ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

NSAIDs (including aspirin): Pathogenesis and risk factors for gastroduodenal toxicity

NSAIDs (including aspirin): Pathogenesis and risk factors for gastroduodenal toxicity
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Jun 23, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used because of their versatile effectiveness as analgesics, antipyretics, and antiinflammatory agents. Aspirin is also used in relatively low doses as an antiplatelet agent [1]. However, even very low doses of oral aspirin and other NSAIDs can injure the gastric and duodenal mucosa, with the potential for considerable morbidity and mortality [2].

This topic will review the pathogenesis and risk factors for gastroduodenal toxicity due to the use of NSAIDs and aspirin. The clinical presentation of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal injury and recommendations for the prevention and treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal injury are discussed elsewhere. (See "NSAIDs: Adverse effects on the distal small bowel and colon" and "Nonselective NSAIDs: Overview of adverse effects" and "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity" and "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Treatment and secondary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

OVERVIEW OF CYCLOOXYGENASE AND MUCOSAL PROSTAGLANDIN BIOLOGY

Role of cyclooxygenase — Cyclooxygenase (COX), the rate-limiting enzyme in prostaglandin (PG) synthesis, converts the unsaturated fatty acid arachidonic acid (C20:4; derived from phospholipids in cell membranes) into PGG2 and then to PGH2 (figure 1). The gastric and duodenal mucosa proceed to convert PGH2 to various prostanoids (prostaglandins and thromboxane A2). PGs such as PGE2 and PGI2 protect the mucosal lining from injury by luminal acid-pepsin.

There are two functional forms of COX in the human body, COX-1 and COX-2 [3]. These two proteins are 50 to 60 percent homologous and are coded on chromosomes 9 and 1, respectively. COX-1 is a constitutive enzyme with a fairly steady rate of expression in most cells of the body. In contrast, COX-2 is produced in many cells only when bacterial polysaccharides (endotoxin), pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha or interleukin (IL)-1beta, or growth factors (mitogens) induce COX-2 expression. The healthy gastric and duodenal mucosa constitutively use COX-1 to produce its mucosal-protective PGs [4]. (See "Overview of COX-2 selective NSAIDs", section on 'COX-2 selective NSAIDs (coxibs)'.)

Mechanism of mucosal protection

Prostaglandins — Several mucosal functions are altered by endogenous PGs and by exogenously administered PGs. These changes may contribute to the mucosal protective effects of PGs. While it is true that certain PGs such as PGE2 reduce gastric acid secretion, hypochlorhydria does not entirely explain the mucosal protection observed with PGE2. In animals, for example, doses of PGE2 far too low to inhibit gastric acid secretion profoundly protect against gastric injury induced by aspirin, alcohol, and other gastric irritants. This non-antisecretory effect of PGs is referred to as "cytoprotection."

Some of the cytoprotective mechanisms of PGs include:

Stimulation of mucin, bicarbonate, and phospholipid secretion by gastroduodenal epithelial cells

Enhancement of mucosal blood flow and the delivery of oxygen to epithelial cells via local vasodilation

Increased epithelial cell migration towards the luminal surface (epithelial restitution)

Enhanced epithelial cell proliferation

Epithelial mucin and bicarbonate combine to form an alkaline, unstirred water layer on the surface of the gastric mucosa, which retards diffusion of acid-pepsin from the lumen into the mucosa.

Nitric oxide — Generation of nitric oxide (NO) by NO synthase (NOS) may be a key intermediate in cytoprotection. Similar to the role of COX-1, constitutive NOS is important in the maintenance of an intact mucosal lining. Two enzymes contribute to the basal, constitutive NOS activity: neuronal NOS (nNOS; type I) and endothelial NOS (eNOS; type III). The cytoprotective mechanisms of NO parallel PG effects and include:

Stimulation of gastric mucin and bicarbonate secretion

Enhancement of mucosal blood flow

Maintenance of epithelial barrier function

In some but not all models, an inducible NOS (iNOS; type II) produces high levels of NO leading to physiologic responses that are often quite different than seen in the basal state. Inducible NOS is generally associated with inflammatory states, similar to COX-2 [5]. However, the relationship between the various NOS forms and COX enzymes has not been fully elucidated. Most studies implicate both constitutive and inducible enzymes in the maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity as well as in epithelial restitution [6,7]. Manipulation of NO levels in models of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced mucosal damage suggests a protective role for both NO and PGs [8,9].

PATHOGENESIS OF GASTRODUODENAL TOXICITY

Mechanism of action of NSAIDs — The primary effect of NSAIDs is to inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX; prostaglandin [PG] synthase), thereby impairing the ultimate transformation of arachidonic acid to PGs, prostacyclin, and thromboxanes. Many nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) block COX-1 and COX-2 more or less equally (ie, are nonselective) and thus may impair gastric PG production at low tissue concentrations (table 1). Selective inhibitors of COX-2 may better preserve PG-mediated gastrointestinal mucosal protection (table 1). However, COX-2 selective inhibitors (eg, celecoxib) may still block COX-1 in the stomach and duodenum at clinically recommended doses and thus have the potential to cause mucosal injury.

COX-1 mediated NSAID injury — Gastric and duodenal injury by acid and pepsin may occur when the protective functions of PGs are compromised as a consequence of PG deficiency induced by COX-1 inhibiting NSAIDs [10]. Injury to the stomach or duodenum can range from subtle alterations in gastric mucosal barrier function, microscopic damage to surface cells, or even to gross injury. The most subtle change is disruption of mucosal barrier function, manifesting as increased mucosal permeability to hydrogen ions (which then diffuse more rapidly from the lumen into the mucosa) and sodium ions (which then diffuse more rapidly from the mucosa into the lumen). Disruption of the gastric mucosal barrier and the resultant damage to surface cells by gastric acid may result in macroscopic injury over time if repair mechanisms are ineffective.

Repair mechanisms include rapid migration of deeper epithelial cells lining gastric pits to cover the damaged surface (restitution) and less rapid regeneration of new epithelial cells from progenitor cells (proliferation). Epithelial restitution and proliferation both require adequate amounts of well-oxygenated blood at a pH close to 7.4. PGs and nitric oxide (NO) have important roles in these repair mechanisms, while COX inhibitors can disrupt these PG-dependent reparative processes. Gastric restitution has been associated with induction of COX-2 [11]. Aspirin-induced gastric injury is also associated with inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which may reduce angiogenesis, inhibit autophagy (an adaptive response to cell stress that can promote cell survival), and enhance gastric cell apoptosis [12,13].

Macroscopic injury by NSAIDs ranges from edema, erythema, subepithelial hemorrhage, erosions (mucosal breaks, without visible depth to the lesion), and ulcers (mucosal breaks, with visible depth to the lesion). Only erosive/ulcerative lesions are considered clinically important, although lesser lesions may be precursors of erosive lesions if reparative mechanisms fail. Development of the full spectrum of lesions in the PG-depleted stomach or duodenum requires acid and pepsin; potent acid inhibition (eg, with proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) markedly protects against their development. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

Gastric damage — The gastrointestinal mucosa uses COX-1 to generate mucosal-protective PGs. Aspirin doses as low as 10 mg/day inhibit gastric PG generation considerably and can damage the stomach [14]. Epidemiologic and placebo-controlled studies indicate that the risk of serious, clinically-relevant gastrointestinal damage increases as the aspirin dose is raised [15-17].

After low-dose aspirin therapy is stopped, the human stomach requires five to eight days to recover its COX-1 activity and its ability to synthesize protective PGs, suggesting a very slow turnover of gastric COX-1 [18]. Thus, gastric mucosa somewhat resembles the megakaryocyte/platelet, which requires 10 to 14 days to recover from aspirin.

Although aspirin inhibits COX-1 and also COX-2 (table 1), certain COX-2-mediated reactions can still occur after aspirin has been given, such as the conversion of arachidonic acid to the fatty acid 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (15-HETE); 15-HETE is then converted to 15-epi lipoxin A4 by another enzyme, 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX). Studies in animals have demonstrated enhanced production of 15-epi lipoxin A4 following aspirin exposure [19]. Furthermore, this lipoxin minimizes gastric damage by aspirin (ie, it is cytoprotective). This protective effect of 15-epi lipoxin A4 can be abolished (with more gastric damage resulting) by administering a selective COX-2 inhibitor [19]. Therefore, the combination of low-dose aspirin and a COX-2 selective inhibitor may lead to more gastrointestinal damage than low-dose aspirin alone.

In contrast to aspirin, which acetylates COX irreversibly, most NSAIDs inhibit COX-1 and COX–2 reversibly [3]. Nevertheless, even transient but repeated COX inhibition in the gastric mucosa by an NSAID is sufficient to predispose the stomach to injury. That this injury is due to loss of PG-mediated cytoprotection is supported by the observation that NSAID-related gastric damage is prevented by exogenous PGE analogs (drugs) such as misoprostol [20].

Misoprostol does not primarily protect the stomach by inhibiting the stomach's ability to produce hydrochloric acid because drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion to the same or slightly greater extent as misoprostol, such as histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), have little or no protective effect against NSAID-induced gastric damage. Fortunately, the relative failure of H2RAs to protect the stomach from damage by NSAIDs may be overcome by using higher H2RA doses or by using more potent acid-inhibitory compounds such as PPIs. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

Duodenal damage — Aspirin doses as low as 325 mg every other day increase the risk of duodenal ulcers [21]. In contrast to the stomach, damage to the duodenal mucosa by aspirin and NSAIDs seems to depend highly upon gastric acid. Thus, not only misoprostol but also by histamine-2 blockers with their modest acid inhibition can largely prevent endoscopic evidence of duodenal mucosal injury by NSAIDs. PPIs are also highly effective. These observations related to the pathogenesis of gastric and duodenal injury lay the groundwork for using either a PPI or misoprostol in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

Non-COX-1 mediated injury — NSAIDs probably interfere with growth factors and other mediators responsible for restitution and adaptive protection. Adaptive protection refers to the observation that mild gastric irritants induce enhanced cytoprotection. In addition to COX-1, COX-2, and NO, various growth factors such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta and TGF-alpha appear to participate in adaptive protection [22]. Endogenous trefoil factor proteins are also associated with mucosal protection in indomethacin-induced injury in rats [23].

RISK FACTORS FOR NSAID-INDUCED GASTRODUODENAL TOXICITY

NSAID dose and duration — Ulcer risk increases with dose of therapy. However, gastroduodenal toxicity may develop even in patients taking low doses of aspirin [24], which can be associated with a significant decrease in gastric mucosal prostaglandin [PG] concentrations [14]. Gastroduodenal complications are most common within the first three months after the initiation of therapy, but longer duration of therapy is associated with an increased risk of developing ulcer complications [21,24-39]. (See "Aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer", section on 'Potential risks'.)

Helicobacter pylori infection — The role of H. pylori infection in nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastritis or ulcer formation is complex [40-48]. NSAID use and H. pylori infection represent independent yet synergistic risk factors for uncomplicated and bleeding peptic ulcer disease [PUD] [49,50]. In a systematic review with a total of 21 studies, the risk of uncomplicated PUD among NSAID users was significantly higher among H. pylori positive compared with H. pylori negative individuals (odds ratio [OR] 1.81) [50]. Ulcers were more common in H. pylori positive compared with H. pylori negative patients irrespective of NSAID use (OR 4.03) and in NSAID users compared with nonusers irrespective of H. pylori status (OR 3.10). Eradication of H. pylori prior to NSAID treatment can reduce the risk of PUD [44-46,51]. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity", section on 'Role of helicobacter pylori'.)

Other risk factors — Other important risk factors for gastroduodenal toxicity of NSAIDs include increasing age, a past history of gastroduodenal toxicity from NSAIDs, a past history of PUD, and concurrent use of glucocorticoids, anticoagulants, and clopidogrel and probably bisphosphonates and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] [21,25,37,39,52].

SSRIs are associated with an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly in patients taking NSAIDs [53-58]. A possible mechanism is platelet serotonin depletion, which may adversely influence the hemostatic response to vascular injury [37]. In a meta-analysis that included 15 case-control studies and four cohort studies, the use of SSRIs was associated with an increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared with not using an SSRI (OR for case-control studies 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-1.9; OR for cohort studies 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5) [59]. When the analysis was confined to patients receiving NSAIDs, the risk was even higher (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.8-6.4). However, the risk of toxicity may not be uniform among the NSAIDs. The gastrointestinal toxicity of different NSAIDs is discussed in detail separately. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity", section on 'Nonselective NSAIDs'.)

Genetic predisposition to gastroduodenal injury due to polymorphism of cytochrome P450 2C9 may delay the metabolism of several NSAIDs, with a prolonged duration of drug exposure enhancing their ulcerogenic effect [60].

ASSESSMENT OF GASTRODUODENAL TOXICITY RISK — The risk of gastroduodenal toxicity in patients taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be categorized as being as high, moderate, or low based on the presence of a complicated ulcer and the following risk factors [61]:

History of an uncomplicated ulcer

Age >65 years

High-dose NSAID therapy

Concurrent use of aspirin (including low dose), glucocorticoids, or anticoagulants

Based on these risk factors, magnitude of risk can be assessed as follows:

High risk – Presence of ≥3 risk factors or history of a complicated ulcer

Moderate risk – Presence of one or two risk factors

Low risk – None of the four risk factors listed

Strategies to avoid mucosal damage in patients on NSAIDs based on their risk of toxicity are discussed in detail separately. (See "NSAIDs (including aspirin): Primary prevention of gastroduodenal toxicity".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Beyond the Basics topics (see "Patient education: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Role of cyclooxygenase – Cyclooxygenase (COX), the rate-limiting enzyme in prostaglandin (PG) synthesis, converts the unsaturated fatty acid arachidonic acid (C20:4; derived from phospholipids in cell membranes) into PGG2 and then to PGH2 (figure 1). The gastric and duodenal mucosa proceed to convert PGH2 to various prostanoids (PGs and thromboxane A2). PGs such as PGE2 protect the mucosal lining from injury by luminal acid-pepsin. (See 'Role of cyclooxygenase' above.)

Mucosal protection by prostaglandins – Certain PGs such as PGE2 reduce gastric acid secretion. Other cytoprotective mechanisms of PGs include (see 'Mechanism of mucosal protection' above):

Stimulation of mucin, bicarbonate, and phospholipid secretion by epithelial cells

Enhancement of mucosal blood flow and the delivery of oxygen to epithelial cells via local vasodilation

Increased epithelial cell migration towards the luminal surface (epithelial restitution)

Enhanced epithelial cell proliferation

Mechanism of NSAID injury – Mucosal damage by aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is primarily a consequence of inhibition of COX-1 in the upper gastrointestinal tract, although COX-2 inhibition may also play a role. COX inhibition reduces mucosal generation of protective PGs such as PGE2. NSAIDs may also interfere with growth factors and other mediators responsible for restitution and adaptive protection. (See 'Mechanism of action of NSAIDs' above.)

Risk factors for NSAID-induced gastroduodenal toxicity – Ulcer risk increases with dose and duration of NSAID therapy. NSAID use and H. pylori infection represent independent yet synergistic risk factors for uncomplicated and bleeding peptic ulcer disease. Other important risk factors for gastroduodenal toxicity of NSAIDs include increasing age, a past history of gastroduodenal toxicity from NSAIDs, a past history of peptic ulcer disease, and concurrent use of glucocorticoids, anticoagulants, and clopidogrel and possibly bisphosphonates and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]. Genetic predisposition to gastroduodenal injury due to polymorphism of cytochrome P450 2C9 may delay the metabolism of several NSAIDs, with a prolonged duration of drug exposure enhancing their ulcerogenic effect. (See 'Other risk factors' above.)

Assessment of gastroduodenal toxicity risk The risk of gastroduodenal toxicity in patients taking NSAIDs can be categorized as high, moderate, or low based on the presence of the following risk factors:

History of an uncomplicated ulcer

Age >65 years

High-dose NSAID therapy

Concurrent use of aspirin (including low dose), glucocorticoids, or anticoagulants

Based on these risk factors, magnitude of risk is categorized as follows:

High risk – Presence of ≥3 risk factors or history of a complicated ulcer

Moderate risk – Presence of one or two risk factors

Low risk – None of the four risk factors listed (see 'Assessment of gastroduodenal toxicity risk' above)

  1. Rothwell PM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, et al. Effects of aspirin on risks of vascular events and cancer according to bodyweight and dose: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2018; 392:387.
  2. Kang DO, An H, Park GU, et al. Cardiovascular and Bleeding Risks Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs After Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76:518.
  3. Flower RJ. The development of COX2 inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003; 2:179.
  4. Cryer B, Feldman M. Cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 selectivity of widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med 1998; 104:413.
  5. Wallace JL, Miller MJ. Nitric oxide in mucosal defense: a little goes a long way. Gastroenterology 2000; 119:512.
  6. Whittle BJ, Lopez-Belmonte J, Moncada S. Regulation of gastric mucosal integrity by endogenous nitric oxide: interactions with prostanoids and sensory neuropeptides in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 1990; 99:607.
  7. Whittle BJ, Lopez-Belmonte J. Actions and interactions of endothelins, prostacyclin and nitric oxide in the gastric mucosa. J Physiol Pharmacol 1993; 44:91.
  8. Takeuchi K, Yasuhiro T, Asada Y, Sugawa Y. Role of nitric oxide in pathogenesis of aspirin-induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Digestion 1998; 59:298.
  9. Jiménez D, Martin MJ, Pozo D, et al. Mechanisms involved in protection afforded by L-arginine in ibuprofen-induced gastric damage: role of nitric oxide and prostaglandins. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47:44.
  10. Redfern S, Lee E, Feldman M. Effect of immunization with prostaglandin metabolites on gastroduodenal ulceration. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 1988; 255:G723.
  11. Horie-Sakata K, Shimada T, Hiraishi H, Terano A. Role of cyclooxygenase 2 in hepatocyte growth factor-mediated gastric epithelial restitution. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998; 27 Suppl 1:S40.
  12. Cheng Y, Lin J, Liu J, et al. Decreased vascular endothelial growth factor expression is associated with cell apoptosis in low-dose aspirin-induced gastric mucosal injury. Am J Med Sci 2015; 349:110.
  13. Hernández C, Barrachina MD, Vallecillo-Hernández J, et al. Aspirin-induced gastrointestinal damage is associated with an inhibition of epithelial cell autophagy. J Gastroenterol 2016; 51:691.
  14. Cryer B, Feldman M. Effects of very low dose daily, long-term aspirin therapy on gastric, duodenal, and rectal prostaglandin levels and on mucosal injury in healthy humans. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:17.
  15. Jick H. Effects of aspirin and acetaminophen in gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Results from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. Arch Intern Med 1981; 141:316.
  16. Farrell B, Godwin J, Richards S, Warlow C. The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54:1044.
  17. Weil J, Colin-Jones D, Langman M, et al. Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. BMJ 1995; 310:827.
  18. Feldman M, Shewmake K, Cryer B. Time course inhibition of gastric and platelet COX activity by acetylsalicylic acid in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2000; 279:G1113.
  19. Fiorucci S, de Lima OM Jr, Mencarelli A, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2-derived lipoxin A4 increases gastric resistance to aspirin-induced damage. Gastroenterology 2002; 123:1598.
  20. Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, et al. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. JAMA 2000; 284:1247.
  21. Steering Committee of the Physicians' Health Study Research Group. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. N Engl J Med 1989; 321:129.
  22. Kato K, Chen MC, Nguyen M, et al. Effects of growth factors and trefoil peptides on migration and replication in primary oxyntic cultures. Am J Physiol 1999; 276:G1105.
  23. Babyatsky MW, deBeaumont M, Thim L, Podolsky DK. Oral trefoil peptides protect against ethanol- and indomethacin-induced gastric injury in rats. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:489.
  24. García Rodríguez LA, Lin KJ, Hernández-Díaz S, Johansson S. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid alone and in combination with clopidogrel and other medications. Circulation 2011; 123:1108.
  25. Savage RL, Moller PW, Ballantyne CL, Wells JE. Variation in the risk of peptic ulcer complications with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36:84.
  26. Langman MJ, Weil J, Wainwright P, et al. Risks of bleeding peptic ulcer associated with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Lancet 1994; 343:1075.
  27. Griffin MR, Piper JM, Daugherty JR, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:257.
  28. Gabriel SE, Jaakkimainen L, Bombardier C. Risk for serious gastrointestinal complications related to use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115:787.
  29. García Rodríguez LA, Jick H. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Lancet 1994; 343:769.
  30. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral anticoagulants places elderly persons at high risk for hemorrhagic peptic ulcer disease. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:1665.
  31. Slattery J, Warlow CP, Shorrock CJ, Langman MJ. Risks of gastrointestinal bleeding during secondary prevention of vascular events with aspirin--analysis of gastrointestinal bleeding during the UK-TIA trial. Gut 1995; 37:509.
  32. Allison MC, Howatson AG, Torrance CJ, et al. Gastrointestinal damage associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med 1992; 327:749.
  33. Naschitz JE, Yeshurun D, Odeh M, et al. Overt gastrointestinal bleeding in the course of chronic low-dose aspirin administration for secondary prevention of arterial occlusive disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85:408.
  34. Carson JL, Strom BL, Morse ML, et al. The relative gastrointestinal toxicity of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147:1054.
  35. Fries JF, Williams CA, Bloch DA, Michel BA. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastropathy: incidence and risk factor models. Am J Med 1991; 91:213.
  36. Griffin MR, Ray WA, Schaffner W. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and death from peptic ulcer in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:359.
  37. Piper JM, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Corticosteroid use and peptic ulcer disease: role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:735.
  38. Hernández-Díaz S, Rodríguez LA. Association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding/perforation: an overview of epidemiologic studies published in the 1990s. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:2093.
  39. Laine L, Curtis SP, Cryer B, et al. Risk factors for NSAID-associated upper GI clinical events in a long-term prospective study of 34 701 arthritis patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32:1240.
  40. Kim JG, Graham DY. Helicobacter pylori infection and development of gastric or duodenal ulcer in arthritic patients receiving chronic NSAID therapy. The Misoprostol Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89:203.
  41. Thillainayagam AV, Tabaqchali S, Warrington SJ, Farthing MJ. Interrelationships between Helicobacter pylori infection, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and gastroduodenal disease. A prospective study in healthy volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39:1085.
  42. Loeb DS, Talley NJ, Ahlquist DA, et al. Long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and gastroduodenal injury: the role of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 1992; 102:1899.
  43. Gubbins GP, Schubert TT, Attanasio F, et al. Helicobacter pylori seroprevalence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gold compounds. Am J Med 1992; 93:412.
  44. Chan FK, Sung JJ, Chung SC, et al. Randomised trial of eradication of Helicobacter pylori before non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy to prevent peptic ulcers. Lancet 1997; 350:975.
  45. Chan FK, To KF, Wu JC, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and risk of peptic ulcers in patients starting long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359:9.
  46. Hawkey CJ, Tulassay Z, Szczepanski L, et al. Randomised controlled trial of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: HELP NSAIDs study. Helicobacter Eradication for Lesion Prevention. Lancet 1998; 352:1016.
  47. Hawkey CJ. Risk of ulcer bleeding in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gut 2000; 46:310.
  48. Papatheodoridis GV, Papadelli D, Cholongitas E, et al. Effect of helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med 2004; 116:601.
  49. Huang JQ, Sridhar S, Hunt RH. Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2002; 359:14.
  50. Papatheodoridis GV, Sougioultzis S, Archimandritis AJ. Effects of Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on peptic ulcer disease: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4:130.
  51. Labenz J, Blum AL, Bolten WW, et al. Primary prevention of diclofenac associated ulcers and dyspepsia by omeprazole or triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori positive patients: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial. Gut 2002; 51:329.
  52. Colon P, Picard B. [Reconstruction of pulpectomized teeth]. Real Clin 1990; 1:223.
  53. Dall M, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, Lassen AT, et al. An association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use and serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7:1314.
  54. Meijer WE, Heerdink ER, Nolen WA, et al. Association of risk of abnormal bleeding with degree of serotonin reuptake inhibition by antidepressants. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:2367.
  55. de Abajo FJ, Rodríguez LA, Montero D. Association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and upper gastrointestinal bleeding: population based case-control study. BMJ 1999; 319:1106.
  56. Targownik LE, Bolton JM, Metge CJ, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are associated with a modest increase in the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:1475.
  57. de Abajo FJ, García-Rodríguez LA. Risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine therapy: interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and effect of acid-suppressing agents. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65:795.
  58. Opatrny L, Delaney JA, Suissa S. Gastro-intestinal haemorrhage risks of selective serotonin receptor antagonist therapy: a new look. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 66:76.
  59. Anglin R, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P, et al. Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with or without concurrent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:811.
  60. Pilotto A, Seripa D, Franceschi M, et al. Genetic susceptibility to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related gastroduodenal bleeding: role of cytochrome P450 2C9 polymorphisms. Gastroenterology 2007; 133:465.
  61. Lanza FL, Chan FK, Quigley EM, Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for prevention of NSAID-related ulcer complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:728.
Topic 8 Version 27.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟