ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia

Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia
Literature review current through: Jan 2024.
This topic last updated: Dec 13, 2023.

INTRODUCTION — Acute mesenteric ischemia refers to the sudden onset of intestinal hypoperfusion, which can be due to a nonocclusive reduction of arterial blood flow. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is most commonly due to primary mesenteric arterial vasoconstriction. NOMI was first described in patients with heart failure [1]. The majority of cases involve spasm of branches of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) supplying the small intestine and proximal colon. Early diagnosis is based upon a high index of clinical suspicion in patients with risk factors but often requires arteriography to firmly establish the diagnosis. NOMI is less common than in the past, and when it occurs, it is managed by reversal of inciting factors, including cessation of vasoconstrictive medicines, correction of the underlying cause of hypoperfusion (if possible), and anticoagulation to limit arterial thrombosis. Selective infusion of the SMA with papaverine or other vasodilator is an option but is uncommonly performed today.

NOMI will be reviewed here. Acute and chronic mesenteric arterial occlusion affecting the small intestine, and colonic ischemia, are discussed separately. (See "Overview of intestinal ischemia in adults" and "Mesenteric venous thrombosis in adults" and "Chronic mesenteric ischemia" and "Colonic ischemia".)

BLOOD SUPPLY TO THE SMALL INTESTINE — The circulation to the small intestines is derived primarily from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (figure 1 and figure 2). The venous drainage parallels the arterial circulation and drains into the portal venous system (figure 3 and figure 4). An extensive collateral circulation (figure 5) protects the intestines from transient periods of inadequate perfusion [2,3].

NONOCCLUSIVE ISCHEMIC INJURY — Ischemic injury to the intestine develops when delivery of oxygen and nutrients is insufficient for cellular metabolism. The likelihood of developing intestinal ischemia depends upon the adequacy of systemic perfusion and collateral circulation, the number and caliber of mesenteric vessels that are affected, and the duration of the ischemic insult. The intestine is able to compensate for approximately a 75 percent acute reduction in mesenteric blood flow for up to 12 hours without substantial injury, in part because of increased oxygen extraction [4].

The pathogenesis of NOMI is related to a homeostatic mechanism that maintains cardiac and cerebral blood flow at the expense of the mesenteric and peripheral circulation [5-8]. Vasopressin and angiotensin are likely the neurohormonal mediators of this phenomenon. Spasm may also be triggered by other vasoactive and cardiotonic drugs [6,9]. The typical physiology of the intestine and response to ischemia are discussed in more detail elsewhere. (See "Overview of intestinal ischemia in adults", section on 'Physiology and mechanisms of ischemia'.)

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND RISK FACTORS — NOMI accounts for 5 to 15 percent of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia [10-12]. In mixed patient populations with intestinal gangrene, the proportion of patients with NOMI is reported to be between 4 and 60 percent [13-15]. In a study in which 35,784 deaths occurred during the years 1970 to 1982, the estimated overall incidence of NOMI with intestinal infarction (verified at autopsy or operation) was 2.0/100,000 person-years [13]. The disease was defined as an intestinal gangrene despite open arteries and with no signs of embolism, dissection, or strangulation. Among the etiologies of acute mesenteric ischemia, NOMI is a diagnosis of exclusion. (See 'Diagnosis' below.)

The incidence of NOMI has declined approximately 50 percent since the 1970s, which has been attributed to the widespread use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care units, coupled with prompt correction of hypotension, and the use of systemic vasodilators in cardiac failure [10]. Despite the decline in its incidence, when it occurs, NOMI results in high mortality because of the difficulty in making the diagnosis, and reversing established NOMI [16]. (See 'Treatment' below and 'Morbidity and mortality' below.)

Risk factors — A careful review of the patient's personal medical history is important. The patient with NOMI is critically ill, typically with severe cardiovascular disease; has a life-threatening complication (sepsis, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, COVID-19); and often is receiving multiple drugs known to reduce intestinal perfusion for inotropic support.

Risk factors for NOMI include [13,17-35]:

Heart failure/cardiogenic shock

Peripheral and mesenteric artery disease

Aortic insufficiency

Septic shock

Cardiac arrhythmias

Administration of vasoconstrictive medications (eg, digoxin, alpha-adrenergic agonists)

Substance use disorder (eg, cocaine, methamphetamines)

Recent cardiopulmonary bypass

Chronic renal insufficiency/dialysis

Severe burns (associated hypovolemia/shock)

Severe acute pancreatitis

CLINICAL FEATURES

History and physical — The severity and location of the abdominal pain that accompanies NOMI is usually more variable than the classic presentation of acute mesenteric ischemia related to mesenteric arterial obstruction (ie, rapid onset abdominal pain out of proportion to findings on physical examination).

NOMI usually starts with nonspecific symptoms, consisting of mild abdominal pain that gradually progresses and may be accompanied by a bloating sensation, nausea, and vomiting. Abdominal pain is absent in up to 25 percent of patients with NOMI. The clinical presentation of NOMI may be overshadowed by precipitating disorders, including hypotension, congestive heart failure, hypovolemia, and cardiac arrhythmias. Mental status changes are reported to occur in approximately one-third of older adult patients with acute mesenteric ischemia [36]. In addition, many of these patients are intubated and sedated, which may mask the usual clinical symptoms. Because of these factors, in many cases, complications (necrosis, perforation) develop before a definitive diagnosis can be established. Thus, a high index of suspicion in older adult patients with risk factors for NOMI is imperative for making a prompt diagnosis.

Abdominal examination may be normal initially or reveal only mild abdominal distension or occult blood in the stool. Signs of peritoneal inflammation, such as rebound tenderness and guarding, are absent with ischemia alone. However, if ischemia progresses and transmural bowel infarction develops, peritoneal signs will develop and the abdomen will become distended as ileus develops.

Laboratory studies — Laboratory studies are nonspecific. Although abnormal laboratory values, such as an elevated white cell count, elevated serum lactate, elevated hematocrit (consistent with hemoconcentration), and metabolic acidosis, may be helpful in bolstering suspicion for acute mesenteric ischemia, these do not help determine the etiology, and normal laboratory values do not exclude the diagnosis. However, any patient with acute abdominal pain, minimal findings on abdominal examination, and metabolic acidosis should be regarded as having intestinal ischemia until proven otherwise.

The role of routine laboratory studies and experimental studies in the general diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia is reviewed in detail elsewhere. (See "Overview of intestinal ischemia in adults", section on 'Laboratory studies'.)

Plain abdominal films — Plain abdominal radiographs and ultrasound have a limited role in diagnosing mesenteric ischemia and may be completely normal in more than 25 percent of patients [2]. Plain abdominal radiographs may be helpful in excluding other pathology. Findings suggestive of NOMI include the presence of an ileus, bowel wall thickening, presence of portovenous gas, and/or pneumatosis intestinalis, which is a sign of advanced ischemia (image 1).

Although plain films do not exclude mesenteric ischemia, they may identify complications related to mesenteric ischemia (eg, necrosis, perforation) that indicate the need for immediate abdominal exploration and may identify another obvious cause of abdominal pain (eg, volvulus, small bowel obstruction).

Cross-sectional abdominal imaging — Cross-sectional abdominal imaging studies (eg, computed tomography [CT] of the abdomen, magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) are typically performed first in patients with abdominal pain, but the findings are generally nonspecific. Abdominal CT is generally preferred over MR in the setting of acute abdominal pain because of its lower costs and wide availability [37,38]. Abdominal CT should be performed without oral contrast, which can obscure the mesenteric vessels, obscure bowel wall enhancement, and can lead to a delay of the diagnosis. As with plain films, abdominal CT can rule out other causes of acute abdominal pain and may demonstrate gastrointestinal signs consistent with acute mesenteric ischemia such as focal or segmental bowel wall thickening, bowel dilation, mesenteric stranding, or intestinal pneumatosis with portal vein gas (image 2) [39,40].

DIAGNOSIS — The diagnosis of NOMI depends upon a high degree of clinical suspicion (algorithm 1), especially in patients with known risk factors, since clinical signs and symptoms are nonspecific and can be obscured in these typically critically ill patients. Rapid diagnosis is essential to minimize complications (eg, bowel necrosis, perforation) associated with intestinal ischemia [10,41-44].

A definitive imaging diagnosis of NOMI relies upon the demonstration of narrowing or spasm of mesenteric arcades, which can be seen as reduced intramural vessel filling (image 3 and image 4), a reduced number of mesenteric vessels (arteries and veins) (image 5), and irregularity of the arterial branches of the mesenteric vasculature on vascular imaging (alternating dilation and narrowing "chain of lakes" or "string of sausages" sign). These changes are most reliably demonstrated on selective mesenteric arteriography [45-48]. However, when arteriography is performed, spasm may be relieved, and the diagnosis may be missed [16,49]. The greatest advantage of selective mesenteric arteriography, in addition to identifying the specific site of vascular compromise, is the ability to treat mesenteric vasoconstriction with infusion of papaverine. (See 'Vasodilator infusion' below.)

Whether to proceed directly to digital subtraction arteriography, which is invasive, or to first obtain computed tomography (CT) angiography (or magnetic resonance [MR] angiography) requires clinical judgement [50]. CT or MR angiography is most useful for screening patients and identifying features consistent with an alternative vascular etiology for mesenteric ischemia (eg, arterial occlusion, venous thrombosis) [30,37,38,50-56]. In most emergency settings, CT angiography is recommended as soon as possible in patients suspected of having acute mesenteric insufficiency [57]. Like digital subtraction arteriography, a diagnosis of NOMI can still be missed on CT or MR angiography because of the dynamic and spastic pattern and functional nature of the disease [6,9]. More data comparing these modalities to digital subtraction arteriography are needed, particularly to understand whether they can accurately detect the vascular changes of NOMI prior to the onset of irreversible gastrointestinal ischemic changes [56,58].

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS — NOMI needs to be differentiated from other causes of mesenteric ischemia due to acute embolic or thrombotic arterial occlusion, or mesenteric venous thrombosis. (See "Overview of intestinal ischemia in adults".)

Confusion may also arise in acute abdominal pain resulting from volvulus, intussusception, and acute small bowel obstruction from adhesions where the mechanical obstruction may also compress mesenteric vessels and lead to mesenteric ischemia and necrosis.

TREATMENT — The goal of treatment of patients with NOMI is to restore intestinal blood flow as rapidly as possible (algorithm 2), which is accomplished by removing inciting factors (vasoconstrictive medications), treating underlying causes (heart failure, sepsis), hemodynamic support and monitoring, and, less commonly, intra-arterial infusion of vasodilators.

Patients with acute peritoneal signs will require abdominal exploration and bowel resection.

Hemodynamic support and monitoring — Patients suspected of having NOMI should be resuscitated, including measures aimed at improving cardiac function, correction of hypovolemia and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, correction of metabolic acidosis, initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and placement of a nasogastric tube for gastric decompression. Although not subjected to rigorous study, antibiotics are generally recommended due to the high risk for bacterial translocation and sepsis as ischemia and/or infarction progresses [59].

Vasoconstricting agents and digitalis should be avoided if possible since they can exacerbate mesenteric ischemia. If an inotropic agent is required, either dobutamine, low-dose dopamine, or milrinone is preferred since the effect on mesenteric perfusion is less compared with other vasopressor agents. Determination of cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and mixed venous oxygen saturation is important to selecting appropriate treatment. (See "Use of vasopressors and inotropes".)

Anticoagulation — The efficacy of systemic anticoagulation as a means for improving mucosal perfusion in the face of arterial spasm has not been studied. Some clinicians anticoagulate these patients until vasoconstriction resolves and the perfusion deficit can be corrected as a means to limit the development of thrombus. However, this practice is not supported by evidence from any clinical trials.

Vasodilator infusion — Other than supportive care, the only intervention available for patients with NOMI involves infusion of vasodilators (eg, papaverine, prostaglandins, nitroglycerin) to reverse mesenteric vasoconstriction. However, there are no robust data that prove the benefit of vasodilator therapy in these patients [60]. Transcatheter infusion of vasodilators may be most useful in the setting of illicit drug overdose or accidental therapeutic drug overdoses [30,61]. The available literature consists of case reports and small series, with heterogeneous data that make interpreting outcomes difficult. If the underlying condition associated with NOMI cannot be reversed, it is not clear that vasodilator therapy in and of itself is sufficient to prevent physiologic vasoconstriction. A small retrospective series of 21 consecutive patients with NOMI suggested that earlier initiation of vasodilator therapy was associated with a higher likelihood of survival [62].

Vasodilators are administered through an arteriographic catheter, typically placed into the superior mesenteric artery. Papaverine is the predominantly used agent, but its availability is limited [63]. Papaverine should not be mixed with heparin-containing fluids due to risk of precipitation.

Heparin is, however, generally administered through the arterial sheath to prevent thrombosis of the cannulated vessel (eg, femoral artery, brachial artery) [2,10,16,64].

In patients without peritoneal signs, repeat arteriography can be performed in 24 hours to verify resolution of vasoconstriction.

Abdominal exploration — Surgery should not be delayed in patients suspected of having intestinal infarction or perforation based upon clinical or radiographic features. In patients who require segmental bowel resection, a delay in completing the intestinal anastomosis and aggressive re-exploration may improve survival (mortality of 22 versus 42 percent in one series) [65,66].

Following exploration, the abdomen can be closed provided there is no undue tension on the abdominal wall. Alternatively, the abdomen can be left open for interval closure. When a second-look operation is anticipated, leaving the abdomen open facilitates re-exploration and prevents complications that can develop related to elevated intra-abdominal pressure. Assessment of adequate intestinal perfusion and viable bowel may be aided by intraoperative use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence [67].

Methods for dressing the open abdomen and timing of closure are discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Management of the open abdomen in adults".)

MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY — Nonocclusive intestinal ischemia has the poorest survival rate among the various etiologies of mesenteric ischemia, primarily because of the severity of comorbid conditions that precipitate reduced mesenteric perfusion, and delays in diagnosis. NOMI has a mortality rate of 70 to 90 percent that has changed little over time [30].

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Intestinal ischemia".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Risk factors – Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) accounts for up to 20 percent of cases of acute mesenteric ischemia. Risk factors for NOMI include known cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, aortic insufficiency, sepsis, cardiac arrhythmias, administration of digoxin or alpha-adrenergic agonists, cocaine, cardiopulmonary bypass, and dialysis. (See 'Risk factors' above.)

Clinical features – The typical patient with NOMI is an older adult with cardiovascular disease who has a life-threatening complication (such as a myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure) and is being treated with drugs known to reduce intestinal perfusion (such as diuretics). Abdominal pain that accompanies NOMI is variable compared with the classic severe pain of acute mesenteric ischemia due to arterial embolism or thrombosis. Abdominal pain is absent in up to 25 percent of patients, and the clinical picture may be overshadowed by precipitating disorders. (See 'Clinical features' above.)

Diagnosis – Rapid diagnosis is essential to prevent complications (eg, bowel necrosis, perforation) associated with acute mesenteric ischemia. The diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia depends upon a high degree of clinical suspicion in the patient with risk factors. However, early signs and symptoms of mesenteric ischemia are nonspecific. (See 'Diagnosis' above.)

Abdominal computed tomographic (CT) angiography, without oral contrast, is useful as a screening examination for patients with acute abdominal pain and a suspicion for acute mesenteric ischemia. CT angiography has high degree of accuracy for diagnosing acute mesenteric ischemia and is useful in excluding other causes of acute abdominal pain, and other etiologies of acute mesenteric ischemia.

For patients with risk factors and clinical features that suggest NOMI rather than another etiology for acute mesenteric ischemia, we suggest selective arteriography of the mesenteric circulation over other vascular imaging modalities. Digital subtraction arteriography offers the option of vasodilator infusion directly into the vasoconstricted mesenteric circulation. (See 'Vasodilator infusion' above.)

Treatment – The goal of treatment of patients with NOMI is to restore intestinal blood flow as rapidly as possible. Initial management of NOMI includes aggressive hemodynamic monitoring and support, correction of metabolic acidosis, initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and placement of a nasogastric tube for gastric decompression. (See 'Treatment' above.)

  1. ENDE N. Infarction of the bowel in cardiac failure. N Engl J Med 1958; 258:879.
  2. McKinsey JF, Gewertz BL. Acute mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77:307.
  3. Reinus JF, Brandt LJ, Boley SJ. Ischemic diseases of the bowel. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1990; 19:319.
  4. Boley SJ, Frieber W, Winslow PR, et al. Circulatory responses to acute reduction of superior mesenteric arterial flow. Physiologist 1969; 12:180.
  5. Al-Diery H, Phillips A, Evennett N, et al. The Pathogenesis of Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia: Implications for Research and Clinical Practice. J Intensive Care Med 2019; 34:771.
  6. Krämer SC, Görich J, Oertel F, et al. [Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia]. Rofo 2003; 175:1177.
  7. Bobadilla JL. Mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am 2013; 93:925.
  8. Wilcox MG, Howard TJ, Plaskon LA, et al. Current theories of pathogenesis and treatment of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40:709.
  9. Stöckmann H, Roblick UJ, Kluge N, et al. [Diagnosis and therapy of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI)]. Zentralbl Chir 2000; 125:144.
  10. Boley SJ, Brandt LJ, Sammartano RJ. History of mesenteric ischemia. The evolution of a diagnosis and management. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77:275.
  11. Clair DG, Beach JM. Mesenteric Ischemia. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:959.
  12. Acosta S. Epidemiology of mesenteric vascular disease: clinical implications. Semin Vasc Surg 2010; 23:4.
  13. Acosta S, Ogren M, Sternby NH, et al. Fatal nonocclusive mesenteric ischaemia: population-based incidence and risk factors. J Intern Med 2006; 259:305.
  14. Björck M, Wanhainen A. Nonocclusive mesenteric hypoperfusion syndromes: recognition and treatment. Semin Vasc Surg 2010; 23:54.
  15. Sitges-Serra A, Mas X, Roqueta F, et al. Mesenteric infarction: an analysis of 83 patients with prognostic studies in 44 cases undergoing a massive small-bowel resection. Br J Surg 1988; 75:544.
  16. Bassiouny HS. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77:319.
  17. Reichling C, Nobile L, Pezzullo M, et al. Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia as a Fatal Complication in Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Series. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:1212.
  18. Sakamoto T, Fujiogi M, Matsui H, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia after cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Heart Vessels 2020; 35:630.
  19. Rossi UG, Petrocelli F, Seitun S, Ferro C. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia in a dialysis patient with extensive vascular calcification. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 60:843.
  20. Quiroga B, Verde E, Abad S, et al. Detection of patients at high risk for non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in hemodialysis. J Surg Res 2013; 180:51.
  21. Groesdonk HV, Klingele M, Schlempp S, et al. Risk factors for nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia after elective cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145:1603.
  22. Sudhakar CB, Al-Hakeem M, MacArthur JD, Sumpio BE. Mesenteric ischemia secondary to cocaine abuse: case reports and literature review. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92:1053.
  23. Liu JJ, Ardolf JC. Sumatriptan-associated mesenteric ischemia. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:597.
  24. Weil J, Sen Gupta R, Herfarth H. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia induced by digitalis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19:277.
  25. Guglielminotti J, Tremey B, Maury E, et al. Fatal non-occlusive mesenteric infarction following digoxin intoxication. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26:829.
  26. Diamond SM, Emmett M, Henrich WL. Bowel infarction as a cause of death in dialysis patients. JAMA 1986; 256:2545.
  27. Gennaro M, Ascer E, Matano R, et al. Acute mesenteric ischemia after cardiopulmonary bypass. Am J Surg 1993; 166:231.
  28. Garofalo M, Borioni R, Nardi P, et al. Early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2002; 43:455.
  29. Endress C, Gray DG, Wollschlaeger G. Bowel ischemia and perforation after cocaine use. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:73.
  30. Mitsuyoshi A, Obama K, Shinkura N, et al. Survival in nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia: early diagnosis by multidetector row computed tomography and early treatment with continuous intravenous high-dose prostaglandin E(1). Ann Surg 2007; 246:229.
  31. Muschitz GK, Fochtmann A, Keck M, et al. Non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia: the prevalent cause of gastrointestinal infarction in patients with severe burn injuries. Injury 2015; 46:124.
  32. Anderson JE, Brown IE, Olson KA, et al. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia in patients with methamphetamine use. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018; 84:885.
  33. Soussi S, Taccori M, De Tymowski C, et al. Risk Factors for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia in Critically Ill Burns Patients-A Matched Case-Control Study. Shock 2019; 51:153.
  34. Bomberg H, Stroeder J, Karrenbauer K, et al. Establishment of Predictive Models for Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia Comparing 8,296 Control with 452 Study Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:1290.
  35. Matsumoto S, Shiraishi A, Kojima M, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy for nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia in models with biomarkers including intestinal fatty acid-binding protein in addition to clinical findings. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019; 86:220.
  36. Finucane PM, Arunachalam T, O'Dowd J, Pathy MS. Acute mesenteric infarction in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37:355.
  37. Hagspiel KD, Leung DA, Angle JF, et al. MR angiography of the mesenteric vasculature. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40:867.
  38. Bradbury MS, Kavanagh PV, Chen MY, et al. Noninvasive assessment of portomesenteric venous thrombosis: current concepts and imaging strategies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26:392.
  39. Ofer A, Abadi S, Nitecki S, et al. Multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:24.
  40. Aschoff AJ, Stuber G, Becker BW, et al. Evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: accuracy of biphasic mesenteric multi-detector CT angiography. Abdom Imaging 2009; 34:345.
  41. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on intestinal ischemia. Gastroenterology 2000; 118:951.
  42. http://www.gastro.org/practice/medical-position-statements/archive (Accessed on June 25, 2013).
  43. Lee SS, Park SH. Computed tomography evaluation of gastrointestinal bleeding and acute mesenteric ischemia. Radiol Clin North Am 2013; 51:29.
  44. Kougias P, Lau D, El Sayed HF, et al. Determinants of mortality and treatment outcome following surgical interventions for acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46:467.
  45. Upponi S, Harvey JJ, Uberoi R, Ganeshan A. The role of radiology in the diagnosis and treatment of mesenteric ischaemia. Postgrad Med J 2013; 89:165.
  46. Siegelman SS, Sprayregen S, Boley SJ. Angiographic diagnosis of mesenteric arterial vasoconstriction. Radiology 1974; 112:533.
  47. Mazzei MA, Mazzei FG, Marrelli D, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of mesentery: diagnostic value in acute mesenteric ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012; 36:1.
  48. Boley SJ, Sprayregan S, Siegelman SS, Veith FJ. Initial results from an agressive roentgenological and surgical approach to acute mesenteric ischemia. Surgery 1977; 82:848.
  49. Lock G. Acute mesenteric ischemia: classification, evaluation and therapy. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2002; 65:220.
  50. Oliva IB, Davarpanah AH, Rybicki FJ, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® imaging of mesenteric ischemia. Abdom Imaging 2013; 38:714.
  51. Li KC. Magnetic resonance angiography of the visceral arteries: techniques and current applications. Endoscopy 1997; 29:496.
  52. Laissy JP, Trillaud H, Douek P. MR angiography: noninvasive vascular imaging of the abdomen. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:488.
  53. Fleischmann D. Multiple detector-row CT angiography of the renal and mesenteric vessels. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45 Suppl 1:S79.
  54. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Catalano C, Passariello R. Multislice spiral computed tomography angiography of mesenteric arteries. Lancet 2001; 358:638.
  55. Horton KM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:199.
  56. Kim AY, Ha HK. Evaluation of suspected mesenteric ischemia: efficacy of radiologic studies. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:327.
  57. Mazzei MA. Acute mesenteric ischemia: guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery: a brief radiological commentary. World J Emerg Surg 2018; 13:34.
  58. Nakamura Y, Urashima M, Toyota N, et al. Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI): utility of measuring the diameters of the superior mesenteric artery and superior mesenteric vein at multidetector CT. Jpn J Radiol 2013.
  59. Silvestri L, van Saene HK, Zandstra DF, et al. Impact of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1370.
  60. Stahl K, Rittgerodt N, Busch M, et al. Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia and Interventional Local Vasodilatory Therapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature. J Intensive Care Med 2020; 35:128.
  61. Habboushe F, Wallace HW, Nusbaum M, et al. Nonocclusive mesenteric vascular insufficiency. Ann Surg 1974; 180:819.
  62. Miyazawa R, Kamo M. What affects the prognosis of NOMI patients? Analysis of clinical data and CT findings. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:5327.
  63. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/DrugShortages/ucm314742.htm (Accessed on November 18, 2013).
  64. Boley SJ, Treiber W, Winslow PR, et al. Circulatory responses to acute reduction of superior mesenteric arterial flow. Physiologist 1969; 12:180.
  65. Park WM, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ Jr, et al. Contemporary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: Factors associated with survival. J Vasc Surg 2002; 35:445.
  66. Ward D, Vernava AM, Kaminski DL, et al. Improved outcome by identification of high-risk nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, aggressive reexploration, and delayed anastomosis. Am J Surg 1995; 170:577.
  67. Irie T, Matsutani T, Hagiwara N, et al. Successful treatment of non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia with indocyanine green fluorescence and open-abdomen management. Clin J Gastroenterol 2017; 10:514.
Topic 91221 Version 17.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟