ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﯽ
خرید پکیج
تعداد آیتم قابل مشاهده باقیمانده : 3 مورد
نسخه الکترونیک
medimedia.ir

Exercise therapy for low back pain

Exercise therapy for low back pain
Literature review current through: May 2024.
This topic last updated: May 24, 2024.

INTRODUCTION — Low back pain (LBP) is the most common musculoskeletal complaint worldwide, with up to 85 percent of all people experiencing LBP during their lifetimes [1]. Exercise is often recommended to patients with LBP because it reduces pain and helps maintain or restore flexibility, strength, and endurance [2].

LBP is defined as acute (less than four weeks), subacute (4 to 12 weeks), or chronic (more than 12 weeks), according to the duration of symptoms.

This topic will address the rationale and evidence pertaining to exercise in the treatment of nonspecific LBP, which is central or axial pain between T12 and the pelvis that cannot reliably be attributed to a specific disease or spinal pathology [3]. Exercise-based therapy for nonspecific LBP is most appropriate for those with persistent and bothersome symptoms despite self-care management. Those with lumbar radiculopathy and LBP due to spinal stenosis are discussed separately:

(See "Acute lumbosacral radiculopathy: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Physical therapy'.)

(See "Lumbar spinal stenosis: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Physical therapy'.)

The evaluation of LBP and other treatment modalities for LBP are also discussed separately. As examples:

(See "Evaluation of low back pain in adults".)

(See "Treatment of acute low back pain".)

(See "Subacute and chronic low back pain: Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment".)

(See "Subacute and chronic low back pain: Nonsurgical interventional treatment".)

(See "Subacute and chronic low back pain: Surgical treatment".)

ACUTE LOW BACK PAIN — Nonspecific, acute LBP is defined as LBP of less than four weeks duration that cannot reliably be attributed to a specific disease or spinal pathology [3]. The approach to evaluating LBP, including both nonspecific LBP and consideration of specific etiologies, is discussed separately. (See "Evaluation of low back pain in adults".)

While continued activity is encouraged in patients with acute LBP, we do not routinely refer such patients for exercise or physical therapy, as acute LBP (duration of symptoms less than four weeks) is self-limited in most patients [4,5]. Exercise treatment has not been shown to be more beneficial for acute LBP when compared with other acute treatments [6-9]. Therefore, we instead reserve exercise therapy for patients not improved with initial treatment. (See "Treatment of acute low back pain", section on 'Exercise and physical therapy' and "Treatment of acute low back pain", section on 'General approach to care'.)

Patients with acute LBP should be advised to avoid bedrest and stay as active as possible [10]. Patients who wish to exercise may continue to perform their usual exercise regimen or try home-based exercises as tolerated.

SUBACUTE AND CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN — LBP is defined as subacute (4 to 12 weeks) or chronic (more than 12 weeks) according to the duration of symptoms.

Exercise improves symptoms in subacute and chronic low back pain — We advise exercise or movement-based therapy as a key component of treatment for all patients with subacute and chronic LBP [7,11].

In several systematic reviews of randomized trials, exercise modestly improved pain and function in patients with subacute and chronic LBP [7,8,12,13]. In addition, patients with chronic LBP who regularly participate in moderate to vigorous leisure-time activities have less pain and better function compared with those who are less physically active [14].

The exact mechanism of benefit of exercise in subacute and chronic LBP is uncertain, and several mechanisms are likely to contribute:

Psychologic – Exercise provides psychologic benefits, including reductions in stress, anxiety, and depression [15-17]. There is a strong association between chronic LBP and depression, and exercise may help to improve the mood of chronic LBP patients, which in turn may lead to an increase in their level of physical activity [18,19]. Some patients are anxious about reinjuring their back and exhibit fear of movement (kinesophobia); exercise can be a means by which these patients learn to confront and overcome their fear [20]. In addition, physical activity interventions can improve the perception of exercise self-efficacy in activity-restricted individuals [21].

Neurologic – In animal studies, exercise reverses injury-induced neurologic changes in the sensory ganglia, spinal cord, and brain [22-25]. The effects of exercise on pain in animals appear to be generalized; various exercises, even exercise that excludes the injured body part, reduce evidence of pain in the affected region [26].

Inflammation – Additionally, human studies have found that elevated proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress accompany LBP, and exercise attenuates these inflammatory processes [27].

Musculoskeletal – Exercise has positive effects on human muscle, joint, and intervertebral disc metabolism [28-30]. These tissues require periodic loading in order to maintain their normal metabolism and repair microtrauma. The intervertebral disc does not receive a blood supply and obtains nutrients and metabolism by imbibition (the direct absorption of fluid by the disc), which is optimized by motion and impact.

Counseling and anticipatory guidance — Counseling patients regarding their expectations; addressing patient fears and concerns; and assessing fitness level, interests, and availability of resources are all necessary in formulating an appropriate exercise plan for subacute or chronic LBP. Patients with LBP desire clear and consistent advice from their health care providers regarding treatment options, including self-management as well as information on prognosis and impact on their occupation [31].

Provide motivation — Individuals with neuromusculoskeletal conditions, including LBP, report complex barriers, demotivators, and motivators to performing exercise [32]. Demotivators to exercise include lack of interest, inaccessibility, high cost, self-consciousness, embarrassment, anxiety, frustration, and anger. Motivators to exercise include goal setting and achieving, enjoyment, feeling good and "normal," optimism, self-redefinition, and "escape from everyday boundaries."

Motivational interviewing and motivational enhancement therapy techniques can improve exercise motivation and compliance in patients with chronic LBP [33]. Health coaching for people with LBP with low recovery expectations can result in goal setting and action planning [34]. The use of motivational interviewing for promoting exercise is discussed separately. (See "Exercise for adults: Terminology, patient assessment, and medical clearance", section on 'Assessment of patient willingness to begin exercising'.)

Address patient fears — Educational efforts that address excessive fears about perceived physical vulnerability, pain neurophysiology, and obstacles to exercise and that promote the benefits of exercise can increase physical activities in this population [35-37]. We advise identifying and addressing patient fears by emphasizing the following points:

Mild discomfort does not indicate an activity should be discontinued – Patients may believe or have previously received advice that certain activities (eg, bending from the waist, twisting, exercise, weightlifting, and other sports activities that stress the spine) are unsafe, particularly if those activities provoke discomfort. Reassurance that a graded return to activity may prompt mild discomfort, along with guidance on when to reduce or discontinue activity (severe or neurologic pain), can be helpful. (See 'Educate about risks and adverse effects' below.)

Many back "abnormalities" are not contraindications to activity – Patients who have had prior imaging may misunderstand the importance of the anatomic variations that have been identified, such as degenerating, bulging, or herniated discs; facet joint arthritis; ligamentum flavum hypertrophy; spinal stenosis; and hemangiomas. We educate patients that these anatomic findings are not necessarily associated with their pain, do not necessarily require intervention, and can be found in the asymptomatic population [38,39]. Although these anatomic variations may persist, physical activity is not contraindicated, and pain can be well managed and resolve over time.

It may also be helpful to further investigate pre-existing conditions; some patients have been told previously that they have back, hip, or sacroiliac joint "misalignment" or other nonspecific musculoskeletal conditions. In some cases, additional evaluation is necessary to exclude serious etiologies of LBP in which exercise may be contraindicated or may require specialist supervision. The evaluation of LBP, including consideration of serious etiologies (eg, cauda equina syndrome, spinal instability from metastatic disease, etc), is discussed separately. (See "Evaluation of low back pain in adults".)

In the absence of evidence supporting a definitive diagnosis, including compatible medical history, imaging, and/or specialist evaluation, these "diagnoses" are not generally accepted as contributory to symptoms, and patients may be reassured that physical activity is not contraindicated.

Activity recommendations for patients with known spinal stenosis, radiculopathy, or other spinal diagnoses are discussed separately, as patients with these conditions have existing spinal pathology that is distinct from patients with nonspecific LBP. (See "Treatment and prognosis of cervical radiculopathy", section on 'Exercise therapy' and "Lumbar spinal stenosis: Treatment and prognosis", section on 'Physical therapy'.)

Psychologic and mind-body therapies can be a useful adjunct – Patients with features of central sensitization or nociplastic pain or particularly negative thinking patterns associated with back pain and exercise may benefit from referral for cognitive-behavioral therapy or mindfulness-based stress reduction. These modalities improve back pain and function by addressing psychosocial contributors to pain [40-43]. Further details on nociplastic pain are discussed separately. (See "Evaluation of chronic non-cancer pain in adults", section on 'Nociplastic pain'.)

If available, multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs are effective for patients who need more intensive therapy, including combined exercise and behavioral intervention [44]. Additional details on psychologic and mind-body therapies for subacute and chronic LBP are discussed separately. (See 'Selected exercise modalities' below.)

Educate about risks and adverse effects

Short-term increase in pain – Among patients with LBP, a temporary exacerbation of symptoms may occur during or after therapeutic exercise. Counseling the patient that there may be an initial exacerbation of symptoms before there is an improvement can be reassuring and reduce kinesiophobia [37]. Increased LBP following exercise is common, usually benign, and simply indicates that the pain-producing tissues have been stimulated.

Overall, when compared with nonexercising control populations, exercise does not appear to increase the risk of LBP exacerbations [2,45].

Risk of injury – As with any movement-based program, there are risks of injury and other adverse events that may occur with exercise.

Patients may be at risk for musculoskeletal injuries to the hips, knees, and ankles. These and other general risks of exercise are discussed separately. Older or frail patients may be at greater risk of injury due to impaired proprioception and balance as well as osteoporosis and other medical comorbidities. The medical evaluation prior to recommending any exercise program for a patient is also reviewed separately. (See "The benefits and risks of aerobic exercise", section on 'Risks of exercise' and "Exercise for adults: Terminology, patient assessment, and medical clearance", section on 'Medical assessment and clearance for exercise'.)

Supervision of exercise by an athletic trainer or physical therapist may help to mitigate the risk of injury by ensuring that the patient maintains correct physical form and proper movement patterns. (See "Physical activity and exercise in older adults", section on 'Developing an activity plan' and "Exercise prescription and guidance for adults", section on 'Strategies to reduce risk during exercise'.)

Formulating an individual exercise plan — All patients with subacute and chronic LBP will likely benefit from physical activity. A patient's individual exercise ability and tolerance should be considered when making exercise program recommendations. Some patients may never have participated in exercise, while others may have stopped or greatly diminished physical activities and exercise because of their pain. Patient preference and ability will also guide recommendations for independent versus supervised exercise programs.

Patient factors – When formulating an individual exercise plan, we consider the following:

Current level of physical activity

Current or previous types of exercise/exercise experience

Interest in starting exercise

Interest in supervised versus independent exercise

Exercise options available within the patient's community

Insurance coverage for exercise therapy and/or cost

Degree of supervision – Patients who are already active and exercising independently should be encouraged to continue.

Patients who have never been active may benefit from a supervised, graded program with more support. Patients interested in supervised or group exercise may be more comfortable when recommended programs are matched with their abilities and exercise experience [46]. (See 'Selected exercise modalities' below.)

Patients with significant functional impairment, deconditioning, or fear avoidance of movement may also benefit from a more structured, guided approach to exercise initiation. For these patients, a referral to physical therapy for formal exercise instruction and education is reasonable.

Referral specifications – For patients in whom supervised physical therapy is recommended, we find it helpful to specify expectations in the physical therapy referral, as without a detailed prescription, some patients may receive a one-time evaluation only, which may be insufficient.

As an example, in our physical therapy prescription, we typically request an "active exercise program including quota-based, non-pain-contingent, progressive stretching, lifting, and back strengthening," to emphasize the following:

Quota based – In quota-based exercise, participants perform a predetermined "quota" of activity during scheduled sessions. Exercise intensity and resistance quotas are increased at regular intervals (usually every session or two), to achieve goal exercise and exertion levels.

Non-pain contingent – With non-pain-contingent exercises, the planned activity is attempted even when mild or moderate pain is present.

In contrast to active therapy, passive modalities (superficial heat, cold, electrical stimulation, etc) and manual treatment are of limited benefit in patients with subacute and chronic LBP and may inadvertently discourage activity and exercise [47].

We also advise exercises that simulate real-life movements (eg, progressive trunk, back, and leg strengthening and lumbar lifting from floor to waist) and a lifting goal of up to 20 percent ideal body weight as tolerated. These specifications support active engagement, assist with fear and pain avoidance desensitization, and emphasize progressive physical activity as a key component of LBP treatment [48-51]. (See 'Exercise improves symptoms in subacute and chronic low back pain' above.)

Each physical therapy protocol should be customized for each patient, which may include details as described above, in addition to the evaluative process performed by the therapist. For complicated patients for whom the details of an optimal therapy protocol are unclear, a consultation with a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist should be considered.

Selected exercise modalities — No single exercise technique has superiority over others for patients with subacute and chronic LBP [52]. Studies comparing exercise modalities have been inconclusive due to low quality of evidence and risk of bias. As an example, in a network meta-analysis of 217 trials evaluating specific exercises recommended by clinicians to address chronic LBP in over 20,000 patients, three exercise modalities (Pilates, McKenzie therapy, functional restoration) had greater benefit in improving pain intensity and functional limitations compared with other exercise treatments [53]. However, limitations included within-study risk of bias and heterogeneity.

All of the exercise approaches listed have demonstrated modest effects for reducing the pain and disability associated with LBP, without strong evidence for the superiority of any type of exercise. While anecdotal reports may suggest "matching" subgroups of LBP patients to specific exercise programs results in improved clinical outcomes, the literature provides conflicting evidence about subgrouping patients, and we do not support this approach. Instead, the decision for which specific type of exercise to recommend should be based on patient preference, cost, convenience, local availability, and clinician experience.

In order of increasing complexity and supervision, some of the more popular and widely available exercise approaches for LBP are reviewed here:

Walking – Walking, the simplest and most readily available form of exercise, may be effective in decreasing symptoms of different types of chronic musculoskeletal pain, including LBP.

In a meta-analysis of 19 randomized trials, walking and running were slightly more effective than no intervention in improving chronic LBP symptoms but were slightly less effective than stabilization exercises, physical therapy, tai chi, or other general exercise [54].

Aerobic exercise – Aerobic exercise is effective in decreasing symptoms of LBP. In a meta-analysis of eight cohort studies evaluating a variety of aerobic exercises (including bicycling, swimming, treadmill walking, and elliptical trainers), aerobic exercise was associated with decreased pain intensity and improved physical functioning over time in patients with chronic LBP [55].

In a subsequent meta-analysis of six randomized studies comparing progressive aerobic exercise with progressive resistance exercise in patients with chronic LBP, the two different exercise programs were equally effective in reducing back pain [56].

Stretching exercises – There are a wide range of stretching exercises and programs available for patients with LBP, including both independent and guided stretching. Participation in a variety of different stretching programs may be beneficial in reducing symptoms in patients with chronic LBP as demonstrated in two randomized trials incorporating common leg and trunk stretches [57,58].

In addition, in a randomized trial of office workers with neck, shoulder, and low back pain, group exercise sessions consisting of back and general stretching combined with ergonomic worksite modifications were superior to worksite modifications alone in pain reduction at six months [59].

Pilates – Pilates is a technique of exercise that focuses on performing controlled movements of the whole body that start with the core (back and abdomen) and flow outward towards the limbs. Proponents report health benefits, including body alignment, improved breathing, strength, coordination, and balance. Pilates can be adapted to patients with varying levels of fitness, with techniques that have been adapted to treat LBP.

Pilates may be similar in efficacy to other exercise regimens for the treatment of LBP [60,61]. In a systematic review including 29 randomized trials, Pilates was no more effective than any other exercise for the treatment of chronic LBP [60]. In another randomized trial of patients with LBP, participating in Pilates sessions two and three times per week resulted in greater reduction of pain and disability than participating in once-weekly Pilates sessions [62].

Yoga – Yoga is a mind-body practice with three main components: physical poses/postures, breathing control, and meditation/relaxation. Yoga can be adapted for patients of different fitness levels and skills and is beneficial in managing symptoms in patients with chronic LBP. As an example, in a meta-analysis of 21 randomized trials, yoga produced small improvements in pain and function compared with nonexercise controls [63]. Yoga also was associated with small improvements in pain, although the effect did not reach the threshold for clinically meaningful improvement. Yoga was not more effective compared with other non-yoga exercises for improvement in function in patients with chronic LBP. (See "Overview of yoga".)

Tai chi – Tai chi is a mind-body exercise characterized by flowing movements that emphasizes balance, focus, fitness, and breathing, and it can be helpful in the management of LBP. Tai chi can be practiced by individuals of varying fitness levels and skills; for this reason, it may be less likely to result in injury among older patients with LBP.

In a systematic review of randomized trials of patients with chronic pain, two of the three studies done on patients with LBP showed that tai chi plus physical therapy was modestly more effective than physical therapy alone [64]. In a subsequent meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating the effects of yoga, Qigong, and tai chi on chronic LBP, all forms of exercise were beneficial in symptom management, while those participating in tai chi experienced the greatest reduction in pain intensity [65].

Alexander Technique – The Alexander Technique involves providing individualized, hands-on instruction to improve balance, posture, and coordination; education about harmful habits; and muscle-use education to avoid painful movements.

In a randomized trial of 479 patients with chronic or recurrent LBP, participation in 24 sessions of the Alexander Technique was moderately effective in improving pain and disability at 12 months [66]. Receiving six sessions alone without any other treatment was ineffective, but the combination of home-based exercise and six Alexander Technique sessions resulted in moderate reduction in pain and disability and was more cost effective compared with usual care or massage therapy.

Directional preference – Directional preference is an approach to the treatment of LBP based upon the theory that, in many patients with LBP, movement in a certain direction is the primary pain generator. Directional movement that causes pain to increase or radiate away from the midline should be avoided in favor of movement that lessens or "centralizes" (moving towards the midline) pain. Exercise is then prescribed based upon these observations. Directional preference techniques rely upon the assessment of a physical therapist or other trained provider and emphasize instruction in self-care.

For patients with chronic LBP, directional preference exercise may be marginally better at improving pain and function compared with advice to stay active but is not superior to other forms of exercise [67-71].

Motor control, core, and spine stabilization exercise – Core exercise and spine stabilization exercise (also referred to as motor or movement control exercise) describe exercises that aim to activate, control, and coordinate the deep muscles of the spine, abdomen, and pelvis. The exercises are initially performed at rest, then at rest in different positions, followed by adding movement, activity, and more complex functional tasks. Core exercises may be more beneficial compared with no exercise for LBP but not compared with other exercise types [72-76].

There are variations of core exercise which attempt to fine-tune this approach (low-load motor control versus high-load lifting [77,78]; stabilizing exercise in the prone, supine, or combined prone and supine position [79]; stabilization combined with precise motor control of the trunk [80]; or stabilization combined with greater hip strengthening [81]).

The results of these variations of core exercise programs in patients with LBP are mixed. One systematic review of 29 randomized trials concluded that motor control exercise was not superior to other forms of exercise for management of chronic LBP [82]; other meta-analyses have suggested that motor control exercise may be more effective than other interventions for improving short- and long-term disability [83,84]. However, methodologic limitations of the included studies preclude firm conclusion.

Graded activities exercise/back boot camp/functional restoration – These methods refer to exercise that begins with low-resistance strengthening with progressive increases in resistance at each session. Resistive equipment includes focused machines (back and leg) as well as whole body equipment. Aerobic and stretching exercises are also introduced in a progressive fashion. This technique is also known as progressive-resisted or quota-based strengthening. The progression of exercise and resistance proceeds even in the setting of pain, including pain flare-ups, as long as the pain is tolerable. Pain is expected during and after a session; through this technique, pain decreases as exercise desensitizes the pain-producing processes [11]. Treatment is usually delivered in 8 to 12 physical therapy sessions over four to six weeks [48,85].

This type of exercise intervention is typically delivered using a cognitive behavioral approach, which includes education regarding the safety of performing exercise while experiencing pain symptoms; support and praise for successful participation; and challenge and encouragement to achieve desired functional, recreational, and life goals.

This intervention focuses on restoring optimal back and life function and may be used for injured workers. (See "Occupational low back pain: Evaluation and management", section on 'Functional restoration'.)

In a systematic review of six randomized trials comparing graded therapies (progressive resistance training and progressive aerobic training) in patients with chronic LBP, both therapies were superior to usual care for pain reduction, but neither was superior to the other [56]. In addition, in one trial, graded exercise was no more effective than physical therapy-based exercise in pain reduction at three or six months [86]. Though endurance, flexibility, and strength may improve with this type of treatment, the degree of back pain improvement shows weak or no correlation with changes in any of these physiologic parameters [87]. Thus, it is likely that pain improvement resulted from more generalized benefits of exercise. (See 'Exercise improves symptoms in subacute and chronic low back pain' above.)

Multidisciplinary (interdisciplinary) rehabilitation – Multidisciplinary, or interdisciplinary, rehabilitation combines (at a minimum) an exercise and a behavioral component provided by different health care professionals. The intensity and content of interdisciplinary therapy varies widely. These programs combine graded exercise therapy with a psychosocial approach, generally involving a psychologist. Multidisciplinary therapy can be similar to functional restoration programs but emphasizes multiple providers and behavioral interventions. This is discussed separately.

The exercise components of spine stabilization, functional restoration, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation are similar.

EXERCISE AND THE PREVENTION LOW BACK PAIN — Participation in exercise may prevent incident episodes of LBP as well as recurrence of LBP [88].

Primary prevention of low back pain — Among individuals without previous back pain, participation in any exercise may reduce the risk of developing LBP [89,90].

In a meta-analysis including 13 randomized trials and three nonrandomized trials, exercise was found to reduce the relative risk of developing LBP by 33 percent (risk ratio [RR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.85); both the severity of pain and back-related disability were also lower in the exercise group [90]. Strengthening combined with stretching or with aerobic exercises performed two to three times per week was felt to be an effective regimen in preventing LBP. The addition of an education component to exercise did not clearly improve outcomes.

Preventing recurrent episodes of low back pain — Exercise therapy may have a role in secondary prevention, particularly for those with recurrent episodes of LBP. A variety of types of exercise are beneficial, indicating that the specific activity may be less important than activity participation in general [45,91].

A meta-analysis of randomized studies examined the effects of exercise and exercise plus education in those with a history of LBP (but without significant LBP at baseline) [91]. The risk of recurrent LBP was decreased with exercise (four trials, 898 participants; 15 versus 25 percent; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.86) and exercise plus education (four trials, 442 participants; 21 versus 41 percent; RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74). A variety of exercise programs were included in the studies; leisure-time physical activity was also effective in preventing LBP. Limitations in study design make these conclusions low certainty.

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS — Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Lower spine disorders".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — UpToDate offers two types of patient education materials, "The Basics" and "Beyond the Basics." The Basics patient education pieces are written in plain language, at the 5th to 6th grade reading level, and they answer the four or five key questions a patient might have about a given condition. These articles are best for patients who want a general overview and who prefer short, easy-to-read materials. Beyond the Basics patient education pieces are longer, more sophisticated, and more detailed. These articles are written at the 10th to 12th grade reading level and are best for patients who want in-depth information and are comfortable with some medical jargon.

Here are the patient education articles that are relevant to this topic. We encourage you to print or email these topics to your patients. (You can also locate patient education articles on a variety of subjects by searching on "patient info" and the keyword(s) of interest.)

Basics topic (see "Patient education: Low back pain in adults (The Basics)" and "Patient education: Back exercises (The Basics)")

Beyond the Basics topic (see "Patient education: Low back pain in adults (Beyond the Basics)")

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Exercise therapy for nonspecific acute low back pain – We do not routinely refer patients with nonspecific acute low back pain (LBP) for exercise or physical therapy, as acute LBP (duration of symptoms less than four weeks) is usually self-limited in most patients and exercise treatment has not been shown to be more beneficial for acute LBP when compared with other acute treatments.

However, continued activity is important; patients with acute LBP should be advised to avoid bedrest and stay active. Patients may continue their usual exercise regimen as tolerated or try home-based exercises.

Exercise therapy for nonspecific subacute and chronic low back pain – For all patients with nonspecific subacute (4 to 12 weeks) and chronic (more than 12 weeks) LBP, we suggest exercise therapy rather than no exercise (Grade 2B). (See 'Subacute and chronic low back pain' above.)

Counseling and anticipatory guidance – Counseling patients regarding their expectations is essential prior to recommending and initiating an exercise or movement-based therapy program for LBP. In addition, providing motivation, addressing patient concerns, and educating about an expected short-term, mild increase in pain with exercise initiation increases compliance. (See 'Counseling and anticipatory guidance' above.)

As with any movement-based program, there are risks of injury and other adverse events that may occur with exercise. Patients may be at risk for musculoskeletal injuries to the hips, knees, and ankles, in addition to other general risks of exercise. (See 'Educate about risks and adverse effects' above and "Exercise for adults: Terminology, patient assessment, and medical clearance", section on 'Benefits and risks associated with exercise'.)

Formulating an individual exercise plan – When formulating an individual exercise plan, we consider individual exercise ability, experience with exercise, preferences for supervised versus independent exercise, local availability, and cost.

For patients referred to physical therapy, a detailed prescription specifying minimum number of sessions, type of therapy activities, and goals for therapy can provide useful guidance for the physical therapist. (See 'Formulating an individual exercise plan' above.)

All exercise modalities are beneficial – We strongly advise and encourage our patients with subacute and chronic LBP to participate in graded exercise and activities of their choice as tolerated. Available evidence suggests that physical activity and exercise are interventions with minimal adverse effects that may improve pain, function, and quality of life. No single exercise technique has superiority over others for patients with nonspecific subacute and chronic LBP. This may be because exercise in all forms has similar generalized effects on the abnormal neurologic and inflammatory processes associated with subacute and chronic LBP. (See 'Selected exercise modalities' above.)

Examples of exercise programs that are likely beneficial for patients with subacute and chronic LBP, in order of increasing complexity and supervision include:

Walking

Aerobic exercise

Stretching

Pilates

Yoga

Tai chi

Alexander Technique

Directional preference

Motor control, core, and spine stabilization exercise

Graded activities exercise/back boot camp/functional restoration

Multidisciplinary (interdisciplinary) rehabilitation

Exercise therapy to prevent nonspecific low back pain – Exercise may prevent incident LBP among those with no prior history of back pain.

In patients with recurrent LBP, we suggest exercise therapy to decrease the risk of future back pain episodes (Grade 2C). Studies show a variety of types of exercise are beneficial, indicating that the specific activity may be less important than activity participation in general. (See 'Exercise and the prevention low back pain' above.)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS — The UpToDate editorial staff acknowledges James Rainville, MD, and Kevin Bernard, MD, who contributed to an earlier version of this topic review.

  1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 2003; 81:646.
  2. Rainville J, Hartigan C, Jouve C, Martinez E. The influence of intense exercise-based physical therapy program on back pain anticipated before and induced by physical activities. Spine J 2004; 4:176.
  3. van Tulder MW, Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Spinal radiographic findings and nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of observational studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22:427.
  4. Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A, et al. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice. BMJ 1994; 308:577.
  5. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Street JH, Barlow W. Predicting poor outcomes for back pain seen in primary care using patients' own criteria. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21:2900.
  6. Machado LA, Maher CG, Herbert RD, et al. The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med 2010; 8:10.
  7. Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; :CD000335.
  8. Chou R, Huffman LH, American Pain Society, American College of Physicians. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147:492.
  9. IJzelenberg W, Oosterhuis T, Hayden JA, et al. Exercise therapy for treatment of acute non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD009365.
  10. Dahm KT, Brurberg KG, Jamtvedt G, Hagen KB. Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; :CD007612.
  11. Rainville J, Hartigan C, Martinez E, et al. Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine J 2004; 4:106.
  12. Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, Chuter V. Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2015; 29:1155.
  13. van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Verhagen AP, et al. Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010; 24:193.
  14. Pinto RZ, Ferreira PH, Kongsted A, et al. Self-reported moderate-to-vigorous leisure time physical activity predicts less pain and disability over 12 months in chronic and persistent low back pain. Eur J Pain 2014; 18:1190.
  15. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA 2018; 320:2020.
  16. Herring MP, O'Connor PJ, Dishman RK. The effect of exercise training on anxiety symptoms among patients: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170:321.
  17. Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Firth J, et al. Physical Activity and Incident Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Am J Psychiatry 2018; 175:631.
  18. Rainville J, Sobel JB, Hartigan C, Wright A. The effect of compensation involvement on the reporting of pain and disability by patients referred for rehabilitation of chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22:2016.
  19. Wegner M, Helmich I, Machado S, et al. Effects of exercise on anxiety and depression disorders: review of meta- analyses and neurobiological mechanisms. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2014; 13:1002.
  20. Marshall PWM, Schabrun S, Knox MF. Physical activity and the mediating effect of fear, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing on pain related disability in people with chronic low back pain. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0180788.
  21. Lee LL, Arthur A, Avis M. Using self-efficacy theory to develop interventions that help older people overcome psychological barriers to physical activity: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45:1690.
  22. Cobianchi S, Casals-Diaz L, Jaramillo J, Navarro X. Differential effects of activity dependent treatments on axonal regeneration and neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury. Exp Neurol 2013; 240:157.
  23. Chen YW, Lin MF, Chen YC, et al. Exercise training attenuates postoperative pain and expression of cytokines and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1 in rats. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2013; 38:282.
  24. Detloff MR, Smith EJ, Quiros Molina D, et al. Acute exercise prevents the development of neuropathic pain and the sprouting of non-peptidergic (GDNF- and artemin-responsive) c-fibers after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2014; 255:38.
  25. Almeida C, DeMaman A, Kusuda R, et al. Exercise therapy normalizes BDNF upregulation and glial hyperactivity in a mouse model of neuropathic pain. Pain 2015; 156:504.
  26. Chuganji S, Nakano J, Sekino Y, et al. Hyperalgesia in an immobilized rat hindlimb: effect of treadmill exercise using non-immobilized limbs. Neurosci Lett 2015; 584:66.
  27. Cheng YY, Kao CL, Ma HI, et al. SIRT1-related inhibition of pro-inflammatory responses and oxidative stress are involved in the mechanism of nonspecific low back pain relief after exercise through modulation of Toll-like receptor 4. J Biochem 2015; 158:299.
  28. Powers SK, Jackson MJ. Exercise-induced oxidative stress: cellular mechanisms and impact on muscle force production. Physiol Rev 2008; 88:1243.
  29. McArdle A, Jackson MJ. Exercise, oxidative stress and ageing. J Anat 2000; 197 Pt 4:539.
  30. Belavý DL, Quittner MJ, Ridgers N, et al. Running exercise strengthens the intervertebral disc. Sci Rep 2017; 7:45975.
  31. Lim YZ, Chou L, Au RT, et al. People with low back pain want clear, consistent and personalised information on prognosis, treatment options and self-management strategies: a systematic review. J Physiother 2019; 65:124.
  32. Newitt R, Barnett F, Crowe M. Understanding factors that influence participation in physical activity among people with a neuromusculoskeletal condition: a review of qualitative studies. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38:1.
  33. Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, et al. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92:176.
  34. Iles RA, Taylor NF, Davidson M, O'Halloran P. An effective coaching intervention for people with low recovery expectations and low back pain: a content analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2014; 27:93.
  35. Bodes Pardo G, Lluch Girbés E, Roussel NA, et al. Pain Neurophysiology Education and Therapeutic Exercise for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99:338.
  36. Ben-Ami N, Chodick G, Mirovsky Y, et al. Increasing Recreational Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pragmatic Controlled Clinical Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47:57.
  37. Kernan T, Rainville J. Observed outcomes associated with a quota-based exercise approach on measures of kinesiophobia in patients with chronic low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007; 37:679.
  38. Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36:811.
  39. Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, et al. Associations between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis and clinical symptoms in the general population: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:783.
  40. Anheyer D, Haller H, Barth J, et al. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Treating Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2017; 166:799.
  41. Kent P, Haines T, O'Sullivan P, et al. Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain (RESTORE): a randomised, controlled, three-arm, parallel group, phase 3, clinical trial. Lancet 2023; 401:1866.
  42. Ashar YK, Gordon A, Schubiner H, et al. Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2022; 79:13.
  43. Alrwaily M, Timko M, Schneider M, et al. Treatment-Based Classification System for Low Back Pain: Revision and Update. Phys Ther 2016; 96:1057.
  44. Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015; 350:h444.
  45. Choi BK, Verbeek JH, Tam WW, Jiang JY. Exercises for prevention of recurrences of low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; :CD006555.
  46. Slade SC, Patel S, Underwood M, Keating JL. What are patient beliefs and perceptions about exercise for nonspecific chronic low back pain? A systematic review of qualitative studies. Clin J Pain 2014; 30:995.
  47. Chou R, Shekelle P, Qaseem A, Owens DK. Correction: Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148:247.
  48. Roche G, Ponthieux A, Parot-Shinkel E, et al. Comparison of a functional restoration program with active individual physical therapy for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88:1229.
  49. Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R, et al. Back schools for non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; :CD000261.
  50. Smeets RJ, Vlaeyen JW, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Reduction of pain catastrophizing mediates the outcome of both physical and cognitive-behavioral treatment in chronic low back pain. J Pain 2006; 7:261.
  51. Rainville J, Nguyen R, Suri P. Effective Conservative Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain. Semin Spine Surg 2009; 21:257.
  52. Ferreira ML, Smeets RJ, Kamper SJ, et al. Can we explain heterogeneity among randomized clinical trials of exercise for chronic back pain? A meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2010; 90:1383.
  53. Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, et al. Some types of exercise are more effective than others in people with chronic low back pain: a network meta-analysis. J Physiother 2021; 67:252.
  54. Pocovi NC, de Campos TF, Christine Lin CW, et al. Walking, Cycling, and Swimming for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022; 52:85.
  55. Meng XG, Yue SW. Efficacy of aerobic exercise for treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 94:358.
  56. Wewege MA, Booth J, Parmenter BJ. Aerobic vs. resistance exercise for chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2018; 31:889.
  57. Lawand P, Lombardi Júnior I, Jones A, et al. Effect of a muscle stretching program using the global postural reeducation method for patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Joint Bone Spine 2015; 82:272.
  58. Keane LG. Comparing AquaStretch with supervised land based stretching for Chronic Lower Back Pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2017; 21:297.
  59. Shariat A, Cleland JA, Danaee M, et al. Effects of stretching exercise training and ergonomic modifications on musculoskeletal discomforts of office workers: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2018; 22:144.
  60. Patti A, Bianco A, Paoli A, et al. Effects of Pilates exercise programs in people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94:e383.
  61. Mostagi FQ, Dias JM, Pereira LM, et al. Pilates versus general exercise effectiveness on pain and functionality in non-specific chronic low back pain subjects. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2015; 19:636.
  62. Miyamoto GC, Franco KFM, van Dongen JM, et al. Different doses of Pilates-based exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52:859.
  63. Wieland LS, Skoetz N, Pilkington K, et al. Yoga for chronic non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 11:CD010671.
  64. Kong LJ, Lauche R, Klose P, et al. Tai Chi for Chronic Pain Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sci Rep 2016; 6:25325.
  65. Zou L, Zhang Y, Yang L, et al. Are Mindful Exercises Safe and Beneficial for Treating Chronic Lower Back Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med 2019; 8.
  66. Little P, Lewith G, Webley F, et al. Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain. BMJ 2008; 337:a884.
  67. Paatelma M, Kilpikoski S, Simonen R, et al. Orthopaedic manual therapy, McKenzie method or advice only for low back pain in working adults: a randomized controlled trial with one year follow-up. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40:858.
  68. Garcia AN, Costa Lda C, da Silva TM, et al. Effectiveness of back school versus McKenzie exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2013; 93:729.
  69. Petersen T, Kryger P, Ekdahl C, et al. The effect of McKenzie therapy as compared with that of intensive strengthening training for the treatment of patients with subacute or chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002; 27:1702.
  70. Hosseinifar M, Akbari M, Behtash H, et al. The Effects of Stabilization and Mckenzie Exercises on Transverse Abdominis and Multifidus Muscle Thickness, Pain, and Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial in NonSpecific Chronic Low Back Pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2013; 25:1541.
  71. Halliday MH, Pappas E, Hancock MJ, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the McKenzie Method to Motor Control Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain and a Directional Preference. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016; 46:514.
  72. Cho HY, Kim EH, Kim J. Effects of the CORE Exercise Program on Pain and Active Range of Motion in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2014; 26:1237.
  73. Cairns MC, Foster NE, Wright C. Randomized controlled trial of specific spinal stabilization exercises and conventional physiotherapy for recurrent low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31:E670.
  74. Koumantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain. Phys Ther 2005; 85:209.
  75. Smith BE, Littlewood C, May S. An update of stabilisation exercises for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15:416.
  76. Nabavi N, Mohseni Bandpei MA, Mosallanezhad Z, et al. The Effect of 2 Different Exercise Programs on Pain Intensity and Muscle Dimensions in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2018; 41:102.
  77. Aasa B, Berglund L, Michaelson P, Aasa U. Individualized low-load motor control exercises and education versus a high-load lifting exercise and education to improve activity, pain intensity, and physical performance in patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2015; 45:77.
  78. Michaelson P, Holmberg D, Aasa B, Aasa U. High load lifting exercise and low load motor control exercises as interventions for patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized controlled trial with 24-month follow-up. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48:456.
  79. Ojoawo AO, Hassan MA, Olaogun MOB, et al. Comparative effectiveness of two stabilization exercise positions on pain and functional disability of patients with low back pain. J Exerc Rehabil 2017; 13:363.
  80. Saner J, Kool J, Sieben JM, et al. A tailored exercise program versus general exercise for a subgroup of patients with low back pain and movement control impairment: A randomised controlled trial with one-year follow-up. Man Ther 2015; 20:672.
  81. Kendall KD, Emery CA, Wiley JP, Ferber R. The effect of the addition of hip strengthening exercises to a lumbopelvic exercise programme for the treatment of non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Sci Med Sport 2015; 18:626.
  82. Saragiotto BT, Maher CG, Yamato TP, et al. Motor control exercise for chronic non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; :CD012004.
  83. Luomajoki HA, Bonet Beltran MB, Careddu S, Bauer CM. Effectiveness of movement control exercise on patients with non-specific low back pain and movement control impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2018; 36:1.
  84. Capel-Alcaraz AM, Castro-Sánchez AM, Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, et al. Effects of Motor Control Exercises in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Sport Med 2023; 33:579.
  85. Rainville J, Jouve CA, Hartigan C, et al. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes for aggressive spine rehabilitation delivered two versus three times per week. Spine J 2002; 2:402.
  86. Magalhães MO, Comachio J, Ferreira PH, et al. Effectiveness of graded activity versus physiotherapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: midterm follow up results of a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2018; 22:82.
  87. Steiger F, Wirth B, de Bruin ED, Mannion AF. Is a positive clinical outcome after exercise therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain contingent upon a corresponding improvement in the targeted aspect(s) of performance? A systematic review. Eur Spine J 2012; 21:575.
  88. de Campos TF, Maher CG, Fuller JT, et al. Prevention strategies to reduce future impact of low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55:468.
  89. Shiri R, Falah-Hassani K. Does leisure time physical activity protect against low back pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 prospective cohort studies. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51:1410.
  90. Shiri R, Coggon D, Falah-Hassani K. Exercise for the Prevention of Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Am J Epidemiol 2018; 187:1093.
  91. Steffens D, Maher CG, Pereira LS, et al. Prevention of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:199.
Topic 7774 Version 50.0

References

آیا می خواهید مدیلیب را به صفحه اصلی خود اضافه کنید؟