ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Laser and light therapy of lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins

Laser and light therapy of lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Sep 28, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Telangiectasias and reticular veins are common venous abnormalities and are often a source of significant distress to the patient whether or not symptoms are present. The treatment of telangiectasias and reticular veins with lasers or light therapy is reviewed here. Other modalities used to treat these entities are discussed separately. (See "Overview of lower extremity chronic venous disease" and "Injection sclerotherapy techniques for the treatment of telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins".)

INDICATIONS — Telangiectasias, reticular veins, and varicose veins are the visible signs of chronic venous disease and can occur in the presence or absence of either symptoms or an underlying functional venous disorder (reflux) [1]. Sclerotherapy is the treatment of choice for the majority of superficial leg veins. When sclerotherapy is administered sequentially from deep to superficial and from larger to smaller veins, over 90 percent of vessels can be successfully treated [2]. Candidates for laser and light therapy are those who do not tolerate or fail sclerotherapy or who have small superficial vessels that are too small to cannulate with a sclerotherapy needle [3,4]. (See "Injection sclerotherapy techniques for the treatment of telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins".)

Asymptomatic patients with telangiectasias or reticular veins often find the cosmetic appearance of their veins distressing. In the absence of signs of venous reflux, laser and light therapy can be performed after physical examination. The clinical evaluation of the patient with chronic venous disease is discussed separately. (See "Clinical manifestations of lower extremity chronic venous disease".)

Because vein recurrence rates are increased in the presence of superficial venous reflux, reflux is managed prior to treatment. Treatment with laser and light therapy is most effective for small vessels (1 to 2 mm in diameter), although vessels up to 5 mm in diameter can be treated. Larger veins do not respond as well [5-7]. (See "Overview of lower extremity chronic venous disease", section on 'Diagnosis'.)

CONTRAINDICATIONS — Laser and light therapy should not be performed in patients who have signs of acute thrombosis/phlebitis, due to the increased risk of deep venous thrombosis. Pregnant patients should defer until after delivery.

Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (ankle-brachial index ≤0.9) are also contraindications because these conditions are associated with an increased risk of nonhealing wounds.

In addition, laser and light therapy may cause hyperpigmentation, which is usually temporary but can last up to a year, and hypopigmentation, which may be permanent. Both these side effects are most common in patients with tan skin and in Fitzpatrick skin types III, IV, V, and VI. A test spot is undertaken prior to treatment (table 1). (See 'Pigmentation' below.)

PATIENT COUNSELING — The decision to offer laser or light therapy depends upon symptoms, extent of lower extremity disease, patient expectations, and likelihood of providing a durable benefit either with respect to appearance or improvement in symptoms.

Patients should be counseled carefully prior to treatment. The patient is informed that veins will lighten and become less noticeable but may not completely disappear. Multiple treatments are typically required to achieve the desired effect, and alteration in skin pigmentation can occur.

For all patients, it is important to address patient expectations and potential complications and to document veins photographically prior to each treatment. These photographs should be reviewed with the patient periodically.

LASER/LIGHT PRINCIPLES — Lasers emit a single, coherent wavelength of light, while intense pulsed light (IPL) sources emit white light from 515 to 1200 nm that is usually filtered to certain broad wavelengths (figure 1).

Laser therapy of venous structures is based on the concept of selective photothermolysis (ie, selective thermal confinement of light-induced damage) [8-10]. Pulsed lasers and light sources heat the target tissue, inducing thermal injury with limited damage to the surrounding structures. The wavelength of light is chosen based upon the chromophore (the part of a molecule responsible for its color) of the target structure and the depth of the vessel. The oxyhemoglobin contained within red blood cells has three major absorption peaks at 418, 542, and 577 nm, with an additional infrared absorption around 1000 nm (figure 2). Green, yellow, and infrared laser and light sources are effectively absorbed by leg veins.

The selected duration of the light pulse determines the size of the vessel that will respond to treatment. Shorter pulses selectively heat smaller vessels (<2 mm), and longer pulse duration light sources are effective for slightly larger vessels [11].

Other parameters, such as fluence (energy density), spot size, and cooling, are also important factors. (See "Basic principles of medical lasers", section on 'Tissue ablation'.)

LASER AND LIGHT SOURCES — No single laser type is used to treat the variety of vascular abnormalities seen in clinical practice. The specific laser selected for an individual patient depends upon the size and depth of the vessels to be treated (table 2) [1]. Patient skin phototype is also important (table 1) [12].

Pulse dye laser — Pulse dye lasers (PDLs) emit light at 585 and 595 nm at pulse durations of 0.45 to 40 msecs. The yellow wavelength matches the third oxyhemoglobin peak (figure 3). PDLs are most effective for treating small lower extremity veins less than 1.5 mm in diameter in light skin type patients (table 2).

Potassium titanyl phosphate laser — Potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) lasers emit light at 532 nm at pulse durations in the millisecond range (figure 3). The green wavelength matches the second oxyhemoglobin peak overlapping the absorption peak of melanin. Veins with diameters ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mm can be effectively treated in light skin type patients (table 2).

Diode laser — Diode lasers emit light at a single wavelength between 800 and 900 nm, penetrating more deeply and with less absorption by melanin than PDL and KTP lasers [13]. Veins up to 4 mm in diameter can be treated using this laser (figure 3). Diode lasers with a 900 nm wavelength have been used in conjunction with radiofrequency current [14]. The combination is an effective treatment for lower extremity veins. The diode laser can also be augmented with intravenous injection of indocyanine green, which enhances light absorption [15,16]. The diode laser should be limited to skin types I to IV (table 2) [12].

Nd:YAG laser — Neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers emit light at a wavelength of 1064 nm, at pulse durations in the millisecond range (figure 3). This longer wavelength penetrates to deeper levels and, with long pulse durations, can be used to treat veins from 0.3 to 3 mm in diameter. Because of lower absorption in pigment, Nd:YAG lasers are less likely to cause pigmentary changes and are safer to use in darker skin types (table 2) [12,17].

Alexandrite laser — Alexandrite lasers emit light at a wavelength of 755 nm with a pulse duration in the millisecond range (figure 3). The wavelength corresponds to absorption by deoxygenated hemoglobin but also to absorption by melanin. Lower extremity veins may respond, but this laser should be limited to nontanned skin types I, II, and III (table 2) [12].

Intense pulsed light sources — Intense pulsed light (IPL) sources emit white light from 515 to 1200 nm, but it is usually filtered to certain broad wavelengths. IPL sources are most effective for superficial, red telangiectasias <1 mm in diameter in fair-skin individuals (table 2).

TECHNIQUE — Once the laser or light source and area to be treated have been selected, the patient is placed in a comfortable position, and protective eyewear is given to the patient and all personnel in the room. The use of eye protection is essential, and when operating class 4 lasers (includes most medical lasers), it is required in the workplace by the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) [18]. The laser safety glasses need to have the appropriate optical density for the wavelength of the laser being used. This eye protection is important, as accidental laser exposure can cause irreversible damage to the eye.

Detailed treatment parameters for each of the devices listed above are beyond the scope of this topic but can be found in specialty reviews [4]. The parameters for treatment are entered into the laser/light control panel, and treatment proceeds by first cooling the skin over the vessels and then activating the laser/light over the target vessel(s). The patient will feel anything from a very mild sting to a strong pinching and burning sensation when the laser is activated. The application of a topical anesthetic agent can be used to lessen pain. (See 'Adverse reactions' below.)

A visible clearing of the vein should be seen, but if not, the vessel can be treated again or the laser parameters adjusted to improve the effect. To avoid burns, no more than three attempts should be tried over the same area of skin at one visit.

FOLLOW-UP CARE — No dressings are needed. Application of compression bandages is suggested by some, but not all, practitioners. The patient may return to his/her normal daily activities immediately, including work. There is no evidence that avoiding exercise leads to better results. Patients should avoid sun exposure to the treated areas. Alternatively, sunscreen with a high sun protection factor (SPF 30) may be applied to the treated areas.

Vessels may need more than one treatment to achieve optimum results, and repeat therapy is generally performed within four to six weeks. There is some evidence, at least with long pulsed Nd:YAG lasers, that waiting eight weeks between treatments yields more improvement per treatment.

ADVERSE REACTIONS — Common local reactions associated with laser therapy include pain, redness, swelling, bruising, and itching. These are transient and usually resolve quickly. More significant adverse reactions include telangiectatic matting, pigmentation changes, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, ulceration, thrombophlebitis, and scarring.

Pain — Treatment is usually well tolerated. Pain is short lived and usually lasts only seconds to minutes after treatment. The application of a topical anesthetic (eg, EMLA cream, EleMax, 30% xylocaine gel, 7% lidocaine, 7% tetracaine) for 30 to 60 minutes prior to the procedure can lessen the degree of pain [19].

Bruising — Purpura and ecchymosis are due to vessel wall rupture resulting in leakage of blood into the surrounding tissue. These reactions are most likely to occur with short pulsed laser treatments (eg, PDL) and usually occur within minutes of treatment. Post-treatment bruising is a significant drawback for the alexandrite and long PDL lasers (table 2) [9,12].

Pigmentation — Hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation are common in patients with Fitzpatrick skin type III, IV, V, or VI and usually develop within three weeks after treatment. Hyperpigmentation, which is due to hemosiderin deposition, is usually temporary but may last up to one year or can be permanent. Hypopigmentation may also be permanent.

Telangiectatic matting — As with sclerotherapy, telangiectatic matting consists of multiple, fine dilated vessels in the area of laser treatment (picture 1). Telangiectatic matting will improve over time in many patients. However, occasionally matting occurs when there is an untreated feeding reticular vein, which should be sought out and treated with sclerotherapy, if present.

Thrombophlebitis — Thrombosis has been reported in the superficial veins following laser therapy. It may take up to six weeks to resolve but rarely has sequelae. Deep vein thrombosis is exceedingly rare and is more likely related to factors not directly associated with the technique. Superficial thrombophlebitis is discussed in detail separately. (See "Superficial vein thrombosis and phlebitis of the lower extremity veins".)

OUTCOMES — Few trials are available comparing different types of lasers and light sources to each other for the treatment of lower extremity venous disease [12,14]. In observational studies, the long-pulsed neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser appears to be the best device as a single-laser modality in the treatment of lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins [20-22]. Use of the Nd:YAG laser results in clearance of more than 75 percent of veins in the majority of sites, and results are maintained for at least 12 months following treatment [12,17,22]. However, in one study, histologic specimens three months post-therapy showed recanalization, suggesting there may be a risk for vein recurrence [23]. Optimal laser settings continue to be evaluated. Combinations of lasers have also been used [24].

The value of the Nd:YAG laser was illustrated in a prospective study of 22 patients that evaluated vessel clearance rates of the Nd:YAG compared with either the alexandrite or diode laser in the treatment of vessels ranging from 0.3 to 3 mm [12]. Thirty-six sets of comparable sites were treated. Greater than 75 percent improvement at three months of follow-up was observed at 88 percent of the Nd:YAG sites, compared with 29 percent of the diode sites and 33 percent of the alexandrite sites.

Variable clearance rates are observed with other laser modalities and depend upon the size and depth of the vessels treated. Most studies are small, and the best results are seen in groups of patients with uniform vessel size selected specifically for the strength of a given laser type. Clearance of >75 percent of vessels treated ranges from 10 percent of patients using the diode laser (800 nm) [25] to 93 percent of patients with the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser [26].

Laser versus sclerotherapy — In spite of improved laser technology, sclerotherapy remains the treatment of choice for lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins. Sclerotherapy clearly works better on larger veins, such as the reticular veins and larger spider veins, while laser/light therapy is more beneficial for smaller telangiectasias. As such, they are complimentary procedures.

Three small, observational studies have compared laser with sclerotherapy for the treatment of telangiectasias: one concluded that laser therapy was less effective and more expensive than sclerotherapy [3], the second demonstrated no differences in the clearance of veins by objective measures (however, patients still favored sclerotherapy [27]), and the third evaluated combined laser and sclerotherapy approaches and determined that clearance of veins was improved with sclerotherapy followed by laser, compared with either laser followed by sclerotherapy, laser alone, or sclerotherapy alone [13]. Another study directly compared sclerotherapy using polidocanol with laser (1064 nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet [Nd-YAG]) for the treatment of leg telangiectasias [28]. A blinded assessment of the outcomes of treatment found a high (>70 percent) and equal improvement after either treatment. However, the 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser treatment was associated with more pain.

COST — Laser therapy of telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins is generally considered a cosmetic treatment and is not typically covered by insurance.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Chronic venous disorders".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Dilated veins can occur in the presence or absence of either symptoms or an underlying functional venous disorder. Telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins can cause symptoms and are often a source of significant distress to the patient even in the absence of symptoms. (See 'Introduction' above.)

The presence of lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, or small varicose veins in the lower extremities may indicate an underlying functional venous disorder, especially when associated with symptoms (aching, swelling, heaviness). (See "Overview of lower extremity chronic venous disease".)

Symptomatic patients with lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, or small varicose veins should undergo further evaluation with venous duplex to identify the presence of superficial or deep venous insufficiency, which alters treatment options. (See "Overview of lower extremity chronic venous disease", section on 'Diagnosis'.)

Laser therapy is the only option for treatment of telangiectasias too small to access with a needle, patients allergic to sclerosing agents or afraid of needles, or those who have failed sclerotherapy. (See 'Indications' above.)

We suggest laser therapy over sclerotherapy for treatment of telangiectatic matting resulting from either prior sclerotherapy or saphenous ablation (Grade 2C). (See 'Laser versus sclerotherapy' above.)

We avoid laser therapy of lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, or small varicose veins in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III, IV, V, and VI due to the risk of hypopigmentation. (See 'Adverse reactions' above.)

Common local adverse reactions to laser treatment include pain, bruising, altered skin pigmentation, and telangiectatic matting. The incidence of these reactions depends upon the laser/light modality chosen and patient skin type. (See 'Adverse reactions' above.)

We suggest the use of the neodymium-doped: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser over other laser types for the treatment of most lower extremity telangiectasias, reticular veins, and small varicose veins (Grade 2C). The Nd:YAG laser is effective for treatment over a wider range of vein diameters and depths with fewer adverse reactions. (See 'Outcomes' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENT — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges Deborah Greenberg, MD, FACP, who contributed to earlier versions of this topic review.

  1. Chiesa R, Marone EM, Limoni C, et al. Chronic venous disorders: correlation between visible signs, symptoms, and presence of functional disease. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46:322.
  2. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatology Series: Treatment of leg veins, Alam, M, Nguyen (Eds), Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia 2006.
  3. Lupton JR, Alster TS, Romero P. Clinical comparison of sclerotherapy versus long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser treatment for lower extremity telangiectases. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28:694.
  4. McCoppin HH, Hovenic WW, Wheeland RG. Laser treatment of superficial leg veins: a review. Dermatol Surg 2011; 37:729.
  5. Dover JS, Sadick NS, Goldman MP. The role of lasers and light sources in the treatment of leg veins. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25:328.
  6. Hsu, J. Leg vein management. In: Atlas of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2, Kaminer, MS, Dover, JS, Arndt, KA (Eds), Harcourt Saunders, Philadelphia 2009. p.455.
  7. Weiss RA, Dover JS. Laser surgery of leg veins. Dermatol Clin 2002; 20:19.
  8. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 1983; 220:524.
  9. Kunishige JH, Goldberg LH, Friedman PM. Laser therapy for leg veins. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25:454.
  10. Wollina U, Schmidt WD, Hercogova J, Fassler D. Laser therapy of spider leg veins. J Cosmet Dermatol 2003; 2:166.
  11. Alora MB, Stern RS, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Comparison of the 595 nm long-pulse (1.5 msec) and ultralong-pulse (4 msec) lasers in the treatment of leg veins. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25:445.
  12. Eremia S, Li C, Umar SH. A side-by-side comparative study of 1064 nm Nd:YAG, 810 nm diode and 755 nm alexandrite lasers for treatment of 0.3-3 mm leg veins. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28:224.
  13. Levy JL, Berwald C. Treatment of vascular abnormalities with a long-pulse diode at 980 nm. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2004; 6:217.
  14. Trelles MA, Martín-Vázquez M, Trelles OR, Mordon SR. Treatment effects of combined radio-frequency current and a 900 nm diode laser on leg blood vessels. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38:185.
  15. Klein A, Buschmann M, Babilas P, et al. Indocyanine green-augmented diode laser therapy vs. long-pulsed Nd:YAG (1064 nm) laser treatment of telangiectatic leg veins: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol 2013; 169:365.
  16. Klein A, Bäumler W, Koller M, et al. Indocyanine green-augmented diode laser therapy of telangiectatic leg veins: a randomized controlled proof-of-concept trial. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 44:369.
  17. Omura NE, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Kauvar AN. Treatment of reticular leg veins with a 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48:76.
  18. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. www.osha.gov (Accessed on March 31, 2009).
  19. Chen JZ, Alexiades-Armenakas MR, Bernstein LJ, et al. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating the S-Caine Peel for induction of local anesthesia before long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser therapy for leg veins. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29:1012.
  20. Sadick NS. Long-term results with a multiple synchronized-pulse 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of leg venulectasias and reticular veins. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27:365.
  21. Trelles MA, Allones I, Martín-Vázquez MJ, et al. Long pulse Nd:YAG laser for treatment of leg veins in 40 patients with assessments at 6 and 12 months. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 35:68.
  22. Bernstein EF, Kornbluth S, Brown DB, Black J. Treatment of spider veins using a 10 millisecond pulse-duration frequency-doubled neodymium YAG laser. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25:316.
  23. Sadick NS, Prieto VG, Shea CR, et al. Clinical and pathophysiologic correlates of 1064-nm Nd:Yag laser treatment of reticular veins and venulectasias. Arch Dermatol 2001; 137:613.
  24. Trelles MA, Weiss R, Moreno-Moragas J, et al. Treatment of leg veins with combined pulsed dye and Nd:YAG lasers: 60 patients assessed at 6 months. Lasers Surg Med 2010; 42:609.
  25. Trelles MA, Allones I, Alvarez J, et al. The 800-nm diode laser in the treatment of leg veins: assessment at 6 months. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 54:282.
  26. Fournier N, Brisot D, Mordon S. Treatment of leg telangiectases with a 532 nm KTP laser in multipulse mode. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28:564.
  27. Coles CM, Werner RS, Zelickson BD. Comparative pilot study evaluating the treatment of leg veins with a long pulse ND:YAG laser and sclerotherapy. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 30:154.
  28. Parlar B, Blazek C, Cazzaniga S, et al. Treatment of lower extremity telangiectasias in women by foam sclerotherapy vs. Nd:YAG laser: a prospective, comparative, randomized, open-label trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29:549.
Topic 8176 Version 21.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟