ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Epidemiology, risk factors, anatomy, and pathology of cholangiocarcinoma

Epidemiology, risk factors, anatomy, and pathology of cholangiocarcinoma
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Jan 31, 2024.

INTRODUCTION — Cholangiocarcinomas (bile duct cancers) arise from the epithelial cells of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. Although these cancers are rare in the United States, they are highly lethal because most are locally advanced at presentation.

The epidemiology, pathology, pathogenesis, and classification of cholangiocarcinoma will be discussed here. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment are reviewed separately. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma" and "Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for localized cholangiocarcinoma" and "Treatment options for locally advanced, unresectable, but nonmetastatic cholangiocarcinoma" and "Systemic therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma".)

Cancers of the gallbladder and ampulla of Vater are discussed as separate disease processes, although these structures are part of the biliary drainage system. (See "Gallbladder cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and diagnosis" and "Ampullary carcinoma: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and staging".)

ANATOMY, TUMOR CLASSIFICATION, AND STAGING — Biliary tract cancers were traditionally divided according to their anatomical primary site into cancers of the gallbladder, the extrahepatic ducts, and the ampulla of Vater, while intrahepatic tumors of the bile system were classified as primary liver cancers. More recently, the term cholangiocarcinoma has been used to refer to bile duct cancers arising in the intrahepatic, perihilar, or distal (extrahepatic) biliary tree, exclusive of the gallbladder or ampulla of Vater.

Anatomically, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas originate from small intrahepatic ductules (termed peripheral cholangiocarcinomas) or large intrahepatic ducts proximal to the bifurcation of the right and left hepatic ducts. The extrahepatic bile ducts are divided into perihilar (including the confluence itself) and distal segments, with the transition occurring at the point where the common bile duct lies posterior to the duodenum, proximal to the insertion of the cystic duct into the common bile duct (figure 1) [1].

In general, perihilar disease represents approximately 50 percent; distal disease, 40 percent; and intrahepatic disease, less than 10 percent of cholangiocarcinoma cases [2].

Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar tumors — Cancers arising in the perihilar region have been further classified according to their patterns of involvement of the hepatic ducts (the Bismuth-Corlette classification) (figure 2) [3]:

Tumors below the confluence of the left and right hepatic ducts (Type I)

Tumors reaching the confluence (Type II)

Tumors occluding the common hepatic duct and either the right or left hepatic duct (Types IIIa and IIIb, respectively)

Tumors that are multicentric, or that involve the confluence and both the right or left hepatic duct (Type IV)

Bile duct tumors that involve the common hepatic duct bifurcation are referred to as Klatskin tumors or hilar cholangiocarcinoma regardless of whether they arise from the intrahepatic or extrahepatic portion of the biliary tree [3]. Perihilar tumors account for approximately 50 percent of all cholangiocarcinomas, while approximately 40 percent are distal extrahepatic tumors, and 10 percent or fewer are intrahepatic [2].

TNM staging classifications — The newest version of the combined American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) cancer staging manual provides separate staging systems for cancers of the perihilar (table 1), distal (table 2), and intrahepatic bile ducts (table 3), which all differ in their definitions of tumor (T) stage and in their prognostic stage groupings. The rare combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinomas (mixed hepatocholangiocarcinomas) are included in the intrahepatic bile duct classification. (See 'Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma' below.)

There are major changes for all three sites compared with the seventh (2010) edition of the AJCC staging manual:

For distal bile duct tumors, regional nodal (N) staging has been expanded according to the number of involved nodes, rather than just their presence or absence, and T staging now depends on the depth, in millimeters, of tumor invasion into the bile duct wall (table 2) [4].

For perihilar tumors, the N category has been reclassified based upon the number of involved lymph nodes, instead of the location of the involved nodes, and Bismuth-Corlette type IV tumors have been removed from the T4 category; in addition, the prognostic stage groups have been changed (table 1) [1].

For intrahepatic tumors, there are no changes to the N categories (nodal involvement [N1] versus no nodal involvement [N0]), but the T1 category has been split to reflect the prognostic importance of tumor size, and the T2 category is modified to reflect the equivalent prognostic value of vascular invasion and tumor multifocality (table 3) [5].

These prominent changes in the staging classification of bile duct cancers over time have improved the prognostic stratification of the Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system. As examples:

Stratification of survival according to the newest 2017 T stage designations for distal cholangiocarcinomas (which are now based upon depth of tumor invasion rather than what structures were invaded) is provided in the figure (figure 3) [4,6], while stratified survival according to N category is depicted in this figure (figure 4) [4].

Survival stratified according to the new prognostic stage groupings for tumors of the perihilar bile ducts is provided in a separate figure (figure 5) [1], as is survival stratified according to T stage for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (figure 6) [5].

A comparison of five-year survival stratified by stage groupings according to the 2010 and 2017 editions of the AJCC staging classification for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a series of 1154 patients undergoing potentially curative resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at 14 major hepatobiliary centers is provided in the table (table 4) [7].

The continued evolution of the staging classification for bile duct cancers at all sites has obvious implications for interpretation and comparison of outcomes from trials and retrospective series that use older TNM staging criteria.

A criticism of the TNM staging system is that vessel invasion, as detected on the final pathology specimen, affects T stage category, but it is not used to assess local resectability. As such, the stage groupings do not serve as a guide for choosing local therapy. A modification to the tumor staging system for perihilar tumors has been proposed that incorporates the Bismuth-Corlette classification and a more detailed assessment of major vascular invasion, as well as liver remnant volume and underlying liver disease [8].

EPIDEMIOLOGY — Cholangiocarcinomas account for approximately 3 percent of all gastrointestinal malignancies, with a prevalence in autopsy studies of 0.01 to 0.46 percent [9].

United States

Incidence data from the American Cancer Society are difficult to interpret because intrahepatic bile duct cancers have been included with primary liver cancers, while extrahepatic biliary cancers are in a separate category that includes gallbladder cancer:

-In the United States, approximately 41,000 cases of primary liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancers are diagnosed annually [10]. Data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program suggest that approximately 15 percent of these are intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas [11,12].

-Approximately 12,000 cases of extrahepatic biliary tract cancers are diagnosed annually in the United States [10], two-thirds of which are gallbladder cancers. The remainder, approximately 3000 cases per year, are extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.

Data from an analysis of the United States SEER database from 2001 to 2015 suggest an incidence of 1.26 cases of cholangiocarcinoma per 100,000 people per year, and that two-thirds of cases are intrahepatic [13].

Internationally – Internationally, the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma varies significantly. While the incidence is low in high-income countries (from 0.35 to 2 cases per 100,000 population per year), in endemic regions of Thailand and China, the incidence is up to 40-fold higher [14-16].

Globally, the burden of gallbladder and other biliary tract cancers has risen over the last 30 years [17]. In particular, the incidence and mortality of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has been rising over the past four decades in most countries [11,12,14,18-25] (although not Denmark [18]). Rates of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had been declining internationally up to approximately the year 2000 [11,12,18-23], but more recent reports suggest an increased incidence over the last 20 years [24].

Some of these apparent differences may be due to changes in ICD (International Classification of Disease) classification [26]. Klatskin tumors often invade the liver by the time of presentation which may result in some extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas misclassified as intrahepatic in origin, thereby contributing to possible underestimation of the incidence of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. In addition, at least some of the increase in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas may be attributable to new diagnostic methods for obstructive jaundice that identify biliary malignancies that previously might have gone undiagnosed [27]. However, the rising rates of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have not been associated with an increase in the proportion of early stage or smaller size lesions [12]. Furthermore, incidence rates do not seem to be plateauing.

Other studies suggest that the increasing incidence of cholangiocarcinoma may be related to a concomitant increase in certain risk factors such as cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, and hepatitis C virus infection [24,28]. (See 'Risk factors' below.)

As a general rule, the incidence of biliary tract cancers increases with age [29]; the typical patient with cholangiocarcinoma is between 50 and 70 years of age. However, patients with cholangiocarcinomas arising in the setting of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and those with choledochal cysts present nearly two decades earlier [9,30]. In contrast to gallbladder cancer, where female gender predominates, the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma is slightly higher in men [29]. This probably reflects the higher incidence of PSC in men [31]. (See "Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Epidemiology and pathogenesis".)

RISK FACTORS — A number of risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma have been recognized, although a specific risk factor cannot be identified for many patients [32]. In the United States and Europe, the main risk factors are primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and fibropolycystic liver disease (eg, choledochal cysts). There is a clear and strong association between chronic intrahepatic stone disease (hepatolithiasis, also called recurrent pyogenic cholangitis) and cholangiocarcinoma [33]. Chronic liver disease (cirrhosis and viral infection) is now recognized as a risk factor, particularly for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [33]. (See 'Primary hepatobiliary disease' below.)

In certain regions (eg, Thailand) chronic infection with liver fluke is the driving risk factor. (See 'Parasitic infection' below.)

Finally, at least four genetic conditions, Lynch syndrome, BRCA-associated protein-1 (BAP1) tumor predisposition syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and biliary papillomatosis, appear to increase the risk for cholangiocarcinoma. (See 'Genetic disorders' below.)

Primary hepatobiliary disease

Primary sclerosing cholangitis — PSC is an inflammatory disorder of the biliary tree that leads to fibrosis and stricturing of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. PSC is strongly associated with inflammatory bowel disease, notably ulcerative colitis (UC); approximately 40 to 50 percent of patients have symptomatic colitis, while the incidence of colitis is around 90 percent in patients with PSC [34]. (See "Primary sclerosing cholangitis: Epidemiology and pathogenesis".)

There is a well-established association between PSC and cholangiocarcinoma, especially perihilar disease. Nearly 30 percent of cholangiocarcinomas are diagnosed in patients with PSC, with or without UC. The annual incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC has been estimated to be between 0.6 and 1.5 percent per year, with a lifetime risk of 5 to 15 percent [35-41]. However, the incidence is much higher (30 percent or more) in autopsy series [42]. Cholangiocarcinomas develop at a significantly younger age (between the ages of 30 and 50) in patients with PSC than in those without this condition. It is also more difficult to diagnose because of the diffusely abnormal biliary tree [43]. Over one-third of cases are diagnosed within two years of the initial diagnosis of PSC, and the risk appears unrelated to the duration of the inflammatory disease [30,37,42]. However, a population-based patient series from the Netherlands has questioned previous notions that late presentation of cholangiocarcinoma is a rare event, reporting that 37 percent of cholangiocarcinomas present more than 10 years after the diagnosis of PSC [44]. Thus, clinical and biochemical deterioration at any point in the disease course should prompt evaluation for a potentially malignant cause. (See "Primary sclerosing cholangitis in adults: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis" and "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma", section on 'When to consider cholangiocarcinoma'.)

The reason why patients with PSC develop cholangiocarcinoma is not well understood, although there have been several observations.

One case-control study attempted to identify specific risk factors by comparing 20 patients with PSC and hepatobiliary carcinoma (17 of whom had cholangiocarcinoma) with 20 age- and sex-matched patients with PSC without cancer [37]. No clinical or biochemical risk factors for the development of cancer could be identified in the year before cancer diagnosis. However, the number of patients who smoked or were former smokers was significantly higher in the cancer group.

Alcohol consumption has been suggested to be a risk factor for the development of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC [37]. One study compared 26 patients with PSC and cholangiocarcinoma with 87 patients with PSC but without tumors [45]. Only alcohol consumption was significantly associated with the development of cancer (odds ratio [OR] of 2.95; 95% CI 1.04-8.3). However, these authors could not test for a dose-response relationship due to inadequate data, and they could not confirm the link between smoking and cholangiocarcinoma in PSC.

Certain genetic polymorphisms have been implicated as risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in PSC [46].

The development of cholangiocarcinoma is heralded by rapid clinical deterioration with jaundice, weight loss, and abdominal discomfort; tumors are often detected at an advanced stage. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma", section on 'When to consider cholangiocarcinoma'.)

Issues related to cancer screening, typically by serial assay of the tumor marker carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, in patients with PSC are discussed elsewhere. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma", section on 'CA 19-9' and "Primary sclerosing cholangitis in adults: Management", section on 'Cancer screening'.)

Fibropolycystic liver disease — Congenital abnormalities of the biliary tree (Caroli syndrome, congenital hepatic fibrosis, choledochal cysts) carry an approximately 15 percent risk of malignant change in the adult years (average age at diagnosis 34) [47-49]. (See "Biliary cysts" and "Caroli disease".)

Choledochal cysts are congenital cystic dilatations of the bile ducts, while Caroli disease is a variant of choledochal cyst disease that is characterized by multiple cystic dilations of the intrahepatic biliary ducts [50]. The overall incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with untreated cysts is as high as 28 percent [48,49].

Although the mechanism underlying carcinogenesis in these patients is unclear, it could be related to biliary stasis, chronic inflammation from reflux of pancreatic juice, or abnormalities in bile salt transporter proteins that result in unstable bile content, or deconjugation of carcinogens that were previously conjugated in the liver [47].

Cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and hepatolithiasis — While cholelithiasis is a well-described strong risk factor for gallbladder cancer, the association between gallstones and cholangiocarcinoma is less well established. However, at least four epidemiologic studies note an increased risk for cholangiocarcinoma among patients with symptomatic gallstone disease or cholecystitis, but of a lower magnitude than for gallbladder cancer [51-54]. (See "Gallbladder cancer: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and diagnosis", section on 'Gallstone disease'.)

There is a clear and strong association between chronic intrahepatic stone disease (hepatolithiasis, also called recurrent pyogenic cholangitis) and cholangiocarcinoma [55-62]. Stone disease affecting only the intrahepatic bile ducts is exceedingly rare in the West but is endemic in certain parts of Southeast Asia. In Taiwan, 50 to 70 percent of patients undergoing resection for cholangiocarcinoma have associated hepatolithiasis [57,58], while in Japan, the incidence is much lower (6 to 18 percent) [59-61]. (See "Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis".)

The etiology of hepatolithiasis is not known, but congenital ductal abnormalities, diet, and chronic inflammation from bacterial or parasitic infections have all been implicated. The calculi are usually composed of calcium bilirubinate (brown pigment stones) rather than cholesterol. The biliary stones are thought to cause bile stasis, predisposing to recurrent bacterial infections and chronic inflammation.

It may be difficult to identify cholangiocarcinomas arising as a complication of hepatolithiasis. However, the diagnosis should be suspected in a patient over the age of 40 who has a long history of hepatolithiasis, weight loss, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase, a serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level above 4.2 ng/mL, and hepatolithiasis in either the right or both lobes of the liver [63].

Chronic liver disease — Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), as well as liver cirrhosis regardless of etiology, have been examined as risk factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [28,62,64-66].

Viral hepatitis — An association between HCV infection and cholangiocarcinoma was initially suggested in 1991 [67]. Since then, several reports have noted a higher than expected rate of HCV-associated cirrhosis in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, although the risk is much lower than for hepatocellular cancer [12,28,65,68-78]:

A prospective case control study from Japan reported the risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma in patients with cirrhosis related to HCV was 3.5 percent at 10 years [65].

A large cohort study in the United States found a significant association between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and HCV after adjustment for potential confounders, including cirrhosis (adjusted relative risk [RR] 2.55, 95% CI 1.31-4.95) [77].

Similarly, a large cohort study of older United States adults derived from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database found that HCV positivity was associated with a significant increase in the risk of both extrahepatic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90, 95% CI 1.41-2.57) and intrahepatic (aOR 3.40, 95% CI 2.52-4.58) cholangiocarcinomas [78].

An association between HBV infection and cholangiocarcinoma has also been suggested, although the data are less compelling than for HCV [62,74,79,80].

Nonviral chronic liver disease — As with hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic liver disease of nonviral etiology also appears to be associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [12,28,62,64-66,68,81]. In a case-control study, risk factors that were significantly more prevalent among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma included nonspecific cirrhosis (aOR 27.2) and alcoholic liver disease (aOR 7.4) [28]. A Danish cohort study that followed 11,605 persons with cirrhosis from any cause for an average of approximately six years found a significant 10-fold higher risk for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma among these patients compared with the general population [66].

Precursor (intraductal) lesions — There are three known precursors to invasive cholangiocarcinoma: intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (picture 1) [82,83], the rare intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the bile ducts (picture 2) [83,84], and the much more common biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (picture 3) [85,86]. (See 'Papillary' below and "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia' and "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct' and "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of bile duct'.)

Genetic disorders — At least four genetic disorders are associated with an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma: Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and a rare inherited disorder called multiple biliary papillomatosis.

Lynch syndrome — Patients with Lynch syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder that is caused by a germline mutation in one of several DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, are at risk for colon cancer and a variety of extracolonic cancers, including hepatobiliary neoplasms. (See "Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer): Clinical manifestations and diagnosis", section on 'Extracolonic manifestations'.)

BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome — An increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma has been reported in families that carry germline missense variants of the BRCA-associated protein 1 (BAP1) gene (the clinical phenotype is called "BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome") [87]. In one report of 40 probands, two (5 percent) developed cholangiocarcinoma, compared with none of the 113 ungenotyped relatives. Interestingly, in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), somatic mutations in the BAP1 gene were reported in 11 of 51 cholangiocarcinomas [88], and a putative role for BAP1 as a tumor suppressor gene in cholangiocarcinoma has been suggested [89].

Multiple biliary papillomatosis — Multiple biliary papillomatosis is characterized by multiple adenomatous polyps of variable distribution and extent in the intrahepatic bile ducts, and repeated episodes of abdominal pain, jaundice, and acute cholangitis [90]. Biliary papillomatosis should be considered a premalignant condition and considered for resection since a high proportion of these lesions (83 percent in one study [90]) undergo malignant transformation [91,92].

Cystic fibrosis — Patients with cystic fibrosis have an increased risk of biliary tract cancers. In a meta-analysis, the standardized incidence ratio was 17.87, 95% CI 8.55-37.36, and it was two- to fivefold higher in patients who had undergone lung transplantation compared with those who did not undergo transplantation [93]. (See "Cystic fibrosis: Overview of gastrointestinal disease", section on 'Gastrointestinal cancer'.)

Toxic exposures

Thorotrast – A clear association exists between exposure to Thorotrast (a radiologic contrast agent banned in the 1960s for its carcinogenic properties) and subsequent cholangiocarcinoma; malignancy usually develops 30 to 35 years after exposure [94].

Occupational exposures – An increased incidence of cholangiocarcinoma has been less strongly associated with several occupations, including the auto, rubber, chemical, and wood-finishing industries.

Smoking and alcohol – Individual studies on the association between smoking/alcohol intake and risk of cholangiocarcinoma have been conflicting. A pooled analysis of 26 prospective studies concluded that alcohol consumption was only associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, with an increased risk for individuals consuming five or more versus zero drinks per day (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.46-3.78) [95]. By contrast, ever, former, or current smoking was associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic bile duct and ampulla of Vater cancer, with dose-response effects for duration and intensity of smoking. Current smoking and smoking intensity were also associated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma risk (for >40 cigarettes per day versus never smokers, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.15-4.0).

Iron overload – Increased iron levels (both in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis and nonhemochromatosis populations) increase the risk of primary liver cancer, including cholangiocarcinoma [96,97]. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of hereditary hemochromatosis".)

Infections

Parasitic infection — In Asia (particularly Thailand), infection with liver flukes of the genera Clonorchis and Opisthorchis is associated with cholangiocarcinoma of the intrahepatic bile ducts [64,98,99]. Humans are infected by consuming undercooked fish, with the adult worms inhabiting and laying eggs in the biliary system. These organisms induce a chronic inflammatory state in the proximal biliary tree, presumably leading to malignant transformation of the lining epithelium. Carcinogens that are produced by bacteria in fish and other foods, smoking, alcohol, and HBV infection might also act as cofactors [47,100,101].

HIV infection — HIV infection was an independent risk factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the Medicare population in the case control study described above (aOR 6.4) [28]. However, the validity of the association is uncertain given the relatively small number of cases that were identified and the possibility that at least some of the HIV infected cases may have had coexisting, undiagnosed risk factors (such as HCV infection).

H. pylori infection — Several studies report an association between biliary tract carcinoma and infection with Helicobacter pylori [74,102-105]. Although a cause and effect relationship has not been proven, some have suggested that H. pylori may be involved in the pathogenesis of biliary neoplasms through enhanced biliary cell inflammation and proliferation [104].

Other factors

Elevated blood glucose — An association between diabetes mellitus and cancer of the biliary tract has been suggested in several case-control and cohort studies. In a meta-analysis of 15 such studies, individuals with diabetes had a significantly increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma relative to nondiabetics (summary RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.38-1.87) [106]. The risk was significantly elevated for both intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Whether elevated blood sugar or other diabetes-associated conditions (eg, obesity, hyperlipidemia) represent the true risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma is not clear.

An association between consumption of sweetened beverages (which raises blood glucose concentration) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was suggested in a prospective analysis of 70,832 Swedish adults enrolled in the Swedish Mammography Cohort and Cohort of Swedish Men who were free of cancer and diabetes and who completed a food frequency questionnaire at baseline [107]. Incident cases of biliary tract cancer were ascertained through linkage with the Swedish Cancer Register. With a mean follow-up of over 13 years, after adjustment for other risk factors, women and men in the highest category of combined sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption had a significantly higher risk of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] for two or more 200 mL servings per day of sweetened beverages compared with no consumption was 1.79, 95% CI 1.02-3.13). The corresponding HR for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was 1.69, 95% CI 0.41-7.03.

Obesity — Obesity has been linked to an increased risk for cholangiocarcinoma, particularly intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [68,108].

Metabolic syndrome — A study that included 743 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma found that the presence of metabolic syndrome (defined by the presence of three of the following: elevated waist circumference/central obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, or impaired fasting glucose) was a risk factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (aOR 1.56) [109].

Medications — A few medications have been linked to an increased incidence of cholangiocarcinoma, although causality is not proven.

DPP-4 inhibitors – For adults with type 2 diabetes, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors may increase the risk of cholangiocarcinoma, although data are mixed [110,111]. In a large cohort study with over 600,000 person-years of follow-up, patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with DPP-4 inhibitors had an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma compared with patients receiving other antidiabetic medications (adjusted HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.04-3.01) [110]. An earlier study failed to show such an association [111]. (See "Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus".)

Oral contraceptives – At least one study found that long-term use of oral contraceptives (9+ years) was associated with a significantly increased risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.03-2.55) [112]. Prior data had shown a relationship between exogenous hormone use and an increased risk of all primary liver cancers [113].

HISTOLOGY AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY — Cholangiocarcinomas can be classified according to their location along the biliary tree (figure 1 and figure 2). The majority (75 percent in one report [31]) are found in the upper one-third of the biliary tract, and two-thirds involve the bifurcation of the common hepatic duct (Klatskin tumors). Intrahepatic nonperihilar tumors (ie, peripheral cholangiocarcinomas) are the least common, accounting for fewer than 10 percent of cases in most series. Up to 7 percent of tumors are multicentric at the time of diagnosis [114].

Cholangiocarcinoma — The majority of cholangiocarcinomas (>90 percent) are adenocarcinomas, with squamous cell carcinoma being responsible for most of the remaining cases; adenosquamous cancers are rare. They are graded as well, moderately, or poorly differentiated. Histologic findings and immunohistochemical stains that can assist in the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma from other malignancies, particularly those that arise in liver, are discussed elsewhere. (See "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Cholangiocarcinoma'.)

Intrahepatic adenocarcinomas are divided into large duct type (picture 4) and small duct type (picture 5) [115]. Morphologically, both intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary adenocarcinomas can be sclerosing, nodular, or papillary [115,116].

Sclerosing — Sclerosing (scirrhous) tumors are characterized by an intense desmoplastic reaction. The extensive fibrosis makes preoperative diagnosis by biopsy and cytology more difficult than for other tumors (see "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma"). These tumors also tend to invade the bile duct wall early and, as a result, are associated with low resectability and cure rates. Intraductal spread may mimic primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) on cholangiographic studies, complicating the radiographic diagnosis. Unfortunately, most cholangiocarcinomas are of this type. In one report, 94 percent of 194 perihilar tumors were sclerotic adenocarcinomas, as were 79 of 80 distal tumors and all nine intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas [114].

Nodular — Nodular cholangiocarcinomas present as a constricting annular lesion of the bile duct. These are highly invasive tumors, and most patients have advanced disease at the time of diagnosis; thus, the resectability and cure rates are very low.

Papillary — Papillary tumors are the rarest form of cholangiocarcinoma. These usually present as bulky masses in the common bile duct lumen, which cause biliary obstruction early in the course of the disease. For this reason, they have the highest resectability and cure rates [117,118].

Characteristics that are common to all three tumor types include slow growth, a high rate of local invasion, mucin production, and a tendency to invade perineural sheaths and spread along nerves. By contrast, distant metastases are distinctly uncommon in cholangiocarcinoma.

Most intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are adenocarcinomas with variable desmoplastic reaction, although there are several special or unusual histological features depending on the site of origin [119]. At the large intrahepatic bile ducts, papillary growth and periductal infiltration is typical, while tumors arising from ductules share a similar phenotype with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In addition to invasive cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas that arise in the setting of chronic biliary disease (eg, hepatolithiasis) are characterized by precancerous lesions including biliary intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile ducts. (See "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia' and "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct'.)

Immunohistochemistry — There are no known proteins that are differentially expressed by normal and malignant biliary epithelium and, therefore, no pathognomonic immunohistochemical test that can be used to confirm the cell type of origin. However, positive results of several types of immunohistochemical staining may be used to support a diagnosis of malignant biliary epithelium. In particular, cytokeratin-7 (CK7) positivity is consistent with biliary tract origin (table 5). However, metastatic cancers of the lung and breast are also CK7 positive, and the diagnosis of a cholangiocarcinoma is frequently a diagnosis of exclusion. This subject is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Histology and immunohistochemistry'.)

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma — Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, also referred to as primary liver carcinoma with biphenotypic differentiation or hepatocholangiocarcinoma, is now acknowledged as a distinct subtype of cholangiocarcinoma [120-122]. These tumors consist of intimately admixed elements of both HCC and cholangiocarcinoma. They are distinguished from separate HCC and cholangiocarcinomas arising in the same liver lobe (which may be separated or intermixed "collision" tumors). (See "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma'.)

These tumors are staged as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and not HCCs. (See 'TNM staging classifications' above.)

The cell of origin is debated, but the available evidence supports the view that combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma arise from a common hepatic stem cell. It is generally accepted that adult hepatic stem cells are capable of biliary or hepatocyte differentiation [123,124]. Further, investigators have shown that in at least one case, combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma was derived from a single clone, and primary cell lines derived from resected combined tumors can be induced to differentiate to the characteristics of HCC and cholangiocarcinoma under different growth conditions [125,126]. Finally, molecular studies suggest that tumors that exhibit both biliary and hepatocyte differentiation exhibit stem cell/progenitor features, a down-regulation of the hepatocyte differentiation program, and a commitment to the biliary lineage [127].

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas have distinct imaging characteristics, and they are typically treated surgically. Although multimodality therapy is often employed [128,129], its benefit is unproven. The prognosis is thought to be intermediate between that of pure HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [129-133]. Patients with advanced disease should be treated according to the principles established for advanced cholangiocarcinoma [134]. (See "Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma", section on 'MRI and MRCP' and "Systemic therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma".)

MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS — A detailed discussion of the molecular pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinomas is beyond the scope of this discussion and is well-reviewed elsewhere [135,136]. What follows is a brief overview of the salient points.

There are two precursors to cholangiocarcinoma: intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile duct and the much more common biliary intraepithelial neoplasia. Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia is graded based on the extent of cellular atypia, mirroring the spectrum of precursor lesions for pancreatic cancer [137]. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the bile duct is a macroscopic lesion similar to its pancreatic counterpart [138]. (See "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct' and "Pathology of malignant liver tumors", section on 'Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia' and "Pathology of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms", section on 'Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia' and "Pathology of exocrine pancreatic neoplasms", section on 'Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms'.)

Conversion from normal to malignant bile epithelium through one of these precursor lesions probably requires a stepwise accumulation of successive genetic abnormalities, similar to the sequence of events that underlies colorectal carcinogenesis [135,139,140]. However, the level of understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma is significantly less than that of other gastrointestinal cancers. Molecularly, the precursors of carcinoma remain poorly characterized, although they appear to harbor mutations in p53 and loss of SMAD4 [141,142]. (See "Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer".)

A variety of molecular defects involving both oncogenes (RAS, ERBB2, BRAF, EGFR, PIK3CA, CTNNB1) and tumor suppressor genes (eg, p53, SMAD4, CDKN2A) have been described in specimens of invasive biliary tract tumors. As an example, approximately one-third of tumors overexpress p53 (implying the presence of mutations in this tumor suppressor gene), while abnormal expression of KRAS is found in 45 to 54 percent of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and 10 to 15 percent of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas [135]. These genetic alterations seem to be associated with a more aggressive tumor phenotype [143,144].

The contribution of these genetic changes to cholangiocarcinoma genesis and their relationship to chronic inflammation, ethnic background, and carcinogen exposure remain uncertain (see 'Risk factors' above). At least some data suggest that p16INK4a promoter point mutations contribute to initiation and progression of cholangiocarcinoma in the setting of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) [145,146].

Mutations in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) have been identified in 25 percent of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and not extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas or gallbladder carcinomas [147]. In this study, the frequency of IDH1 and IDH2 gene mutations was greater than the combined frequency of activating mutations in other genes (AKT1, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. This suggests potential for targeting this pathway in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Although current knowledge is limited, it is hoped that advances in the understanding of the genetic pathways that contribute to the development of cholangiocarcinomas will identify driver mutations that can be successfully targeted for therapeutic benefit [148]. However, at present, there are no molecular markers that are currently used for prognosis or selecting treatment.

SUMMARY

Definition – The term cholangiocarcinoma refers to bile duct cancers arising in the intrahepatic, perihilar, or distal (extrahepatic) biliary tree, exclusive of the gallbladder or ampulla of Vater. Cancers arising in the perihilar region are further classified according to their patterns of involvement of the hepatic ducts (the Bismuth-Corlette classification) (figure 2). (See 'Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar tumors' above.)

Staging – The Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging classification from the joint American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) includes separate staging systems for intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal bile duct tumors, which differ in their definitions of primary tumor stage and their prognostic stage groupings. (See 'Anatomy, tumor classification, and staging' above.)

Epidemiology – The incidence of biliary tract cancer increases with age; the typical patient with cholangiocarcinoma is between 50 and 70 years old. The incidence rates of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have been rising over the past two to four decades in most countries. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)

Risk factors – A number of risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma have been recognized, although a specific risk factor cannot be identified for many patients. (See 'Risk factors' above.)

In the United States and Europe, the main risk factors are primary sclerosing cholangitis and choledochal cysts (fibropolycystic liver disease). (See 'Primary sclerosing cholangitis' above and 'Fibropolycystic liver disease' above.)

Southeast Asia has a very high incidence of cholangiocarcinoma that is due to a high prevalence of hepatobiliary flukes. (See 'Parasitic infection' above.)

There is a clear and strong association between chronic intrahepatic stone disease (hepatolithiasis, also called recurrent pyogenic cholangitis) and cholangiocarcinoma. (See 'Cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and hepatolithiasis' above.)

Chronic liver disease (cirrhosis and viral infection) is a risk factor, especially for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (See 'Risk factors' above.)

Genetic disorders – At least two genetic disorders are associated with an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma: Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) and a rare inherited disorder called multiple biliary papillomatosis. (See 'Genetic disorders' above.)

Histopathology – The majority of cholangiocarcinomas (>90 percent) are adenocarcinomas, with squamous cell carcinoma being responsible for most of the remaining cases. Intrahepatic adenocarcinomas can be of the small duct or large duct type. Morphologically, cholangiocarcinomas may present as one of three types: nodular, sclerosing, or papillary. (See 'Cholangiocarcinoma' above.)

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, also referred to as primary liver carcinoma with biphenotypic differentiation, is now acknowledged as a distinct rare subtype of cholangiocarcinoma. Prognosis is intermediate between that of hepatocellular cancer and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (See 'Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma' above.)

Molecular pathogenesis – A variety of molecular defects involving both oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been described in specimens of invasive biliary tract tumors. Conversion from normal to malignant bile epithelium through one of these precursor lesions probably requires a stepwise accumulation of successive genetic abnormalities. However, the level of understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma is significantly less than that of other gastrointestinal cancers. (See 'Molecular pathogenesis' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Nezam H Afdhal, MD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

  1. Nagorney DM, Pawlik TM, Chun YS, et al. Perihilar bile ducts. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed, Amin MB (Ed), AJCC, Chicago 2017. p.311.
  2. DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 2007; 245:755.
  3. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 1992; 215:31.
  4. Krasinskas A, Pawlik TM, Mino-Kenudson M, Vauthey J-N. Distal bile duct. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed, Amin MB (Ed), AJCC, Chicago 2017. p.317.
  5. Aloia T, Pawlik TM, Taouli B, et al. Intrahepatic bile ducts. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed, Amin MB (Ed), AJCC, Chicago 2017. p.295.
  6. Hong SM, Pawlik TM, Cho H, et al. Depth of tumor invasion better predicts prognosis than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for distal bile duct carcinoma. Surgery 2009; 146:250.
  7. Spolverato G, Bagante F, Weiss M, et al. Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2017; 115:696.
  8. Deoliveira ML, Schulick RD, Nimura Y, et al. New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 2011; 53:1363.
  9. Vauthey JN, Blumgart LH. Recent advances in the management of cholangiocarcinomas. Semin Liver Dis 1994; 14:109.
  10. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74:12.
  11. Patel T. Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology 2001; 33:1353.
  12. Shaib YH, Davila JA, McGlynn K, El-Serag HB. Rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a true increase? J Hepatol 2004; 40:472.
  13. Patel N, Benipal B. Incidence of Cholangiocarcinoma in the USA from 2001 to 2015: A US Cancer Statistics Analysis of 50 States. Cureus 2019; 11:e3962.
  14. Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13:261.
  15. Cancer Today: Data visualization tools for exploring the global cancer burden in 2020 https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home (Accessed on August 14, 2023).
  16. Valle JW, Kelley RK, Nervi B, et al. Biliary tract cancer. Lancet 2021; 397:428.
  17. Ouyang G, Liu Q, Wu Y, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of gallbladder and biliary tract cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990 to 2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Cancer 2021; 127:2238.
  18. Jepsen P, Vilstrup H, Tarone RE, et al. Incidence rates of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas in Denmark from 1978 through 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:895.
  19. West J, Wood H, Logan RF, et al. Trends in the incidence of primary liver and biliary tract cancers in England and Wales 1971-2001. Br J Cancer 2006; 94:1751.
  20. Rajagopalan V, Daines WP, Grossbard ML, Kozuch P. Gallbladder and biliary tract carcinoma: A comprehensive update, Part 1. Oncology (Williston Park) 2004; 18:889.
  21. Khan SA, Taylor-Robinson SD, Toledano MB, et al. Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumours. J Hepatol 2002; 37:806.
  22. Patel T. Worldwide trends in mortality from biliary tract malignancies. BMC Cancer 2002; 2:10.
  23. Welzel TM, McGlynn KA, Hsing AW, et al. Impact of classification of hilar cholangiocarcinomas (Klatskin tumors) on the incidence of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:873.
  24. Florio AA, Ferlay J, Znaor A, et al. Global trends in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma incidence from 1993 to 2012. Cancer 2020; 126:2666.
  25. Saha SK, Zhu AX, Fuchs CS, Brooks GA. Forty-Year Trends in Cholangiocarcinoma Incidence in the U.S.: Intrahepatic Disease on the Rise. Oncologist 2016; 21:594.
  26. Khan SA, Emadossadaty S, Ladep NG, et al. Rising trends in cholangiocarcinoma: is the ICD classification system misleading us? J Hepatol 2012; 56:848.
  27. Jarnagin WR. Cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Semin Surg Oncol 2000; 19:156.
  28. Shaib YH, El-Serag HB, Davila JA, et al. Risk factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a case-control study. Gastroenterology 2005; 128:620.
  29. Van Dyke AL, Shiels MS, Jones GS, et al. Biliary tract cancer incidence and trends in the United States by demographic group, 1999-2013. Cancer 2019; 125:1489.
  30. Broomé U, Olsson R, Lööf L, et al. Natural history and prognostic factors in 305 Swedish patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gut 1996; 38:610.
  31. Henson DE, Albores-Saavedra J, Corle D. Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates. Cancer 1992; 70:1498.
  32. Chapman RW. Risk factors for biliary tract carcinogenesis. Ann Oncol 1999; 10 Suppl 4:308.
  33. Clements O, Eliahoo J, Kim JU, et al. Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2020; 72:95.
  34. Tung BY, Brentnall T, Kowdley KV, et al. Diagnosis and prevalence of ulcerative colitis in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (abstract). Hepatology 1996; 24:169A.
  35. Bergquist A, Ekbom A, Olsson R, et al. Hepatic and extrahepatic malignancies in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2002; 36:321.
  36. Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1995; 332:924.
  37. Bergquist A, Glaumann H, Persson B, Broomé U. Risk factors and clinical presentation of hepatobiliary carcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case-control study. Hepatology 1998; 27:311.
  38. de Groen PC. Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: who is at risk and how do we screen? Hepatology 2000; 31:247.
  39. Burak K, Angulo P, Pasha TM, et al. Incidence and risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:523.
  40. Claessen MM, Vleggaar FP, Tytgat KM, et al. High lifetime risk of cancer in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol 2009; 50:158.
  41. Chapman MH, Webster GJ, Bannoo S, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma and dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a 25-year single-centre experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24:1051.
  42. Rosen CB, Nagorney DM, Wiesner RH, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis. Ann Surg 1991; 213:21.
  43. LaRusso NF, Wiesner RH, Ludwig J, MacCarty RL. Current concepts. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:899.
  44. Boonstra K, Weersma RK, van Erpecum KJ, et al. Population-based epidemiology, malignancy risk, and outcome of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2013; 58:2045.
  45. Chalasani N, Baluyut A, Ismail A, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a multicenter case-control study. Hepatology 2000; 31:7.
  46. Melum E, Karlsen TH, Schrumpf E, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with NKG2D polymorphisms. Hepatology 2008; 47:90.
  47. Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 2005; 366:1303.
  48. Scott J, Shousha S, Thomas HC, Sherlock S. Bile duct carcinoma: a late complication of congenital hepatic fibrosis. Case report and review of literature. Am J Gastroenterol 1980; 73:113.
  49. Lipsett PA, Pitt HA, Colombani PM, et al. Choledochal cyst disease. A changing pattern of presentation. Ann Surg 1994; 220:644.
  50. Dayton MT, Longmire WP Jr, Tompkins RK. Caroli's Disease: a premalignant condition? Am J Surg 1983; 145:41.
  51. Hsing AW, Gao YT, Han TQ, et al. Gallstones and the risk of biliary tract cancer: a population-based study in China. Br J Cancer 2007; 97:1577.
  52. Ahrens W, Timmer A, Vyberg M, et al. Risk factors for extrahepatic biliary tract carcinoma in men: medical conditions and lifestyle: results from a European multicentre case-control study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19:623.
  53. Welzel TM, Mellemkjaer L, Gloria G, et al. Risk factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a low-risk population: a nationwide case-control study. Int J Cancer 2007; 120:638.
  54. Lee PC, Hu YW, Hu LY, et al. Risk of cancer in patients with cholecystitis: a nationwide population-based study. Am J Med 2015; 128:185.
  55. Chijiiwa K, Yamashita H, Yoshida J, et al. Current management and long-term prognosis of hepatolithiasis. Arch Surg 1995; 130:194.
  56. Lee CC, Wu CY, Chen GH. What is the impact of coexistence of hepatolithiasis on cholangiocarcinoma? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17:1015.
  57. Chen MF. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (cholangiocellular carcinoma): clinical features, diagnosis and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 14:1144.
  58. Su CH, Shyr YM, Lui WY, P'Eng FK. Hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 1997; 84:969.
  59. Kinami Y, Noto H, Miyazaki I, et al. A study of hepatolithiasis associated with cholangiocarcinoma. Acta Hepatol Jpn 1978; 19:573.
  60. Yamamoto K, Tsuchiya R, Ito I, et al. A study of cholangiocarcinoma coexisting with hepatolithiasis. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 1984; 17:601.
  61. Okuda K, Kubo Y, Okazaki N, et al. Clinical aspects of intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma including hilar carcinoma: a study of 57 autopsy-proven cases. Cancer 1977; 39:232.
  62. Donato F, Gelatti U, Tagger A, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatitis C and B virus infection, alcohol intake, and hepatolithiasis: a case-control study in Italy. Cancer Causes Control 2001; 12:959.
  63. Kim YT, Byun JS, Kim J, et al. Factors predicting concurrent cholangiocarcinomas associated with hepatolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 2003; 50:8.
  64. Shin HR, Lee CU, Park HJ, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus, Clonorchis sinensis for the risk of liver cancer: a case-control study in Pusan, Korea. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25:933.
  65. Kobayashi M, Ikeda K, Saitoh S, et al. Incidence of primary cholangiocellular carcinoma of the liver in japanese patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. Cancer 2000; 88:2471.
  66. Sorensen HT, Friis S, Olsen JH, et al. Risk of liver and other types of cancer in patients with cirrhosis: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. Hepatology 1998; 28:921.
  67. Nagaoka T, Ohkawa S, Ito Y, et al. [A case of minute cholangiocellular carcinoma which was found in the follow-up periods of liver cirrhosis and was indistinguishable from hepatocellular carcinoma on hepatic angiography]. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 1991; 88:1369.
  68. Welzel TM, Graubard BI, El-Serag HB, et al. Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based case-control study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5:1221.
  69. Hsing AW, Zhang M, Rashid A, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus infection and the risk of biliary tract cancer: a population-based study in China. Int J Cancer 2008; 122:1849.
  70. Yamamoto S, Kubo S, Hai S, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection as a likely etiology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Sci 2004; 95:592.
  71. Liu XF, Zou SQ, Qiu FZ. Pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma in the porta hepatis and infection of hepatitis virus. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2003; 2:285.
  72. Okuda K, Nakanuma Y, Miyazaki M. Cholangiocarcinoma: recent progress. Part 1: epidemiology and etiology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17:1049.
  73. Lu H, Ye MQ, Thung SN, et al. Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA sequences in cholangiocarcinomas in Chinese and American patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2000; 113:1138.
  74. Chang JS, Tsai CR, Chen LT. Medical risk factors associated with cholangiocarcinoma in Taiwan: a population-based case-control study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e69981.
  75. Nakanuma Y, Xu J, Harada K, et al. Pathological spectrum of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma arising in non-biliary chronic advanced liver diseases. Pathol Int 2011; 61:298.
  76. Suriawinata A, Thung SN. Hepatitis C virus and malignancy. Hepatol Res 2007; 37:397.
  77. El-Serag HB, Engels EA, Landgren O, et al. Risk of hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers after hepatitis C virus infection: A population-based study of U.S. veterans. Hepatology 2009; 49:116.
  78. Mahale P, Torres HA, Kramer JR, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection and the risk of cancer among elderly US adults: A registry-based case-control study. Cancer 2017; 123:1202.
  79. Lee CH, Chang CJ, Lin YJ, et al. Viral hepatitis-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma shares common disease processes with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:1765.
  80. Peng NF, Li LQ, Qin X, et al. Evaluation of risk factors and clinicopathologic features for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Southern China: a possible role of hepatitis B virus. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:1258.
  81. Kinoshita M, Kubo S, Tanaka S, et al. The association between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A hospital based case-control study. J Surg Oncol 2016; 113:779.
  82. Rocha FG, Lee H, Katabi N, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct: a biliary equivalent to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas? Hepatology 2012; 56:1352.
  83. Nakanumna Y, Basturk O, Esposito I, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts. In: WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours, 5th ed, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (Ed), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019. p.279.
  84. Schlitter AM, Jang KT, Klöppel G, et al. Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms of the bile ducts: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 20 cases. Mod Pathol 2015; 28:1249.
  85. Bickenbach K, Galka E, Roggin KK. Molecular mechanisms of cholangiocarcinogenesis: are biliary intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct precursors to cholangiocarcinoma? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2009; 18:215.
  86. Basturk O. Aishima S, Esposito I. Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia. In: WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours, 5th ed, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (Ed), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019. p.273.
  87. Walpole S, Pritchard AL, Cebulla CM, et al. Comprehensive Study of the Clinical Phenotype of Germline BAP1 Variant-Carrying Families Worldwide. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110:1328.
  88. Deng M, Brägelmann J, Schultze JL, Perner S. Web-TCGA: an online platform for integrated analysis of molecular cancer data sets. BMC Bioinformatics 2016; 17:72.
  89. Chen XX, Yin Y, Cheng JW, et al. BAP1 acts as a tumor suppressor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by modulating the ERK1/2 and JNK/c-Jun pathways. Cell Death Dis 2018; 9:1036.
  90. Lee SS, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. Clinicopathologic review of 58 patients with biliary papillomatosis. Cancer 2004; 100:783.
  91. Taguchi J, Yasunaga M, Kojiro M, et al. Intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary papillomatosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993; 117:944.
  92. Yeung YP, AhChong K, Chung CK, Chun AY. Biliary papillomatosis: report of seven cases and review of English literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003; 10:390.
  93. Yamada A, Komaki Y, Komaki F, et al. Risk of gastrointestinal cancers in patients with cystic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:758.
  94. Sahani D, Prasad SR, Tannabe KK, et al. Thorotrast-induced cholangiocarcinoma: case report. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28:72.
  95. McGee EE, Jackson SS, Petrick JL, et al. Smoking, Alcohol, and Biliary Tract Cancer Risk: A Pooling Project of 26 Prospective Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111:1263.
  96. Tran KT, Coleman HG, McCain RS, Cardwell CR. Serum Biomarkers of Iron Status and Risk of Primary Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutr Cancer 2019; 71:1365.
  97. Atkins JL, Pilling LC, Masoli JAH, et al. Association of Hemochromatosis HFE p.C282Y Homozygosity With Hepatic Malignancy. JAMA 2020; 324:2048.
  98. Watanapa P. Cholangiocarcinoma in patients with opisthorchiasis. Br J Surg 1996; 83:1062.
  99. Watanapa P, Watanapa WB. Liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2002; 89:962.
  100. Honjo S, Srivatanakul P, Sriplung H, et al. Genetic and environmental determinants of risk for cholangiocarcinoma via Opisthorchis viverrini in a densely infested area in Nakhon Phanom, northeast Thailand. Int J Cancer 2005; 117:854.
  101. Zhang GW, Lin JH, Qian JP, Zhou J. Identification of risk and prognostic factors for patients with clonorchiasis-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:3628.
  102. Bulajic M, Maisonneuve P, Schneider-Brachert W, et al. Helicobacter pylori and the risk of benign and malignant biliary tract disease. Cancer 2002; 95:1946.
  103. Pandey M, Shukla M. Helicobacter species are associated with possible increase in risk of hepatobiliary tract cancers. Surg Oncol 2009; 18:51.
  104. Boonyanugomol W, Chomvarin C, Sripa B, et al. Helicobacter pylori in Thai patients with cholangiocarcinoma and its association with biliary inflammation and proliferation. HPB (Oxford) 2012; 14:177.
  105. Murphy G, Michel A, Taylor PR, et al. Association of seropositivity to Helicobacter species and biliary tract cancer in the ATBC study. Hepatology 2014; 60:1963.
  106. Jing W, Jin G, Zhou X, et al. Diabetes mellitus and increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev 2012; 21:24.
  107. Larsson SC, Giovannucci EL, Wolk A. Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Risk of Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Cancer in a Prospective Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108.
  108. Grainge MJ, West J, Solaymani-Dodaran M, et al. The antecedents of biliary cancer: a primary care case-control study in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:178.
  109. Welzel TM, Graubard BI, Zeuzem S, et al. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of primary liver cancer in the United States: a study in the SEER-Medicare database. Hepatology 2011; 54:463.
  110. Abrahami D, Douros A, Yin H, et al. Incretin based drugs and risk of cholangiocarcinoma among patients with type 2 diabetes: population based cohort study. BMJ 2018; 363:k4880.
  111. Leiter LA, Teoh H, Mosenzon O, et al. Frequency of cancer events with saxagliptin in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2016; 18:186.
  112. Petrick JL, McMenamin ÚC, Zhang X, et al. Exogenous hormone use, reproductive factors and risk of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma among women: results from cohort studies in the Liver Cancer Pooling Project and the UK Biobank. Br J Cancer 2020; 123:316.
  113. McGlynn KA, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Campbell PT, et al. Reproductive factors, exogenous hormone use and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among US women: results from the Liver Cancer Pooling Project. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1266.
  114. Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Sohn TA, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Ann Surg 1996; 224:463.
  115. Nakanuma Y, Klimstra DS, Komuta M, Zen Y. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours" Digestive system tumors, 5th ed, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. (Ed), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019. p.254.
  116. Roa JC, Adsay NV, Arola J, et al. Carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts.. In: WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours, 5th ed, WHO classification of Tumours Editorial Board (Ed), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019. p.289.
  117. Jarnagin WR, Bowne W, Klimstra DS, et al. Papillary phenotype confers improved survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2005; 241:703.
  118. Martin RC, Klimstra DS, Schwartz L, et al. Hepatic intraductal oncocytic papillary carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 95:2180.
  119. Nakanuma Y, Harada K, Ishikawa A, et al. Anatomic and molecular pathology of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2003; 10:265.
  120. Nakanuma Y, Sato Y, Harada K, et al. Pathological classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on a new concept. World J Hepatol 2010; 2:419.
  121. Akiba J, Nakashima O, Hattori S, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma according to the latest WHO classification. Am J Surg Pathol 2013; 37:496.
  122. Sempoux C, Kakar S, Kondo F, Schirmacher P. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. In: WHO Classificatrion of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours, 5th ed, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (Ed), International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019. p.260.
  123. Alison MR. Liver stem cells: implications for hepatocarcinogenesis. Stem Cell Rev 2005; 1:253.
  124. Wu XZ, Chen D. Origin of hepatocellular carcinoma: role of stem cells. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21:1093.
  125. Yano H, Iemura A, Haramaki M, et al. A human combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma cell line (KMCH-2) that shows the features of hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma under different growth conditions. J Hepatol 1996; 24:413.
  126. Fujii H, Zhu XG, Matsumoto T, et al. Genetic classification of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 2000; 31:1011.
  127. Coulouarn C, Cavard C, Rubbia-Brandt L, et al. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas exhibit progenitor features and activation of Wnt and TGFβ signaling pathways. Carcinogenesis 2012; 33:1791.
  128. Lee CH, Hsieh SY, Chang CJ, Lin YJ. Comparison of clinical characteristics of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and other primary liver cancers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28:122.
  129. Spolverato G, Bagante F, Tsilimigras D, et al. Management and outcomes among patients with mixed hepatocholangiocellular carcinoma: A population-based analysis. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:278.
  130. Kassahun WT, Hauss J. Management of combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62:1271.
  131. Yap AQ, Chen CL, Yong CC, et al. Clinicopathological factors impact the survival outcome following the resection of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol 2013; 22:55.
  132. Yin X, Zhang BH, Qiu SJ, et al. Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical features, treatment modalities, and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:2869.
  133. Garancini M, Goffredo P, Pagni F, et al. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a population-level analysis of an uncommon primary liver tumor. Liver Transpl 2014; 20:952.
  134. Salimon M, Prieux-Klotz C, Tougeron D, et al. Gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of hepatocholangiocarcinoma: an AGEO French multicentre retrospective study. Br J Cancer 2018; 118:325.
  135. Hezel AF, Deshpande V, Zhu AX. Genetics of biliary tract cancers and emerging targeted therapies. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:3531.
  136. Zabron A, Edwards RJ, Khan SA. The challenge of cholangiocarcinoma: dissecting the molecular mechanisms of an insidious cancer. Dis Model Mech 2013; 6:281.
  137. Zen Y, Adsay NV, Bardadin K, et al. Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia: an international interobserver agreement study and proposal for diagnostic criteria. Mod Pathol 2007; 20:701.
  138. Klöppel G, Kosmahl M. Is the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia of the biliary tract a counterpart of pancreatic papillary mucinous neoplasm? J Hepatol 2006; 44:249.
  139. Razumilava N, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet 2014; 383:2168.
  140. Schlitter AM, Born D, Bettstetter M, et al. Intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct: stepwise progression to carcinoma involves common molecular pathways. Mod Pathol 2014; 27:73.
  141. Nakanishi Y, Zen Y, Kondo S, et al. Expression of cell cycle-related molecules in biliary premalignant lesions: biliary intraepithelial neoplasia and biliary intraductal papillary neoplasm. Hum Pathol 2008; 39:1153.
  142. Hoang MP, Murakata LA, Katabi N, et al. Invasive papillary carcinomas of the extrahepatic bile ducts: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 13 cases. Mod Pathol 2002; 15:1251.
  143. Isa T, Tomita S, Nakachi A, et al. Analysis of microsatellite instability, K-ras gene mutation and p53 protein overexpression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49:604.
  144. Nehls O, Gregor M, Klump B. Serum and bile markers for cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2004; 24:139.
  145. Taniai M, Higuchi H, Burgart LJ, Gores GJ. p16INK4a promoter mutations are frequent in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and PSC-associated cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:1090.
  146. Tannapfel A, Benicke M, Katalinic A, et al. Frequency of p16(INK4A) alterations and K-ras mutations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the liver. Gut 2000; 47:721.
  147. Borger DR, Tanabe KK, Fan KC, et al. Frequent mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and IDH2 in cholangiocarcinoma identified through broad-based tumor genotyping. Oncologist 2012; 17:72.
  148. Andersen JB, Spee B, Blechacz BR, et al. Genomic and genetic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma identifies therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Gastroenterology 2012; 142:1021.
Topic 663 Version 66.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟