Version July 2025
INTRODUCTION —
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a relatively common condition. Since this valve lesion is frequently asymptomatic and may not be detected on physical examination, it is often diagnosed solely by echocardiography. This topic will review the prognosis and management of TR.
Etiology, clinical features, and evaluation of TR are discussed separately. (See "Tricuspid regurgitation: Etiology, clinical features, and evaluation".)
CONSIDERATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT —
Management of TR is based upon the stage of TR, the cause of TR, the presence and extent of symptoms and signs of heart failure (HF), and the presence and extent of associated abnormalities, including pulmonary hypertension, tricuspid annular dilation, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, and other valve disease:
●Stage of TR – The stage of TR is determined based upon clinical manifestations and cardiac imaging, generally Doppler echocardiography (table 1), and, in selected cases, TR severity is quantitated with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging [1-3]. TR is present in approximately 80 percent of normal individuals [4], so a Stage A is not included in these definitions. (See "Tricuspid regurgitation: Etiology, clinical features, and evaluation", section on 'Stages of tricuspid regurgitation'.)
●Cause of TR – The causes of TR are categorized as primary or secondary (see "Tricuspid regurgitation: Etiology, clinical features, and evaluation", section on 'Etiology'):
•Primary TR is due to disease of the valve apparatus (leaflets and chordae) including congenital (eg, Ebstein anomaly), endocarditis, rheumatic, and carcinoid heart disease.
Management approaches for specific conditions are discussed separately:
-(See "Ebstein anomaly: Management and prognosis".)
-(See "Right-sided native valve infective endocarditis".)
-(See "Carcinoid heart disease", section on 'Management'.)
•Secondary TR is due pulmonary hypertension with RV dilation and systolic dysfunction due to either left sided heart disease (systolic or diastolic left ventricular function and/or left-sided valve disease), primary pulmonary hypertension, pulmonic stenosis, or other causes of pulmonary hypertension.
Management approaches for specific conditions are discussed separately including:
-Management of HF. (See "Overview of the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in adults" and "Treatment and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction".)
-Management of concurrent valve disease. (See "Chronic primary mitral regurgitation: General management" and "Chronic secondary mitral regurgitation: General management and prognosis" and "Rheumatic mitral stenosis: Overview of management".)
GENERAL MANAGEMENT
Serial follow-up — Given the adverse prognosis associated with significant TR (see 'Prognosis' below), routine clinical and echocardiographic follow-up is recommended in patients with mild TR (table 1). (See "Tricuspid regurgitation: Etiology, clinical features, and evaluation".)
We suggest the following frequencies of serial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for asymptomatic TR (including evaluation of the tricuspid valve (TV) structure and function, RV size and function, and left heart disease) [1] (see "Echocardiographic evaluation of the tricuspid valve"):
●Progressive TR
•Mild TR
-For patients with isolated mild TR with a normal TV, no routine follow-up is required.
-For mild TR with concomitant RV dilation/dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension, we suggest follow-up every three to five years.
•Moderate TR – Every one to two years.
●Severe TR – Every year (more frequently if the RV is dilating).
In addition, TTE should be performed in patients with a significant change in symptoms or signs that might be due to increasing severity of TR.
Management of heart failure — Medical therapy remains the primary approach to management for most patients with severe TR and HF.
●Right heart failure – In patients with severe TR and right-sided HF, diuretics are suggested to treat volume overload, including peripheral edema and ascites [1]. Loop diuretics are typically used. Aldosterone antagonists may provide additional benefit, particularly in those with hepatic congestion with secondary hyperaldosteronism.
●Left heart failure – Most adults with TR have significant left-sided heart disease and treatment should be directed at the primary disease process (eg, HF with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF], HF with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF], or primary or secondary mitral valve disease). As an example, if HFrEF is present, this is treated with standard regimens [1]. (See "Overview of the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in adults" and "Primary pharmacologic therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction" and "Secondary pharmacologic therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction".)
The role of medical therapy in management of severe TR is illustrated by the following studies:
●In a series of 87 patients with severe TR referred for intervention, the mean age was 80 years (56 percent female), 93 percent were in atrial fibrillation, and 64 percent had Stage 3a or higher chronic kidney disease [5]. Most were treated with loop diuretics and about one-third received mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Overall, 75 percent were treated with medications alone with a 30-day and 1-year survival of 100 percent and 76 percent, respectively.
●In a retrospective analysis of 3276 adults identified from an echocardiography database with isolated severe TR, only 5 percent underwent TV surgery (mostly repair not replacement) with 95 percent managed on medical therapy. Using a propensity matched sample with surgery as a time-dependent covariate, there was no difference in overall survival between medical and surgery therapy (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% CI 0.78-2.30) [6].
Treatment of causes of pulmonary hypertension — If pulmonary hypertension is present, treatment of the cause of pulmonary hypertension is recommended. Reduction of high pulmonary artery pressures may help reduce secondary TR (ie, due to pulmonary hypertension without intrinsic tricuspid valvular disease) [1]. Pulmonary vasodilators to reduce elevated pulmonary pressures may also be helpful in patients with secondary or primary pulmonary hypertension [7]. (See "Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (group 2 pulmonary hypertension) in adults" and "Treatment and prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults (group 1)" and "Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (group 1) in adults: Pulmonary hypertension-specific therapy".)
As examples, improvement in TR has been demonstrated in the following settings with correction of reversible pulmonary hypertension:
●Treatment of HFrEF – Treatment of pulmonary hypertension likely contributes to improvement in TR during medical treatment of HFrEF [8].
●Treatment of mitral stenosis – A number of observational studies have documented improvement in TR (particularly functional TR) after percutaneous balloon valvotomy for mitral stenosis [9-11] (see "Percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy in adults"). In a series of 71 patients with mitral stenosis and moderate to severe functional TR, percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy led to resolution of TR on follow-up echocardiography in 23 (32 percent) [9]. In a report of 53 patients with mitral stenosis and significant TR who underwent balloon valvotomy, 27 (51 percent) had an improvement in the severity of TR that paralleled the decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressures [10]. The patients with an improvement in TR had a much higher prevalence of functional TR (85 versus 8 percent in those in whom TR did not improve).
●Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy – The effect of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy on severe TR was evaluated in an analysis of 27 patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension [12]. The severity of TR diminished in 19 (70 percent) without TV annuloplasty. Compared with the eight patients with persistent severe TR, those with diminished TR were more likely to have had a reduction in pulmonary artery systolic pressure below 40 mmHg. (See "Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy".)
Treatment of atrial fibrillation — There is an emerging concept that some patients have TR related to atrial dilation and atrial fibrillation without RV dilation or primary leaflet disease [13-17]. Rhythm control of atrial fibrillation may be helpful in these patients, although further studies are needed.
Management of pacemaker therapy — Strategies to avoid endocardial lead interference with native, repaired, or prosthetic valves include securing the leads in a commissure, securing them in a position outside the valve annulus, or replacement with epicardial leads [1,18].
Lead removal after development of moderate to severe TR and tricuspid annulus dilation may not reduce TR because the leaflet damage often is not reversible [19]. Also, in some patients the TR is secondary to RV pacing (possibly related to RV and/or LV dyssynchrony) rather than the pacer lead [20,21].
Pregnancy — Management of patients with valve disease (including TR) during pregnancy is discussed separately. (See "Pregnancy and valve disease".)
Physical activity and exercise — We agree with the 36th Bethesda Conference task force recommendation (published in 2005) that patients with primary TR with normal RV function, a right atrial pressure less than 20 mmHg, and normal RV systolic pressure can participate in all competitive sports, regardless of TR severity [22]. The 2015 task force statement does not discuss isolated TV disease [23].
Separate recommendations in a 2015 task force statement apply to patients with mitral and aortic valve lesions (who may have concurrent TR) [23]. Since multiple lesions of moderate severity may have additive effects, the 36th Bethesda Conference task force recommended that athletes with significant multiple valvular disease should generally not participate in any competitive sports.
Exercise in patients with functional TR may be limited by the underlying cause. (See "Tricuspid regurgitation: Etiology, clinical features, and evaluation", section on 'Secondary TR'.)
ROLE OF HEART VALVE TEAM —
Multispecialty heart valve team evaluation is performed to assess the need for TV intervention (transcatheter or surgical) in symptomatic patients with severe TR despite optimal management of HF. Reported outcomes and complication rates for these transcatheter and surgical procedures differ, but studies directly comparing these procedures are lacking. (See 'Transcatheter TV repair' below and 'Transcatheter TV replacement' below and 'Tricuspid valve surgery' below.)
TRICUSPID VALVE SURGERY —
TV surgery usually is performed at the time of surgery for left-sided heart disease. Isolated TV surgery is rarely performed with only 5005 procedures over a 10-year period (2004 to 2013) nationally in the United States [24]. Operative mortality for isolated TV surgery in the United States is 8.8 percent with a higher adjusted in-hospital mortality for tricuspid replacement compared with repair (odds ratio [OR]: 1.91; 95% CI 1.18-3.09) [24].
Indications — Indications for TV surgery depend upon whether surgery for left-sided (mitral or aortic) valve disease is indicated.
●For patients undergoing left-sided valve surgery:
•For patients with severe TR who are undergoing left-sided valve surgery, TV surgery is recommended [1,25]. The rationale is that primary or functional severe TR does not consistently improve (without tricuspid surgery) after treatment of a left-sided valve lesion [26,27].
•For patients with mild, moderate, or greater functional TR who are undergoing left-sided valve surgery, concomitant TV repair is suggested if there is either tricuspid annular dilation (diameter on TTE >40 mm) or prior evidence of right HF [1,25].
●Isolated tricuspid surgery – The optimum timing of isolated TV surgery is not well established [6,24,28,29], as reflected by some differences between AHA/ACC and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline recommendations [1,25].
•For patients with severe primary TR with symptoms unresponsive to medical therapy, we suggest TV surgery. In this setting, TV surgery may reduce symptoms and prevent recurrent hospitalization, preferably before the onset of significant RV dysfunction [1,30]. The 2021 ESC valvular guidelines include a strong recommendation for TV surgery in patients with symptomatic severe isolated primary TR without severe RV dysfunction [25].
•TV surgery can be beneficial to reduce symptoms and recurrent hospitalizations in patients with signs and symptoms of right-sided HF and severe isolated secondary TR attributable to annular dilation who are poorly responsive to medical therapy (in the absence of pulmonary hypertension or left-sided disease).
•The role of TV surgery in patients with severe TR with no or minimal symptoms is uncertain. The 2020 AHA/ACC valvular guidelines note this uncertainty and include a very weak recommendation that TV surgery may be considered for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with severe primary TR and progressive moderate or greater RV dilation and/or systolic dysfunction [1]. The ESC guidelines view surgery in this setting slightly more favorably and indicate that surgery should be considered in patients with severe primary or secondary TR with no symptoms and RV dilation [25].
•TV surgery may be considered in patients with signs and symptoms of right-sided HF and severe TR (Stage D) who have undergone previous left-sided valve surgery in the absence of severe pulmonary hypertension or severe RV systolic dysfunction [1].
Indications for surgery for TR in patients with Ebstein anomaly are discussed separately. (See "Ebstein anomaly: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)
At the time of left-sided valve surgery — Significant TR is common at the time of and following left heart valve (particularly mitral) surgery [31-34]. The rationale for TV repair in patients with TR at the time of left-sided valve surgery is to prevent progressive TR, to prevent or improve HF symptoms, and to reduce the risk of requiring later TV surgery, although an impact on survival has not been established [31,33]. Concomitant TV repair does not add appreciably to the mortality risk of mitral valve surgery. Reoperation for severe TR after left-sided valve surgery is associated with a 10 to 25 percent risk of perioperative mortality [1].
TV surgery at the time of left-sided valve surgery is suggested in patients at greatest risk for progressive TR (ie, those with functional TR with dilated tricuspid annulus or evidence of right HF), given the risk of TV surgery at a later date. Mild or moderate TR is expected to progress in approximately 25 percent of patients who have undergone left-sided valve surgery [1].
Observational studies indicate that the presence of significant pre-operative TR is a predictor of increased postoperative mortality [33] and development of significant TR late post-operatively is also associated with increased mortality rate [34]. Risk factors for persistence or progression of TR include tricuspid annulus dilation (diameter on TTE >40 mm or 21 mm/m2 diameter indexed to body surface area; or >70 mm diameter on direct operative measurement), RV dysfunction/remodeling, leaflet tethering height, pulmonary artery hypertension, atrial fibrillation, nonmyxomatous etiology of MR, and a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead across the tricuspid annulus [1].
A meta-analysis included 10 studies of 2488 patients found to have mild to moderate functional TR during mitral valve operations [35]. The duration of postoperative follow-up ranged from 3 to over 100 months (at least 12 months in all studies except one). Patients who underwent concurrent tricuspid annuloplasty had a lower likelihood (odds ratio 0.29; 95% CI 0.19-0.44) of progressing to moderate to severe TR. However, concurrent tricuspid annuloplasty was not associated with any significant difference in mortality rate or in the need for subsequent TV surgery.
A randomized trial in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for primary mitral regurgitation found that concomitant TV repair reduced the risk of progression of TR but resulted in more frequent permanent pacemaker implantation [36]. The 401 trial participants had either moderate TR or less than moderate TR with annular dilation of ≥40 mm (≥21 mm/m2) and were randomly assigned to undergo mitral valve surgery with or without TV repair. The two-year mortality rate was similar in the two groups (3.2 versus 4.5 percent; relative risk [RR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.25-1.88). Progression of TR at two years was less frequent in the patients who received TV repair (0.6 versus 6.1 percent; RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.69). However, the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in these patients (14.1 versus 2.5 percent; rate ratio 5.75, 95% CI 2.27-14.60).
Isolated tricuspid valve surgery — TV repair or replacement is performed to control regurgitation and thus improve or prevent symptoms. Medical therapy generally has limited efficacy in reducing regurgitant flow in patients with symptomatic TR, particularly if caused by intrinsic TV disease. Severe TR causes progressive RV dilatation, which may worsen TR and lead to RV dysfunction.
Observational data suggest that TV surgery can improve functional capacity [37-40]. As an example, among 926 consecutive patients who underwent TV surgery (792 repairs, 134 replacements) at a single center who were followed for a median of 4.3 years, either repair or replacement was associated with significant improvement in functional status, as measured by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (34 percent with NYHA class III or IV postoperatively, compared with 85 percent preoperatively) [40].
However, scant evidence is available on the impact of TV surgery on survival. In a propensity-score matched analysis of patients with isolated significant TR comparing 57 patients who underwent TV surgery with 813 who did not, survival was not significantly different between the groups [41].
TV surgery is associated with a high risk of atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation [42]. The risk is higher with surgical TV replacement than with surgical TV repair.
Timing and risk stratification — The timing of isolated TV surgery is controversial. One study suggested that TV surgery should be performed in patients with symptomatic TR before the development of RV end-systolic area ≥20 cm2 or anemia with hemoglobin ≤11.3 g/dL [37]. In a series of 61 patients undergoing isolated TV surgery for severe TR, preoperative hemoglobin level and RV end-systolic area were independent determinants of clinical outcomes (death or readmission) at a mean of 32 months. An RV end-systolic area <20 cm2 predicted event-free survival with a sensitivity of 73 percent and a specificity of 67 percent; a hemoglobin level >11.3 g/dL predicted event-free survival with a sensitivity of 73 percent and a specificity of 83 percent.
Risk stratification models are generally helpful in estimating operative risk for patients undergoing valve surgery. A risk score (TRI-SCORE, www.tri-score.com) has been proposed to predict in-hospital mortality after isolated TV surgery [43], as commonly used cardiac surgery risk scores do not directly address tricuspid surgery. The TRI-SCORE was derived from a study of 466 patients at 12 French centers. The risk score ranges from 0 to 12 points and is based on eight clinical parameters; observed and predicted in-hospital rates ranged from 0 to 60 percent and from 1 to 65 percent. The apparent area under the receiver operating curve was 0.81, higher than for the logistic Euroscore (0.67) and EuroSCORE II (0.63).
The EuroSCORE II risk model incorporates patient characteristics but does not provide procedure-specific risk estimates (http://euroscore.org/) [44,45]. The 2018 Society of Thoracic Surgeons model does not include risk estimates for TV surgery (https://acsdriskcalc.research.sts.org/) [46]. (See "Estimating the risk of valvular procedures".)
Surgical repair versus replacement — Although comparative data are limited, TV repair is generally preferred to TV replacement, with valve replacement performed only when repair is not feasible. Advantages of TV repair include technical ease and speed of operation. On the other hand, the rate of recurrent TR following tricuspid repair is substantial and the mortality risk of TV reoperation is high. (See 'Surgical valve repair' below.)
In observational series, operative mortality rates for tricuspid replacement are generally higher than those for tricuspid repair [47]. However, patients undergoing tricuspid replacement may have greater risk factors for mortality. A study using propensity-matched cohorts found that operative mortality was similar for TV repair (18 percent) and replacement (13 percent) [48]. Survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were similar for repair (80, 72, and 66 percent) and replacement (85, 79, and 49 percent).
Surgical valve repair — Tricuspid repair procedures include placement of a prosthetic annular ring, a biologic annuloplasty repair, or more complex repair procedures [49,50]. Recurrence rates and mortality after valve repair are different for primary versus secondary TR.
In a series of 178 adults with primary TR (largely rheumatic or congenital tricuspid disease undergoing tricuspid repair) a relatively low operative mortality (4 percent) and relatively high mid-term survival rates were observed (90 percent at five years and 76 percent at 10 years) [51]. In a retrospective study of 74 rheumatic heart disease patients undergoing TV repair at the time of mitral and/or aortic valve replacement, use of an annular ring (versus repair without a ring) was associated with decreased recurrence of TR, a higher quality of life, and improved survival [52]. At one week post repair, moderate to severe TR was observed in 2.5 percent with ring annuloplasty (versus 2.9 percent without a ring) and at one year was observed in 2.5 percent with ring annuloplasty (versus 17.6 percent without a ring).
Tricuspid repair is frequently performed for secondary TR, most often at the time of left-sided valve surgery and in the setting of other risk factors, such as impaired LV and/or RV function; outcomes reflect these associated risks:
●In adults with secondary TR operative mortality rates for TV repair have ranged from 6 to 14 percent in series in which most patients underwent concomitant surgery on another valve [47,53-55]. Mid- to long-term survival rates are limited with five-year survival of 64 to 72 percent and 10-year survival of 44 to 47 percent [47,54,55].
●Risk factors associated with worse postoperative TR have included worse preoperative TR, impaired LV systolic function, presence of a permanent pacemaker [54], and higher pulmonary artery pressure [53]. Despite high rates of TR recurrence, reoperation after tricuspid annuloplasty is rarely performed. Hospital mortality after repeat tricuspid surgery is high (eg, 37 percent in one series [54]).
●The choice of procedure to minimize recurrence of TR following TV repair is controversial. Residual TR following ring annuloplasty is seen in approximately 10 percent of patients five years after repair [1]. Some observational series have suggested that the risk of postoperative TR is lower with a prosthetic ring than with suture repair procedures [54,55]. As an example, in a series of 790 patients, the rate of at least moderate to severe (3+ to 4+) TR five years postoperatively was 16 to 18 percent in those with rings versus 28 to 32 percent in those without annular support [54].
On the other hand, some investigators have found similar rates of significant postoperative TR with ring and suture repairs. For example, in a series of 237 patients, the rate of at least moderate to severe (3+ to 4+) TR three years postoperatively was 14 percent for suture bicuspidization (plication of the posterior tricuspid leaflet) as compared with 17 percent for ring annuloplasty [53]. TV tethering is a risk factor for postoperative TR [56]. Measurement of tricuspid annulus diameter and tethering distances may be helpful in choosing repair procedures with a goal of improving outcomes [57]. In a long-term (14-year) outcome study of 96 patients who underwent a complex valve repair with placement of an annuloplasty ring, 96 percent of patients had no TR at hospital discharge with a 12-year survival of 72 percent and with a rate of recurrent moderate to severe TR of 28 percent [58].
In a meta-analysis of 87 studies published between 2005 and 2017 of 13,184 patients undergoing TV surgery for secondary TR, 92 percent of patients had a concurrent mitral valve procedure. The risk of moderate-severe TR at hospital discharge was 9.4 percent with late reintervention rates of 0.3 percent per year. Mortality and rates of recurrent TR were similar for suture versus ring annuloplasty but overall TR rate was higher after flexible versus rigid ring annuloplasty [59].
Surgical valve replacement — TV replacement may be required if leaflet anatomy is not amenable to repair.
●Outcomes of surgical valve replacement - Operative mortality rates for TV replacement in adults have generally been high (10 to 33 percent; 10 to 22 percent for series beginning after 1985) [37,38,47,60-63]. In these series, the majority of patients had concomitant surgery on another valve and/or prior valve surgery. Mid- to long-term survival following TV replacement has been limited with five-year survival rates of 60 to 74 percent and 10-year survival rates of 37 to 58 percent [47,60-62,64]. The etiology of TV dysfunction was not specified in most of these series.
Disparate mortality rates were observed in two studies of patients with primary (organic) TV disease. In a series of 72 patients with primary TV disease (largely rheumatic and congenital) undergoing valve replacement from 1979 to 2003, operative mortality was 22 percent, five-year survival was 63 percent, and 10-year survival was 55 percent [51]. In contrast, a study of patients with primary tricuspid disease (rheumatic, congenital, endocarditis, degenerative) undergoing valve replacement from 1994 to 2007 reported a much lower operative mortality rate (1.4 percent) and high five-year survival (95 percent) [63]. Possible explanations for the lower mortality in the later study include fewer comorbidities and improved perioperative care, which included routine ultrafiltration.
●Choice of prosthetic valve – For patients undergoing surgical TV replacement, the choice between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves is based upon factors including patient age, life expectancy, and concomitant need for anticoagulation. While there is a higher risk of valve thrombosis with a mechanical valve, bioprosthetic valves are associated with greater risk of recurrent moderate or greater TR during follow-up. Thus, for patients with longer life expectancy or concomitant need for anticoagulation, a mechanical valve is preferred.
These issues were illustrated by a single center study of 1043 consecutive adults (mean age 68.8 years) who underwent first-time surgical TV replacement between 1993 and 2018, nearly all (94 percent) for severe TR [65]. A mechanical valve was used in 14 percent and a bioprosthetic valve in 86 percent. Most of the patients (57 percent) underwent a concomitant cardiac procedure (eg, other valve replacements). Overall survival at 5 and 10 years were 50 and 30 percent. Cumulative incidences of reoperation at 5 and 10 years were 2.6 and 3.7 percent. In patients with mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, adjusted rates of survival and reoperation were similar.
TRANSCATHETER TV INTERVENTION —
Transcatheter TV interventions include transcatheter TV repair and transcatheter TV replacement. Data directly comparing these procedures are lacking. In early reports, higher rates of symptom improvement and reduction in TR have been reported with transcatheter TV replacement than reported in separate studies of transcatheter TV repair. However, higher rates of complications have been reported with transcatheter TV replacement, including risk of 30-day mortality (1.7 percent [66] and 3.5 percent [67]) and risk of requiring a new permanent pacemaker (13 percent [66] and 17.8 percent [67]). (See 'Transcatheter TV repair' below and 'Transcatheter TV replacement' below.)
Transcatheter TV repair — Devices for transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (TEER) are approved for use in Europe (Triclip 2020, PASCAL 2020) and in the United States (Triclip, 2024) [68]. Studies have investigated the efficacy of treating TR with transcatheter approaches similar to those used for mitral valve disease, with either a clip on the valve leaflets or an annular remodeling device [66,69-71]; the approved devices are clips. These transcatheter approaches require advanced imaging modalities for patient selection and procedural guidance [72-74].
An open-label trial randomly assigned 350 symptomatic patients (mean age 78 years) with severe TR to TEER or continued medical management [75]. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was III or IV in 57.4 percent of enrolled patients. A mean of 2.2 clips were implanted per patient. At 30 days, the percentage of patients with moderate or less TR was higher in the TEER group compared with the control group (87.0 versus 4.8 percent). Death occurred at similar rates in the TEER group and control group (9.4 versus 10.6 percent). At one year, quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) increased by 12.3 points in the TEER group versus 0.6 points in the control group, and the percentage of patients in NYHA functional class I or II was higher in the TEER group than in the control group (83.9 versus 59.5 percent). The incidences of death or TV surgery (1.8 versus 3.6 percent) and the rates of hospitalization for HF (0.21 versus 0.17 events per patient-year) were similar in the two groups.
Rates of cardiac electronic rhythm device (permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter–defibrillator) implantation at one year were the same in the TEER and control groups (both 2.9 percent).
Transcatheter TV replacement — A transcatheter TV replacement (TTVR system [EVOQUE]) is approved for use in Europe (2023) and the United States (2024) [76]. Early clinical outcomes for this system were described by a prospective single-arm study of 176 patients (mean age 78.7) with at least moderate symptomatic TR despite medical therapy [66]. Most of the patients had severe TR (88 percent) and/or NYHA functional class III or IV symptoms (75.4 percent). At one year, TR was mild or less in nearly all patients (97.6 percent) and NYHA functional class was I or II in most patients (93.3 percent). Mortality was 9.1 percent, and 10.2 percent of patients were hospitalized for HF.
The efficacy and safety of TTVR were assessed in an international trial which enrolled 400 patients with severe TR with associated symptoms and/or hospitalization for associated HF despite medical therapy [67]. The participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either TTVR plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone. The majority of patients (73 percent) had secondary TR; the remainder had primary TR (defined to include TR related to a device lead), mixed TR, or indeterminate TR.
●The Kaplan–Meier estimates (mean±SE) for death from any cause at one year were 12.6±2.1 percent in the valve replacement group and 15.2±3.3 percent in the control group. For hospitalization for HF, the estimates were 20.9±2.6 and 26.1±4.1 percent, respectively.
●KCCQ-OS scores were higher in the TTVR group compared with the control group during serial follow-up: at 30 days by 11.8 points (95% CI 7.4-16.3), six months by 20.8 points (95% CI 16.1-25.5), and one year by 17.8 points (95% CI 13.0-22.5 points) [77]. Subgroup analyses found greater health status improvement with TTVR in patients with torrential or massive TR compared with those with severe TR (treatment effect 23.3 versus 22.6 versus 11.3).
●On echocardiography at one year, most of the patients (72.6 percent) in the valve replacement group had no residual TR, 22.6 percent had mild TR, 3.8 percent had moderate TR, and 0.9 percent had severe TR. Among the patients in the control group, residual regurgitation was mild in 2.3 percent, moderate in 13.8 percent, severe in 41.4 percent, massive in 19.5 percent, and torrential in 23.0 percent.
●At 30 days, the rate of death from any cause was 3.5 percent in the transcatheter valve replacement group and none in the control group; severe bleeding occurred in 10.4 and 1.5 percent, respectively. Safety issues with transcatheter valve replacement at one year included severe bleeding (15.4 versus 5.3 percent in the control group) and implantation of a new permanent pacemaker (17.8 versus 2.3 percent), with higher rates in patients without a preexisting pacemaker (27.8 versus 3.8 percent).
●Limitations of the study include short duration of follow-up and lack of blinding of data review by the clinical events committee and echocardiographic core laboratory.
PROGNOSIS
Impact of severity on prognosis — While the clinical setting (particularly concomitant cardiovascular disease) influences survival in patients with TR, increasing grades of TR are independent predictors of mortality in populations of individuals with and without left heart disease [41,78-82], as illustrated by the following studies:
●In a study of 439,558 adults (mean age 62) undergoing evaluation for heart disease from 2000 to 2019 by 25 centers contributing to the National Echocardiography Database of Australia, 29.1 percent of the patients had at least mild TR [82]. After adjustment for age, sex, RV systolic pressure, atrial fibrillation, and significant left heart disease, the risk of mortality was independently associated with mild TR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.23-1.26), moderate TR (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.68-1.75), or severe TR (HR 2.65, 95% CI 2.57-2.73) compared with those with no or trivial TR. Increasing grades of TR were also independently associated with increasing risk of cardiovascular mortality.
●In a study of 5223 patients (mean age 67 years) at three Veterans Affairs medical centers, one-year survival rates were 92, 90, 79, and 64 percent in patient groups with no, mild, moderate, or severe TR, respectively [78]. Moderate or greater TR was associated with increased mortality regardless of pulmonary artery systolic pressure or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Severe TR, older age, lower LVEF, inferior vena cava dilation, and moderate or greater RV enlargement were associated with impaired survival.
●Similarly, in a study of 296 patients with TR, those with the highest tertile of quantitative TR measurements (vena contracta >6 mm, effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) >0.3 cm2, regurgitant volume >30 mL, and regurgitant fraction >45 percent) had higher rates of adverse events (death and HF) [79]. Event-free survival rates were 93, 48, and 14 percent in patients with mild, moderate, and severe TR.
Prognosis of severe TR — Even among patients with severe TR, patients with greater TR may have worse outcomes, as illustrated by a study of 284 patients with severe TR in which those with a vena contracta >0.92 cm (termed massive TR) had higher mortality rates [81].
Patients with severe TR commonly have left-sided valve disease, which impacts prognosis. Patients with severe TR without significant left-sided valve disease also have an adverse prognosis, as illustrated by a study of 613 patients with isolated severe TR (mean age 74 years) [83]. During 26.5 months median follow-up, 141 (23.3 percent) died and 62 (10.2 percent) were hospitalized for HF. Adverse prognostic factors included pulmonary hypertension, elevated blood urea nitrogen levels, decreased albumin levels, and left atrial enlargement.
SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS —
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Cardiac valve disease".)
INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS —
UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.
Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or e-mail these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)
Basics topics (see "Patient education: Tricuspid regurgitation (The Basics)")
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
●Approach to management – In symptomatic patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR), management includes evaluation and treatment of the underlying cause(s), which often includes other cardiovascular disorders, particularly mitral valve disease and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (heart failure [HF] with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). (See 'Considerations for management' above.)
●Management of heart failure – In symptomatic patients with severe TR, diuretics are indicated to treat volume overload and congestion. However, many patients with severe TR have refractory peripheral edema unresponsive to medical management. (See 'Management of heart failure' above.)
●Management of pulmonary hypertension – Treatment of the causes of pulmonary hypertension (such as HF, mitral stenosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease) can result in improvement in secondary TR. (See 'Treatment of causes of pulmonary hypertension' above.)
●Management of pacemaker lead associated TR – Management of symptomatic TR associated with a pacer lead is problematic. TR often persists after lead removal. (See 'Management of pacemaker therapy' above.)
●Patients undergoing cardiac surgery for a concurrent condition
•For patients with severe primary TR undergoing surgery for left-sided (eg, mitral) valve disease, tricuspid surgery is recommended (Grade 1C). (See 'At the time of left-sided valve surgery' above.)
•For patients with mild, moderate, or greater secondary TR who are undergoing left-sided valve surgery, we suggest concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair if there is either tricuspid annular dilation (diameter on transthoracic echocardiogram [TTE] >40 mm) or prior evidence of right HF (Grade 2C).
●Intervention for TR without concomitant procedure – For symptomatic patients with refractory severe primary TR despite optimal management of HF and without severe right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction, we suggest TV intervention (Grade 2C). In this setting, TV intervention may improve symptoms but has not been shown to prolong life. Options for TV intervention include transcatheter TV repair, transcatheter TV replacement (TTVR), and TV surgery (repair or replacement). Reported outcomes and complication rates for these procedures differ, but studies directly comparing these procedures are lacking. (See 'Tricuspid valve surgery' above and 'Transcatheter TV intervention' above.)
●Prognosis – Increasing grades of TR are independent predictors of mortality in populations of individuals with and without left heart disease. (See 'Prognosis' above.)
