ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN): Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN): Pathophysiology and clinical manifestations
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Nov 13, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas include serous cystic tumors, mucinous cystic neoplasms, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, cystic islet cell tumors, and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) [1-3]. IPMNs have also been referred to as mucinous duct ectasias and intraductal papillary mucinous tumors. IPMNs are potentially malignant intraductal epithelial neoplasms that are grossly visible (>1 cm) and are composed of mucin-producing columnar cells. The lesions show papillary proliferation, cyst formation, and varying degrees of cellular atypia [4,5]. IPMNs may involve the main pancreatic duct, the branch ducts, or both. (See "Classification of pancreatic cysts".)

This topic will review the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of IPMNs. The diagnosis and treatment of IPMNs, as well as an overview of pancreatic cystic neoplasms, are presented separately. (See "Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN): Evaluation and management" and "Classification of pancreatic cysts" and "Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management".)

EPIDEMIOLOGY — Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) was first described in 1982 when four patients with pancreatic carcinoma and favorable outcomes were reported. The patients were noted to have dilated main pancreatic ducts, patulous ampullary orifices, and mucus secretion from the pancreatic duct. With time, the incidence of IPMN has increased, largely due to increased diagnosis [6]. Prior to 1999, the distinction between IPMN and mucinous cystic neoplasm had not been clarified, so many lesions previously classified as MCNs may have, in fact, been IPMNs. In addition, improvements in imaging technology have led to more accurate identification of cystic pancreatic lesions.

The true incidence of IPMN is not known because many IPMNs are small and asymptomatic. A series of 2832 consecutive computed tomography scans performed in adults without a history of pancreatic lesions or factors predisposing to pancreatic disease found pancreatic cysts in 73 (2.6 percent) [7]. In a similar study of 616 consecutive patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging, the incidence of pancreatic cysts was higher (13.5 percent), with a median diameter of 6 mm [8]. Many of these were likely IPMNs since it is thought that IPMNs account for 1 to 3 percent of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms and 20 to 50 percent of cystic pancreatic neoplasms [9-11].

The male-to-female ratio for main duct IPMN has varied in reports from 1.1 to 3:1, and for branch duct IPMN it has varied from 0.7 to 1.8:1 [12]. The ratio varies geographically, with a male predominance in Japan and Korea and a more even distribution or female predominance in the United States and Europe. The typical age at presentation is in the fifth to seventh decade [13] (table 1).

IPMN may be more common in patients who smoke cigarettes, who have diabetes [14], who have a family history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [14], or who have chronic pancreatitis [14], Peutz-Jeghers syndrome [15], familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome [16], or familial pancreatic carcinoma (familial clustering of multiple first- and second-degree relatives with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) [17,18].

CLASSIFICATION — Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) are classified anatomically as well as histologically.

Anatomic classification — IPMNs have been classified as main duct IPMN or branch duct IPMN based upon the anatomic involvement of the pancreatic duct [19]. Patients with involvement of both the main and branch ducts are referred to as having mixed-type IPMN, though pathologically the lesions behave like main duct IPMN. The characteristic pathologic features include diffuse or segmental dilation of the pancreatic duct without stricturing, intraductal expansion of mucin-producing ductal cells (which may be flat or projecting into the lumen), and dilation of either one or both pancreatic orifices, through which there is copious secretion of mucus.

Main duct IPMNs involve the main pancreatic duct diffusely or segmentally. The majority arise within the head of the pancreas and progress distally with or without involvement of the side branches. They are histologically more aggressive than branch duct IPMNs and more likely to harbor a malignancy [20].

Branch duct IPMNs occur in younger patients and arise in the uncinate process, although they may also involve the tail of the pancreas [19]. Branch duct IPMNs may have a lower risk of malignant transformation compared with main duct IPMNs [21].

Histologic classification — IPMNs can also be classified based on their histologic subtype, which is associated with the likelihood of developing dysplasia or malignancy. (See 'Progression to pancreatic cancer' below and 'Pancreatic malignancy' below.)

Four histologic subtypes have been described (see "Pathology of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms", section on 'Histology and grading') [22,23]:

Intestinal type – This is the most common subtype of main duct IPMN. It typically occurs in the pancreatic head, though it may involve the entire duct. Its growth pattern is villous (picture 1), and it expresses Mucin-2 (MUC2), MUC5, and caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2). When invasive, it corresponds with mucinous (colloid) carcinoma, which is characterized by stromal pools of extraluminal mucin.

Pancreatobiliary type – Like intestinal-type IPMN, pancreatobiliary-type IPMN typically involves the main duct in the pancreatic head, but it produces less mucus than intestinal-type IPMN. Histologically, it is composed of complex arborizing papillae. The cells resemble pancreatic and biliary duct cells. It only expresses MUC1 and MUC5. Its invasive form corresponds with a conventional ductal (tubular) adenocarcinoma.

Oncocytic type – Oncocytic-type IPMN is rare. It often forms large tissue nodules in the main pancreatic duct and produces little mucus. Histologically, oncocytic-type IPMN is composed of complex papillae like pancreatobiliary-type IPMN, but cytoplasm of the lining cells is eosinophilic (picture 2). It inconsistently expresses MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC, and the expression may be focal.

Gastric type – Gastric-type IPMN corresponds to branch duct IPMN and is the most common subtype overall. It is typically found in the periphery of the pancreatic parenchyma, often in the uncinate process. The cells lining papillary projections in gastric-type IPMN resemble gastric foveolar cells and form pyloric gland-like structures at the base of the papillae (picture 3). The cells consistently express MUC5AC and MUC6. They do not express or are only focally positive for MUC1 and MUC2. Its invasive form corresponds with a conventional ductal (tubular) adenocarcinoma.

PATHOGENESIS — IPMNs originate from stem cells in the pancreatic ducts. Several molecular abnormalities have been described in IPMN (see "Molecular pathogenesis of exocrine pancreatic cancer"):

K-ras mutations are found in approximately one-half of cases, with an increasing frequency of these mutations correlating with neoplastic transformation [24]. K-ras is a GTP-binding protein that mediates signal transduction from growth factor receptors to the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway. Mutations in K-ras result in constitutively active MAP kinase signaling. K-ras mutations have been weakly associated with progression to malignancy in IPMN (odds ratio [OR] 2) [25].

Mutations in the tumor suppressor gene CDKN2a have been seen in association with IPMN, and a minority of IPMN will display aberrant expression of p53 and SMAD4 (DPC4) [26]. SMAD4 is inactivated in approximately 50 percent of pancreatic cancers [27,28], but is expressed in most IPMNs.

Inactivating mutations in the ring finger protein 43 [RNF43] gene, a component of ubiquitin-dependent pathways, have been associated with the development of IPMN, establishing the role of RNF43 in suppressing IPMN and MCN [29]. Mutations in the GNAS complex locus, which encodes the alpha subunit of guanine nucleotide-binding protein, have also been identified in IPMN [30]. In fact, either K-ras or GNAS mutations may be identified in up to 96 percent of IPMNs [30].

IPMNs have been seen in a subset of patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome who have mutations in STK11 [16]; STK11 mutations are also known to predispose to pancreatic cancer. (See "Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management", section on 'Epidemiology and genetics'.)

MUC2 mucin and MUC5 mucin mRNA are highly expressed in IPMN. MUC1 can be identified in up to 90 percent of early pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs) and 86 percent of IPMNs, depending on the antibodies used for detection [31]. The presence of MUC1 or MUC2 has been associated with malignancy (OR 6 and 4, respectively) [25].

Hypermethylation of promoter sequences can lead to gene silencing, and hypermethylation events involving tumor suppressor genes have been described in association with higher grades of dysplasia and cancer in patients with IPMN [32,33].

Other genetic markers that have been associated with malignancy in patients with IPMN include human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and Sonic hedgehog (Shh) (OR 11 and 7, respectively) [25].

Progression to pancreatic cancer — With variable frequency depending on several factors, IPMNs are thought to follow an orderly progression from a benign neoplasm to invasive carcinoma of the pancreas in some patients over time. (See "Pathology of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms", section on 'Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms'.)

IPMNs are graded according to the most atypical area in the lesion [22,34]:

Low-grade dysplasia (formerly adenoma)

Moderate dysplasia (formerly borderline)

High-grade dysplasia (formerly carcinoma in situ)

Invasive carcinoma

Cancers are typically characterized as either tubular type (morphologically indistinguishable from ductal adenocarcinoma) or colloid type (morphologically similar to cancers of other exocrine organs such as the breast and skin). Colloid carcinomas have a better prognosis than do tubular carcinomas. In one series, the five-year survival rate of patients with colloid carcinomas was 57 percent, compared with 37 percent for those with tubular carcinomas.

Previously, the rate of progression from low-grade dysplasia to invasive carcinoma was thought to be extremely slow (approximately 15 to 20 years) [35]. It is now estimated that the progression takes five to six years [36,37]. The risk of developing carcinoma varies with the subtype of IPMN [22]. Colloid carcinoma develops in 30 to 50 percent of patients with intestinal-type IPMN, and ductal adenocarcinoma develops in more than 50 percent of patients with pancreatobiliary-type IPMN and in 10 to 30 percent of patients with gastric-type (branch duct) IPMN. The rate of cancer development in patients with oncocytic-type IPMN is not well defined but thought to be higher risk given that most lesions of this subtype do have high-grade dysplasia [34]. (See 'Pancreatic malignancy' below.)

CLINICAL PRESENTATION — Many patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) have no symptoms, with the neoplasm being detected incidentally when imaging studies are performed for unrelated indications [22]. Other patients may have nonspecific symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, back pain, weight loss, or anorexia. Because the main pancreatic duct may be obstructed by mucin, some patients have pancreatitis-like symptoms and may develop exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency and maldigestion. Often there is a delay in diagnosis of up to several months due to the insidious nature of this disease and the lack of awareness of this entity among clinicians [38-40].

Although in some patients there may be elevations of pancreatic enzymes with episodes of pain (with or without biliary obstruction), in most cases routine laboratory tests are normal. Tumor markers such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen are elevated in less than 20 percent of cases of noninvasive IPMN and, if elevated, are suggestive of malignant transformation [41].

RISK OF MALIGNANCY — Patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) are at risk for both pancreatic and extrapancreatic malignancies.

Pancreatic malignancy — The risk of carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma in main duct IPMN is approximately 70 percent, and there are no radiographic or clinical characteristics that reliably predict malignancy in main duct IPMN [3,42].

The majority of patients with branch duct IPMN have a prolonged course without the development of cancer [3,20,21,36,43-47].

In a study of 1404 consecutive patients with branch duct IPMNs, the overall incidence rate of pancreatic carcinoma 5, 10, and 15-years after IPMN diagnosis were 3.3, 6.6 and 15 percent respectively [48]. IPMN size (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.85; 95% CI, 1.38-2.48 for a 10-mm increase in size) and the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (SHR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.33-1.83 for a 1-mm increase in diameter) were associated with an increase in incidence of IPMN-derived carcinoma but not concomitant pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma.

Studies have also suggested that IPMN diameter >3 cm is associated with an increased risk of malignancy [49]. Lesions between 2 and 3 cm have a risk of malignancy of 10 to 25 percent, and malignancy is rare in tumors less than 2 cm in size. Factors associated with malignancy in patients whose tumors are <3 cm include older age, male sex, presence of symptoms, and presence of concerning radiographic features (eg, solid components, pancreatic ductal dilation ≥10 mm, lymphadenopathy). In particular, the presence of mural nodules should raise concern for malignancy [49,50]. The presence of synchronous lesions and an increase in cyst size [51] during follow-up have also been considered risk factors by other experts. However, a small risk of malignancy exists even when IPMN is discovered incidentally [52].

The risk of developing pancreatic cancer in patients with small IPMNs that have remained stable in size on surveillance without the development of high risk or worrisome features is low. In an international multicenter study that included 3844 patients with presumed BD-IPMN without worrisome features or high-risk stigmata at diagnosis, 775 (20 percent) developed worrisome features and 68 (1.8 percent) developed high-risk stigmata after a median surveillance of 53 months. In 1617 patients (42 percent), IPMNs remained stable without developing worrisome features or high-risk stigmata for at least five years [53]. In patients ≥75 years, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for pancreatic cancer was 1.12 (95% CI, 0.23-3.39), and in patients 65 years or older with stable lesions <15 mm after five years, the SIR was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.11-3.42). The all-cause mortality for patients who did not develop worrisome features or high-risk stigmata for at least five years was 4.9 percent, but disease-specific mortality was 0.3 percent. The cumulative incidence of worrisome features or high-risk stigmata after the first five years was 6.1 percent and their development was associated with an increased the risk of pancreatic cancer (HR 2.79 and 5.52, respectively), but the absolute number of IPMN-associated malignancies in this group was small.

A concerning report of long-term close follow-up of branch duct IPMN in Japan reported a fourfold higher rate of pancreatic cancer developing in branch duct IPMN cases, separate and distinct from the IPMN lesion [54]. The 2 percent cancer rate in the branch duct IPMN lesions over five years compares with other series, but the finding of an 8 percent separate ductal pancreatic cancer rate needs confirmation.

The histologic subtype of the IPMN may be associated with the risk of malignancy and survival [55,56]. The risk appears to be highest for oncocytic- and pancreatobiliary-type IPMNs and lowest for gastric-type IPMNs (see 'Histologic classification' above):

One series examined 103 IPMNs that were resected because they had features putting them at increased risk for malignancy (main duct IPMNs, branch duct IPMNs larger than 3 cm, mural nodules) [55]. The histopathologic subtypes were determined based on the mucin (MUC) expression pattern. Invasive carcinoma was seen in 90 percent of pancreatobiliary-type IPMNs, in 75 percent of patients with oncocytic-type IPMNs, in 56 percent of intestinal-type IPMNs, and in 31 percent of gastric-type IPMNs. Patients with pancreatobiliary-type IPMNs had the lowest survival (mean five-year survival rate of 36 percent). Among patients with intestinal-type, oncocytic-type, and gastric-type IPMNs, the five-year survival rates were 87, 75, 70 percent, respectively. (See 'Histologic classification' above.)

In a second study that included analysis of 212 surgically resected IPMNs, the risk of invasive IPMN was again associated with the histologic subtype [56]. The proportion of IPMNs that were invasive based on subtype was 14 percent (19 of 135) for gastric type, 42 percent for intestinal type (16 of 38), 58 percent (22 of 38) for pancreatobiliary type, and 100 percent (2 of 2) for oncocytic type. However, among those with invasive IPMN, histologic subtype was not predictive of survival on multivariable analysis.

Of note, there is a distinction to be made in terms of the general risk of developing pancreatic cancer in the setting of having IPMN with a distinct lesion versus developing a pancreatic cancer that arises from IPMN. Among patients with IPMN, the general risk of developing pancreatic cancer that is separate from the IPMN is approximately 2.8 percent [57].

Extrapancreatic malignancies — Some studies suggest that patients with IPMN may be at increased risk for extrapancreatic malignancies, including gastric cancer, colorectal carcinoma, bile duct cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma [58-64]:

One of the largest series included 385 patients with a pancreatic cystic neoplasm, 210 of whom had IPMNs [60]. An extrapancreatic malignancy was discovered in 34 percent of patients with IPMN compared with 12 percent of those with non-IPMN cystic neoplasms. The diagnosis of the extrapancreatic malignancy preceded the diagnosis of IPMN in 21, coincided with the diagnosis of IPMN in 51, and followed the diagnosis of IPMN in 5. The most common cancers were gastric cancer (29 patients), colorectal carcinoma (16 patients), cancer of the common bile duct (7 patients), and lymphoma (4 patients). Five patients had multiple extrapancreatic cancers. On multivariate analysis, the only predictor of an extrapancreatic malignancy was advanced age at diagnosis of the IPMN.

A similar rate of extrapancreatic malignancies was described in another series of 61 patients who underwent resection for IPMN at a single institution [59]. An extrapancreatic neoplasm was observed in 24 patients (39 percent), including 18 patients (30 percent) who had an extrapancreatic malignant neoplasm. The most common neoplasms were gastric adenocarcinoma and colorectal carcinoma. These malignancies occurred much more commonly than observed in a control group of patients with mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

A third series that included 390 patients with IPMN found extrapancreatic malignancies in 92 (24 percent). Compared with expected cancer rates, patients were at increased risk for colorectal carcinoma (observed-to-expected [O/E] ratio 2.3), renal cell carcinoma (O/E ratio 6.0), and thyroid carcinoma (O/E ratio 5.6).

A fourth study with 816 patients with IPMN did not find an increased risk of extrapancreatic malignancy when cancer rates in patients with IPMN were compared with European cancer statistics (matched for sex and adjusted for age) [65]. The standardized incidence ratio for extrapancreatic malignancies in patients with IPMN was 1.5 (95% CI 0.94-2.2) for women and 1.4 (95% CI 0.90-2.1) for men.

A fifth study, a systematic review and meta-analysis including 8709 patients, found the overall rate of extrapancreatic malignancy in patients with IPMN to be 27.3 percent. The rate was higher for those patients with main duct versus branch duct IPMN. Biliary cancers occurred more frequently in the IPMN patients, whereas there was no difference in rates of gastric or colorectal cancer [66].

The explanation for increased rate of cancer in some studies is unclear. One possibility is that patients with IPMN are subjected to increased surveillance and thus detection of extrapancreatic tumors. Alternatively, patients with IPMN may have an as yet uncharacterized hereditary predisposition to cancer or have been exposed to carcinogens leading to a cancer predisposition.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Pancreatic cancer" and "Society guideline links: Pancreatic cysts".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are precancerous lesions with a well-described adenoma carcinoma sequence. (See 'Progression to pancreatic cancer' above.)

IPMNs are classified as main duct or branch duct based upon the anatomic involvement of the pancreatic duct. Patients with involvement of both the main and branch ducts are referred to as having mixed-type IPMN, though pathologically the lesions behave like main duct IPMN. (See 'Anatomic classification' above.)

Histologically, IPMNs are classified as intestinal type, pancreatobiliary type, oncocytic type, and gastric type. (See 'Histologic classification' above.)

Many patients with IPMN have no symptoms, with the neoplasm being detected incidentally when imaging studies are performed for unrelated indications. Other patients may have nonspecific symptoms. Because the main pancreatic duct may be obstructed by mucin, some patients have pancreatitis-like symptoms and elevated pancreatic enzymes. They may also develop exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency and maldigestion.

The risk of high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma in main duct IPMN is approximately 70 percent, whereas the majority of patients without main duct involvement have a prolonged course without the development of cancer. (See 'Pancreatic malignancy' above.)

Cancers are typically characterized as either tubular type (morphologically indistinguishable from ductal adenocarcinoma) or colloid type (morphologically similar to cancers of other exocrine organs such as the breast and skin). Colloid carcinomas have a better prognosis than do tubular carcinomas.

Patients with IPMN appear to be at increased risk for extrapancreatic malignancies. (See 'Extrapancreatic malignancies' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Douglas A Howell, MD, FASGE, FACG, who contributed to earlier versions of this topic review.

  1. BECKER WF, WELSH RA, PRATT HS. CYSTADENOMA AND CYSTADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS. Ann Surg 1965; 161:845.
  2. Lichtenstein DR, Carr-Locke DL. Mucin-secreting tumors of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995; 5:237.
  3. Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006; 6:17.
  4. Longnecker DS, Adsay NV, Fernandez-del Castillo C, et al. Histopathological diagnosis of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms: interobserver agreement. Pancreas 2005; 31:344.
  5. Hruban RH, Takaori K, Klimstra DS, et al. An illustrated consensus on the classification of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28:977.
  6. Klibansky DA, Reid-Lombardo KM, Gordon SR, Gardner TB. The clinical relevance of the increasing incidence of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10:555.
  7. Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191:802.
  8. Lee KS, Sekhar A, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I. Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105:2079.
  9. Kosmahl M, Pauser U, Peters K, et al. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas and tumor-like lesions with cystic features: a review of 418 cases and a classification proposal. Virchows Arch 2004; 445:168.
  10. Allen PJ, D'Angelica M, Gonen M, et al. A selective approach to the resection of cystic lesions of the pancreas: results from 539 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2006; 244:572.
  11. Lee CJ, Scheiman J, Anderson MA, et al. Risk of malignancy in resected cystic tumors of the pancreas < or =3 cm in size: is it safe to observe asymptomatic patients? A multi-institutional report. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12:234.
  12. Ingkakul T, Thayer SP, Ferrone CR, et al. Epidemiology of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: gender differences between 3 geographic regions. Journal of the Japan Pancreas Society 2010; 25:436.
  13. Khalid A, Brugge W. ACG practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:2339.
  14. Capurso G, Boccia S, Salvia R, et al. Risk factors for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas: a multicentre case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:1003.
  15. Sato N, Rosty C, Jansen M, et al. STK11/LKB1 Peutz-Jeghers gene inactivation in intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Am J Pathol 2001; 159:2017.
  16. Maire F, Hammel P, Terris B, et al. Intraductal papillary and mucinous pancreatic tumour: a new extracolonic tumour in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut 2002; 51:446.
  17. Poley JW, Kluijt I, Gouma DJ, et al. The yield of first-time endoscopic ultrasonography in screening individuals at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:2175.
  18. Canto MI, Goggins M, Yeo CJ, et al. Screening for pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals: an EUS-based approach. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2:606.
  19. Terris B, Ponsot P, Paye F, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas confined to secondary ducts show less aggressive pathologic features as compared with those involving the main pancreatic duct. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24:1372.
  20. Serikawa M, Sasaki T, Fujimoto Y, et al. Management of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: treatment strategy based on morphologic classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40:856.
  21. Lévy P, Jouannaud V, O'Toole D, et al. Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: actuarial risk of malignancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:460.
  22. Grützmann R, Niedergethmann M, Pilarsky C, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: biology, diagnosis, and treatment. Oncologist 2010; 15:1294.
  23. Hruban RH, Pitman MB, Klimstra DS. Tumors of the pancreas. In: Atlas of tumor pathology, 6th ed, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 2007. Vol 4.
  24. Raimondo M, Tachibana I, Urrutia R, et al. Invasive cancer and survival of intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97:2553.
  25. Nissim S, Idos GE, Wu B. Genetic markers of malignant transformation in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: a meta-analysis. Pancreas 2012; 41:1195.
  26. Furukawa T, Fujisaki R, Yoshida Y, et al. Distinct progression pathways involving the dysfunction of DUSP6/MKP-3 in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Mod Pathol 2005; 18:1034.
  27. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Klimstra DS, Adsay NV, et al. Dpc-4 protein is expressed in virtually all human intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: comparison with conventional ductal adenocarcinomas. Am J Pathol 2000; 157:755.
  28. Moore PS, Orlandini S, Zamboni G, et al. Pancreatic tumours: molecular pathways implicated in ductal cancer are involved in ampullary but not in exocrine nonductal or endocrine tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer 2001; 84:253.
  29. Wu J, Jiao Y, Dal Molin M, et al. Whole-exome sequencing of neoplastic cysts of the pancreas reveals recurrent mutations in components of ubiquitin-dependent pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:21188.
  30. Wu J, Matthaei H, Maitra A, et al. Recurrent GNAS mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3:92ra66.
  31. Gold DV, Karanjawala Z, Modrak DE, et al. PAM4-reactive MUC1 is a biomarker for early pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:7380.
  32. House MG, Guo M, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Herman JG. Molecular progression of promoter methylation in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas. Carcinogenesis 2003; 24:193.
  33. Sato N, Matsubayashi H, Abe T, et al. Epigenetic down-regulation of CDKN1C/p57KIP2 in pancreatic ductal neoplasms identified by gene expression profiling. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:4681.
  34. Castellano-Megías VM, Andrés CI, López-Alonso G, Colina-Ruizdelgado F. Pathological features and diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 6:311.
  35. Yanagisawa A, Ohashi K, Hori M, et al. Ductectatic-type mucinous cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma of the human pancreas: a novel clinicopathological entity. Jpn J Cancer Res 1993; 84:474.
  36. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an updated experience. Ann Surg 2004; 239:788.
  37. Salvia R, Fernández-del Castillo C, Bassi C, et al. Main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: clinical predictors of malignancy and long-term survival following resection. Ann Surg 2004; 239:678.
  38. Rivera JA, Fernández-del Castillo C, Pins M, et al. Pancreatic mucinous ductal ectasia and intraductal papillary neoplasms. A single malignant clinicopathologic entity. Ann Surg 1997; 225:637.
  39. Bastid C, Bernard JP, Sarles H, et al. Mucinous ductal ectasia of the pancreas: a premalignant disease and a cause of obstructive pancreatitis. Pancreas 1991; 6:15.
  40. Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Shimizu S, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the pancreas: a clinical review of 13 benign and four malignant tumours. Eur J Surg 1999; 165:223.
  41. Fritz S, Hackert T, Hinz U, et al. Role of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between benign and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Br J Surg 2011; 98:104.
  42. Crippa S, Aleotti F, Longo E, et al. Main Duct Thresholds for Malignancy Are Different in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreatic Head and Body-Tail. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:390.
  43. de la Fuente J, Chatterjee A, Lui J, et al. Long-Term Outcomes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2337799.
  44. D'Angelica M, Brennan MF, Suriawinata AA, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an analysis of clinicopathologic features and outcome. Ann Surg 2004; 239:400.
  45. McGrath K, Slivka A. Diagnosis and management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 2:316.
  46. Salvia R, Partelli S, Crippa S, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas with multifocal involvement of branch ducts. Am J Surg 2009; 198:709.
  47. Sawai Y, Yamao K, Bhatia V, et al. Development of pancreatic cancers during long-term follow-up of side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Endoscopy 2010; 42:1077.
  48. Oyama H, Tada M, Takagi K, et al. Long-term Risk of Malignancy in Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:226.
  49. Sugiyama M, Izumisato Y, Abe N, et al. Predictive factors for malignancy in intraductal papillary-mucinous tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 2003; 90:1244.
  50. Schmidt CM, White PB, Waters JA, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: predictors of malignant and invasive pathology. Ann Surg 2007; 246:644.
  51. Kang MJ, Jang JY, Kim SJ, et al. Cyst growth rate predicts malignancy in patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9:87.
  52. Fernández-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP, et al. Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138:427.
  53. Marchegiani G, Pollini T, Burelli A, et al. Surveillance for Presumed BD-IPMN of the Pancreas: Stability, Size, and Age Identify Targets for Discontinuation. Gastroenterology 2023; 165:1016.
  54. Uehara H, Nakaizumi A, Ishikawa O, et al. Development of ductal carcinoma of the pancreas during follow-up of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Gut 2008; 57:1561.
  55. Distler M, Kersting S, Niedergethmann M, et al. Pathohistological subtype predicts survival in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2013; 258:324.
  56. Kang MJ, Lee KB, Jang JY, et al. Evaluation of clinical meaning of histological subtypes of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Pancreas 2013; 42:959.
  57. Lafemina J, Katabi N, Klimstra D, et al. Malignant progression in IPMN: a cohort analysis of patients initially selected for resection or observation. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20:440.
  58. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Extrapancreatic neoplasms occur with unusual frequency in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:470.
  59. Choi MG, Kim SW, Han SS, et al. High incidence of extrapancreatic neoplasms in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Arch Surg 2006; 141:51.
  60. Yoon WJ, Ryu JK, Lee JK, et al. Extrapancreatic malignancies in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: prevalence, associated factors, and comparison with patients with other pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15:3193.
  61. Reid-Lombardo KM, Mathis KL, Wood CM, et al. Frequency of extrapancreatic neoplasms in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: implications for management. Ann Surg 2010; 251:64.
  62. Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Egawa N, et al. Malignancies associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11:5688.
  63. Eguchi H, Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, et al. Patients with pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are at high risk of colorectal cancer development. Surgery 2006; 139:749.
  64. Larghi A, Panic N, Capurso G, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of extrapancreatic malignancies in a large cohort of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:1907.
  65. Marchegiani G, Malleo G, D'Haese JG, et al. Association between pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and extrapancreatic malignancies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13:1162.
  66. Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Ramai D, et al. Association between pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and extrapancreatic malignancies: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:632.
Topic 5632 Version 29.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟