ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Treatment of cerebral aneurysms

Treatment of cerebral aneurysms
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Jul 10, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Cerebral aneurysms are thin-walled protrusions in the intracranial arteries that may rupture to cause a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), often a devastating event with a high mortality and morbidity. Unruptured cerebral aneurysms may also manifest clinically by their mass effect on adjacent neurologic structures, or they may be discovered incidentally when a patient has a neuroimaging study for another indication. Unruptured aneurysms have a future risk of rupture and SAH that varies in part by size and location. Endovascular or surgical repair is the only effective treatment for aneurysmal SAH to prevent rebleeding and further morbidity and is also used for some patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms to prevent SAH.

The treatment of cerebral aneurysms is discussed in this topic. Other aspects of the clinical features, diagnosis, and management of cerebral aneurysms and aneurysmal SAH are discussed separately.

(See "Screening for intracranial aneurysm".)

(See "Unruptured intracranial aneurysms".)

(See "Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis".)

(See "Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis".)

(See "Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Treatment and prognosis".)

PATIENTS WITH SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE

Early rebleeding — Rebleeding occurs in 8 to 23 percent of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Most studies have found that the risk of rebleeding is highest in the first 24 hours after SAH, particularly within six hours of the initial hemorrhage [1-4]. (See "Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Rebleeding'.)

Aneurysmal rebleeding is associated with a poor prognosis. In a prospective study involving 574 hospitalized patients admitted within 14 days of SAH, rebleeding was associated with a 12-fold reduction in the probability of survival with functional independence at three months (odds ratio [OR] 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.34) after correction for admission Hunt and Hess grade and aneurysm size [3]. Another prospective study found similar results [5]. In one case series, half of hemorrhage expansions were related to rerupture of the aneurysm [6]. Other mechanisms of hemorrhage expansion or rebleeding may be similar to those for intracerebral hemorrhage. (See "Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Acute treatment and prognosis", section on 'Managing hemorrhagic expansion'.)

Only aneurysm treatment is effective in preventing rebleeding. In one analysis of neurosurgical aneurysm clipping, the authors estimated the absolute reduction in the risk of a poor outcome was 10 percent (ie, 10 surgeries would prevent a poor outcome in one patient) [7]. Patients in whom aneurysm treatment is not possible or is unavoidably delayed may be candidates for antifibrinolytic therapy.

Timing and choice of therapy — Decisions regarding the timing and choice of therapy for a rupture intracranial aneurysm are ideally made by a team of experienced clinicians.

The timing of surgery following intracranial aneurysm rupture is an area of controversy. The potential benefits of early surgery (within 24 to 72 hours of the hemorrhage) include prevention of rebleeding and management of vasospasm. In addition, the usual methods of treating vasospasm (hypervolemia, induced hypertension, intraarterial vasodilators, and balloon angioplasty) are dangerous in the presence of an untreated aneurysm. (See 'Early rebleeding' above and "Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia'.)

Decisions regarding the choice of therapy in the treatment of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm are made by a team of experienced surgeons and endovascular practitioners. Factors important to consider include the neurologic grade and clinical status of the patient, patient age, the availability of expertise in surgical and endovascular techniques, as well as the anatomic characteristics of the aneurysm, including the location and the size of the aneurysm and its neck [8,9]. (See 'Anatomic considerations' below.)

Good-grade SAH — Early aneurysm repair (within 24 to 72 hours) in patients with good-grade aneurysmal SAH (Hunt and Hess grades I to III) (table 1) is a generally accepted treatment with a satisfactory outcome in the large majority of patients. Approximately 70 to 90 percent of patients have a good neurologic recovery, with a mortality rate of 1.7 percent to 8 percent [10]. Limited clinical trial evidence suggests that early aneurysm surgery may be associated with a lower risk of rebleeding and better outcome than later surgery, but the results did not achieve statistical significance [11,12]. Observational studies, which are limited by selection bias, suggest that early intervention is associated with better outcomes [13].

A subset of patients with good-grade aneurysmal SAH may do as well, or even better, with endovascular coiling [14,15]. In the largest of the randomized trials to examine this question, the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT), 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms were randomly assigned to neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling [16,17]. The patients in this study represented a selected subgroup in which 88 percent were of good clinical status, and aneurysms ≤3 mm were excluded; 90 percent of the target aneurysms were smaller than 10 mm in diameter, and 95 percent of aneurysms were in the anterior circulation [17]. Outcomes included:

Lower rates of combined death and disability at one year in the endovascular group (23.5 versus 30.9 percent), with an absolute risk reduction of 7.4 percent (95% CI 3.6-11.2) [17]. At 10 years, the endovascular group continued to have somewhat lower rates of both mortality and combined death and dependency (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.73, and OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.67, respectively) [18].

Similar mortality at one year, 8.0 percent (95% CI 6.4-9.8) and 9.9 percent (95% CI 8.2-11.9), in the endovascular and neurosurgical groups, respectively [17].

Higher rates of post-treatment rebleeding from the target aneurysm in the endovascular therapy group during the first year (2.6 versus 1.0 percent). Few rebleeding events occurred in either treatment group after one year but again were more common in the endovascular therapy group [19]. However, within eight years rebleeding rates become similar [20]. (See "Late recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracranial aneurysms".)

Lower rates of post-treatment seizures in the endovascular group (relative risk 0.52, 95% CI 0.37-0.74) [17]. At one year, the prevalence of epilepsy and cognitive impairment were less common in patients treated by endovascular coiling than surgical clipping [21].

These results can only be applied to patients who fit the characteristics of patients selected to participate in the ISAT, which is a small percentage of patients presenting with SAH [16]. For such patients, endovascular coiling appears to have somewhat more favorable outcomes and is probably the favored treatment for aneurysm repair if anatomic and morphologic features of the aneurysm are deemed appropriate for endovascular treatment.

Poor-grade SAH — The prognosis for patients with aneurysmal SAH and with poor clinical grade (Hunt and Hess IV and V) (table 1) is poor, particularly in those patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale motor score (table 2) less than 4 [22]. Treatment decisions need to be individualized with consultation with family members. Some data suggest that aneurysm occlusion in such patients (particularly if associated with advanced age and medical comorbidity) may not improve their overall prognosis [23]. Nonetheless, we favor early treatment, with endovascular therapy when possible for patients with poor-grade SAH.

Early surgery may be more complicated than a procedure delayed for 10 to 14 days in patients with poor clinical grade. The presence of cerebral edema (which may prevent brain retraction and relaxation) and clot around the aneurysm increases the technical difficulty of surgery. Early surgery may be associated with an increased risk of ischemic complications [24]. However, early rebleeding is also more common in patients with poor clinical grade [25]. One large retrospective study of 2106 patients found that delayed surgery was associated with a small, nonsignificant reduction in delayed cerebral ischemia, but a significant increase in poor outcomes [26].

Endovascular techniques also may offer a less invasive and often definitive mode of therapy for this group [27]; the concerns regarding the increased difficulty of early surgery do not apply to intraluminal therapy. In addition, although not substantiated by any large series, the use of intravascular embolization of aneurysms in the acute setting may facilitate aggressive medical management algorithms for proactive treatment of cerebral vasospasm.

A systematic review and meta-analysis that included the ISAT as well as other smaller randomized trials and observational studies found that while outcomes at one-year were more favorable in patient treated with endovascular coiling, the choice of treatment modality did not seem to have a significant impact on outcome in patients with poor preoperative grade [28]. In a subsequently performed randomized trial of 571 patients with SAH that included patients with a broader spectrum of disease severity than were included in ISAT, patients assigned to endovascular treatment were more likely to have a better outcome at one year as measured by the modified Rankin Scale; the difference no longer reached statistical significant at year 3 [29,30]. It is noteworthy that 38 percent of those assigned to endovascular treatment crossed over to surgical clipping (usually because the endovascular treatment was judged to be technically difficult); such patients had a worse outcome than those who received the assigned endovascular treatment and was similar to those who were assigned to and received clipping.

Post-treatment management — Patients are managed in the intensive care unit after aneurysm therapy. Continuous cardiodynamic and neurologic monitoring is critical. Postoperative angiography is used at the surgeons' discretion. Patients should have monitoring and treatment for vasospasm. (See "Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia'.)

PATIENTS WITH UNRUPTURED ANEURYSMS — The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is controversial [31]. There are no randomized trials on which to base recommendations. Decisions about therapy need to weigh the natural history of the aneurysm, the risks of intervention, and patient preferences. While these are discussed in detail separately, in general, asymptomatic aneurysms ≥7 to 10 mm in diameter warrant strong consideration for treatment, taking into account patient age, existing medical and neurologic conditions, and relative risks for treatment [32]. (See "Unruptured intracranial aneurysms", section on 'Risk factors for aneurysm rupture' and "Unruptured intracranial aneurysms", section on 'Risk of intervention'.)

Surgical treatment of unruptured aneurysms has been the most common procedure used in patients who undergo definitive therapy. In clinical studies, which are typically in centers with high case volumes, endovascular techniques appear to be associated with lower morbidity and mortality than surgical clipping and are playing an increasing role in the treatment of unruptured aneurysms [33-40]. New technologies, such as flow diversion, may advance the safety of endovascular treatment and allow aneurysms, previously considered to be inaccessible or technologically difficult for such treatment [41]. (See 'Newer techniques' below.)

TECHNIQUES — Surgical and endovascular techniques are available for aneurysm treatment. In many cases, anatomic considerations, such as size and location, along with other morphological features, determine which treatment is most appropriate for the patient.

Surgery — Surgical management of cerebral aneurysms, in which a clip is placed across the neck of the aneurysm, is an effective and safe procedure with the evolution of microsurgical techniques in the hands of an experienced surgeon (image 1). This applies to patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms and those with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) [7].

Treatment at specialized neurosurgical centers performing high volumes of cerebral aneurysm procedures is associated with better outcome compared with treatment at lower-volume centers [42]. Temporary clip occlusion may be achieved via traditional extraluminal clip placement or with an intravascular balloon but does not clearly prevent complications [43]. Intraoperative angiography is useful to facilitate accurate clip placement and to confirm parent vessel patency after clip occlusion and occlusion of the aneurysm; this allows immediate clip revision when necessary, which is estimated to occur in approximately 10 percent of patients [44-47]. Intraoperative hypothermia does not appear to improve neurologic outcome after surgery for intracranial aneurysm clipping [48-50]. Prolonged hypotension should be avoided during surgery [9].

Risks associated with surgical aneurysm treatment include new or worsened neurologic deficits caused by brain retraction, temporary arterial occlusion, and intraoperative hemorrhage [51-53]. Intraprocedural aneurysmal rupture occurred in 19 percent of 711 patients treated with surgical clipping in the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study and was associated with periprocedural death and disability [54]. Procedure-related surgical complications occurred in 29 (20 percent) of 143 patients in a retrospective series [55], although functional outcome was good in 22 (76 percent) of those patients.

Endovascular therapy

Coil embolism — The Guglielmi electrolytically detachable coil system was introduced in the early 1990s [56]. Platinum coils are inserted into the lumen of the aneurysm (image 2). A local thrombus then forms around the coils, obliterating the aneurysmal sac [57]. The procedure is often, but not invariably, performed under general anesthesia [9].

Complications of endovascular coiling include thromboembolism and intraprocedural aneurysm rupture. Both of these complications are somewhat more common in the setting of SAH than for unruptured aneurysms [58,59].

Thromboembolism occurred in 12.5 percent of endovascularly treated aneurysms in one series [60]. Aneurysm size >10 mm and neck size >4 mm were risk factors for this complication.

While of unproven benefit, some combination of heparin and/or antiplatelet therapy is used in most centers to minimize sequelae [61]. In one large series, 9.3 percent of patients experienced a thromboembolic event during coiling despite use of heparin and aspirin [62]. In one series, GIIB/IIIa inhibitors appeared to be safer for this indication than thrombolytic agents [63].

Intraprocedural aneurysmal rupture occurred in 5 percent of 299 patients with aneurysmal SAH treated with coil embolization in the CARAT study [54]. Periprocedural death or disability was more likely in those with this complication compared with those without rupture (34 versus 17 percent). Other studies have shown similar rates of intraprocedural rupture during endovascular coiling of 4 to 5 percent [59,60,64]. Among different series, risk factors for this complication have been variably noted to include small aneurysm size, middle cerebral artery location, ruptured versus unruptured status, and hypertension [60,65,66]. Patients treated with anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy may require reversal of these therapies if intraprocedural rupture occurs [9].

Coiled aneurysms also appear to be more likely than clipped aneurysms to recur and require additional intervention. (See "Late recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracranial aneurysms", section on 'Recurrence of the treated aneurysm'.)

Newer techniques — Endovascular therapy for cerebral aneurysms is evolving. New techniques under investigation including stent-assisted coiling, balloon-assisted coiling, flow diverters and disruptors, and new embolic material including liquids offer promise that aneurysms previously considered not amenable to therapy will be treatable in the future [58,67].

Anatomic considerations — Aneurysms in distal arterial segments are often not amenable to endovascular therapy [68]; surgical therapy may be preferred in these circumstances. Endovascular treatment is often the preferred technique for proximal intracranial carotid and posterior circulation aneurysms, which are accessible by angiogram but harder to get to surgically [69]. In contrast, aneurysms at the middle cerebral artery trifurcation are difficult to coil without complication, and surgery may be preferred for these lesions.

Combined endovascular and surgical techniques may be required with some very large or complex aneurysms [70]. Some aneurysms remain challenging to treat by any technique; these include giant aneurysms, fusiform aneurysms, and those with very broad necks and a low fundus-to-neck ratio [58].

ANEURYSM RECURRENCE AND LATE REBLEEDING — Patients who survive aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and those with unruptured intracranial aneurysms have a small but enduring risk of subsequent SAH, which can occur despite successful endovascular or surgical treatment of the aneurysm.

SAH may result from recurrence of the treated aneurysm, rupture of another pre-existing aneurysm in a patient with multiple aneurysms, and de novo aneurysm formation. The risk of these events and recommendations for monitoring and treatment are discussed separately. (See "Late recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracranial aneurysms".)

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Stroke in adults".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage – Patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms present with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Decisions regarding the timing and choice of therapy for ruptured intracranial aneurysms are ideally made by a team of experienced clinicians who consider the neurologic grade and clinical status of the patient, the availability of expertise in surgical and endovascular techniques, as well as the anatomic characteristics of the aneurysm. (See 'Timing and choice of therapy' above.)

For patients with good-grade aneurysmal SAH (Hunt and Hess grades I to III) (table 1), we suggest early aneurysm repair (within 24 to 72 hours) (Grade 2C). In centers with available expertise and in patients with endovascularly accessible lesions, short-term outcomes appear to be improved with endovascular coiling compared with surgical clipping. (See 'Good-grade SAH' above.)

The optimal timing and choice of therapy in patients with more severe aneurysmal SAH (Hunt and Hess grades IV and V) is uncertain. Their overall prognosis is poor, particularly for older patients. Treatment decisions need to be individualized in consultation with family members. (See 'Poor-grade SAH' above.)

Patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms – Asymptomatic aneurysms ≥7 to 10 mm in diameter warrant strong consideration for treatment, taking into account patient age, existing medical and neurologic conditions, and relative risks for treatment. (See "Unruptured intracranial aneurysms".)

Treatment techniques – Surgical clipping and endovascular coiling are the most commonly used techniques for aneurysm treatment. In many cases, anatomic considerations, such as size, location, and other morphological features determine which treatment is most appropriate for the patient. (See 'Techniques' above.)

Surgical management of cerebral aneurysms involves placing a clip across the neck of the aneurysm to secure the lesion (image 1). Distal aneurysms and aneurysms at the middle cerebral artery trifurcation can be difficult to treat with endovascular techniques and are frequently treated with surgery. (See 'Surgery' above.)

Endovascular techniques include placing coils into the lumen of the aneurysm (image 2). A local thrombus then forms around the coils, obliterating the aneurysmal sac. Other options include stent-assisted coiling, balloon-assisted coiling, and flow diverters and disruptors. Endovascular treatment is often the preferred technique for proximal intracranial carotid and posterior circulation aneurysms, which are accessible by angiogram but can be difficult to access surgically. (See 'Endovascular therapy' above.)

Combined endovascular and surgical techniques may be required with some very large or complex aneurysms. (See 'Newer techniques' above.)

Management of late recurrence – Patients with aneurysmal SAH are at enduring risk of recurrent SAH despite aneurysm treatment and may require follow-up evaluations. (See "Late recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracranial aneurysms".)

  1. Winn HR, Richardson AE, Jane JA. The long-term prognosis in untreated cerebral aneurysms: I. The incidence of late hemorrhage in cerebral aneurysm: a 10-year evaluation of 364 patients. Ann Neurol 1977; 1:358.
  2. Inagawa T, Kamiya K, Ogasawara H, Yano T. Rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the acute stage. Surg Neurol 1987; 28:93.
  3. Naidech AM, Janjua N, Kreiter KT, et al. Predictors and impact of aneurysm rebleeding after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Arch Neurol 2005; 62:410.
  4. Larsen CC, Astrup J. Rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a literature review. World Neurosurg 2013; 79:307.
  5. Lord AS, Fernandez L, Schmidt JM, et al. Effect of rebleeding on the course and incidence of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2012; 78:31.
  6. van Asch CJ, Oudendijk JF, Rinkel GJ, Klijn CJ. Early intracerebral hematoma expansion after aneurysmal rupture. Stroke 2010; 41:2592.
  7. Brilstra EH, Algra A, Rinkel GJ, et al. Effectiveness of neurosurgical clip application in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2002; 97:1036.
  8. Sherif C, Gruber A, Dorfer C, et al. Ruptured carotid artery aneurysms of the ophthalmic (C6) segment: clinical and angiographic long term follow-up of a multidisciplinary management strategy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80:1261.
  9. Hoh BL, Ko NU, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. 2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2023; 54:e314.
  10. Le Roux PD, Elliott JP, Downey L, et al. Improved outcome after rupture of anterior circulation aneurysms: a retrospective 10-year review of 224 good-grade patients. J Neurosurg 1995; 83:394.
  11. Whitfield PC, Kirkpatrick PJ. Timing of surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; :CD001697.
  12. Ohman J, Heiskanen O. Timing of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg 1989; 70:55.
  13. Phillips TJ, Dowling RJ, Yan B, et al. Does treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms within 24 hours improve clinical outcome? Stroke 2011; 42:1936.
  14. Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, et al. Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000; 31:2369.
  15. Lindgren A, Vergouwen MD, van der Schaaf I, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 8:CD003085.
  16. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360:1267.
  17. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366:809.
  18. Molyneux AJ, Birks J, Clarke A, et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015; 385:691.
  19. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Birks J, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8:427.
  20. Schaafsma JD, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. Long-term recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after adequate coiling versus clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2009; 40:1758.
  21. Scott RB, Eccles F, Molyneux AJ, et al. Improved cognitive outcomes with endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: neuropsychological outcomes from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2010; 41:1743.
  22. van den Berg R, Foumani M, Schröder RD, et al. Predictors of outcome in World Federation of Neurologic Surgeons grade V aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:2722.
  23. Koffijberg H, Buskens E, Rinkel GJ. Aneurysm occlusion in elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a cost-utility analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011; 82:718.
  24. Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Rebleeding, secondary ischemia, and timing of operation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2000; 55:1656.
  25. Laidlaw JD, Siu KH. Ultra-early surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcomes for a consecutive series of 391 patients not selected by grade or age. J Neurosurg 2002; 97:250.
  26. Dorhout Mees SM, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, et al. Timing of aneurysm treatment after subarachnoid hemorrhage: relationship with delayed cerebral ischemia and poor outcome. Stroke 2012; 43:2126.
  27. Gonzalez NR, Dusick JR, Duckwiler G, et al. Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: report of 205 treated aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2010; 66:714.
  28. Li H, Pan R, Wang H, et al. Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013; 44:29.
  29. McDougall CG, Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM, et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012; 116:135.
  30. Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC, et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 3-year results. J Neurosurg 2013; 119:146.
  31. Johnston SC, Wilson CB, Halbach VV, et al. Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: comparison of risks. Ann Neurol 2000; 48:11.
  32. Greving JP, Rinkel GJ, Buskens E, Algra A. Cost-effectiveness of preventive treatment of intracranial aneurysms: new data and uncertainties. Neurology 2009; 73:258.
  33. Pouratian N, Oskouian RJ Jr, Jensen ME, et al. Endovascular management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77:572.
  34. Qureshi AI, Janardhan V, Hanel RA, Lanzino G. Comparison of endovascular and surgical treatments for intracranial aneurysms: an evidence-based review. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6:816.
  35. Johnston SC, Zhao S, Dudley RA, et al. Treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in California. Stroke 2001; 32:597.
  36. Vallee JN, Aymard A, Vicaut E, et al. Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: predictors of immediate and long-term results with multivariate analysis 6-year experience. Radiology 2003; 226:867.
  37. Raftopoulos C, Goffette P, Vaz G, et al. Surgical clipping may lead to better results than coil embolization: results from a series of 101 consecutive unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2003; 52:1280.
  38. Zacharia BE, Ducruet AF, Hickman ZL, et al. Technological advances in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms fail to improve outcome in New York state. Stroke 2011; 42:2844.
  39. McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Fan J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of unruptured cerebral aneurysm therapies: propensity score analysis of clipping versus coiling. Stroke 2013; 44:988.
  40. Hwang JS, Hyun MK, Lee HJ, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review. BMC Neurol 2012; 12:99.
  41. De Vries J, Boogaarts J, Van Norden A, Wakhloo AK. New generation of Flow Diverter (surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013; 44:1567.
  42. Berman MF, Solomon RA, Mayer SA, et al. Impact of hospital-related factors on outcome after treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2003; 34:2200.
  43. Jabre A, Symon L. Temporary vascular occlusion during aneurysm surgery. Surg Neurol 1987; 27:47.
  44. Tang G, Cawley CM, Dion JE, Barrow DL. Intraoperative angiography during aneurysm surgery: a prospective evaluation of efficacy. J Neurosurg 2002; 96:993.
  45. Chiang VL, Gailloud P, Murphy KJ, et al. Routine intraoperative angiography during aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 2002; 96:988.
  46. Klopfenstein JD, Spetzler RF, Kim LJ, et al. Comparison of routine and selective use of intraoperative angiography during aneurysm surgery: a prospective assessment. J Neurosurg 2004; 100:230.
  47. Kumar R, Friedman JA. Intraoperative angiography during cerebral aneurysm surgery. Neurocrit Care 2009; 11:299.
  48. Todd MM, Hindman BJ, Clarke WR, et al. Mild intraoperative hypothermia during surgery for intracranial aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:135.
  49. Zhao ZX, Wu C, He M. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, perioperative data and selective adverse events related to mild hypothermia in intracranial aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114:827.
  50. Li LR, You C, Chaudhary B. Intraoperative mild hypothermia for postoperative neurological deficits in intracranial aneurysm patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; :CD008445.
  51. Andrews RJ, Bringas JR. A review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury. Neurosurgery 1993; 33:1052.
  52. Samson D, Batjer HH, Bowman G, et al. A clinical study of the parameters and effects of temporary arterial occlusion in the management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1994; 34:22.
  53. Fridriksson S, Säveland H, Jakobsson KE, et al. Intraoperative complications in aneurysm surgery: a prospective national study. J Neurosurg 2002; 96:515.
  54. Elijovich L, Higashida RT, Lawton MT, et al. Predictors and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study. Stroke 2008; 39:1501.
  55. McLaughlin N, Bojanowski MW. Early surgery-related complications after aneurysm clip placement: an analysis of causes and patient outcomes. J Neurosurg 2004; 101:600.
  56. Dovey Z, Misra M, Thornton J, et al. Guglielmi detachable coiling for intracranial aneurysms: the story so far. Arch Neurol 2001; 58:559.
  57. Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg 1991; 75:1.
  58. Pierot L, Wakhloo AK. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status. Stroke 2013; 44:2046.
  59. Sturiale CL, Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2013; 44:1897.
  60. Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, et al. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting the rate and outcome of endovascular treatment complications in a series of 782 patients (CLARITY study). Radiology 2010; 256:916.
  61. van den Bergh WM, Kerr RS, Algra A, et al. Effect of antiplatelet therapy for endovascular coiling in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2009; 40:1969.
  62. Ries T, Siemonsen S, Grzyska U, et al. Abciximab is a safe rescue therapy in thromboembolic events complicating cerebral aneurysm coil embolization: single center experience in 42 cases and review of the literature. Stroke 2009; 40:1750.
  63. Brinjikji W, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Rescue treatment of thromboembolic complications during endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2013; 44:1343.
  64. Renowden SA, Benes V, Bradley M, Molyneux AJ. Detachable coil embolisation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single center study, a decade experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009; 111:179.
  65. Nguyen TN, Raymond J, Guilbert F, et al. Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. J Neurosurg 2008; 108:1088.
  66. Chalouhi N, Penn DL, Tjoumakaris S, et al. Treatment of small ruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of surgical and endovascular options. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1:e002865.
  67. Chua MMJ, Silveira L, Moore J, et al. Flow diversion for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Mechanism and implications. Ann Neurol 2019; 85:793.
  68. Fernandez Zubillaga A, Guglielmi G, Viñuela F, Duckwiler GR. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:815.
  69. Tateshima S, Murayama Y, Gobin YP, et al. Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils: anatomic and clinical outcomes in 73 patients from a single institution. Neurosurgery 2000; 47:1332.
  70. Suzuki S, Tateshima S, Jahan R, et al. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with detachable coils: angiographic and clinical outcomes in 115 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2009; 64:876.
Topic 90190 Version 14.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟