ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Feb 22, 2022.

INTRODUCTION — Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), also known as multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block, is a rare neuropathy characterized by progressive, asymmetric weakness and atrophy without sensory abnormalities, a presentation similar to that of motor neuron disease. This review will discuss the clinical aspects of MMN. Other immune-mediated neuropathies are discussed separately. (See "Immune-mediated neuropathies".)

PATHOGENESIS — MMN is considered an immune-mediated disorder given the following observations [1-3]:

Clinical improvement with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) therapy

The presence of anti-GM1 antibodies in many but not all patients

A perivascular lymphocytic infiltration observed on nerve biopsy in some reports

However, it is unclear whether anti-GM1 antibodies are involved in the pathogenesis of MMN or are merely an epiphenomenon of the disease [3,4]. Elevated titers of anti-GM1 antibodies may be seen in 30 to 80 percent of patients [2,5-7]. There are several reports of patients developing MMN after treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) antibodies (eg, infliximab, adalimumab, ixekizumab) [8,9].

Although MMN is associated with conduction block on electrodiagnostic studies, segmental nerve demyelination is not a consistent feature of MMN, and some degree of axonal loss is often present [3]. One hypothesis is that the conduction block may be caused by an antibody-mediated attack affecting sodium channels and other nerve components at the nodes of Ranvier [10,11].

EPIDEMIOLOGY — MMN is a rare condition. The estimated prevalence of MMN is 0.6 to 2 per 100,000 population [4,12]. Males are affected more frequently than females, with a ratio of 2.7:1 [12]. Disease onset usually occurs between ages 20 to 50 years, with a mean onset ranging from age 30 to 40 years [4]. Although rare, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG)-responsive MMN has been described in children as well [13].

CLINICAL FEATURES — The typical clinical presentation of MMN is one of subacute onset with asymmetric weakness [1]. Lower motor neuron signs often present in a bibrachial pattern, producing arm and hand weakness without associated sensory loss [5,14]. The weakness usually begins as a focal mononeuropathy affecting the distal arms; wrist drop and hand weakness are common initial symptoms [15]. However, MMN can also present in the legs.

The neuronal involvement in MMN is typically patchy, with some nerves unaffected and others severely involved. In one series of 88 patients, onset of muscle weakness involving the distal arm or distal leg was noted in 61 and 34 percent of patients, respectively [12]. In patients with arm onset, progression usually involves spread of the weakness to the contralateral arm followed by the legs [1]. Some patients develop fasciculations or cramps. Muscle atrophy occurs late in the course of the disease. Deep tendon reflexes are variably affected, being decreased in most cases but normal or brisk (but not pathologic) in others [12]. Cranial nerves, bulbar muscles, and respiratory muscles are most often spared in MMN.

Motor nerve conduction studies often show evidence of conduction block, representing focal demyelination. Sensory conduction through the same segment of nerve is normal. (See "Overview of nerve conduction studies", section on 'Conduction block'.)

DIAGNOSIS — The diagnosis of MMN is suspected on the basis of a compatible clinical presentation with progressive, usually asymmetric weakness without sensory abnormalities, upper motor neuron signs, or bulbar involvement. The diagnosis is supported by nerve conduction studies that demonstrate focal demyelination and conduction block (see "Overview of nerve conduction studies", section on 'Conduction block') in motor nerves and normal sensory nerves [1]. However, some patients have a similar clinical disorder but lack conduction block on nerve conduction studies, and this has been termed multifocal motor neuropathy without conduction block (MMNWOCB) [14,16-18]. Other findings that support the diagnosis include finding abnormal A waves on electrodiagnostic studies [19], axonal sprouting in motor nerve biopsies [20], and abnormal hyperintense T2 signal and fascicular enlargement in affected nerves on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) neurography [21,22]. In these patients who lack conduction block, responsiveness to treatment with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is another supportive feature for the diagnosis of MMN [3,14,23].

Of note, conduction block can be missed on routine nerve conduction studies, particularly if demyelination is proximal or patchy [1]. Therefore, an extensive survey of multiple nerves in upper and lower limbs should be performed using proximal stimulation (Erb's point) and late responses (F waves and H reflex) to assess proximal nerve segments. (See "Overview of nerve conduction studies", section on 'Late responses'.)

Cerebrospinal fluid is acellular, and protein is typically normal.

Diagnostic criteria — Diagnostic criteria for MMN have been proposed by the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) [24].

The two core criteria for MMN (both must be present) are [24]:

Slowly progressive or stepwise progressive, focal, asymmetric limb weakness; that is, motor involvement in the motor nerve distribution of at least two nerves, for more than one month. If symptoms and signs are present only in the distribution of one nerve, only a possible diagnosis can be made.

No objective sensory abnormalities except for minor vibration sense abnormalities in the lower limbs.

Supportive clinical criteria are as follows [24]:

Predominant upper limb involvement

Decreased or absent tendon reflexes in the affected limb

Absence of cranial nerve involvement

Cramps and fasciculations in the affected limb

Response in terms of disability or muscle strength to immunomodulatory treatment

Exclusion criteria are the following [24]:

Upper motor neuron signs

Marked bulbar involvement

Sensory impairment more marked than minor vibration loss in the lower limbs

Diffuse symmetric weakness during the initial weeks

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS — The differential diagnosis of MMN primarily involves conditions that cause progressive limb weakness and atrophy without sensory loss and without upper motor neuron or bulbar manifestations [24].

The main consideration in the differential diagnosis is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease. (See "Clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other forms of motor neuron disease" and "Diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other forms of motor neuron disease".)

In addition, the differential includes the lower motor neuron variants of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis:

Progressive muscular atrophy (see "Clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other forms of motor neuron disease", section on 'Progressive muscular atrophy')

Flail arm syndrome (see "Clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other forms of motor neuron disease", section on 'Flail arm syndrome')

Flail leg syndrome (see "Clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other forms of motor neuron disease", section on 'Flail leg syndrome')

Other considerations in the differential diagnosis of MMN include the following [24]:

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (see "Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Etiology, clinical features, and diagnosis")

Multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (see "Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: Etiology, clinical features, and diagnosis", section on 'Asymmetric sensorimotor (multifocal)')

Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (see "Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: Genetics, clinical features, and diagnosis", section on 'Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy')

TREATMENT — MMN is treatable with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) [12,14,25-29]. We suggest IVIG 2 g/kg, given over two to five days, for initial treatment of patients with MMN who require treatment due to disease progression or disability [30]. Our preferred regimen is 0.4 g/kg daily for five consecutive days. This recommendation is consistent with current guidelines from the European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) and the American Academy of Neurology [24,28].

The benefit of IVIG for MMN has been demonstrated in several small randomized controlled trials [25-28,31]. As an example, a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial evaluated IVIG (0.5 g/kg per day for five consecutive days once a month for three months) versus placebo in 18 patients with MMN [25]. At four months, seven of nine patients who received IVIG responded, compared with two of nine patients treated with placebo. A 2022 systematic review of three placebo-controlled treatment trials in patients with MMN found that initial therapy with IVIG may improve muscle strength (78 versus 4 percent; risk ratio [RR] 11.0, 95% CI 2.9-42.3) and functional disability (39 versus 11 percent; RR 3.0, 95% CI 0.9-10.1) [32]. However, the certainty of the evidence was low, owing to the small number of patients and variability in outcome measures used. Although data are less compelling, subcutaneous immune globulin (SCIG) therapy may also be beneficial for MMN, as reported in a meta-analysis that included mainly small observational studies [33].

Most patients experience a fairly rapid improvement in weakness with IVIG. Muscles that show the greatest initial weakness have the largest response [34]. However, the improvement is generally not sustained beyond a few months [1]. In a trial of 44 patients with MMN treated with IVIG at baseline, worsening functional disability at 12 weeks was more common in patients receiving placebo than those receiving maintenance IVIG (40 versus 17 percent) [35]. Therefore, maintenance IVIG infusions are typically required every two to six weeks. For patients who require maintenance IVIG infusions, subsequent dosing can be tailored to the individual patient based upon clinical response. Some patients will continue to require full-dose IVIG, while others will respond to lower doses. Maintenance IVIG is usually administered over a shorter time period if the initial five-day course is well tolerated. As an example, full-dose maintenance IVIG (total 2 g/kg) might be administered at 1 g/kg daily for two days.

For patients with severe or progressive disease that is refractory to, or becomes resistant to, IVIG therapy, options and evidence are limited [36]. Several reports suggest that cyclophosphamide is partially effective for treating MMN [5,37,38], but its use may be associated with serious toxicity. Responsiveness to rituximab was reported in a few cases [39,40], but rituximab was not associated with improvement on any outcome measures in a series of six patients with MMN [41].

MMN is generally unresponsive to glucocorticoids or plasma exchange [1], and these therapies have been associated with clinical worsening in some cases [1,37,42].

PROGNOSIS — The prognosis of MMN is one of slow progression of disease and disability in untreated patients [1,43]. Spontaneous remission has not been reported [3]. In patients with very slow progression and minimal disability, immunomodulatory treatment may be deferred so as to avoid the risk of side effects. However, treatment should begin early in the disease if activities of living are impaired [3].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Neuropathy".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Definition – Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), also known as multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block, is a rare neuropathy characterized by progressive, asymmetric weakness and atrophy without sensory abnormalities. It is considered an immune-mediated disorder that generally responds to treatment with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG). (See 'Introduction' above and 'Pathogenesis' above.)

Clinical features – The typical clinical presentation of MMN is subacute onset of asymmetric weakness and lower motor neuron signs producing arm and hand weakness without associated sensory loss. The neuronal involvement in MMN is typically patchy, with some nerves unaffected and others severely involved. Motor nerve conduction studies usually show evidence of conduction block. Sensory conduction through the same segment of nerve is normal. Elevated titers of anti-GM1 antibodies are present in 30 to 80 percent of patients. (See 'Clinical features' above.)

Diagnosis – The diagnosis of MMN is suspected by a compatible clinical presentation of progressive, usually asymmetric weakness without sensory abnormalities, upper motor neuron signs, or bulbar involvement. The diagnosis is supported by nerve conduction studies that demonstrate focal demyelination and conduction block. (See 'Diagnosis' above.)

The main consideration in the differential diagnosis of MMN is amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease. (See 'Differential diagnosis' above.)

Treatment – For patients with MMN who require treatment due to disease progression or disability, we suggest IVIG 2 g/kg, given over two to five days (eg, 0.4 g/kg daily for five consecutive days), as initial treatment (Grade 2B). Maintenance IVIG infusions are typically required every two to six weeks. (See 'Treatment' above.)

Prognosis – The prognosis of MMN is one of slow progression of disease and disability in untreated patients. Most patients experience a fairly rapid initial improvement in weakness with IVIG, but the improvement is generally not sustained beyond a few months. Maintenance treatment is typically required to slow disease progression. (See 'Treatment' above and 'Prognosis' above.)

  1. So YT. Immune-mediated neuropathies. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2012; 18:85.
  2. Lange DJ, Trojaborg W. Do GM1 antibodies induce demyelination? Muscle Nerve 1994; 17:105.
  3. Muley SA, Parry GJ. Multifocal motor neuropathy. J Clin Neurosci 2012; 19:1201.
  4. Nowacek DG, Teener JW. Multifocal motor neuropathy. Semin Neurol 2012; 32:500.
  5. Pestronk A, Cornblath DR, Ilyas AA, et al. A treatable multifocal motor neuropathy with antibodies to GM1 ganglioside. Ann Neurol 1988; 24:73.
  6. Kornberg AJ, Pestronk A. The clinical and diagnostic role of anti-GM1 antibody testing. Muscle Nerve 1994; 17:100.
  7. Pestronk A. Invited review: motor neuropathies, motor neuron disorders, and antiglycolipid antibodies. Muscle Nerve 1991; 14:927.
  8. Fionda L, Vanoli F, Di Pasquale A, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy following treatment with adalimumab for ulcerative colitis. J Neurol 2018; 265:1466.
  9. McKenna MC, Marnane M, Sheane BJ, Connolly S. A case of multifocal motor neuropathy after initiation of ixekizumab for psoriatic arthopathy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:e282.
  10. Taylor BV, Dyck PJ, Engelstad J, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy: pathologic alterations at the site of conduction block. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2004; 63:129.
  11. Uncini A, Kuwabara S. Nodopathies of the peripheral nerve: an emerging concept. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015; 86:1186.
  12. Cats EA, van der Pol WL, Piepers S, et al. Correlates of outcome and response to IVIg in 88 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. Neurology 2010; 75:818.
  13. Ishigaki H, Hiraide T, Miyagi Y, et al. Childhood-Onset Multifocal Motor Neuropathy With Immunoglobulin M Antibodies to Gangliosides GM1 and GM2: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Pediatr Neurol 2016; 62:51.
  14. Slee M, Selvan A, Donaghy M. Multifocal motor neuropathy: the diagnostic spectrum and response to treatment. Neurology 2007; 69:1680.
  15. Meuth SG, Kleinschnitz C. Multifocal motor neuropathy: update on clinical characteristics, pathophysiological concepts and therapeutic options. Eur Neurol 2010; 63:193.
  16. Pakiam AS, Parry GJ. Multifocal motor neuropathy without overt conduction block. Muscle Nerve 1998; 21:243.
  17. Katz JS, Barohn RJ, Kojan S, et al. Axonal multifocal motor neuropathy without conduction block or other features of demyelination. Neurology 2002; 58:615.
  18. Delmont E, Azulay JP, Giorgi R, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy with and without conduction block: a single entity? Neurology 2006; 67:592.
  19. Lange DJ, Nijjar R, Voustianiouk A, et al. Do A-waves help predict intravenous immunoglobulin response in multifocal motor neuropathy without block? Muscle Nerve 2011; 43:537.
  20. Riva N, Iannaccone S, Corbo M, et al. Motor nerve biopsy: clinical usefulness and histopathological criteria. Ann Neurol 2011; 69:197.
  21. Andreisek G. Can MR Neurography Differentiate between Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy? Radiology 2019; 292:157.
  22. Kronlage M, Knop KC, Schwarz D, et al. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis versus Multifocal Motor Neuropathy: Utility of MR Neurography. Radiology 2019; 292:149.
  23. Nobile-Orazio E, Cappellari A, Meucci N, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy: clinical and immunological features and response to IVIg in relation to the presence and degree of motor conduction block. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72:761.
  24. Joint Task Force of the EFNS and the PNS. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society--first revision. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2010; 15:295.
  25. Léger JM, Chassande B, Musset L, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in multifocal motor neuropathy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Brain 2001; 124:145.
  26. Van den Berg LH, Kerkhoff H, Oey PL, et al. Treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy with high dose intravenous immunoglobulins: a double blind, placebo controlled study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995; 59:248.
  27. Federico P, Zochodne DW, Hahn AF, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy improved by IVIg: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 2000; 55:1256.
  28. Patwa HS, Chaudhry V, Katzberg H, et al. Evidence-based guideline: intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neuromuscular disorders: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2012; 78:1009.
  29. Nobile-Orazio E, Gallia F. Multifocal motor neuropathy: current therapies and novel strategies. Drugs 2013; 73:397.
  30. Herraets I, van Rosmalen M, Bos J, et al. Clinical outcomes in multifocal motor neuropathy: A combined cross-sectional and follow-up study. Neurology 2020; 95:e1979.
  31. Azulay JP, Blin O, Pouget J, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with motor neuron syndromes associated with anti-GM1 antibodies: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 1994; 44:429.
  32. Keddie S, Eftimov F, van den Berg LH, et al. Immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 1:CD004429.
  33. Racosta JM, Sposato LA, Kimpinski K. Subcutaneous versus intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic autoimmune neuropathies: A meta-analysis. Muscle Nerve 2017; 55:802.
  34. Bakers JNE, van Eijk RPA, van den Berg LH, et al. Pattern of muscle strength improvement after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in multifocal motor neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2021; 63:678.
  35. Hahn AF, Beydoun SR, Lawson V, et al. A controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2013; 18:321.
  36. Umapathi T, Hughes RA, Nobile-Orazio E, Léger JM. Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; :CD003217.
  37. Feldman EL, Bromberg MB, Albers JW, Pestronk A. Immunosuppressive treatment in multifocal motor neuropathy. Ann Neurol 1991; 30:397.
  38. Brannagan TH 3rd, Alaedini A, Gladstone DE. High-dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell rescue for refractory multifocal motor neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34:246.
  39. Rüegg SJ, Fuhr P, Steck AJ. Rituximab stabilizes multifocal motor neuropathy increasingly less responsive to IVIg. Neurology 2004; 63:2178.
  40. Stieglbauer K, Topakian R, Hinterberger G, Aichner FT. Beneficial effect of rituximab monotherapy in multifocal motor neuropathy. Neuromuscul Disord 2009; 19:473.
  41. Chaudhry V, Cornblath DR. An open-label trial of rituximab (Rituxan®) in multifocal motor neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2010; 15:196.
  42. Carpo M, Cappellari A, Mora G, et al. Deterioration of multifocal motor neuropathy after plasma exchange. Neurology 1998; 50:1480.
  43. Lange DJ, Weimer LH, Trojaborg W, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block: slow but not benign. Arch Neurol 2006; 63:1778.
Topic 89904 Version 17.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟