 24:660.
  37. Bechet D, Gielen GG, Korshunov A, et al. Specific detection of methionine 27 mutation in histone 3 variants (H3K27M) in fixed tissue from high-grade astrocytomas. Acta Neuropathol 2014; 128:733.
  38. Castel D, Kergrohen T, Tauziède-Espariat A, et al. Histone H3 wild-type DIPG/DMG overexpressing EZHIP extend the spectrum diffuse midline gliomas with PRC2 inhibition beyond H3-K27M mutation. Acta Neuropathol 2020; 139:1109.
  39. Puget S, Philippe C, Bax DA, et al. Mesenchymal transition and PDGFRA amplification/mutation are key distinct oncogenic events in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. PLoS One 2012; 7:e30313.
  40. Wu G, Diaz AK, Paugh BS, et al. The genomic landscape of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and pediatric non-brainstem high-grade glioma. Nat Genet 2014; 46:444.
  41. Taylor KR, Mackay A, Truffaux N, et al. Recurrent activating ACVR1 mutations in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat Genet 2014; 46:457.
  42. Fontebasso AM, Papillon-Cavanagh S, Schwartzentruber J, et al. Recurrent somatic mutations in ACVR1 in pediatric midline high-grade astrocytoma. Nat Genet 2014; 46:462.
  43. Buczkowicz P, Hoeman C, Rakopoulos P, et al. Genomic analysis of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas identifies three molecular subgroups and recurrent activating ACVR1 mutations. Nat Genet 2014; 46:451.
  44. Grill J, Puget S, Andreiuolo F, et al. Critical oncogenic mutations in newly diagnosed pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58:489.
  45. Vuong HG, Le HT, Ngo TNM, et al. H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas should be further molecularly stratified: an integrated analysis of 669 patients. J Neurooncol 2021; 155:225.
  46. Roberts HJ, Ji S, Picca A, et al. Clinical, genomic, and epigenomic analyses of H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma long-term survivors reveal a distinct group of tumors with MAPK pathway alterations. Acta Neuropathol 2023; 146:849.
  47. Auffret L, Ajlil Y, Tauziède-Espariat A, et al. A new subtype of diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27 and BRAF/FGFR1 co-altered: a clinico-radiological and histomolecular characterisation. Acta Neuropathol 2023; 147:2.
  48. Stegat L, Eckhardt A, Gocke A, et al. Integrated analyses reveal two molecularly and clinically distinct subtypes of H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas with prognostic significance. Acta Neuropathol 2024; 148:40.
  49. Gestrich C, Grieco K, Lidov HG, et al. H3K27-altered diffuse midline gliomas with MAPK pathway alterations: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2023; 83:30.
  50. Malbari F, Staggers KA, Minard CG, et al. Provider views on perioperative steroid use for patients with newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2020; 147:205.
  51. Evans M, Gill R, Bull KS. Does a Bevacizumab-based regime have a role in the treatment of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma? A systematic review. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac100.
  52. Liu AK, Macy ME, Foreman NK. Bevacizumab as therapy for radiation necrosis in four children with pontine gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75:1148.
  53. Giussani C, Guida L, Biassoni V, et al. Retrospective analysis of the clinical and radiological features of 94 consecutive DIPGs patients to investigate the factors determining the development of hydrocephalus and its impact on clinical status and survival. Childs Nerv Syst 2020; 36:2701.
  54. Guida L, Roux FE, Massimino M, et al. Safety and efficacy of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma related hydrocephalus: a Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 2018.
  55. NCCN Guidelines. Pediatric Central Nervous System Cancers Version 2.2025. Available at www.nccn.org.
  56. Tinkle CL, Simone B, Chiang J, et al. Defining Optimal Target Volumes of Conformal Radiation Therapy for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:838.
  57. Janssens GO, Gidding CE, Van Lindert EJ, et al. The role of hypofractionation radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic brainstem glioma in children: A pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73:722.
  58. Negretti L, Bouchireb K, Levy-Piedbois C, et al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma in children: A single institution's experience. J Neurooncol 2011; 104:773.
  59. Janssens GO, Jansen MH, Lauwers SJ, et al. Hypofractionation vs conventional radiation therapy for newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: A matched-cohort analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85:315.
  60. Zaghloul MS, Eldebawy E, Ahmed S, et al. Hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy for pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG): A randomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol 2014; 111:35.
  61. Zaghloul MS, Nasr A, Tolba M, et al. Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy For Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: A Noninferiority Randomized Study Including 253 Children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:360.
  62. PEIRCE CB. THE EFFICACY OF RADIATION THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF TUMORS OF THE BRAIN AND BRAIN STEM. Clin Neurosurg 1964; 10:195.
  63. Lassman LP, Arjona VE. Pontine gliomas of childhood. Lancet 1967; 1:913.
  64. Mandell LR, Kadota R, Freeman C, et al. There is no role for hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the management of children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic brainstem tumors: Results of a Pediatric Oncology Group phase III trial comparing conventional vs. hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43:959.
  65. Fisher PG, Donaldson SS. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the management of diffuse intrinsic brainstem tumors: When is enough enough? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999; 43:947.
  66. Freeman CR, Kepner J, Kun LE, et al. A detrimental effect of a combined chemotherapy-radiotherapy approach in children with diffuse intrinsic brain stem gliomas? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47:561.
  67. Marcus KJ, Dutton SC, Barnes P, et al. A phase I trial of etanidazole and hyperfractionated radiotherapy in children with diffuse brainstem glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55:1182.
  68. Walter AW, Gajjar A, Ochs JS, et al. Carboplatin and etoposide with hyperfractionated radiotherapy in children with newly diagnosed diffuse pontine gliomas: A phase I/II study. Med Pediatr Oncol 1998; 30:28.
  69. Donahue B, Allen J, Siffert J, et al. Patterns of recurrence in brain stem gliomas: Evidence for craniospinal dissemination. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 40:677.
  70. Fontanilla HP, Pinnix CC, Ketonen LM, et al. Palliative reirradiation for progressive diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Am J Clin Oncol 2012; 35:51.
  71. Lassaletta A, Strother D, Laperriere N, et al. Reirradiation in patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: The Canadian experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e26988.
  72. Shariff N, Moreno AS, Bennett J, et al. Re-irradiation for children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma and diffuse midline glioma. Radiother Oncol 2025; :110865.
  73. Amsbaugh MJ, Mahajan A, Thall PF, et al. A phase 1/2 trial of reirradiation for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:144.
  74. Mankuzhy NP, Tringale KR, Dunkel IJ, et al. Hypofractionated re-irradiation for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024; 71:e30929.
  75. Hargrave D, Bartels U, Bouffet E. Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: Critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7:241.
  76. Korones DN, Fisher PG, Kretschmar C, et al. Treatment of children with diffuse intrinsic brain stem glioma with radiotherapy, vincristine and oral VP-16: A Children's Oncology Group phase II study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008; 50:227.
  77. Massimino M, Spreafico F, Biassoni V, et al. Diffuse pontine gliomas in children: Changing strategies, changing results? A mono-institutional 20-year experience. J Neurooncol 2008; 87:355.
  78. Sirachainan N, Pakakasama S, Visudithbhan A, et al. Concurrent radiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide and cis-retinoic acid in children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Neuro Oncol 2008; 10:577.
  79. Cohen KJ, Heideman RL, Zhou T, et al. Temozolomide in the treatment of children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Neuro Oncol 2011; 13:410.
  80. Bailey S, Howman A, Wheatley K, et al. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma treated with prolonged temozolomide and radiotherapy--Results of a United Kingdom phase II trial (CNS 2007 04). Eur J Cancer 2013; 49:3856.
  81. Izzuddeen Y, Gupta S, Haresh KP, et al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy with temozolomide in diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas: A randomized controlled trial. J Neurooncol 2020; 146:91.
  82. Zarghooni M, Bartels U, Lee E, et al. Whole-genome profiling of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas highlights platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase as potential therapeutic targets. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:1337.
  83. Hashizume R, Andor N, Ihara Y, et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of histone demethylation as a therapy for pediatric brainstem glioma. Nat Med 2014; 20:1394.
  84. Grasso CS, Tang Y, Truffaux N, et al. Functionally defined therapeutic targets in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Nat Med 2015; 21:555.
  85. Piunti A, Hashizume R, Morgan MA, et al. Therapeutic targeting of polycomb and BET bromodomain proteins in diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Nat Med 2017; 23:493.
  86. Mohammad F, Weissmann S, Leblanc B, et al. EZH2 is a potential therapeutic target for H3K27M-mutant pediatric gliomas. Nat Med 2017; 23:483.
  87. Mount CW, Majzner RG, Sundaresh S, et al. Potent antitumor efficacy of anti-GD2 CAR T cells in H3-K27M+ diffuse midline gliomas. Nat Med 2018; 24:572.
  88. Majzner RG, Ramakrishna S, Yeom KW, et al. GD2-CAR T cell therapy for H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline gliomas. Nature 2022; 603:934.
  89. Grassl N, Poschke I, Lindner K, et al. A H3K27M-targeted vaccine in adults with diffuse midline glioma. Nat Med 2023; 29:2586.
  90. Lin FY, Stuckert A, Tat C, et al. Phase I Trial of GD2.CART Cells Augmented With Constitutive Interleukin-7 Receptor for Treatment of High-Grade Pediatric CNS Tumors. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2769.
  91. Monje M, Mahdi J, Majzner R, et al. Intravenous and intracranial GD2-CAR T cells for H3K27M+ diffuse midline gliomas. Nature 2025; 637:708.
  92. Vitanza NA, Wilson AL, Huang W, et al. Intraventricular B7-H3 CAR T Cells for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: Preliminary First-in-Human Bioactivity and Safety. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:114.
  93. Vitanza NA, Ronsley R, Choe M, et al. Intracerebroventricular B7-H3-targeting CAR T cells for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med 2025; 31:861.
  94. Arrillaga-Romany I, Chi AS, Allen JE, et al. A phase 2 study of the first imipridone ONC201, a selective DRD2 antagonist for oncology, administered every three weeks in recurrent glioblastoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8:79298.
  95. Chi AS, Tarapore RS, Hall MD, et al. Pediatric and adult H3 K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma treated with the selective DRD2 antagonist ONC201. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:97.
  96. Graves PR, Aponte-Collazo LJ, Fennell EMJ, et al. Mitochondrial Protease ClpP is a Target for the Anticancer Compounds ONC201 and Related Analogues. ACS Chem Biol 2019; 14:1020.
  97. Arrillaga-Romany I, Gardner SL, Odia Y, et al. ONC201 (Dordaviprone) in Recurrent H3 K27M-Mutant Diffuse Midline Glioma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1542.
  98. Arrillaga-Romany I, Lassman A, McGovern SL, et al. ACTION: a randomized phase 3 study of ONC201 (dordaviprone) in patients with newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S173.
  99. Gállego Pérez-Larraya J, Garcia-Moure M, Labiano S, et al. Oncolytic DNX-2401 Virus for Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:2471.
  100. Dunkel IJ, Doz F, Foreman NK, et al. Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in pediatric patients with high-grade CNS malignancies: Safety, efficacy, biomarker, and pharmacokinetics-CheckMate 908. Neuro Oncol 2023; 25:1530.
  101. Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Lane A, Heymans MW, et al. External validation of the diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma survival prediction model: A collaborative report from the International DIPG Registry and the SIOPE DIPG Registry. J Neurooncol 2017; 134:231.
  102. Hassan H, Pinches A, Picton SV, Phillips RS. Survival rates and prognostic predictors of high grade brain stem gliomas in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2017; 135:13.
  103. Jackson S, Patay Z, Howarth R, et al. Clinico-radiologic characteristics of long-term survivors of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neurooncol 2013; 114:339.
  104. Broniscer A, Laningham FH, Sanders RP, et al. Young age may predict a better outcome for children with diffuse pontine glioma. Cancer 2008; 113:566.
  105. Bartlett AL, Lane A, Chaney B, et al. Characteristics of children ≤36 months of age with DIPG: A report from the international DIPG registry. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:2190.
  106. Sanford RA, Freeman CR, Burger P, Cohen ME. Prognostic criteria for experimental protocols in pediatric brainstem gliomas. Surg Neurol 1988; 30:276.
  107. Freeman CR, Bourgouin PM, Sanford RA, et al. Long term survivors of childhood brain stem gliomas treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Clinical characteristics and treatment related toxicities. The Pediatric Oncology Group. Cancer 1996; 77:555.
Topic 5229 Version 58.0

References