UpToDate
UpToDate خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده: 4

Hand, foot, and mouth disease and herpangina

Hand, foot, and mouth disease and herpangina
Authors:
José R Romero, MD, FAAP, FIDSA, FPIDS, FAAAS
Liset Olarte, MD, MSc
Section Editor:
Morven S Edwards, MD
Deputy Editor:
Diane Blake, MD
Literature review current through: May 2025. | This topic last updated: Jun 25, 2025.

INTRODUCTION — 

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is a clinical syndrome characterized by an oral enanthem and a macular, maculopapular, or vesicular rash of the hands and feet (and possibly other locations) [1]. HFMD is one of the most recognizable viral exanthems in children and adults [2]. HFMD was first described in a summer outbreak that occurred in Toronto, Canada in 1957 and was caused by coxsackievirus A16 [3]. Since then, at least 15 other enterovirus serotypes have been shown to cause HFMD, most commonly Coxsackievirus A serotypes.

Herpangina is a benign clinical syndrome characterized by fever and a painful papulo-vesiculo-ulcerative oral enanthem [4]. It can be clinically differentiated from HFMD and primary herpetic gingivostomatitis [5]. Herpangina was first described in the 1920s, but the viral etiology was not established until 1951 [4,6,7]. Herpangina is caused by at least 22 enterovirus serotypes, most commonly Coxsackievirus A serotypes.

An overview of HFMD and herpangina will be presented here. Other enterovirus infections are discussed separately. (See "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Epidemiology and pathogenesis" and "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention".)

PATHOGENESIS — 

Human enterovirus infection occurs after oral ingestion of virus that is shed from the gastrointestinal or upper respiratory tract of infected individuals (ie, via the ingestion of fecal material, oral secretions, or, for some serotypes, respiratory secretions) [8]. Human enterovirus infection also may occur following contact with vesicle fluid or oral and respiratory secretions [3,8,9].

Virus may be detected in the stool for six weeks and sometimes for several months after infection. The duration of shedding from the oropharynx is generally less than four weeks. Prolonged shedding in the stool and the innate environmental stability of the enteroviruses favors their transmission.

Once ingested, the enteroviruses replicate in the submucosal lymphoid tissues of the lower intestine and, to a lesser extent, the pharynx. Following replication, the enteroviruses spread to the regional lymph nodes. Replication at these sites results in a "minor viremia" that disseminates virus throughout the body, resulting in infection of reticuloendothelial tissues and multiple organs (eg, central nervous system, heart, liver, skin). Replication at these sites is responsible for the clinical manifestations of enteroviral infections. Further replication at the disseminated sites leads to a "major viremia," which continues until the host produces type-specific antibodies. Enterovirus replication in organ tissues results in the death of infected cells, with accompanying inflammation and necrosis. (See "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Epidemiology and pathogenesis", section on 'Pathogenesis'.)

Biopsies of HFMD vesicular lesions show loose strands of fibrin, lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils within the vesicular fluid [2]. Extensive acantholysis with reticular degeneration is seen in the overlying epidermis with perivascular foci of lymphocytic, monocytic, and neutrophilic leukocytes in the upper dermis. In adults with HFMD due to coxsackievirus A6, skin biopsies demonstrated spongiosis, neutrophilic exocytosis, massive keratinocyte necrosis, and basal cell vacuolization [10]. The upper epidermis showed shadow cells, and the follicles and sweat glands contained necrotic cells. There was a dense superficial dermal infiltrate of CD31 lymphocytes and strong granulysin expression. Light microscopy of biopsies of skin lesions or scrapings of the base of vesicles does not demonstrate nuclear inclusion bodies and multinucleated giant cells, which helps to distinguish HFMD from varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex virus [2,10-13]. Intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies have been observed in only one report [12].

EPIDEMIOLOGY — 

HFMD and herpangina occur worldwide. Outbreaks involving day care centers, schools, summer camps, university residential halls, hospital wards, military installations, communities, large geographic areas, and entire countries have been reported [14-18]. Intrafamily spread occurs in both HFMD and herpangina.

Most cases of HFMD and herpangina occur in infants and children, particularly those younger than five to seven years [14,19-27]. However, sporadic cases and epidemics principally affecting older children, adolescents, and adults have been reported [10,21,28-30].

HFMD and herpangina usually occur during the summer and early autumn, similar to other clinical syndromes caused by enteroviruses. However, outbreaks and sporadic cases of HFMD can occur during the winter months [24,31-34]. In tropical areas, cases of HFMD occur during the rainy season [19]. Environmental temperature and humidity affect the transmissibility of HFMD, thereby affecting its incidence [35-37]. This correlation suggests that the increasing global incidence of HFMD may be related to climate change [35,38].

Decreases in the number of cases of HFMD due to enterovirus A71 (EV-A71), coxsackieviruses, and echoviruses were observed in China and Japan during the first year of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [39-41]. This may be due to the impact of nonpharmacologic measures used to control transmission of the COVID-19 virus. (See "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Epidemiology and pathogenesis", section on 'Epidemiology'.)

VIROLOGY

Viral etiology — Multiple enterovirus serotypes cause HFMD and herpangina (table 1). The majority of these serotypes belong to the Enterovirus A species of the genus Enterovirus. (See "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Epidemiology and pathogenesis", section on 'Classification'.)

Coxsackievirus A16 and enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) are the serotypes most frequently associated with HFMD and are responsible for the majority of large outbreaks [42,43]. EV-A71 has been associated with outbreaks involving thousands of persons in the Asia-Pacific region [44,45]. Beginning in 2008, coxsackievirus A6 has been increasingly reported as a cause of outbreaks of HFMD around the world [9,19,43,46-51]. (See 'Enterovirus A71 HFMD' below and 'Coxsackievirus A6 HFMD' below.)

Coxsackievirus A1 to 6, 8, 10, and 22 are the principal enterovirus serotypes associated with herpangina [25,52,53]. In the Asia-Pacific region, large outbreaks of EV-A71 and coxsackievirus A16 are also a common cause of herpangina [54,55]. The seroprevalence of EV-A71 has reached as high as 99 percent in certain Asian countries [56].

Transmission — The viruses that cause HFMD and herpangina usually are transmitted from person to person by the fecal-oral route. However, they also can be transmitted by contact with oral and respiratory secretions and, in the case of HFMD, vesicle fluid [3,8,9].

Nucleic acid amplification testing demonstrates fecal shedding of enterovirus for up to 10 weeks and respiratory tract shedding for up to 30 days after the onset of infection, depending upon enterovirus type and severity of illness [57,58]. Traditional methods of viral detection demonstrated fecal shedding for four to six weeks and respiratory tract shedding for ≤3 weeks [59]. An outbreak investigation of HFMD due to coxsackievirus A16 in a daycare center suggests that children are infectious for <7 days [60]. Both infection and viral shedding can occur without clinical signs of illness [59].

A serotype-specific surveillance of Japanese wastewater identified a cyclical pattern and variable transmissibility of HFMD serotypes. Notably, enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) exhibited lower transmissibility, resulting in fewer HFMD cases, whereas coxsackievirus A6 was associated with higher transmissibility [61].

Incubation period — The incubation period for HFMD typically is three to five days, but has been reported to be as short as two days and as long as seven days [1,3,13,31,62,63].

The average incubation period for herpangina is three to five days [7], with a range of 1 to 10 days [6,7,14,15].

CLINICAL FEATURES

Hand, foot, and mouth disease

Presentation — HFMD typically presents with complaints of mouth or throat pain (in verbal children) or refusal to eat (in nonverbal children) [1,3,12,64,65]. Fever, if present, is usually <38.3°C (101°F) [1,3,12,64,66].

Prodromal symptoms usually are absent [1,64]. When reported, they include fever, fussiness, abdominal pain, emesis, and diarrhea [31,66].

Examination findings — The cardinal findings of HFMD are the oral enanthem (picture 1A-B) and the exanthem (picture 2). However, the enanthem may occur without the exanthem and the exanthem may occur without the enanthem [12,65,67,68].

Oral enanthem — The oral lesions of HFMD are anterior to the faucial pillars, most commonly on the tongue and buccal mucosa (picture 1A-B); less commonly in the gingivolabial groove and on the soft and hard palates; and occasionally on the uvula, lips, and tonsils.

The enanthem begins as erythematous macules, which progress to vesicles surrounded by a thin halo of erythema (picture 1B) [1-3,11,12,64,66,68]. Vesicle diameter usually ranges from 1 to 5 mm (0.04 to 0.2 inches) but may be greater. The vesicles quickly rupture and form superficial ulcers with a greyish-yellow base and an erythematous rim (picture 1A). Ulcer diameter typically ranges from 1 to 10 mm (0.04 to 0.4 inches), but diameters of 20 mm (0.8 inches) have been reported [3,11].

Exanthem — The exanthem associated with HFMD may be macular, maculopapular, or vesicular (picture 2) [1,3,12,64,66,68-70], and all three lesions may occur in a single patient [68]. The vesicles arise from macules or macule-papules [3,22]. Vesicle diameter ranges from 1 to 10 mm (0.04 to 0.4 inches). The vesicles are thin walled, contain a clear or turbid fluid, and are surrounded by a thin (1 mm [0.04 inch]) halo of erythema. Atypical morphologies include purpuric, petechial, eczema herpeticum-like, and Gianotti Crosti-like [70].

The skin lesions of HFMD are nonpruritic [1,3]. They usually are not painful but may be painful when HFMD is caused by certain serotypes (eg, coxsackievirus A6). The lesions typically resolve in three to four days [1,3].

The exanthem typically involves the hands (dorsum of the fingers, interdigital area, palms), feet (dorsum of the toes, lateral border of the feet, soles, heels), buttocks, legs (upper thighs), and arms (picture 3) [1,3,11,12,22,64,66]. Lesions on the buttocks are more commonly maculopapular than vesicular [66,68]. They also occur more frequently in infants and young children than in older children and adults [1,66,68].

Less commonly, vesicles may be seen on atypical sites. In a systematic review of 85 studies involving 1359 cases, the most common atypical sites were arms or legs (47 percent), face (45 percent), and torso (27 percent) [70].

Enterovirus A71 HFMD — HFMD caused by enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) has been associated with severe illness, complicated by central nervous system disease (rhombencephalitis, acute flaccid paralysis, aseptic meningitis), pulmonary edema and hemorrhage, and heart failure [23,24,54,71-77]. (See 'Complications' below and 'Clinical course' below.)

Coxsackievirus A6 HFMD — Since 2008, a novel coxsackievirus A6 genotype has been associated with more severe disease in both children and adults than generally occurs with "typical" HFMD, including (picture 3 and picture 4) [9,10,29,48,78-81]:

Higher fever

Wider distribution – Involvement of the extremities, face, lips and perioral area, buttocks, groin, and perineum; the lesions are concentrated in areas of active or dormant eczema ("eczema coxsackium") (picture 5)

More extensive skin involvement – Vesiculobullous lesions, bullae, erosions, ulcerations, and eschar formation (picture 6)

Longer duration (mean duration 12 days)

Palmar and plantar desquamation one to three weeks after HFMD

Nail dystrophy (eg, transverse ridges of the nail plate [Beau lines], shedding of the nail [onychomadesis]) one to two months after HFMD

Atypical HFMD associated with coxsackievirus A6 is discussed in greater detail separately. (See "Atypical exanthems in children", section on 'Atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease'.)

Herpangina

Presentation — The onset of herpangina is typically abrupt with high fever (38.9 to 40°C [102 to 104°F]) [4-7,15,26,27]. Fever up to 40.6°C (105°F) occasionally occurs. Seizures may accompany the onset of fever [6]. In the infants and young children unable to express themselves verbally, anorexia, emesis, and fussiness/irritability are commonly seen, individually or in combination. Older children may also complain of malaise, headache, sore throat, dysphagia, and abdominal pain.

In the sole report of a herpangina outbreak among young adults requiring hospitalization, fever (96 percent) and sore throat (96 percent) were the most frequent symptoms, followed by headache (72 percent), pain and stiffness of the neck (72 percent), pain and stiffness of the back (65 percent), nausea (50 percent), anorexia (46 percent), and abdominal colic (46 percent) [82].

Examination findings — Examination of the throat reveals hyperemia and yellow/greyish-white papulovesicular lesions. The areas most frequently involved are the anterior pillars of the fauces, soft palate, tonsils, and uvula. Very occasionally, a lesion may be seen on the hard palate, tongue, or buccal mucosa. The number of lesions varies but is usually less than 10 [6,7,14,26,27,82].

The lesions begin as papules that undergo the vesiculation in 24 hours [6]. The vesicles usually measure 1 to 2 mm in diameter and are surrounded by an areola of erythema. After approximately 24 hours, the vesicles rupture, leaving 3 to 4 mm in diameter, shallow, yellow/grayish ulcerations with a rim of intense erythema (picture 7) [14,15,26].

In children, there are usually no other physical findings. However, additional findings in adults may be significant [82]. Among young adults requiring hospitalization for herpangina, 57 percent had neck stiffness, 80 percent had a positive Kernig sign (ie, inability or reluctance to allow full extension of the knee when the hip is flexed 90 degrees), and 49 percent had cervical adenitis.

COMPLICATIONS — 

Serious complications of HFMD rarely occur, except with HFMD caused by enterovirus A71 (EV-A71). Complications of HFMD may include [21,54,72-74,83-86]:

Decreased oral intake, which may result in dehydration and may necessitate hospitalization for parenteral fluid therapy (see "Clinical assessment of hypovolemia (dehydration) in children" and "Treatment of hypovolemia (dehydration) in children in resource-abundant settings")

Rhombencephalitis (brainstem encephalitis) (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Encephalitis')

Acute flaccid paralysis (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Acute paralysis and brainstem encephalitis')

Aseptic meningitis (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Viral (aseptic) meningitis')

Myocarditis (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Myopericarditis')

Pancreatitis (rare)

Fetal loss (rare) (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Pregnant patients')

Conjunctival ulceration (rare) (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Ocular infections')

Onychomadesis (shedding of the nail) is a late complication (occurring three to eight weeks after illness onset), particularly in patients with atypical HFMD (eg, caused by coxsackievirus A6) [87,88] (see "Atypical exanthems in children", section on 'Atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease')

Complications are more common with HFMD caused by EV-A71 than other enteroviruses [23,24,54,71-75].

Herpangina is usually a benign disease. Complications are rare and almost exclusively occur when herpangina is caused by EV-A71 [54]. Complications may include:

Rhombencephalitis (brainstem encephalitis) (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Encephalitis')

Acute flaccid paralysis (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Acute paralysis and brainstem encephalitis')

Aseptic meningitis (see "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Viral (aseptic) meningitis')

DIAGNOSIS — 

The diagnosis of HFMD is made clinically, based upon the typical appearance and location of the oral enanthem (picture 1A-B) and exanthem (picture 2). The diagnosis of HFMD may be more difficult when only the enanthem or only the exanthem is present [12,68]. In most case series, approximately 75 percent of patients have both the exanthem and the enanthem, and 10 to 15 percent have only the enanthem or exanthem [1,12,65,68,85]. (See 'Hand, foot, and mouth disease' above.)

The diagnosis of herpangina is also made clinically, based upon the typical appearance and location of the oral enanthem (fewer than 10 hyperemic yellow/greyish-white papulovesicles on the anterior pillars of the fauces, soft palate, tonsils, and uvula) and associated high fever. (See 'Herpangina' above.)

Confirmation of a specific viral etiology is rarely necessary in children with uncomplicated HFMD or herpangina but may be warranted if the diagnosis is uncertain (eg, isolated exanthem) and would affect management (eg, atypical HFMD versus eczema herpeticum) or in children with complications. (See 'Coxsackievirus A6 HFMD' above and 'Complications' above and 'Differential diagnosis' below.)

When etiologic confirmation is necessary, throat, stool, and vesicular fluid samples should be obtained for cell culture or nucleic acid amplification (eg, polymerase chain reaction) [89]. For samples from all sites, nucleic acid amplification is preferred to cell culture because of increased sensitivity and the speed with which a result can be obtained (hours versus days) [90]. (See "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Laboratory diagnosis'.)

Identification or isolation of an enterovirus from vesicular fluid (or cerebrospinal fluid if HFMD is complicated by meningitis) confirms the viral etiology of HFMD. Identification or isolation of an enterovirus from the stool or throat does not definitively establish causality. Following acute infection, enteroviruses are shed from the stool and throat for prolonged periods (six weeks to several months and up to four weeks, respectively) and the isolated virus may or may not be responsible for the current symptoms [90]. (See 'Pathogenesis' above.)

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS — 

The differential diagnosis of herpangina and HFMD includes other conditions associated with oral lesions, including (see "Soft tissue lesions of the oral cavity in children"):

Aphthous ulcers – Aphthous ulcers are painful, shallow oral ulcerations with a greyish base (picture 8A-B). Patients with aphthous ulcers usually do not have skin lesions. (See "Oral lesions", section on 'Erosive, ulcerative, and bullous lesions'.)

Primary herpes simplex gingivostomatitis – Primary herpes simplex gingivostomatitis is the result of primary infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1. A prodrome of fever, anorexia, irritability, malaise, and headache precedes the appearance of oral changes. Oral changes initially consist of erythema and edema of the gingiva with clusters of vesicles. The gums are friable and bleed easily (picture 9A). Large painful ulcers are formed when the vesicles rupture and coalesce. The areas of ulceration may become covered by an eschar. The buccal mucosa, tongue, gingiva, hard palate, pharynx, lips, and perioral skin are commonly involved (picture 9B). Although patients with HSV stomatitis may have associated skin lesions (eg, herpetic whitlow), the skin lesions usually are unilateral, in contrast to the lesions of HFMD, which usually are bilateral. (See "Herpetic gingivostomatitis in young children", section on 'Clinical features'.)

The differential diagnosis of HFMD also encompasses conditions with maculopapular or vesicular rashes, including:

Pruritic lesions:

Insect bites (papular urticaria) – Papular, pruritic lesions may arise at the site of an insect bite (picture 10A-B). They may be seen following bites from mosquitos, fleas, or bedbugs. The buttocks, perineum, genitals, perianal, and axillary areas are spared. The absence of oral lesions and pruritus distinguish papular urticaria from HFMD. (See "Insect and other arthropod bites", section on 'Papular urticaria'.)

Varicella – Varicella (chickenpox) is caused by a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) virus of the herpes family of viruses. The exanthem of varicella appears in crops over several days and is usually pruritic. The rash begins as macules that rapidly progress to papules followed by vesicles and, ultimately, crusts (picture 11). The clinical course and pruritus distinguish varicella from HFMD. (See "Clinical features of varicella-zoster virus infection: Chickenpox", section on 'Clinical manifestations'.)

Id reaction – Id reaction is an autoeczematization reaction that consists of a pruritic, papulovesicular eruption and occurs secondary to dermatophyte infections such as tinea pedis, tinea manuum, tinea cruris, tinea corporis, or tinea capitis (picture 12). It is believed to be secondary to delayed-type hypersensitivity response to fungal antigens. Pruritus distinguishes id reactions from HFMD. (See "Dermatophyte (tinea) infections", section on 'Id reactions'.)

Contact dermatitis – Contact dermatitis is an allergic or irritant dermatitis that results from direct exposure of the skin to the agent causing the reaction. The rash is papular, erythematous, and pruritic. The margins of the lesion are indistinct. The lesions are in the area(s) of exposure to the inciting agent (picture 13). Pruritus distinguishes contact dermatitis from HFMD. (See "Allergic contact dermatitis in children".)

Erythema multiforme major – The immune-mediated skin lesions of erythema multiforme have a characteristic target- or bull's eye-like appearance (picture 14C). The enanthem which may involve the mucosa of the mouth (picture 14A-B), genitals, or eyes consists of erosions or bullae. In contrast to HFMD, erythema multiforme major usually occurs in young adults. However, increasing numbers of cases of atypical HFMD in adults, presenting with similarities to erythema multiforme, have been reported [91]. In these cases, histologic features of HFMD include large numbers of neutrophils in parakeratosis and in the viable epidermis, neutrophils forming intraepidermal collections, and necrotic keratinocytes in the upper one-third of the epidermis (compared with the lower-one third in erythema multiforme). (See "Erythema multiforme: Pathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical manifestations'.)

Eczema herpeticum – Eczema herpeticum (cutaneous HSV infection in patients with eczema) is characterized by multiple herpetic vesicles at the site of preexisting eczema (picture 15). The vesicles may become hemorrhagic and coalesce to form large ulcerated, bleeding areas. The involved areas are painful. Most patients have fever. Eczema herpeticum requires prompt treatment with antiviral therapy. (See "Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of herpes simplex virus type 1 infection", section on 'Eczema herpeticum' and 'Indications for hospitalization' below.)

Laboratory tests may be necessary to differentiate eczema herpeticum from atypical HFMD associated with coxsackievirus A6, in which the skin lesions may be concentrated in areas of active or dormant eczema ("eczema coxsackium" (picture 5)). These may include nucleic acid amplification tests (eg, polymerase chain reaction for enterovirus and HSV) and/or light microscopy of vesicle scraping (HSV is associated with multinucleated giant cells; enterovirus is not).

Mpox – Mpox is a zoonosis caused by monkeypox virus, a member of the genus Orthopoxvirus in the Poxviridae family. Mpox is characterized by a prodromal phase consisting of fever, headache, sore throat, back pain, myalgia, and fatigue that precedes the exanthem by one to five days. The rash of mpox begins as macules 2 to 5 mm in diameter that subsequently evolve to papules, vesicles, and pseudo-pustules. Lesions ultimately form crusts and separate. Two reports have documented confusion with HFMD [92,93]. In one report, one-third of patients suspected of having mpox had atypical HFMD secondary to coxsackievirus A6 [92]. Polymerase chain reaction testing for monkeypox virus DNA and enterovirus ribonucleic acid (RNA) can be used to differentiate the two entities.

CLINICAL COURSE — 

HFMD is generally a mild, self-limited illness that resolves within 7 to 10 days [1,13,20,31,64-66]. However, complications may occur. (See 'Complications' above.)

In a meta-analysis of 19 studies from the Asia-Pacific region (thus focused on HFMD caused by enterovirus A71 [EV-A71] rather than classic HFMD), severe HFMD (neurologic, respiratory, or circulatory complications or death) was associated with [94]:

Temperature ≥37.5°C (99.5°F)

Fever (≥37.5°C [99.5°F]) ≥3 days

Lethargy

Vomiting

EV-A71 infection

Young age

Laboratory studies usually are not necessary in children with HFMD. However, in this meta-analysis, severe HFMD was also associated with hyperglycemia (odds ratio 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.7) and increased neutrophil count (weight mean difference 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7) [94].

Herpangina typically is benign and short lived, with complete recovery. Resolution of the fever occurs, on average, in two days (range two to four days) [6,26,27,95]. The throat lesions resolve in five to six days (range 3 to 10 days) [14,27].

MANAGEMENT — 

Management is mainly supportive. Children with complications may require hospitalization. No specific antiviral therapy is available for the treatment of the enteroviruses. The genome of the enteroviruses does not encode for thymidine kinase, the enzyme necessary for acyclovir activity. In addition, controlled trials demonstrating evidence of benefit of acyclovir in patients with HFMD are lacking.

Indications for hospitalization — Indications for hospitalization in children with HFMD and herpangina may include:

Inability to maintain adequate hydration (see "Clinical assessment of hypovolemia (dehydration) in children" and "Treatment of hypovolemia (dehydration) in children in resource-abundant settings")

Development of neurologic or cardiovascular complications, such as:

Encephalitis (see "Acute viral encephalitis in children: Treatment and prevention")

Meningitis (see "Viral meningitis in children: Management, prognosis, and prevention")

Flaccid paralysis (see "Poliomyelitis and post-polio syndrome", section on 'Poliomyelitis')

Myocarditis (see "Treatment and prognosis of myocarditis in children")

The inability to differentiate eczema coxsackium (picture 5) from eczema herpeticum (picture 15) (for HFMD only)

Supportive care — For both HFMD and herpangina, the pain and fever generally are short lived. Pain and discomfort due to fever can be managed with ibuprofen or acetaminophen, although these agents should be avoided in children with dehydration until volume correction has been achieved. In severe cases oral opioids may be required.

We suggest not using topical analgesic therapies containing lidocaine or other agents (eg, diphenhydramine, Kaolin pectin) to coat oral lesions and/or soothe pain in children with HFMD, given the lack of evidence. A clinical trial did not demonstrate benefit [96], and these therapies can cause allergic reactions or toxicity from systemic absorption [97,98]. Additionally, they are difficult to apply to young children.

Children who are unable to drink sufficiently to maintain hydration should be hospitalized for parenteral fluid therapy. The assessment and treatment of dehydration are discussed separately. (See "Clinical assessment of hypovolemia (dehydration) in children" and "Maintenance intravenous fluid therapy in children" and "Treatment of hypovolemia (dehydration) in children in resource-abundant settings".)

PREVENTION

Hygiene – Hand hygiene is important in the prevention of community-acquired HFMD and herpangina [99,100]. (See "Infection prevention: Precautions for preventing transmission of infection", section on 'Hand hygiene'.)

Surfaces that come in contact with oral secretions or feces should be cleaned and disinfected. Fomites that may spread the virus should also be cleaned and disinfected. (See "Infection prevention: General principles", section on 'Cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization'.)

Child care settings – Strict adherence to hand hygiene protocols is important when changing diapers because enteroviruses are shed in the stool for weeks following infection.

Exclusion of infants and children from child care does not prevent the spread of HFMD [101]. The viruses that cause HFMD can be spread by children without symptoms and children whose symptoms have resolved. Exclusion from child care is appropriate if the child is febrile or not feeling up to participating in class, and may be necessary if the child has many open blisters (to prevent secondary skin infection) or has extensive drooling from mouth lesions (which may require care from the child care provider that may compromise care for other children).

Isolation – For hospitalized patients with HFMD and herpangina, contact precautions, in addition to standard precautions, should be used for the duration of the illness [102]. Cohorting of infected infants was effective in controlling an enterovirus outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit [103].

Vaccine – Vaccination for prevention of enterovirus and parechovirus infection is discussed separately. (See "Enterovirus and parechovirus infections: Clinical features, laboratory diagnosis, treatment, and prevention", section on 'Vaccines'.)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — 

UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or email these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient education" and the keyword[s] of interest.)

Basics topic (see "Patient education: Hand, foot, and mouth disease and herpangina (The Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Epidemiology – Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) and herpangina typically occur during the summer and early autumn. HFMD and herpangina can occur at any age; however, most cases occur in infants and children less than seven years old. (See 'Epidemiology' above.)

Virology

Viral etiology – Multiple enterovirus serotypes can cause HFMD and herpangina (table 1). Coxsackievirus A16 and enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) are the most common causes of HFMD, and coxsackievirus A1 to 6, 8, 10, and 22 are the most common causes of herpangina. (See 'Virology' above.)

Transmission – These viruses are usually transmitted from person to person by the fecal-oral route; they can also be transmitted by oral and respiratory secretions and, in cases of HFMD, vesicle fluid. (See 'Transmission' above.)

Incubation period – The incubation period is usually three to five days. (See 'Incubation period' above.)

Clinical features

Typical HFMD – Typical HFMD is characterized by (see 'Hand, foot, and mouth disease' above):

-Oral enanthem – The enanthem begins as erythematous macules that progress to vesicles with diameters that usually range from 1 to 5 mm. Vesicles quickly rupture and form superficial ulcers with diameters that typically range from 1 to 10 mm but can be larger. Painful oral lesions develop most commonly on the tongue and buccal mucosa (picture 1A-B). Oral lesions may occur without skin lesions.

-Exanthem – The exanthem may be macular, maculopapular, or vesicular. Vesicles arise from macules or macule-papules and have a diameter that ranges from 1 to 10 mm. Vesicles contain a clear or turbid fluid and are surrounded by a 1 mm halo of erythema. The exanthem is nonpruritic and typically involves the hands, feet, buttocks, legs, and arms (picture 2). Skin lesions may occur without oral lesions.

-Fever, if present, is usually below 38.3°C (101°F).

Atypical HFMD – Atypical HFMD, which is caused by coxsackievirus A6, is a more severe illness, characterized by (see 'Coxsackievirus A6 HFMD' above):

-Higher fever

-Wider distribution of lesions (picture 4)

-Vesicobullous lesions, bullae, erosions, ulcerations, and eschar

-Longer duration

-Palmar/plantar desquamation

-Nail dystrophy

Herpangina – Clinical features of herpangina include (see 'Herpangina' above):

-Abrupt onset with high fever

-Oral lesions on the anterior fauces, tonsils, and soft palate (picture 7) that may interfere with oral intake

-May be associated with vomiting, anorexia, irritability, or fussiness

Clinical course and complications – HFMD and herpangina are generally mild, self-limited illnesses. HFMD usually resolves within 7 to 10 days. The fever of herpangina typically resolves in two days and the throat lesions in five to six days.

Complications of HFMD and herpangina are rare and include encephalitis, meningitis, flaccid paralysis, or myocarditis. These are most commonly associated with EV-A71 infection. Children with complications may require hospitalization. (See 'Complications' above and 'Enterovirus A71 HFMD' above.)

Diagnosis – The diagnosis of HFMD is made clinically, based upon the typical appearance and location of the oral enanthem (picture 1A-B) and exanthem (picture 2). (See 'Diagnosis' above.)

The diagnosis of herpangina is also made clinically, based upon the typical appearance and location of the oral enanthem (fewer than 10 hyperemic yellow/greyish-white papulovesicles on the anterior pillars of the fauces, soft palate, tonsils, and uvula) and associated high fever. (See 'Diagnosis' above.)

Confirmation of a specific viral etiology is rarely necessary for uncomplicated HFMD or herpangina.

Differential diagnosis – The differential diagnosis of HFMD and herpangina includes:

Other causes of oral lesions (eg, aphthous ulcers (picture 8A-B), herpes simplex gingivostomatitis (picture 9A-B)).

Other causes of maculopapular or vesicular rashes (eg, papular urticaria (picture 10A-B), id reaction (picture 12), contact dermatitis (picture 13), erythema multiforme major (picture 14A-C), eczema herpeticum (picture 15), and mpox).

Associated clinical features usually distinguish HFMD and herpangina from these conditions. (See 'Differential diagnosis' above.)

Management – Most cases of uncomplicated HFMD and herpangina resolve spontaneously within seven days. Management is supportive. Pain and fever can be treated with ibuprofen or acetaminophen, as needed. (See 'Supportive care' above.)

Children who are unable to maintain adequate hydration may require hospitalization. (See 'Indications for hospitalization' above.)

For most children with HFMD-related oral lesions, we suggest not using topical analgesic therapies (Grade 2C). Evidence of benefit is lacking, and these therapies can cause toxicity from systemic absorption. (See 'Clinical course' above and 'Management' above.)

  1. ALSOP J, FLEWETT TH, FOSTER JR. "Hand-foot-and-mouth disease" in Birmingham in 1959. Br Med J 1960; 2:1708.
  2. Miller GD, Tindall JP. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease. JAMA 1968; 203:827.
  3. ROBINSON CR, DOANE FW, RHODES AJ. Report of an outbreak of febrile illness with pharyngeal lesions and exanthem: Toronto, summer 1957; isolation of group A Coxsackie virus. Can Med Assoc J 1958; 79:615.
  4. Zahorsky J. Herpetic sore throat. South Med J 1920; 8:871.
  5. PARROTT RH, WOLF SI, NUDELMAN J, et al. Clinical and laboratory differentiation between herpangina and infectious (herpetic) gingivostomatitis. Pediatrics 1954; 14:122.
  6. Zahorsky J. Herpangina. Arch Pediatr 1924; 41:181.
  7. HUEBNER RJ, COLE RM, BEEMAN EA, et al. Herpangina; etiological studies of a specific infectious disease. J Am Med Assoc 1951; 145:628.
  8. Romero JR, Modlin JF. Introduction to the human enteroviruses and parechoviruses. In: Mandell, Douglas, and Bennet's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 8th ed, Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ (Eds), Saunders, Philadelphia 2014. p.In press.
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Notes from the field: severe hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with coxsackievirus A6 - Alabama, Connecticut, California, and Nevada, November 2011-February 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012; 61:213.
  10. Second J, Velter C, Calès S, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease in adult patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76:722.
  11. Cherry JD, Jahn CL. Hand, foot, and mouth syndrome. Report of six cases due to coxsackie virus, group A, type 16. Pediatrics 1966; 37:637.
  12. Froeschle JE, Nahmias AJ, Feorino PM, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease (Coxsackievirus A16) in Atlanta. Am J Dis Child 1967; 114:278.
  13. Fields JP, Mihm MC Jr, Hellreich PD, Danoff SS. Hand, foot, and mouth disease. Arch Dermatol 1969; 99:243.
  14. Levine HD, Hoerr SO, Allanson JC. Vesicular pharyngitis and stomatitis. J Am Med Assoc 1939; 112:2020.
  15. Breese BB. Aphthous pharyngitis. Am J Dis Child 1941; 61:669.
  16. Mirand A, Cohen R, Bisseux M, et al. A large-scale outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease, France, as at 28 September 2021. Euro Surveill 2021; 26.
  17. Spotts PH. Outbreak of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Among University Residential Students. J Am Board Fam Med 2024; 37:513.
  18. Russell NG, Kessler R. A Hand-Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak in an Atypical Population of College Students. J Prim Care Community Health 2024; 15:21501319241266506.
  19. Puenpa J, Chieochansin T, Linsuwanon P, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus A6, Thailand, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis 2013; 19:641.
  20. Kushner PG, Krebs M. Epidemiology of hand, foot, and mouth disease in a summer camp due to Coxsackie virus A16. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1972; 72:281.
  21. Blomqvist S, Klemola P, Kaijalainen S, et al. Co-circulation of coxsackieviruses A6 and A10 in hand, foot and mouth disease outbreak in Finland. J Clin Virol 2010; 48:49.
  22. Mukherji PS, MacLean DW. Hand, foot and mouth disease in two Edinburgh practices, 1980. J R Coll Gen Pract 1982; 32:366.
  23. Ho M, Chen ER, Hsu KH, et al. An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. Taiwan Enterovirus Epidemic Working Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:929.
  24. Gilbert GL, Dickson KE, Waters MJ, et al. Outbreak of enterovirus 71 infection in Victoria, Australia, with a high incidence of neurologic involvement. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1988; 7:484.
  25. Park K, Lee B, Baek K, et al. Enteroviruses isolated from herpangina and hand-foot-and-mouth disease in Korean children. Virol J 2012; 9:205.
  26. PARROTT RH, ROSS S, BURKE FG, RICE EC. Herpangina; clinical studies of a specific infectious disease. N Engl J Med 1951; 245:275.
  27. DAVID JK Jr, LEAVITT D, HOWITT BF. Vesicular pharyngitis; its relationship to the Coxsackie group of viruses. Pediatrics 1951; 8:672.
  28. Yin XG, Yi HX, Shu J, et al. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of adult hand, foot, and mouth disease in northern Zhejiang, China, May 2008-November 2013. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14:251.
  29. Banta J, Lenz B, Pawlak M, et al. Notes from the Field: Outbreak of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Caused by Coxsackievirus A6 Among Basic Military Trainees - Texas, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65:678.
  30. Broccolo F, Drago F, Ciccarese G, et al. Severe atypical hand-foot-and-mouth disease in adults due to coxsackievirus A6: Clinical presentation and phylogenesis of CV-A6 strains. J Clin Virol 2019; 110:1.
  31. Seddon JH, Duff MF. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease: Coxsackie virus types A 5, A 10, and A 16 infections. N Z Med J 1971; 74:368.
  32. Flett K, Youngster I, Huang J, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus a6. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:1702.
  33. Liu N, Xie J, Qiu X, et al. An atypical winter outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with human enterovirus 71, 2010. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14:123.
  34. Ma E, Lam T, Chan KC, et al. Changing epidemiology of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Hong Kong, 2001-2009. Jpn J Infect Dis 2010; 63:422.
  35. Coates SJ, Davis MDP, Andersen LK. Temperature and humidity affect the incidence of hand, foot, and mouth disease: a systematic review of the literature - a report from the International Society of Dermatology Climate Change Committee. Int J Dermatol 2019; 58:388.
  36. Du Z, Lin S, Marks T, et al. Weather effects on hand, foot, and mouth disease at individual level: a case-crossover study. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19:1029.
  37. Wen W, Miao Z, Zheng D, et al. Effects of temperature and environmental covariates on the dynamic transmission of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Zhejiang, China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2025; 19:e0012884.
  38. Baker RE, Yang W, Vecchi GA, Takahashi S. Increasing intensity of enterovirus outbreaks projected with climate change. Nat Commun 2024; 15:6466.
  39. Zhao Z, Zheng C, Qi H, et al. Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 interventions on the incidence of hand, foot, and mouth disease in mainland China. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022; 20:100362.
  40. Li R, Wang M, Li D, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of hand, foot, and mouth disease due to enterovirus 71 infections. J Infect 2023; 86:e111.
  41. Hirae K, Hoshina T, Koga H. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology of other communicable diseases in Japan. Int J Infect Dis 2023; 128:265.
  42. Yang TO, Arthur Huang KY, Chen MH, et al. Comparison of Nonpolio Enteroviruses in Children With Herpangina and Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease in Taiwan. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2019; 38:887.
  43. Gao L, Zou G, Liao Q, et al. Spectrum of Enterovirus Serotypes Causing Uncomplicated Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease and Enteroviral Diagnostic Yield of Different Clinical Samples. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67:1729.
  44. Solomon T, Lewthwaite P, Perera D, et al. Virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control of enterovirus 71. Lancet Infect Dis 2010; 10:778.
  45. Gao LD, Hu SX, Zhang H, et al. Correlation analysis of EV71 detection and case severity in hand, foot, and mouth disease in the Hunan Province of China. PLoS One 2014; 9:e100003.
  46. Osterback R, Vuorinen T, Linna M, et al. Coxsackievirus A6 and hand, foot, and mouth disease, Finland. Emerg Infect Dis 2009; 15:1485.
  47. Fujimoto T, Iizuka S, Enomoto M, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus A6, Japan, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:337.
  48. Sinclair C, Gaunt E, Simmonds P, et al. Atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with coxsackievirus A6 infection, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, January to February 2014. Euro Surveill 2014; 19:20745.
  49. Hongyan G, Chengjie M, Qiaozhi Y, et al. Hand, foot and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus A6, Beijing, 2013. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33:1302.
  50. Fonseca MC, Sarmiento L, Resik S, et al. Coxsackievirus A6 and enterovirus 71 causing hand, foot and mouth disease in Cuba, 2011-2013. Arch Virol 2014; 159:2451.
  51. Ramirez-Fort MK, Downing C, Doan HQ, et al. Coxsackievirus A6 associated hand, foot and mouth disease in adults: clinical presentation and review of the literature. J Clin Virol 2014; 60:381.
  52. Cherry JD, Jahn CL. Herpangina: the etiologic spectrum. Pediatrics 1965; 36:632.
  53. Yamadera S, Yamashita K, Kato N, et al. Herpangina surveillance in Japan, 1982-1989. A report of the national epidemiological surveillance of infectious agents in Japan. Jpn J Med Sci Biol 1991; 44:29.
  54. Huang CC, Liu CC, Chang YC, et al. Neurologic complications in children with enterovirus 71 infection. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:936.
  55. Chang LY, Lin TY, Huang YC, et al. Comparison of enterovirus 71 and coxsackie-virus A16 clinical illnesses during the Taiwan enterovirus epidemic, 1998. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18:1092.
  56. Girsang RT, Rusmil K, Fadlyana E, et al. A serosurvey study of hand, foot and mouth disease in healthy children aged 6 to 71 months old in West Bandung and Bandung Region, Indonesia. BMC Infect Dis 2025; 25:124.
  57. Teng S, Zhao SY, Wei Y, et al. [Observation on virus shedding periods of enterovirus-71 and coxsackievirus A 16 monitored by nucleic acids determination in stool samples of children with hand, foot and mouth disease]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2013; 51:787.
  58. Teng S, Wei Y, Zhao SY, et al. Intestinal detoxification time of hand-foot-and-mouth disease in children with EV71 infection and the related factors. World J Pediatr 2015; 11:380.
  59. Richardson M, Elliman D, Maguire H, et al. Evidence base of incubation periods, periods of infectiousness and exclusion policies for the control of communicable diseases in schools and preschools. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2001; 20:380.
  60. Ferson MJ, Bell SM. Outbreak of Coxsackievirus A16 hand, foot, and mouth disease in a child day-care center. Am J Public Health 1991; 81:1675.
  61. Shrestha S, Malla B, Haramoto E. Evaluation of the Enterovirus serotype monitoring approach for wastewater surveillance of hand foot and mouth disease using secondary epidemiological surveillance data. Sci Total Environ 2025; 969:178896.
  62. McKellar Stewart AK. Report of Cases. Report of an Outbreak of “Hand-Foot-and-Mouth Disease” in Sydney. Med J Aust 1961; 2:394.
  63. Whiting DA, Smith MB. The clinical appearance of hand, foot and mouth disease. S Afr Med J 1969; 43:575.
  64. MAGOFFIN RL, JACKSON EW, LENNETTE EH. Vesicular stomatitis and exanthem. A syndrome associated with Coxsackie virus, type A16. JAMA 1961; 175:441.
  65. Adler JL, Mostow SR, Mellin H, et al. Epidemiologic investigation of hand, foot, and mouth disease. Infection caused by coxsackievirus A 16 in Baltimore, June through September 1968. Am J Dis Child 1970; 120:309.
  66. Evans AD, Waddington E. Hand, foot and mouth disease in south Wales, 1964. Br J Dermatol 1967; 79:309.
  67. Morgante O, Wilkinson D, Burchak EC, et al. Outbreak of hand-foot-and-mouth disease among Indian and Eskimo children in a hospital. J Infect Dis 1972; 125:587.
  68. RICHARDSON HB Jr, LEIBOVITZ A. "HAND, FOOT, AND MOUTH DISEASE"IN CHILDREN; AN EPIDEMIC ASSOCIATED WITH COXSAKIE VIRUS A-16. J Pediatr 1965; 67:6.
  69. Hubiche T, Schuffenecker I, Boralevi F, et al. Dermatological spectrum of hand, foot and mouth disease from classical to generalized exanthema. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2014; 33:e92.
  70. Starkey SY, Mar K, Khaslavsky S, et al. Atypical cutaneous findings of hand-foot-mouth disease in children: A systematic review. Pediatr Dermatol 2024; 41:23.
  71. Alexander JP Jr, Baden L, Pallansch MA, Anderson LJ. Enterovirus 71 infections and neurologic disease--United States, 1977-1991. J Infect Dis 1994; 169:905.
  72. Lum LC, Wong KT, Lam SK, et al. Fatal enterovirus 71 encephalomyelitis. J Pediatr 1998; 133:795.
  73. Chan KP, Goh KT, Chong CY, et al. Epidemic hand, foot and mouth disease caused by human enterovirus 71, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis 2003; 9:78.
  74. Jiang M, Wei D, Ou WL, et al. Autopsy findings in children with hand, foot, and mouth disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:91.
  75. Hayward JC, Gillespie SM, Kaplan KM, et al. Outbreak of poliomyelitis-like paralysis associated with enterovirus 71. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1989; 8:611.
  76. Ooi MH, Wong SC, Lewthwaite P, et al. Clinical features, diagnosis, and management of enterovirus 71. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9:1097.
  77. Messacar K, Burakoff A, Nix WA, et al. Notes from the Field: Enterovirus A71 Neurologic Disease in Children - Colorado, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67:1017.
  78. Lott JP, Liu K, Landry ML, et al. Atypical hand-foot-and-mouth disease associated with coxsackievirus A6 infection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013; 69:736.
  79. Mathes EF, Oza V, Frieden IJ, et al. "Eczema coxsackium" and unusual cutaneous findings in an enterovirus outbreak. Pediatrics 2013; 132:e149.
  80. Feder HM Jr, Bennett N, Modlin JF. Atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease: a vesiculobullous eruption caused by Coxsackie virus A6. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14:83.
  81. Buttery VW, Kenyon C, Grunewald S, et al. Atypical Presentations of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Caused by Coxsackievirus A6--Minnesota, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015; 64:805.
  82. FRASER TM. Clinical findings in an epidemic of herpangina with myalgic, neurological and gastro-enteritic features. Can Serv Med J 1957; 13:407.
  83. Ogilvie MM, Tearne CF. Spontaneous abortion after hand-foot-and-mouth disease caused by Coxsackie virus A16. Br Med J 1980; 281:1527.
  84. Brown SM. Ocular involvement in hand, foot, and mouth disease. J AAPOS 1997; 1:123.
  85. Chatproedprai S, Theanboonlers A, Korkong S, et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of hand-foot-and-mouth disease in Thailand, 2008-2009. Jpn J Infect Dis 2010; 63:229.
  86. Park B, Kwon H, Lee K, Kang M. Acute pancreatitis in hand, foot and mouth disease caused by Coxsackievirus A16: case report. Korean J Pediatr 2017; 60:333.
  87. Yan X, Zhang ZZ, Yang ZH, et al. Clinical and Etiological Characteristics of Atypical Hand-Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Children from Chongqing, China: A Retrospective Study. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015:802046.
  88. Guimbao J, Rodrigo P, Alberto MJ, Omeñaca M. Onychomadesis outbreak linked to hand, foot, and mouth disease, Spain, July 2008. Euro Surveill 2010; 15.
  89. de Crom SC, Rossen JW, van Furth AM, Obihara CC. Enterovirus and parechovirus infection in children: a brief overview. Eur J Pediatr 2016; 175:1023.
  90. Stellrecht KA, Lamson DA, Romero JR. Enteroviruses and parechoviruses. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 13th ed, Carroll KC, Pfaller MA, Karlowsky RP, et al (Eds), American Society for Microbiology, 2023. p.1762.
  91. Böer-Auer A, Metze D. Histopathology of Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease in Adults and Criteria for Differentiation From Erythema Multiforme. Am J Dermatopathol 2019; 41:273.
  92. Lewis A, Josiowicz A, Hirmas Riade SM, et al. Introduction and Differential Diagnosis of Monkeypox in Argentina, 2022. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:2123.
  93. Fathi A, Schmiedel S. Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease as Differential Diagnosis of Monkeypox, Germany, August 2022. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:2586.
  94. Fang Y, Wang S, Zhang L, et al. Risk factors of severe hand, foot and mouth disease: a meta-analysis. Scand J Infect Dis 2014; 46:515.
  95. PARROTT RH. Herpangina and herpetic gingivostomatitis; clinical differentiation. Postgrad Med 1955; 17:298.
  96. Hopper SM, McCarthy M, Tancharoen C, et al. Topical lidocaine to improve oral intake in children with painful infectious mouth ulcers: a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 63:292.
  97. Hess GP, Walson PD. Seizures secondary to oral viscous lidocaine. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:725.
  98. Questions & Answers: Reports of a rare, but serious and potentially fatal adverse effect with the use of over-the-counter (OTC) benzocaine gels and liquids applied to the gums or mouth www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm250029.htm (Accessed on August 03, 2012).
  99. Ruan F, Yang T, Ma H, et al. Risk factors for hand, foot, and mouth disease and herpangina and the preventive effect of hand-washing. Pediatrics 2011; 127:e898.
  100. Liu X, Hou W, Zhao Z, et al. A hand hygiene intervention to decrease hand, foot and mouth disease and absence due to sickness among kindergarteners in China: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Infect 2019; 78:19.
  101. American Academy of Pediatrics. Hand, foot & mouth disease: Parent FAQs. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/health-issues/conditions/infections/Pages/Hand-Foot-and-Mouth-Disease.aspx (Accessed on June 15, 2017).
  102. American Academy of Pediatrics. Enterovirus (nonpoliovirus) (group A and B coxsackieviruses, echoviruses, numbered enteroviruses). In: Red Book: 2024–2027 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 33rd ed, Kimberlin DW, Banerjee R, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH (Eds), American Academy of Pediatrics, 2024. p.369.
  103. Austin BJ, Croxson MC, Powell KF, Gunn TR. The successful containment of coxsackie B4 infection in a neonatal unit. J Paediatr Child Health 1999; 35:102.
Topic 96219 Version 35.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟