ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Evaluation of proteinuria in children

Evaluation of proteinuria in children
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Apr 30, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Proteinuria as a marker of kidney disease has been well established. The dilemma that faces the primary care clinician is to differentiate the child with transient or other benign forms of proteinuria from the child with proteinuria from kidney disease.

An overview of the evaluation of proteinuria in children will be presented here. Some related issues, including the mechanisms of proteinuria, are discussed in more detail elsewhere. (See "Assessment of urinary protein excretion and evaluation of isolated non-nephrotic proteinuria in adults".)

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION

Normal protein excretion — Urinary protein excretion in the normal child is less than 100 mg/m2 per day or a total of 150 mg per day. In neonates, normal urinary protein excretion is higher, up to 300 mg/m2, because of reduced reabsorption of filtered proteins.

Approximately one-half of normal protein excretion consists of proteins secreted by tubular epithelium, mostly Tamm-Horsfall protein (uromodulin). The other half consists of plasma proteins including albumin, which accounts for approximately 40 percent of the total urinary protein, and low molecular weight (LMW) proteins, such as beta-2 microglobulin and amino acids.

The normally low rate of urinary protein excretion is due to two factors:

Restriction of the filtration of proteins across the glomerular capillary wall

Reabsorption of freely filtered LMW proteins (less than 25,000 Daltons) by the proximal tubule

Abnormal protein excretion — Urinary protein excretion in excess of 100 mg/m2 per day or 4 mg/m2 per hour is considered abnormal in children. Nephrotic range proteinuria (heavy proteinuria) is defined as ≥1000 mg/m2 per day or 40 mg/m2 per hour.

There are three main mechanisms of increased protein excretion: glomerular, tubular, and overflow proteinuria. (See "Assessment of urinary protein excretion and evaluation of isolated non-nephrotic proteinuria in adults".)

Glomerular proteinuria — Glomerular proteinuria is due to increased filtration of macromolecules (particularly albumin) across the glomerular capillary wall. This may arise because of anatomical or functional lesions.

Glomerular proteinurias are a common cause of proteinuria in children. They may result from glomerular disease (most often minimal change disease [MCD]) or from nonpathologic conditions such as fever, intensive exercise, and orthostatic (or postural) proteinuria, in which protein excretion is increased only in the upright position.

Tubular proteinuria — Tubular proteinuria, which is less frequent, results from increased excretion of LMW proteins such as beta-2-microglobulin, alpha-1-microglobulin, and retinol-binding protein. These molecules are normally filtered across the glomerulus and then largely reabsorbed in the proximal tubule. Interference with proximal tubular reabsorption, due to a variety of tubulointerstitial diseases, can lead to increased excretion of these smaller proteins.

Tubular proteinuria often is associated with other defects in proximal tubular function, including glycosuria, proximal renal tubular acidosis with bicarbonate wasting, and phosphaturia. In Fanconi's syndrome, all four of these proximal tubular defects occur.

As will be described below, only albumin is detected by the urine dipstick, while tubular proteinuria is not detected by screening dipstick urinalysis.

Overflow proteinuria — Overflow proteinuria results from increased excretion of low molecular weight proteins due to marked overproduction of a particular protein to a level that exceeds tubular reabsorptive capacity. Overflow proteinuria is rarely observed in children; it is primarily observed in adults with a plasma cell dyscrasia (eg, multiple myeloma) who overproduce immunoglobulin light chains.

As with tubular proteinuria, overflow proteinuria with low molecular proteins will not be detected by screening dipstick urinalysis.

MEASUREMENT OF URINARY PROTEIN — There are several tests available for the measurement of urinary protein. The most common test, the urine dipstick, and other tests such as the sulfosalicylic acid (SSA) test that detects all proteins, measure only the urine protein concentration and cannot be used to quantify protein excretion. A dilute urine, for example, will underestimate the degree of proteinuria, while a highly concentrated urine may have a protein concentration greater than 100 mg/dL, but not be indicative of increased protein excretion.

Urine dipstick — The urine dipstick measures albumin concentration via a colorimetric reaction between albumin and tetrabromophenol blue producing different shades of green according to the concentration of albumin in the sample.

Negative

Trace – between 15 and 30 mg/dL

1+ – between 30 and 100 mg/dL

2+ – between 100 and 300 mg/dL

3+ – between 300 and 1000 mg/dL

4+ – >1000 mg/dL

Dipstick testing will not detect low molecular weight (LMW) proteins. False-positive results may be obtained in samples that are very alkaline, or contaminated by antiseptic agents (such as chlorhexidine or benzalkonium chloride) or iodinated radiocontrast agents [1]. Thus, the urine should not be tested for protein with the dipstick for at least 24 hours after a contrast study.

Sulfosalicylic acid test — In contrast to the urine dipstick, sulfosalicylic acid (SSA) detects all proteins in the urine including the LMW proteins that are not detected by the dipstick [2]. The SSA test is performed by mixing one part urine supernatant (eg, 2.5 mL) with three parts 3 percent SSA, followed by assessment of the degree of turbidity. This test is infrequently necessary in children.

Quantitative assessment — Children with persistent dipstick-positive proteinuria must undergo a quantitative measurement of protein excretion. We quantify protein excretion by calculating the total urine protein/creatinine (Pr/Cr) ratio on a spot urine sample, ideally using the first morning urine (calculator 1). We prefer using the Pr/Cr ratio to a 24-hour urine collection because it is easier to obtain in children and it correlates well with the 24-hour values. In particular, it is difficult to obtain accurately time urine collection in young children and infants who are not toilet trained.

Spot urine sample — The quantitative assessment is measurement of the total protein/creatinine ratio (Pr/Cr) on a spot urine sample, preferably performed on a first morning specimen (calculator 1). The normal value for this ratio is <0.2 mg protein/mg creatinine (<20 mg protein/mmol creatinine) in children greater than two years of age and <0.5 mg protein/mg creatinine (<50 mg protein/mmol creatinine) in infants and toddlers from 6 to 24 months [3-5].

Of note, spot urine protein to creatinine ratio will overestimate the actual protein excretion in very dilute urine (ie, urine Cr <38.8 mg/dL [3.43 mmol/L]) or underestimate protein excretion for a concentrated sample (ie, urine Cr >61.5 mg/dL [5.44 mmol/L]) [6]. Ongoing efforts are needed to enhance the accuracy of a spot urine sample to as urinary protein excretion.

Timed 24-hour urine collection — In children (except neonates), levels of urinary protein excretion higher than 100 mg/m2 per day (or 4 mg/m2 per hour) are abnormal. Proteinuria of greater than 40 mg/m2 per hour is considered heavy or in the nephrotic range.

Qualitative assessment — A qualitative analysis of urinary proteins may be necessary to differentiate glomerular from tubular proteinuria. A selective measurement, by immunonephelometry of marker proteins that include beta-2 microglobulin, alpha-1-microglobulin, lysozyme, and retinol-binding protein can distinguish glomerular from tubular proteinuria. In tubular proteinuria, these levels will be 10 to 100 times higher than normal.

APPROACH TO THE CHILD WITH PROTEINURIA — A positive dipstick for protein on a random urinalysis is common in children. General screening of normal school-age children and adolescents with a urine dipstick will be positive (defined as ≥1+) in 5 to 10 percent. However, only 0.1 percent of children have persistent proteinuria [7]. It is this small subset of children who are at the highest risk for kidney disease.

Proteinuria in children presents in three ways: transient or intermittent; orthostatic; and persistent (table 1). Transient and orthostatic proteinuria are benign conditions that require no further evaluation:

Transient proteinuria is the most common cause. It can be induced by a variety of factors including fever, exercise, stress, seizures, and hypovolemia.

Orthostatic (or postural) proteinuria is defined as increased protein excretion in the upright position which returns to normal when the patient is recumbent. It is a common cause of proteinuria, especially in adolescent males [8]. Long-term studies have documented the benign nature of this condition, with recorded normal kidney function up to 50 years later [9]. The "nutcracker syndrome" (left renal vein entrapment), demonstrated by ultrasonic imaging and Doppler flow scanning, appears to be a common cause of postural proteinuria (image 1 and image 2). The diagnosis is established by a negative dipstick on the first morning voided specimen. (See "Orthostatic (postural) proteinuria".)

Persistent proteinuria should be more fully evaluated for underlying kidney disease.

History and physical examination — The evaluation begins with a thorough history and physical examination to determine the type of proteinuria. A urine sample collected during a febrile illness or after intensive physical exercise or a seizure suggests the possible presence of transient proteinuria. Other findings suggest underlying kidney disease and persistent proteinuria; these include a change in urine volume or color, evidence of edema or increased blood pressure, recent streptococcal infection, a positive family history for kidney disease, and hearing loss, which is most suggestive of Alport disease. (See "Genetics, pathogenesis, and pathology of Alport syndrome (hereditary nephritis)".)

Asymptomatic child — The diagnostic evaluation of the child with dipstick-positive proteinuria depends in part upon the presence or absence of symptoms. The following approach is consistent with the recommendations of the 2000 Pediatric Nephrology panel established at the National Kidney Foundation conference on Proteinuria, Albuminuria, Risk, Assessment, Detection, and Elimination (PARADE) (algorithm 1) [2].

In the asymptomatic child with an incidentally discovered positive dipstick for proteinuria, the first step is to repeat the test, since, as mentioned above, the great majority of such episodes are transient and do not reflect any kidney disease [7]. The simplest approach is to measure the protein/creatinine (Pr/Cr) ratio on a first morning void obtained at home, and to send for urinalysis a second specimen obtained in the office. The parents/caregivers should be instructed to have the child void before going to bed and to remain recumbent until the first morning sample is obtained. (See 'Measurement of urinary protein' above.)

The following findings may be obtained:

A normal Pr/Cr ratio on the first morning void and a normal urinalysis indicate transient proteinuria. These patients should have a repeat urinalysis on a first morning void in one year to ensure that proteinuria does not recur.

A normal Pr/Cr ratio on the first morning void and dipstick-positive proteinuria on the second upright specimen indicate orthostatic proteinuria (see "Orthostatic (postural) proteinuria"). These patients should have a repeat urinalysis on a first morning void in one year to ensure that nonorthostatic proteinuria does not occur.

An elevated Pr/Cr ratio on the first morning void and a positive dipstick on the second specimen indicate persistent proteinuria that requires further evaluation, beginning with examination of the urine sediment, looking for other signs of glomerular and/or parenchymal disease such as hematuria, red cell casts (picture 1), pyuria, and/or lipiduria. Red cell casts are pathognomonic for the presence of glomerulonephritis. Based upon the particular findings, certain patterns on the urinalysis are suggestive of glomerulonephritis, nephrotic syndrome, or other renal parenchymal disorders. (See "Glomerular disease: Evaluation in children" and "Overview of the pathogenesis and causes of glomerulonephritis in children".)

The urinalysis may also be suggestive of a urinary tract infection (UTI) with pyuria, bacteriuria, and positive nitrites or leukocyte esterase along with mild proteinuria. Proteinuria in such children typically resolves with successful treatment of the infection. If the proteinuria persists after eradication of the infection, further work-up is indicated. (See "Urinary tract infections in infants and children older than one month: Clinical features and diagnosis".)

Among children with persistent proteinuria, a complete history and physical examination should be reviewed, including measurement of the blood pressure, as elevated hypertension may be indicative of underlying kidney disease.

Initial laboratory evaluation includes kidney function tests (blood urea nitrogen and creatinine), serum electrolytes, cholesterol, albumin, and total protein.

Other tests should be considered based on the clinical setting:

Suspected poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis following an antecedent streptococcal infection and evidence of glomerular disease (eg, hypertension, hematuria, and in some cases proteinuria) (see "Poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis", section on 'Laboratory findings').

Serum levels of C3 are low

Streptozyme testing is positive

Suspected lupus nephritis with evidence of extrarenal findings (eg rash, hematologic abnormalities, joint symptoms) (see "Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): Clinical manifestations and diagnosis", section on 'Laboratory findings').

Serum levels of C3 and C4 may be low

Antinuclear antibody (ANA)

Patients with evidence of liver disease – Hepatitis B and C serology.

History of exposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) – HIV testing (see "Screening and diagnostic testing for HIV infection").

Kidney ultrasound should be considered if there is evidence of renal parenchymal damage (eg, scarring) or congenital abnormality (eg, hypertension, impaired kidney function, history of chronic UTI). A voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) should be considered if there is an abnormal ultrasound with scarring or a history of febrile UTIs. (See "Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and course of primary vesicoureteral reflux".)

If this initial evaluation is normal, the urine dipstick should be repeated on at least two additional specimens. If these subsequent tests are negative for protein, the diagnosis is transient proteinuria.

If the proteinuria persists or if any of the studies are abnormal, the patient should be referred to a pediatric nephrologist. At this point, urinary protein excretion should be quantified by a timed collection, if obtainable. A detailed family history should be obtained and the parents should be screened by urinary dipstick to search for hereditary glomerular disorders. Nephrotic range proteinuria has been reported in some children with generalized proximal tubular dysfunction (referred to as Fanconi syndrome), which is characterized by tubular proteinuria, hypophosphatemia, renal glucosuria, aminoaciduria, and renal tubular acidosis [10]. (See "Glomerular disease: Evaluation in children" and "Etiology and clinical manifestations of renal tubular acidosis in infants and children", section on 'Fanconi syndrome'.)

Indications for kidney biopsy — The role of kidney biopsy in a child with isolated asymptomatic persistent proteinuria is controversial [2]. Many nephrologists recommend close monitoring for those children with urinary protein excretion below 500 mg/m2 per day before considering a biopsy. Monitoring should include assessment of blood pressure, protein excretion, and kidney function. If any of these parameters shows evidence of progressive disease, a kidney biopsy should be performed to establish a diagnosis.

There are limited data on the results of kidney biopsy in such children.

In a retrospective review of 53 Japanese children with persistent isolated proteinuria who underwent kidney biopsy from 1976 to 1989, a significant glomerular disease was present in almost half of the patients (n = 25). 15 had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS); four had IgA nephropathy, and three each had membranous nephropathy and diffuse mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis without immunoglobulin A (IgA) deposition [11].

In a subsequent case series from the same institution, 52 children with asymptomatic persistent proteinuria underwent kidney biopsy from 2000 to 2010 [12]. The 29 patients with a urine Pr/Cr ≥0.5 mg/mg were more likely to have significant glomerular findings that included five with FSGS, and seven with IgA nephropathy. The remaining 17 patients had minor glomerular changes. In contrast, only one of the 15 patients with a urine Pr/Cr <0.5 mg/mg had FSGS, and the rest had minor glomerular changes. The authors of the study suggest that a kidney biopsy should be considered in asymptomatic children with constant isolated proteinuria with a urine Pr/Cr ≥0.5 mg/mg.

In a report of 461 Korean children with an abnormal urinalysis detected by school screening, only nine patients had isolated persistent proteinuria with protein excretion ≥2 g in a 24-hour collection [13]. Kidney biopsy demonstrated changes consistent with minimal change disease (MCD) in seven patients, and one case each of mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis and membranous glomerulopathy.

Symptomatic child — Clinical manifestations in the symptomatic child with proteinuria may be general and nonspecific (eg, fever, malaise, weight loss), nonurinary specific (eg, rash, purpura, arthritis), or urinary specific (eg, edema, hypertension, kidney insufficiency). The underlying disorder may be primarily renal in origin or secondary to a systemic process. Diagnostic categories include infections, rheumatologic and immunologic disorders, and primary and secondary glomerular and interstitial diseases of the kidney.

The diagnosis may be evident and straightforward from the history and physical examination, including blood pressure measurement, or it may be more complicated, with a need for early referral to a nephrologist. Initial laboratory evaluation includes kidney function tests (blood urea nitrogen and creatinine), serum electrolytes, cholesterol, albumin, and total protein. The practitioner must ensure that children with significant disease are clearly identified.

Children with heavy proteinuria and periorbital or peripheral edema must be evaluated promptly for nephrotic syndrome. The major manifestations of nephrotic syndrome are heavy proteinuria (protein excretion >1000 mg/m2 per day or spot urine Pr/Cr ratio >1), edema, serum albumin <2.5 g/dL, and hypercholesterolemia. Almost all such children have idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, and management decisions should be made in consultation with a pediatric nephrologist. (See "Treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children".)

Non-nephrotic children with persistent proteinuria who present with hypertension, an abnormal urinalysis, or an elevated plasma creatinine concentration should be referred to a pediatric nephrologist for further evaluation and possible kidney biopsy. (See "Glomerular disease: Evaluation and differential diagnosis in adults".)

In patients with a history of febrile UTIs, kidney ultrasound should be obtained to determine if there is evidence of renal scarring. A VCUG should be considered if there is concern for vesicoureteral reflux. (See "Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and course of primary vesicoureteral reflux".)

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Proteinuria in children".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Pathophysiology and classification – Urinary protein excretion >100 mg/m2 per day or 4 mg/m2 per hour is considered abnormal in children. Nephrotic range proteinuria (heavy proteinuria) is defined as ≥1000 mg/m2 per day or 40 mg/m2 per hour, and is always indicative of kidney disease. The three main mechanisms of increased protein excretion are increased protein filtration due to glomerular disease, overflow proteinuria due to increased excretion of low molecular weight (LMW) proteins, and decreased tubular reabsorption. (See 'Pathophysiology and classification' above.)

Measurement of urinary protein

Urine dipstick – The most common screening test for proteinuria is urine dipstick test that measures albumin concentration via a colorimetric reaction. It cannot be used to quantify protein excretion, and it does not detect LMW proteins. (See 'Urine dipstick' above.)

Quantitative measurement – Children with persistent dipstick-positive proteinuria must undergo a quantitative assessment of protein excretion. We quantify protein excretion by calculating the total urine protein/creatinine (Pr/Cr) ratio on a spot urine sample, ideally using the first morning urine. We prefer using the Pr/Cr ratio to a 24-hour urine collection because it is easier to obtain in children and it correlates well with the 24-hour values (calculator 1). (See 'Quantitative assessment' above.)

Causes of proteinuria in children – Both benign and serious conditions can cause proteinuria in children. Childhood proteinuria presents in three ways: transient or intermittent, orthostatic, and persistent (table 1). Transient and orthostatic proteinuria are benign conditions that require no further evaluation. General screening of normal school-age children and adolescents with a urine dipstick will be positive (defined as ≥1+) in 5 to 10 percent. However, only 0.1 percent of children have persistent proteinuria. It is this small subset of children who are at the highest risk for kidney disease. (See 'Approach to the child with proteinuria' above.)

Evaluation of persistent proteinuria in children – The evaluation of a child with persistent proteinuria begins with a thorough history and physical examination. Further evaluation is based on the clinical manifestations elicited by the history and physical examination. (See 'Approach to the child with proteinuria' above.)

Asymptomatic child – In the asymptomatic child, repeat testing for proteinuria is generally performed to determine whether the proteinuria is transient, orthostatic, or persistent (algorithm 1). In patients with transient or orthostatic proteinuria, a repeat urinalysis on a first morning void should be obtained in one year. Further work-up is warranted in children with persistent proteinuria including kidney function tests, and serum electrolytes, cholesterol, albumin, and total protein. (See 'Asymptomatic child' above.)

Symptomatic child – The evaluation is based on the clinical manifestations that may be general and nonspecific (eg, fever, malaise, weight loss), nonurinary specific (eg, rash, purpura, arthritis), or urinary specific (eg, edema, hypertension, renal insufficiency). In some cases, the diagnosis is evident based on the clinical findings, whereas it may be more subtle and complicated in others, requiring further testing or referral to a pediatric nephrologist. (See 'Symptomatic child' above.)

  1. Morcos SK, el-Nahas AM, Brown P, Haylor J. Effect of iodinated water soluble contrast media on urinary protein assays. BMJ 1992; 305:29.
  2. Hogg RJ, Portman RJ, Milliner D, et al. Evaluation and management of proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome in children: recommendations from a pediatric nephrology panel established at the National Kidney Foundation conference on proteinuria, albuminuria, risk, assessment, detection, and elimination (PARADE). Pediatrics 2000; 105:1242.
  3. Houser M. Assessment of proteinuria using random urine samples. J Pediatr 1984; 104:845.
  4. Houser MT, Jahn MF, Kobayashi A, Walburn J. Assessment of urinary protein excretion in the adolescent: effect of body position and exercise. J Pediatr 1986; 109:556.
  5. Huang Y, Yang X, Zhang Y, et al. Correlation of urine protein/creatinine ratios to 24-h urinary protein for quantitating proteinuria in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2020; 35:463.
  6. Yang CY, Chen FA, Chen CF, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio Is Influenced by Urine Concentration. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0137460.
  7. Vehaskari VM, Rapola J. Isolated proteinuria: analysis of a school-age population. J Pediatr 1982; 101:661.
  8. Brandt JR, Jacobs A, Raissy HH, et al. Orthostatic proteinuria and the spectrum of diurnal variability of urinary protein excretion in healthy children. Pediatr Nephrol 2010; 25:1131.
  9. Rytand DA, Spreiter S. Prognosis in postural (orthostatic) proteinuria: forty to fifty-year follow-up of six patients after diagnosis by Thomas Addis. N Engl J Med 1981; 305:618.
  10. Blanchard A, Curis E, Guyon-Roger T, et al. Observations of a large Dent disease cohort. Kidney Int 2016; 90:430.
  11. Yoshikawa N, Kitagawa K, Ohta K, et al. Asymptomatic constant isolated proteinuria in children. J Pediatr 1991; 119:375.
  12. Hama T, Nakanishi K, Shima Y, et al. Renal biopsy criterion in children with asymptomatic constant isolated proteinuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012; 27:3186.
  13. Lee YM, Baek SY, Kim JH, et al. Analysis of renal biopsies performed in children with abnormal findings in urinary mass screening. Acta Paediatr 2006; 95:849.
Topic 6091 Version 27.0

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟